The effect of dexamethasone and bupivacaine on postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting by preperitoneal nerve blocking in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: This study aims to examine the effects of preperitoneal administration of dexamethasone and bupivacaine surrounding laparoscopic trocars on postoperative pain (POP) and nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Method: In this randomized triple-blinded trial with a 1:1 randomization ratio, 104 patients with chronic cholecystitis were candidates for elective LC. A total of 40 mg (8 ml) of bupivacaine was mixed with 8 mg (2 ml) of dexamethasone or normal saline. The solution was injected preperitoneally via an 18G needle parallel and lateral to trocars until a bulge in the interior surface of the parietal peritoneum was observed by the camera. Primary outcomes were the severity of POP based on 0-10 Likert visual analog scale (VAS) and rates of PONV and secondary outcomes were rate of postoperative opioid usage and any side-effects. Result: The mean VAS score was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group (3.5 vs. 6.2, P<0.001). The dexamethasone group had 46.2% and 26.9% lower rates of nausea and vomiting after LC compared to the other group (P=0.001 and 0.015, respectively). Postoperative opioid use was lower in the dexamethasone group, but its difference was insignificant (P=0.3). Conclusions: Preperitoneal dexamethasone injection around laparoscopic trocars may lower the intensity of POP and PONV rates. Perioperative local corticosteroids can be used as an effective, available, and inexpensive analgesic and antiemetic prevention for laparoscopic procedures.

Role of Intraoperative Near-Infrared Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Cholangiography in the Management of Acute Gangrenous Cholecystitis Secondary to Empyema of the Gallbladder in Mirizzi's Syndrome.

Mirizzi syndrome, although rare, is a potential complication of long-standing gallstone disease, particularly cholecystolithiasis. Due to the nonspecific nature of its symptoms, this condition often remains undiagnosed prior to surgery in most cases. While minimally invasive approaches are generally safe in expert hands, they can be challenging and entail the risk of bile duct injuries, often necessitating conversion to bail-out procedures. Delayed management of Mirizzi syndrome can lead to serious consequences, such as empyema of the gallbladder (GB), gangrene of the GB wall, perforation, and sepsis. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence imaging during laparoscopic cholecystectomy can help delineate the biliary anatomy and prevent biliary tract injuries in difficult GBs like Mirizzi syndrome.

Hydrops Gallbladder Caused by Cystic Duct Fibrosis Leading to Mirizzi Syndrome: A Case Report.

Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is a rare complication of cholelithiasis, resulting from the extrinsic compression of the common hepatic duct or common bile duct by impacted gallstones in the cystic duct or Hartmann's pouch. MS is most commonly observed in the elderly with a long-standing history of gallstones. We present the case of MS type I diagnosed following magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Surgical management was performed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MS should be considered as a differential diagnosis in elderly patients presenting with asymptomatic obstructive jaundice. Imaging studies such as MRCP and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are essential for diagnosing. We present this case to highlight the importance of recognizing hydrops gallbladder caused by cystic duct fibrosis leading to MS.

Can Hemogram Parameters and Derived Ratios Predict Conversion From Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy?

Backgrounds Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for surgical removal of gallbladder today. In challenging cholecystectomy cases, conversion to an open technique may be necessary. Therefore, the preoperative prediction of conversion to open technique holds significant importance for patient safety and surgical strategy. In the literature, conversion to open cholecystectomy has been associated with many contradictory predictive factors. The aim of this study is to identify and comprehensively evaluate the predictive laboratory parameters and ratios associated with the conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Methods In this historical cohort study, the data of patients who were scheduled for and underwent LC between January 1, 2018, and September 1, 2023, were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative laboratory findings and surgical notes of the patients were reviewed retrospectively from the archives. The correlation between patient data and the cholecystectomy groups was analyzed, and comparisons were made between the groups. Results All 160 patients initially underwent a laparoscopic approach. In emergency cases, a statistically significant association was found between lymphocyte count (p = 0.017) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (p = 0.041) with operations completed laparoscopically and between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = 0.007) and Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) (p = 0.031) with operations converted to open surgery. In elective cases, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (p = 0.024) and total bilirubin (TBIL) (p = 0.003) were found to have a statistically significant association with operations converted to open surgery. In the logistic regression analysis, hematological parameters and ratios were not found to have a statistically significant relationship in predicting the conversion to open surgery. Conclusion Although significant differences were observed in laboratory parameters and derived ratios such as the NLR and LMR, logistic regression analysis did not identify any of these measures as significant predictors of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed in this area.

