Comparing the trends of MBS telepsychiatry and consultant physician telehealth services from 2017 to 2022: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) telehealth items were expanded in March 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured the use of MBS telepsychiatry items compared to consultant physician telehealth items within the context of these item changes, to understand differences in telepsychiatry and physician telehealth utilisation. METHODS: Monthly counts of face-to-face and telehealth (videoconferencing and telephone) MBS items for psychiatrists and physicians from January 2017 to December 2022 were compiled from Services Australia MBS Item Reports. Usage levels were compared before and after telehealth item expansion. Usage trends for MBS telepsychiatry and physician telehealth items were compared in time-series plots. RESULTS: Telehealth item expansion resulted in a greater rise of telepsychiatry services from 3.8% beforehand to 43.8% of total services subsequently, compared with physician telehealth services (from 0.6% to 20.0%). More physician telehealth services were by telephone compared with telepsychiatry services. Time-series of both telehealth services displayed similar patterns until mid-2022, when physician telehealth services declined as telephone items were restricted. Telepsychiatry services consistently comprised a greater proportion of total services than physician telehealth services. CONCLUSIONS: MBS psychiatrist services showed a more substantial and persistent shift to telehealth than physician services, suggesting a greater preference and use of telepsychiatry.

Study on needle stick injuries during surgery and blunt needle use for reducing occupational exposure and hygiene benefits.

BACKGROUND: The conventional round suture needle poses a significant risk of needle stick injuries among surgical physicians, identified as a global occupational hazard by the World Health Organization, increasing hospital costs and exposure to bloodborne pathogens. While novel blunt suture needles have shown promise in reducing these risks, their adoption is limited domestically, prompting a study to compare their efficacy against traditional sharp needles in reducing needle stick injuries among surgical physicians. OBJECTIVE: To investigate suture needle stick injuries among surgical doctors during operations and assess the application effectiveness of a novel blunt suture needle. METHODS: A total of 106 surgical department physicians from March 2021 to February 2023 participated in the study. After completing a questionnaire survey on suture needle injuries during surgery, the participants were divided into two groups. Over a 6-month intervention period, the control group used regular round needles while the study group utilized novel blunt suture needles. Subsequently, suture needle injury incidence rates and economic hygiene benefits were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The suture needle injury questionnaire survey showed that over the past 6 months, among 106 surgical department physicians, 20 needle stick injuries occurred, yielding an incidence rate of 18.87%. The highest incidence (65.00%) was during suturing incisions longer than 10 cm, primarily when visibility was poor (70.00%). Surgeons linked most injuries (60.00%) to prolonged surgical duration causing fatigue. Although 85.00% detected injuries within 1 minute, only 40.00% were reported, often due to perceived reporting complexity. Following intervention, the study group had significantly fewer injuries per surgery and lower occupational exposure costs compared to the control group (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgical department physicians commonly sustain suture needle injuries while suturing incisions of 5-10 cm length under poor visibility, exacerbated by prolonged surgical duration. Despite detecting most injuries within 1 minute, only 40% are reported. The implementation of novel blunt suture needles significantly decreases injury rates, resulting in reduced occupational exposure costs and favorable safety and economic hygiene outcomes.

Perceptions of C-reactive Protein Measurement Among General Physicians: A Qualitative Study on Diagnostic Value, Clinical Dilemmas, and Professional Growth.

