Genetic and Epigenetic Associations with Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication of solid organ transplantation. PTDM prevalence varies due to different diabetes definitions. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of PTDM have been published based on random blood glucose levels, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The task of diagnosing PTDM continues to pose challenges, given the potential for diabetes to manifest at different time points after transplantation, thus demanding constant clinical vigilance and repeated testing. Interpreting HbA1c levels can be challenging after renal transplantation. Pre-transplant risk factors for PTDM include obesity, sedentary lifestyle, family history of diabetes, ethnicity (e.g., African-Caribbean or South Asian ancestry), and genetic risk factors. Risk factors for PTDM include immunosuppressive drugs, weight gain, hepatitis C, and cytomegalovirus infection. There is also emerging evidence that genetic and epigenetic variation in the organ transplant recipient may influence the risk of developing PTDM. This review outlines many known risk factors for PTDM and details some of the pathways, genetic variants, and epigenetic features associated with PTDM. Improved understanding of established and emerging risk factors may help identify people at risk of developing PTDM and may reduce the risk of developing PTDM or improve the management of this complication of organ transplantation.

Diabetic Kidney Disease in Post-Kidney Transplant Patients.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common occurrence in post-kidney transplantation and is associated with greater mortality, allograft failure, and increased risk of infections. The primary goal in the management of PTDM is to achieve glycemic control to minimize the risk of complications while balancing the need for immunosuppression to maintain the health of the transplanted kidney. This review summarizes the effects of maintenance immunosuppression and therapeutic options among kidney transplant recipients. Patients with PTDM are at increased risk of diabetic kidney disease development; therefore, in this review, we focus on evidence supporting the use of novel antidiabetic agents and discuss their benefits and potential side effects in detail.

Safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Evidence supporting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains scarce. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GLP-1RAs in this population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases from inception through May 2023. Clinical trials and observational studies that reported on the safety or efficacy outcomes of GLP-1RAs in adult KTRs were included. Kidney graft function, glycaemic and metabolic parameters, weight, cardiovascular outcomes and adverse events were evaluated. Outcome measures used for analysis included pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42023426190). Results: Nine cohort studies with a total of 338 KTRs were included. The median follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range 6-23). While treatment with GLP-1RAs did not yield a significant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate [SMD -0.07 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI -0.64-0.50)] or creatinine [SMD -0.08 mg/dl (95% CI -0.44-0.28)], they were associated with a significant decrease in urine protein:creatinine ratio [SMD -0.47 (95% CI -0.77 to -0.18)] and haemoglobin A1c levels [MD -0.85% (95% CI -1.41 to -0.28)]. Total daily insulin dose, weight and body mass index also decreased significantly. Tacrolimus levels remained stable [MD -0.43 ng/ml (95% CI -0.99 to 0.13)]. Side effects were primarily nausea and vomiting (17.6%), diarrhoea (7.6%) and injection site pain (5.4%). Conclusions: GLP-1RAs are effective in reducing proteinuria, improving glycaemic control and supporting weight loss in KTRs, without altering tacrolimus levels. Gastrointestinal symptoms are the main side effects.

Micro-vascular complications of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in renal transplant recipients- an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) ranges from 2.5% to 20% in kidney transplant recipients. Diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic kidney disease (DKD), and distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) are the microvascular complications frequently seen in both type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the data regarding these complications in patients with PTDM is lacking. METHOD: A retrospective and prospective observational study of PTDM conducted at a tertiary care hospital from November 2018 to December 2020. 115 kidney transplant recipients who had PTDM of ≥5 years duration were included and analysed. RESULTS: The mean duration of PTDM was 8.8 ± 3.0 years, and the mean of all available HbA1c values was 7.0 ± 0.9%. while none of the patients had evidence of diabetic retinopathy on direct ophthalmoscopy, 37.4% of patients (n = 43) had DSPN and this was associated with the duration of PTDM and age. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 59.24 ± 21.82 ml/min/1.73m2, and patients had a median proteinuria of 620 mg/day (IQR 1290). Out of 115 patients, 20% of them (n = 23) underwent graft kidney biopsy, and 10 biopsies were diagnosed as de-novo DKD. Patients with biopsy proven DKD had a mean PTDM duration of 143.3 ± 52.4 months; a mean HbA1c level of 7.9 ± 1.3%; a mean eGFR of 44.8 ± 21.8 ml/min; and a median proteinuria of 2653 mg (IQR 2758). An additional analysis of all 23 biopsied patients showed that HbA1c level and degree of proteinuria were significantly associated with de-novo DKD. CONCLUSION: PTDM in transplant patients had milder microvascular complications than usually expected in Type 1/2 diabetes in non-transplant patients. DR was not strongly associated with DKD in PTDM patients. Furthermore, de-novo DKD development was associated with poor glycaemic control and increased proteinuria.

