Accuracy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion With and Without a Navigation-Linked High-Speed Drill: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation provides high stability but poses a risk of nerve and vascular injury. Although useful for reducing CPS deviation rates, navigation systems cannot completely eliminate deviation. This study aimed to compare two methods for creating insertion paths, one using a navigation-linked high-speed drill (NAVI drill) and the other using conventional manual probing. METHODS: Our study comprised 104 patients with 509 CPSs at the C3-6 level who were treated at our institution between 2017 and 2023. CPS deviations were graded according to the Neo classification system, and the deviation direction (medial, lateral, cranial, or caudal) was assessed. Complications associated with CPS deviation were also investigated. We compared cases that used the NAVI drill (Group M) with those that used manual probing (Group N). RESULTS: Group M included 45 cases (252 screws), and Group N included 59 cases (257 screws). The CPS deviation rate was grade 1 or higher in 14.7% and 17.1% of cases in Groups M and N, respectively (p = 0.469). It was grade 2 or higher in 1.2% and 4.3% of cases in Groups M and N, respectively (p = 0.222). The medial, lateral, caudal, and cranial deviation direction rates were 56.8%, 2.7%, 40.5%, and 0% in Group M and 13.6%, 72.7%, 11.4%, and 2.3% in Group N, respectively (p < 0.001). In one case in Group N, a grade 3 lateral deviation resulted in vertebral artery injury (VAI). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the NAVI drill was associated with a slightly lower, albeit insignificant, CPS deviation rate. However, it significantly lowered the proportion of lateral deviations. Therefore, the NAVI drill is a useful tool for preventing VAI.

Three-dimensional-printed guide plate for direct percutaneous pedicle screw implantation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 162 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the impact of three-dimensional (3D)-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery. METHODS: Overall, 162 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF at Tai'an City Central Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The studied variables included operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, postoperative drainage volume, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability Index (ODI) score (preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery), and intervertebral fusion rate at 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The conventional group included 99 patients who underwent a conventional procedure, while the 3D printing group included 63 patients who underwent 3D-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation. The conventional group required more times of positioning needle punctures than the 3D printing group (22.2 ± 5.9 vs. 16.1 ± 4.9). The operation and fluoroscopy time were also longer in the former group (183.5 ± 51.1 min vs. 148.8 ± 40.3 min and 30.2 ± 5.9 s vs. 24.1 ± 4.9 s, respectively). In 3D printing group, lower back pain VAS scores and ODI scores at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery were observed. There were no significant differences in terms of the volumes of intraoperative blood loss; postoperative lower limb pain VAS scores; and interbody fusion rate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The novel 3D-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation can achieve better amelioration of back pain and recovery of function. It also reduced the times of positioning needle puncture and fluoroscopy time during percutaneous screw placement surgery and reduced the duration of surgery.

A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study.

Introduction: Pedicle screws are commonly used in fixation to treat various spinal disorders. However, screw loosening is a prevalent complication, particularly in patients with osteoporosis. Various biomechanical studies have sought to address this issue, but the optimal depth and trajectory to increase the fixation strength of pedicle screws remain controversial. Therefore, a biomechanical study was conducted using finite element models. Methods: Three-dimensional finite element models of the L3 vertebrae were developed from the preoperative computed tomography images of nine patients with osteoporosis and nine patients without who underwent spine surgery. Unicortical and bicortical pedicle screws were inserted into the center and into the anterior wall of the vertebrae, respectively, in different trajectories in the sagittal plane: straightforward, cephalad, and caudal. Subsequently, three different external loads were applied to each pedicle screw at the entry point: axial pullout, craniocaudal, and lateromedial loads. Nonlinear analysis was conducted to examine the fixation strength of the pedicle screws. Results: Irrespective of osteoporosis, the bicortical pedicle screws had greater fixation strength than the unicortical pedicle screws in all trajectories and external loads. The fixation strength of the bicortical pedicle screws was not substantially different among the trajectories against any external loads in the nonosteoporotic vertebrae. However, the fixation strength of the bicortical pedicle screws against craniocaudal load in the cephalad trajectory was considerably greater than those in the caudal (P=0.016) and straightforward (P=0.023) trajectories in the osteoporotic vertebrae. However, this trend was not observed in pullout and lateromedial loads. Conclusions: Our results indicate that bicortical pedicle screws should be used, regardless of whether the patient has osteoporosis or not. Furthermore, pedicle screws should be inserted in the cephalad trajectory in patients with osteoporosis.