Introduction C-reactive protein (CRP) is a widely used laboratory test for assessing infections, inflammatory diseases, and malignancies, playing a critical role in clinical diagnosis and management. Despite its utility, CRP measurement practices vary among physicians, often influenced by training and clinical experience. This study explores general physicians' perceptions of CRP measurement in clinical practice, focusing on its diagnostic value, associated dilemmas, and impact on clinical growth and decision-making. Methods This qualitative study employed thematic analysis to examine the perceptions of general physicians at Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, Japan regarding CRP measurement. Sixteen general physicians were selected through purposive sampling and participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted in Japanese, recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively to identify themes. The analysis involved iterative coding and extensive discussion among the research team to ensure the reliability and validity of the findings. Results Three main themes emerged from the analysis: the usefulness of CRP for diagnosis and collaboration, dilemmas associated with CRP usage, and clinical growth through reconsideration of CRP's importance. Physicians highlighted CRP's value in distinguishing inflammatory from non-inflammatory diseases, predicting clinical courses, and facilitating communication with specialists. However, dilemmas arose from discrepancies between CRP levels and clinical symptoms, the influence of various non-specific factors, and habitual testing driven by training, leading to unnecessary tests and diminished clinical skills. Participants recognized the need to view CRP as one of many diagnostic tools, cultivate a habit of questioning its necessity, and reflect on its use to enhance clinical reasoning and professional growth. Conclusions CRP measurement is a valuable diagnostic tool, but effective use requires a balanced and critical approach. Discrepancies between CRP levels and clinical symptoms can lead to over-reliance on laboratory results and unnecessary testing. General physicians should integrate CRP within a broader diagnostic framework, combining it with patient history, physical examination, and other tests. Reflecting on the necessity and implications of CRP measurements can improve clinical reasoning and decision-making, ultimately enhancing patient care and resource management. Future research should explore similar perceptions in diverse healthcare settings and develop strategies to optimize CRP use in clinical practice.

The relationship between departmental culture and resuscitation-related moral distress among inpatient medical departments physicians and nurses.

BACKGROUND: While moral distress frequency and intensity have been reported among clinicians around the world, resuscitations have not been well documented as its source. OBJECTIVES: to examine the relationship between intensity and frequency of resuscitation- related moral distress and departmental culture among nurses and physicians working in inpatient medical departments. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, prospective study of medical inpatient department staff from three hospitals. Questionnaires included a demographic and work characteristics questionnaire, the Resuscitation-Related Moral Distress Scale (a revised version of the Moral Distress Scale measuring frequency and intensity of moral distress), and a Departmental Culture Questionnaire. RESULTS: 64 physicians and 201 nurses (response rate 64 %) participated, with a mean of 8.4 (SD = 5.1) resuscitations in the previous 6 months. Highest moral distress frequency scores were reported for items related to family demands or having no medical decision related to life- saving interventions for dying patients. Highest moral distress intensity scores were found when appropriate care for deteriorating patients was not given due poor staffing and when witnessing a resuscitation that could have been prevented had the staff identified the deterioration on time. Most participants strongly agreed (n = 228, 86.0 %) that their department medical director considers it important for staff to determine patients' end-of-life preferences and that quality of life is of the highest value. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians working in medical inpatient department suffer from moderate frequency and high intensity levels of resuscitation-related moral distress. There was a statistically significant association between intention to leave employment with resuscitation-related moral distress frequency and intensity.

The "Magical Theory" of AI in Medicine: Thematic Narrative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The discourse surrounding medical artificial intelligence (AI) often focuses on narratives that either hype the technology's potential or predict dystopian futures. AI narratives have a significant influence on the direction of research, funding, and public opinion and thus shape the future of medicine. OBJECTIVE: The paper aims to offer critical reflections on AI narratives, with a specific focus on medical AI, and to raise awareness as to how people working with medical AI talk about AI and discharge their "narrative responsibility." METHODS: Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with 41 participants from different disciplines who were exposed to medical AI in their profession. The research represents a secondary analysis of data using a thematic narrative approach. The analysis resulted in 2 main themes, each with 2 other subthemes. RESULTS: Stories about the AI-physician interaction depicted either a competitive or collaborative relationship. Some participants argued that AI might replace physicians, as it performs better than physicians. However, others believed that physicians should not be replaced and that AI should rather assist and support physicians. The idea of excessive technological deferral and automation bias was discussed, highlighting the risk of "losing" decisional power. The possibility that AI could relieve physicians from burnout and allow them to spend more time with patients was also considered. Finally, a few participants reported an extremely optimistic account of medical AI, while the majority criticized this type of story. The latter lamented the existence of a "magical theory" of medical AI, identified with techno-solutionist positions. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the participants reported a nuanced view of technology, recognizing both its benefits and challenges and avoiding polarized narratives. However, some participants did contribute to the hype surrounding medical AI, comparing it to human capabilities and depicting it as superior. Overall, the majority agreed that medical AI should assist rather than replace clinicians. The study concludes that a balanced narrative (that focuses on the technology's present capabilities and limitations) is necessary to fully realize the potential of medical AI while avoiding unrealistic expectations and hype.

