Molecular Correlates of Prostate Cancer Visibility on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to diagnose and stage prostate cancer (PCa), the biologic and clinical significance of MRI visibility of the disease is unclear. Our aim was to examine the existing knowledge regarding the molecular correlates of MRI visibility of PCa. METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried through November 2023. We defined MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions based on the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, and compared these based on the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characteristics. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: From 2015 individual records, 25 were selected for qualitative data synthesis. Current evidence supports the polygenic nature of MRI visibility, primarily influenced by genes related to stroma, adhesion, and cellular organization. Several gene signatures related to MRI visibility were associated with oncologic outcomes, which support that tumors appearing as PI-RADS 4-5 lesions harbor lethal disease. Accordingly, MRI-invisible tumors detected by systematic biopsies were, generally, less aggressive and had a more favorable prognosis; however, some MRI-invisible tumors harbored molecular features of biologically aggressive PCa. Among the commercially available prognostic gene panels, only Decipher was strongly associated with MRI visibility. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: High PI-RADS score is associated with biologically and clinically aggressive PCa molecular phenotypes, and could potentially be used as a biomarker. However, MRI-invisible lesions can harbor adverse features, advocating the continued use of systemic biopsies. Further research to refine the integration of imaging data to prognostic assessment is warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY: Magnetic resonance imaging visibility of prostate cancer is a polygenic trait. Higher Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores are associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive cancer.

Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and Their Current Role in the Identification and Comparison of Gleason Patterns in Prostate Cancer Histopathology: A Comprehensive Review.

The development of the Gleason grading system has proven to be an irreplaceable tool in prostate cancer diagnostics within urology. Despite the advancements and developments in diagnostics, there remains a discrepancy in the grading process among even the most experienced pathologists. AI algorithms have demonstrated potential in detecting cancer and assigning Gleason grades, offering a solution to the issue of significant variability among pathologists' evaluations. Our paper explores the evolving role of AI in prostate cancer histopathology, with a key focus on outcomes and the reliability of various AI algorithms for Gleason pattern assessment. We conducted a non-systematic review of the published literature to examine the role of artificial intelligence in Gleason pattern diagnostics. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to gather pertinent information about recent advancements in artificial intelligence and their impact on Gleason patterns. We found that AI algorithms are increasingly being used to identify Gleason patterns in prostate cancer, with recent studies showing promising advancements that surpass traditional diagnostic methods. These findings highlight AI's potential to be integrated into clinical practice, enhancing pathologists' workflows and improving patient outcomes. The inter-observer variability in Gleason grading has seen an improvement in efficiency with the implementation of AI. Pathologists using AI have reported successful outcomes, demonstrating its effectiveness as a supplementary tool. While some refinements are still needed before AI can be fully implemented in clinical practice, its positive impact is anticipated soon.

Diagnostic Value Analysis of PI-RADS v2.1 Combined with ADC Values in the Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Gleason Scores: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a remarkable global health concern, necessitating accurate risk stratification for optimal treatment and outcome prediction. By highlighting the potential of imaging-based approaches to improve risk assessment in prostate cancer, this research aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 combined with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to gain increased context within the broad landscape of clinical needs and advancements in prostate cancer management. METHODS: The clinical data of 145 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into low-moderate- and high-risk groups on the basis of Gleason scores. PI-RADS v2.1 scores were assessed by senior radiologists and ADC values were calculated by using diffusion-weighted imaging. Statistical, univariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were employed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each index and combined PI-RADS v2.1 scores and ADC values. RESULTS: This study found significant differences in PI-RADS v2.1 scores and ADC values between the low-moderate- and high-risk groups (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed associations of various clinical indicators, PI-RADS score and ADC values with Gleason risk classification. Amongst indices, mean ADC demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.912) and area under curve (AUC) value (0.962) and the combination of PI-RADS v2.1 with mean ADC showed high predictive value for the Gleason risk grading of prostate cancer with a high AUC value (0.966). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable evidence for the potential utility of imaging-based approaches, specifically PI-RADS v2.1 combined with ADC values, in enhancing the accuracy of risk stratification in prostate cancer.