Glucometabolism in Kidney Transplant Recipients with and without Posttransplant Diabetes: Focus on Beta-Cell Function.

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Pathophysiologically, whether beta-cell dysfunction rather than insulin resistance may be the predominant defect in PTDM has been a matter of debate. The aim of the present analysis was to compare glucometabolism in kidney transplant recipients with and without PTDM. To this aim, we included 191 patients from a randomized controlled trial who underwent oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) 6 months after transplantation. We derived several basic indices of beta-cell function and insulin resistance as well as variables from mathematical modeling for a more robust beta-cell function assessment. Mean ± standard deviation of the insulin sensitivity parameter PREDIM was 3.65 ± 1.68 in PTDM versus 5.46 ± 2.57 in NON-PTDM. Model-based glucose sensitivity (indicator of beta-cell function) was 68.44 ± 57.82 pmol∙min-1∙m-2∙mM-1 in PTDM versus 143.73 ± 112.91 pmol∙min-1∙m-2∙mM-1 in NON-PTDM, respectively. Both basic indices and model-based parameters of beta-cell function were more than 50% lower in patients with PTDM, indicating severe beta-cell impairment. Nonetheless, some defects in insulin sensitivity were also present, although less marked. We conclude that in PTDM, the prominent defect appears to be beta-cell dysfunction. From a pathophysiological point of view, patients at high risk for developing PTDM may benefit from intensive treatment of hyperglycemia over the insulin secretion axis.

Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus after liver transplant and the impact of family history of diabetes in a Mexican cohort.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a serious long-term complication that has a negative impact on graft and patient survival. The purpose of the present study was to describe the incidence of PTDM in a Mexican cohort and evaluate its association with a previous family history of diabetes (FHD). METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). The primary outcome was time from LT to PTDM. The diagnosis of PTDM was established using the ADA criteria. A mediation analysis that used adjusted Cox regression models and considered pretransplant prediabetes a mediator was performed, to determine the total effect and direct effect of FHD on PTDM. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 41 months; 19.2% (n = 29) had pretransplant diabetes. During the follow-up time, 15% of patients developed PTDM (n = 23), with an incidence rate of 4.71 cases/100 person-years. PTDM was significantly higher in patients with FHD, compared with those with no FHD (8.72 cases/100 person-years vs 2.04 cases/100 person-years, respectively; p = 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio of PTDM for FHD was 4.14 (95% CI 1.60-10.7), p = 0.005) and 3.48 (95% CI 1.35-9.01, p = 0.010), when further controlled for pretransplant prediabetes. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of PTDM was similar to that reported in most international studies. As with type 2 diabetes, family history plays an important role in the development of PTDM, even after accounting for pretransplant prediabetes. Patients with FHD should undergo a stricter metabolic program.

