RESUMO
Background: We compared the efficiency of two MRI diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) techniques: DWI with SPIR (DWISPIR) and DWI with STIR (DWISTIR), to estimate their eligibility for quantitative assessment of Crohn's disease activity in children and adults. Methods: In inflamed terminal ileum segments (n = 32 in adults, n = 46 in children), Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) was calculated, ADC values of both DWI techniques were measured, and the corresponding Clermont scores calculated. ADC values of both DWI techniques were compared between both and within each patient group, assessing their mutual correlation. Correlations between MaRIA and the corresponding ADC values, and Clermont scores based on both DWI techniques were estimated. Results: No correlation between ADC of DWISPIR and DWISTIR was observed (rho = 0.27, p = 0.13 in adults, rho = 0.20, p = 0.17 in children). The correlation between MaRIA and Clermont scores was strong in both techniques-in SPIR, rho = 0.93; p < 0.0005 in adults, rho = 0.98, p < 0.0005 in children, and, in STIR, rho = 0.89; p < 0.0005 in adults, rho = 0.95, p < 0.0005 in children. The correlation between ADC and MaRIA was moderate negative for DWISTIR (rho = 0.93, p < 0.0005 in adults, rho = 0.95, p < 0.0005 in children), but, in DWISTIR, no correlation between ADC and MaRIA score was observed in adults (rho = -0.001, p = 0.99), whereas children presented low negative correlation (rho = -0.374, p = 0.01). Conclusions: DWISTIR is not suitable for quantitative assessment of Crohn's disease activity both in children and adult patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare two fat suppression techniques used for 3D T1-weighted sequence in breast MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), namely Dixon versus spectral fat saturation (fat sat). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All breast MRI examinations performed in a Philips 3 T unit between March 2013 and October 2015 including either a Dixon or a fat sat sequence were retrospectively analyzed. The examinations were subjectively evaluated by two independent experienced readers in a scale of 5 for overall quality of fat suppression, homogeneity of fat suppression, definition of anatomic structures and focal lesions, diagnostic confidence for axillary and internal mammary regions and the presence of artifacts, 1 corresponding to excellent and 5 to non-diagnostic quality. Contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) measurements for muscle and focal lesions were also performed. RESULTS: Overall 161 women (mean age 51.6 ± 12.0 years) underwent 189 MR examinations, 113 with the fat saturation and 76 with the Dixon sequence. Interobserver variability was good (kappa = 0.757). In all subjectively evaluated parameters, the Dixon sequence was superior to the fat sat (p < 0.05). Mean values of CNR for muscle and focal lesions were 9.98 (±4.2), 17.9 (±7.53) for the fat sat and 18.3 (±10.4) and 29.3 (±14.1) for the Dixon sequence, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 3D T1 Dixon sequence is superior to fat sat for dedicated breast MRI at 3 T, in terms of efficiency of fat suppression and image quality with the added advantage of optimal exploration of the axillary areas.