RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), representing 15%-20% of individuals with SLE, has been difficult to study globally due to differences between registries. This initiative, supported by Childhood Arthritis Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS), aims to create Core and Expanded cSLE Datasets to standardise and enhance research worldwide. METHODS: 21 international cSLE experts and 4 patients participated in a Delphi process (questionnaires, 2 topic-specific focus groups and 3 virtual consensus meetings) to create 2 standardised cSLE datasets. The Core cSLE Dataset was designed to include data essential to meaningful clinical research across many settings. The Expanded cSLE Dataset was designed for centres able to consistently collect data to address broader research questions. Final data items for the Core and Expanded datasets were determined by consensus defined as >80% agreement) using an adapted nominal group technique and voting. RESULTS: The resulting Core cSLE Dataset contains 46 items, including demographics, clinical features, laboratory results, medications and significant adverse events. The Expanded cSLE Dataset adds 26 additional items and includes patient-reported outcomes. Consensus was also achieved regarding the frequency and time points for data collection: baseline, quarterly follow-up visits, annually and flare visits. CONCLUSION: Standardised Core and Expanded cSLE Datasets for registry-based international cSLE research were defined through the consensus of global experts and patient/caregiver representatives, endorsed by CARRA and PReS. These datasets incorporate disease-specific and patient-specific features, optimised for diverse settings to facilitate international collaborative research for children and adolescents with SLE worldwide.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Most patients who have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant do not receive life-prolonging therapy from it. Little research has been undertaken to determine which patients benefit the least from ICD therapy. As patients age and accumulate comorbidities, the risk of death increases and the benefit of ICDs diminishes. We sought to evaluate the impact of comorbidity, frailty, functional status on death with no prior appropriate ICD therapy. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, observational study involving 12 English hospitals was undertaken. Patients were eligible for inclusion for the study if they were scheduled to have a de novo, upgrade to or replacement of a transvenous or subcutaneous ICD or cardiac resynchronisation therapy device and defibrillator (CRT-D). Baseline characteristics were collected. Participants were asked to complete a frailty assessment (Fried score) and a functional status questionnaire (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was calculated. Patients were prospectively followed up for 2.5 years. The primary outcome was death with no prior appropriate therapy. RESULTS: In total, 675 patients were enrolled, mean age 65.7 (IQR 65-75) years. A total of 63 patients (9.5%) died during follow-up, 58 without receiving appropriate ICD therapy. Frailty was present in 86/675 (12.7%) and severe comorbidity in 69/675 (10.2%). Multivariate predictors of death with no appropriate therapy were identified and a risk score comprising frailty, comorbidity, increasing age, estimated glomerular filtration rate and EQ-5D-5L was developed. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities, frailty and the EQ-5D-5L score are powerful, independent predictors of death with no prior appropriate therapy in ICD/CRT-D recipients.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Fragilidade , Estado Funcional , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Fragilidade/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Medição de Risco/métodos , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Cardioversão Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Idoso FragilizadoRESUMO
This systematic review provides a structured overview of the measurement instruments of functional outcome used in lower extremity and pelvic bone sarcoma patients. We identified 42 unique instruments covering 18 distinct functional outcome constructs with most studies measuring constructs within the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, disability, and health. The MusculoSkeletal Tumor Society 1993 and 1987 score, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, and range of motion instruments were the measurement instruments most commonly used.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To determine whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) improves clinical outcomes after large ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when administered early in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: STEM-AMI OUTCOME was designed as a prospective, multicentre, nationwide, randomised, open-label, phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01969890) to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of early G-CSF administration in reducing 2-year cardiac mortality and morbidity in patients with STEMI with LV ejection fraction ≤45% after PCI. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, recurrence of myocardial infarction and hospitalisation for heart failure. Due to low recruitment and event rates, the study was discontinued and did not achieve adequate statistical power to verify the hypothesis. RESULTS: Patients were randomly allocated to G-CSF (n=260) or standard of care (SOC; n=261). No difference was found in the composite primary outcome between study groups (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.63 to 2.28). The 2-year mortality was 2.31% in the G-CSF and 2.68% in the control group (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.29 to 2.60). Adverse events did not differ between the G-CSF (n=65) and SOC groups (n=58; OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.75). In post hoc analyses on the intervention group, we observed a trend towards fewer composite primary outcomes in patients with low bone marrow (BM) cell mobilisation (n=108) versus those with high mobilisation (n=152, with peak leucocyte count >50×109/L; HR 2.86; 95% CI 0.96 to 8.56). Primary outcomes were lower in patients with severe LV systolic dysfunction at discharge treated with G-CSF than in controls (interaction ß±SE, -0.08±0.04; p=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Although inconclusive, this is the largest trial in the field of cell-based cardiac repair after STEMI providing evidence of the tolerability and long-term safety of G-CSF treatment. The results prompt further studies to understand which patient can benefit most from BM cell mobilisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01969890.