Glomerular proteomic profiling reveals early differences between preexisting and de novo type 2 diabetes in human renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM), either preexisting or developing after transplantation, remains a crucial clinical problem in kidney transplantation. To obtain insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying PTDM development and early glomerular damage before the development of histologically visible diabetic kidney disease, we comparatively analysed the proteome of histologically normal glomeruli from patients with PTDM and normoglycaemic (NG) transplant recipients. Moreover, to assess specificities inherent in PTDM, we also comparatively evaluated glomerular proteomes from transplant recipients with preexisting type 2 DM (T2DM). METHODS: Protocol biopsies were obtained from adult NG, PTDM and T2DM patients one year after kidney transplantation. Biopsies were formalin-fixed and embedded in paraffin, and glomerular cross-sections were microdissected. A total of 4 NG, 7 PTDM and 6 T2DM kidney biopsies were used for the analysis. The proteome was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Relative differences in protein abundance and significantly dysregulated pathways were analysed. RESULTS: Proteins involved in cell adhesion, immune response, leukocyte transendothelial filtration, and cell localization and organization were less abundant in glomeruli from PTDM patients than in those from NG patients, and proteins associated with supramolecular fibre organization and protein-containing complex binding were more abundant in PTDM patients. Overall, proteins related to adherens and tight junctions and those related to the immune system, including leukocyte transendothelial migration, were more abundant in NG patients than in transplanted patients with DM, irrespective of the timing of its development. However, proteins included in cell‒cell junctions and adhesion, insulin resistance, and vesicle-mediated transport were all less abundant in PTDM patients than in T2DM patients. CONCLUSIONS: The glomerular proteome profile differentiates PTDM from NG and T2DM, suggesting specific pathogenetic mechanisms. Further studies are warranted to validate these results, potentially leading to an improved understanding of PTDM kidney transplant pathophysiology and to the identification of novel biomarkers.

Influence of Early Postoperative Basal Insulin Treatment and Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus Risk on Health-Related Quality of Life in Kidney Transplant Recipients-An Analysis of Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) improves after kidney transplantation (KT) but declines over time. Studies on the effect of early postoperative basal insulin therapy on HRQOL after KT, especially KTRs at high risk of developing post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are missing. Data from a randomized controlled trial on 148 non-diabetic KTRs were analyzed. HRQOL using the KDQOL-SF™ was compared in KTRs who either received early postoperative basal insulin therapy or standard-of-care and in KTRs at risk of developing PTDM. Determinants of HRQOL outcomes were investigated using multivariable linear regression analysis. In total, 148 patients completed the KDQOL-SF at baseline. Standard-of-care or early basal insulin therapy after KT did not influence HRQOL. Overall, KT improved the mental (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores at 6-month after KT, which remained stable during further follow-up visits. However, patients at high-risk for PTDM had significantly greater impairment in the PCS score (baseline, 24 months) without differences in MCS scores. In the multivariable regression analysis, allograft function and hemoglobin levels were associated with decreased MCS and PCS scores, respectively. A limitation of the study is the fact that only around 50% of the ITP-NODAT study patients participated in the HRQOL evaluation. Still, our data clearly show that early basal insulin therapy does not affect HRQOL after KT but is negatively influenced by classical clinical factors and PTDM-risk at 24 months after KT. The latter might be influenced by older age.

Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus: Recent Developments in Pharmacological Management of Hyperglycemia.

CONTEXT: The management of solid-organ transplantation is rapidly evolving, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), which is increasingly common, is a barrier to transplant success, adversely impacting infection rates, allograft survival, cardiovascular disease, quality of life, and overall mortality. Currently, the management of PTDM relies primarily on intensified insulin therapy. However, emerging studies report that several noninsulin glucose-lowering agents are safe and effective in improving metabolic control and enhancing treatment adherence. More importantly, their use in PTDM can potentially transform the long-term management of these complex patients, as some glucose-lowering agents may provide benefits beyond glycemic control. For instance, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors may offer cardiorenal protection, and pioglitazone may treat nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This review will focus on the pharmacological management of PTDM and the emerging evidence for noninsulin glucose-lowering agents in this population. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Evidence from observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: PTDM adversely affects the outcomes of infection, organ survival, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Insulin therapy has been the drug of choice but is associated with weight gain and hypoglycemia. In contrast, noninsulin agents appear safe and may provide additional benefits, such as cardiorenal protection with SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RA, and cardiometabolic benefits with pioglitazone, in patients undergoing solid-organ transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal care of patients with PTDM requires close monitoring and the early involvement of the endocrinologist as part of a multidisciplinary team. Noninsulin glucose-lowering agents will likely play an increasing role as more long-term, controlled studies become available in this setting.

