Clinical Assessment of Preemptive Analgesia on Success of Pulpal Anesthesia and Postendodontic Pain in Children with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Comparative Study.

Introduction: Optimal pain management of symptomatic pulpitis in formative years goes a long way in developing a positive dental attitude. Efforts should be made to increase the success of anesthesia, thus diminishing negative dental experiences. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of preemptive analgesia on the success of pulpal anesthesia following inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in children with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and on reducing postendodontic pain. Materials and methods: The research design was an in vivo, three-group, parallel, quadruple-blind study. A total of 75 patients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups-group I: ibuprofen, group II: combination of ibuprofen and paracetamol, and group III: multivitamin (placebo). Premedication was given 45 minutes before treatment, and patients received IANB in a standardized manner. Pain during pulpectomy was recorded using the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scale and postoperatively using Wong-Baker's pain rating scale (WBPRS) at 4, 12, and 24 hours. Success was measured if the pain felt was of no or mild intensity. Results: Success of IANB was 64% for ibuprofen, 72% for the combination group, and 40% for the placebo group, with no statistically significant difference between all groups (p = 0.06) on the FLACC scale. At 4 hours postoperatively, a significant difference (p = 0.02) was found among groups with more children experiencing no or mild pain in groups I and II and the highest number of rescue medications taken by the placebo group. Conclusion: Ibuprofen and a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen as preemptive analgesics had no significant effect on the success rate of IANB, although it was effective in reducing pain at 4 hours postoperatively. How to cite this article: Gori NA, Patel MC, Bhatt RK, et al. Clinical Assessment of Preemptive Analgesia on Success of Pulpal Anesthesia and Postendodontic Pain in Children with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(1):72-78.

Analyzing the application of dezocine combined with psychological care in the postoperative pain management of patients with hemifacial spasm.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the application of Dezocine combined with psychological care in the postoperative pain management. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. A total of 186 HFS patients who underwent Microvascular Decompression (MVD) at First People's Hospital of Zunyi between January 2020 and January 2022 were selected as the study subjects. Patients were divided into two groups based on different treatment interventions. The control group (n = 93) received routine perioperative care without preemptive analgesia, while the observation group (n = 93) received preemptive analgesia and combined psychological care on the basis of the control group's intervention. RESULTS: At 30 min post-laryngeal mask removal (T3), no significant difference in Ramsay Sedation Scale scores existed between control and observation groups (p > 0.05). The observation group showed significantly lower RSS scores at immediate mask removal (T2) and VAS scores at T3 compared to controls (p < 0.05). Following intervention, the observation group had notably lower SAS and SDS scores than controls (p < 0.05). Baseline (T0) and 5 min pre-removal (T1) exhibited no significant differences in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) values between groups (p > 0.05). However, at T2 and T3, the observation group displayed significantly lower MAP and HR values than controls (p < 0.05). No significant differences in pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) values existed between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to standard perioperative care alone, Dezocine combined with preemptive analgesia and psychological care effectively reduces postoperative pain during the awakening period, lowers the risk of immediate extubation-related agitation, and maintains stable hemodynamics in the postoperative period.

