Immediate management of a stable patient with unstable pelvis.

The diagnosis of a traumatic unstable pelvis in a stable patient is a temporary concept depending on when we see the patient, as all patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock have hemodynamic stability until they become unstable. As a rule, the more unstable the pelvic fracture is, the higher the risk of bleeding and hemodynamic instability it has. Therefore, in unstable pelvic fractures, hemodynamic stability should be a diagnosis by exclusion. For bleeding detection in stable patients, an immediate one-stage contrast-enhanced CT scan is the appropriate diagnosis test; however, since CT scan radiation is always an issue, X-rays should be considered in those cases of hemodynamically stable patients in whom there is a reasonable suspicion that no unsafe bleeding is going on. Pelvic fracture classification is essential as usually there is an association between the injury mechanism, the fracture displacement, and the hemodynamic stability. Anteroposterior and, particularly, vertical traumatisms have much more proclivity to provoke major pelvic displacement and bleeding. The use of a pelvic binder, as early as possible including pre-hospital management, should be standard in high-impact blunt trauma patients independently of the trauma mechanisms. External fixation is the preferred method of stabilization in case of open fractures, and, in closed ones, when the schedule for definite osteosynthesis prolongs because of the patient's general condition. If possible, immediate percutaneous sacroiliac screw insertion for unstable pelvic fractures produce excellent results even in open fractures.

Comparison of T-POD and SAM Pelvic Sling II and the influence of attachment level in the initial management of unstable pelvic type C injuries - a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Type C pelvic fractures (AO/OTA) are severe injuries that frequently lead to bleeding and hemodynamic instability. Pelvic binders play a crucial role in their initial management. Placement at the correct level in the prehospital setting is challenging. The aim of this study was to compare two pelvic binders regarding their effectiveness in reducing intrapelvic volume and increasing intrapelvic pressure in patients with type C pelvic fractures (AO/OTA) when applied at three different levels. METHODS: Rotationally and vertically unstable pelvic injuries (AO/OTA classification 61-C1.1) were produced in five fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens. Intrapelvic volume, vesical pressure and compression pressure within the pubic symphysis and the sacroiliac joint were measured when applying a SAM Pelvic Sling II and a T-POD at the level of the greater trochanter as well as levels higher and lower than recommended. RESULTS: Comparison of the two pelvic binders positioned at the recommended level (greater trochanter) showed no significant difference in volume reduction (13.85 ± 31.37 cm3, p = 0.442), however, increase in vesical pressure was significantly higher when using the T-POD (5.80 ± 3.27 cmH2O, p = 0.017). When positioned at the level of the iliac crest, vesical pressure increase and intrapelvic volume reduction were significantly greater with the T-POD (14.00 ± 8.57 cmH2O, p = 0.022 and 10.45 ± 5.45 cm3, p = 0.031 respectively). Application of the SAM Pelvic Sling II below the greater trochanter led to a significantly greater decrease in volume (-32.26 ± 7.52 cm3, p = 0.003) than the T-POD. Comparison of the recommended attachment level with incorrect positioning led to no significant differences for the T-POD, while the SAM Pelvic Sling II achieved a significantly lower volume reduction when placed at the iliac crest (40.15 ± 14.57 cm3, p = 0.012) and a significantly lower increase in vesical pressure when applied below the greater trochanter (3.40 ± 1.52 cmH2O, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Direct comparison of the two pelvic binders showed that the T-POD achieved significantly greater results when applied at the recommended level and was less susceptible to incorrect positioning. These outcomes support the preferred use of the T-POD for prehospital emergency pelvic stabilisation.

Does a prehospital applied pelvic binder improve patient survival?

