Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of BP02 (Trastuzumab Biosimilar) Compared to EU- and US-Approved Trastuzumab in Healthy Adult Male Volunteers: A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence between BP02 (a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar) and the reference trastuzumab approved in the EU (EU-trastuzumab) and the US (US-trastuzumab). METHODS: In this phase 1, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 111 healthy male volunteers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single 6-mg/kg intravenous infusion of BP02, EU-trastuzumab, or US-trastuzumab and were evaluated for 78 days. Serum drug concentration-time data were analyzed by non-compartmental methods. The PK similarity of BP02 to the two reference products, and between EU-trastuzumab and US-trastuzumab, was determined using the standard 80-125% bioequivalence criteria. RESULTS: Baseline demographics for the 111 subjects with evaluable pharmacokinetics were similar across all treatment groups. PK profiles were similar for the three products. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from the time of dosing to infinity (AUC0-inf), AUC from the time of dosing until the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and peak serum concentration of trastuzumab (Cmax) were within 80% to 125% for all three pairwise comparisons. Adverse events (AEs) were similar across all arms, with treatment-related AEs reported by 73.0%, 73.0%, and 89.2% of the subjects in the BP02, EU-trastuzumab, and US-trastuzumab groups, respectively. The most common AEs were headache, infusion-related reactions, and upper-respiratory-tract infections. Four subjects-three in the US-trastuzumab group and one in the BP02 group-discontinued the study due to AEs. All post-dose samples except for two tested negative for anti-drug antibodies. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the PK similarity among BP02, EU-trastuzumab, and US-trastuzumab. The safety and immunogenicity profiles observed for the three products in this study are consistent with previous reports for trastuzumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR number: ACTRN12621000573853.

Preclinical evaluation and phase 1 study of the PI3Kα/δ inhibitor TQ-B3525 in Chinese patients with advanced cancers.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors transformed management of various malignancies. This study preclinically characterized TQ-B3525 (dual PI3Kα/δ inhibitor) and assessed the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma or advanced solid tumors (STs). METHODS: Oral TQ-B3525 was given at eight dose levels on a 28-day cycle. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and safety. RESULTS: TQ-B3525 showed high selectivity and suppressed tumor growth. Between June 12, 2018, and November 18, 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (63 in dose-escalation cohort; 17 in dose-expansion cohort). Two DLTs occurred in two (two of 63, 3.2%) DLT-evaluable patients; MTD was not identified. TQ-B3525 at 20 mg once daily was selected as RP2D. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events mainly included hyperglycemia (16.3%), neutrophil count decreased (15.0%), and diarrhea (10.0%). Two (2.5%) treatment-related deaths were reported. Sixty patients with R/R lymphoma and 11 advanced STs demonstrated objective response rates of 68.3% and 9.1%, disease control rates of 91.7% and 54.6%, median progression-free survivals of 12.1 and 1.1 months; median overall survivals were not reached. CONCLUSION: TQ-B3525 exhibited rapid absorption and a nearly proportional increase in exposure. Acceptable safety and promising efficacy support further investigation of TQ-B3525 (20 mg once daily) for R/R lymphoma.

Antitumor activity and safety of the PD-1 inhibitor retifanlimab in patients with recurrent microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair endometrial cancer: Final safety and efficacy results from cohort H of the POD1UM-101 phase I study.

OBJECTIVE: Retifanlimab is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody against programmed death 1 being investigated in several solid tumor types. We report final results from patients with recurrent microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer treated with retifanlimab in a POD1UM-101 expansion cohort. METHODS: Eligible patients (≥18 years; histologically proven/unresectable/recurrent, MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer; checkpoint inhibitor naive) received retifanlimab 500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for ≤2 years. Primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. RESULTS: At data cutoff (May 17, 2023), 76 patients had received at least one retifanlimab dose. Median (range) age was 67 (49-88) years; 88.2% of patients had recurrent metastatic disease and 80.3% had visceral metastases. Seventy-five patients (98.7%) had received at least one prior systemic therapy. Median retifanlimab exposure was 10.0 (0.03-25.9) months; 23 patients completed treatment. 38 patients (50.0%) had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly anemia (n = 10 [13.2%]). 63 patients (82.9%) had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs; grade ≥3, n = 14 [18.4%]); most common was fatigue (n = 14 [18.4%]). Two patients had TEAEs that led to death; no TRAEs were fatal. 39 patients had objective responses (51.3%; 95% CI, 39.6-63.0%); 19 patients (25.0%) had complete response and 20 (26.3%) had partial response. Median progression-free survival was 12.2 months; 30 patients (76.9%) had duration of response (DOR) ≥12 months. Median DOR was not reached after median follow-up time of 26.0 months. CONCLUSIONS: Retifanlimab was generally well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity in patients with pre-treated recurrent MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer.