Collaborative Implementation of Robotic Surgery Into an Academic Pediatric Surgery Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery continues to drive evolution in minimally invasive surgery. Due to the confined operative fields encountered, pediatric surgeons may uniquely benefit from the precise control offered by robotic technologies compared to open and laparoscopic techniques. We describe a unique collaborative implementation of robotic surgery into an academic pediatric surgery practice through adult robotic surgeon partnership. We compare robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) outcomes, hypothesizing that RC will be equivalent to LC in key quality outcomes. METHODS: We evaluate 14 mo of systems development and training, and 24 mo of collaborative operative experience evoking a purposeful tiered case progression, establishing core robotic competencies, prior to advancing operative complexity. Univariate analyses compared LC versus RC. RESULTS: 36 robotic operations were performed in children aged 8-18 y, in a tiered progression from 24 cholecystectomies to 2 ileocecectomies, 2 paraesophageal hernia repairs, 1 anterior rectopexy, 1 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 1 Heller myotomy, 1 choledochal cyst resection with roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, 1 median arcuate ligament release, and 1 thoracic esophageal duplication cyst resection. For LC and RC, there were no significant differences in procedure duration, discharge opioids, hospital readmission, or rates of surgical site infection or bile duct injury. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery has potential to significantly enhance pediatric surgery. RC appears equivalent to LC but presents multiple additional theoretical benefits in pediatric patients. Our pilot program experience supports the feasibility and safety of pediatric robotic surgery. We emphasize the importance of a stepwise progression in operative difficulty and collaboration with adult robotic surgery experts.

Fenestrating vs reconstituting laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed procedures by general surgeons. Strategies for minimizing bile duct injuries including use of the critical view of safety method, as outlined by the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program, are not always possible. Subtotal cholecystectomy has emerged as a safe "bail-out" maneuver to avoid iatrogenic bile duct injury in these difficult cases. Strasberg and colleagues defined two main types of subtotal cholecystectomies: reconstituting and fenestrating. As there is a paucity of studies comparing the two subtypes of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the reconstituting and fenestrating techniques for managing the difficult gallbladder. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective studies comparing fenestrating and reconstituting LSC. The outcomes of interest were bile leak, reoperation, readmissions, completion cholecystectomy, postoperative ERCP, and retained CBD stones. RESULTS: We screened 2855 studies and included 13 studies with a total population of 985 patients. Among them, 330 patients (33.5%) underwent reconstituting LSC and 655 patients (55.5%) underwent fenestrating LSC. Twelve studies were retrospective, and one was prospective. Notably, reconstituting STC was associated with decreased incidence of bile leak (OR 0.29; CI 95% 0.16-0.55; p = 0.0002; I2 = 36%). We also noted increased rates of postoperative ERCP with fenestrating STC in sensitivity analysis (OR 0.32; CI 95% 0.16-0.64; p = 0.001; I2 = 31%). In addition, there was no difference between the two techniques regarding the rates of completion of cholecystectomy, reoperation, readmission, and retained CBD stones. CONCLUSIONS: Fenestrating LSC leads to a higher incidence of postoperative bile leakage. In addition, our sensitivity analysis revealed that the fenestrating technique is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative ERCP. Further randomized trials and studies with longer-term follow-up are still necessary to better understand these techniques in the difficult gallbladder cases.

Comparison of Intravenous Ondansetron and Dexamethasone for Preventing Propofol-Induced Pain During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Study.