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic fractures are serious and oftentimes require immediate medical attention. Pelvic binders have become a critical tool in the management of pelvic injuries, especially in the prehospital setting. Proper application of the pelvic binder is essential to achieve the desired result. This study evaluates the effectiveness of prehospitally applied pelvic binders in improving outcomes for patients with pelvic fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 66 patients with unstable pelvic ring fracture classified as AO61B or 61C, who were treated at a Level I hospital in the emergency room between January 2014 and December 2018. The ideal position for a pelvic binder was determined, and patients were divided into three sub-groups based on whether they received a pelvic binder in the ideal position, outside the optimal range, or not at all. The primary outcome measure was the survival rate of the patients. RESULTS: 66 trauma patients with unstable pelvic fractures were enrolled, with a mean age of 53.8 years, who presented to our ER between 2014 and 2018. The mean ISS score was 21.9, with 60.3 % of patients having a moderate to severe injury (ISS > 16 points). Pelvic binder usage did not differ significantly between patients with an ISS < or ≥ 16 points. A total of 9 patients (13.6 %) died during hospitalization, with a mean survival time of 8.1 days. The survival rate did not differ significantly between patients with or without a pelvic binder, or between those with an ideally placed pelvic binder versus those with a binder outside the ideal range. The ISS score, heart rate, blood pressure at admission, and hemoglobin level were significantly different between the group of patients who died and those who survived, indicating their importance in predicting outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study found that prehospital pelvic binders did not significantly impact patient outcomes for unstable pelvic fractures, with injury severity score (ISS) being the strongest predictor of survival. Assessing injury severity and managing blood loss remain crucial for these patients. While pelvic binders may not impact survival significantly, they still play a role in stabilizing pelvic fractures and managing blood loss.

Imposter or knight in shining armor? Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) for severe pelvic injuries in patients with multiple trauma: a trauma-registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCD) are standard in hemorrhage-control of unstable pelvic ring fractures (UPF). Controversial data on their usefulness exists. Aim of the study was to investigate whether prehospital application of PCCD can reduce mortality and transfusion requirements in UPF. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. From 2016 until 2021, 63,371 adult severely injured patients were included into TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society (TR-DGU). We analyzed PCCD use over time and compared patients with multiple trauma patients and UPF, who received prehospital PCCD to those who did not (noPCCD). Groups were adjusted for risk of prehospital PCCD application by propensity score matching. Primary endpoints were hospital mortality, standardized mortality rate (SMR) and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: Overall UPF incidence was 9% (N = 5880) and PCCD use increased over time (7.5% to 20.4%). Of all cases with UPF, 40.2% received PCCD and of all cases with PCCD application, 61% had no pelvic injury at all. PCCD patients were more severely injured and had higher rates of shock or transfusion. 24-h.-mortality and hospital mortality were higher with PCCD (10.9% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.033; 17.9% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.070). Hospital mortality with PCCD was 1% lower than predicted. SMR was in favor of PCCD but failed statistical significance (0.95 vs. 1.04, p = 0.101). 1,860 propensity score matched pairs were analyzed: NoPCCD-patients received more often catecholamines (19.6% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.043) but required less surgical pelvic stabilization in the emergency room (28.6% vs. 36.8%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality or transfusion requirements. CONCLUSION: We observed PCCD overuse in general and underuse in UPF. Prehospital PCCD appears to be more a marker of injury severity and less triggered by presence of UPF. We found no salutary effect on survival or transfusion requirements. Inappropriate indication and technical flaw may have biased our results. TR-DGU does not contain data on these aspects. Further studies are necessary. Modular add-on questioners to the registry could offer one possible solution to overcome this limitation. We are concerned that PCCD use may be unfairly discredited by misinterpretation of the available evidence and strongly vote for a prospective trial.

From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching.

BACKGROUND: This experimental study was performed to evaluate the role of blended learning for technical skill teaching on the European Trauma Course (ETC). While online modules are extensively used for theoretical teaching, their role in skills training remains less well explored. The ETC currently relies on the established 4-step technique for teaching technical skills. However, the required large cohort of skilled instructors and the time intensity prove increasingly challenging in a current climate of staff shortages and funding constraints. This study assesses if blended learning, combining pre-course online elements with face-to-face training matches the effectiveness of the traditional 4-step approach whilst being more time-efficient. METHODS: In a randomised, multi-centre trial, the conventional face-to-face 4-step technique for teaching a skill of medium complexity, the application of a pelvic binder, was compared with an innovative blended approach. It was hypothesised that the blended approach was non-inferior for skill performance measured after the teaching session and after two days (skill retention) with the time needed for teaching and student/teacher satisfaction as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety participants, divided into 44 traditional and 46 blended method students, were analysed. Independent-samples t-test showed no significant difference in performance scores and non-inferiority of the blended approach with a half of one standard deviation margin. A statistically significant difference in mean retention scores favored the blended approach. A Mann-Whitney U Test revealed no significant difference in candidate satisfaction levels but a statistically significant difference in instructors' satisfaction levels in favour of the blended approach. Analysis with Welch' t-test demonstrated that the face-to-face teaching time needed for the blended approach was significantly shorter (by 6 min). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of a blended approach with the 4-step technique for teaching pelvic binder application in the ETC streamlined teaching without compromising skill acquisition quality. This innovative approach addresses traditional limitations and shows promise in adapting medical education to modern learning and teaching demands. We suggest that blended learning could also be applied for other skills taught on life support courses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University of Dundee (Schools of Medicine and Life sciences Research Ethics Committee, REC number 22/59, 28th June 2022).

