Tell Me More® As A Tool for Provider Connectedness With Hospitalized Patients: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Rates of burnout and compassion fatigue in healthcare professionals have remained high since the beginning of the pandemic with adverse implications for patient care. Tell Me More® (TMM) is a tool licensed by the Gold Foundation, which was created with the purpose of helping patients, caregivers, and hospital staff to connect with each other on a humanistic level. Research has shown the benefits of the TMM with students and anecdotally with patients. This mixed-method study, which consisted of surveys and semistructured interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 72), sought out to understand the impact of implementation of TMM on a hospital floor. Surveys were distributed before and after the occurrence of TMM with interviews only occurring afterward. Three out of 8 survey items were found to be significant. Content analysis from interviews generated 4 themes from participants which included "Connectedness to Patient," "Separation of Person and Illness," "Communication with Patient's Support Network," and "Connectedness with Non-Verbal Patients." TMM is a useful tool for strengthening provider-patient relationships in hospital settings and may therefore lessen compassion fatigue and burnout.

Teaching Moral Courage & Rights-Based Leadership in Medicine: A Cross-Disciplinary Exploration.

Clinical medicine's complexities and demands often surpass the scope of formal ethics and leadership training that medical schools and residency programs provide. The discrepancy between medical education and the realities of clinical work may contribute to ethical erosion among learners, namely, medical students and residents. Unlike traditional approaches to teaching professional ethics and leadership in medicine, rights-based (aspirational) pedagogies approach trainees as autonomous moral agents, whose work has moral value to themselves and others, who live with the ethical consequences of their professional choices, and whose work shapes their individual moral character. By incorporating teaching strategies that intentionally build learners' rights-based leadership through the development of moral courage, medical educators may counter important aspects of ethical erosion while promoting learner preparedness, outcomes, and well-being. Military teaching approaches offer a valuable example to medical educators seeking to create structured curricula that foster moral courage to promote rights-based leadership, given the high level of moral and managerial complexity present in both medicine and the military. Through a comparative analysis of professional ethics in the medical and military disciplines, this Observation article explores the validity of applying precedents from military ethics and leadership education to medical training. Through arguments rooted in moral philosophy, military history, and military organizational research, we explore the expansion of rights-based teaching methods within the predominantly traditional and rules-based norms of medical education. In relating these findings to real-life clinical scenarios, we offer six specific, rights-based modifications to medical ethics curricula that have potential to promote morally courageous leadership and counteract the ethical erosion medical students and residents face.

Elevating Residency Match Success: The Potential Impact of a Home Program on the Surgical Match Rate.

INTRODUCTION: Home residency programs can provide medical students with opportunities for networking, mentorship, research, and exposure to surgeries. The goal of this project was to understand the potential impact of home surgical residencies on student match rates into specific surgical specialties. METHODS: This 5-year retrospective study (2019-2023) analyzed 12,916 matched applicants from 155 United States MD programs through publicly available match lists. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to determine the likelihood of students from institutions with home surgical residency programs (home programs) matching into desired surgical specialties compared to students from institutions without home programs. Additional variables included the Alpha Omega Alpha and the Gold Humanism Honor Society statuses of the medical school, the number of faculty, and the type of residency program. RESULTS: Of the matched applicants, 11,442 had home programs resulting in a 39.1% match rate into surgical specialties compared to a 22.3% match rate for students without a home program (OR: 1.76) (P < 0.001). Of the applicants with a home program compared to those without a home program, 69.2% matched into an academic residency (OR: 1.06), 7.7% matched into a community residency (OR: 0.90), 13.6% matched into a combined residency (OR: 0.95), and 2.5% matched into a military residency (OR: 1.31). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students graduating from institutions with home programs were 1.76 times more likely to match into a surgical residency program compared to those graduating from institutions without a home program. Future studies should look at how access to certain resources may influence a student's match rate.