Once-daily oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lotiglipron (PF-07081532) for type 2 diabetes and obesity: Two randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose Phase 1 studies.

AIM: To investigate the effects of lotiglipron (PF-07081532), a once-daily, oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two Phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose studies were conducted to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lotiglipron. RESULTS: Across the studies, 74 participants with T2D were treated for 28 or 42 days, and 26 participants with obesity without diabetes were treated for 42 days, following randomization to placebo or lotiglipron (target doses 10-180 mg/day, with dose titration to higher target doses). Most adverse events were mild (89.6%), with nausea the most frequently reported in both studies. There were no clinically meaningful adverse trends noted in safety laboratory tests, vital signs, or electrocardiogram parameters. In participants with T2D, lotiglipron resulted in dose-dependent reductions in mean daily glucose. The 180-mg dose was associated with least squares mean decreases from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (-1.61% [90% confidence interval {CI} -2.08, -1.14] vs. -0.61% [-1.56, 0.34] for placebo) and body weight (-5.10 kg [90% CI -6.62, -3.58] vs. -2.06 kg [90% CI -4.47, 0.36] for placebo) after 42 days; a similar magnitude of weight loss was seen in participants with obesity. The observed pharmacokinetic profile supported once-daily dosing. CONCLUSIONS: The profile of once-daily lotiglipron with doses up to 180 mg, as observed in these two Phase 1 studies, indicated a safety and tolerability profile consistent with the mechanism of action, with dose-dependent reductions in glycaemic indices (T2D) and body weight (both populations) after multiple doses. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04305587, NCT05158244.

In Curative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer, There Is a High Possibility That 45 Gy in Five Fractions Will Not Be Tolerated without a Hydrogel Spacer.

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer. This study was a phase 1 dose escalation trial conducted in Japan. Patients with histologically proven prostate cancer without lymph nodes or distant metastases were enrolled. The prescribed doses were 42.5, 45, or 47.5 Gy in five fractions. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade (G) 3+ gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity within 180 days after SBRT completion, and a 6 plus 6 design was used as the method of dose escalation. A total of 16 patients were enrolled, with 6 in the 42.5 Gy group and 10 in the 45 Gy group. No DLT was observed in the 42.5 Gy group. In the 45 Gy group, one patient experienced G3 rectal hemorrhage, and another had G4 rectal perforation, leading to the determination of 42.5 Gy as the MTD. None of the patients experienced biochemical recurrence or death during the follow-up period. We concluded that SBRT for non-metastatic prostate cancer at 42.5 Gy in five fractions could be safely performed, but a total dose of 45 Gy increased severe toxicity.

Durvalumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from the phase 1 CLOVER study.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), current standard of care is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by consolidation durvalumab. However, earlier initiation of durvalumab simultaneously with cCRT may increase antitumor activity relative to initiation after cCRT. The phase 1 CLOVER study (NCT03509012) evaluated durvalumab combined with cCRT in patients with advanced solid tumors; we report findings from the NSCLC cohort. METHODS: CLOVER comprised a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment part, followed by an expansion part. In the NSCLC cohort, patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage III NSCLC were enrolled in three treatment arms: durvalumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) + cisplatin + etoposide + radiotherapy (Arm 1); durvalumab Q4W + carboplatin + paclitaxel + radiotherapy (Arm 2); or durvalumab Q4W + carboplatin or cisplatin + pemetrexed + radiotherapy (non-squamous histology only; Arm 3). Patients received durvalumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled: 21, 22, and 21 in Arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. One patient in Arm 1 had DLT (grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase increase and grade 4 alanine aminotransferase increase); no DLTs were observed in Arms 2 or 3. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 76.6 % of patients overall; the most common were neutropenia (51.6 %), leukopenia (20.3 %), and anemia (17.2 %). In a post-hoc analysis, 7.8 % of patients had grade 3 pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis (grouped term) events. Overall, the objective response rate was 60.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 47.9-72.9); median duration of response was 15.8 months (95 % CI, 9.0-not estimable [NE]). Median progression-free survival was 13.4 months (95 % CI, 8.8-20.1) and median overall survival was not reached (95 % CI, 21.9-NE). CONCLUSION: Durvalumab in combination with cCRT was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile and showed encouraging antitumor activity in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC.

Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel combined with afatinib in metastatic pancreatic cancer - Results of a phase 1b clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The combination of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel is an established standard treatment in the first-line treatment of metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (mPDAC). Afatinib, an oral second-generation pan ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown promising pre-clinical signs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this phase 1b trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with mPDAC. METHODS: Treatment naïve patients (≥18 years) with histologically proven mPDAC and good performance status (ECOG 0/1) were enrolled to receive gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in combination with afatinib. Treatment was continued until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint MTD was determined using a 3 + 3 design. Treatment started at dose level 0 with intravenous gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel 1000 mg/m2 / 125 mg/m2 (day 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle) + oral afatinib 30 mg daily. At dose level + 1 afatinib was increased to 40 mg. Secondary endpoints included safety parameters and exploratory endpoints evaluated treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included in this trial, and 11 patients were treated and analysed in the safety and full analysis set (FAS). At dose level 0 the first three patients did not experience a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). At dose leve (DL) + 1 two patients experienced a DLT. Accordingly, enrolment continued at DL 0 with three more patients, of which one experienced DLT (skin rash ≥ CTCAE grade 3). Seven patients (63.6%) experienced at least one treatment-emergent serious adverse event (TESAE), with four patients (36.4%) experiencing TESAEs grade 3-5 related to the study medication. In the FAS, the objective response rate (ORR) was 36.4%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months and median overall survival in nine evaluable patients was 7.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 1b clinical trial, the MTD of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000 mg/m2 / 125 mg/m2) and afatinib (30 mg) was established. In a cohort of 11 patients, the combination showed an acceptable safety profile.

Evaluation and Application of a PET Tracer in Preclinical and Phase 1 Studies to Determine the Brain Biodistribution of Minzasolmin (UCB0599).

PURPOSE: Minzasolmin (UCB0599) is an orally administered, small molecule inhibitor of ASYN misfolding in development as a potential disease-modifying therapy for Parkinson's disease. Here we describe the preclinical development of a radiolabeled tracer and results from a phase 1 study using the tracer to investigate the brain distribution of minzasolmin. PROCEDURES: In the preclinical study, two radiolabeling positions were investigated on the S-enantiomer of minzasolmin (UCB2713): [11C]methylamine UCB2713 ([11C-N-CH3]UCB2713) and [11C]carbonyl UCB2713 ([11C-CO]UCB2713). Male C57 black 6 mice (N = 10) received intravenous [11C-N-CH3]UCB2713; brain homogenates were assessed for radioactivity and plasma samples analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was used to image brains in a subset of mice (n = 3). In the open-label, phase 1 study, healthy volunteers were scanned twice with PET-CT following injection with [11C]minzasolmin radiotracer (≤ 10 µg), first without, then with oral dosing with non-radiolabeled minzasolmin 360 mg. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: to determine biodistribution of minzasolmin in the human brain; secondary objectives included minzasolmin safety/tolerability. RESULTS: Preclinical data supported the use of [11C]minzasolmin in clinical studies. In the phase 1 study, PET data showed substantial drug signal in the brain of healthy volunteers (N = 4). The mean estimated whole brain total distribution volume (VT) at equilibrium across all regions of interest was 0.512 mL/cm3, no difference in VT was observed following administration of minzasolmin 360 mg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 75% (n = 3) of participants. No drug-related TEAEs, deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations were reported. CONCLUSION: Following positive preclinical results with the N-methyl labeled PET tracer, [11C]minzasolmin was used in the phase 1 study, which demonstrated that minzasolmin readily crossed the blood-brain barrier and was well distributed throughout the brain. Safety and pharmacokinetic findings were consistent with previous early-phase studies (such as UP0077, NCT04875962).

