Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous Itepekimab Injection With an Autoinjector Device and Prefilled Syringe in Healthy Participants.

Itepekimab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-33, has demonstrated clinical utility in previous studies in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An autoinjector (AI) has been developed for administering itepekimab to facilitate further development. This study compared pharmacokinetics of single 300-mg itepekimab subcutaneous administration via an AI versus a prefilled syringe (PFS). Of 90 healthy volunteers enrolled in this Phase 1, parallel-design, randomized study and stratified by body weight (50 to <70 kg, ≥70 to <80 kg, ≥80 to 100 kg) and injection site (abdomen, thigh, or arm), 84 completed the study. Systemic exposure of itepekimab was similar for both groups. Point estimates for geometric mean ratios of pharmacokinetic parameters for AI versus PFS groups were 1.01 for maximum serum concentration, 1.06 for area under the serum concentration-time curve to the last quantifiable concentration, and 1.04 for area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity. The exposure was similar for both devices in each body weight and injection site subgroup. Overall, systemic exposure of 300-mg single-dose itepekimab in healthy participants was comparable when administered subcutaneously via an AI device and PFS, with an acceptable safety profile in both device groups.

Update on Retinal Drug Safety: Proceedings of the ASRS ReST Committee Webinar Part 1.

Purpose: To review the first Research and Safety in Therapeutics (ReST) Committee webinar and summarize the most current recommendations regarding diagnosis and management. Methods: The ReST Committee is comprised of members of the American Society of Retina Surgeons (ASRS). At regular internal meetings, safety issue reports from the website are reviewed. A webinar series was started in 2021 to update members on multiple relevant potential safety events. Results: Topics reviewed in the webinar included pentosan polysulfate sodium (Elmiron) maculopathy, intraocular pressure elevation reported with the aflibercept prefilled syringe (PFS), and brolucizumab-associated inflammation with occlusive retinal vasculitis. Retinal toxicity related to intraoperative medications was reviewed, including hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis after intraocular vancomycin, dilution errors with intravitreal aminoglycosides, inadvertent overdoses of cefuroxime after cataract surgery, and toxic posterior segment syndrome after dropless cataract surgery using compounded triamcinolone-moxifloxacin. Indocyanine green toxicity has been reported after its use as an adjuvant during macular hole surgery. Conclusions: The past decade has seen advances in retinal pharmaceuticals and drug-delivery devices. The ASRS ReST Committee collects data from its website reporting system to inform members about up-to-date pharmaceutical and device safety concerns. Recently, a webinar was used to inform members of pigmentary maculopathy associated with pentosan polysulfate sodium, safety regarding the aflibercept PFS, intraocular inflammation and occlusive retinal vasculitis secondary to brolucizumab, and retinal toxicity from intraoperative ocular medications.

Impact of dimensional variability of primary packaging materials on the break-loose and gliding forces of prefilled syringes.

A prefilled syringe (PFS) should be able to be adequately and consistently extruded during injection for optimal safe drug delivery and accurate dosing. To facilitate appropriate break-loose and gliding forces (BLGF) required during injection, certain primary packaging materials (PPM) such as the syringe barrel and plunger are usually coated with silicone oil, which acts as a lubricant. Due to its direct contact with drug, silicone oil can increase the number of particles in the syringe, which could lead to adverse interactions. Compliance with regulatory defined silicone oil quantities in certain drug products, such as ophthalmic, presents a trade-off with the necessity for desirable low and consistent BLGF. In addition to its siliconization, the dimensional accuracy of PPM has an important role in controlling BLGF. The dimensions of PPM are individualized depending on the product and its design and have certain tolerances that must be met during manufacturing. Most studies on ophthalmic focused on the adverse interactions between silicone oil and the drug. To the authors' knowledge, there have been no public studies so far that have investigated the impact of the dimensional variability of PPM on the BLGF in ophthalmic PFS. In this study, we applied advanced optical shaft and tactile measuring technologies to investigate this impact. The syringes investigated, were first sampled during aseptic production, and tested for BLGF. Subsequently, defined dimensions of PPM were measured individually. The results showed that the dimensional variability of PPM can have a negative impact on the BLGF, despite their conformity to specifications, which indicates that the currently available market quality of PPM is improvable for critical drug products such as ophthalmic. This study could serve as an approach to define product-specific requirements for primary packaging combinations and thus appropriate specifications based on data during the development stage of drug products.