Assuntos
Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/fisiopatologia , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/terapia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Recidiva , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is characterised by widespread pain and is associated with mood disorders such as depression as well as poor sleep quality. These in turn have been linked to increased risk of suicidal ideation. Clinical guidelines generally do not recommended opioids in FMS, but they are routinely prescribed to a considerable proportion of FMS patients. We assessed the association of long-term opioid prescription for FMS with risk of depression, sleep disorders and suicidal ideation, when compared with short-term opioid use. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study combing several population-wide databases covering a population of five million inhabitants, including all adults who received an initial opioid prescription from 2014 to 2018 specifically prescribed for FMS. We examined the occurrence of depression, sleep disorders or suicidal ideation outcomes in patients with an initial long-term opioid prescription (>90 days) versus those who received a short-term treatment (<29 days). We employed multivariable Cox regression modelling and inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores and we performed several sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: 10 334 patients initiated short-term (8309, 80.40%) or long-term (2025, 19.60%) opioids for FMS. In main adjusted analyses, long-term opioid use was associated with an increased risk for depression (HR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.95) and sleep disorder (HR: 1.30, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.55) but not with suicidal ideation (HR: 1.59, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.62). In models assessing outcomes since day 90, an increased risk for suicidal ideation was observed (HR: 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.98). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that continued opioid use for 90 days or more may aggravate depression and sleep problems in patients with FMS when compared with patterns of short-term treatment.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Depressão , Fibromialgia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Ideação Suicida , Humanos , Fibromialgia/epidemiologia , Fibromialgia/psicologia , Fibromialgia/tratamento farmacológico , Fibromialgia/complicações , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Idoso , Fatores de RiscoAssuntos
Hidroxicloroquina , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Trombose , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Trombose/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose/etiologia , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) allows for certain clinical and/or serological activity of SLE, provided overall disease activity does not exceed predefined cut-offs. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who achieved LLDAS with clinical activity, serological activity only or neither clinical nor serological activity. METHODS: Patients with SLE enrolled in a prospective multinational cohort from March 2013 to December 2020 who were in LLDAS at least once were included. Visits that fulfilled both LLDAS and Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria were excluded. RESULTS: 2099 patients were included, with median follow-up of 3.5 (IQR 1.3-5.8) years. At 6150 visits, patients were in LLDAS but not DORIS criteria; of these 1280 (20.8%) had some clinical activity, 3102 (50.4%) visits had serological activity only and 1768 (28.8%) visits had neither clinical nor serological activity. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared with non-LLDAS, all three subsets of LLDAS had a protective association with flares in the ensuing 6 months and damage accrual in the ensuing 36 months. LLDAS with no clinical or serological activity had a significantly stronger protective association with severe flares in the ensuing 6 months compared with LLDAS with clinical activity (HR 0.47, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.82), p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: LLDAS without any clinical activity accounted for almost 80% of LLDAS visits. This study confirms that all subsets of LLDAS are associated with reduced flare and damage accrual. However, LLDAS without any clinical or serological activity has the strongest protective association with severe flares.
