Serious Gaming for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Older Adults With Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at high risk for toxicity due to cancer treatment and increased risk for adverse events related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Unfortunately, older adults report multiple treatment-related symptoms but use few strategies to self-manage these symptoms due to erroneous beliefs related to the effectiveness of commonly taught self-management strategies. We developed a novel serious game, Managing at Home (MAH), to help older adults learn how to effectively self-manage CINV at home. OBJECTIVE: This study has 2 aims. Aim 1 is to examine changes in CINV severity, self-management behaviors, functioning, quality of life, cognitive representation, and health care use within the intervention group from baseline (T1) to completion of the study (T6). Aim 2 is to determine the efficacy of the MAH intervention by comparing differences in primary outcomes (CINV severity and health care use) and secondary outcomes (self-management behaviors, functioning, and quality of life) between the intervention and control groups at each follow-up visit (T2-T6) and completion of the study (T6). METHODS: This is a longitudinal randomized clinical trial. We will collect data from 500 older adults receiving cancer-related chemotherapy at baseline (T1) and at each treatment cycle until cycle 6 (T6). Participants will be enrolled if they are 60 years or older of age, are newly diagnosed with cancer, being treated with any chemotherapy agent with moderate or high emetic potential, are on a 2-, 3-, or 4-week treatment cycle, are proficient in English, and have a telephone. Previous diagnosis or treatment for cancer, end-stage disease with less than 6 months to live, and uncorrected visual or hearing impairment are exclusion criteria. RESULTS: This study was funded in September 2022 and received institutional review board approval in October 2022. As of July 2023, the enrollment of participants is ongoing and currently has 130 enrolled participants. Data collection and analysis will be complete in 2027. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses self-management of CINV in older adults using an innovative serious game. The MAH intervention uses simulation and gaming technology to engage older adults in active learning in order to reframe erroneous perceptions about symptom self-management. If shown to be effective, it can easily be adapted to include other cancer-related symptoms or other chronic illnesses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05838638; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05838638. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/64673.

The effect of dexamethasone and bupivacaine on postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting by preperitoneal nerve blocking in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: This study aims to examine the effects of preperitoneal administration of dexamethasone and bupivacaine surrounding laparoscopic trocars on postoperative pain (POP) and nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Method: In this randomized triple-blinded trial with a 1:1 randomization ratio, 104 patients with chronic cholecystitis were candidates for elective LC. A total of 40 mg (8 ml) of bupivacaine was mixed with 8 mg (2 ml) of dexamethasone or normal saline. The solution was injected preperitoneally via an 18G needle parallel and lateral to trocars until a bulge in the interior surface of the parietal peritoneum was observed by the camera. Primary outcomes were the severity of POP based on 0-10 Likert visual analog scale (VAS) and rates of PONV and secondary outcomes were rate of postoperative opioid usage and any side-effects. Result: The mean VAS score was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group (3.5 vs. 6.2, P<0.001). The dexamethasone group had 46.2% and 26.9% lower rates of nausea and vomiting after LC compared to the other group (P=0.001 and 0.015, respectively). Postoperative opioid use was lower in the dexamethasone group, but its difference was insignificant (P=0.3). Conclusions: Preperitoneal dexamethasone injection around laparoscopic trocars may lower the intensity of POP and PONV rates. Perioperative local corticosteroids can be used as an effective, available, and inexpensive analgesic and antiemetic prevention for laparoscopic procedures.

A randomised controlled trial to compare the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in early versus conventional feeding in children undergoing daycare surgery under general anaesthesia.