Exploring the Usage of Social Media Networking Platforms Among Medical Practitioners: Reasons, and Proposed Features for Improved Experience.

PURPOSE: This study aims to identify and prioritize the reasons for social media use among medical practitioners to facilitate the selection of the most appropriate social media platforms for healthcare providers. The findings of this study will help address the challenges posed by the wide variety of available social media platforms and assist healthcare providers in choosing platforms that best meet their professional needs. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the period of two months, i.e., August and September 2021. This study is based on the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method of the MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) approach. In the first phase, a four-hour brainstorming session was held to identify the medical Practitioner's reasons for social media usage; in the second phase, the identified reasons were linked with the top five social media platforms to determine the prioritized order of preference. FINDINGS: The top three reasons driving medical practitioners' usage of social media platforms include "Getting an update on current affairs," "Network with industry professionals," and "Healthy Lifestyle and Wellness Promotion." In contrast, the bottom three causes include "Advocacy for causes," "Get Updates about friends and family members," and "Opinions and ideas sharing." The prioritized order of social media platforms is LinkedIn, followed by Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook, and Twitter. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study helps solve the medical Practitioner's dilemma of selecting suitable social media platforms that serve their intended functions. In the future, it is expected that the usage of SM platforms will increase for causes such as Institution Branding and Healthcare Issues related Advocacy as well. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Previous research has not adequately identified the reasons driving social media usage by physicians. This study is one of the few studies that has attempted to prioritize reasons for social media usage by physicians and has provided a prioritized list of social media platforms.

Point-of-care ultrasound to assess left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure in unselected patients in primary care: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is the most frequent cardiovascular pathology in primary care. Echocardiography is the gold standard for diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis of HF. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is of growing interest in daily practice. AIM: This study aimed to systematically review the literature to evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment of unselected patients in primary care by non-expert physicians with cardiac POCUS (cPOCUS). METHODS: We searched in Medline, Embase, and Pubmed up to January 2024 for interventional and non-interventional studies assessing LVEF with cPOCUS in unselected patients with suspected or diagnosed HF in hospital or outpatient settings, performed by non-expert physicians. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were included, involving 6598 patients, of whom 60.2% were outpatients. LVEF was assessed by 351 non-expert physicians after an initial ultrasound training course. The LVEF was mainly assessed by visual estimation (90.2%). The most frequent views were parasternal long/short axis, and apical 4-chamber. The median time of cPOCUS was 8 minutes. A strong agreement was found (κ = 0.72 [0.63; 0.83]) compared to experts when using different types of ultrasound devices (hand-held and standard), and agreement was excellent (κ = 0.84 [0.71; 0.89]) with the same device. Training course combined a median of 4.5 hours for theory and 25 cPOCUS for practice. CONCLUSION: The use of cPOCUS by non-expert physicians after a short training course appears to be an accurate complementary tool for LVEF assessment in daily practice. Its diffusion in primary care could optimize patient management, without replacing specialist assessment.

Heart failure (HF) is the most frequent cardiovascular pathology in primary care. Echocardiography is the gold standard for its diagnosis, follow up and prognosis, especially for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), one of the essential hemodynamic cardiac markers. At a time when access to specialists is difficult, what if primary health care physicians had a tool that enabled them to sort and prioritize patients with suspected or diagnosed HF? Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is already used in daily medical practice to provide optimum bedside diagnostics and tailored medical cares. Thus, we conduct a systematic review up to January 2024, including 42 studies, gathering 6598 patients with suspected or diagnosed HF, with 60% of outpatients. After a brief theoretical and practical training (a median of 4.5 hours and 25 cardiac POCUS), 351 physicians without expertise in cardiac ultrasound (defined as "non-experts") evaluated LVEF in unselected patients with cardiac POCUS, then compared with the experts' assessment. A strong to excellent agreement was found between the two groups, depending on the type of ultrasound device used. The LVEF assessment using cardiac POCUS after a short training course appears to be an accurate complementary tool for non-expert physicians. Its diffusion in primary care could optimize patient management, without replacing specialist assessment.

