Efficacy of Infliximab Biosimilar for Maintenance Therapy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Following Infliximab Originator.

The safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of Infliximab biosimilar agents in the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults have been shown. These agents have been recommended for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, and although institutions are initiating therapy with the biosimilar agents (IFX-B), few are switching maintenance therapy from the originator (IFX-O). The aim was to compare biochemical markers of disease activity of children with inflammatory bowel disease on maintenance therapy with IFX-B to their previous markers on IFX-O. Methods: Single-center, retrospective chart review of 25 children with inflammatory bowel disease who transitioned from Remicade (IFX-O) to the biosimilar agent Inflectra (IFX-B) for maintenance therapy. Analysis included demographics and various biochemical markers of disease control. The nonparametric-related samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare mean ranks of these markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hemoglobin, platelet count, albumin, body mass index z score) between the last 12 months on IFX-O and the first 12 months on IFX-B. Results: Between March 2018 and June 2018, the majority of patients with pediatric inflammatory bowel disease on maintenance therapy with IFX-O at our institution were transitioned to maintenance therapy with IFX-B. Of the 25 children included, 17 were diagnosed with Crohn disease and 8 with ulcerative colitis. The results of all, except albumin value, supported retention of the null hypothesis that there would not be a statistically significant difference in the biochemical markers of disease activity between the 2 medications. Conclusions: IFX-B is as effective as IFX-O for maintenance therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease when comparing biochemical markers of disease activity.

The Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Originator Infliximab to Single or Double Switch Biosimilar Among a Nationwide Cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

Background: Data on safety and efficacy of switching to Renflexis (SB2) from originator Infliximab (IFX) (single switch) or from originator IFX to Inflectra (CT-P13) to Renflexis (double switch) are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a nationwide cohort of patient with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in remission who were switched to SB2. The main exposure was the treatment course of SB2. There are 2 levels in this variable: single switch (IFX to SB2) and double switch (IFX to CT-P13 to SB2). The outcome is SB2 drug discontinuation rate and/or not being in remission after 1 year. Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to study the efficacy difference between single switch and double switch. Results: A total of 271 IBD patients were started on SB2. Among them 52 (19.2%) patients did not achieve remission at 1 year and 14 (5.1%) patients had to discontinue SB2 due to adverse events). In logistic regression analysis after controlling for covariates, there was no statistically significant difference observed in regard to efficacy or safety of the single switch versus double switch to SB2 (adjusted odds ratio for double switch compared to single switch = 1.33 (95% confidence interval 0.74-2.41, P = 0.3432). Conclusions: Among IBD patients in remission, double switch was equally effective as compared to a single switch. This will help reassure the gastroenterologists who have concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of switching between multiple biosimilars for treating IBD.

Evolution of infliximab biosimilar in inflammatory bowel disease: from intravenous to subcutaneous CT-P13.

INTRODUCTION: Biologic drugs have significantly improved the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). However, the availability of these drugs is limited by their high cost. Infliximab was the first biologic to be approved for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). After its patent expired other manufactures developed biosimilar versions, among which CT-P13, and licensed them thorough an expedite process. AREAS COVERED: The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on CT-P13 use in IBD, with particular interest in the phase II trials of a subcutaneous version of CT-P13. EXPERT OPINION: Biosimilars, such as CT-P13, are an important resource for health-care systems. Although CT-P13 approval in IBD was based on extrapolation, subsequent studies confirmed its clinical equivalence to originator infliximab. A new subcutaneous formulation of CT-P13 showed promising results in phase I and II trials in both CD and UC. Clinical efficacy and safety were comparable and interestingly serum drug doses appeared to be more stable than conventional intravenous CT-P13. If these preliminary results will be confirmed, the first sub-cutaneous version of infliximab could soon be available for IBD.

Biosimilar infliximab administration for the management of acute graft-versus-host disease.

INTRODUCTION: Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a significant immune-mediated complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Despite prophylactic immunosuppression, the incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD post-HSCT varies from 20 to 80%. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is an important cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of GVHD, and medications such as infliximab (Remicade®) have been utilized as second-line treatment options in patients with steroid-refractory GHVD. Infliximab-dyyb (Inflectra®) and infliximab-qbtx (Ixifi®) are biosimilars approved by the FDA for a variety of autoimmune disorders. This is the first case report documenting the utility of infliximab-dyyb and -qbtx for the management of steroid-refractory aGVHD. CASE REPORT: We report the post-transplant course of three patients treated with infliximab biosimilars as a part of therapy for management of steroid-refractory aGVHD. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Steroid-refractory aGVHD is associated with poor prognosis and its management, as highlighted in our three patient cases, and can be very diverse often requiring different therapeutic modalities which overlap in administration. DISCUSSION: In these patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD, we were able to show that infliximab biosimilars could be used in lieu of the reference infliximab product. Although we had important limitations, this case report supports the use of anti-TNF agents in highly mortal steroid-refractory acute GI GVHD and that replacement of infliximab with its biosimilars is feasible.