Background and Aims: The time paediatric patients should resume oral intake after surgery is still ill-defined. No specific evidence suggests that the usual practice of postoperative fasting of 4-6 h to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is beneficial. The primary objective of this study was to assess the occurrence of PONV with early oral feeding compared to conventional feeding in children undergoing daycare surgery under general anaesthesia. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted in 300 children undergoing daycare surgery under general anaesthesia. Children were randomised into the early feeding group (Group EF, n = 150) or the conventional feeding group (Group CF, n = 150). Group EF received carbohydrate-containing oral fluids when the child demanded feed in the postoperative period. Group CF received oral fluids 4 h post-anaesthesia. All patients were monitored for occurrence of PONV, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay and parental satisfaction. The incidence of PONV was compared using the Chi-squared test, while other continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding PONV (12% in Group EF vs. 18.7% in Group CF, P = 0.109). The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scores were significantly lower in Group EF at 0 min (P = 0.011), 30 min (P = 0.001) and 1 h (P < 0.001). Patients in Group EF had a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay, that is, 6.31 [standard deviation (SD): 3.52] [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45-12.24] h in EF versus 10.13 (SD: 2.99) (95% CI: 5.12-16.33) h in CF (P < 0.001). Parents of the children in Group EF had significantly better parental satisfaction scores (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Early postoperative feeding in children undergoing lower abdominal, non-gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia does not increase the incidence of PONV.

Comparison of aprepitant versus ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Background and Aims: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication after surgery. Preventing PONV in high-risk patients often requires a multimodal approach combining antiemetic drugs with diverse mechanisms. While aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is recognised as highly effective for PONV prevention, uncertainties remain regarding its effectiveness. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The analysis assessed the effectiveness of aprepitant (A), aprepitant plus ondansetron (AO) and aprepitant plus dexamethasone and ondansetron (ADO) in preventing PONV compared to ondansetron alone (O) or in combination with dexamethasone (DO). Results: In the analysis of 12 studies involving 2729 patients, aprepitant demonstrated significant efficacy in preventing PONV compared to ondansetron alone (A versus [vs.] O: PONV incidence 12.5% vs. 28.5%, relative risk [RR] = 0.45, P < 0.001; complete response rate 55.97% vs. 50.35%, RR = 1.13, P = 0.010). The combination of aprepitant with ondansetron (AO) also showed a significantly lower incidence of PONV compared to ondansetron alone (11.3% vs. 26.8%, RR = 0.43, P < 0.001) and a higher complete response rate (38.1% vs. 26.84%, RR = 1.41, P = 0.020). In addition, ADO significantly reduced PONV incidence compared to DO (ADO vs. DO: 13.63% vs. 35.38%, RR = 0.38, P = 0.006). Conclusion: Aprepitant, whether used alone or in combination with ondansetron or both ondansetron and dexamethasone, consistently outperforms ondansetron in achieving a complete response as it lowers vomiting rates and reduces the need for rescue therapy during the crucial 24-48-h postoperative period.

Opioid free versus opioid sparing strategies for multimodal antinociception during laparoscopic colectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), when compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA), reduces postoperative opioid consumption while still providing adequate pain control. We thus tested the hypothesis that patients having an OFA strategy during laparoscopic colectomy would require less postoperative opioids when compared to an OSA strategy. METHODS: This single-center, prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, randomly allocated consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy to receive either sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine (OFA group) or sevoflurane-sufentanil boluses anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine (OSA group). Both groups received multimodal antinociception with boluses of dexamethasone, lidocaine, and ketamine during anesthesia induction, as well as acetaminophen, ketoprofen, and nefopam before the end of the surgery. OFA patients also received a dose of magnesium sulfate during induction. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 48 h after surgery, expressed in oral morphine equivalents (OME). Secondary exploratory outcomes were pain scores, opioid-related adverse events, and patient quality of life (WHODAS score). RESULTS: Of the 160 randomized patients, 155 were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Median [Q1-Q3] OME consumption at 48 hours after surgery did not differ between groups (9 [0-30] mg for OFAvs. 14 [0-30] mg for OSA; p = 0.861). Key secondary outcomes were not different between groups except a three time higher incidence of bradycardia in the OFA group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy with a multimodal antinociception protocol, OFA, when compared to OSA, did not decrease postoperative opioid consumption. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY AND NUMBER: NCT05031234.

Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting after endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapy procedures and the role of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Both the transoral gastric reduction (TORe) and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) procedures are novel endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT). Our practice has an aggressive approach to prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for EBMT cases, but there is divergence of practice regarding use of prophylactic neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1) antagonists (aprepitant, fosaprepitant). Herein, we determined the incidence of PONV and its potential association with NK-1 antagonist administration following EBMT. METHODS: We identified and reviewed medical records of patients who underwent EBMT between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into those administered or not administered an NK-1 antagonist. We analyzed rates of PONV, which was defined as rescue antiemetics during anesthesia recovery. A propensity score was calculated, and outcomes were assessed using generalized estimating equations with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: We identified 404 patients undergoing EBMT (256 [63%] TORe, 148 [37%] ESG), and of these 253 patients developed PONV, (62.6% [95% CI: 57.9% to 67.3%]). NK-1 antagonists were administered to 119 (29.5%) patients. PONV was experienced by 42 (35%) and 211 (74%) of patients who were or were not administered an NK-1 antagonist, respectively (IPTW OR = 0.18, [95%CI: 0.10 to 0.31], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EBMT has a high incidence of PONV during anesthesia recovery. Administration of a NK-1 antagonist as part of a multiagent PONV prophylaxis regimen dramatically reduces risk for this common adverse event.

Efficacy of nonopioid analgesics and adjuvants in multimodal analgesia for reducing postoperative opioid consumption and complications in obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Managing postoperative pain in patients with obesity is challenging. Although multimodal analgesia has proved effective for pain relief, the specific impacts of different nonopioid i.v. analgesics and adjuvants on these patients are not well-defined. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, paracetamol, ketamine, α-2 adrenergic receptor agonists, lidocaine, magnesium, and oral gabapentinoids in reducing perioperative opioid consumption and, secondarily, in mitigating the occurrence of general and postoperative pulmonary complications (POPCs), nausea, vomiting, PACU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS among surgical patients with obesity. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched. Only English-language RCTs investigating the use of nonopioid analgesics and adjuvants in adult surgical patients with obesity were included. The quality of evidence and certainty were assessed using the RoB 2 tool and GRADE framework, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 37 RCTs involving 3602 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Compared with placebo/no intervention or a comparator, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, lidocaine, magnesium, and gabapentin significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption after surgery. Ketamine/esketamine also significantly reduced POPCs. Ibuprofen, dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine significantly reduced postoperative nausea, whereas dexmedetomidine, either alone or combined with pregabalin, and lidocaine reduced postoperative vomiting. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced PACU LOS, whereas both paracetamol and lidocaine reduced hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous nonopioid analgesics and adjuvants are crucial in multimodal anaesthesia, reducing opioid consumption and enhancing postoperative care in adult surgical patients with obesity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: CRD42023399373 (PROSPERO).

Placebo-controlled efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in supratentorial craniotomies: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing complications following neurosurgical procedures, affecting up to 73 % of patients undergoing craniotomy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the placebo-controlled efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonists to prevent PONV following supratentorial craniotomies. METHODS: We searched Medline, Web of Science, and Embase databases following PRISMA guidelines for RCTs comparing the outcomes of prophylactic use of 5-HT3 antagonists with placebo to prevent PONV following supratentorial craniotomy. We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals with a random-effects model. I2 statistics was used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS: Five RCTs, comprising 347 patients, of which 145 received a placebo, were included. The analysis identified a lower likelihood of early postoperative vomiting in 5-HT3 antagonists group (OR=0.47; 95 % CI: 0.24-0.91, p<0.05; I2=7 %), a lower likelihood of vomit within the 24-h period in 5-HT3 antagonists group (OR=0.27; 95 % CI: 0.15-0.48, p<0.01; I2=40 %), a lower likelihood of nausea within the 24-h period in 5-HT3 antagonists group (OR=0.47; 95 % CI: 0.28-0.72, p<0.01; I2=34 %), and a lower likelihood of rescue interventions in 5-HT3 antagonists group (OR = 0.18; 95 % CI: 0.10-0.34; I2 = 0 %. Subgroup analyses focusing on ondansetron also identified a lower likelihood of nausea and vomiting within the 24-h period in the 5-HT3 antagonist group. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified that 5-HT3 antagonists are effective in preventing PONV in the postoperative period following supratentorial craniotomy when compared to placebo. Our findings provide synthesized and robust evidence derived from randomized studies to support the use of 5-HT3 antagonists in clinical practice.