Treatment Patterns and Preferences for Graves' Disease in Korea: Insights from a Nationwide Cohort Study.

Treatment patterns and preferences for patients with Graves' disease (GD) vary across countries. In this study, we assessed the initial therapies and subsequent treatment modalities employed for GD in real-world clinical practice in Korea. We analyzed 452,001 patients with GD from 2004 to 2020, obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Initial treatments included antithyroid drug (ATD) therapy (98% of cases), thyroidectomy (1.3%), and radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy (0.7%). The rates of initial treatment failure were 58.5% for ATDs, 21.3% for RAI, and 2.1% for thyroidectomy. Even among cases of ATD treatment failure or recurrence, the rates of RAI therapy remained low. Regarding initial treatment, the 5-year remission rate was 46.8% among patients administered ATDs versus 91.0% among recipients of RAI therapy; at 10 years, these rates were 59.2% and 94.0%, respectively. Our findings highlight a marked disparity in the use of RAI therapy in Korea compared to Western countries. Further research is required to understand the reasons for these differences in treatment patterns.

Optimal hyperglycemia thresholds in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a cross sectional study of oncologists' practices.

PURPOSE: Neither the United States nor the European oncology guidelines include details for appropriate management of hyperglycemia in cancer patients. The aim was to identify fasting and random blood glucose thresholds, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets used by oncologists in clinical practice when managing hyperglycemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: This national, cross sectional study utilized a questionnaire to collect oncologists' perceptions about optimal blood glucose thresholds and HbA1c targets in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize glucose thresholds, HbA1c targets, and sample characteristics. Responses to an open-ended question about oncologists' approach to hyperglycemia management were analyzed via thematic analysis using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 229) were on average 52.1 years of age, 67.7% men, and 91.3% White. For patients without diabetes but experiencing hyperglycemia, oncologists targeted lower and upper fasting blood glucose levels between 75-121 mg/dL and 105-135 mg/dL, respectively. For patients with diabetes, the targets for lower and upper fasting blood glucose levels ranged between 100-130 mg/dL and 128-150 mg/dL, respectively. Fasting blood glucose (95.6%) and HbA1c (78.6%) were the most commonly used clinical indicators to consider chemotherapy dose reduction, delay, or discontinuation due to hyperglycemia in patients receiving chemotherapy with curative intent. Among those receiving palliative intent chemotherapy, the preferred clinical parameters were random blood glucose (90.0%), patient-reported blood glucose readings (70.7%), continuous glucose monitoring readings (65.1%), and patient-reported symptoms of hyperglycemia (65.1%). Three main themes emerged about oncologists' approach to hyperglycemia management: 1) identification of high-risk patients; 2) need for early identification, screening, and diagnosis of hyperglycemia; and 3) multiple hyperglycemia management strategies. CONCLUSION: Oncologists reported a wide variation of target blood glucose ranges considered appropriate in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Lack of clear guidance for hyperglycemia management during chemotherapy in the United States may be contributing to a lack of consistency in clinical practice.

Physicians, Public Discourse, and Passive Euthanasia of Infants with Down Syndrome in the Late-Twentieth Century.

Through the late-twentieth century, physicians endorsed the denial of life-saving surgeries to infants because they had Down syndrome. Grim physician assessments of the inevitable burden of Down syndrome found ideological footing in the 1970s crusade to eradicate the condition, a public health goal made possible by new genetic diagnostics and a weakened abortion law. What is most striking about this physician-sanctioned passive euthanasia is that it persisted even in an era of unprecedented expansion of disability rights. Physician endorsement of the euthanasia of infants with Down syndrome offers a powerful corrective to the notion that post-war Canada was marked by waning support for eugenics. Medically sanctioned euthanasia of babies because of their Down syndrome, eugenics of the most extreme type, thrived in late-twentieth century Canada.