The EMS stress view: occult pelvic instability revealed by pre-hospital pelvic binder placement.

PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate the serendipitous pelvic binder stress radiographs of lateral compression type (LC) pelvic ring injuries. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series performed at a single, level I academic trauma center from 2016 to 2018. All patients presenting with a minimally displaced LC pelvic ring injury were reviewed (< 10 cm displacement on static pelvic radiographs). Patients with X-rays (XR) in a pelvic binder (EMS stress) and with the pelvic binder removed were included. Pelvic ring stability was determined by attending surgeon evaluation of EMS stress radiographs versus static XR of the pelvis. Patients were treated non-operatively and allowed to weight bear or taken to the operating room for exam under anesthesia (EUA) and potential operative fixation. Clinical success of treatment was determined by evaluation of further displacement at the completion of their most recent follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients of the initial 398 reviewed met inclusion criteria. Fourteen of 37 patients (38%) were categorized as stable with no significant pelvis displacement seen on EMS stress and were treated non-operatively without further sequelae (4.6 months mean follow-up). The remaining 23/37 (62%) were treated operatively. Occult instability was identified on EMS stress in 14 (61%) of those 23 patients and the remainder were determined to be unstable based upon fracture pattern or EUA. All patients went on to successful treatment without significant pelvic deformity (7.8 months mean follow-up). CONCLUSION: The EMS stress XR is a valuable, opportunistic evaluation in LC pelvic ring injuries. This evaluation is a useful diagnostic adjunct to alert the provider that additional stress imaging may be indicated to evaluate for occult pelvic ring instability.

Rescue Blankets as Multifunctional Rescue Equipment in Alpine and Wilderness Emergencies-A Narrative Review and Clinical Implications.

The utilization of rescue blankets in pre-hospital emergency medicine exceeds protection from hypothermia and enhanced visibility by far. In this narrative review, we focus on emphasizing the alternative applications of these fascinating multifunctional tools in the pre-hospital setting. A literature search in PubMed® and Web of ScienceTM yielded 100 results (last update was on 8 July 2022), a total number of 26 of which were included in this narrative review. Nine articles assessing alternative functions of rescue blanket were further evaluated and described in more detail. In addition, we performed various experimental and observational trials to test the functionality of rescue practice in mountain emergency medicine. Newly fabricated rescue blankets proved to possess impressive robustness. We evaluated rescue blankets in their applicability to not only protect from hypothermia, but also as practical tools to treat catastrophic hemorrhage and bleeding limbs, to perform open pneumothorax chest seals in sucking chest wounds, to prevent damage to unprotected eyes on the glacier and as alternative instruments for transportation in the inaccessible areas. Rescue blankets are important rescue equipment in alpine and wilderness emergencies with multifunctional applications, and must be part of every personal medical kit.

Does the accuracy of prehospital pelvic binder placement affect cardiovascular physiological parameters during rescue? A clinical study in patients with pelvic ring injuries.