[Update of guidelines of the AFSOS, SFRO, SFH, SFNCM, SFCE, GFRP for the management of radio-induced nausea and vomiting]. / Actualisation du référentiel AFSOS, SFRO, SFH, SFNCM, SFCE, GFRP : nausées et vomissements radio-induits.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting have mutiple clinical consequences: delay or refusal of irradiation (decreased antineoplastic efficacy of irradiation), altered quality of life, dehydration, malnutrition, interruption of treatment, decompensation of comorbidities and aspiration. These guidelines aim at defining good clinical practices for management of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV). METHODS: AFSOS, SFRO, SFH, SFNEP, SFCE and GFRP applied an expert consensus methodology to propose updated guidelines. RESULTS: RINV are underdiagnosed and undertreated. Assessment of the emetogenic risk depends on two main factors: 1) the irradiated anatomical localization and 2) the associated concomitant chemotherapy. In case of exclusive radiotherapy, primary antiemetic prophylaxis depends on the emetogenic risk of irradiated anatomical localization. Primary antiemetic prophylaxis is initiated at the onset of irradiation and continues until 24h after the end of the irradiation. In the case of concomitant radiochemotherapy, the emetogenic risk is generally higher for chemotherapy and the primary antiemetic prophylaxis corresponds to that of chemo-induced nausea and vomiting. In the case of persistence of these symptoms, subject to a well-conducted treatment, a rigorous diagnostic procedure must be carried out before being attributed to radiotherapy and precise evaluation of their impact. Remedial treatments are less well codified. CONCLUSION: It is essential to know and good management practices for radiation-induced nausea and vomiting.

Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study of community pharmacists in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the content and frequency of advice community pharmacists (CPs) provide to pregnant women with nausea and vomiting, their confidence in providing advice, and their knowledge of the safety of medication used to manage the condition. METHODS: An online questionnaire of closed- and open-ended questions was distributed to CPs in the UK in May 2023. Closed-ended questions were analysed quantitatively, and conventional content analysis was utilised for open-ended responses. KEY FINDINGS: One hundred and eighty-one respondents completed the questionnaire, 24 responses were excluded, leaving data from 157 available for analysis. The majority (90.4%) of participants reported having experience in providing advice on nausea and vomiting with varying levels of confidence. Advice provided included using over-the-counter products, lifestyle modifications, reassurance, medication advice, and referring to other healthcare professionals. Knowledge of first-line antiemetics considered safe in pregnancy varied; cyclizine was correctly identified as safe during pregnancy by 57.3%, followed by 37.6% for promethazine and 31.2% for prochlorperazine. Self-reported confidence and having experience providing advice were related to higher medication safety identification rates. Five percent of participants reported previous training on the condition, while 70% reported wanting further education, preferably delivered via an online medium. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that although 90% of CPs provide advice on nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, their medication safety knowledge varied. The majority of CPs reported wanting further education that would ensure women could access reliable information and evidence-based advice to optimise management of the condition.

Running-based food aversion learning in freely-fed and hydrated rats: Daily monitoring of running-induced nausea by measuring kaolin clay ingestion: Running-based food aversion learning in non-deprived rats.

The main objective of this research was to demonstrate food aversion learning in rats with unrestricted access to food and water using a running-based conditioned taste avoidance paradigm. Experiment 1 showed that the target-running paired training group consumed a statistically smaller amount of the target food (tteok rice cakes) compared to the target/running unpaired control group, but the decrease in consumption over days was not fully supported by a statistical test. Experiment 2a improved the methodology by familiarizing rats with tteok before training, which resulted in both a statistically significant group effect and a statistically significant daily decrease in tteok consumption. Experiment 2b demonstrated that tteok aversion could be reacquired after an extinction phase. These experiments indicate that running-based tteok aversion in non-deprived rats is a valid example of Pavlovian conditioning and suggest that wheel running can cause similar effects in unrestricted rats as observed in food- or water-restricted rats. Additionally, daily measurements of kaolin clay ingestion suggested that wheel running induced nausea in the rats of these experiments.