Comparing the Analgesic Effects Between the Pre- and Post-costal Cartilage Harvest Cohorts Using Ultrasound-Guided Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Children with Microtia Undergoing Auricular Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Pain following costal cartilage harvest surgery is the most common complaint of auricular reconstruction (AR). Anesthesiologists are continuously searching for an effective postoperative pain control method. METHODS: This study was conducted from 10 April 2022 to 10 June 2022. Sixty children undergoing AR using costal cartilage were randomly assigned to either a serratus anterior plane block performed before costal cartilage harvest (SAPB-pre-cohort; n = 30) or the SAPB-post-cohort (Post-costal cartilage Harvest Cohort: n = 30). The primary endpoint measures were the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores of the chest and ear pain degrees recorded at 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h after surgery. Intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic dosages, sufentanil consumption and rescue analgesia consumption during the first 24 h post-operation, cough score during extubation, extubation agitation score, length of stay, the extubation time, first ambulatory time, analgesia duration, and opioid-related adverse effects and SAPB-related adverse effects were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The rest and coughing NRS scores were significantly reduced in the SAPB-pre-cohort 6 and 12 h post-operation in comparison with the SAPB-post-cohort (rest 6 h p = 0.002, others p < 0.001). No significant difference in the NRS ear scores existed between the two cohorts (p > 0.05). The use of propofol and remifentanil for general anesthesia during the SAPB-pre-procedure was significantly reduced compared to the SAPB-post-group, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). Sufentanil consumption and rescue analgesia consumption were significantly reduced in the SAPB-pre-cohort (p = 0.001, p = 0.033). The extubation time and first ambulatory time were markedly shorter in the SAPB-pre-cohort (all p < 0.001). Analgesia duration was markedly longer in the SAPB-pre-cohort (p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in the cough score during extubation, extubation agitation score, length of stay between the two cohorts (all p > 0.05). Opioid-related adverse effects occurred more in the SAPB-post-cohort, while there was no statistical significance (16.7 vs. 36.7%; p = 0.082). There were no blockade-related complications observed in either cohort. CONCLUSION: The analgesic effect of the SAPB-pre-cohort was better than the SAPB-post-cohort suggesting both efficacy and feasibility of preemptive analgesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Superior analgesic efficacy of preemptive low-dose ketorolac compared with parecoxib after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a routine orthopedic procedure often associated with significant postoperative pain. Efficient pain management is paramount for patient recovery, with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) being a common choice. Nevertheless, the specific NSAID and its dosing regimen can have varying impacts on outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study spanning from January 2016 to December 2020, we analyzed patients who underwent TKA. These patients were divided into two groups: one receiving preemptive low-dose ketorolac (15 mg) followed by 15 mg every 6 h for 48 h, and the other receiving parecoxib (40 mg) every 12 h for the same duration. We assessed pain scores, opioid consumption, and monitored adverse events. RESULTS: Our findings reveal that ketorolac yielded superior results compared to parecoxib. Specifically, patients receiving ketorolac reported significantly lower Visual Numeric Rating Scale (VNRS) scores at 8- and 20-h post-surgery. This trend was further confirmed by linear mixed models (p = .0084). Additionally, ketorolac was associated with reduced opioid consumption during the initial 24 h. Importantly, the rates of adverse events were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The utilization of preemptive low-dose ketorolac demonstrates promising potential in bolstering pain control within the initial 24 h post-TKA, potentially reducing the need for opioids. However, further exploration is required to thoroughly assess its prolonged analgesic effects and safety across various surgical contexts. These investigations could provide invaluable insights for optimizing pain management protocols.

Preoperatively administered single dose of dexketoprofen decreases pain intensity on the first 5 days after craniotomy: A single-centre placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

Background and purpose: Headache attributed to craniotomy is an underestimated and under-treated condition. Previous studies confirmed the efficacy of preemptive analgesia with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. The aim of the present work was to test the hypothesis of whether a single preoperatively administered dose of dexketoprofen (DEX) has the potency to decrease postcraniotomy headache (PCH) as compared to placebo (PL). Patients and methods: This is a single-centre, randomized, PL-controlled trial comparing the effect of a single oral dose of 25 mg DEX to PL on the intensity of PCH. Patients undergoing craniotomy were randomly allocated to DEX and PL groups. Patients rated their actual and worst daily pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores during intrahospital treatment (0-5 days) and 30 and 90 days postoperatively. Results: Two hundred patients were included. DEX decreased the worst daily pain intensity in the first 24 h only; the 5-days cumulative score of actual pain was 9.7 ± 7.9 cm for the DEX group and 12.6 ± 10.5 cm for the PL group, respectively (p = 0.03). This difference disappeared in the late, 30-, and 90-day follow-up period. No differences in VAS scores could be detected in supra- and infratentorial cases among the DEX and PL groups. Conclusions: A single preoperative dose of 25 mg of DEX slightly decreases the intensity of PCH in the first 5 days after craniotomy but it does not have an effect on chronic headaches and postoperative analgesic requirements.

Efficacy and safety of perioperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for preemptive analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar spine disorders have become an increasingly common health problem in recent years. Modern clinical studies have shown that perioperative analgesia at certain doses can reduce postoperative pain by inhibiting the process of peripheral sensitization and central sensitization, which is also known as "preemptive analgesia," Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a class of drugs that achieve antipyretic and analgesic effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) and affecting the production of prostaglandins. Our meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative preemptive analgesia with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 12 clinical studies were included to assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative NSAIDs preemptive analgesia for lumbar spine surgery. RESULT: Twelve studies, including 845 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that perioperative receipt of NSAIDs for preemptive analgesia was effective and safe. Patient's postoperative morphine consumption (P < 0.05), visual analog scale (P < 0.05), and numerical rating scale (P < 0.05) were not statistically associated with postoperative complications (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that NSAIDs are effective and safe for preemptive analgesia in the perioperative period of lumbar spine surgery and that more and better quality RCTs and more in-depth studies of pain mechanics are still needed.