Introduction: Pelvic binders (PB) have become an established first-line treatment for on scene use in suspected pelvic ring injuries. A sustained incidence of incorrect placements was reported, usually above the trochanteric region. We examined if malplacement is associated with worse clinical parameters related to resuscitation. Methods: Retrospective chart review, level 1 center over a 3-year period. Inclusion criteria: adult patients (18-69y/o), high-energy injury, presence of a pelvic binder on admission - patients without binders served as controls. Exclusions: geriatric patients (>70y/o), ground level falls. Malplacement of the binder was assessed and graded (grade 1:<5 cm above trochanter, grade 2:5-10 cm, grade 3 > 10 cm) from the initial computed tomography scan (3D reconstruction). Results: Seventy-six patients were included. Males (72%), mean age 47years (range 18-91, SD 19.4). Mean Injury Severity Score was 22.3 points (range 1 -48, SD 10.4) and mean Glasgow Coma Score on arrival was 10.8 points (range 3-15, SD 5.3). Fifty-three percent presented with a pelvic ring injury (74% of them with a type B or C fracture). Mean PB distance from the trochanteric region was 56 mm (range 41-247 mm, SD 54.5). Fifty percent of PBs were moderately displaced, 21% showed severe misplacement (>100 mm). Physiological parameters were unchanged regardless of the accuracy of PB placement. Conclusion: Incorrect placement of pelvic binders persists despite widespread implementation of the device. In our series, displacement was always cranially and had no effect on preclinical fluids received or parameters of resuscitation on arrival. Level of Evidence: III.

Commonly performed pelvic binder modifications for femoral access may hinder binder efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures are common and potentially life-threatening. Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) can temporize hemorrhage, but more invasive strategies that involve femoral access may be necessary for definitive treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of PCCDs reducing open book pelvic fractures when utilizing commonly described modifications and placement adjustments that allow for access to the femoral vasculature. METHODS: Open book pelvic fractures were created in adult cadavers. Three commercially available PCCDs were used to reduce fractures. The binders were properly placed, moved caudally, or moved cranially and modified. Fracture reduction rates were then recorded. RESULTS: The pelvic fracture was completely reduced with every PCCD tested when properly placed. Reduction rates decreased with improper placement and modifications. CONCLUSION: Modifying PCCD placement to allow femoral access decreased the effectiveness of these devices Clinicians should be aware of this possibility when caring for critically injured trauma patients with pelvic fractures.

Rescue blankets as multifunctional rescue equipment in alpine and wilderness emergencies: a commentary.

Emergency applications of rescue blankets go far beyond protection from hypothermia. In this review alternative applicabilities of these remarkable multifunctional tools were highlighted. Newly fabricated rescue blankets prove impressive robustness. The high tensile strength along with its low weight enable further applications, e.g. immobilization of injured extremities, splinting, wound dressing, a makeshift chest seal in sucking chest wounds, amongst others. Furthermore, the foil can be used as a vapour barrier, as eye protection and it can even be used to construct a stopgap bivouac sack, as alternative tool for transportation in the remote area and a wind shield or a water reservoir in the wilderness. During search-and-rescue missions the light reflection from the gold surface enhances visibility and increases the chance to be found. Rescue blankets are essential parts of first aid kits and backpacks in alpine and wilderness environment with multifunctional applicabilities. In this commentary to a review we want to evaluate the numerous applicabilities of rescue blankets in the treatment of emergencies by wilderness medicine and pre-hospital EMS.

Benefits of early application of pelvic circumferential compression device to reduce bleeding in pelvic fractures.

BACKGROUND: To study of efficacy of early pelvic circumferential compression device using in patients with suspected pelvic trauma, compared with conventional stepwise approach. METHODS: Traumatic injury and at least one of the following criteria are required for inclusion: loss of consciousness or a Glasgow coma score (GCS) of less than 13; systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg; falling from more than 6 m; injury to several important organs; and a positive pelvic compression test. Patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria for the experimental group were given an early application of a commercial pelvic sling beginning in July 2019. The control group consisted of cases who got the device after clinical or radiological confirmation of a pelvic fracture in the previous year. Gender, age, mechanism of injury, GCS, hospital stay, amount of packed red blood cell transfusion, hematocrit in emergency room, and hematocrit 24 h after application of pelvic binder were all assessed and compared. RESULTS: The study had a total of 30 participants, with 15 in each group. The number of packed red blood cell transfusions in the early pelvic binder group (0.80 ± 1.42) is considerably lower than in the control group (2.4 ± 2.32) (P = 0.008), although the hematocrit change is not statistically different between the groups (2.1 VS 0.7) (P = 0.191). The time it took to install a pelvic binder was considerably shorter in the early pelvic binder group (16.40 ± 5.45) than in the control group (40.40 ± 13.64) (P = 0.001). There were no problems associated to soft tissue and skin necrosis in either group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the PCCD for 24 h prior to clinical and radiographic confirmation has significantly reduced the rate of packed red blood cell transfusion in any pelvic fracture patient without device-related complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was entered into the Thai Clinical Trials Registry ( TCTR20210809007 ).

