Disparities in ovarian cancer survival among ethnic Asian American populations, 2006-2020.

BACKGROUND: Asian Americans have the highest ovarian cancer survival across the major racial groups although it is unclear whether this survival advantage is observed when each Asian ethnic subgroup is examined separately. Disaggregated survival analyses of this heterogeneous population is needed to ensure ethnic-specific disparities are not overlooked. METHODS: Data on ovarian cancer cases diagnosed from 2006 through 2020 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program were analyzed. Age-standardized five-year cause-specific survival was calculated for Non-Hispanic Whites and seven Asian ethnic subgroups in the U.S. (Asian Indian/Pakistani, Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese) by stage and histotype. Multivariable Cox regression analyses using a weighted approach were conducted to calculate average hazard ratios (AHRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify the risk of ovarian cancer death comparing each Asian ethnic subgroup to Non-Hispanic Whites. RESULTS: Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders were the only Asian subgroup to show lower five-year cause-specific survival than Non-Hispanic Whites (44.99 % versus 47.90 %, respectively); Asian Indian/Pakistanis showed the highest survival (56.12 %). After adjusting for sociodemographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics, Asian Indian/Pakistani ovarian cancer patients were 17 % less likely to die from their disease whereas Hawaiian/Pacific Islander patients were 28 % more likely to die when compared to Non-Hispanic Whites (AHR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.75-0.92 and AHR = 1.28, 95 % CI 1.07-1.53, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There are clear ethnic-specific survival disparities among Asian American ovarian cancer patients that are missed when the population is examined as a single group, further highlighting the need for data disaggregation in future ovarian cancer research.

"Can I Call You Back?": A Medical Student's Reflections on Research Recruitment in a Black Community.

Historical mistreatment of Black persons in research settings has had lasting impacts on their recruitment into present-day studies. A medical student recruited Black individuals for a qualitative study aiming to improve the experiences of Black patients treated in a psychiatric emergency department of a large tertiary care setting. The lessons learned, including the nuanced power dynamics present when a Black student is recruiting Black patients, highlight opportunities for addressing racial inequities through empowerment of the Black community and for requiring investigators to create racially conscious recruitment plans.

An Intersectional Approach to Cervical Cancer Screening Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Status.

Background: Disparities in cervical cancer (CC) screening exist within racial/ethnic minority and immigrant groups. However, few studies have explored the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on screening, and the disparities that have been identified by existing studies remain incompletely explained. This study aims to identify the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on CC screening and elucidate the barriers contributing to identified disparities. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 25,660 U.S. women from the 2005, 2010, and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys was done. The CC screening up-to-date status of cases was analyzed by race/ethnicity and immigrant status using logistic regression models. Conceptualized mediators were added to models to identify their contribution to identified disparities. Results: All immigrants had lower screening odds than U.S.-born non-Hispanic White women with foreign-born non-Hispanic Asians having the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.49) followed by foreign-born non-Hispanic White (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76), Hispanic/Latinx (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99). Adjusting for only socioeconomic status or access to care attenuated the aOR: for foreign-born Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women only. Adjusting simultaneously for language and acculturation attenuated the aOR: for all immigrants. Conclusions: Disparities in CC screening were only found in the immigrant populations of various racial/ethnic groups. Targeting insurance and health care access may address disparities in immigrant Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women. Focusing on culturally and linguistically competent care and education may be more crucial for immigrant non-Hispanic Asian and White women.

Engaging Diverse African American/Black and Latine Youth and Emerging Adults Living with HIV into Research: Description of Recruitment Strategies and Lessons Learned.