Comparison of Hemodynamic and Recovery Profile Between Segmental Thoracic Spinal and General Anesthesia in Upper Abdominal and Breast Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) has been described primarily as case reports for performing upper abdominal and thoracic surgeries in significant respiratory comorbid patients. A few comparative studies have recently evaluated the technique as an advantageous alternative to general anesthesia (GA). However, there is no systematic evaluation and comparison of the techniques. The present systematic review evaluated the hemodynamic, comfort, and satisfaction of patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic surgeries under STSA and GA. PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar Advanced, and citation tracking were performed to find suitable articles that compared STSA and GA. The primary objective-related data were hypotension and bradycardia. The secondary objective-related data in the context of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV), pain, rescue analgesics, sedation requirement, satisfaction, and comfort were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed for dichotomous data on hypotension, bradycardia, and PONV; odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Data of 394 patients from six studies were evaluated. Patients undergoing upper abdominal and breast surgeries under STSA had significantly higher odds of hypotension (Fixed-Effect Model OR 12.23, 95% CI 2.81-53.28; I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 12.01, 95% CI 2.75-52.52; I2 =0%) and bradycardia (Fixed-Effect Model OR 10.95, 95% CI 2.94-40.74, I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 9.97, 95% CI 2.61-38.08; I2 =0%) but lower odds of PONV (Fixed-Effect Model OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.43; I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.45; I2 =0%). Most of the patients undergoing STSA were given intravenous sedation to overcome anxiety and discomfort. Overall, patient satisfaction was on par with GA. However, few surgeons were unenthusiastic about the technique while performing axillary clearances due to bothering twitches from cautery. STSA led to early post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge and provided better pain control, lowering the need for rescue analgesics and opioid consumption in the first 24-hour postoperative period. STSA is associated with very high odds of hypotension and bradycardia as compared to GA. On the other hand, STSA demonstrated superior pain control, reduced opioid requirements, shorter PACU stays, and significantly reduced risk of PONV. Nevertheless, STSA patients mostly require sedation to make the patient comfortable.

High-Dose Compound Betamethasone Used in Local Infiltration Analgesia Does Not Increase Reinfection Rates Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The administration of cocktails that contain glucocorticoids for local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is highly advocated and has been shown to be effective in managing pain in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, it remains ambiguous whether this protocol maintains its safety and efficacy in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), a devastating complication of TJA. METHODS: A comprehensive retrospective study was carried out on 299 single-stage revision cases for PJI spanning the years 2010 to 2021. Of these, 127 received LIAs containing high-dose compound betamethasone (CB) were termed the CB group, and the other 172 were termed the non-CB group. The rates of reinfection and other postoperative complications, along with postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and opioid consumption were compared. RESULTS: During minimum 2-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the reinfection rate between the non-CB and CB groups (9.3 versus 8.7%; P = 0.85), consistent within the subsets of hip (8.4 versus 4.5%; P = 0.51) and knee (10.4 versus 13.3%; P = 0.60) PJIs individually. The administration of high-dose CB was neither an independent risk factor for reinfection (P > 0.05; 95% CI [confidence interval] including 1) nor was it associated with the occurrence of reinfection (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower in the CB group (P < 0.05). In the initial 48-hour postoperative period, the CB group exhibited lower mean scores in both resting and movement VAS evaluations (P < 0.05). Notably, the movement VAS scores of the CB group remained lower even at 72 hours post-surgery for knee PJIs (P < 0.001). Furthermore, within the first 72 hours post-surgery, the necessity for additional opioid analgesics in the CB group was significantly reduced compared to the non-CB group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A LIA with a high-dose compound betamethasone reduces postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and the incidence of PONV following a single-stage revision without affecting reinfection and other complication rates.

Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) is crucial for maternal safety during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. While midazolam is known to prevent IONV, we hypothesized that remimazolam would be superior due to its minimal hemodynamic effects. We compared the effects of the two drugs on IONV. Methods: Parturients scheduled for cesarean section were randomly assigned to receive either midazolam or remimazolam. They received midazolam 2 mg or remimazolam 5 mg, with additional doses administered upon request. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of newly developed IONV during sedation. Other outcomes included overall IONV, rescue antiemetic use, shivering, hemodynamic variables, sedation scale scores, and satisfaction scores. Results: Data from 80 participants were analyzed. Deeper sedation was induced in the remimazolam group (PGroup × Time < 0.001) despite comparable hemodynamic trends between the groups. The incidence of overall IONV was comparable between the two groups (27.5% in the midazolam group vs. 17.5% in the remimazolam group, absolute risk reduction [ARR]: 0.100, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.082, 0.282], P = 0.284); however, newly developed IONV during sedation was significantly reduced in the remimazolam group (20.0% vs. 5.0%, ARR: 0.150, 95% CI [0.009, 0.291], P = 0.043). The need for rescue antiemetics was also lower in the remimazolam group (15.0% vs. 2.5%, ARR: 0.125, 95% CI [0.004, 0.246], P = 0.048). Conclusion: Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence and severity of newly developed IONV compared with midazolam, with minimal impact on hemodynamics, making it a useful sedative option for cesarean section.

Chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome and impact on quality of life.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome is a disorder of gut-brain interaction that affects the productive-age population. Our aim was to determine the association of this disorder with quality of life, workplace performance, and socioeconomic impact related to gastrointestinal health. METHODS: A cross-sectional study on a Mexican population was conducted. The patients were classified as having chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome or other disorders of gut-brain interaction. A comparative analysis of quality of life, workplace productivity, annual medical consultations, and digestive health-related expenses was carried out, applying a logistic regression model. RESULTS: One thousand patients were included, 79.2% of whom met the criteria for a disorder of gut-brain interaction. Of the 792 patients, 10.3% presented with chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome. Said syndrome was associated with a negative impact on usual activities (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.90-9.30, p ≤ 0.001), pain/discomfort (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.31-3.33, p ≤ 0.001), anxiety/depression (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.30-3.40, p ≤ 0.001), workplace presenteeism (OR 3.96, 95% CI 2.47-6.44, p ≤ 0.001), and workplace absenteeism (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.52-4.16, p ≤ 0.001). There was also a higher number of annual medical consultations for digestive health (p = 0.013), without generating a greater annual expense due to digestive health (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome produces a negative impact on quality of life, which could be secondary to its symptomatology or its association with anxiety and depression.

Dexamethasone versus 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in preventing nausea during awake craniotomy: a propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting during awake craniotomy (AC) can increase cerebral pressure and cause asphyxia and aspiration. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, such as granisetron, are often administered before awakening to prevent nausea during AC. Recently, dexamethasone was reported to prevent nausea and vomiting during AC; however, the efficacy of both drugs in preventing nausea has not yet been investigated. METHODS: We examined the frequency of nausea and vomiting in AC patients (n = 170) treated at our hospital until the end of September 2019. We divided patients as those who received dexamethasone (n = 71) and or granisetron (n = 99) before awakening and examined the frequency of nausea and vomiting after propensity score (PS) matching. RESULT: Eighty-two patients were selected after PS matching. The incidence of nausea was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group than in the granisetron group (9.8% vs 41.5%, p = 0.002). In the logistic regression analysis after matching, the incidence of nausea significantly reduced with dexamethasone treatment (odds ratio: 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.029-0.499, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, dexamethasone was more effective than granisetron in preventing nausea during AC.

Research trends on chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: a bibliometric analysis.