Ultrasonography-guided canal decompression combined with vertebroplasty and cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation for stage III Kümmell's disease with neurological deficits: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty is the preferred procedure for stage I and II Kümmell's diseases (KDs), but there exist controversies on the operative option of stage III KD. This study aimed at exploring the safety and efficacy of ultrasonography-guided canal decompression (UG-CD) combined with vertebroplasty and cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CA-PSF) for treating stage III KD with neurological deficit (ND). METHODS: Between September 2017 and December 2023, all patients who received the UG-CD combined with vertebroplasty and CA-PSF for managing stage III KD with NDs were reviewed retrospectively with their demographic and operation data, and complications recorded. Besides, the scores of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), together with imaging data including the kyphotic Cobb angle (KCA), wedge angle (WA), spinal canal area (SCA) at the narrowest level as well as anterior (AHR) and middle (MHR) height ratios were measured and compared between pre- and post-operation. RESULTS: A total of eleven patients with a mean age of 70.09 ± 2.98 years old were included in our study with their surgical time, hospitalization length, blood loss, and follow-up time being 150.91 ± 17.94 min, 202.09 ± 39.95 ml, 8.18 ± 1.17 days, and 16.91 ± 4.09 months, respectively. During the final follow-up, the KCA, WA, VAS scores, ODI scores, AHR, MHR, and SCA were significantly improved (P < 0.01). Intraoperatively, one case suffered a transient decrease in the motor evoked potential. Another case experienced a cerebrospinal fluid leakage postoperatively that was then successfully treated. CONCLUSION: UG-CD combined with vertebroplasty and CA-PSF could be a feasible procedure for safely and effectively handling stage III KD with NDs.

Analysis on the related factors of misplacement of freehand pedicle screws via posterior approach in degenerative scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: To study the risk factors associated with misplacement of freehand pedicle screws through a posterior approach for degenerative scoliosis. METHODS: A total of 204 patients who underwent posterior pedicle screw-rod system surgery for degenerative scoliosis in our hospital from December 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, radiographic accuracy, and surgery-related information were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included. A total of 2496 screws were placed. 2373 (95.07%) were in good position. Misplacement screws were 123 (4.93%). None of the patients had postoperative spinal nerve symptoms due to screw malposition. The misplacement rate of thoracic (T10-T12) pedicle screws was 11.11% (60/540). Misplacement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine (L1-L5) was 3.22% (63/1956). Age, gender, surgeon, and operation time had no significant effect on misplacement of pedicle screws (P>0.05). Body mass index, Hu value, number of screw segments, Cobb angle, vertebral rotation, and spinal canal morphology had some correlation with pedicle screw misplacement. Among them, BMI, Hu value, number of screw segments, Cobb angle, and vertebral rotation grade were independent risk factors for PS misplacement (P<0.05). The height of the posterior superior iliac spine had a significant effect on pedicle screw misplacement in the lower lumbar spine (L4/5) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: BMI, Hu value, number of screw levels, Cobb angle, and vertebral rotation grade were independent risk factors for pedicle screw misplacement in patients with degenerative scoliosis. Posterior superior iliac spine height has a large impact on PS placement in the lower lumbar spine. Patients with degenerative scoliosis should be preoperatively planned for the size and direction of the placed screws by X-ray and CT three-dimensional, to reduce the misplacement rate of pedicle screws.