Hypoglycemia with insulin in post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

INTRODUCTION: To prevent hypoglycemic episodes, the management of insulin therapy against post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is important. We compared glargine (long-acting insulin) versus NPH isophane (intermediate-acting insulin) as an armamentarium against PTDM. Indeed, the study evaluated PTDM patients with hypoglycemic episodes treated with isophane or glargine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated a total number of 231 living-donor renal transplant recipients with PTDM of age ≥ 18 years admitted to the hospital between January 2017 and September 2021. However, patients taking hypoglycemic agents before transplantation were excluded from this study. Out of 231 patients, 52 (22.15%) suffered from PTDM out of whom 26 were treated with glargine or isophane. RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria, out of 52 PTDM patients 23 were included in the study: 13 PTDM patients were treated with glargine, whereas 10 PTDM patients with isophane. Our analysis revealed 12 episodes of hypoglycemia in glargine-treated PTDM patients compared to 3 in isophane-treated PTDM patients (p = 0.056). Clinically, 9 out of 15 hypoglycemic episodes were nocturnal (60%). Furthermore, no other risk factors were observed in our study population. Detailed analysis showed that both groups had equivalent doses of immunosuppressants and oral hypoglycemic agents. The odds ratio for hypoglycemia in the group treated with isophane compared to that treated with glargine was 0.224 (95% CI, 0.032-1.559). Glargine users recorded significantly lower blood sugar levels before lunch, dinner and at bedtime with p-values of 0.001, 0.009 and 0.001 respectively. A better hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was seen in the glargine vs. isophane group (6.98 ± 0.52 vs. 7.45 ± 0.49, p-value 0.03). CONCLUSION: The study shows better blood sugar control with long-acting insulin analog, glargine, than with intermediate-actin analog, isophane. Overall, a higher number of hypoglycemic episodes was nocturnal. Long term safety of long-acting insulin analogs needs to be further studied.

Feasibility and performance of continuous glucose monitoring in hyperglycemia after lung transplantation.

Background: Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus (PTDM) affects 20%-40% of lung transplant recipients within five years, impacting rejection, infection, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is used in diabetes but not well-studied in PTDM. Objective: This study assessed CGM performance in detecting hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia post-lung transplantation, compared to self-monitoring blood glucose. Methods: A prospective pilot study included 15 lung transplant patients (mean age 58.6 years; 53.3% men; 73.3% with pre-transplantation diabetes) managing hyperglycemia with insulin. Patients used a blinded CGM and self-monitored glucose for ten days. Data were categorized (% time in range, % high, % very high, % low, % very low) and compared using paired t-tests. Results: CGM showed superior hyperglycemia detection. Mean differences for "% very high", "% high", and "% high and % very high" were 7.12 (95% CI, 1.8-12.4), 11.1 (95% CI, 3.5-18.8), and 18.3 (95% CI: 7.37-29.24), respectively. No significant difference was found for "% low and % very low". All patients reported a positive CGM experience. Conclusion: CGM use post-lung transplantation seems feasible and offers advantages in detecting hyperglycemia and in optimizing glucose management. Study limitations include a small sample size, requiring larger studies to assess glycemic control, hypoglycemia detection, and transplant outcomes.