Preemptive caudal anesthesia on back pain after lumbar discectomy: a randomized and controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: In this randomized and prospective research, we aimed to relieve surgical and muscle-related pain early after lumbar disc operations with caudal preemptive analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation were included in this study. The caudal epidural injection was performed for all patients 20 min before surgery. The patients were divided into three groups. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or tramadol use were recorded. Pre-operative and post-operative pain was interpreted through a visual analog scale. RESULTS: There was a difference between the groups in all post-operative measurements (p < 0.05), between Group 1 and Group 3, and between Group 2 and Group 3. A statistical significance has been achieved between the groups at the 1st h, 2nd h, 4th h, and 24th h (p < 0.05). The difference between the pain intensities of the patients at the 24th h and the 1st week was statistically significant in Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). Evaluation of the effects of medical treatments reduced the severity of back pain and foot pain. CONCLUSION: The preemptive bupivacaine or in combination with methylprednisolone caudal injection is an effective and safe method to reduce post-operative pain and ameliorate functional capacity for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

OBJETIVO: En esta investigación prospectiva aleatorizada, nuestro objetivo fue aliviar el dolor quirúrgico y muscular temprano después de las operaciones de disco lumbar con analgesia preventiva caudal. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: en este estudio se incluyeron un total de 120 pacientes con hernia de disco lumbar de un solo nivel. La inyección epidural caudal se realizó para todos los pacientes 20 minutos antes de la cirugía. Los pacientes fueron divididos en tres grupos. Se registró el uso de AINE o tramadol. El dolor preoperatorio y postoperatorio se interpretó a través de una escala analógica visual. RESULTADOS: Hubo diferencia entre los grupos en todas las medidas postoperatorias (p < 0.05), entre el grupo 1 y el grupo 3, y entre el grupo 2 y el grupo 3. Se ha logrado una significación estadística entre los grupos a la 1a hora, 2a hora, 4 y 24 horas (p < 0.05). La diferencia entre las intensidades de dolor de los pacientes a la hora 24 y la primera semana fue estadísticamente significativa en los Grupos 1 y 2 (p < 0.05). La evaluación de los efectos de los tratamientos médicos redujo la gravedad del dolor de espalda y de pie. CONCLUSIÓN: La bupivacaína preventiva, o en combinación con la inyección caudal de metilprednisolona, es un método eficaz y seguro para reducir el dolor posoperatorio y mejorar la capacidad funcional para el tratamiento de la hernia de disco lumbar.

Effect of preoperative ibuprofen on pain after lower third molar removal: A randomized controlled trial.

Aim: The aim of the study is to predict the effect of preemptive analgesics in the third molar surgery and to analyze whether the number and frequency of postoperative analgesics are reduced following the administration of preemptive analgesics. Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out on 50 patients who reported to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for removal of their impacted mandibular third molar. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 25 patients each - Group A (test group) patients receiving ibuprofen (400 mg) half an hour before the surgery and placebo half an hour after surgery and the Group B (control group) patients receiving placebo half an hour before the surgery and ibuprofen (400 mg) half an hour after surgery. Both groups of patients will be instructed to avoid any drug but those prescribed (ibuprofen 400 mg SOS and rescue medication of tramadol 50 mg SOS) and not to seek any medical help elsewhere for postoperative problems. The pain was recorded using a visual analog scale. Results: Demographic data in the study show females (8%) and male (92%) patients. The average time taken for surgery was more in the control group (58.36 min) as compared to the test group (55.64 min) with no statistically significant difference. Values of pain score, medication score, number of rescue medication, and frequency at different time intervals (at baseline, after 3 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 7 days) are expressed in terms of mean and standard deviation, respectively, and the result shows the statistically significant difference for pain score at baseline and 7th-day time interval only. The distribution of different types of impaction and different types of elevation/odontotomy shows a significant association in test and control groups. Conclusion: Preoperative ibuprofen decreases the frequency and intensity of the pain. We believe that since this preoperative ibuprofen seems to be beneficial without any adverse effects, it may be used routinely in the 3rd molar surgeries and even in routine extraction.