Practice Pattern Variations in the Use of Neuromonitoring, Image Guidance, and Robotics for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Based on a Nationwide Neurosurgery Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar pedicle screw placement surgery involves various assistive technologies, including fluoroscopic, stereotactic, or robotic navigation and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). We aimed to discern neurosurgeons' preferences for screw placement techniques and IONM utility, while also considering the influence of experience. METHODS: A survey was distributed to members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons using REDCap software, collecting demographic data and querying preferred techniques for screw placement and IONM modalities. Opinions on IONM use during stereotactic or robotic navigation were also obtained. Responses were analyzed using Pearson's Chi Square and ANOVA tests via R software. RESULTS: Of 188 responses, 35.5% (n=67) reported 1-10 years of experience and 64.5% (n=121) reported ≥11 years. Less experienced neurosurgeons utilized stereotactic navigation more than those with greater experience (p < 0.001). Seasoned neurosurgeons utilized fluoroscopic guidance more often (p = 0.038). Less experienced neurosurgeons employed 1.69 (±0.11) techniques for their fixation surgeries compared to 1.50 (±0.0.8) for more experienced neurosurgeons. Robotic navigation utilization was low and comparable between the groups. Surgeons employing multiple techniques utilized t-EMG the most (62.1%, p = 0.024). No strong opinions emerged on the necessity of multi-modality IONM with robotic or stereotactic navigation. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey shows that stereotactic navigation is the predominant technique for pedicle screw placement among less experienced neurosurgeons, with seasoned neurosurgeons leaning towards fluoroscopic guidance. Robotic guidance was the least utilized technique with no observed difference based on experience. Neurosurgeons employing multiple techniques use IONM the most, compared with surgeons who only use stereotactic navigation and/or robotic guidance.

Impact of landmark crater creation on improving accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in robot-assisted scoliosis surgery.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the impact of the Landmark Crater (LC) method on pedicle perforation rates in robot-guided surgery for pediatric scoliosis for each pedicle diameter. METHODS: Seventy-six scoliosis patients underwent robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion. The cohort consisted of 19 male and 57 female patients, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 17.5 ± 7.7 years and a preoperative Cobb angle of 57.0 ± 18.5°. The LC method is a method in which craters that serves as a landmark are created in advance at the planned PS insertion site of all pedicles within the intraoperative CT imaging area. The patients were divided into the LC group, in which PS insertion was performed using the LC method, and the control group using the conventional PS insertion method. Overall and pedicle perforation rates for each pedicle outer diameter were compared between the groups by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The LC group exhibited a significantly lower pedicle major perforation rate than did the control group (2.7% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.001). The perforation rates in pedicles with a pedicle outer diameter > 6 mm, 4-6 mm, 2-4 mm, and < 2 mm were 0.61%, 1.6%, 5.1%, and 21%, in the LC group and 0.75%, 4.1%, 12%, and 50% in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: In robot-assisted surgery for pediatric scoliosis, the LC method enabled significantly lower pedicle perforation rates over the conventional method. Both the LC and conventional methods exhibited higher perforation rates for smaller pedicle diameters.

A complete facet resection and cervical pedicle screw placement enhances both gross total resection and motion preservation for the cervical spinal dumbbell tumor.

OBJECTIVE: To describe single-index-level fusion surgery using a cervical pedicle screw (CPS) after the complete facet resection of spinal dumbbell tumors and to compare it with partial facet resection without fusion. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgery for dumbbell-shaped cervical spine tumors. They were categorized into the fused group (complete facet resection with fusion using CPS) and the unfused group (partial facet resection without fusion). We compared demographics, tumor characteristics, resection rates (gross total, subtotal, or partial), and regrowth rates between the groups. Complete facet resection was performed for maximal tumor removal. In the fused group, single-index-level fusion was achieved using CPS. Despite tumor-associated erosion of the index vertebra's pedicle and/or lateral mass, the CPS was directly inserted into the vertebral body through an imaginary virtual pedicle without a lateral mass or pedicle purchase. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients underwent surgery for dumbbell-shaped cervical tumors; half were classified into each group. There were no significant differences in demographic or tumor characteristics, including Asazuma classification, or histological diagnosis (P > 0.05). However, the gross total resection rate was significantly higher in the fused group (16/17, 94.1% vs 9/17, 52.9%; P-value = 0.011). Tumor recurrence was observed in three (17.6%) patients in the unfused group; no recurrence (0%) occurred in the fused group. CONCLUSION: Complete facet resection with fusion using CPS significantly increased the gross total tumor removal rate, compared with partial resection without fusion. Therefore, CPS improved fusion surgery for maximal motion preservation, resulting in single-level fusion surgery.