Extraperitoneal pelvic packing in trauma a review.

Pelvic fractures are life-threatening injuries with mortality as high as 40%. The major cause of death is pelvic exsanguination. Extraperitoneal pelvic packing has been suggested in recent years to be an effective method for hemorrhage control. This article briefly reviews the various aspects related to this procedure with emphasis on history, outcomes, technique and complications.

How effective are different models of pelvic binders: results of a study using a Pelvic Emergency Simulator.

BACKGROUND: The application of pelvic binders in the preclinical and early clinical phase is advisable to avoid or treat C-problems in unstable and potential bleeding pelvic ring fractures, even if the clinical effectivity is not completely proved. The use for pathologies in the posterior pelvic ring is still debatable. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined if there is a difference in achievable compression in the dorsal pelvic ring depending on position and pelvic binder model. Can this effect be tested with a simplified artificial model? METHODS: We simulated a Tile type C fracture within the established pelvic emergency trainer and measured in a test series the effectivity of reduction with a non-invasive stabilization technique using 3 different pelvic binders. RESULTS: Any therapeutic effect of a pelvic binder with compression to the posterior pelvic ring requires at first a reduction maneuver. While the compression effect in the symphysis depends only on positioning of the binder, in the posterior pelvic ring, the result varies with the used model. The achievable pressure in the SI joint with a pelvic binder is only 20-25% (33.5-47 N) compared to the C-Clamp values (156 N). CONCLUSIONS: The use of pelvic binders for non-invasive pelvic ring stabilization, even with a posterior pathology, could be proven in a simplified fracture model. A proper fracture reduction and an adequate device positioning influence the effectiveness. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of an emergency pelvic trainer even for a non-invasive maneuver is advisable.

In a simulated adult trauma patient, can pelvic binders be applied accurately by paramedics and HEMS paramedics? A pilot observational study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital treatment of suspected haemorrhagic pelvic fractures includes application of a purpose-made pelvic binder. Recent hospital studies identified poor accuracy of pelvic binder application, but there is little pre-hospital research to date. METHODS: A pilot observational study was conducted in an NHS ambulance service to examine the accuracy of landmark identification and pelvic binder application. Paramedics and Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) paramedics were recruited via an internal advert. Participants were asked to name and identify the landmarks (greater trochanters) on a simulated patient and apply the Prometheus pelvic splint. Participants read two clinical scenarios and indicated if they would apply a pelvic binder. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in the analysis of results to compare performance between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-six paramedics were recruited. A total of 92.3% (n = 12) paramedics and 100% (n = 13) HEMS paramedics verbalised the correct landmarks. A total of 23.1% (n = 3) paramedics and 61.5% (n = 8) HEMS paramedics identified the correct landmarks on both sides of the pelvis. A total of 15.4% (n = 2) paramedics and 61.5% (n = 8) HEMS paramedics applied the pelvic binder centrally over both greater trochanters. Clinical decision-making to apply a pelvic binder was largely in accordance with a local standard operating procedure. CONCLUSION: This study supports existing research highlighting cases of inaccurate pelvic binder placement. HEMS paramedics were more accurate than paramedics, but only 39% of all binders placed in the study were applied correctly. Frequent exposure to major trauma and familiarity with pelvic binders may have resulted in greater accuracy among HEMS paramedics. Further education and training around clinical assessment of the pelvis may improve the accuracy of pelvic binder application by all paramedics. This would subsequently improve the quality of patient care and ensure adequate haemorrhage control is maintained.