Turkish psychometric characteristics of the humanistic practice ability of nursing scale: differences by education, working year, and professional satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Humanistic nursing practices scientifically improve the knowledge structure of nursing, enrich its theoretical system and support its development. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the humanistic practice abilities of nurses. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the psycholinguistic features, language and construct validity of the Humanistic Practice Ability of Nursing Scale and to examine it according to nurses' demographic characteristics. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a methodological type of analytical research conducted with 397 clinical nurses working in a hospital. A questionnaire including demographic information and evaluating empathy and compassion adequacy was used. Data were analyzed using explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, item-total score correlation, split-half analysis, t-test, analysis of variance and correlation analysis. RESULTS: The scale consists of 29 items and four factors, explaining 61.15% of the total variance. Factor loads were > 0.30. confirmatory factor analysis results were χ2/df: 2.58, GFI: 0.86, TLI: 0.91, IFI: 0.92, CFI: 0.92, RMSEA: 0.06, and SRMR: 0.03. The Cronbach alpha value for the full scale is 0.95. A significant relationship was found between the scale and empathy and compassion proficiency. It was observed that the scale scores differed according to the nurses' education level, working years and job satisfaction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the Turkish version of the HPAN scale is valid and reliable for 29 items and four factors. The humanistic practice ability of nurses differ according to postgraduate education, years of working in the profession and professional satisfaction.

Strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and avoid administrative stifling.

The acquisition of private medical practices by large health-care corporations is transforming clinical practice in many Western countries. The growing influence of health administration on medical practice is increasingly perceived as a danger by the public and health professionals. Health-care administrators should not replace doctors or invade their competencies. Back to principles, the patient-doctor relationship must be funded in trust. Representing society, governments must try to ensure health care to all citizens, serving one of the fundamental human rights. Using the principle of subsidiarity, administrators should fill gaps in the provision of health care to all patients by doctors.

Humanism Rounds: A Multifaceted "Back to Bedside" Initiative to Improve Meaning at Work for Internal Medicine Residents.

Introduction: Burnout is an increasingly prevalent problem among resident physicians. To address this problem, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) created the Back to Bedside initiative, supporting resident-driven projects focused on increasing direct interactions with patients. In 2017, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Internal Medicine Residency received a Back to Bedside grant to develop and implement "Humanism Rounds," a multifaceted program which sought to promote personal connections between residents and patients and foster reflection about patients' non-clinical stories, with the hopes of reducing burnout and increasing residents' sense of meaning at work. Materials and Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, internal medicine residents were instructed on and encouraged to participate in Humanism Rounds. The program included three components: taking a "human history," bedside rounds focused on non-clinical concerns, and sharing patient stories with colleagues ("celebrations"). Residents were surveyed using institutional and ACGME surveys regarding burnout, meaning at work, and the clinical learning environment. Results: Three hundred eleven institutional (response rate, 74%) and 328 AGCME (response rate, 78%) surveys were completed and analyzed. Residents who actively engaged with Humanism Rounds reported more meaning and fulfillment at work (p < 0.001). During the period of this project, ratings of the learning environment and personal callousness improved among subgroups of residents. Conclusions: Baylor College of Medicine Internal Medicine residents who engaged with Humanism Rounds reported more meaning and fulfillment in their work. This program describes a low-cost model for other specialties and institutions to strengthen human connections and improve residents' experience during training. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02017-9.

Dilemmas of intervention: From person-centred to alienation-centred dementia care.

Discussions regarding personhood and dementia care are often based on practices of recognition; on notions of being-or not being- 'one of us'. This article provides a short overview of personhood as articulated in dementia care, especially in the assemblage of practices known as 'person-centred care' (PCC), and in post-human approaches that developed following the critique of PCC. This article posits an alternative framework, based on a rereading of the concept of alienation, that we want to call 'alienation-centred care'. It considers the extent to which dynamic prosthetic networks can be adapted to the lives of people with dementia, rather than only examining the individual's reactivity to dementia interventions that define traditional approaches. It further urges us to understand the multiple origins of alienating states. Conclusions explore how this framework might address some of the limitations identified in both humanist and post-human approaches to personhood and dementia.