A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique-Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) technique requires a very precise entry point of the Jamshidi needle, which leads to repeated adjustments, damaging the pedicle and increasing radiation exposure. This study was designed to propose an improved percutaneous pedicle screw fixation technique-trajectory dynamic adjustment (TDA) technique, and evaluate its feasibility and assess the clinical outcomes. METHOD: A total of 445 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis associated with instability from June 2017 to May 2022 were included in the retrospective study. They were randomly separated into two groups. Two hundred thirty-one patients underwent TDA technique (TDA group). Two hundred fourteen patients underwent traditional PPSF technique (PPSF group). All patients underwent postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of screw placement, superior facet joint violation (FJV). The evaluated clinical outcomes were needle insertion time, radiation exposure, blood loss, hospital stay, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for lower back pain (LBP), and leg pain, lumbar interbody fusion rate, and postoperative complications. The independent-sample t test and paired t-test were used for continuous data. The contingency table and Mann-Whitney U test were used for categorical data. RESULTS: The time of the insertion in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). Similarly, the fluoroscopy frequency in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of clinically acceptable screws between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the lateral screw misplacement in TDA group was higher. Moreover, FJV rate was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). In both TDA group and PPSF group, postoperative back and leg pain and the JOA score were significantly improved (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the pre- and postoperative VAS score for back and leg pain and the JOA score, JOA recovery rate, intervertebral fusion rate, and complications rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to traditional PPSF technique, TDA technique is a safer and more effective procedure which has shorter surgical time, lower radiation exposure, and lower facet joint violation rate.

Effect of pedicle screw misplacement on the pull-out strength using personalized finite element modeling.

Intraoperative misplacement of vertebral pedicle screws is prevalent. While a pedicle screw misplacement of up to 4 mm is often considered safe by clinical standards, this may reduce the pull-out strength thereby increasing the risk of postoperative screw loosening. This study aimed to compare the pull-out strength of ideally-placed and misplaced pedicle screws via personalized finite element (FE) modeling simulations. Three-dimensional FE models to simulate pull-out tests of pedicle screws were constructed. Vertebral geometries and material properties were both determined based on computed tomography images from lumbar spine (L1-L5) of a 29-year-old healthy male individual. Pedicle screws were bilaterally placed under four conditions: ideal placement (no cortex perforation) as well as minor medial, minor lateral, and severe lateral misplacements causing cortex perforations. Minor and severe misplacements corresponded to, respectively, grades C and D of the Gertzbein classification. After meshing and voxel-based vertebral material assignments based on two distinct mappings from literature, pull-out strengths were estimated by considering a strain-based damage model to accurately simulate bone fractures. Results indicated that the mean of FE-predicted pull-out forces for ideally-placed screws (1583 and 2412 N for material mappings 1 and 2, respectively) was within the range of previous experimental data (ranging from 1016 to 2443 N) thus confirming the model validation. The mean of all pull-out forces for each misplaced screw group was significantly smaller (p < 0.05) than that of the ideally-placed screws, e.g., 20 % for minor medial, 22 % for minor lateral, and 37 % for severe lateral misplacements. These findings indicated that even clinically-acceptable screw misplacements (up to 4 mm) could significantly reduce the pull-out strengths of pedicle screws thus imposing higher risk of postoperative screw loosening. To avoid these common screw misplacements, the use of advanced approaches for pedicle screw placements appears to be imperative.