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , SeguimentosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Routine screening for cardiovascular disease before kidney transplantation remains controversial. This study aims to compare cardiac testing rates in patients with end-stage renal disease, referred and not referred for transplantation, and assess the impact of testing on transplant wait times. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 22 687 end-stage renal disease patients from 2011 to 2022, within an integrated health system. Cardiac testing patterns, and the association between cardiac testing and transplant wait times and post-transplant mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 22 687 patients (median age 66 years, 41.1% female), 6.9% received kidney transplants, and 21.0% underwent evaluation. Compared with dialysis patients, transplant patients had a 5.6 times higher rate of stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with single-photon emission (rate ratio (RR) 5.64, 95% CI 5.37 to 5.92), a 6.5 times higher rate of stress echocardiogram (RR 6.51, 95% CI 5.65 to 7.51) and 16% higher cardiac catheterisation (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27). In contrast, revascularisation rates were significantly lower in transplant patients (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.58). Transplant wait times were longer for patients who underwent stress testing (median 474 days with no testing vs 1053 days with testing) and revascularisation (1796 days for percutaneous intervention and 2164 days for coronary artery bypass surgery). No significant association was observed with 1-year post-transplant mortality (adjusted OR 1.99, 95% CI 0.46 to 8.56). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a higher rate of cardiac testing in dialysis patients evaluated for kidney transplants. Cardiac testing was associated with longer transplant wait time, but no association was observed between testing and post-transplant mortality.
Assuntos
Teste de Esforço , Falência Renal Crônica , Transplante de Rim , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Listas de Espera/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , SeguimentosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk increases with age. Statins reduce cardiovascular risk but their effects are less certain at older ages. We assessed the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for older people in the contemporary UK population using a recent meta-analysis of randomised evidence of statin effects in older people and a new validated CVD model. METHODS: The performance of the CVD microsimulation model, developed using the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (CTTC) and UK Biobank cohort, was assessed among participants ≥70 years old at (re)surveys in UK Biobank and the Whitehall II studies. The model projected participants' cardiovascular risks, survival, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and healthcare costs (2021 UK£) with and without lifetime standard (35%-45% low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction) or higher intensity (≥45% reduction) statin therapy. CTTC individual participant data and other meta-analyses informed statins' effects on cardiovascular risks, incident diabetes, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Sensitivity of findings to smaller CVD risk reductions and to hypothetical further adverse effects with statins were assessed. RESULTS: In categories of men and women ≥70 years old without (15,019) and with (5,103) prior CVD, lifetime use of a standard statin increased QALYs by 0.24-0.70 and a higher intensity statin by a further 0.04-0.13 QALYs per person. Statin therapies were cost-effective with an incremental cost per QALY gained below £3502/QALY for standard and below £11778/QALY for higher intensity therapy and with high probability of being cost-effective. In sensitivity analyses, statins remained cost-effective although with larger uncertainty in cost-effectiveness among older people without prior CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current evidence for the effects of statin therapy and modelling analysis, statin therapy improved health outcomes cost-effectively for men and women ≥70 years old.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Análise Custo-Benefício , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/economia , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the identification of prognostic factors (PF) capable of predicting disease outcome, response to treatment or success of dose reduction is an important issue, as these factors are intended to serve as a basis for decision-making. The task is complex from the outset, as the definition of disease prognosis or therapeutic prognosis is not uniquevocal. The heterogeneity of the definitions used partly explains the failure to identify PF that can be applied at an individual level. But other factors also contribute. First, the scope of the disease studied is too broad, including nosologically different entities. Second, potential PF are only measured at a single point of time, whereas changes over a period of time should be taken into account to a greater extent, not forgetting the potential impact of the treatment received during this period. Beyond these limiting factors, one of the main obstacles to the identification of PF is probably the fact that the phase of the disease is not sufficiently taken into account. Predicting the disease outcome when it is well established is a more complex challenge than when it is just beginning, as many factors are likely to interfere. The same applies to therapeutic PF, which should be determined according to disease duration. Difficulties also arise from the approaches used, which are often restricted to a single field of interest whereas they should be much more integrative and call on new large-scale data analysis tools with a view to precision medicine.In RA, prognosis can be defined at two levels: disease outcome, including joint damage and risk of extra-articular manifestations and/or complications, and treatment outcome, including response to therapy, risk of adverse effects and drug-free remission.