Self-appropriation in nurse engagement: Facilitating the development of expert nurses using Benner and Lonergan.

Expert nurses, as described by the work of Patricia Benner, are at the peak of clinical nursing practice and vitally important in ensuring the best possible patient care and clinical outcomes. The development of Benner's theory and its relationship with the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition provides context for understanding the progression necessary for expert development. Contemporary healthcare challenges present implications to the development of advancing levels of nursing practice. Engagement has been identified as critical to achieving expert practice. I propose the incorporation of the philosophical framework of self-appropriation from Benard Lonergan as a strategy to develop internal engagement in nurses to facilitate expert practice. I outline the synergy between Benner's theory and the work of Lonergan, which provide overlap and opportunity to overcome barriers to developing expert nursing practice. In the challenging climate of healthcare, there is an obligation to promote engagement and facilitate expert nurse development, necessary for patient outcomes as well as clinical role models, preceptors, and leaders to guide future nurses.

Clinical nurse specialists in nutrition: A systematic review of roles and clinical experiences.

BACKGROUND/SCOPE: The Clinical Nurse Specialist in Nutrition is a professional capable of providing specialist clinical assistance and leadership-related clinical nutrition. To date, although their role has already been identified, there is still uncertainty about how this figure can actually fit into the various global health systems. The purpose of this review is to clarify and define the role of this professional aimed at analysing clinical experiences and data from nutrition scientific societies. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature review was conducted using the Prisma Statement in the Cochrane Library databases and subsequently in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. In addition, a manual search of studies published in Google Scholar was conducted for the analysis of 'grey literature'. Out of 3,320 identified records, 20 studies were included in the present review. [Correction added on 06 June 2024, after first online publication: The preceding sentence has been corrected from "Out of 2,348 identified records, 21 studies were included in the present review." to "Out of 3,320 identified records, 20 studies were included in the present review" in this version.] RESULTS: The development of specific training, certification and qualification protection courses is contributing to the development of this professional in various hospital and community clinical contexts. The clinical experiences identified have shown that this figure is able to provide specialist assistance by offering high levels of safety, efficacy and quality of the care provided. CONCLUSIONS/ IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The implementation of nurse nutrition specialist, to date, is still limited at the global level, and training programmes coordinated between scientific societies and nursing universities could be the basis for the development of this specialization in countries where today this figure is not yet present.

Hospital stays and costs of telemedical monitoring versus standard follow-up for diabetic foot ulcer: an open-label randomised controlled study.

Background: Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have previously shown that telemedical monitoring of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) reduces the number of visits to the outpatient clinic, without losing treatment efficacy or increasing costs. Here we present the results of an open-label, randomised controlled trial designed to investigate whether telemonitoring, provided by an expert nurse (with extensive experience in DFU and trained in remote monitoring), reduces the hospital stay and the associated costs for a patient with DFU (TELEPIED trial). Methods: Eligible patients (n = 180) were randomly allocated to: (i) a control group, in which they received standard care, and (ii) an intervention group, in which they received asynchronous telemedicine follow-up by the expert nurse. The primary outcome was the cumulative hospital days over 12 months. The main secondary outcomes were (i) direct healthcare costs (estimated in a collective perspective), (ii) wound healing and (iii) amputation rates. ITT (intention-to-treat) population was analysed. Findings: In the ITT population, cumulative hospital days were significantly higher in the control group (13.4 days [95% CI 9.0-17.8]) than in the intervention group (7.1 days [2.8-11.5]) (p = 0.0458, ANCOVA model). Cumulative direct costs over 12 months were 7185 € (95% CI 5144-9226) in the control group and 3471 € (95% CI 1430-5512) in the intervention group (p = 0.0120). The percentage of wounds healed and amputation rate were not significantly different between groups. Similar results were found with the PP population. Interpretation: The implementation of a telemedical intervention with an expert nurse could lead to a length of hospitalization and direct costs that were two times lower compared to conventional follow-up. This lower medical and economic burden was obtained without losing effectiveness on the rate of healing, nor increasing the amputation rate. Additional studies are required to confirm these findings. Funding: This study was designed, funded and conducted by CERITD (Study and Research Centre for Intensification of Diabetes Treatment, Evry, France), Genopole GIP, 20 rue Henri Desbruères, 91030 EVRY Cedex and Laboratoires URGO, 15 Avenue d'Iéna, 75116 Paris Cedex, France. The findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsor. The corresponding author (DD) certify that authors were not precluded from accessing data in the study, and they accept responsibility to submit for publication.

