Myocardial glucose suppression may interfere with the detection of inflammatory cells with FDG-PET as suggested in a canine model of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: After myocardial infarction, fibrosis and an ongoing dysregulated inflammatory response have been shown to lead to adverse cardiac remodeling. FDG PET is an imaging modality sensitive to inflammation as long as suppression protocols are observed while gadolinium enhanced MRI can be used to determine extracellular volume (ECV), a measure of fibrosis. In patients, glucose suppression is achieved variously through a high fat diet, fasting and injection of heparin. To emulate this process in canines, a heparin injection and lipid infusion are used, leading to similar fatty acids in the blood. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of glucose suppression on the uptake of FDG in the infarcted myocardial tissue and also on the determination of ECV in both the infarcted tissue and in the myocardium remote to the zone of infarction during a long constant infusion of FDG and Gd-DTPA. RESULTS: Extracellular volume was affected neither by suppression nor the length of the constant infusion in remote and infarcted tissue. Metabolic rate of glucose in infarcted tissue decreased during and after suppression of glucose uptake by lipid infusion and heparin injection. An increase in fibrosis and inflammatory cells was found in the center of the infarct as compared to remote tissue. CONCLUSION: The decrease in the metabolic rate of glucose in the infarcted tissue suggests that inflammatory cells may be affected by glucose suppression through heparin injection and lipid infusion.

Safety of 8-weeks oral administration of Arctium lappa L.

Recently, worldwide dietary reference intakes have been considered an important guideline for public health. Some governments and the World Health Organization (WHO) provide guidelines concerning dietary intake. Although an ingredient may have a history of use as a culinary material, changes in the environment over time suggest that the acceptable maximum intake each of food/culinary material should be regularly evaluated. Arctium lappa L. has been used as a culinary material for many centuries in Korea and Japan and some recent studies have reported related therapeutic effects. However, there are no reports on the safety of repeated oral administration. In this study, we evaluated the safety of a 8-weeks repeated oral intake of A. lappa. We concluded that treatment with <250 mg/kg A. lappa, which was within the safety range, resulted in body weight decrease and blood glucose suppression.

Biochemical assessment of disease control in acromegaly: reappraisal of the glucose suppression test in somatostatin analogue (SA) treated patients.

BACKGROUND: It is recommended not to measure growth hormone during oral glucose suppression (oral glucose tolerance test) during somatostatin analog treatment in acromegaly. However, we have observed that failure to suppress growth hormone in response to oral glucose tolerance test during somatostatin analog unmasks insufficient disease control and hypothesize that somatostatin analog also induces insufficient growth hormone suppression to mixed meals. METHODS: We therefore compared serum growth hormone levels during two mixed meals in patients with controlled insulin-like growth factor-I levels after either surgery alone (n = 9) or somatostatin analog treatment (n = 9). The patients were unbiasedly matched for gender and insulin-like growth factor-I and studied twice in the following order: (1) during a 6 h growth hormone day curve including two mixed meals and (2) during a 3 h growth hormone profile including 60 min fasting followed by a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: During the day curve growth hormone levels were elevated in the somatostatin analog group (P = 0.008) and growth hormone levels 1 h after each meal declined significantly only in the surgery group (P = 0.02). During the oral glucose tolerance test the two groups had similar growth hormone levels prior to the glucose load (P = 0.6), whereas a significant 66% suppression was observed after glucose only in the surgery group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Patients controlled by somatostatin analog fail to suppress growth hormone in response to both mixed meals and oral glucose tolerance test (2) This phenomenon is likely to result in elevated serum growth hormone levels during everyday life in somatostatin analog-treated patients, (3) We postulate that measuring growth hormone levels during oral glucose tolerance test is useful to unmask potential somatostatin analog under-treatment in the presence of 'safe' insulin-like growth factor-I levels.