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Humanos , Prognóstico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Gerenciamento ClínicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute aortic dissection (AD) in pregnancy poses a lethal risk to both mother and fetus. However, well-established therapeutic guidelines are lacking. This study aimed to investigate clinical features, outcomes and optimal management strategies for pregnancy-related AD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study including 67 women with acute AD during pregnancy or within 12 weeks postpartum from three major cardiovascular centres in China between 2003 and 2021. Patient characteristics, management strategies and short-term outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Median age was 31 years, with AD onset at median 32 weeks gestation. Forty-six patients (68.7%) had type A AD, of which 41 underwent immediate surgery. Overall maternal mortality was 10.4% (7/67) and fetal mortality was 26.9% (18/67). Compared with immediate surgery, selective surgery was associated with higher risk of composite maternal and fetal death (adjusted RR: 12.47 (95% CI 3.26 to 47.73); p=0.0002) and fetal death (adjusted RR: 8.77 (95% CI 2.33 to 33.09); p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate aortic surgery should be considered for type A AD at any stage of pregnancy or postpartum. For pregnant women with AD before fetal viability, surgical treatment with the fetus in utero should be considered. Management strategies should account for dissection type, gestational age, and fetal viability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05501145.
Assuntos
Dissecção Aórtica , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/mortalidade , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico , Dissecção Aórtica/terapia , Adulto , China/epidemiologia , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aneurisma Aórtico/mortalidade , Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Aneurisma Aórtico/terapia , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Aórtico/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda , Mortalidade Materna , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The assessment and management of totally implanted vascular access devices (TIVAD) prior to the administration of medications/fluids are vital to ensuring the risk of harm is mitigated. While numerous guidelines exist for the insertion and management of TIVAD, the level of evidence and external validity to support these guidelines is lacking. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with suboptimal TIVAD placement and with failure of TIVAD. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study (n=80) was conducted at a regional hospital and health service in Australia. Binomial logistic regression analysis was performed using a backward selection approach to establish variables associated suboptimal TIVAD placement and with TIVAD failure. FINDINGS: Significant associations were identified between the patient's primary diagnosis and suboptimal TIVAD insertion. Specifically, a prior diagnosis of breast cancer was associated with a decreased probability of optimal TIVAD tip placement (OR=0.236 (95% CI 0.058 to 0.960), p=0.044). A statistically significant association between TIVAD failure and the log of the heparinised saline flush rate and rate of undocumented flushes was also established. Further research is needed to identify and assess whether modification of these variables improves initial totally implantable venous access ports placement and risk of subsequent failure.
Assuntos
Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/normas , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/efeitos adversos , Austrália , Serviços de Saúde Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/normas , Fatores de Risco , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Modelos LogísticosRESUMO
BackgroundThe Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) initiative aims to support countries in improving care for people living with chronic conditions by collecting information on how people experience the quality and performance of primary and (generalist) ambulatory care services. This paper presents the development of the conceptual framework that underpins the rationale for and the instrumentation of the PaRIS survey. METHODS: The guidance of an international expert taskforce and the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators framework (2015) provided initial specifications for the framework. Relevant conceptual models and frameworks were then identified from searches in bibliographic databases (Medline, EMBASE and the Health Management Information Consortium). A draft framework was developed through narrative review. The final version was codeveloped following the participation of an international Patient advisory Panel, an international Technical Advisory Community and online international workshops