Preemptive effects of etoricoxib, acetaminophen, nimesulide, and ibuprofen on postoperative pain management after single-implant surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence for pain control in preemptive analgesia (PA) after dental implant surgery, signaling the need for further studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PA in single dental implant surgeries (SDIS), seeking to identify among the etoricoxib (ETOR), ibuprofen (IBU), nimesulide (NIME), and acetaminophen (ACETA)], which one has the higher efficacy effectiveness in relieving postoperative pain and reducing the use of rescue medication compared to placebo. METHODS: In this triple-blind, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial, 135 individuals with a mean age of 57.6 years (±11.7), both genders, were randomly divided into five groups according to the test drug: I-PLACEBO; II-IBU (600 mg); III-NIME (100 mg); IV-ACETA (750 mg); and V-ETOR (90 mg). The occurrence, duration, and intensity of pain were analyzed using the Chi-square, Fisher's exact and ANOVA tests, and the generalized estimating equation models, when appropriate. RESULTS: Test drugs provided a reduction in postoperative pain scores and lower use of rescue medication when compared to placebo. The ETOR group presented significantly lower pain scores, when compared to other active treatments. The IBU group showed the highest mean number of rescue medication used. CONCLUSIONS: All test drugs provided a beneficial preemptive effect demonstrated by the reduced postoperative pain and reduced use of rescue medication. The ETOR group presented lower pain scores, and the IBU group showed the highest mean number of rescue medication used among the test groups.

Importance of preemptive analgesia and pain assessment as perceived by intensive care unit nurses.

Background: The importance and efficacy of Preemptive analgesia in reducing pain for patients undergoing painful procedures still debatable and seldom investigated. The aim of this study was to describe intensive care nurses' perception of the importance of pain assessment and Preemptive analgesia prior painful procedures in critical care settings in Jordan. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. The sample consisted of 300 registered nurses recruited from 22 intensive care units in Jordan. The data was gathered using a self-administered questionnaire. Results: The results showed that nurses considered pain assessment moderately and extremely important for surgical (n = 263, 87.7%), burn (n = 261, 87%), and trauma patients (n = 256, 85.3%). The majority of nurses rated pain assessment as moderately to extremely important for invasive line placement 80.3%, wound care 78.3%, and drain removal 69%. Nurses assessed the need for Preemptive analgesia more frequently before wound care 70.7%, and before invasive line placement 69.7%. Nurses perceived pain assessment for Preemptive analgesia as less priority for unconscious patients. Conclusion: Effective assessment and management of pain for critically ill patients is mandatory. Thus, it is important to improve nurses' knowledge regarding the Preemptive analgesia and its effects in relieving post-procedural pain in critically ill patient. It is recommended to ensure proper clinical training on how to assess critically ill patients and auditing system.

[Effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with imrecoxib on analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled study].

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with imrecoxib on analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A total of 160 patients with ACL injuries who met the selection criteria and were admitted between November 2020 and August 2021 were selected and divided into 4 groups according to the random number table method (n=40). Group A began to take imrecoxib 3 days before operation (100 mg/time, 2 times/day); group B began to take imrecoxib 1 day before operation (100 mg/time, 2 times/day); group C took 200 mg of imrecoxib 2 hours before operation (5 mL of water); and group D did not take any analgesic drugs before operation. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, constituent ratio of meniscal injuries with preoperative MRI grade 3, constituent ratio of cartilage injury Outerbridge grade 3, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the time of injury and at rest among 4 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, hospitalization stay, constituent ratio of perioperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 1, postoperative opioid dosage, and complications were recorded. The VAS scores were used to evaluate the degree of knee joint pain, including resting VAS scores before operation and at 6, 24, 48 hours, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, and walking, knee flexion, and night VAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. The knee injury and osteoarthritis score (KOOS) was used to evaluate postoperative quality of life and knee-related symptoms of patients, mainly including pain, symptoms, daily activities, sports and entertainment functions, knee-related quality of life (QOL); and the Lysholm score was used to evaluate knee joint function. Results: All patients were followed up 1 year. There was no significant difference in operation time, hospitalization time, or constituent ratio of perioperative ASA grade 1 among 4 groups (P>0.05); the dosage of opioids in groups A-C was significantly less than that in group D (P<0.05). Except for 1 case of postoperative fever in group B, no complications such as joint infection, deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities, or knee joint instability occurred in each group. The resting VAS scores of groups A-C at 6 and 24 hours after operation were lower than those of group D, and the score of group A at 6 hours after operation was lower than those of group C, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, the knee flexion VAS scores of groups A-C were lower than those of group D, the walking VAS scores of groups A and B were lower than those of groups C and D, the differences were significant (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, the KOOS pain scores in groups A-C were higher than those in group D, there was significant difference between groups A, B and group D (P<0.05); the KOOS QOL scores in groups A-C were higher than that in group D, all showing significant differences (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups A-C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores and KOOS scores between the groups at other time points (P>0.05). And there was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the traditional analgesic scheme, applying the concept of preemptive analgesia with imrecoxib to manage the perioperative pain of ACL reconstruction can effectively reduce the early postoperative pain, reduce the dosage of opioids, and promote the early recovery of limb function.