Life Expectancy in High-Grade Incidental Prostate Cancer Patients Versus Population-Based Controls According to Treatment Type.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) between high-grade (Gleason sum 8-10) incidental prostate cancer (IPCa) patients and age-matched male population-based controls, according to treatment type: no active versus active treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015) to identify not actively treated and actively treated high-grade IPCa patients. For each case, we simulated an age-matched male control (Monte Carlo simulation), relying on Social Security Administration Life Tables (2004-2020) with 5 years of follow-up. Additionally, we relied on Kaplan-Meier plots to display OS for each treatment type. Multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to predict overall mortality (OM). RESULTS: Of 564 high-grade IPCa patients, 345 (61%) were not actively treated versus 219 (39%) were actively treated, either with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Median OS was 3 years for not actively treated high-grade IPCa patients, with OS difference at 5 years follow-up of 27% relative to their age-matched male population-based controls (37% vs. 64%). Median OS was 8 years for actively treated high-grade IPCa patients, with OS difference at 5 years follow-up of 6% relative to their age-matched male population-based controls (68% vs. 74%). In the multivariable Cox regression model, active treatment independently predicted lower OM (hazard ratio = 0.6; 95% confidence interval = 0.4-0.8; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Relative to Life Tables' derived age-matched male controls, not actively treated high-grade IPCa patients exhibit drastically worse OS than their actively treated counterparts. These observations may encourage clinicians to consider active treatment in newly diagnosed high-grade IPCa patients.

Application of proton density fat fraction imaging in risk stratification of prostate cancer.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) as one of the most prevalent malignancies in men. We introduced a non-invasive quantitative measurement of intraprostatic fat content based on magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction (PDFF) imaging. The study aims to determine the fat fraction (FF) of PCa using proton density magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), gather clinical and routine MRI characteristics, and identify risk factors for high-risk PCa through multifactorial logistic regression. Methods: Clinical and imaging data from 191 pathologically confirmed PCa patients were collected. Patients were stratified based on Gleason score (GS), with 63 in the intermediate- and low-risk group (GS =3+3, 3+4) and 128 in the high-risk group (GS ≥4+3). All patients underwent routine prostate MRI and FF imaging. Clinical and imaging data related to PCa were analyzed, including age, body mass index (BMI), prostate volume (PV) measured by MRI, smoking history, alcohol history, diabetes history, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, T2 signal intensity (T2SI), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 2.1 (PI-RADS 2.1) score, GS, lesion FF, whole gland FF, periprostatic fat thickness (PPFT), and subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT). Independent risk factors for stratifying PCa risk were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a predictive model was established. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted for visual analysis. Results: Significant differences were found in BMI, PV, PSA, tumor ADC value, standard T2SI, PI-RADS score, lesion FF, and PPFT between low- and medium-risk and high-risk groups (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in age, smoking history, drinking history, diabetes history, and SFT between the two groups (P>0.05). GS correlated significantly with FF (ρ=0.6, P<0.001), PSA (ρ=0.432, P<0.001), ADC value (ρ=-0.379, P<0.001), and PI-RADS (ρ=0.366, P<0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that an increase in FF, a PI-RADS score increase of 5 points, and a decrease in ADC value and PV were independent predictors of high-risk PCa (P<0.05). The ROC curve showed that the best cut-off value for the model was 0.67, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.907, sensitivity of 78.1%, and specificity of 88.9%. Conclusions: The FF of PCa determined by proton density MRI is significantly associated with GS, serving as an independent predictor of high-risk PCa.