Patient preference after switching guselkumab from prefilled syringe to an autoinjection pen in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients.

BACKGROUND: We assessed pain, acceptability, patient preference, and tolerability of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis after switching guselkumab from a prefilled syringe to One-Press autoinjector pen. METHODS: Patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated for at least 6 months with guselkumab syringe were recruited from Jan 2019 to Dec 2022. Gender, age, diagnosis, self-administration, and pain perception of guselkumab prefilled syringe were recorded. At the first visit, patients completed a post-auto-injection syringe questionnaire before starting auto-injection pen administration. After 2 and 6 months of guselkumab self-injection using the One-Press autoinjector pen, patient experience, adherence, preference, pain, and safety of each administration were assessed using post-guselkumab by One-Press autoinjector pen questionnaire. RESULTS: 40 patients [psoriasis n=34, psoriatic arthritis n=6] were included. All patients self-administered guselkumab by One-Press autoinjector pen. Pain at the injection site was significantly reduced with the use of the One-Press autoinjector pen. All patients considered that using One-Press autoinjector pen was easier than the syringe, 98% chose the pen as their preferred delivery system. CONCLUSION: The One-Press autoinjector pen for guselkumab administration is presented as a preferred option, with a high satisfaction and less painful compared to the administration of guselkumab in a prefilled syringe.

Vaccine preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference of prefilled syringes versus RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution: randomized, time and motion study.

AIM: The current study compared preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference for a prefilled syringe (PFS) versus two RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution (VRR1 and VRR2) in a randomized, single-blinded time and motion study. METHODS: Pharmacists, nurses, and pharmacy technicians were randomized to a preparation sequence of the three vaccines. Participants read instructions, then consecutively prepared the three vaccines with a 3-5-min washout period in between. Preparations were video recorded and reviewed by a trained pharmacist for preparation time and errors using predefined, vaccine-specific checklists. Participant demographics, satisfaction with vaccine preparation, and vaccine preference were recorded. Within-subjects analysis of variance was used to compare preparation time. Mixed-effects Poisson and ordered logistic regression models were used to compare the number of preparation errors and satisfaction scores, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-three pharmacists (60%), nurses (35%), and pharmacy technicians (5%) participated at four sites in the United States. The least squares mean preparation time per dose for PFS was 141.8 s (95% CI = 156.8-126.7; p <.0001) faster than for VRR1, 103.6 s (95% CI = 118.7-88.5; p <.0001) faster than for VRR2, and 122.7 s (95% CI = 134.2-111.2; p <.0001) faster than the pooled VRRs. Overall satisfaction (combined "Very" and "Extremely") was 87.3% for PFS, 28.6% for VRR1, and 47.6% for VRR2. Most participants (81.0%) preferred the PFS vaccine. LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by the inability to completely blind observers. To minimize the effects of order, we utilized a 3-sequence block design; however, the order in which the vaccines were prepared may have affected outcomes. Participants were assessed once, whereas if repeated preparations were performed there may have been trained efficiencies gained for each vaccine. CONCLUSION: PFS vaccines can greatly simplify the vaccine preparation process, allowing administrators to prepare almost four times more doses per hour than with vial and syringe systems.

Excipient and Packaging Material Impact on Glass and Polymer-Based Prefilled Syringe Functionality.

Compared to glass prefilled syringes (PFSs), cyclic olefin polymer (COP) PFS showed more consistent and predictable extrusion forces when exposed to a variety of excipient combinations (buffers, tonicity agents, and surfactants) at various accelerated storage conditions. Furthermore, COP PFSs also showed significantly less variance in extrusion forces within each individual stroke, which is critical for precision applications. Observed performance differences can be explained by fundamental differences in the stability and homogeneity of the primary packaging materials (i.e., COP vs siliconized glass) and their physicochemical interactions with excipients.

Clinical Bridging From Prefilled Syringe to On-body Injector for Risankizumab in Crohn's Disease.