Jusqu'à la fin du vingtième siècle, les médecins ont approuvé le refus de pratiquer des interventions chirurgicales vitales sur des nourrissons parce qu'ils étaient atteints du syndrome de Down. La sombre évaluation par les médecins du fardeau inévitable qu'entraînait le syndrome de Down a trouvé un fondement idéologique dans la croisade des années 1970 pour éradiquer la maladie, un objectif de santé publique rendu possible par les nouveaux diagnostics génétiques et grâce à une loi sur l'avortement moins sévère. L'aspect le plus frappant de cette euthanasie passive sanctionnée par les médecins est qu'elle a persisté à une époque d'expansion sans précédent des droits des personnes handicapées. L'approbation par les médecins de l'euthanasie des nourrissons atteints du syndrome de Down apporte un puissant correctif à l'idée que le Canada de l'après-guerre a été caractérisé par une baisse du soutien à l'eugénisme. L'euthanasie médicalement sanctionnée de bébés en raison du syndrome de Down, c'est-à-dire l'eugénisme le plus extrême, a au contraire prospéré dans le Canada de la fin du vingtième siècle.

Development and Psychometric Analysis of the Physician and Nurse Brain Drain Attitude Scale.

Background and Purpose: The Physician and Nurse Brain Drain Attitude Scale measures healthcare professionals' attitudes toward brain drain, which affects healthcare systems in developing countries. Methods: The scale was developed using the methodologies proposed by Timothy R. Hinkin and Robert F. DeVellis, including qualitative research, expert evaluations, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, with a sample of physicians and nurses from Izmir, Türkiye. Results: The scale comprises two factors: push and pull factors, demonstrating high reliability and confirmed validity through statistical tests indicating good fit and discriminant validity. Negative attitudes toward brain drain were linked to lower job satisfaction. Conclusions: This validated scale provides a crucial tool for understanding healthcare professionals' perspectives on migration and its contributing factors.

Prescription patterns of statins in cirrhotic patients: a survey among primary care physicians and cardiologists.

Background: Statin therapy is widely utilized for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, both as a primary and secondary measure. Despite the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases' endorsement of statin use in cirrhotic patients, practitioners exhibit hesitancy, primarily due to concerns regarding hepatotoxicity. This study aimed to evaluate statin prescription patterns in cirrhotic patients by primary care physicians (PCPs) and cardiologists through a survey. Methods: A voluntary survey via Survey Monkey with nine objective-type questions was sent to 220 PCPs and 75 cardiologists within Allegheny Health Network. Survey results were collected, and a chi square test was used to compare the two groups. A P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 64 PCPs (29.1%) and 15 cardiologists (20%) completed the survey. Overall, 12.6% did not prescribe statins for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in compensated cirrhotic patients. While all cardiologists prescribed statins for secondary prevention, over 50% preferred lower-intensity options. Conversely, 14.1% of PCPs avoided statin prescriptions for secondary prevention. Cardiologists were significantly more inclined to prescribe statins, especially for cirrhosis due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease compared to PCPs (73.3% vs 45.3%, P = 0.05). Conclusions: Despite increasing evidence favoring use of statins in cirrhosis for improving portal hemodynamics and decreasing ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and mortality, there is still hesitation on the part of prescribers for the fear of worsening liver disease. Wider dissemination of current guidelines and education practices may help to bridge this gap.

Dr. Kadambini Ganguly (1861-1923): A Pioneer in Indian Medicine.

Dr. Kadambini Ganguly was a trailblazing Indian physician and social reformer. As one of the first female graduates and practitioners of Western medicine in India, she broke numerous barriers in a field dominated by men. Her contribution to medicine, particularly in women's healthcare, and her engagement in social reform through the Brahmo Samaj and the Indian National Congress, caused significant progress toward gender equality and social justice. This article looks back on her academic accomplishments, medical career, social activism, and lasting legacy, emphasizing her profound influence on medicine and society in India.

The Landscape of Pain Medicine for Women Physicians: A Perspective.