Safety and feasibility of locoregional platelet-rich plasma injection for iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: A phase 1 prospective observational study.

Introduction: Although numerous studies have reported outcomes with various conservative approaches for the iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA), reports on the use of locoregional autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections for the iliopsoas impingement after THA are lacking. This phase 1 study therefore aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of locoregional PRP injection for iliopsoas impingement after THA. Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with iliopsoas impingement after THA who met the criteria for participation (symptoms persisting for more than 3 months, aged 20 years or older, and unable to receive non-steroidal analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs) were eligible to participate in this clinical study. The primary endpoint was observed adverse events including procedure-related pain, and the secondary endpoints included pain and functionality of the hip joint, that were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Japanese Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire, and Forgotten Joint Score-12. Results: Three patients were screened for eligibility, and 3 patients were finally included in this study. Two participants (patients 1 and 2; aged 66 and 65 years, respectively) were female. The third participant (patient 3; age 73 years) was male. All patients experienced adverse events; however, none were found to be serious. None of the patients experienced any infections, or intra- or post-operative symptoms of nerve damage, or subcutaneous haemorrhage owing to the administration of locoregional PRP. Although patient 2 showed almost complete resolution of the symptom, patient 1 and 3 demonstrated persistent groin pain after the injection. Conclusion: We demonstrated the results of preliminary phase 1 prospective observational clinical study that administration of locoregional PRP injections for iliopsoas impingement following THA is both, safe and feasible.

Multicenter phase I dose escalation and expansion study of pyrotinib in combination with camrelizumab and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Background: Pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy showed remarkable efficacy as first-line therapy for advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Pyrotinib is an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor. This single-arm, open-label phase 1 dose-escalation (1a) and expansion (1b) study investigated camrelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, plus pyrotinib and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HER2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Methods: Between June 2020 and June 2022, 41 patients with previously untreated HER2-positive locally advanced unresectable or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled. In phase 1a, patients underwent a 3 + 3 escalating dose design, receiving oral pyrotinib (240 mg, 320 mg, or 400 mg daily), intravenous camrelizumab (200 mg), and CapeOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for two weeks) every 3 weeks until progression, intolerable toxicity or consent withdrawal. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of pyrotinib was determined and used in the phase 1b. The primary endpoints were the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), RP2D, and confirmed objective response rate (ORR). This trial was registered with chictr.org, number ChiCTR2000029717. Findings: Among 41 patients, 10 were in phase 1a (3 at 240 mg, 3 at 400 mg, and 4 at 320 mg due to one patient withdrawing consent), and 31 were in phase 1b. In phase 1a, the MTD of pyrotinib was 320 mg daily due to dose-limiting toxicities (diarrhea [n = 3] and vomiting [n = 1]) observed at 400 mg. Based on all available data, the RP2D of pyrotinib was set at 320 mg. Among 41 patients, 20 patients (48.8%) developed grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and four patients (9.8%) had any grade serious adverse events. No deaths occurred due to TEAEs. Among 27 patients who received the RP2D of pyrotinib and had a post-baseline tumor assessment, two patients (7.4%) achieved a confirmed complete response, and 19 patients (70.4%) achieved a confirmed partial response, resulting in a confirmed ORR of 77.8% (95% CI: 57.7-91.4). Interpretation: Pyrotinib plus camrelizumab and chemotherapy showed promising efficacy in the first-line treatment of advanced HER2-positive G/GEJ cancer. The safety profile was consistent with known toxicities of the agents, and no new or unexpected safety signals were identified. Funding: This study was funded by the Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation (Y-HR2019-0377).