PURPOSE: This article describes the clinical development bridging strategy and key data to support the marketing application of the risankizumab on-body injection (OBI) system for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD), even though the OBI was not evaluated directly in the pivotal Phase III studies in CD. METHODS: Three studies were conducted as part of the clinical bridging strategy. The pilot pharmacokinetics (PK) study was a Phase I, single-dose, 4-arm, open-label, randomized, parallel-group exploratory PK and tolerability study that assessed the effect of rate and volume of administration on the bioavailability (BA) of risankizumab and the extent of injection site-related pain after subcutaneous (SC) administration in healthy subjects. The pivotal BA/bioequivalence (BE) study was a relative BA/BE bridging study in healthy subjects to assess the relative BA of the to-be-marketed risankizumab OBI compared with the prefilled syringe (PFS) used in the Phase III CD studies. The OBI adhesive study was a randomized, open-label, non-drug interventional study in healthy subjects to assess the OBI adhesive effectiveness and skin tolerability at 2 different locations (abdomen and upper thigh) over different periods of time (5 and 30 minutes). FINDINGS: The pilot PK study showed that risankizumab exposures were similar across different rates/volumes of SC administration in healthy subjects, thereby supporting further development of the OBI. Second, a pivotal BA/BE study showed comparability between the OBI and Phase III PFS with bioequivalent risankizumab AUCs and no clinically meaningful difference for Cmax based on the wide therapeutic window of risankizumab. In both studies, no new safety risks were identified. No impact of immunogenicity on PK profile or safety was observed for the OBI. Third, an adhesive OBI (without risankizumab) study showed that there were no differences in adhesion/skin tolerability observed over time (up to 30 minutes) or for location of adhesion, and the OBI device adhesion was well tolerated at both the abdomen and thigh locations. IMPLICATIONS: These results supported the risankizumab OBI presentation approval in CD.

A Review of Recent FDA-Approved Biologic-Device Combination Products.

With the remarkably strong growth of the biopharmaceutical market, an increasing demand for self-administration and rising competitions attract substantial interest to the biologic-device combination products. The ease-of-use of biologic-device combination products can minimize dosing error, improve patient compliance and add value to the life-cycle management of biological products. As listed in the purple book issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a total of 98 brand biologic-device combination products have been approved with Biologic License Application from January 2000 to August 2023, where this review mainly focused on 63 products containing neither insulin nor vaccine. Prefilled syringes (PFS) and autoinjectors are the most widely adopted devices, whereas innovative modifications like needle safety guard and dual-chamber design and novel devices like on-body injector also emerged as promising presentations. All 16 insulin products employ pen injectors, while all 19 vaccine products are delivered by a PFS. This review provides a systematic summary of FDA-approved biologic-device combination products regarding their device configurations, routes of administration, formulations, instructions for use, etc. In addition, challenges and opportunities associated with biologic-device compatibility, regulatory complexity, and smart connected devices are also discussed. It is believed that evolving technologies will definitely move the boundaries of biologic-device combination product development even further.

Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation.

Purpose: To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS). Methods: Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of the Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich and the Technical University Munich, Germany, were screened for documentation of TVL after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. The observation period included two full months prior to the introduction of the novel PFS and two months afterwards. TVL was defined as loss of perception of hand motion for a duration of >30 s. Results: Over a period of four months, 1720 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were administered in 672 patients. There were 842 injections with the old VS, and 878 injections using the novel PFS. Using the VS, TVL was noted during two injections (0.24%) in two patients, as compared to 11 cases of TVL (1.25%) in 10 patients with the PFS (p = 0.015). Using the PFS, patients had a 5.3-fold risk of TVL as compared to the VS (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.2-24.1; p = 0.0298). Conclusion: There was a more than five-fold risk of TVL using the novel pre-filled aflibercept syringe as compared to the established vial system. During informed consent, this risk should be discussed.