Background Propofol is the most common induction agent used in current anesthesia practice. Patients receiving propofol injections commonly experience varying degrees of pain, creating an unpleasant anesthesia experience. Methods Seventy-two patients, aged between 18 and 70, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups. Group D received 8 mg of dexamethasone, and Group O received 8 mg of ondansetron intravenously before induction. After five seconds, mid-arm venous occlusion was applied for one minute using a tourniquet. Propofol (0.5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously over five seconds, and patients rated the injection pain over the next 15 seconds. The primary outcome was pain intensity using the Verbal Rating Scale during propofol injection. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Normally distributed variables were compared using the Student's t-test, non-normally distributed variables using the Mann-Whitney U-test, and qualitative data using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance for the study was set at p < 0.05. Results In Group D, 30 out of 36 patients (83.3%) experienced no pain, while four patients (11.1%) reported mild pain, two patients (5.6%) reported moderate pain, and no patients (0.0%) reported severe pain. In contrast, in Group O, only 15 out of 36 patients (41.6%) experienced no pain, with 12 patients (33.3%) experiencing mild pain, seven patients (19.4%) experiencing moderate pain, and two patients (5.6%) experiencing severe pain. Overall, six out of 36 patients in Group D (16.7%) experienced some level of pain, compared to 21 out of 36 patients in Group O (58.3%), a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Regarding postoperative nausea, 16 out of 36 patients in Group Dexamethasone (44.44%) experienced nausea, whereas 23 out of 36 patients in Group Ondansetron (63.88%) reported this symptom, with the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0372). Additionally, postoperative vomiting occurred in nine out of 36 patients in Group Dexamethasone (25%), compared to 18 out of 36 patients in Group Ondansetron (50%), with this difference also reaching statistical significance (p= 0.026). Conclusions Intravenous dexamethasone before propofol administration reduces injection pain and PONV in laparoscopic cholecystectomy more effectively as compared to ondansetron.

Rare anatomical variants encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low resource conditions and the convenient concept of the safe zone of dissection: a prospective observational study at a single center.

Purpose: The severity of surrounding adhesions, anomalous anatomy, and technical issues are the main factors that complicate cholecystectomy. This study focused on determining the types and frequency of laparoscopic anatomical variations found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our limited-resources condition and on defining the safe zone of dissection. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at a single center in Aden, Yemen from 2012 to 2019. A total of 375 patients, comprising 355 females (94.7%) and 20 males (5.3%), presented with symptomatic gallbladders and underwent standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The regional laparoscopic variations were evaluated and recorded. Results: Of the 375 patients, 26 (6.9%) had laparoscopic anatomical variations, of whom 19 (73.1%) had vascular variations and seven (26.9%) had ductal variations. The anatomical variations included the following: double cystic artery of separated origin, seven cases (26.9%); Moynihan's hump, six (23.1%); double cystic artery of single origin, four (15.4%); thin long cystic duct, four (15.4%); subvesical duct, three (11.5%); and cystic artery hocking the cystic duct, two (7.7%). Conclusion: Biliary anatomical variations can be expected in any dissected zone. Most of the detected variants were associated with the cystic artery. An overlooked accessory cysto-biliary communication can cause complicated biliary leakage. A surgeon's skills and knowledge of laparoscopic anatomical variants are essential for performing a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Early cholecystectomy.

In patients with acute calculous cholecystitis, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the first choice, including high risk patients. The ideal timing is surgery within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms, and the duration of the symptoms should not exceed 7-10 days. If surgery is contraindicated, percutaneous or endoscopic gallbladder drainage may be considered. Team experience and technical equipment of the unit play an important role in the choice of the most appropriate procedure.