Delayed neurological deficit due to a medially misplaced thoracic pedicle screw during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction: a complication 6 years in the making.

PURPOSE: Neurological deficits developing years after pedicle screw misplacement is a rare phenomenon. Here, we report level IV evidence of a previously asymptomatic medial thoracic pedicle screw resulting in paraparesis after a motor vehicle accident. METHODS: A 21-year-old male presented with acute onset of paraparesis following a motor vehicle collision. Six years prior this incident, the patient underwent a thoracolumbar fusion T4-L4 for AIS performed by an outside orthopedic surgeon. CT scan and CT myelogram illustrated decreased spinal canal diameter and cord compression from a medial T8 pedicle screw. RESULTS: Surgical removal of the misplaced pedicle screw resulted in a gradual complete recovery sustained over a period of 2 years. This case is compared to those reported in the literature review between 1981 and 2019 concerning delayed neurological deterioration related to misplaced pedicle screw. CONCLUSION: This case reports a delayed neurological deficit implicating a misplaced pedicle screw. This phenomenon remains rare since 5 cases were reported in the literature over the last 4 decades. It calls into focus the need for confirmation of safe instrumentation during the intraoperative period. It also illustrates the potential difficult decision-making in regard to asymptomatic misplaced instrumentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Comparison of the short-term efficacy of MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF for the treatment of two-segment lumbar degenerative disease.

BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively compared short-term clinical outcomes and complications of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion(Endo-LIF))for two-segmental lumbar degenerative disease, aiming to guide spine surgeons in selecting surgical approaches. METHODS: From January 2019 to December 2023, 30 patients were enrolled,15 in the MIS-TLIF group and 15 in the Endo-LIF group. All patients were followed up for more than 3 months after surgery and the following information was recorded: (1)surgery time, difference in hemoglobin between preoperative and postoperative, surgical costs, first time out of bed after operation, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative complication; (2) ODI score (The Oswestry Disability Index), leg and back VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale), and lumbar vertebra JOA score (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores); (3) MacNab score at final follow-up to assess clinical outcome, CT to evaluate lumbar fusion. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the two groups regarding operation time and cost, with the MIS-TLIF group performing significantly better. Intraoperative bleeding was considerably less in the Endo-LIF group compared to the MIS-TLIF group. However, there were no significant differences in the time of the first postoperative ambulation, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in preoperative VAS, ODI, and JOA between the two surgical groups There were no significant differences in VAS(leg), ODI, and JOA scores between the two groups before and at 1 day,7 days, 1 month, 3 months and final follow-up. However, at 1 day postoperatively, the VAS( back)score in the Endo-LIF group was lower than that in the MIS-TLIF group, and the difference was statistically significant. At the final follow-up, all patients achieved grade III and above according to the Bridwell criteria, and there was no significant difference between the two surgical groups compared to each other. According to the MacNab score at the final follow-up, the excellent rate was 80.00% in the Endo-LIF group and 73.33% in the MIS-TLIF group, with no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy and safety between Endo-LIF and MIS-TLIF for two-segment degenerative lumbar diseases. MIS-TLIF has a shorter operative time and lower costs, while Endo-LIF causes less tissue damage, blood loss, and early postoperative pain, aiding long-term recovery. Both MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF are promising for treating two-segment lumbar degenerative disease. The choice of a surgical procedure depends on the patient's financial situation, their ability to tolerate surgery, and the surgeon's expertise.

Early postoperative efficacy of a fully automated orthopedic robotic system-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis.