Advancements in Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: A Review.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent and deadly cancers among men, particularly affecting men of African descent and contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. The disease varies widely, from slow-developing forms to highly aggressive or potentially fatal variants. Accurate risk stratification is crucial for making therapeutic decisions and designing adequate clinical trials. This review assesses a broad spectrum of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, many of which are incorporated into clinical guidelines, including the Prostate Health Index (PHI), 4Kscore, STHLM3, PCA3, SelectMDx, ExoDx Prostate Intelliscore (EPI), and MiPS. It also highlights emerging biomarkers with preclinical support, such as urinary non-coding RNAs and DNA methylation patterns. Additionally, the review explores the role of tumor-associated microbiota in PCa, offering new insights into its potential contributions to disease understanding. By examining the latest advancements in PCa biomarkers, this review enhances understanding their roles in disease management.

Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Nigeria: a mixed methods systematic review.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) is an increasing burden in Sub-Saharan Africa. This systematic review examined the incidence, prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of PCa in Nigeria. METHODS: This review followed the standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Peer-reviewed observational studies that focused on epidemiology of PCa in Nigeria, published between 1990 and 2023 and written in English were eligible. Combination of keywords was used to search PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, AJOL and web of science databases. A piloted form by the Cochrane Public Health Group Data Extraction and Assessment Template was used to extract data from retrieved studies. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. RESULTS: Of the 1898 articles retrieved, 21 met the inclusion criteria. All included studies showed good quality. Mean age for PCa ranged from 55 to 71 years, with a higher prevalence occurring within 60-69 years. A 7.7 fold increase in PCa incidence was reported for the years 1997-2006, while an average annual increase in incidence rate of 11.95% was observed from 2009 to 2013. Hospital-based prevalence of 14%-46.4% was observed for clinically active PCa. Patients presented for diagnosis with high Gleason scores and advanced PCa. High mortality (15.6%-64.0%) occurred between 6 months and 3 years of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest rising incidence and high prevalence of PCa in Nigeria. Advanced PCa was most common at diagnosis and mortality was high. There is need for improved strategies and policies for early detection of PCa in Nigeria.

UQCRB and LBH are correlated with Gleason score progression in prostate cancer: Spatial transcriptomics and experimental validation.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a multifocal disease characterized by genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity within a single gland. In this study, Visium spatial transcriptomics (ST) analysis was applied to PCa tissues with different histological structures to infer the molecular events involved in Gleason score (GS) progression. The spots in tissue sections were classified into various groups using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Louvain clustering analysis based on transcriptome data. Anotation of the spots according to GS revealed notable similarities between transcriptomic profiles and histologically identifiable structures. The accuracy of macroscopic GS determination was bioinformatically verified through malignancy-related feature analysis, specifically inferred copy number variation (inferCNV), as well as developmental trajectory analyses, such as diffusion pseudotime (DPT) and partition-based graph abstraction (PAGA). Genes related to GS progression were identified from the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) through pairwise comparisons of groups along a GS gradient. The proteins encoded by the representative oncogenes UQCRB and LBH were found to be highly expressed in advanced-stage PCa tissues. Knockdown of their mRNAs significantly suppressed PCa cell proliferation and invasion. These findings were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas Prostate Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-PRAD) dataset, as well as through histological and cytological experiments. The results presented here establish a foundation for ST-based evaluation of GS progression and provide valuable insights into the GS progression-related genes UQCRB and LBH.

Fast Multiphoton Microscopic Imaging Joint Image Super-Resolution for Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancers.