The Role of ICG-Guided Fluorescent Mode in Boosting the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Background: The most common therapy for gallstones is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). How to help young residents avoid bile duct injuries (BDI) during surgery and grasp LC seems to be a paradox. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 145 cases of LC operated by two residents under indocyanine green (ICG)-guided mode or normal LC procedures to illustrate the role of ICG mode in boosting the LC learning curve. The clinic data were analyzed by logistic regression, receiver operator curve tests, Cumulative Sum (CUSUM), and Risk-Adjusted Cumulative Sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis. Results: The operation failure rate is similar. However, operation time under ICG mode is shorter than that under normal mode. The peak at the 49th case represented the normal resident's complete mastery of the surgery, while the peak point of ICG mode appeared at the 36th case in the fitting curve. The most significant cumulative risk (peak point) of operation failure of LC was at the 35th case in ICG LC mode, while it appeared in the 49th in normal LC mode. Conclusions: Owing to the advantage of real-time imaging and the stable success rate of cholangiography, ICG-guided LC helps residents shorten the operation time, boost the learning curve, and manage to control the operation failure rate.

Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP.

INTRODUCTION: Given the increasing interest for surgeons to reclaim the common bile duct in managing choledocholithiasis, there is a growing movement to perform common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Advantages of concomitant CBDE with cholecystectomy include fewer anesthetic events and decreased length of stay. As there is a paucity of literature evaluating the use of the robotic platform for CBDE, our study aims to compare intraoperative and post-operative outcomes between robotic-assisted one-stage and two-stage management of choledocholithiasis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from May 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023, identifying patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy and transcystic CBDE with choledochoscopy (one-stage management). Preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative variables were compared to a control group of subjects with choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with pre- or post-operative ERCP (two-stage management). Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, Student's T, or Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Fifty-three subjects who underwent one-stage management and 101 subjects who underwent two-stage management met inclusion criteria. Groups had similar demographics and medical history. Time to CBD clearance (45.2 h vs 47.0 h, p = .036), total length of stay (3.9 days vs 5.1 days, p = .007), fluoroscopy time (70.3 s vs 151.4 s, p < .001), and estimated radiation dose (23.0 mSv vs 40.3 mSv, p = .002) were significantly lower in the one-stage group compared to two-stage. Clearance rates, complication rates, and 30-day readmission rates were similar for both groups. Total length of stay and radiation exposure remained significantly lower on subanalysis comparing one-stage management to two-stage management with ERCP either before or after cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy with transcystic common bile duct exploration via choledochoscopy is a safe and feasible option in the management of choledocholithiasis. It offers a shorter time to duct clearance, shorter length of stay, and less radiation exposure when compared to two-stage management.

Assessment of Postoperative Complications and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Introduction: A common surgical technique for gallbladder disorders is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which has the benefits of less postoperative discomfort and quicker recovery. The purpose of this retrospective research was to assess postoperative outcomes and complications in patients having laparoscopic correction. Methods: In total, 200 patients who had LC at the tertiary care center between 2017 and 2022 were the subjects of a retrospective investigation. We gathered and examined data on preoperative conditions, surgical specifics, postoperative results, and demographics. Results: Notable findings from the study were as follows: (1) The average age of the patients was 47.5 years (±12.3), and there were strong correlations (P < 0.001) between age and problems. (2) Significant correlations were found between many covariates and postoperative outcomes, such as a 10% readmission rate and a mean hospital stay of 3.6 days (±1.2) (P < 0.05). (3) Different relationships were seen between the complications (P values ranging from 0.021 to <0.001), including wound infections (6%) and bile duct injuries (2.5%). Conclusion: To enhance patient care, a thorough assessment and focused treatments are required. This study sheds light on the frequency of postoperative problems and outcomes in patients receiving LC.

Anatomical Variations of the Cystic Artery and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Persisting Surgical Challenge.

Although elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common surgical procedure, it can become challenging due to multiple variants of the anatomy of both cystic artery and cystic bile duct. A 52-year-old male with a history of symptomatic cholelithiasis underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During preparation of the Calot's triangle in order to achieve the "critical view of safety", an uncommon variation of the arterial anatomy was detected. The cystic artery was found to be originating from a robust middle hepatic artery instead of the right hepatic artery. The retrograde manner of cholecystectomy helped the visualization and protection of the middle hepatic artery. This anatomic finding was confirmed per CT done postoperatively. This case constitutes a rare arterial variation, in which the cystic artery arises from the middle hepatic artery, the artery that supplies the hepatic segment IV, which itself constituted a rare variation, since it arose from the anterior branch of the right hepatic artery. This artery could be falsely ligated instead of the real cystic artery. Certain techniques can be used to enhance the surgeon's ability to distinguish and safely ligate the proper entities. Anatomic knowledge of the possible variations of arterial and bile vessels is crucial for intraoperative recognition. Dissection of the Calot's triangle and reassurance of the "critical view of safety" are mandatory dissection techniques during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Additionally, the retrograde manner of cholecystectomy can be of significant help in case of unclear anatomy in order to avoid ligation of uncertain entities during dissection.