Pharmacokinetics of Edaravone Oral Suspension in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

PURPOSE: Edaravone is a neuroprotective agent approved as an intravenous treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The intravenous administration of edaravone places a burden on patients and there is a clinical need for oral agents for the treatment of ALS. This report aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of an edaravone oral suspension in patients with ALS after oral and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube administration. METHODS: Two single-dose, open-label phase 1 clinical studies were conducted. Edaravone oral suspension (105 mg of edaravone in 5 mL aqueous suspension) was administered orally and via PEG tube to 9 and 6 Japanese patients with ALS, respectively. Plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of unchanged edaravone and its metabolites (sulfate and glucuronide conjugates) were determined. Safety was also evaluated. FINDINGS: After reaching maximum plasma concentration, the mean plasma concentration-time of unchanged edaravone showed a triphasic elimination. Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of the metabolites were higher than those of unchanged edaravone. The mean urinary excretion ratios were higher for the glucuronide conjugate than for either unchanged edaravone or the sulfate conjugate. In patients administered edaravone orally, a single adverse event occurred (blood urine present), which was mild and improved without medical intervention. No adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events were reported. In patients administered edaravone via PEG tube, 5 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 3 patients; none were related to the study drug. No adverse drug reactions were reported. IMPLICATIONS: In patients with ALS, a single dose of edaravone oral suspension was well absorbed and mainly eliminated in urine as the glucuronide conjugate. No safety concerns emerged. Pharmacokinetics were similar to those previously reported in healthy participants following oral administration. This indicates that effective drug concentrations were achieved and edaravone can be successfully administered both orally and via a PEG tube in patients with ALS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04176224 (oral administration) and NCT04254913 (PEG tube administration), www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Phase 1 study of JNJ-64619178, a protein arginine methyltransferase 5 inhibitor, in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Splicing factor (SF) gene mutations are frequent in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and agents that modulate RNA splicing are hypothesized to provide clinical benefit. JNJ-64619178, a protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitor, was evaluated in patients with lower-risk (LR) MDS in a multi-part, Phase 1, multicenter study. The objectives were to determine a tolerable dose and to characterize safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical activity. JNJ-64619178 was administered on a 14 days on/7 days off schedule or every day on a 21-day cycle to patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Low or Intermediate-1 risk MDS who were red blood cell transfusion-dependent. Twenty-four patients were enrolled; 15 (62.5 %) patients had low IPSS risk score, while 18 (75.0 %) had an SF3B1 mutation. Median duration of treatment was 3.45 months (range: 0.03-6.93). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. The 0.5 mg once daily dose was considered better tolerated and chosen for dose expansion. Twenty-three (95.8 %) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). The most common TEAEs were neutropenia (15 [62.5 %]) and thrombocytopenia (14 [58.3 %]). JNJ-64619178 pharmacokinetics was dose-dependent. Target engagement as measured by plasma symmetric di-methylarginine was observed across all dose levels; however, variant allele frequency of clonal mutations in bone marrow or blood did not show sustained reductions from baseline. No patient achieved objective response or hematologic improvement per International Working Group 2006 criteria, or transfusion independence. A tolerable dose of JNJ-64619178 was identified in patients with LR MDS. However, no evidence of clinical benefit was observed.

HLX22, an anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: an open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial.

HLX22 is a novel monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This first-in-human, phase 1 dose-escalation study aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of HLX22 in patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed or were intolerant to standard therapies. Enrolled patients aged 18 to 75 years with histologically confirmed HER2-overexpressing advanced or metastatic solid tumors received intravenous HLX22 once every 3 weeks at 3, 10, and 25 mg/kg. Primary endpoints were safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Between July 31, 2019, and December 27, 2021, 11 patients were enrolled to receive HLX22 at 3 (n = 5), 10 (n = 3), and 25 (n = 3) mg/kg doses. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were lymphocyte count decreased (45.5%), white blood cell count decreased (36.4%), and hypokalemia (36.4%). No serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities occurred during the treatment period, and the MTD was determined at 25 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. Systemic exposure of HLX22 increased with escalating dose levels. No patients achieved a complete or partial response, and four (36.4%) had stable disease. The disease control rate and median progression-free survival were 36.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9-64.8) and 44.0 days (95% CI, 41.0-170.0), respectively. HLX22 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors overexpressing HER2 after failure of standard therapies. The study results support further investigation of HLX22 in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic exploration of various combinations of tegoprazan immediate and delayed-release formulations.