Fast Tacrolimus Metabolism Does Not Promote Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) after kidney transplantation induced by tacrolimus is an important issue. Fast tacrolimus metabolism, which can be estimated by concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio, is associated with increased nephrotoxicity and unfavorable outcomes after kidney transplantation. Herein, we elucidate whether fast tacrolimus metabolism also increases the risk for PTDM. Data from 596 non-diabetic patients treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression at the time of kidney transplantation between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The median follow-up time after kidney transplantation was 4.7 years (IQR 4.2 years). Our analysis was complemented by experimental modeling of fast and slow tacrolimus metabolism kinetics in cultured insulin-producing pancreatic cells (INS-1 cells). During the follow-up period, 117 (19.6%) patients developed PTDM. Of all patients, 210 (35.2%) were classified as fast metabolizers (C/D ratio < 1.05 ng/mL × 1/mg). Fast tacrolimus metabolizers did not have a higher incidence of PTDM than slow tacrolimus metabolizers (p = 0.496). Consistent with this, insulin secretion and the viability of tacrolimus-treated INS-1 cells exposed to 12 h of tacrolimus concentrations analogous to the serum profiles of fast or slow tacrolimus metabolizers or to continuous exposure did not differ (p = 0.286). In conclusion, fast tacrolimus metabolism is not associated with increased incidence of PTDM after kidney transplantation, either in vitro or in vivo. A short period of incubation of INS-1 cells with tacrolimus using different concentration profiles led to comparable effects on cell viability and insulin secretion in vitro. Consistent with this, in our patient, collective fast Tac metabolizers did not show a higher PTDM incidence compared to slow metabolizers.

Effect of dual inhibition of DPP4 and SGLT2 on tacrolimus-induced diabetes mellitus and nephrotoxicity in a rat model.

Sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) or dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor (DPP4i) is a newer anti-diabetic drug in type II diabetes mellitus (DM), but their use in tacrolimus (TAC)-induced DM is still undetermined. We performed this study to evaluate the effect of these two drugs in TAC-induced DM and nephrotoxicity in ex vivo and in vivo. In the experimental Sprague Dawley rat model of TAC-induced DM and nephrotoxicity, dual inhibition of DPP4 and SGLT2 significantly decreased blood glucose level, HbA1C and increased plasma insulin levels and pancreatic islet size compared with each drug. In the kidney, dual inhibition improved renal function decreased interstitial fibrosis and profibrotic cytokines compared with DPP4i and SGLT2i alone. Increased oxidative stress by TAC was remarkably decreased with DPP4i or SGLT2i in serum, pancreatic and renal tissues and this decrease was much more significant in the combination group. In in vitro study, TAC decreased the cell viability of human kidney-2(HK-2) cells and insulin-secreting beta-cell-derived line(INS-1) cells. SGLT2i protected TAC-induced cell death in HK-2 cells, but not in INS-1 cells. The addition of DPP4i to SGLT2i compensated for a lack of protective effect of SGLT2i on INS-1 cells. This finding provides the rationale for the combined treatment of SGLG2i and DPP4i in TAC-induced DM and nephrotoxicity.

Optimal use of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney transplant recipients.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), a glucosuric agent initially approved for use as an antidiabetic agent, was unexpectedly found to confer cardio-and reno-protective effects in individuals with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite mounting evidence suggesting that SGLT2i provides cardio- and reno-protective benefits in both diabetic and non-diabetic and in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in the general population, reservations for its use in the transplant setting persist due to concerns for increased risk of genital mycotic and urinary tract infections. A comprehensive review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i use in diabetic kidney transplant recipients is herein presented followed by authors' opinion on its optimal use in this patient population.

Obesity and Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus in Kidney Transplantation.

Worldwide, the prevalence obesity, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease is increasing apace. The relationship between obesity and chronic kidney disease is multidimensional, especially when diabetes is also considered. The optimal treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease includes the need to consider weight loss as part of the treatment. The exact relationship between obesity and kidney function before and after transplantation is not as clear as previously imagined. Historically, patients with obesity had worse outcomes following kidney transplantation and weight loss before surgery was encouraged. However, recent studies have found less of a correlation between obesity and transplant outcomes. Transplantation itself is also a risk factor for developing diabetes, a condition known as post-transplant diabetes mellitus, and is related to the use of immunosuppressive medications and weight gain following transplantation. Newer classes of anti-diabetic medications, namely SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists, are increasingly being recognized, not only for their ability to control diabetes, but also for their cardio and renoprotective effects. This article reviews the current state of knowledge on the management of obesity and post-transplant diabetes mellitus for kidney transplant patients.