BACKGROUND: The gender bias in academic anesthesiology is well known. Women are not only a minority in the field but also underrepresented in leadership positions. Reported reasons for this underrepresentation include barriers to career advancement, lack of mentorship, and differences in compensation, among others. Interventional pain, a competitive procedural subspecialty of anesthesiology, sees the trickle-down effects of this disparity. According to a report from the ACGME that sorted medical subspecialties by number of female trainees, pain medicine ranked in the bottom quartile across all disciplines from 2008-2016. OBJECTIVES: To better understand the landscape for women physicians in the field of pain medicine, we undertook this investigation to review the knowledge about the topic and what questions remain unanswered. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a review of the current literature and aims to summarize and describe the landscape of pain medicine for women physicians. SETTING: All literature review and manuscript preparation took place at the Yale University School of Medicine. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for the combined terms "gender disparity," "pain medicine," and "anesthesiology," limiting our search to the year 2000 onward for the most recent literature on the topic. Our initial search retrieved 38 articles. All relevant articles pertaining to this perspective piece were collated. The available literature is discussed below. RESULTS: Women are underrepresented in interventional pain. The grim scarcity of female pain physicians is unlikely to improve soon, since while the number of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education pain fellowship programs continues to grow, women trainees comprise only between 22-25% of all pain medicine fellows. Additionally, although studies have compared the numbers of male interventional pain faculty to their female counterparts in academic hospitals and shown the ratio to range from 71.84-82% to 18-28.52%, respectively, no studies have truly explored the landscape for women physicians in private practice. Patients prefer and have better experiences with physicians who are racially and ethnically like themselves. In fact, the preference for and the lack of female clinicians have been associated with delayed pursuit of care and adverse health outcomes. The consequences of the burnout and attrition caused by the gender disparity, especially in a field like pain medicine, cannot be understate. LIMITATIONS: The review might not have been comprehensive, and relevant studies might not have been included. CONCLUSION: While the gender disparity in academia is well documented for both anesthesiology and pain medicine, the reasons for this disparity have not been fully explored. Moreover, it is also unknown whether the minority of female physicians who select pain medicine as a subspecialty gravitate toward an academic or a private-practice path. To address the existing gender disparity, it is necessary to explore the landscape of interventional pain medicine in both academic and private practices and understand pain physicians' beliefs and sentiments regarding their subspecialty.

Christ the Physician: A Theological Framework for Healing in Catholic Health Care.

The metaphor of Christ the physician features prominently in the gospels and the preaching of the Church Fathers, emphasizing that Jesus' work of healing extends beyond bodily ills to spiritual healing as well. Given that the end of medicine is "health," which involves wholeness of body and soul, Christ is uniquely able to accomplish this in us-beginning with grace in our souls in this life, and culminating in the resurrection of the body and restoration of body and soul in glory at the end of time. Drawing on the thought of the Church Fathers and Thomas Aquinas, this paper considers how Catholic health care is distinctly positioned to continue Christ's work of bodily and spiritual healing through medical and sacramental approaches-as we await our perfect and ultimate healing upon Christ's return in glory.

Predictors of a positive attitude towards rural practice in female osteopathic medical students.

CONTEXT: Women outnumber men in medical school. Given the growing need for rural physicians and the underrepresentation of women in rural medicine, understanding predictors of rural practice among female students is imperative for addressing future healthcare workforce shortages in rural areas. Utilizing current evidence, medical schools should seek to admit students with a rural background and interest in pursuing a primary care specialty; however, whether this holds true for female osteopathic medical students is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine if a rural background, a plan to practice family medicine, and motivation toward civic duty are associated with attitudes toward eventual practice of rural medicine in female osteopathic medical students. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was administered to actively enrolled female students at Arkansas Colleges of Health Education College of Osteopathic Medicine. The survey assessed the respondents' presence of a rural background, degree of civic-mindedness, intention to practice family medicine, and attitudes to rural work and life. Demographics of ethnicity and year of study in medical school were also collected. In total, 129 students responded to the survey, with 97 complete responses for analysis. Hierarchical regression was utilized to compare nested models and interpret interactions. RESULTS: Of the 97 survey respondents, 34.0 % described themselves as first-year students, 37.1 % as second-year students, 16.5 % as third-year students, and 12.4 % as fourth-year students. Linear regression modeling indicated that for female medical students at Arkansas Colleges of Health Education, having a rural background had no relationship with their attitude toward practicing in a rural setting, ß=-0.97, standard error (SE)=1.96, t=-0.49, p>0.05, CI [-4.86, 2.92]. Civic-mindedness had a positive relationship with their attitude toward practicing in a rural setting, ß=0.17, SE=0.07, t=2.44, p=0.016, CI [0.03, 0.31], accounting for 4.57 % of its variance. Plan to practice family medicine was positively associated with a student's attitude toward practicing in a rural setting, ß=4.38, SE=0.85, t=5.15, p<0.001, CI [2.69, 6.07], accounting for 20.25 % of its variance. Civic-mindedness appeared to moderate the relationship between planning to practice family medicine and attitudes toward practicing in a rural setting, F(1, 91) = 3.91, p=0.05, R 2=0.31. The p value for this interaction term was 0.05, but its effect size measure and graphical representation revealed a substantive effect. CONCLUSIONS: The regression analysis showed that, for the women in this study, the greater the student's civic-mindedness, the more favorable her attitude toward practicing in a rural setting. Additionally, the stronger the student's plan to practice family medicine, the more favorable her attitude toward eventual rural practice was. Lastly, the student's civic-mindedness influenced the predictive value of having a plan to practice family medicine.