Pilot randomized trial of pre-hospital advanced therapies for the control of hemorrhage (PATCH) using pelvic binders.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures represent a small percent of all skeletal injuries but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality secondary to hemodynamic instability from bleeding bone surfaces and disrupted pelvic vasculature. Stabilization of the pelvis prior to arrival at a treatment facility may mitigate the hemodynamic consequences of pelvic ring injuries and improve morbidity and mortality. Whether pelvic compression devices such as pelvic binders or sheets can be safely applied in the prehospital setting has not been well-studied. This study aims to evaluate the safety of applying a pelvic binder to at-risk patients in the field after scalable training and the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial evaluating this practice in the prehospital setting. METHODS: A pilot study (prospective randomized trial design) was conducted in the pre-hospital environment in an urban area surrounding a level-one trauma center. Pre-hospital emergency medical (EMS) personnel were trained to identify patients at high-risk for pelvic fracture and properly apply a commercial pelvic binder. Adult patients with a high-energy mechanism, suspected pelvic fracture, and "Priority 1" criteria were prospectively identified by paramedics and randomized to pelvic binder placement or usual care. Medical records were reviewed for safety outcomes. Secondary outcomes were parameters of efficacy including interventions needed to control hemorrhage (such as angioembolization and surgical control of bleeding) and mortality. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were randomized to treatment (binder: N=20; nonbinder: N=23). No complications of binder placement were identified. Eight patients (40%) had binders placed correctly at the level of the greater trochanter. Two binders (10%) were placed too proximally and 10 (50%) binders were not visualized on x-ray. Two binder group patients and three nonbinder group patients required angioembolization. None required surgical control of pelvic bleeding. Two nonbinder group patients and one binder group patient were readmitted within 30 days and one nonbinder group patient died within 30 days. CONCLUSION: Identification of pelvic fractures in the field remains a challenge. However, a scalable training model for appropriate binder placement was successful without secondary injury to patients. The model for conducting prospective, randomized trials in the prehospital setting was successful.

Pelvic Binder Utilization in Combat Casualties: Does It Matter?

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of pelvic binders, the proper placement of binders, and to determine any differences in blood product transfusions between combat casualties with and without a pelvic binder identified on initial imaging immediately after the injury. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all combat-injured patients who arrived at our military treatment hospital between 2010 and 2012 with a documented pelvic fracture. Initial imaging (X-ray or computed tomography) immediately after injury were evaluated by 2 independent radiologists. Young-Burgess (YB) classification, pelvic diastasis, correct binder placement over the greater trochanters, and the presence of a pelvic external fixator (ex-fix) was recorded. Injury severity score (ISS), whole blood, and blood component therapy administered within the first 24-hours after injury were compared between casualties with and without a pelvic binder. RESULTS: 39 casualties had overseas imaging to confirm and radiographically classify a YB pelvic ring injury. The most common fracture patterns were anteroposterior (53%) and lateral compression (28%). 49% (19/39) did not have a binder or ex-fix identified on initial imaging or in any documentation after injury. Ten patients had a binder, with 30% positioned incorrectly over the iliac crest. ISS (34 ± 1.6) was not statistically different between the binder and the no-binder group. Pubic symphysis diastasis was significantly lower in the binder group (1.4 ± 0.2 vs 3.7 ± 0.5, P < .001). There was a trend toward decreased 24-hour total blood products between the binder and no-binder groups (75 ± 11 vs 82 ± 13, P = .67). This was due to less cryoprecipitate in the binder group (6 ± 2 vs 19 ± 5, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic binder placement in combat trauma may be inconsistent and an important area for continued training. While 24-hour total transfusions do not appear to be different, no-binder patients received significantly more cryoprecipitate.

High Tensile Strength Increases Multifunctional Use of Survival Blankets in Wilderness Emergencies.

INTRODUCTION: Metallic survival blankets are multifunctional medical devices frequently used to provide thermal insulation in sport and leisure activities and in emergency care. To assess further properties of survival blankets, we investigated their breaking strength under laboratory conditions. METHODS: An experimental study was performed with 2 commercially available survival blankets used by emergency medical services. Breaking strength measured with a tensile testing machine was determined consecutively with 10 tests conducted per brand. RESULTS: Breaking strength (mean±SD) of the tested brands was 3.8±0.4 kN, (range: 2.8-4.1 kN) and 4.0±0.5 kN (range: 3.2-4.6 kN). When using the windlass of a commercially available tourniquet for the longitudinally folded survival blanket, the windlass bent at a force of 0.8 kN; when using a carabiner, the force exceeded 3.6 kN before failure occurred in both blanket brands. CONCLUSIONS: Both brands of survival blankets show impressive tensile strength, indicating that they have the potential to serve as temporary pelvic binders or even as makeshift tourniquets when urgent bleeding control is needed.