Improving engagement along the HIV care continuum and reducing racial/ethnic disparities are necessary to end the HIV epidemic. Research on African American/Black and Latine (AABL) younger people living with HIV (LWH) is essential to this goal. However, a number of key subgroups are challenging to locate and engage, and are therefore under-represented in research. Primary among these are persons with non-suppressed HIV viral load, severe socioeconomic disadvantage, transgender/gender expansive identities, and refugee/migrant/immigrant populations. Research in community settings is needed to complement studies conducted in medical institutions. The present study describes the efficiency of recruitment strategies used in the community to enroll AABL young and emerging adults LWH ages 19-28 years. Strategies were designed to be culturally responsive and structurally salient. They were: peer-to-peer, social media, classified advertisements (newspaper, craigslist), subway ads, dating apps (Jack'd, Positive Singles), and direct recruitment in community-based organizations. Data were analyzed using mainly descriptive statistics and interpreted using a consensus building approach. We screened 575 individuals in a first step, 409 were eligible (71%), of these 297 presented to the second screening step (73%), but 112 were lost. Almost all presenting at the second step were eligible (98%, 291/297) and 94% enrolled (274/291). Peer-to-peer, dating app (Jack'd), direct recruitment, and craigslist were the most efficient strategies. Recruitment on dating apps was superior to the peer-to-peer approach in yielding eligible participants (OR = 1.5; 95% CI: 0.98-2.3; p = 0.06). The sample enrolled was diverse with respect to HIV viral suppression, gender identify, sexual orientation, immigration status, and barriers to HIV care engagement. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy. Recruitment is a vital aspect of research and warrants attention in the empirical literature.

Second Look at Reported Racial-Ethnic Employment Differences in the Supported Employment Demonstration.

OBJECTIVE: The Supported Employment Demonstration (SED) trial, which studied the effects of individual placement and support (IPS) among individuals initially denied Social Security Administration disability benefits for mental illness, reported racial-ethnic differences in IPS' effect on employment. Because of high rates of attrition in the SED, this finding warranted further study. The current reanalysis used a subsample with a directly observed measure of competitive employment and less attrition to try to corroborate the reported racial-ethnic differences. METHODS: The authors compared self-reported employment (collected via telephone interviews) with observed employment (reported monthly by multidisciplinary teams) among a representative subsample (N=614) of the SED, stratified by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: The observed competitive employment outcomes showed no significant racial-ethnic differences among those assigned to participate in IPS. CONCLUSIONS: Congruent with previous research, reanalysis based on more complete data and more rigorous outcome measurements implied an absence of racial-ethnic differences in IPS' effect on observed employment outcomes.

Prevalence Trends and Treatment Patterns of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children and Adolescents in the United States from 2017 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) poses a significant challenge due to its diverse impact on individuals, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment plans. The financial burden of ASD-related healthcare is substantial, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its prevalence and evolving trends. METHODS: This study aims to analyze the prevalence and trends of ASD, treatment patterns, gender differences, and racial-ethnic disparities in the United States from 2017 to 2020, utilizing nationally representative data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). The NSCH, a leading annual national survey, provided rich data on child health. A total of 108,142 participants aged 3-17 years were included, with ASD prevalence assessed based on self-reported diagnoses. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, ASD prevalence in children aged 3-17 was 2.94% (95% confidence interval: 2.68-3.18). Significant disparities were observed: older age and male gender correlated with higher prevalence, while family income-to-poverty ratio and insurance coverage influenced prevalence. Racial/ethnic disparities existed, with Hispanics showing the highest prevalence. Treatment trends showed stability overall, but age influenced behavioral and medication interventions. The prevalence remained stable from 2017 to 2020, with variations in age groups and a significant increase among non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a higher but stable overall ASD prevalence, with nuanced disparities among different demographic groups. Gender differences persist, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions. Racial-ethnic disparities call for targeted healthcare strategies. The stability in treatment trends underscores the persistent challenge of addressing core ASD symptoms.

Increasing Prevalence of Diagnosed Gestational Diabetes in South Carolina: 2015-2021.