Investigating Physicians' Adoption of Telemedicine in Romania Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).

This study investigates Romanian physicians' acceptance of telemedicine using the Technology Acceptance Model. We analyzed 1093 responses to an online survey distributed nationwide to physicians via email by the National Authority of Quality Management in Health, employing the partial least squares algorithm to estimate the relationship between the behavioral intention to adopt telemedicine and its potential determinants. Our findings reveal that the model accounts for 84.6% of the variance in behavioral intention to use telemedicine. Among the two constructs of the TAM model, perceived usefulness is a stronger predictor of behavioral intention than perceived ease of use. Additionally, subjective norms positively and significantly influence physicians' intention to use telemedicine and their perception of its usefulness. Furthermore, perceived incentives and accessibility to medical records also positively impact the behavioral intention to use telemedicine.

Patched but Still Leaky: An Update on the Pipeline for Women in Gastroenterology.

BACKGROUND: Women remain underrepresented in gastroenterology (GI). Studies have identified that a lack of formal mentorship for women contributes to this underrepresentation. While many GI divisions have adopted models for supporting GI fellows and faculty, there is a gap in our knowledge regarding mentorship options for internal medicine (IM) residents interested in GI. AIMS: To evaluate representation of women at each level of their career (resident, fellow, and attending) and examine trends in representation of women in GI compared to other IM subspecialties. METHODS: We analyzed AAMC Physician Specialty Data Reports to compare gender representation and growth of women representation across all IM subspecialties and residencies from 2007 to 2021. RESULTS: In 2021, 44.3% of IM residents, 37.8% of GI fellows, and 19.7% of actively practicing attending gastroenterologists were women. Since 2007, GI comprised significantly lower proportions of women attendings except for cardiology, and lower representation in fellows, except for cardiology and nephrology, than other IM subspecialties (p < 0.001). There was a consistently higher proportion of women GI fellows than attendings over the past 14 years (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: GI has among the lowest representation of women at each career level compared to other IM subspecialties. Given the previously reported preference of gender congruent mentoring, the underrepresentation of senior academic gastroenterologists who are women may be a contributing factor to lower proportions of women trainees choosing to pursue GI.

Thriving among Pakistani physicians: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Burnout among physicians negatively impacts the quality of patient care and provider's mental health. While many studies have evaluated burnout, factors associated with physician thriving are not well-defined. This study involved a qualitative exploration of thriving and career satisfaction among physicians in Pakistan. METHODS: A snowball sampling technique was used to recruit participants who completed a measure of job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and burnout between December 2022 and February 2023. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore factors associated with burnout and thriving. Participants were physicians working in public and private hospitals in North Punjab. RESULTS: Twenty-four physicians were interviewed. Six themes emerged that might help to explain factors involved in thriving: patient's affirmation, serving humanity, social support, spiritual connection, occupational prestige, and activities outside of work. Two themes were identified as challenges to thriving: excessive workload and lack of resources. CONCLUSION: Improving the well-being of primary care practitioners requires a multi-modal approach, which includes cultivating intrinsic virtues, such as resilience and spiritual resources, as well as improving social support and the workplace environment.