Gleason grading system is dependable for quantifying prostate cancer. This paper introduces a fast multiphoton microscopic imaging method via deep learning for automatic Gleason grading. Due to the contradiction between multiphoton microscopy (MPM) imaging speed and quality, a deep learning architecture (SwinIR) is used for image super-resolution to address this issue. The quality of low-resolution image is improved, which increased the acquisition speed from 7.55 s per frame to 0.24 s per frame. A classification network (Swin Transformer) was introduced for automated Gleason grading. The classification accuracy and Macro-F1 achieved by training on high-resolution images are respectively 90.9% and 90.9%. For training on super-resolution images, the classification accuracy and Macro-F1 are respectively 89.9% and 89.9%. It shows that super-resolution image can provide a comparable performance to high-resolution image. Our results suggested that MPM joint image super-resolution and automatic classification methods hold the potential to be a real-time clinical diagnostic tool for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy from primary tumour characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: To construct and externally calibrate a predictive model for early biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) incorporating clinical and modern imaging characteristics of the primary tumour. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent RP following multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate biopsy and prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT), from two centres in Australia and the Netherlands. The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), where BCR was defined as a rising PSA level of ≥0.2 ng/mL or initiation of postoperative treatment per clinician discretion. Proportional hazards models to predict time to event were developed in the Australian sample using relevant pre- and post-surgical parameters and primary tumour maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) on diagnostic PSMA-PET/CT. Calibration was assessed in an external dataset from the Netherlands with the same inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Data from 846 patients were used to develop the models. Tumour SUVmax was associated with worse predicted 3-year BRFS for both pre- and post-surgical models. SUVmax change from 4 to 16 lessened the predicted 3-year BRFS from 66% to 42% for a patient aged 65 years with typical pre-surgical parameters (PSA level 8 ng/mL, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score 4/5 and biopsy Gleason score ≥4 + 5). Considering post-surgical variables, a patient with the same age and PSA level but pathological stage pT3a, RP Gleason score ≥4 + 5 and negative margins, SUVmax change from 4 to 16 lessened the predicted 3-year BRFS from 76% to 61%. Calibration on an external sample (n = 464) showed reasonable performance; however, a tendency to overestimate survival in patients with good prognostic factors was observed. CONCLUSION: Tumour SUVmax on diagnostic PSMA-PET/CT has utility additional to commonly recognised variables for prediction of BRFS after RP.

Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.

Accurate identification of prostate cancer Gleason grade group remains an important component of the initial management of clinically localized disease. However, Gleason score upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy can occur in up to a third of patients treated with surgery. Concern for disease undergrading remains a source of diagnostic uncertainty, contributing to both over-treatment of low-risk disease as well as under-treatment of higher-risk prostate cancer. This review examines the published literature concerning risk factors for GSU from time of biopsy to prostatectomy final pathology. Risk factors identified for Gleason upgrading include patient demographic and clinical factors including age, body mass index, race, prostate volume, and biomarker based assays, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and testosterone values. In addition, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have also been associated with GSU. Biopsy-specific characteristics associated with GSU include lower number of biopsy cores and lack of targeted methodology, and possibly increasing percent biopsy core positivity. Recognition of risk factors for disease undergrading may prompt confirmatory testing including repeat sampling or imaging. Continued refinements in imaging guided biopsy techniques may also reduce sampling error contributing to undergrading.

Establishing a model predicting Gleason grade group upgrading in prostate cancer.

Background: Gleason grade group (GG) upgrading is associated with increased biochemical recurrence (BCR), local progression, and decreased cancer-specific survival (CSS) in prostate cancer (PCa). However, descriptions of the risk factors of GG upgrading are scarce. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors and establish a model to predict GG upgrading. Methods: There were 361 patients with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy between May 2011 and February 2022 enrolled. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were identified and nomogram further narrowed down the contributing factors in GG upgrading. The correction curve and decision curve were used to assess the model. Results: In the overall cohort, 141 patients had GG upgrading. But the subgroup cohort (GG ≤2) showed that 68 patients had GG upgrading. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that in the overall cohort, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) ≥10 ng/mL, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) >379.50, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >2.13, the GG of biopsy ≥3, the number of positive cores >3 were independent risk factors in GG upgrading. In the cohort of biopsy GG ≤2, multivariate logistic regression showed that the tPSA ≥10 ng/mL, SII >379.50 and the number of positive cores >3 were independent risk factors in GG upgrading. A novel model predicting GG upgrading was established based on these three parameters. The area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model was 0.759. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.768. The calibration curves of the model showed good predictive performance. Clinical decision curves indicated clinical benefit in the interval of 20% to 90% of threshold probability and good clinical utility. Conclusions: Combined levels of tPSA, SII and the positive biopsy cores distinguish patients with high-risk GG upgrading in the group of biopsy GG ≤2 and are helpful in the decision of treatment plans.