Objective: To examine trends with a focus on racial and ethnic disparities in reported gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and related outcomes (macrosomia, large for gestational age infants) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina (SC). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pregnancies resulting in livebirths from 2015 through 2021 was conducted in SC. Statewide maternal hospital and emergency department discharge codes were linked to birth certificate data. GDM was defined by ICD-9-CM (i.e., 648.01-648.02, 648.81-648.82) or ICD-10-CM codes (i.e., O24.4, O24.1, O24.9), or indication of GDM on the birth certificate without evidence of diabetes outside pregnancy (ICD-9-CM: 250.xx; ICD-10-CM: E10, E11, O24.0, O24.1, O24.3). Results: Our study included 194,777 non-Hispanic White (White), 108,165 non-Hispanic Black (Black), 25,556 Hispanic, and 16,344 other race-ethnic group pregnancies. The relative risk for GDM associated with a 1-year increase was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.02) before the pandemic and 1.12 (1.09-1.14) during the pandemic. While there were race-ethnic differences in the prevalence of GDM, increasing trends were similar across all race-ethnic groups before and during the pandemic. From quarter 1, 2020, to quarter 4, 2021, the prevalence of reported GDM increased from 8.92% to 10.85% in White, from 8.04% to 9.78% in Black, from 11.2% to 13.65% in Hispanic, and from 13.3% to 16.16% in other race-ethnic women. Conclusion: An increasing prevalence of diagnosed GDM was reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying increasing trends, to develop interventions, and to determine whether the increasing trend continues in subsequent years.

Achieving equitable access to incretin-based therapies in cardiovascular care.

The role of incretin-based therapies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists, in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity has been increasingly recognized, along with significant cardiovascular (CV) benefits. Despite the clinical efficacy of incretin-based therapies, high costs, suboptimal access, limited insurance coverage, and therapeutic inertia present substantial barriers to widespread adoption. Overcoming these obstacles is essential for the equitable initiation, access, and utilization of incretin-based therapies. Clinicians must make targeted efforts to ensure health equity in the use of these and other advanced therapies.

Racial/ethnic disparities in all-cause and cause-specific death among children with malignant central nervous system tumours: a registry-based cohort retrospective analysis.

Background: It is generally recognized that there is unequal mortality in childhood central nervous system (CNS) malignancy in the United States (US), but little is known about the trends and contributors of racial/ethnic disparities in death. We assessed the trends of racial/ethnic disparities in all-cause and cause-specific death, and the contributions of tumour, treatment and socioeconomic factors to this disparity. Methods: This registry-based cohort study included children (aged ≤19 years) diagnosed with malignant CNS tumours, using data from the US population-based cancer registry in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. The clinical outcomes were all-cause and cause-specific death for each racial/ethnic group (White, Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander [API], and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native [AI/AN] children). We quantified absolute disparities using absolute rate difference in 5-year cumulative incidence of death. Cox proportion risk models were used to estimate the relative racial/ethnic disparities, and the contribution of factors to disparities in death. Findings: In this study, data from 14,510 children with malignant CNS tumours (mean [SD] age, 8.5 [5.7]; 7988 [55.1%] male) were analysed. Overall, the cumulative incidence of death from CNS tumours across four racial/ethnic groups decreased from 2001 to 2020. Black patients had the highest risk of death from all causes and CNS tumours between 2001 and 2020, with adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of 1.52 (1.38-1.68) and 1.47 (1.31-1.64), respectively. The absolute disparity in all-cause death between Hispanic and White patients increased slightly (from 8.2 percentage points [ppt] to 9.4 ppt), and the relative disparity in death from CNS tumours increased from 1.33 (1.15-1.55) in 2001-2005 to 1.78 (1.44-2.20) in 2016-2020. The absolute disparities in death from CNS tumours between Black and White patients (from 11.8 ppt to 4.3 ppt) and between API and White patients (from 10.1 ppt to 5.1 ppt) decreased from 2001-2005 to 2011-2015. Interpretation: Race/ethnicity disparities in death from CNS tumours among childhood malignant CNS tumours had reduced from 2001 to 2020, and quantifying the contribution of factors to this disparity in death could provide a basis for decreasing mortality among racial/ethnic minority patients. Funding: Shenyang Young and Middle-aged Science and Technology Innovation Talent Support Program.