Current Pharmacological Intervention and Medical Management for Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation is common in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Both pretransplant and post-transplant diabetes mellitus are associated with increased kidney allograft failure and mortality. Glucose management may be challenging for kidney transplant recipients. The pathophysiology and pattern of hyperglycemia in patients following kidney transplantation is different from those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with pre-existing and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, there is limited data on the management of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation. The following article discusses the nomenclature and diagnosis of pre- and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, the impact of transplant-related hyperglycemia on patient and kidney allograft outcomes, risk factors and potential pathogenic mechanisms of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation, glucose management before and after transplantation, and modalities for prevention of post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

Long-term Management of the Adult Liver Transplantation Recipients.

The survival of liver transplantation (LT) recipients has been improved remarkably in short-term. The major causes of mortality in long-term include nonimmunological causes such as cardiovascular, de novo malignancy, chronic kidney disease, and recurrence of primary disease. Rejection-related mortality is rare in the long-term after LT. We discuss nonrejection causes of long-term morbidity/mortality, risk factors, and management strategies in LT recipients. In addition, we discuss osteoporosis, contraception, and pregnancy in LT recipients.

Long-term efficacy and safety of anti-hyperglycaemic agents in new-onset diabetes after transplant: Results from outpatient-based 1-year follow-up and a brief review of treatment options.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of various anti-hyperglycaemic agents (AHA) for glycaemic control in NODAT, in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) during 1-year outpatient follow-up. METHODS: We collected FPG, PPG, HbA1c, serum creatinine, eGFR, blood tacrolimus level, hypoglycaemia and body weight values from an existing database of KTRs diagnosed to have NODAT. Those newly initiated on AHA over 3 months post-transplant; received standard triple immunosuppressive therapy; and followed up for 1-year after referral, were included. RESULTS: In ninety-five patients' (Male = 65), mean decrease at 1-year from baseline in FPG (185.01 ± 62.11 mg/dL), PPG (293.21 ± 85.23 mg/dL) and HbA1c (8.48 ± 1.08%) was 67.09, 126.11 and 1.4 respectively (p < 0.0001). At 1-year, mean HbA1c was 7.08 ± 0.38%, ninety-one patients achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.5%. Fifty-two patients received oral combination therapy based on linagliptin/metformin/repaglinide/gliclazide, 19 received insulin-based regimen, and 24 received linagliptin monotharapey. Thirty patients reported hypoglycaemia (10 with gliclazide and 15 with insulin) and fifty patients gained body-weight at 1-year. Mean serum creatinine and eGFR significantly improved by 0.29 and 15.77 from baseline of 1.56 ± 0.62 mg/dL and 53.95 ± 16.10 mL/min/1.73 m2 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant proportion of NODAT patients achieved long-term glycemic control with improved renal function. Combination therapy was needed in most within 1-year. Linagliptin monotherapy was effective, without producing hypoglycaemia or weight gain.

pre-existing diabetes and PTDM in kidney transplant recipients: how to handle immunosuppression.

INTRODUCTION: Preexisting diabetes (PD) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are common and severe comorbidities posttransplantation. The immunosuppressive regimens are modifiable risk factors. AREAS COVERED: We reviewed Pubmed and Cochrane database and we summarize the mechanisms and impacts of available immunosuppressive treatments on the risk of PD and PTDM. We also assess the possible management of these drugs to improve glycemic parameters while considering risks inherent in transplantation. EXPERT OPINION: PD i) increases the risk of sepsis, ii) is an independent risk factor for infection-related mortality, and iii) increases acute rejection risk. Regarding PTDM development i) immunosuppressive strategies without corticosteroids significantly reduce the risk but the price may be a higher incidence of rejection; ii) minimization or rapid withdrawal of steroids are two valuable approaches; iii) the diabetogenic role of calcineurin inhibitors(CNIs) is also well-described and is more important for tacrolimus than for cyclosporine. Reducing tacrolimus-exposure may improve glycemic parameters but also has a higher risk of rejection. PTDM risk is higher in patients that receive sirolimus compared to mycophenolate mofetil. Finally, conversion from CNIs to belatacept may offer the best benefits to PTDM-recipients in terms of glycemic parameters, graft and patient-outcomes.