AIMS: The new modified-release formulation of tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to improve the management of acid-related disease, including nocturnal acid breakthrough, by prolonging the duration of acid suppression. This study aimed to explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of various combinations of tegoprazan with immediate-release (IR) and delayed-release (DR) formulations. METHODS: A three-cohort, open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-treatment, six-sequence, three-period crossover study was conducted. Various combinations of tegoprazan IR and DR formulations (50, 75 or 100 mg) were administered orally once per period. The 24-h intragastric pH was monitored before and after each administration. PK blood samples were collected for up to 48 h. PK and PD were compared among treatments. RESULTS: Eighteen healthy Korean subjects completed the study. All treatment groups showed intragastric pH above 4 approximately 1 h following tegoprazan administration. Among the various combinations, the IR and DR combination at a 1:1 ratio induced greater gastric acid suppression (%Time pH ≥ 4) than IR alone in each dose group, both for 24 h (50 mg; 59% vs. 52%, P = .2188, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.92-22.27, 100 mg; 85% vs. 70%, P < .05, 95% CI 8.92-22.19) and at night (50 mg; 27% vs. 16%, P = .1563, 95% CI -11.79-37.71, 100 mg; 77% vs. 49%, P < .05, 95% CI 16.14-42.98), with similar systemic exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The combinatorial tegoprazan in the IR and DR 1:1 ratio formulation was found to induce stronger gastric acid suppression throughout the day and at night, compared to the conventional IR formulation.

Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety of Reducing the Prophylactic Dose of Dexamethasone around Docetaxel Infusion in Patients with Prostate and Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence that supports the registered high dose of dexamethasone used around docetaxel. However, this high dose is associated with considerable side effects. This study evaluates the feasibility of reducing the prophylactic oral dosage of dexamethasone around docetaxel infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate or breast cancer and had received at least three cycles of docetaxel as monotherapy or combination therapy. Prophylactic dexamethasone around docetaxel infusion was administered in a de-escalating order per cohort of patients. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of grade III/IV fluid retention and hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). RESULTS: Of the 46 enrolled patients, 39 were evaluable (prostate cancer (n = 25), breast cancer (n = 14). In patients with prostate cancer, the dosage of dexamethasone was reduced to a single dose of 4 mg; in patients with breast cancer, the dosage was reduced to a 3-day schedule of 4 mg-8 mg-4 mg once daily, after which no further reduction has been tested. None of the 39 patients developed grade III/IV fluid retention or HSR. One patient (2.6%) had a grade 1 HSR, and there were six patients (15.4%) with grade I or II edema. There were no differences in quality of life (QoL) between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that the prophylactic dose of dexamethasone around docetaxel infusion can be safely reduced with respect to the occurrence of grade III/IV HSRs or the fluid retention syndrome.

A phase 1 study of veliparib (ABT-888) plus weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced solid malignancies, with an expansion cohort in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ETCTN 8620).

BACKGROUND: Veliparib is a poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and it has clinical activity with every 3 weeks carboplatin and paclitaxel. In breast cancer, weekly paclitaxel is associated with improved overall survival. We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of veliparib with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as well as safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors and adequate organ function were eligible. A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was followed by a TNBC expansion cohort. Veliparib doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg orally bid were tested with carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) given weekly in a 21-day cycle. Adverse events (AE) were evaluated by CTCAE v4.0, and objective response rate (ORR) was determined by RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 22 had TNBC. Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The RP2D was determined to be 150 mg PO bid veliparib with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel 2 weeks on, 1 week off, based on hematologic toxicity requiring dose reduction in the first 5 cycles of treatment. The most common grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. PK parameters of veliparib were comparable to single-agent veliparib. In 23 patients with evaluable disease, the ORR was 65%. In 19 patients with TNBC with evaluable disease, the ORR was 63%. CONCLUSION: Veliparib can be safely combined with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin, and this triplet combination has promising clinical activity.

A phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of danuglipron (PF-06882961), an oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: This study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of danuglipron (PF-06882961), which is a novel, oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study enrolled adult Japanese participants with T2DM inadequately controlled on diet and exercise. Participants received twice-daily oral doses of placebo or multiple ascending doses of danuglipron titrated to 40, 80 or 120 mg twice daily over 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the safety and tolerability of danuglipron. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included plasma pharmacokinetics, glycaemic parameters and body weight. RESULTS: In the 37 participants randomized, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, diarrhoea and headache. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity. Dose-proportional increases in danuglipron exposure parameters were observed at steady state (Day 56). Significant reductions from baseline were observed with danuglipron on Day 56 for mean daily glucose [least squares mean (90% confidence interval) placebo-adjusted difference of up to -67.89 (-88.98, -46.79) mg/dl] and on Day 57 for fasting plasma glucose [up to -40.87 (-53.77, -27.98) mg/dl], glycated haemoglobin [up to -1.41% (-2.01%, -0.82%)] and body weight [up to -1.87 (-3.58, -0.17) kg]. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese adults with T2DM, danuglipron exhibited dose-proportional increases in plasma exposure at steady state and robustly reduced glycaemic parameters and body weight after 8 weeks of dosing, with a safety profile consistent with the mechanism of action.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of ABI-H2158, a hepatitis B virus core inhibitor: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 study.

Treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) is mostly indefinite, with new finite-duration therapies needed. We report safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of the investigational HBV core inhibitor ABI-H2158. This Phase 1a/b study (NCT03714152) had three parts: Part A, participants received a single ascending oral dose of ABI-H2158 (5-500 mg) or placebo; Part B, participants received multiple doses of ABI-H2158 300 mg once (QD) or twice (BID) daily or placebo, for 10 days; Part C, cHBV patients received ABI-H2158 (100, 300, or 500 mg QD or 300 mg BID) or placebo, for 14 days. Ninety-three participants enrolled. In Parts A/B, there were no serious adverse events (SAEs) or deaths, and all treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were Grade 1. In Part C, two patients had Grade 3 TEAEs unrelated to ABI-H2158; there were no deaths, SAEs or Grade 4 TEAEs. In Part A, median time to maximum ABI-H2158 plasma concentration (Tmax ) and mean terminal elimination half-life (t½ ) were 1-4 and 9.8-20.7 h, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve increased dose proportionally. In Part B, Day 10 Tmax was 2 h, mean t½ was 15.5-18.4 h, and exposure accumulated 1.7- to 3.1-fold. In Part C, Day 14 Tmax was 1 h, exposure accumulated 1.4- to 1.8-fold, and ABI-H2158 was associated with >2 log10 declines in HBV nucleic acids. In conclusion, ABI-H2158 in cHBV patients following 14 days of dosing was well tolerated and demonstrated potent antiviral activity. Safety and pharmacokinetics supported future QD dosing.

