Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a novel web-based sleep apnea management platform.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent yet underdiagnosed disorder affecting US military Veterans. The Remote Veterans Apnea Management Platform (REVAMP) is a web-based OSA management program created to improve access to care. REVAMP was launched within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in July 2017, with variable patient recruitment rates (from 0 to 573 patients per site) at the first 10 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (Wave-1 sites). This study aimed to examine the contextual circumstances surrounding the implementation of REVAMP from the provider perspective to inform strategies to increase its uptake at future rollout sites. METHODS: A purposive sample of REVAMP site leaders from the Wave-1 sites was recruited with additional staff members being solicited as well. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Two independent coders reviewed individual transcripts using content analysis to identify emerging themes. RESULTS: Fifteen individuals from Wave-1 sites were interviewed. Implementation of REVAMP was facilitated by the presence of leadership support, staff, and time dedicated to REVAMP, and perceived usefulness of REVAMP by staff as well as positive feedback from the Veterans using REVAMP. The difficulty of supporting Veteran creation of login credentials to the program and integrating REVAMP into the existing workflow were major barriers to its implementation. CONCLUSION: Improving leadership engagement, simplifying the enrollment process, and enhancing the medical staff experience through shared best practice alerts were identified as actions needed to improve the penetration of REVAMP at future rollout sites.

Change in Attitude among Nursing Undergraduate Students Following One-Month Exposure in a Mental Healthcare Setting.

BACKGROUND: Attitude of treating professionals plays an important role in the treatment of mental illnesses. Nursing professionals are an important part of the mental health care team. As a part of their nursing coursework, nursing students are posted in a mental health setting. It is important to assess the impact of such postings on their attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 235 undergraduate nursing students posted in a mental healthcare setting for one month participated in the study. Their attitude towards mental illness and psychiatry was assessed before and after the posting, using Personal data sheet, Attitude Scale of Mental Illness (ASMI), and Attitude towards Psychiatry Scale (ATP). RESULTS: At pre-assessment, the nursing students had a negative attitude on all dimensions of ASMI except benevolence, and positive attitude on all the six domains of ATP. At post-assessment, attitude improved significantly on pessimistic prediction dimension of ASMI, and they were able to maintain their positive attitude on ATP. CONCLUSIONS: One-month posting had a weak positive impact on attitude towards mental illness and no detrimental impact on attitude towards psychiatry. There is a need for better efforts to increase the impact of training on attitude towards mental illness.

Convergence in patient-therapist therapeutic alliance ratings and its relation to outcome in chronic depression treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested whether discrepancy between patients' and therapists' ratings of the therapeutic alliance, as well as convergence in their alliance ratings over time, predicted outcome in chronic depression treatment. METHOD: Data derived from a controlled trial of partial or non-responders to open-label pharmacotherapy subsequently randomized to 12 weeks of algorithm-driven pharmacotherapy alone or pharmacotherapy plus psychotherapy. The current study focused on the psychotherapy conditions (N = 357). Dyadic multilevel modeling was used to assess alliance discrepancy and alliance convergence over time as predictors of two depression measures: one pharmacotherapist-rated (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Clinician; QIDS-C), the other blind interviewer-rated (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; HAMD). RESULTS: Patients' and therapists' alliance ratings became more similar, or convergent, over the course of psychotherapy. Higher alliance convergence was associated with greater reductions in QIDS-C depression across psychotherapy. Alliance convergence was not significantly associated with declines in HAMD depression; however, greater alliance convergence was related to lower HAMD scores at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results partially support the hypothesis that increasing patient-therapist consensus on alliance quality during psychotherapy may improve treatment and longer term outcomes.