Effect of Prefilled vs Vial-Drawn Syringes on Sustained Increases in Intraocular Pressure in Patients Treated With Aflibercept.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of syringe type on developing sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) increases. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients in a single academic center receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections from 2012 to 2022 for various indications. Patients were grouped by anti-VEGF treatment of either vial-drawn or prefilled syringe delivery. Trends in IOP were recorded for 1 year after treatment began. Development of sustained IOP increase, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma was recorded. Sustained IOP increase was defined as ≥5 mm Hg above baseline for at least 4 weeks. Results: Of 257 total patients, 6 (2.3%) developed sustained IOP increases throughout the study's duration. No significant differences were noted with respect to prefilled versus vial-drawn syringe status on the development of sustained IOP increases or incident glaucoma (IOP: 1.8% vs 2.7%, respectively, P = .65; glaucoma: 0.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, P = .14). Patients treated with prefilled syringes were significantly less likely to develop ocular hypertension (2.8% vs 8.8%, P < .05). Conclusions: This study found that aflibercept intravitreal injection with prefilled syringes was not associated with a significant increase in IOP-related adverse effects when compared with those treated with vial-drawn syringes.

Comprehensive Assessment of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Ligelizumab in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria to Optimize Its Subcutaneous Delivery System.

Ligelizumab is a highly potent, humanized IgG1, anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. To explore its optimal subcutaneous delivery, the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and tolerability of ligelizumab from two Phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers (HVs) and four Phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) were assessed. Using different injection volumes or durations of a liquid-in-vial (LIVI) formulation or different formulations (LIVI vs. prefilled syringe (PFS)), single-dose ligelizumab showed comparable PK exposure in HVs. Steady-state exposure of ligelizumab was also comparable between LIVI and PFS following multiple dosing in CSU patients. The total IgE level (a PD marker) and tolerability were similar between the two formulations in both HVs and patients. Furthermore, the PK, total IgE, and tolerability were comparable for PFS administered either by patients or healthcare providers (HCPs). Collective evidence demonstrated that the injection duration or volume, formulation, or administrator had no apparent impact on the PK, PD, and tolerability of ligelizumab, supporting no clinically relevant difference between LIVI and PFS, and that PFS can be administered by patients or HCPs. This report provides a comprehensive assessment based on data of multiple clinical endpoints from both HVs and patients to inform formulation development and commercial use of a monoclonal antibody.

Impact of Prefilled Syringes and Masking on Postintravitreal Injection Endophthalmitis.

Purpose: To compare rates of endophthalmitis (1) following intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapies with glass-vial preparation (GVP) vs prefilled syringes (PFS) and (2) before and after masking protocols were implemented. Methods: Medical records within a multicenter retina practice in Houston, Texas, from January 2015 to August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was rate of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection. Results: A total of 307 349 injections were performed during the study period and 101 cases of endophthalmitis were identified (0.033%). PFS use was associated with a decreased risk of endophthalmitis (relative risk [RR], 0.320; 95% CI, 0.198-0.518, P < .001); 54 cases of endophthalmitis occurred in the GVP group of aflibercept and ranibizumab (0.052%) compared with 24 in the PFS group (0.017%). There was no difference in the endophthalmitis rates with or without universal masking (RR, 0.953; 95% CI 0.616-1.473, P = .91). Discussion: PFS use was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of endophthalmitis while the use of surgical face masks did not appear to significantly impact the rate of endophthalmitis.

Stopper Movement and Headspace (Air Bubble Size) Limitations for 2.25 mL Prefilled Syringe.

The sterile barrier is one of the most important aspects of the container closure integrity (CCI) for a prefilled syringe (PFS or syringe). This crucial barrier enables the protection of the syringe contents from contamination. The plunger stopper (stopper) is naturally in a stationary position that is controlled by the static friction between the plunger stopper and the syringe barrel wall. When an applied force is greater than the static friction, which is commonly known as the break-loose force, the plunger stopper will move. In such conditions, the stopper movement can further be increased if an air bubble (AB) is introduced between the liquid fill in the syringe and the stopper during the stoppering process. This additional movement can occur when the pressure differential between the gaseous headspace inside the syringe and the external atmosphere is large enough that the force exerted on the stopper exceeds the break-loose force of the syringe. This can occur during altitude or temperature changes incurred during aerial or mountainous transport. This article, therefore, discusses the relationship between stopper movement and initial headspace (air bubble size/ABS) in a 2.25 mL Type I glass syringe using theoretical and empirical approaches. The results showed the maximum initial headspace needed to enable CCI at specified altitudes and plunger stopper movements for the syringe-plunger stopper combination used in the study. Empirical data also indicated that CCI can be maintained for this syringe-plunger stopper combination with up to 9.0 mm initial headspace at altitudes up to 17,000 feet.