Conteltinib (CT-707) in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Conteltinib (CT-707) is a potent second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) showing promising anti-tumor activities in preclinical studies. This study aimed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and efficacy of conteltinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this multicenter, single-arm, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study, conteltinib was taken orally at doses of 50 to 800 mg quaque die (QD) in a dose-escalation phase. If the response was observed in a dose cohort of the dose-escalation phase, dose expansion was started. The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and adverse events assessed by investigators. RESULTS: Between April 13, 2016, and February 8, 2020, 64 ALK-positive NSCLC patients were enrolled, including 41 (64.1%) patients with ALK TKI-naïve and 23 (35.9%) patients who received crizotinib previously. In the dose-escalation phase, 26 patients were treated with conteltinib at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, 450 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg QD. One DLT event was reported at the dose of 600 mg. MTD was not reached. Overall, 58 (90.6%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 9 (14.1%) patients had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were diarrhea (46 [71.9%]), serum creatinine elevated (29 [45.3%]), aspartate aminotransferase elevated (25 [39.1%]), and nausea (24 [37.5%]). Among 39 ALK TKI-naïve patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 64.1% (25 of 39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47.2-78.8), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.9 months (95% CI, 9.26-23.3), and median duration of response (DoR) was 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.06-25.8). Among 21 patients who received crizotinib previously, the ORR was 33.3% (7 of 21; 95% CI, 14.6-57.0), median PFS was 6.73 months (95% CI, 4.73-8.54), and median DoR was 6.60 months (95% CI, 3.77-13.3). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, conteltinib showed manageable safety profile, favorable PK properties, and anti-tumor activity in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 600 mg QD for ALK TKI-naïve patients and 300 mg bis in die (BID) for patients who received crizotinib previously. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02695550.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Treprostinil Palmitil Inhalation Powder for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Single- and Multiple-Dose Study.

INTRODUCTION: Treprostinil is a prostacyclin vasodilator widely used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and, in its inhaled form, for pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). Treprostinil palmitil inhalation powder (TPIP) is a dry powder formulation of treprostinil palmitil (TP), an ester prodrug of treprostinil. TPIP is designed to provide sustained release of treprostinil in the lung over a prolonged period, potentially enabling a once-daily (QD) dosing regimen and significantly higher tolerated doses compared with currently available treprostinil formulations. This phase 1 study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of TP and treprostinil following single and multiple QD administrations of TPIP in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Healthy adults (aged 18-45 years) were randomized to receive single or multiple QD inhalation doses of TPIP. Participants in the single-dose phase received TPIP 112.5, 225, 450, or 675 µg (n = 6/dose) or placebo (n = 2). Participants in the multiple-dose phase received TPIP 225 µg QD for 7 days (n = 6), 112.5 µg QD for 4 days followed by 225 µg QD for 3 days (n = 6), or placebo for 7 days (n = 4). RESULTS: Overall, 41 of 42 participants (97.6%) completed the study. In the single-dose phase, 70.8% (n = 17/24) of TPIP-treated participants experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) vs 0% (n = 0/2) of placebo-treated participants; the most common TEAEs (≥ 20%) were cough (45.8%), dizziness (29.2%), and throat irritation (20.8%). In the multiple-dose phase, 83.3% (n = 10/12) of TPIP-treated participants experienced a TEAE vs 50.0% of placebo-treated participants (n = 2/4); the most common TEAEs were cough (58.3% TPIP vs 50.0% placebo), headache (50.0% vs 0%), nausea (33.3% vs 0%), chest discomfort (33.3% vs 0%), and dizziness (25.0% vs 0%). Most TEAEs were mild; only seven patients experienced a moderate TEAE, and no severe or serious TEAEs occurred. In the multiple-dose phase, participants whose doses were titrated from TPIP 112.5 µg QD to 225 µg QD experienced fewer TEAEs than those who received 225 µg QD at treatment initiation (66.7% vs 100.0%), and all TEAEs with dose titration were mild. After a single dose of TPIP, treprostinil elimination t1/2 was 8.67-11.6 h and exposure was dose proportional, with mean (CV%) Cmax 78.4-717 pg/mL (38.6-72.9%) and AUC0-∞ 1090-5480 pg·h/mL (11.5-30.0%). At steady state (TPIP 225 µg), the mean (CV%) of Cmax, Cmin, and AUCτ were 193-228 pg/mL (32.9-46.4%), 17.6-22.8 ng/mL (43.7-64.4%), and 1680-1820 pg·h/mL (28.7-36.6%), respectively. The elimination t1/2 was 6.84-8.82 h after repeat dosing. No steady-state accumulation was observed. Plasma concentrations of TP were below the limit of quantification (100 pg/mL) at all time points measured. CONCLUSION: TPIP was well tolerated at the doses tested, and dose titration improved tolerability. Treprostinil pharmacokinetics were linear and supportive of a QD treatment regimen. These results support further development of TPIP in patients with PAH and PH-ILD.