with patient representatives. RESULTS: 85 conceptual models and frameworks were identified through searches. The final framework maps relationships between the following domains (and subdomains): patient-reported outcomes (symptoms, functioning, self-reported health status, health-related quality of life); patient-reported experiences of care (access, comprehensiveness, continuity, coordination, patient safety, person centeredness, self-management support, trust, overall perceived quality of care); health and care capabilities; health behaviours (physical activity, diet, tobacco and alcohol consumption), sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported chronic conditions; delivery system characteristics (clinic, main healthcare professional); health system, policy and context. DISCUSSION: The PaRIS conceptual framework has been developed through a systematic, accountable and inclusive process. It serves as the basis for the development of the indicators and survey instruments as well as for the generation of specific hypotheses to guide the analysis and interpretation of the findings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the association between a diagnosis of untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) and the development of mental illness. METHODS: This retrospective, propensity-score-matched cohort study was based on the nationwide South Korean database. The UIA diagnosis group included participants newly diagnosed with UIA between 2011 and 2019. For a well-matched control group, patients diagnosed with an acute upper respiratory infection but without UIA during the same period were selected through 1:4 matching based on propensity scores, which were calculated using age, sex, economic status, and comorbidities. The study's outcome measure encompassed the incidence of mental illnesses over a 10-year period, using International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision codes for anxiety, stress, depressive, bipolar, and eating disorders, insomnia, and alcohol or drug misuse. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 85â 438 participants with untreated UIAs (50.75% male; average age, 56.41 [±13.82] years; follow-up, 4.21 [±2.56] years) and 331â 123 controls (49.44% males; average age, 56.69 [±12.92] years; follow-up, 7.48 [±2.12] years) were compared. Incidence rate of mental illness was higher in the UIA group (113.07 versus 90.41 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 1.104 [95% CI, 1.089-1.119]). The risk of mental illness varied slightly by sex (males: hazard ratio, 1.131 [95% CI, 1.108-1.155]; females: hazard ratio, 1.082 [95% CI, 1.063-1.103]). Hazard ratios showed a U-shaped relationship with age, peaking in younger age groups, decreasing in middle-aged groups, and slightly increasing in older age groups, especially in patients with severe mental illness receiving psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a higher risk of mental illness in patients with UIA diagnosis in specific demographic groups, suggesting a possible psychological burden associated with UIAs. Clinicians treating cerebral aneurysms should be aware that the psychological burden caused by the diagnosis of UIA itself could contribute to mental illness and strive to provide comprehensive care for these patients.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Intracraniano , Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Idoso , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos de Coortes , Incidência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Contraception is crucial for safely timing pregnancies in patients with SLE. This study investigated predictors of contraception documentation in patients with SLE, and the alignment of contraception practices with the 2020 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines, within the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female patients (aged 18-44 years) with SLE were identified via International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/ICD-10 coding within the RISE registry, which includes data from rheumatology clinics across the USA. Eligible patients were required to have ≥1 clinical visit in 2019 (prepandemic) or between 1 April 2020 and 30 March 2021 (mid-pandemic). Adjusted multilevel logistic modelling assessed patient, provider and practice characteristics for associations with contraception documentation. Contraception patterns were identified and compared with the 2020 ACR guidelines. RESULTS: Contraception documentation rates were similar in the prepandemic and mid-pandemic groups (8.1% and 8.5%, respectively). Higher documentation rates were found in women who were younger, White, and had more visits, as well as those seen within a health system, by a female provider, and within specific regions and electronic health record (EHR) systems. Prescription of a teratogenic medication did not influence contraception documentation or type. Oestrogen-containing contraceptives were prescribed less often to women at high risk for thrombosis (26.2% with thrombotic risk vs 60.6% without, p<0.0001) and history of lupus nephritis (LN) (53.8% with history of LN vs 63.2% without, p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Practices participating in the RISE registry do not currently record contraception in the large majority of women with SLE, although increased documentation in some EHRs suggests that system changes may improve rates of documentation. Women at higher risk for thrombosis were less likely to receive oestrogen, suggesting that warnings against oestrogen use has impacted contraception prescription, although the limited documentation and limited contraception among women taking teratogenic medications suggest a high unmet need.