Recent racial/ethnic disparities in cancer-specific mortality among patients diagnosed with rectal cancer.

Background: African American patients frequently receive nonstandard treatment and demonstrate poorer overall survival (OS) outcomes compared to White patients. Our objective was to analysis whether racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer-specific mortality remain after accounting for clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care-related factors. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer between 2011 and 2020 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. The cumulative incidence of rectal cancer-specific mortality was computed. Sub-distribution hazard ratios (sdHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for rectal cancer-specific mortality associated with race/ethnicity were estimated using Fine and Gray model with stepwise adjustments for clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and factors related to access-to-care. Results: Among 54,370 patients, non-Hispanic (NH) Black individuals exhibited the highest cumulative incidence of rectal cancer-specific mortality (39%), followed by American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) (35%), Hispanics (32%), NH-White (31%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) (30%). After adjusting for clinical characteristics, NH-Black patients had a 28% increased risk of rectal cancer mortality (sdHR, 1.28; 95% CI: 1.20-1.35) compared to NH-White patients. In contrast, mortality disparities between Hispanic-White, AI/AN-White, and API-White groups were not significant. The Black-White mortality differences persisted even after adjustments for treatment and access-to-care-related factors. In stratified analyses, among patients with a median household income below $59,999, AI/AN patients showed higher mortality than NH-Whites when adjusted for clinical characteristics (sdHR, 1.32; 95% CI: 1.03-1.70). Conclusions: Overall, the racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer-specific mortality were largely attributable to differences in clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and factors related to access-to-care. These findings emphasize the critical need for equitable healthcare to effectively address and reduce the significant racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer outcomes.

The Role of Interactional Processes in Mental Health Disparities: A Narrative Review of Existing Research and Recommendations for Providers.

Mental health disparities between racial/ethnic minority groups and non-Latinx Whites in the United States persist despite significant efforts aimed at decreasing these disparities. Efforts to address mental health disparities have largely focused on individual (e.g., stigma, help-seeking, health behaviors) and structural (e.g., public policy, interventions, addressing poverty) level factors. In contrast, this paper considers how processes at the interactional level (i.e., interactions between patients and providers) are also an important contributor to racial/ethnic disparities in mental health. Specifically, social psychological research has demonstrated how biases, including stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination, can affect patient-provider interactions and contribute to mental health disparities. This narrative review of empirical studies that examine interactional processes between patients and mental health providers identified eleven studies to be included. Concepts represented in the studies are summarized and additional frameworks that can help explain how disparities are maintained are proposed. Last of all, practical suggestions for mitigating provider bias during patient-provider interactions are provided based on the findings from the narrative review.

Cognitive Performance Between Latino and White Non-Latino Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive impairment is a common nonmotor symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD). Individuals of Latino background are traditionally underrepresented in research on PD. Despite the fact that Latinos comprise 18% of the U.S. population, they commonly make up less than 5% of samples in studies of PD. Emerging evidence suggests that Latino individuals with PD may experience disparities relative to White non-Latinos in terms of having more severe motor symptoms, more severe depressive symptoms, and worse health-related quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to investigate differences in cognitive performance between Latino and White non-Latino individuals with PD and examine correlates of cognitive performance. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative. Participants included 60 Latino individuals with PD and 1,009 White non-Latino individuals with PD, all of whom were followed annually for up to 5 years. Participants completed neuropsychological tests of attention and working memory, processing speed, visuospatial functioning, verbal fluency, and immediate and delayed memory and recall. RESULTS: Relative to White non-Latino individuals with PD, Latino individuals with PD had significantly lower scores on the global measure of cognitive functioning, a test of processing speed, and tests of working memory and attention. Years of education was the strongest correlate of performance in these three cognitive domains among individuals in the Latino group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide initial evidence of disparities in cognitive functioning among Latino individuals with PD. Educational disadvantages may be one potential driver of these disparities.