Dexmedetomidine or Fentanyl, Which One Is Better as an Adjunct Drug in Epidural Anesthesia and Causes More Postoperative Pain Reduction? A Comparative Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objectives: This study compared dexmedetomidine to fentanyl as an adjunct to ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing femoral neck fracture surgery. Methods: A total of 56 patients in two different groups with dexmedetomidine and fentanyl underwent the epidural anesthesia method by ropivacaine. This study compared the onset and duration of sensory block, duration of motor block, visual analog scale (VAS) analgesia, and sedation score. The VAS and hemodynamics (e.g., heart rate and mean arterial pressure) were measured every 5 to 15 minutes, then every 15 minutes to the end of the surgery, and then in the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours after surgery. Results: In the fentanyl group, the onset time of the sensory block was longer (P < 0.001), and the duration of the block was shorter than in the dexmedetomidine group (P = 0.045). In the fentanyl group, the onset time of motor block was longer than in the dexmedetomidine group (P < 0.001). The mean highest VAS score for each patient in the dexmedetomidine group was 4.9 ± 0.6, compared to the fentanyl group (5.8 ± 0.9), with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). The sedation score was higher from the 30th minute (P = 0.01) to the 120th minute (P = 0.04) in the patients of the dexmedetomidine group than in the fentanyl group. Side effects, such as dry mouth, hypotension, and bradycardia, were more common in the dexmedetomidine group, and nausea and vomiting were more common in the fentanyl group; however, there were no differences between the groups. There was no respiratory depression in both groups. Conclusions: This study presented that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in epidural anesthesia for orthopedic femoral fracture surgery shortens the onset time of sensory and motor block, increases analgesia length, and prolongs anesthesia. Sedation with dexmedetomidine is better than fentanyl, with fewer side effects, and more effective as preemptive analgesia.

Efficacy of Adding Acetaminophen to Preemptive Multimodal Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-blinded Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVE: Preemptive multimodal analgesia is a frequently utilized method for controlling pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). So far, no studies have specifically examined the efficacy of adding acetaminophen to preemptive multimodal analgesia in TKA. The current work aimed to assess the efficacy of adding acetaminophen to preemptive multimodal analgesia for clinical pain management after TKA. METHODS: This was a double-blinded randomized study including 80 cases randomized to the acetaminophen and control groups, respectively. The acetaminophen group was administered celecoxib at 400 mg, pregabalin at 150 mg, and acetaminophen at 300 mg 2 h before TKA. Control patients were administered celecoxib, pregabalin, and placebo. The primary outcome was postsurgical use of morphine hydrochloride for rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included the time to the initial rescue analgesia, postsurgical pain as determined by a visual analogue scale (VAS), functional recovery as reflected by the range of knee motion and ambulation distance, hospitalization duration, and complication rates. Continuous data with normal and skewed distributions were compared by the Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Categorical variables were compared by the Pearson's chi-squared test. RESULTS: The control and acetaminophen groups were comparable in postoperative 0-24 h morphine consumption (11.3 ± 6.5 mg vs 12.3 ± 7.7 mg, P = 0.445) and total morphine consumption (17.3 ± 10.1 mg vs 19.3 ± 9.4 mg, P = 0.242). Additionally, time to the initial rescue analgesia, postoperative VAS score at any time point, postoperative functional recovery of the knee, and hospitalization duration were similar in both groups. Both groups also had similar occurrence rates of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, adding acetaminophen to preoperative preemptive multimodal analgesia did not decrease postoperative morphine use or ameliorate pain relief. The efficacy of adding acetaminophen to preemptive multimodal analgesia in TKA need to be further explored in future studies.