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Feminino , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Saúde Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Reumatologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Resumo Fundamento Análises em grandes registros apontam desfechos desfavoráveis para mulheres submetidas à cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio (CRM), enquanto estudos randomizados sofrem com a falta de representatividade. Objetivo Comparar os resultados hospitalares ajustados entre homens e mulheres submetidos à CRM. Métodos Entre julho de 2017 e junho de 2019, 3991 pacientes foram submetidos à CRM primária isolada, tanto de forma eletiva como de urgência, em 5 hospitais de estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Para equilibrar as diferenças entre homens e mulheres, as populações foram ajustadas utilizando o Propensity Score Matching. Os desfechos considerados para análise foram os utilizados pelo STS Adult Database. As análises foram conduzidas no software R, considerando significância valores de p < 0,05. Resultados Após o Propensity Score Matching (1:1), cada grupo incluiu 1089 pacientes. Em relação às variáveis intraoperatórias os homens apresentaram maior tempo de CEC (p<0,001), tempo cirúrgico (p<0,001), número de anastomoses distais (p<0,001) e uso de enxertos arteriais. Em relação aos desfechos as mulheres apresentaram maior incidência de infecção de ferida profunda (p=0,006), tempo prolongado na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (p=0,002), maior necessidade do uso de balão intraórtico (p=0,04), maior taxa de transfusão sanguínea (p<0,001), maior readmissão hospitalar em até 30 dias após a cirurgia (p=0,002) e maior taxa de óbitos (p=0,03). Conclusões Apesar dos homens terem apresentado um maior tempo de CEC, maior número de enxertos arteriais e maior número de anastomoses distais, os resultados imediatos após CRM foram piores em mulheres.
Abstract Background Analyses of extensive registries indicate adverse outcomes for women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, while randomized studies often lack representativeness. Objective To compare adjusted hospital outcomes between men and women undergoing CABG. Methods From July 2017 to June 2019, 3991 patients underwent primary isolated CABG, both electively and urgently, in 5 hospitals in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. To mitigate demographic differences between men and women, populations were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). The outcomes considered for analysis were those used by the STS Adult Database. The analyses were performed using R software, with a significance set at p<0.05. Results After PSM (1:1), each group included 1089 patients. Regarding intraoperative variables, men exhibited longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (p<0.001), surgical time (p<0.001), a higher number of distal anastomoses (p<0.001), and increased use of arterial grafts. Regarding outcomes, women had a higher incidence of deep sternal wound infection (p=0.006), prolonged Intensive Care Unit stay (p=0.002), increased need for an intra-aortic balloon pump (p=0.04), higher blood transfusion rates (p<0.001), higher 30-day hospital readmission rates after surgery (p=0.002) and higher mortality rate (p=0.03). Conclusions Although men had longer CPB times, a greater number of arterial grafts, and a greater number of distal anastomoses, immediate results after CABG were poorer in women.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Over a decade ago, our study group showed improved outcomes among total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) patients given neuraxial versus general anesthesia. As the use of neuraxial anesthesia has increased and anesthesia practices evolve, updated analyses are critical to ensure if previously found differences still persist. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included elective THA/TKAs from 2006 to 2021 as recorded in the all-payor Premier Healthcare Database. Multivariable regression models measured the association between anesthesia type (neuraxial, general, combined) and several adverse outcomes (pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular events, pulmonary compromise, cardiac complications, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, all infections, acute renal failure, gastrointestinal complications, postoperative mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admissions, and blood transfusions); models were run separately by period (2006-2015 and 2016-2021) and THA/TKA. RESULTS: We identified 587,919 and 499,484 THAs for 2006-2015 and 2016-2021, respectively; this was 1,186,483 and 803,324 for TKAs. Among THAs, neuraxial anesthesia use increased from 10.7% in 2006 to 25.7% in 2021; during both time periods, specifically neuraxial versus general anesthesia was associated with lower odds for most adverse outcomes, with sometimes stronger (protective) effect estimates observed for 2016-2021 versus 2006-2015 (eg, acute renal failure OR 0.72 CI 0.65 to 0.80 vs OR 0.56 CI 0.50 to 0.63 and blood transfusion OR 0.91 CI 0.89 to 0.94 vs OR 0.44 CI 0.41 to 0.47, respectively; all p<0.001). Similar patterns existed for TKAs. CONCLUSION: These findings re-confirm our study group's decade-old study using more recent data and offer additional evidence toward the sustained benefit of neuraxial anesthesia in major orthopedic surgery.