A novel assessment of whole-mount Gleason grading in prostate cancer to identify candidates for radical prostatectomy: a machine learning-based multiomics study.

Purpose: This study aims to assess whole-mount Gleason grading (GG) in prostate cancer (PCa) accurately using a multiomics machine learning (ML) model and to compare its performance with biopsy-proven GG (bxGG) assessment. Materials and Methods: A total of 146 patients with PCa recruited in a pilot study of a prospective clinical trial (NCT02659527) were retrospectively included in the side study, all of whom underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 integrated positron emission tomography (PET) / magnetic resonance (MR) before radical prostatectomy (RP) between May 2014 and April 2020. To establish a multiomics ML model, we quantified PET radiomics features, pathway-level genomics features from whole exome sequencing, and pathomics features derived from immunohistochemical staining of 11 biomarkers. Based on the multiomics dataset, five ML models were established and validated using 100-fold Monte Carlo cross-validation. Results: Among five ML models, the random forest (RF) model performed best in terms of the area under the curve (AUC). Compared to bxGG assessment alone, the RF model was superior in terms of AUC (0.87 vs 0.75), specificity (0.72 vs 0.61), positive predictive value (0.79 vs 0.75), and accuracy (0.78 vs 0.77) and showed slightly decreased sensitivity (0.83 vs 0.89) and negative predictive value (0.80 vs 0.81). Among the feature categories, bxGG was identified as the most important feature, followed by pathomics, clinical, radiomics and genomics features. The three important individual features were bxGG, PSA staining and one intensity-related radiomics feature. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate a superior assessment of the developed multiomics-based ML model in whole-mount GG compared to the current clinical baseline of bxGG. This enables personalized patient management by identifying high-risk PCa patients for RP.

The Clinical Predictors of Malignancy in the Prostate Gland and Their Correlation With Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels.

Background and objective The prostate gland, which plays a crucial role in the male reproductive system, has a complex structure and function. Prostate enlargement, often benign but occasionally malignant, poses significant health concerns, particularly in aging populations. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serves as a vital biomarker, reflecting changes in prostate architecture and aiding diagnostic stratification. Elevated PSA levels correlate with prostate pathology and standard grading systems such as Gleason grading help guide treatment decisions. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between prostate enlargement, PSA levels, and Gleason grades, particularly within the Indian context. Materials and methods This study was conducted over one and a half years at the Department of Pathology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, and involved 100 cases of clinically enlarged prostates. Clinical data, including age, symptoms, and relevant features, were collected, and histopathological analysis was performed on biopsy specimens. Statistical analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel and SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Our study identified possible links between several factors and prostate conditions. Non-vegetarian diets showed a potential association with increased adenocarcinoma prevalence (p = 0.179). Urinary symptoms like hesitancy, incomplete voiding, retention, frequency, and urgency were significantly more common in men with adenocarcinoma (p<0.05). Additionally, bone pain and abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) findings strongly correlated with adenocarcinoma (p<0.001). As expected, age showed a positive correlation with prostate weight and PSA levels (p<0.01). Interestingly, bone pain was associated with a lower likelihood of other prostate symptoms (p = 0.023). Conclusions Our findings provide key insights into the clinical factors associated with prostate pathology and highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to diagnosis in these patients, integrating clinical evaluation and histopathological assessment.

Prostate Type Malignancies Arising in Ovarian Teratomas - A Report of Two Patients.