Is coadministration of preemptive medications an effective strategy for reducing inflammatory clinical events and the need for rescue medication after mandibular third molar surgery? A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

This study aimed to evaluate the scientific evidence on the effect of preemptive drug coadministration (PDC) for relieving inflammatory events (pain, swelling, and trismus) in mandibular third molar surgery. A PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42022314546) was conducted according to the PRISMA guide. The searches were carried out in six primary databases and the gray literature. Studies not written in languages with the Latin alphabet (Roman) were excluded. Potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were screened for eligibility. Cochrane's Risk of Bias-2.0 (RoB) tool was assessed. A synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) based on a vote counting and an effect direction plot. Nine studies (low RoB) fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included for data analysis, with a total of 484 patients. PDC mostly involved corticosteroids (Cort) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). PDC of Cort and other drugs mainly reduced pain scores (6 and 12 h postoperatively) and swelling (48 h postoperatively). PDC of NSAIDs and other drugs mainly reduced pain scores at 6, 8, and 24 h follow-up; swelling and trismus intensity ameliorated at 48 h postoperatively. The most frequently prescribed rescue medication was paracetamol, dipyrone, and paracetamol plus codeine. Results from individual studies have shown reduced consumption of ingested rescue analgesics. In summary, the available evidence from clinical trials included in this SWiM suggests that PDC may provide benefits in reducing the severity of inflammatory outcomes related to mandibular third molar surgery, especially the pain scores in the first hours after surgery, and the rescue analgesic consumption during the postoperative period.

The Efficacy and Safety of Parecoxib Multimodal Preemptive Analgesia in Artificial Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain after artificial joint replacement is intense and remains an unsolved problem. Some studies have shown that parecoxib can provide better analgesia in postoperative multimodal analgesia, however, doubts arise about whether its multimodal preemptive analgesia can reduce postoperative pain. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of preoperative injection of parecoxib on postoperative pain in patients undergoing artificial joint replacement. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wangfang databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. The last search was in May 2022. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of efficacy and adverse reactions of intra-operative and postoperative injection of parecoxib in artificial joint replacement were collected. The primary outcome was postoperative visual analog scale scores and the secondary outcomes included cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of adverse reactions. Using the Cochrane systematic review method to screen the studies, evaluate the quality of the included studies, and extract feature information, RevMan 5.4 software performs a meta-analysis of the corresponding research indicators. RESULTS: In total, nine studies were involved in the meta-analysis with 667 patients. The trial and control group were given the same dose of parecoxib or placebo at the same time point before and after surgery. The results showed that compared with the control group, the trial group is associated with substantially reduced visual analog scale scores in 24, 48 h at rest (P < 0.05), visual analog scale scores in 24, 48, 72 h at movement (P < 0.05), dose of opioid need in trial group is notably lower than that in control group (P < 0.05), but shows no obvious effect on visual analog scale scores in 72 h at rest, and adverse events (P > 0.05). LIMITATIONS: The major limitation of this meta-analysis relates to some low-quality studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support parecoxib multimodal preemptive analgesia in reducing postoperative acute pain in hip and knee replacement patients, and reduces cumulative opioid consumption without increasing the risk of adverse drug events. Its multimodal preemptive analgesia is safe and effective in hip and knee replacement. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022379672.

The Interactions of Magnesium Sulfate and Cromoglycate in a Rat Model of Orofacial Pain; The Role of Magnesium on Mast Cell Degranulation in Neuroinflammation.

Mast cell degranulation impacts the development of pain and inflammation during tissue injury. We investigated the antinociceptive effect of a combination of cromoglycate and magnesium in the orofacial model of pain and the histological profile of the effect of magnesium in orofacial pain. In male Wistar rats, formalin (1.5%, 100 µL) was injected subcutaneously into the right upper lip of rats after cromoglycate and/or magnesium. Pain was measured as the total time spent on pain-related behavior. Toluidine blue staining was used to visualize mast cells under the light microscope. In the formalin test, in phase 1, magnesium antagonized the antinociceptive effect of cromoglycate, while in phase 2, it potentiated or inhibited its effect. Magnesium significantly reduced mast cell degranulation in the acute phase by about 23% and in the second phase by about 40%. Pearson's coefficient did not show a significant correlation between mast cell degranulation and pain under treatment with magnesium. The cromoglycate-magnesium sulfate combination may prevent the development of inflammatory orofacial pain. The effect of a combination of cromoglycate-magnesium sulfate depends on the nature of the pain and the individual effects of the drugs. Magnesium reduced orofacial inflammation in the periphery, and this effect did not significantly contribute to its analgesic effect.