Los desafíos del transhumanismo a la bioética

Este artículo explora los desafíos que presenta a la bioética la emergencia del transhumanismo en Occidente. La exploración es abordada desde una perspectiva de investigación genealógica, que tiene por objetivo preguntarse por las condiciones de inteligibilidad del transhumanismo y a partir de allí analizar sus impactos en la actualización de un debate central en bioética, a saber, los límites a la manipulación de la vida humana. El transhumanismo, habitando la crisis del humanismo que le antecede y compele, reactualiza la cuestión de la condición humana presentando una línea argumental que al menos autoriza a formular de nuevo la pregunta límite: ¿podemos, o acaso debemos, ir más allá de lo humano?.

This article explores the challenges presented to bioethics by the emergence of transhumanism in the West. The exploration is approached from a genealogical research perspective. A genealogical investigation aims to question the conditions of intelligibility of transhumanism and from there analyze its impacts on the updating of a central debate in bioethics, namely: the limits to the manipulation of human life. Transhumanism, inhabiting the crisis of humanism that precedes and compels it, updates the issue of the human condition by presenting a line of argument that at least authorizes to formulate again the limit question: can we/should we go beyond the human?.

Este artigo explora os desafios apresentados à bioética pela emergência do transumanismo no Ocidente. A exploração é abordada a partir de uma perspectiva de pesquisa genealógica. Uma investigação genealógica visa indagar sobre as condições de inteligibilidade do transumanismo e a partir daí analisar seus impactos na atualização de um debate central na bioética, a saber: os limites à manipulação da vida humana. O transumanismo, habitando a crise do humanismo que o precede e o compele, atualiza a questão da condição humana ao apresentar uma linha de argumentação que ao menos nos autoriza a formular novamente a questão límite: podemos ou devemos ir além do que é humano?.

The impact of Benevolent Childhood Experiences on adult Flourishing: the mediating role of Light Triad traits.

The literature has well documented the relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences, personality traits, and well-being. However, less is known about how Benevolent Childhood Experiences (BCEs) relate to "light" personality traits and Flourishing. The study analyzed the effects of BCEs on Flourishing, considering the mediator role of Light Triad traits (Kantianism, Humanism, and Faith in Humanity). The study used a quantitative methodology with a non-experimental, cross-sectional design; 410 Honduran adults responded to the survey, including questions regarding Light Triad personality traits, Flourishing, and BCEs. On average, respondents reported 7.34 BCEs. The number of reported BCEs did not vary significantly between men and women. However, specific BCEs were categorically associated with subjects' sex. A higher proportion of men reported having at least one teacher who cared about the respondent, having opportunities to have a good time, and liking/feeling comfortable with oneself. Flourishing was significantly higher for participants who reported the presence of BCEs. The largest effect size was achieved for the difference in Flourishing scores between those who reported liking school as a child and those who disliked it. The number of Benevolent Childhood Experiences had a significant total and direct effect on Flourishing scores. Significant indirect effects were also identified. Faith in Humanity and Humanism, not Kantianism, mediated the relationship between BCEs and Flourishing. BCEs significantly explained all Light Triad traits. In conclusion, BCEs have significant direct and indirect effects on adult Flourishing; Faith in Humanity and Humanism mediate this relationship.

Where Two or Three Are Gathered.

Remembering Christ's words of His presence when two or three are gathered, a physician and a patient's wife join in prayer, knowing that Christ shares our wounds as much as He heals them.

Vocation as tragedy: Love and knowledge in the lives of the Mills, the Webers, and the Russells.

Can love affect knowledge and knowledge affect love? John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor-Mill, Max and Marianne Weber, and Bertrand and Dora Russell had a definite vocation: they wanted to change the world. They questioned traditional gender arrangements through publications on equality, marriage, and education. They were liberal thinkers, advocating individual freedom and autonomy, vis à vis the constraints of state and society. Their partnership inspired their work, a living experiment conducted through their own unconventional relationship. Over time, their increasingly radical, avant-garde ideas on marriage complicated the ongoing negotiation over power and intimacy which typified their marriages. Building on the historiography of social science couples, and by means of an analysis of the micro-social dynamics of marriage as documented in the life writings of the Mills, the Webers, and the Russells, I analyse the connections between gender, intimacy, and creativity. These couples' experiences highlight the non-rational dimension of a most rational endeavour.

"The Water in Which We Swim:" A Unique, Post-Clerkship Multidisciplinary Course.