The identification of benign prostatic tissue within ovarian and testicular mature teratomas is an unusual occurrence. While a few documented reports exist in the literature regarding the emergence of benign prostatic tissue within teratomas, the occurrence of prostatic-type adenocarcinoma in a mature ovarian teratoma is an exceptionally rare phenomenon. To date, only two prior reports have documented such instances, and no tumors have been previously reported with prostate-type tissue with morphologically two different malignancies. We outline our experience with two tumors involving prostatic-type carcinoma, both arising in ovarian mature teratomas. Microscopic examination of the first tumor revealed small areas of infiltrative atypical glandular proliferation within the mature teratoma. In the second tumor, prostate-type tissue exhibited a low-grade basal cell carcinoma. Additionally, adjacent minute foci of adenocarcinoma of the prostate (Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7, <5% pattern 4) were identified. Goblet cell adenocarcinoma of appendiceal type was also evident in the latter tumor. In both tumors, immunostains (NKX3.1, PSA) were performed to establish the prostatic origin of these atypical glands and PIN4 was performed to document the absence of basal cell in the atypical glands. On clinical follow-up, both patients have no signs of recurrence at 14 and 11 months after the surgery. Further reports on such neoplasms would contribute to a better understanding of the prognosis and management of such occurrences.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Positron Emission Tomography-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen.

Prostate cancer represents a significant public health challenge, with its management requiring precise diagnostic and prognostic tools. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a cell surface enzyme overexpressed in prostate cancer cells, has emerged as a pivotal biomarker. PSMA's ability to increase the sensitivity of PET imaging has revolutionized its application in the clinical management of prostate cancer. The advancements in PET-PSMA imaging technologies and methodologies, including the development of PSMA-targeted radiotracers and optimized imaging protocols, led to diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility across different stages of prostate cancer. This highlights its superiority in staging and its comparative effectiveness against conventional imaging modalities. This paper analyzes the impact of PET-PSMA on prostate cancer management, discussing the existing challenges and suggesting future research directions. The integration of recent studies and reviews underscores the evolving understanding of PET-PSMA imaging, marking its significant but still expanding role in clinical practice. This comprehensive review serves as a crucial resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the multifaceted domains of prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management.

The value of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Background: Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) is a fast, standardized, and robust novel quantitative technique that has the potential to circumvent the subjectivity of interpretation in prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and the limitations of existing MRI quantification techniques. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential utility of SyMRI in the diagnosis and aggressiveness assessment of prostate cancer (PCA). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 309 patients with suspected PCA who had undergone mpMRI and SyMRI, and pathologic results were obtained by biopsy or PCA radical prostatectomy (RP). Pathological types were classified as PCA, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), or peripheral zone (PZ) inflammation. According to the Gleason Score (GS), PCA was divided into groups of intermediate-to-high risk (GS ≥4+3) and low-risk (GS ≤3+4). Patients with biopsy-confirmed low-risk PCA were further divided into upgraded and nonupgraded groups based on the GS changes of the RP results. The values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T1, T2 and proton density (PD) of these lesions were measured on ADC and SyMRI parameter maps by two physicians; these values were compared between PCA and BPH or inflammation, between the intermediate-to-high-risk and low-risk PCA groups, and between the upgraded and nonupgraded PCA groups. The risk factors affecting GS grades were identified via univariate analysis. The effects of confounding factors were excluded through multivariate logistic regression analysis, and independent predictive factors were calculated. Subsequently, the ADC+Sy(T2+PD) combined models for predicting PCA risk grade or GS upgrade were constructed through data processing analysis. The diagnostic performance of each parameter and the ADC+Sy(T2+PD) model was analyzed. The calibration curve was calculated by the bootstrapping internal validation method (200 bootstrap resamples). Results: The T1, T2, and PD values of PCA were significantly lower than those of BPH or inflammation (P≤0.001) in both the PZ or transitional zone. Among the 178 patients with PCA, intermediate-to-high-risk PCA group had significantly higher T1, T2, and PD values but lower ADC values compared with the low-risk group (P<0.05), and the diagnostic efficacy of each single parameter was similar (P>0.05). The ADC+Sy(T2+PD) model showed the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) 0.110 [AUC =0.818; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.754-0.872] higher than that of ADC alone (AUC =0.708; 95% CI: 0.635-0.774) (P=0.003). Among the 68 patients initially classified as PCA in the low-risk group by biopsy, PCA in the postoperative upgraded GS group had significantly higher T1, T2, and PD values but lower ADC values than did those in the nonupgraded group (P<0.01). In addition, the ADC+Sy(T2+PD) model better predicted the upgrade of GS, with a significant increase in AUC of 0.204 (AUC =0.947; 95% CI: 0.864-0.987) compared with ADC alone (AUC =0.743; 95% CI: 0.622-0.841) (P<0.001). Conclusions: Quantitative parameters (T1, T2, and PD) derived from SyMRI can help differentiate PCA from non-PCA. Combining SyMRI parameters with ADC significantly improved the ability to differentiate between intermediate-to-high risk PCA from low-risk PCA and could predict the upgrade of low-risk PCA as confirmed by biopsy.