Morphine prophylaxis alleviates pain in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an accepted minimal invasive procedure for the management of complications of portal hypertension. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the value of the preemptive administration of morphine, when compared with on-demand morphine, during TIPS. METHODS: The present study was a randomized control trial. A total of 49 patients were selected to receive 10 mg of morphine either before the TIPS procedure (group B, n= 26), or on demand when needed during the TIPS procedure (group A, n= 23). The patient's pain was scored using the visual analog scale (VAS) during the procedure. VAS, pain performance, HR, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure and SPO2 were recorded at four-time points: before the operation (T0), during the trans-hepatic puncture of the portal vein (T1), during the intrahepatic channel expansion (T2), and when the operation was finished (T3). The duration of the operation was also recorded. RESULTS: In group A, the proportion of severe pain at T1 was 4.3% (one case), two cases were combined with vagus reflex, and the proportion of severe pain at T2 was 65.2% (15 cases). No severe pain occurred in group B. The VAS score significantly decreased at T1, T2 and T3 in group B, when compared to group A (P< 0.05). HR, systolic pressure and diastolic pressure significantly decreased at T2 and T3 in group B, when compared to group A (P< 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of SPO2 (P> 0.05). CONCLUSION: Preemptive analgesia can effectively relieve severe pain during TIPS, improve patient comfort and compliance, ensure a routine procedure, and offer excellent safety, and is simple and effective.

Application of sequential multimodal analgesia before and after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Several analgesics have been applied under various protocols to control the moderate-to-severe postoperative pain caused by the surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar. However, a consensus on optimal pain management while minimizing side effects is yet to be reached. Methods: This multi-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential multimodal analgesia combined with postoperative zaltoprofen along with multiple preemptive analgesics. A total of 80 participants with bilateral impacted mandibular third molar from two hospitals were randomized into two groups. Two surgical extractions were performed at one-month intervals, and in a crossover design, celecoxib or tramadol/acetaminophen was administered before one extraction and placebo before the other extraction. Following extraction, all subjects took zaltoprofen for 5 days. The outcome measures included pain at specific times, time and intensity of the first pain onset after extraction, need of rescue drugs, and occurrence and frequency of side effects. Conclusions: This ongoing clinical trial was designed to provide evidence regarding a new protocol for effective postoperative pain management of a commonly performed surgical extraction. The results of this study will provide guidance to clinicians regarding the timing and combination of oral analgesics in various oral surgeries performed under local anesthesia. Trial registration: KCT0005450, registered on October 7, 2020.

Efficacy of Preemptive Analgesia on Tourniquet and Postoperative Pain Relief in Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

PURPOSE: Preemptive analgesia has been used to reduce postsurgery pain and improve patient satisfaction. The effectiveness of multimodal preemptive analgesia in open carpal tunnel release under local anesthetic with a tourniquet is still debated. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia on the postoperative tourniquet site and the surgical site. METHODS: A total of 44 patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups. An experimental group was given 300 mg of gabapentin, 200 mg of celecoxib, and 500 mg of acetaminophen 2 hours before surgery. Placebos were given to the control group. All surgeries were done under local anesthetic by a specialist hand surgeon. A tourniquet was inflated to the recommended pressure. The outcomes included the immediate postoperative tourniquet site pain scores, surgical site pain scores (at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery), and acetaminophen consumption in the first 48 hours. RESULTS: The immediate postoperative tourniquet site pain score in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the placebo group. Although the surgical site pain score in the experimental group was significantly lower than the placebo group at 1, 6, 12, and 18 hours after surgery, these differences were not clinically significant. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in surgical site pain score at 24 hours after surgery. The amount of acetaminophen consumed during the first 48 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal preemptive analgesia effectively reduced immediate postoperative pain at the tourniquet site in open carpal tunnel release. It also reduced postoperative acetaminophen consumption. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.