The PROSIT Cohort of Infliximab Biosimilar in IBD: A Prolonged Follow-up on the Effectiveness and Safety Across Italy.

BACKGROUND: We report a prospective, nationwide cohort evaluating the safety and effectiveness of CT-P13. METHODS: A structured database was used to record serious adverse events (SAEs), clinical remission/response, inflammatory biomarkers (CRP and calprotectin), and endoscopic findings. RESULTS: Eight hundred ten patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (452 Crohn's disease [CD]) were enrolled. Four hundred fifty-nine patients were naïve to anti-TNFα (group A), 196 had a previous exposure (group B), and the remaining 155 were switched to CT-P13 (group C). All patients were included in the safety evaluation with a mean follow-up of 345 ± 215 days and a total number of 6501 infusions. One hundred fifty-four SAEs were reported (19%), leading to cessation of the biosimilar in 103 subjects (12.7%). Infusion reactions were 71, leading to cessation of the biosimilar in 53 subjects (6.5%), being significantly more frequent in patients pre-exposed to anti-TNFα (P = 0.017). The efficacy of therapy was calculated in 754 IBD patients, with a mean follow-up of 329 ± 202 days. Forty-eight patients had a primary failure (6.4%), and 188 (25.6%) lost response during follow-up. Six hundred twenty-eight (364 CD) and 360 IBD patients (222 CD) completed the follow-up at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At 12 months, patients without loss of response were 71%, 64%. and 82% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (log rank P = 0.01). Clinical/endoscopic scores and inflammatory biomarkers dropped significantly in CD and UC patients (P = 0.01 and P < 0.0001) compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In this large prospective cohort, no further signals of difference in safety and effectiveness of CT-P13 in IBD has been observed.

How Similar Is Biosimilar? A Comparison of Infliximab Therapeutics in Regard to Charge Variant Profile and Antigen Binding Affinity.

Biosimilars are increasing in economic importance. Just how similar a biosimilar needs to be to gain market approval is currently still decided on a per case basis. The authors try to shed light on one often cited critical quality attribute of monoclonal antibodies, namely charge heterogeneity. Using high resolution electrophoretic and chromatographic methods, the authors are able to separate and quantify the charge variant content of infliximab originator and three biosimilars. Additionally the authors quantified and compared the antigen binding affinity in an SPR based binding assay and analyzed the glycosylation pattern of all four of these infliximab biosimilar products. Even though the analytical methods did not show full similarity between originator and some biosimilars, all of the biosimilars have gained approval based on their clinical comparability. The authors would therefore argue, that analytical comparison is not always a good predictor for clinical interchangeability. Any future regulatory framework for the approval of biosimilars should reflect that the parameters chosen for analytical comparability have to be chosen carefully.

The Role of Biosimilars in Uveitis: Long-Term Real-World Outcomes of the Switch From Original to Biosimilar TNF-Alpha Inhibitors.

Background: Recent expiry of patents for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors has led to the employment of biosimilars in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to identify any change in the control of ocular inflammatory manifestations among patients with non-infectious uveitis switching from an originator to a corresponding anti-TNF-α biosimilar. Methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients (62 eyes involved) with non-infectious uveitis undergoing the switch from anti-TNF-α originators to biosimilars were retrospectively enrolled; the frequency of ocular flares before and after the switch as well as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), daily systemic corticosteroid intake, and frequency of uveitic macular edema (UME) at the switch and at the following assessments were statistically analysed. Results: The number of ocular flares during the 12 months preceding the switch was 16, corresponding to 3.6 flares/100 patients/12 months; the number of flares after the switch was 14, corresponding to 2.0 flares/100 patients/12 months. No statistically significant differences were identified in the frequency of flares (p = 0.84) and in the number of patients experiencing ocular flares (p = 0.39) between the twelve months preceding the switch and the period thereafter. No statistically significant changes were observed in the BCVA (p = 0.27), CMT (p = 0.50), frequency of UME (p = 0.57) and daily corticosteroid intake (p = 0.42) between the time of the switch and the last follow-up visit. Conclusions: The switch to biosimilars represents a feasible treatment choice associated with the maintenance of clinical efficacy in patients with non-infectious uveitis previously treated with the corresponding originator anti-TNF-α biologic agents.