Handling injectable medications in anaesthesia: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists.

Peri-operative medication safety is complex. Avoidance of medication errors is both system- and practitioner-based, and many departments within the hospital contribute to safe and effective systems. For the individual anaesthetist, drawing up, labelling and then the correct administration of medications are key components in a patient's peri-operative journey. These guidelines aim to provide pragmatic safety steps for the practitioner and other individuals within the operative environment, as well as short- to long-term goals for development of a collaborative approach to reducing errors. The aim is that they will be used as a basis for instilling good practice.

Characterizing Silicone Oil-Induced Protein Aggregation with Stimulated Raman Scattering Imaging.

Particles in biopharmaceutical products present high risks due to their detrimental impacts on product quality and safety. Identification and quantification of particles in drug products are important to understand particle formation mechanisms, which can help develop control strategies for particle formation during the formulation development and manufacturing process. However, existing analytical techniques such as microflow imaging and light obscuration measurement lack the sensitivity and resolution to detect particles with sizes smaller than 2 µm. More importantly, these techniques are not able to provide chemical information to determine particle composition. In this work, we overcome these challenges by applying the stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy technique to monitor the C-H Raman stretching modes of the proteinaceous particles and silicone oil droplets formed in the prefilled syringe barrel. By comparing the relative signal intensity and spectral features of each component, most particles can be classified as protein-silicone oil aggregates. We further show that morphological features are poor indicators of particle composition. Our method has the capability to quantify aggregation in protein therapeutics with chemical and spatial information in a label-free manner, potentially allowing high throughput screening or investigation of aggregation mechanisms.

Two-Way Crossover Phase 1 Bioequivalence and Safety Studies in Healthy Adults for a Ready-to-Use, Room-Temperature, Liquid-Stable Glucagon Administered by Autoinjector, Prefilled Syringe, or Vial and Syringe.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate bioequivalence and safety for a ready-to-use room-temperature liquid-stable glucagon administered subcutaneously (SC) through a glucagon autoinjector (GAI) or a glucagon vial and syringe kit (GVS), versus a glucagon prefilled syringe (G-PFS). METHODS: Healthy adults (N = 32) were randomly assigned to receive 1-mg glucagon as GAI or G-PFS, and then as the alternative three to seven days later. Other healthy adults (N = 40) were randomly assigned to receive 1-mg glucagon as GVS or G-PFS, and then as the alternative two days later. Samples for plasma glucagon were obtained through 240 minutes after glucagon injection. Bioequivalence was declared when the geometric mean estimate ratio of the area under-the-concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 240 minutes (AUC0-240) and maximum concentration (Cmax) for plasma glucagon between treatment groups was contained within the bounds of 80% and 125%. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC0-240 and Cmax geometric mean ratios for G-PFS to GAI and GVS to G-PFS were contained within the bounds 80% to 125% (G-PFS:GAI AUC0-240 95.05%, 119.67% and Cmax 88.01%, 120.24%; GVS:G-PFS AUC0-240 87.39%, 100.66% and Cmax 89.08%, 106.08%). At least one AE occurred in 15.6% (5/32) participants with GAI, 25% (18/72) with G-PFS, and 32.5% (13/40) with GVS. Sixty-nine of 73 (94.5%) AEs were mild, and none were serious. Nausea was the most common (33/73 [45%]). CONCLUSIONS: Bioequivalence and safety were established after 1 mg of this ready-to-use room-temperature liquid-stable glucagon, administered SC to healthy adults, by autoinjector, prefilled syringe, or vial and syringe kit.

Effect of Various Silicone Oil And Tungsten Levels on the Stability of a Monoclonal Antibody in Nine Commercially Available Prefilled Syringes.