Characteristics of expert nurses' assessment of insertion sites for peripheral venous catheters in elderly adults with hard-to-find veins.

AIM: To clarify the characteristics of expert nurses' assessments when selecting an insertion site for a peripheral venous catheter (PVC). METHODS: Participants were 11 competent (control group) and 13 expert nurses. Using a simulated patient, we recorded the procedures participants followed when selecting a site for a PVC insertion. The researchers interviewed the nurses after the procedure by asking targeted questions about the site selection to clarify the factors influencing that selection. During the interview, a video of that nurse's procedure was observed, and each step performed during the procedure was investigated. RESULTS: We identified three assessment characteristics specific to expert nurses that influenced their PVC site selection: (a) focusing on a patient's unique characteristics and choosing the appropriate procedure for that individual; (b) avoiding complications and paying attention to the patient's daily self-care needs; and (c) carefully considering the patient's fear and fatigue during site selection and catheter insertion. Other assessments, based on the general knowledge and skill acquired by nurses in selecting a PVC site, were common to both groups: arm selection based on the patient's preference and site selection to avoid nerve injuries or complications. The control group's approach was assessed on the basis of their confidence in selecting a site for a PVC insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Expert nurses assessed the patient's individual characteristics and daily self-care needs and helped mitigate the patient's anxiety. Our findings provide a basis for educational programs that share how expert nurses assess sites for a PVC insertion.

The clinical surveillance process as carried out by expert nurses in a critical care context: A theoretical explanation.

BACKGROUND: Nursing Science presents surveillance as an indispensable component of patient safety. Although the literature defines surveillance fully, its implementation is not well understood. AIM: This research aims to formulate a theoretical explanation of the surveillance process that expert nurses employ in critical care. METHOD: To develop the theoretical explanation for the surveillance process of critical care nurses, Strauss and Corbin's (1998) grounded theory approach and Think Aloud Method (Fonteyn et al., 1993) were used with fifteen expert critical care nurses (n=15). FINDINGS: Surveillance in critical care is a continual process of collaborative vigilance that starts with the thought process and behaviour related to data collection, analysis and interpretation. The surveillance process comprises five key elements: 1) Managing the risk of complications; 2) Collecting data; 3) Detecting a problem; 4) Making a decision and 5) Working in synergy. CONCLUSION: In developing a theoretical explanation, this research leads to an understanding of the surveillance process performed by expert nurses in a critical care context.

Patient advocacy: Japanese psychiatric nurses recognizing necessity for intervention.

BACKGROUND: Advocacy is an important role of psychiatric nurses because their patients are ethically, socially, and legally vulnerable. This study of Japanese expert psychiatric nurses' judgments of interventions for patient advocacy will show effective strategies for ethical nursing practice and their relationship with Japanese culture. OBJECTIVES: This article explores Japanese psychiatric nurses' decision to intervene as a patient advocate and examine their ethical, cultural, and social implications. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using semi-structured interviews verbatim, themes of the problems that required interventions were inductively summarized by a qualitative analysis and their contexts and nursing judgments were examined. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: The participants were 21 nurses with 5 or more years of experience in psychiatric nursing. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The research was approved by Institutional Review Board of research site and study facilities. The participants gave written informed consent. FINDINGS: Analysis of 45 cases showed that nurses decided to intervene when (a) surrounding people's opinions impeded patients' safety, (b) healthcare professionals' policies impeded patients' decision-making, (c) own violent behaviors impeded treatment and welfare services for patients, (d) own or families' low acceptance of illness impeded patients' self-actualization, (e) inappropriate treatment or care impeded patients' liberty, and (f) their families abused patients' property. DISCUSSION: To solve conflicts between patients and their surrounding people, the nurses sought reconciliation between them, which is in accordance with Japanese cultural norms respecting harmony. When necessary, however, they protected patients' rights against cultural norms. Therefore, their judgments cannot be explained by cultural norms alone. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that the nurses' judgments were based on respect for patients' rights apart from cultural norms, and they first sought solutions fitting the cultural norms before other solutions. This seems to be an ethical, effective strategy if advocates know the culture in depth.