To assess the feasibility of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation assisted by a fully automated orthopedic robotic system for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis and evaluate its early postoperative outcome. Totally 20 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical procedure by the same medical group from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 10 patients in the robot-assisted group (RA group) and the other 10 patients in the conventional free-hand technique group (FH group). Accuracy of screw insertion was determined using the Gertzbein-Robbins Scale. The accuracy of the novel robotic system was evaluated by comparing the screw position in the preoperative planning and measuring the entry point deviation distance and the trajectory rotation. The differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, radiographic fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopic dosage, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. The lumbar visual analog scale scores before and 7 days after operation were analyzed to evaluate the improvement of low back pain as the early postoperative outcome. A total of 84 pedicle screws were placed. In the RA group, 97.5% of screws were Grade A, and 2.5% were Grade B. In the FH group, 88.6% of screws were Grade A, 9.1% were Grade B, and 2.3% were Grade C. No statistical difference was found in the operation time between two groups. The RA group showed a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss, radiographic fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopic dosage, and length of hospital stay compared to the FH group. The low back pain in both groups was significantly improved after the operation. The novel orthopedic robotic system-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, with accurate intraoperative screw placement, less surgical damage, less fluoroscopy and shorter length of hospital stay, can be safe and effective for the surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine - A case report.

Background: Few studies discuss the complication of pulmonary cement embolism (PCE) due to cement augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) of the thoracolumbar spine. Case Description: A 62 female with a history of multiple myeloma and Sjogren's syndrome on chronic steroids developed an osteoporotic L1 compression fracture and underwent posterior stabilization with a T10-L4 CAPSI. However, postoperatively, the patient developed a surgical site infection and a PCE, resulting in severe respiratory compromise and death 1 month later. Conclusion: When performing a T10-L4 thoracolumbar CAPSI (i.e., augmented pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine) to address an L1 osteoporotic compression fracture, a 62 year old patient developed a life ending multi organ deficiency due to sepsis together with a PCE.

Case report of minimally invasive spinal endoscopic debridement and pedicle screw fixation for severe spinal infection of the lumbosacral spine.

Background: Surgical treatment of spinal infections, refractory to medical treatments, is increasing in incidence. Here, we present a unique case of discitis secondary to an iatrogenic cause, spinal steroid injection, that resulted in acute neurology, ventral phlegmon, and osteomyelitis requiring multiple surgical interventions for treatment. Case Description: With the adoption of minimally invasive spinal surgery, the patient underwent full endoscopic debridement and decompression at our hospital. The endoscopic technique offers a unique avenue to the anatomically difficult ventral phlegmon for surgical excision, cultures, and pathogen identification. The endoscopic debridement was paired with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation to stabilize the spine from the worsening bone destruction. Outcome: The patient recovered well postoperatively, with the resolution of her neurological symptoms and improved mobility. Conclusions: Full endoscopic spinal debridement and decompression is a powerful tool to manage severe spinal discitis and preliminary studies encourage its adoption in surgical practices.

Tips and tricks for using cement augmentation of pedicle screws and vertebral body replacements - a literature review supported by two case reports. / Consejos y trucos para el uso de cemento óseo en tornillos pediculares y reemplazos de cuerpos vertebrales: una revisión de la literatura respaldada por dos informes de casos.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of osteoporosis is escalating alongside an aging global population, increasing the demand for spinal surgeries, including those necessitating cement augmentation for enhanced construct stability. OBJECTIVE: This article delves into the nuanced application of cement augmentation techniques for pedicle screws and vertebral body replacements (VBR), aimed at optimizing surgical outcomes in osteoporotic spines. METHOD: Drawing from a comprehensive literature review according to important clinical and biomechanical studies and the authors' clinical experiences, we elucidate strategies to mitigate complications and improve surgical efficacy. RESULTS: Cement augmentation has shown promise in managing vertebral fractures and in securing pedicle screws within osteoporotic vertebrae, with the advent of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement marking a pivotal advancement in spinal surgery. We highlight intraoperative measures like the choice between pre-injecting cement and utilizing cannulated or fenestrated screws, emphasizing the importance of controlling cement viscosity to prevent leakage and embolism. Through two case reports, we demonstrate the practical application of endplate cementation following VBR. CONCLUSION: While the use of cement augmentation poses certain risks, its judicious application-supported by evidence-based guidelines and surgical expertise-can substantially enhance the stability of spinal constructs in osteoporotic patients. This allows a reduction in instrumentation length by enhancing biomechanical stability concerning pullout, bending, and rotational forces. Furthermore, the incidence of endplate sintering following VBF can be significantly reduced. Future research, particularly on antibiotic-loaded PMMA, may further expand its utility and optimize its safety profile.

High Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Navigated Kirschner-Wire-Less Single-Step Pedicle Screw System (SSPSS) in Lumbar Fusions: Comparison of Intraoperatively Planned versus Final Screw Position.

(1) Background: Our team has previously introduced the Single-Step Pedicle Screw System (SSPSS), which eliminates the need for K-wires, as a safe and effective method for percutaneous minimally invasive spine (MIS) pedicle screw placement. Despite this, there are ongoing concerns about the reliability and accuracy of screw placement in MIS procedures without traditional tools like K-wires and Jamshidi needles. To address these concerns, we evaluated the accuracy of the SSPSS workflow by comparing the planned intraoperative screw trajectories with the final screw positions. Traditionally, screw placement accuracy has been assessed by grading the final screw position using postoperative CT scans. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion, using intraoperative 3D navigation for screw placement. The planned screw trajectories were saved in the navigation system during each procedure, and postoperative CT scans were used to evaluate the implanted screws. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the Gertzbein and Robbins classification scores of the planned trajectories and the final screw positions. Accuracy was defined as a final screw position matching the classification of the planned trajectory. (3) Results: Out of 206 screws, 196 (95%) were accurately placed, with no recorded complications. (4) Conclusions: The SSPSS workflow, even without K-wires and other traditional instruments, facilitates accurate and reliable pedicle screw placement.

Augmenting Reality in Spinal Surgery: A Narrative Review of Augmented Reality Applications in Pedicle Screw Instrumentation.

Background and Objectives: The advent of augmented reality (AR) in spinal surgery represents a key technological evolution, enhancing precision and safety in procedures such as pedicle screw instrumentation. This review assesses the current applications, benefits, and challenges of AR technology in spinal surgery, focusing on its effects on surgical accuracy and patient outcomes. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature published between January 2023 and December 2024 was conducted, focusing on AR and navigational technologies in spinal surgery. Key outcomes such as accuracy, efficiency, and complications were emphasized. Results: Thirteen studies were included, highlighting substantial improvements in surgical accuracy, efficiency, and safety with AR and navigational systems. AR technology was found to significantly reduce the learning curve for spinal surgeons, improve procedural efficiency, and potentially reduce surgical complications. The challenges identified include high system costs, the complexity of training requirements, the integration with existing workflows, and limited clinical evidence. Conclusions: AR technology holds promise for advancements in spinal surgery, particularly in improving the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw instrumentation. Despite existing challenges such as cost, training needs, and regulatory hurdles, AR has the potential to transform spinal surgical practices. Ongoing research, technological refinements, and the development of implementation strategies are essential to fully leverage AR's capabilities in enhancing patient care.

Evaluating the Status and Promising Potential of Robotic Spinal Surgery Systems.

The increasing frequency of cervical and lumbar spine disorders, driven by aging and evolving lifestyles, has led to a rise in spinal surgeries using pedicle screws. Robotic spinal surgery systems have emerged as a promising innovation, offering enhanced accuracy in screw placement and improved surgical outcomes. We focused on literature of this field from the past 5 years, and a comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Robotic spinal surgery systems have significantly impacted spinal procedures by improving pedicle screw placement accuracy and supporting various techniques. These systems facilitate personalized, minimally invasive, and low-radiation interventions, leading to greater precision, reduced patient risk, and decreased radiation exposure. Despite advantages, challenges such as high costs and a steep learning curve remain. Ongoing advancements are expected to further enhance these systems' role in spinal surgery.