Potentially serious adverse effects from application of a circumferential compression device for pelvic fracture: A report of three cases.

Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCDs) have gained wide acceptance in the management of patients with pelvic fracture. These devices are considered safe due to their noninvasive nature and significant hazards associated with the use of PCCDs have not been reported previously. However, we present herein the cases of three patients who received PCCD application and eventually developed major complications presumably caused by PCCDs. As a result, one patient developed surgical site infection following internal fixation and required several debridements. Another patient ended up with a walking disability. The remaining patient eventually died from exsanguination following application of the PCCD. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for deleterious effects, including bladder rupture, muscle necrosis, and vessel injuries. In particular, application for acetabular fractures and prolonged application of PCCDs should be avoided.

Identifying risk factors for suboptimal pelvic binder placement in major trauma.

AIMS: This study aimed to identify the frequency of sub-optimal pelvic binder placement at a tertiary-level trauma centre, produce a reproducible, quantitative measure of pelvic binder fit, and identify risk factors for sub-optimal placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all consecutive patients who had a pelvic binder in place on arrival to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital in Queensland, Australia from 2012-2016. The X-Rays were reviewed by two senior clinicians for position and measured for degree of displacement if not optimally placed between the greater and lesser trochanters. Risk factors for sub-optimal position of the binder were assessed using multiple logistic regression with inclusion of all variables that had a statistical association (to p<0.05) at the univariate analysis stage. Secondary assessment was conducted of patients who had undergone CT imaging for subcutaneous body fat distribution. RESULTS: In total, 496 X-Rays were assessed for pelvic binder fit, finding 43.5% sub-optimally placed. 39.7% binders were superior to the greater trochanter line and 3.8% inferiorly placed below the lesser trochanter line. The majority of the sub-optimally placed binders were within 60 mm of the ideal position. Female patients had a greater risk of sub-optimal binder placement compared to males (62.5% vs 37%). Increasing intertrochanteric height was found to be protective for ideal binder placement with an aOR 0.62 for each cm in increased height. There was no association with sub-optimal placement and age, sex, mechanism of trauma, injury severity score, number of body regions injured or Glasgow Coma Scale. There was strong kappa agreement between the X-Ray assessors for binder position assessment on the plain radiological imaging. CONCLUSION: Sub-optimal positioning of pelvic binders is common in our trauma population. This study has described the risk factors associated with higher rates of sub-optimal fit and provides a description of rapid radiological assessment for optimal fit for the bedside clinician caring for injured patients in the resuscitation room.

Improving the improvisational pelvic circumferential compression technique for open-book pelvic fractures using a simulation model and a sphygmomanometer.

BACKGROUND: Open-book pelvic fractures are associated with significant mortality. Emergency management may require a commercial pelvic circumferential compression device to reduce the fracture and compress haemorrhaging pelvic vasculature. Standard, commercial, twin-sized bedsheets are acceptable should commercial devices be unavailable. However, obese victims or personnel with insufficient body strength may impede successful reduction. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the value of an improvisational windlass (intravenous pole) in improving the ability to reduce an open-book pelvic fracture. METHODS: The Institutional Review Board-approved study involved 28 diverse healthcare students and emergency medicine residents. Each participant's demographic information and physical characteristics were recorded. A METIman was prepared with knee and ankle binding and a sphygmomanometer set at 40 mm Hg placed over the symphysis pubis. Two-person teams were randomly selected to place a bedsheet at greater trochanter level and atop the sphygmomanometer. The bedsheet was secured with maximum effort by the pairs and the pressure recorded. Following this, the pairs inserted an intravenous pole in the knot and torqued the pole to maximum effort and a repeat pressure recorded. RESULTS: The mean increase in pressure using only the bedsheet was 106.43 mm Hg per team. With bedsheet and intravenous pole, the mean pressure increase was 351.79 mm Hg per team. The difference was statistically significant (independent samples t-test: t = 17.177, p < 0.001, 95% CI (216.65 to 274.07 mm Hg). There was no correlation between pressure increases and the individual physical characteristics of the subjects (r = - 0.183, p = 0.352). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of personnel's physical attributes, the addition of an improvisational windlass to a pelvic circumferential compression bedsheet can improve the ability to reduce an open-book fracture, especially in obese victims.