OBJECTIVE: To improve patient outcomes and promote health equity, medical students must be taught not only biomedicine, but also the social sciences to understand the larger contexts in which patients live and health care operates. Yet, most undergraduate medical education does not explicitly cover these topics in a required, longitudinal curriculum. METHODS: In January 2015 at Harvard Medical School, we created a two-part sequence (pre- and post-clerkship) of required, 4-week multidisciplinary courses-"Essentials of the Profession I and II"-to fill this gap. "Essentials of the Profession II (EOP2)" is an advanced social sciences course anchored in patient narratives and the lived experiences of students and includes clinical epidemiology and population health, healthcare delivery and leadership, health policy, medical ethics and professionalism, and social medicine that engages students to conduct structural analyses to be effective healers, advocates, and leaders. RESULTS: Per student course evaluations, the overall course rating was 1.7 (SD 0.9, 1 = excellent and 5 = poor); its overall rating has improved over time; and it has scored well even when run virtually. It was rated highly in application of critical thinking, integration of the disciplines, and relevance for clinical work. Qualitative analyses of student responses revealed the following key course strengths: breadth of topics, teaching faculty and guest speakers, and small group discussions. The weaknesses included workload, lack of diversity of opinions, repetition, and time spent in lectures. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that EOP2 is "essential" for post-clerkship medical education. It offers an opportunity to re-ignite and enhance humanism and activism; remind students why they chose the medical profession; equip them with frameworks and toolkits to help them to overcome challenges; and devise solutions to improve health care and patient outcomes that are applicable to their future training and ongoing practice of medicine.

Examining nurses' humanistic behaviour ability and empathy levels in clinical practice: A descriptive and exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: It is critical for nurses to provide healthcare services to healthy/sick individuals with a humanistic approach and with empathy. AIMS: This research aimed to determine nurses' humanistic behaviour ability, empathy levels and related factors in clinical practice. DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional and exploratory study. METHODS: Probability sampling method was used, and 337 nurses working in two public hospitals were included in the study. Data was collected using the Humanistic Practice Ability of Nursing Scale and the Empathy Level Determination Scale. Structural equation model analysis and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the hypothesised model. This study adhered to the STROBE checklist for reporting. RESULTS: Nurses' humanistic ability and empathy level in nursing practices were found to be above average. Both the ability to act humanely in nursing practices and their empathy levels were found to be significantly higher in nurses who were married and had children. A significant relationship was found between empathy levels and humanistic behaviours. Accordingly, nurses' empathy levels positively affected their humanistic care behaviours, and the model established between the two concepts was found to be statistically appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses' empathy levels positively affect their ability to act humanistically. The result of the model established between the two concepts also supports this. Care strategies should be developed that consider factors that will improve empathetic and humanistic behaviours in nurses and maximise individualised care practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Increasing the awareness of nurses about the factors affecting humanistic behaviours and empathic attitudes while caring for individuals in clinical practice, will contribute to improving the quality of nursing care.

Presence of good humanization practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Pharmacy Services. / Presencia de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a los pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the presence of Good Humanization Practices in the care of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services and to identify the strengths and prevalent areas for improvement in the humanization of healthcare. METHODS: Online questionnaire structured in two parts was developed using Google Form®. The first one was designed to collect identifying data and the second one included questions related to compliance with the 61 standards of the Manual of Good Humanization Practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services. Access to the questionnaire was sent by email to the Heads of the Hospital Pharmacy Service of 18 hospitals. The study period was from October 2021 to October 2022. The analyzed variables were the number of criteria that were considered met, total compliance (percentage of criteria met), by strategic line and by type or level of standard, globally and grouped by regions of Spain. RESULTS: 18 Hospital Pharmacy Services were included. The overall mean of standards met was 31.1 (95% CI: 24.8-37.6) and mean total compliance was 52.1% (95% CI: 44.4-59.7). The mean compliance by strategic line was line 1 Humanization culture: 46.5% (95% CI: 35.3-57.7), line 2 Patient empowerment: 47.4% (95% CI: 37.1- 57.8), line 3 Professional care: 49.7% (95% CI: 39.8-59.1), line 4 Physical spaces and comfort: 55.6% (95% CI: 46.3-64.8) and line 5 Organization of healthcare: 63.8% (95% CI: 55.8-71.9). CONCLUSION: The average compliance with the standards is between 40 and 60%, which indicates that humanization is present in the Hospital Pharmacy Services, but there is a wide margin for improvement. The main strength in the humanization of Hospital Pharmacy Services is a patient-centered care organization, and the area with the greatest room for improvement is the culture of humanization.