Addressing intra- and inter-institution variability of a radiomic framework based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a highly heterogeneous disease, making tailored treatment approaches challenging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), notably diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the derived Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps, plays a crucial role in PCa characterization. In this context, radiomics is a very promising approach able to disclose insights from MRI data. However, the sensitivity of radiomic features to MRI settings, encompassing DWI protocols and multicenter variations, requires the development of robust and generalizable models. PURPOSE: To develop a comprehensive radiomics framework for noninvasive PCa characterization using ADC maps, focusing on identifying reliable imaging biomarkers against intra- and inter-institution variations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two patient cohorts, including an internal cohort (118 PCa patients) used for both training (75%) and hold-out testing (25%), and an external cohort (50 PCa patients) for independent testing, were employed in the study. DWI images were acquired with three different DWI protocols on two different MRI scanners: two DWI protocols acquired on a 1.5-T scanner for the internal cohort, and one DWI protocol acquired on a 3-T scanner for the external cohort. One hundred and seven radiomics features (i.e., shape, first order, texture) were extracted from ADC maps of the whole prostate gland. To address variations in DWI protocols and multicenter variability, a dedicated pipeline, including two-way ANOVA, sequential-feature-selection (SFS), and ComBat features harmonization was implemented. Mann-Whitney U-tests (α = 0.05) were performed to find statistically significant features dividing patients with different tumor characteristics in terms of Gleason score (GS) and T-stage. Support-Vector-Machine models were then developed to predict GS and T-stage, and the performance was assessed through the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating-characteristic curves. RESULTS: Downstream of ANOVA, two subsets of 38 and 41 features stable against DWI protocol were identified for GS and T-stage, respectively. Among these, SFS revealed the most predictive features, yielding an AUC of 0.75 (GS) and 0.70 (T-stage) in the hold-out test. Employing ComBat harmonization improved the external-test performance of the GS model, raising AUC from 0.72 to 0.78. CONCLUSION: By incorporating stable features with a harmonization procedure and validating the model on an external dataset, model robustness, and generalizability were assessed, highlighting the potential of ADC and radiomics for PCa characterization.

Assessing the Performance of Deep Learning for Automated Gleason Grading in Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer is a dominant health concern calling for advanced diagnostic tools. Utilizing digital pathology and artificial intelligence, this study explores the potential of 11 deep neural network architectures for automated Gleason grading in prostate carcinoma focusing on comparing traditional and recent architectures. A standardized image classification pipeline, based on the AUCMEDI framework, facilitated robust evaluation using an in-house dataset consisting of 34,264 annotated tissue tiles. The results indicated varying sensitivity across architectures, with ConvNeXt demonstrating the strongest performance. Notably, newer architectures achieved superior performance, even though with challenges in differentiating closely related Gleason grades. The ConvNeXt model was capable of learning a balance between complexity and generalizability. Overall, this study lays the groundwork for enhanced Gleason grading systems, potentially improving diagnostic efficiency for prostate cancer.

Patients ask and pathologists answer: ten questions around prostate cancer grading.

Pathologists have closely collaborated with clinicians, mainly urologists, to update the Gleason grading system to reflect the current practice and approach in prostate cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This has led to the development of what is called patient advocacy and patient information. Ten common questions asked by patients to pathologists concerning PCa grading and the answers given by the latter are reported.