Indocyanine green in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: utility and correlation with a preoperative risk score.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the visualization of the cystic duct-common bile duct junction with indocyanine green (ICG) among 3 groups of patients divided according to the difficulty of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Conducted at a single center, this non-randomized, prospective, observational study encompassed 168 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were assessed with a preoperative risk score to predict difficult cholecystectomies, including clinical factors and radiological findings. Three groups were identified: low, moderate, and high risk. A dose of 0.25 mg of IV ICG was administered during anesthesia induction and the different objectives were evaluated. RESULTS: The visualization of the cystic duct-common bile duct junction was achieved in 28 (100%), 113 (91.1%), and 10 (63%) patients in the low, moderate, and high-risk groups, respectively. The high-risk group had longer total operative time, higher conversion, more complications and longer hospital stay. In the surgeon's subjective assessment, ICG was considered useful in 36% of the low-risk group, 58% in the moderate-risk group, and 69% in the high-risk group. Additionally, there were no cases where ICG modified the surgeon's surgical approach in the low-risk group, compared to 11% in the moderate-risk group and 25% in the high-risk group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that in the case of difficult cholecystectomies, the visualization of the cystic duct-common bile duct junction is achieved in 63% of cases and prompts a modification of the surgical procedure in one out of four patients.

Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gallbladder disease: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has gained traction globally due to its benefits, including shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and enhanced patient experience. While concerns about patient safety, particularly related to bleeding and bile duct injury persist, the literature supports the efficacy and advantages of DCLC highlighting the need for its wider adoption in healthcare settings to optimise resources and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: This was a literature review that aims to assess the feasibility and safety of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone patients, focusing on incidence and aetiology of unexpected admissions and readmissions, as well as conversion-to-open rates. PubMed was searched for all studies focusing on DCLC between 2014 and 2024. The timeframe was specifically selected to identify recent trends and practices in this evolving field. By focusing on this specific period, the review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current practices, emerging trends, and the evolving standard of care in this area. RESULTS: This review highlights that the main causes of unexpected admission post DCLC were postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, while the implementation of anaesthetic pathways notably increased day-case rates. Studies addressing complication rates postoperatively consistently found no significant difference between day-case and in-patient procedures. CONCLUSIONS: DCLC for symptomatic gallstone patients is supported by research as safe and effective, with high success rates and patient satisfaction. Studies show minimal complications and acceptable readmission rates, suggesting that DCLC can be the standard approach for selective patients, improving outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

Application of three-dimensional visualization technology in early surgical repair of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the application value of three-dimensional (3D) visualization technology in the early surgical repair of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 15 patients who underwent early surgical repair of bile duct injury during LC with the assistance of 3D visualization technology at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Department of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2022. Postoperative efficacy and long-term follow-up outcomes were summarized. RESULTS: Before the repair surgery, 15 cases of bile duct injury during LC were evaluated using 3D visualization technology according to the Strasberg-Bismuth classification: 2 cases of type C, 4 of type E1, 3 of type E2, 3 of type E3, and 3 of type E4. Intraoperative findings were consistent with the 3D visualization reconstruction results, and all patients successfully underwent hepaticojejunostomy using Roux-en-Y anastomosis guided by the 3D visualization navigation. The time interval between LC and bile duct repair surgery ranged from 5 to 28 (14.2 ± 9.7) days. The surgical time was between 120 and 190 (156.40 ± 23.92) min, and estimated blood loss ranged from 80 to 250 (119.66 ± 47.60) mL. The length of hospital stay ranged from 12 to 25 days (median: 16 days). One patient experienced mild bile leakage after the operation, which healed with conservative treatment. All patients were followed up for 12-56 months (median: 34 months) without any loss to follow-up. During the follow-up period, no complications, such as anastomotic stricture or stone formation, were observed. CONCLUSION: The application of 3D visualization technology for preoperative evaluation and intraoperative navigation can accurately and effectively facilitate early surgical repair of bile duct injury during LC and has clinical value for promotion and application.

Two institutes' experience in laparoendoscopic "rendezvous" technique for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct: a prospective randomized comparative clinical trial.

There is still disagreement on the best treatment option for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Although there are some benefits to the single-step procedure, the "laparoendoscopic rendezvous" (LERV) technique that include a lower risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and a shorter hospital stay, the standard technique is still the two-step approach for clearing the common bile duct (CBD) using ERCP and then performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the LERV technique vs. the standard two-step approach. Four hundred thirty-six patients with symptomatized concomitant stones at both the gall bladder (GB) and the (CBD), at two gastroenterology centers in Zagazig city, Egypt, from January 2010 till April 2022, were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into two equally groups. The overall length of hospital stay was the primary outcome, and the success of CBD clearance and morbidity, particularly post-ERCP pancreatitis, were the secondary endpoints. The LERV group experienced a significantly shorter hospital stay (median 2(2-8) days compared to 4.5 (4-11) days for the two-stage approach (p < 0.001)). The two groups did not differ in terms of CBD clearing success. Also, there was no significant difference in the number of patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis between the LERV group [14 patients (6.4%)] and the two-stage approach [26 patients (11.9%)] with p value = 0.703. For patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis, the optimal treatment must be determined by the knowledge and resources that are accessible locally. Our data further supported the idea that treating patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis in one stage is a safe and successful strategy.

Minimally invasive subtotal cholecystectomy. What surgeons need to know.

Minimally invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy is among the most frequently performed abdominal surgeries. Bile duct injury is a significative complication that occurs in about 0.2-0.3% of open procedures and 0.5% of laparoscopic surgeries, with concomitant vasculobiliary injuries in 12-61% of cases. Most of these lesions occurs during challenging severe cholecystitis where the intense inflammation obscures the hepatocystic anatomy. In this case a bailout strategy such as a subtotal cholecystectomy should be considered. Subtotal cholecystectomy is a surgical technique performed to remove a portion of the gallbladder while leaving part of it behind. In such complex cholecystectomies, surgeons should be aware of this technique, and subtotal cholecystectomy should be part of their surgical armamentarium. We aim to familiarize surgeons with bailout techniques like subtotal cholecystectomy and gallbladder emptying for challenging acute cholecystectomy cases to reduce the risk of vasculobiliary injury. This multimedia article provides, a comprehensive step-by-step overview of the different possible minimally invasive subtotal cholecystectomy procedures, we outline five distinct techniques for conducting subtotal cholecystectomy, including some tips and tricks and demonstrates the usefulness of a minimally invasive approach. Finally, we emphasize the importance of carefully choosing between laparoscopic and robotic approaches and suggests using adjunctive tools, such as preoperative indocyanine green, to better identify common bile duct anatomy.

The Influence of Obesity on Cholecystectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches.

This systematic review evaluates the impact of obesity on the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy, analyzing data from five key studies. The review explores differences in operative times, complication rates, conversion rates, and recovery times among obese patients undergoing these surgical procedures. The findings indicate that while laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients tends to require longer operative times, it does not significantly increase complication rates compared to open cholecystectomy. However, the risk of conversion to open surgery is modestly elevated. The review highlights the necessity for surgical guidelines to adapt to the challenges posed by obesity, recommending advanced training and innovative technologies to improve surgical outcomes. Limitations such as study design heterogeneity and variability in defining obesity underscore the need for further research. This review contributes to optimizing surgical care strategies and improving patient outcomes in the growing demographic of obese surgical patients.