Prefilled syringes are widely used as a primary container for therapeutic proteins because they are more convenient than glass vials. The stability of biologic molecules can be affected by different syringe materials and techniques, such as silicone oil levels and coating method, amount of tungsten remaining in the glass barrel after using a tungsten pin to create the needle hole, and end of the syringe, which can be Luer locked or pre-staked with a needle. We investigated the impact of these parameters by using a monoclonal antibody to collect the antibody's stability profile and the prefilled syringes' functionality data. Silicone oil levels had no impact on aggregation levels, and particle counts were lowest for silicone oil-free syringes. Functionality performance was similar and did not change throughout all stability time points for all syringe configurations. The break-loose force for Ompi syringes was initially lower and increased over time to align with those of the other configurations, all of which remained well below 25 N. Tungsten contaminants and agitation stress from shipping studies did not impact quality attributes. This work can help guide the development of similar products in prefilled syringes to ensure selection of the primary container that provides adequate stability for the protein, as well as maintain the desired functionality features over the shelf life of the drug product.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-arm parallel study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of AVT02 administered subcutaneously via prefilled syringe or autoinjector in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: AVT02 is an adalimumab biosimilar, with bioequivalence previously established along with clinical similarity. This study assessed the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of a single dose of 100 mg/mL AVT02 administered via prefilled syringe (PFS) or autoinjector (AI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group study, healthy adults were randomized 1:1 to receive one 40 mg (100 mg/mL) dose of AVT02 subcutaneously via PFS (N = 102) or AI (N = 105). Primary PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf) were evaluated up to Day 64 of the study. Secondary PK parameters, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity were also assessed. RESULTS: The 90% CIs for the ratio of geometric least squares means were contained within the pre-specified 80-125% equivalence margins for the primary PK parameters, demonstrating bioequivalence of AVT02 when administered by PFS or AI. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between the two groups, with a low frequency of injection site reactions observed. Immunogenicity profiles were also similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Bioequivalence was demonstrated for a single dose of AVT02 administered via PFS or AI. These results will help to increase availability of devices for patients, enabling treatment choice and flexibility.

Etanercept is Effective and Halts Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Final Results from a German Non-interventional Study (PRERA).

INTRODUCTION: Etanercept (ETN) has been shown to slow radiographic progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in clinical trials. This real-world, non-interventional study assessed radiographic progression in patients with RA or PsA treated with ETN for ≤ 36 months in outpatient care in Germany (NCT01623752). METHODS: Patients with RA or PsA attended ≤ 10 visits across two study phases (phase 1: seven visits, baseline to month 18; phase 2: three visits until month 36). Radiographs were taken at baseline (Rx1), months 12-18 (Rx2), and/or months 30-36 (Rx3). Historic radiographs (Rx0) taken 12-48 months pre-baseline were also evaluated (if available). The primary endpoint was the change in modified total Sharp score (mTSS). The erosion score (ES) and joint space narrowing score (JSN) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 1821 patients were enrolled (RA: n = 1378; PsA: n = 440). In patients with Rx1 and Rx2 (RA: n = 511; PsA: n = 167), the mean mTSS remained stable for both disease groups, and the annualized median change in mTSS was 0. In patients with Rx0, Rx1, and Rx2 (RA: n = 180; PsA: n = 47), annualized radiographic progression in mTSS, ES, and JSN was larger in the pre-ETN treatment phase than during ETN treatment in both disease groups. The percentage of patients with radiographic non-progression was higher during ETN treatment versus pre-ETN. Improvement in clinical disease activity and patient-reported outcomes was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first real-world, non-interventional study to report systematically collected radiographic data in a large cohort of patients with RA or PsA under treatment with a biologic. In patients with available radiographic data, mean radiographic progression was lower and the proportion of patients without progression was greater during ETN treatment than in the pre-ETN period.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are diseases in which inflammation can lead to damage in the joints. X-ray images can show whether the disease gets worse; this is called radiographic progression. Etanercept is a drug that acts on the body's immune system and can reduce inflammation in the joints. In clinical studies, radiographic progression was slower in people with RA or PsA who received etanercept compared with people who received another drug called methotrexate. In this study, we wanted to know how radiographic progression changes in people in Germany who receive etanercept as part of their routine treatment. A total of 1378 people with RA and 440 people with PsA received etanercept for up to 36 months. We observed little to no radiographic progression for most people during the study. Radiographic progression was worse before people started taking etanercept. More people had no radiographic progression while taking etanercept compared with before they started treatment. The proportion of people who responded to treatment with etanercept as measured by the number of painful joints increased throughout the study. Overall, people felt that their health improved after they started taking etanercept.This was the first large study in which we investigated how radiographic progression changes when people with RA or PsA start taking etanercept as part of their routine treatment. We observed a slowing or halting of radiographic progression in most people and an improvement in their overall health.