Background: CINV is a frequent adverse response to cancer treatment. There is still much to learn about the pathophysiology and initiating event of CINV, which necessitates continued research despite decades of effort. Identifying the current foci of the complex disease and assessing the scientific impact of pertinent study are made more difficult by the abundance of publications on CINV. Therefore, our goals in this article are to evaluate developments in this field, examine patterns in research domains, and gauge the expansion of CINV research production globally. Methods: Articles about CINV published between 2012 and 2022 were found by searching the Web of Science Core Collection of Clarivate Analytics. The number of publications over time was visualized using Microsoft Office Excel 2019. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were utilized to create knowledge maps that analyzed collaborations between nations, organizations, and writers. They also presented the history of CINV research and highlighted its current areas of focus. Results: In this study, 846 papers in all were assessed. Most publications (237, 28.01%) came from the United States. University of Toronto was the most productive institution (34, 4.01%). With 25 articles published, or 2.96% of the total, Aapro Matti published the most. The most frequently published journal was found to be Supportive Care (158, 18.68%). "Palonosetron," "Moderately emetogenic chemotherapy," "5-HT3 receptor antagonist," and "Neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists" were considered the hot topics. It can be seen that the research focus is on the drug treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Conclusion: Through bibliometric analysis, we were able to gain profound insights into CINV research for the first time. Researchers looking to uncover research frontiers and comprehend important information in this discipline may find the study's findings useful.

Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone sparing for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with highly emetogenic risk antineoplastic agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are common side effects, classified according to timing and severity. Conventional agents such as dexamethasone are effective but have various side effects. For moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapies have been developed to minimize these side effects. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy for highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). METHODS: We performed a thorough literature search for studies related to dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy with neurokinin-1 antagonists (NK1RA) for HEC using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases. A qualitative analysis of the combined data was performed and risk differences with confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Two reviewers independently assessed the 425 records and 12 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility. Two studies were included in the qualitative and meta-analyses. These studies included anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) regimens and cisplatin-based regimens, with palonosetron as the serotonin receptor antagonist. In the two studies, no difference was found in the prevention of vomiting (delayed complete response). However, non-inferiority was not demonstrated in the subgroup that received cisplatin-containing regimens. Delayed complete control showed different results for nausea prevention; however, there was no significant difference in the meta-analysis. Only one report has shown non-inferiority for delayed total control. Although the strength of evidence for individual outcomes varied, there was no difference in the duration of dexamethasone administration. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy with NK1RA and palonosetron can be used to prevent CINV in HEC, limited to AC combination therapy.

Postoperative Complications.

Surgery under anesthesia poses a significant stress to the body, and postoperative complications occur in up to 20% of cases. An understanding of postoperative complications, including assessment of patients at risk, risk mitigation, early recognition, and evidence-based treatment, is essential to provide high-value health care. Common postoperative complications reviewed in this article include fever, cerebrovascular accident, nausea and vomiting, ileus, and urinary retention, including discussion of pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of olanzapine-based prophylactic antiemetic therapy for delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting in patients with HER2-positive or HER2-low breast cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan: ERICA study (WJOG14320B).

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting are common adverse events associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). We evaluated the efficacy of an olanzapine-based triplet regimen for preventing nausea and vomiting in patients receiving their first cycle T-DXd. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (ERICA) phase II study enrolled patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low metastatic breast cancer receiving their first cycle of T-DXd. Patients were randomized to olanzapine 5 mg or placebo once daily (1 : 1 ratio) from day 1 to day 6, plus a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone 6.6 mg intravenously or 8 mg orally on day 1. The total observation period was 504 h (21 days) from the first T-DXd administration. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emetic events and no rescue medications, in the delayed phase (24-120 h after T-DXd), with the type I error rate of 0.2 (one-sided) for the comparison. Secondary endpoints included no nausea rate in the delayed and persistent phases (120-504 h), adverse event by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE). RESULTS: In total, 168 patients were enrolled at 43 sites in Japan (November 2021-September 2023) with 162 patients (olanzapine, n = 80; placebo, n = 82) included in the per protocol set. The primary endpoint was met as the delayed phase CR rate was significantly greater with olanzapine than placebo (70.0% versus 56.1%, P = 0.047). Efficacy was maintained in the persistent phase (63.9% versus 44.4%). No nausea rate was also greater with olanzapine (delayed phase: 57.5% versus 37.8%; persistent phase: 51.4% versus 31.9%). CR rates in the delayed phase favored olanzapine across subgroups. Appetite loss was also decreased with olanzapine. Hyperglycemia and somnolence were mostly of low-grade severity. CONCLUSION: Olanzapine 5 mg for 6 days with 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone appears effective for T-DXd-treated patients to prevent delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting.