Clinical Care Pathway and Management of Major Bleeding Associated with Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants: A Modified Delphi Consensus from Saudi Arabia and UAE.

Background: The nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have become the mainstay anticoagulation therapy for patients requiring oral anticoagulants (OACs) in the Gulf Council Cooperation (GCC) countries. The frequency of NOAC-associated major bleeding is expected to increase in the Emergency Department (ED). Nonetheless, we still lack local guidelines and recommendations for bleeding management in the region. The present Delphi-based consensus aims to establish a standardized and evidence-based clinical care pathway for managing NOAC-associated major bleeding in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods: We adopted a three-step modified Delphi method to develop evidence-based recommendations through two voting rounds and an advisory meeting between the two rounds. A panel of 11 experts from the KSA and UAE participated in the consensus development. Results: Twenty-eight statements reached the consensus level. These statements addressed key aspects of managing major bleeding events associated with NOACs, including the increased use of NOAC in clinical practice, clinical care pathways, and treatment options. Conclusion: The present Delphi consensus provides evidence-based recommendations and protocols for the management of NOAC-associated bleeding in the region. Patients with major DOAC-induced bleeding should be referred to a well-equipped ED with standardized management protocols. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for establishing the association between NOAC use and major bleeding. Treating physicians should have prompt access to specific reversal agents to optimize patient outcomes. Real-world evidence and national guidelines are needed to aid all stakeholders involved in NOAC-induced bleeding management.

The safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently observed cardiac arrhythmia in clinical settings. Obesity can influence the efficacy of the treatment administered, which requires a larger dose and more time to accomplish therapeutic targets due to altered pathophysiology. Our study aimed to assess the overall efficacy and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in AF patients with morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2 and/or weight > 120 kg) to prevent complications. METHODS: We conducted a literature search on PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus till October 2022 for articles addressing the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin for the treatment of AF in morbidly obese patients. We performed the meta-analysis with RevMan software version 5.4 and Open Meta Analyst. The main outcomes assessed were stroke, major bleeding, and minor bleeding after anticoagulation, as did the history of comorbidities and risk factors in morbidly obese patients. Quality assessment was performed using Cochrane's ROB-2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Regarding major bleeding events, pooled data showed that patients taking NOACs had a significantly lower risk than patients taking warfarin (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: [0.41-0.70]; p < 0.00001). However, for minor bleeding, there was a nonsignificant effect of NOACs on reducing the risk of bleeding (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.47-1.09; p = 0.12), which became highly significant in favor of NOACs after sensitivity analysis (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.49-0.61]; p < 0.00001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of stroke between the NOAC group and the warfarin group (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.60-0.80]; p < 0.00001). According to the results of the single-arm study analysis, the overall effect of all the outcomes was associated with a high risk of disease development in patients receiving NOACs. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis showed a favorable effect of NOACs vs warfarin in morbidly obese patients. Some outcomes were not significantly different, which calls for future research to better assess their safety and efficacy in this particular weight group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with PROSPERO under registration number CRD42022362493 on October 2022.

Simultaneous acute portal vein thrombosis and ST elevation myocardial infarction in a Covid-19 patient - Case report.

Background: Covid-19 infected patients without any risk factors and family history of a thrombotic event can be still at risks of developing thrombotic and/or other Covid-19-related complications, and therefore, there is a substantial need to study such cases. Case presentation: In this study, we present a 60-years-old Covid-19 patient with mild symptoms who was admitted to the hospital with simultaneous arterial and venous thrombotic event, with chief complaint of chest pain and vague abdominal pain. The patient was diagnosed with Covid-19 two weeks before admission to the ICU. A 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed pathologic Q-wave ST-segment elevation and T-wave inversion in II, III, aVF, and T inversion in V5 and V6. Quantitative troponin was elevated which confirmed inferior ST-elevation MI. Abdominal color Doppler sonography and CT scan with contrast demonstrated an absent flow in the portal vein and thrombosis. A chest CT scan illustrated a normal pattern. We started IV unfractionated heparin (UFH), dual antiplatelet, beta-blocker, statin, intravenous nitrate, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Coronary angiography showed the right coronary artery was totally cut off at the proximal part.Here we report three main un-common characteristics associated with our patient compared to other similar studies. First, the thrombotic event in our case occurred without pulmonary involvement and the patient only had a flu-like symptom two weeks before admission. The second main difference is that the patient's arterial and venous thrombotic events had simultaneously happened, which is not common in most cases. Patient presented simultaneous portal vein thrombosis and recent ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction (MI). Finally, both MI and portal vein thrombosis symptoms were subtle and confusing, which could cause misdiagnosis. A post two-weeks color Doppler sonography follow-up showed portal vein thrombosis recanalization and myocardial perfusion scan had no viability and reversible ischemia in RCA territory. Conclusions: This report addresses that a cautious diagnosis of Covid-19 at the time of admission can play a vital role in preventing cardiovascular events; where even asymptomatic to mildly infected patients could be still at higher risks of developing clinical complications (e.g., thrombotic events).

Off-label underdosing of four individual NOACs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Although several meta-analyses have examined the effects of off-label underdosing of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with their recommended doses in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), they combined different kinds of NOACs in their primary analyses. Herein, we first conducted a meta-analysis to separately assess the effects of off-label underdosing versus on-label dosing of four individual NOACs on adverse outcomes in the AF population. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase database were systemically searched until November 2021 to identify the relevant studies. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by utilizing a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of nine studies with 144,797 patients taking NOACs were included in the meta-analysis. In the pooled analysis, off-label underdosing of rivaroxaban was related to an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.63; p = .02), whereas off-label underdosing of apixaban was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40; p = .01). When comparing off-label underdosing versus on-label dosing of dabigatran or edoxaban, no differences were found in the primary and secondary clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Off-label underdosing of rivaroxaban may increase the risk of stroke or systematic embolism, whereas off-label underdosing of apixaban may heighten the incidence of all-cause death.

Comparison of Dabigatran Plus a P2Y12 Inhibitor With Warfarin-Based Triple Therapy Across Body Mass Index in RE-DUAL PCI.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) affects drug levels of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. We sought to assess whether BMI affected outcomes in the RE-DUAL PCI trial. METHODS: RE-DUAL PCI (NCT02164864) evaluated the safety and efficacy of a dual-antithrombotic-therapy regimen using dabigatran (110 mg or 150 mg twice daily and a P2Y12 platelet antagonist) in comparison with triple therapy of warfarin, aspirin, and a P2Y12 platelet inhibitor in 2725 patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compared the risk of first International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)-defined major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (primary endpoint) and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or unplanned revascularization (main efficacy endpoint) in relation to baseline BMI. RESULTS: Median (range) BMI was 28.1 (14-66) kg/m2. Dabigatran dual therapy versus warfarin triple therapy had relevantly and similarly lower rates of bleeding at both 110 mg and 150 mg twice-daily doses, irrespective of BMI. Thromboembolic event rates appeared consistent across categories of BMI, including those <25 and ≥35 kg/m2 (P for interaction: 0.806 and 0.279, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in bleeding with dabigatran dual therapy compared with warfarin triple therapy in patients here evaluated appears consistent across BMI categories.

Changing Treatment Patterns in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: In Asia, little information is available about contemporary real-world treatment patterns for venous thromboembolism (VTE).Methods and Results:Consecutive patients (n=11,414) from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database with initial VTE and taking oral anticoagulants between May 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016 were included. The temporal trends of using oral anticoagulants and pharmacomechanical therapy during the study period were evaluated. The efficacy and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. warfarin were compared. Propensity score analysis (NOACs n=3,647 vs. warfarin n=3,647) was used to balance covariates between groups, and Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment were used to estimate the risks of clinical outcomes. The use of NOACs increased from 0.3% to 60.2% for VTE treatment during the study period. Pharmacomechanical therapy was used in 9.60%, 8.22%, and 5.63% from 2014 through 2016. NOACs were associated with a 16% risk reduction (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.93) in all-cause mortality and a 21% risk reduction (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96) in recurrent VTE vs. warfarin. Overall, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin (aHR 0.804, 95% CI 0.648-0.998). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice, NOACs have become the major anticoagulant used for Asians with VTE. Although NOACs had a lower risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding compared with warfarin in Taiwan, we still need a large-scale randomized controlled trial to confirm the findings.

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Stages 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether oral anticoagulants can provide efficacy and safety profiles better than no anticoagulant in patients with stages 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation. METHODS: From 2001 to 2017, a cohort of patients with stages 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation based on electronic medical records were selected from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital system in Taiwan. Patients were divided into nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), warfarin, and nonanticoagulated groups. They were followed from the index date to the occurrence of the study outcomes or for 5 years, whichever occurred first. The outcomes were admissions due to ischemic stroke or systemic embolism or major bleedings. Survival analyses were conducted to estimate the incidence rates of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3771 patients with atrial fibrillation and estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 were enrolled, of whom 2971 were in the nonanticoagulated group, 280 in the NOAC group, and 520 in the warfarin group. About 25% of all subjects (940 patients) were on dialysis. The mean follow-up was 3.2 years. After adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, and comedication, the warfarin group had a significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-4.6) than the nonanticoagulated group. The NOAC group had a similar risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (aHR 1.1; 95% CI 0.3-3.4) to that of the nonanticoagulated group. Both the warfarin and the NOAC groups had a significantly higher major bleeding risk than the noncoagulated group (aHR 2.8 [95% CI 2.0-3.8] for warfarin; aHR 3.1 [95% CI 1.9-5.2] for NOAC). CONCLUSION: The use of NOACs or warfarin is not more effective than using no anticoagulants at all in reducing the risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. Both NOACs and warfarin are associated with increased risk of major bleeding. Our results do not support the use of anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and stages 4-5 chronic kidney disease.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Low Body Weight.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the overall effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are consistent in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and extremely low body weight (<50 kg). OBJECTIVES: This study compared DOACs with warfarin in AF patients with low body weight. METHODS: Using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from January 2014 to December 2016, AF patients with body weight ≤60 kg and who were treated with oral anticoagulants (n = 14,013 taking DOACs and n = 7,576 taking warfarin) were included and examined for ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, all-cause death, and composite outcome. The propensity score weighting was used to balance the 2 groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups (mean age 73 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 4, and 28% of patients weighed <50 kg). DOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.591; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.510 to 0.686) and major bleeding (HR: 0.705; 95%: CI 0.601 to 0.825), which were caused by a reduction in ICH (HR: 0.554; 95% CI: 0.429 to 0.713) compared with warfarin. DOAC improved the net clinical benefit compared with warfarin (HR for composite outcome: 0.660; 95% CI: 0.606 to 0.717), and this was consistent in patients who weighed <50 kg (HR for composite outcome: 0.665; 95% CI: 0.581 to 0.762). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world Asian AF population with low body weight, DOACs showed better effectiveness and safety than warfarin. These results were consistent in patients with extremely low body weight. Regular dosages of DOACs showed comparable results as reduced dosages of DOACs in both effectiveness and safety.

"As Needed" nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for infrequent atrial fibrillation episodes following atrial fibrillation ablation guided by diligent pulse monitoring: A feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: After atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended if stroke risk as assessed by CHA2 DS 2 -VASc score is high. However, patients without AF are often reluctant to take daily OAC. We describe outcome using as needed nonvitamin K antagonist (NOACs) guided by pulse monitoring to detect AF following successful ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 99 patients (84% male, age 64 ± 8 years), CHA2 DS 2 -VASc score greater than or equal to 1 in men and greater than or equal to 2 in women (median 2, range 1-6), capable of pulse assessment twice daily and no AF on extended monitoring after AF ablation. All patients were instructed to start NOAC if AF >1 hour or recurrent shorter episodes. Duration of NOAC use after restart was typically 2 to 4 weeks. After 30 ± 14 months (total 244 patient-years), 22 patients (22%) transitioned to daily NOAC because of noncompliance with pulse assessment or patient preference (six patients) or because of suspected or documented AF episode(s) in 16 (16%) patients. Of the remaining 77 (78%), 14 (14%) used NOACs but did not transition back to daily use, most (10 patients) with single use (seven patients) or non-AF rhythm (three patients) documented. There was only one thromboembolic event (0.4%/yr of follow-up) in patient without AF and one mild bleeding event (epistaxis). CONCLUSION: The use of as needed NOACs when AF is suspected with pulse monitoring is effective and safe to maintain low risk of stroke and bleeding after successful ablation. Transition back to daily NOAC use should be anticipated in about one quarter of patients.

Rapid Reversal of Novel Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Medications in General Surgery Emergencies.

The reversal of the new class of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is challenging in the emergent perioperative setting. This summary focuses on the reversal of NOACs, determining the emergent nature (risk analysis), and other considerations in reversal.

Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Severe Renal Dysfunction.

Both atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are highly prevalent, especially with increasing age and associated comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, and vascular disease. The relationship between both AF and CKD seems to be bidirectional: CKD predisposes to AF while onset of AF seems to lead to progression of CKD. Stroke prevention is the cornerstone of AF management, and AF patients with CKD are at higher risk of stroke, mortality, cardiac events, and bleeding. Stroke prevention requires use of oral anticoagulants, which are either vitamin K antagonists (eg, warfarin), or the nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). While NOACs have been shown to be effective in mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction, there are a paucity of data regarding NOACs in severe and end-stage renal dysfunction. This review first discusses the evidence for NOACs in CKD. Second, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the efficacy and safety of NOACs to prevent AF-related stroke and systemic embolism in severe and end-stage renal disease.

Safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a transitory increase in the risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding events. Evidence on the use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients undergoing AF ablation mostly comes from small observational studies, underpowered to detect differences in clinical outcomes between NOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) treated patients. This updated meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of periprocedural anticoagulation with NOACs compared with VKAs in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and web sources for randomized and observational studies comparing periprocedural treatment with NOACs and VKAs in patients undergoing AF ablation. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding events, and the primary efficacy endpoint was thromboembolic events (a composite of systemic thromboembolism, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). RESULTS: A total of 29 studies with 12 644 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, patients on NOACs had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to VKAs either in observational studies (Peto OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.48-0.95; P = 0.022; I2  = 20%) or in RCTs (Peto OR 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14-0.62; P = 0.001; I2  = 28%). Uninterrupted NOACs reduced the risk of major bleeding when compared to uninterrupted VKAs (Peto OR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45-0.96; P = 0.028; I2  = 1%), similarly, interrupted NOACs lowered the risk of major bleeding compared to interrupted VKAs (Peto OR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.13-0.66; P = 0.003; I2  = 0%; Pinteraction  = 0.076). The rate of thromboembolic complications was very low and did not significantly differ between the study groups either in observational studies (Peto OR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.49-1.67; P = 0.755; I2  = 0%) or in RCTs (Peto OR 0.14; 95% CI: 0.01-1.30; P = 0.083; I2  = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Use of NOACs compared to VKAs significantly reduced the risk of bleeding in patients with AF ablation. Similarly, the risk of bleeding was lower with uninterrupted NOACs than with uninterrupted VKAs, and with interrupted NOACs than with interrupted VKAs. The rate of thromboembolic complications was extremely low in both study groups without any differences.

Contemporary utilization of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: an audit in an Australian hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: To document antithrombotic utilization in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), particularly, recently approved NOACs (nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants) and warfarin; and identify factors predicting the use of NOACs versus warfarin. METHODS: A retrospective audit was conducted in an Australian hospital. Data pertaining to inpatients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) admitted between January and December 2014 were extracted. This included patient demographics, risk factors (stroke, bleeding), social history, medical conditions, medication history, medication safety issues, medication adherence, and antithrombotic prescribed at admission and discharge. RESULTS: Among 199 patients reviewed, 84.0% were discharged on antithrombotics. Anticoagulants (± antiplatelets) were most frequently (52.0%) prescribed (two-thirds were prescribed warfarin, the remainder NOACs), followed by antiplatelets (33.0%). Among 41 patients receiving NOACs, 59.0% were prescribed rivaroxaban, 24.0% dabigatran, and 17.0% apixaban. Among patients aged 75 years and over, antiplatelets were most frequently used (37.0%), followed by warfarin (33.0%), then NOACs (14.0%). Compared with their younger counterparts, patients aged 75 years and over were significantly less likely to receive NOACs (14.0% versus 28.0%, p = 0.01). Among the 'most eligible' patients (Congestive Cardiac Failure, Hypertension (, Age ⩾ 75 years, Age= 65-74 years, Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack/ Thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Sex female[CHA2DS2-VASc] score ⩾2 and no bleeding risk factors), 46.0% were not anticoagulated on discharge. Patients with anaemia (68.0% versus 86.0%, p = 0.04) or a history of bleeding (65.0% versus 87.0%, p = 0.01) were less likely to receive antithrombotics compared with those without these risk factors. Warfarin therapy was less frequently prescribed among patients with cognitive impairment compared with patients with no cognitive issues (12.0% versus 23.0%, p = 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression modelling identified that patients with renal impairment were 3.6 times more likely to receive warfarin compared with NOACs (odds ratio = 3.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.90, p = 0.03, 60.0% correctly predicted; Cox and Snell R2 = 0.51, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of NOACs, warfarin remains a preferred treatment option, particularly among patients with renal impairment. The high proportion of eligible patients still being prescribed antiplatelet therapy or 'no therapy' needs to be addressed.

Appropriate dosing of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

The development of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been a major advance in therapy for patients requiring oral anticoagulation, particularly for long-term indications such as stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). The NOACs are generally easier to dose and manage due to less heterogeneity of effect across individuals and fewer drug and food interactions, compared with warfarin. However, the treatment effect of NOACs may vary based on important patient characteristics, particularly renal function. Therefore, the package inserts for these drugs have dosing recommendations for patients with impaired kidney function, which are frequently but not always based on evidence from large-scale, randomized, clinical trials. Furthermore, there is evidence that NOAC dosing inconsistent with the regulatory labeling may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. This review discusses the evidence supporting the current NOAC dosing, current dosing practices, associated outcomes, and gaps in knowledge regarding use of NOACs in patients with AF.

Idarucizumab for dabigatran overdose.

CONTEXT: An overdose of oral anticoagulants represents a challenging scenario for emergency physicians. Dabigatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is increasingly used in place of warfarin. The lack of an antidote is a concern in patients who overdose on dabigatran, even though the drug can be eliminated with hemodialysis. Idarucizumab is an antibody fragment that binds dabigatran with high affinity. It reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran within minutes and is approved for the reversal of dabigatran during emergency situations. CASE DETAILS: We describe the use of idarucizumab in the management of a 68-year-old woman who was taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily and ingested 125 capsules. Despite gastric lavage and administration of activated charcoal within two hours of drug intake, the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) remained prolonged. The administration of 5 g of intravenous idarucizumab promptly and completely reversed the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran as assessed by routine and specific coagulation assays (aPTT from to 75 to 26 s, PT from 26 to 11 s and diluted thrombin time from 92 to 27 s). The initially planned emergency hemodialysis was canceled. DISCUSSION: This case highlights the potential use of idarucizumab for the management of massive dabigatran overdoses.

The Role of Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Anticoagulation is important in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Until recently, heparins and vitamin K antagonists were the only available therapy for stroke reduction in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) are now available and offer new options for stroke prevention. This article reviews the available data on the use of NOACs for primary and secondary stroke prevention in AF patients and describes specific patient populations to guide clinician in making the informed decision regarding appropriate use of those agents. It also addresses the use of NOACs early after acute stroke and use of thrombolysis while on NOAC.

Choice of New Oral Anticoagulant Agents Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation: FANTASIIA Study.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Many patients with AF receive chronic anticoagulation, either with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or with non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We sought to analyze variables associated with prescription of NOAC. METHODS: Patients with AF under anticoagulation treatment were prospectively recruited in this observational registry. The sample comprised 1290 patients under chronic anticoagulation for AF, 994 received VKA (77.1%) and 296 NOAC (22.9%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with use of NOAC. RESULTS: Mean age was 73.8 ± 9.4 years, and 42.5% of the patients were women. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0 in 4.9% of the population, 1 in 24.1%, and ≥2 in 71% (median = 4, interquartile range = 2). Variables associated with NOAC treatment were major bleeding (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.73-6.51; P < .001), hemorrhagic stroke (OR = 3.19; CI 95% 1.00-10.15, P = .049), university education (OR = 2.44; CI 95%: 1.55-3.84; P < .001), high diastolic blood pressure (OR = 1.02; CI 95%: 1.00-1.03; P = .006), and higher glomerular filtration rate (OR 1.01, CI 95% 1.00-1.01; P = .01). And variables associated with VKA use were history of cancer (OR = 0.46; CI 95%: 0.25-0.85; P = .013) and bradyarrhythmia (OR = 0.40; CI 95% 0.19-0.85; P = .020). CONCLUSION: Medical and social variables were associated with prescription of NOAC. Major bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, university education, and higher glomerular filtration rate were more frequent among patients under NOAC. On the contrary, patients with history of cancer or bradyarrhythmias more frequently received VKA.

Underuse of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke. Guidelines recommend anticoagulation for patients with intermediate and high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2). Underuse of anticoagulants among eligible patients remains a persistent problem. Evidence demonstrates that the psychology of the fear of causing harm (omission bias) results in physicians' hesitancy to initiate anticoagulation and an inaccurate estimation of stroke risk. The American Heart Association (AHA) initiated the Get With The Guidelines-AFIB (GWTG-AFIB) module in June 2013 to enhance guideline adherence for treatment and management of AF. Better quality of care for AF patients can be provided by increasing adherence to anticoagulation guidelines and improving patient compliance with anticoagulation therapy through education and established protocols. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants may facilitate better patient adherence due to ease of administration and reduced monitoring burden. In this review, we discuss the reasons for underuse, omission bias contributing to underuse, and different strategies to address this issue.