The heart of anaesthesiology: revitalising humanism in the age of technology.

Technological innovation has greatly aided modern medicine, and anaesthesiology in particular, but also contributes to dehumanising influences that promote physician burnout and dissatisfaction among patients. Here we advocate for a profound reaffirmation of humanistic principles-empathy, compassion, and communication-in perioperative medicine. We propose adaptable strategies to bolster humanism in practice, such as curricular offerings, simulation training, role modelling, and recognition. As perioperative technologies continue to evolve, the threat of depersonalisation in anaesthetic care looms, making commitments to humanism a crucial precondition for healing in the communities in which we work and live.

First patient project: Engaging pathology through the donor dissection experience and its role in professionalism.

The peer-reviewed anatomical education literature thoroughly describes the benefits and drawbacks of donor dissection. Gross anatomy laboratory environments utilizing donor dissection are generally considered to be a premier environment where students foster non-traditional discipline-independent skills (NTDIS), including the acquisition of professionalism, empathy, resilience, emotional intelligence, and situational awareness. Therefore, this IRB-approved study explored the impact of a formal humanism and pathology thread, the first patient project (FPP), on the personal and professional development of pre-professional undergraduate students in a gross anatomy dissection-based course. Five reflections from each student were collected across four cohorts (n = 74 students, 370 reflections). A post-course questionnaire collected data on student perceptions of the project. The framework method was used to analyze reflection and free response data and descriptive statistics were performed on Likert-style items using Excel. Three themes were identified to encompass the impacts of the FPP on professional development and include: Socialization (through collective dissection experience and pathology), Humanistic Qualities (respect for the donor and their history, and introspection), and Content and Skills (technical and NTDIS, anatomical knowledge). The end of course FPP survey was completed by 29 students across three cohorts (65%) and their perspectives were generally favorable regarding the promotion of respect, empathy, and humanization of their donors. This study underscores the value of incorporating humanism, pathology, and reflection, facilitated through formal curriculum for pre-professional undergraduate students. It provides evidence of the positive impact on their personal and professional development, supporting the integration of NTDIS in curricula across various disciplines.

[Translated article] Good humanisation practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Pharmacy Services.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the presence of Good Humanisation Practices in the care of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services and to identify the strengths and prevalent areas for improvement in the humanisation of healthcare. METHODS: An online questionnaire structured in 2 parts was developed using Google Form®. The first one was designed to collect identifying data and the second one included questions related to compliance with the 61 standards of the Manual of Good Humanisation Practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services. Access to the questionnaire was sent by email to the Heads of the Hospital Pharmacy Service of 18 hospitals. The study period was from October 2021 to October 2022. The analysed variables were the number of criteria that were considered met, total compliance (percentage of criteria met), by strategic line and by type or level of standard, globally and grouped by regions of Spain. RESULTS: 18 Hospital Pharmacy Services were included. The overall mean of standards met was 31.1 (95% CI: 24.8-37.6) and mean total compliance was 52.1% (95% CI: 44.4%-59.7%). The mean compliance by strategic line was: Line 1, Humanisation culture: 46.5% (95% CI: 35.3%-57.7%), Line 2, Patient empowerment: 47.4% (95% CI: 37.1%-57.8%), Line 3, Professional care: 49.7% (95% CI: 39.8%-59.1%), Line 4, Physical spaces and comfort: 55.6% (95% CI: 46.3%-64.8%), and Line 5, Organisation of healthcare: 63.8% (95% CI: 55.8%-71.9%). CONCLUSION: The average compliance with the standards is between 40% and 60%, which indicates that humanisation is present in the Hospital Pharmacy Services, but there is a wide margin for improvement. The main strength in the humanisation of Hospital Pharmacy Services is a patient-centred care organisation, and the area with the greatest room for improvement is the culture of humanisation.