Racial/ethnic differences in risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SA) are risk factors for suicide which peak during adolescence; however, evidence focused on differences in SI and SA risk among racial/ethnic minority youth is limited despite increasing suicide rates among several racial/ethnic minority groups. METHODS: We analyzed a representative sample of adolescents aged 12-17 with prior depressive symptoms (n = 32,617) from the cross-sectional National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (2008-2019). Survey-weighted adjusted logistic regressions estimated the association of race/ethnicity with self-reported lifetime SI and SA, controlling for sociodemographics, lifetime substance use, lifetime major depressive episode, and self-rated health. RESULTS: Compared to white adolescents, Black and Hispanic adolescents had a 2.5 % (p = 0.04) and 4.2 % (p < 0.001) lower likelihood of reporting SI. However, among participants reporting SI, Black and Hispanic adolescents had a 3.2 % (p = 0.03) and 3.1 % (p = 0.03) higher likelihood of reporting SA than white adolescents. Multiracial adolescents were 5.9 % (p = 0.03) more likely to report SA than white adolescents. LIMITATIONS: Although racial/ethnic minority groups are less likely to self-report mental health symptoms, we could only assess SI/SA among adolescents self-reporting prior depressive symptoms, and we could only assess SA among adolescents self-reporting SI due to survey methods. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the racial/ethnic distribution of suicidality supports theories conceptualizing separate pathways for SI and SA. This underscores the need for greater attention to racial/ethnic differences in suicide-related research, surveillance, and prevention efforts, including ensuring that mental health risk assessments directly evaluate SA in addition to SI in order to better identify high-risk racial/ethnic minority youth.

Trends in Endometrial Cancer Incidence in the United States by Race/Ethnicity and Age of Onset from 2000 to 2019.

Endometrial cancer is one of few cancers that has continued to rise in incidence over the past decade with disproportionate increases in adults younger than 50 years old. We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry (2000-2019) to examine endometrial cancer incidence trends by race/ethnicity and age of onset among women in the United States. Case counts and proportions, age-adjusted incidence rates (per 100,000), and average annual percent changes were calculated by race/ethnicity, overall and stratified by age of onset (early vs late). We found a disproportionate increase in endometrial cancer incidence among women of color, for both early and late onset endometrial cancer. The highest increases in early onset endometrial cancer (<50 years old) were observed among American Indian/Alaska Native women (4.8), followed by Black (3.3), Hispanic/Latina (3.1), and Asian and Pacific Islander women (2.4), whereas white women (0.9) had the lowest increase. Late onset (>50 years old) endometrial cancer incidence followed a similar pattern, with the greatest increases for women of color. The increasing burden of endometrial cancer among women of color, particularly those younger than 50 years old, is a major public health problem necessitating further research and clinical efforts focused on health equity.

Therapist-Driven Telephone Call Outreach to Improve Depression Remission in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

The authors examined the feasibility and impact of a therapist-driven outreach program on depression outcomes in a primary care clinic. Patients with a diagnosis of depression but missing a 1-year follow-up Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) screening were rescreened via telephone. Eligible patients (N=241) were contacted, and implementation rates and outcomes, along with feasibility, were assessed. Of the patients contacted, 47% indicated a depression response (reduction in PHQ-9 score of ≥50%), and 33% met remission criteria (PHQ-9 score <5). PHQ-9 scores decreased by approximately 7 points (p<0.001). This project may have helped to improve depression symptoms and remission rates for patients of the clinic and to facilitate patient reengagement with treatment.

Mitigating Racial Bias in Health Care Algorithms: Improving Fairness in Access to Supportive Housing.

Algorithms for guiding health care decisions have come under increasing scrutiny for being unfair to certain racial and ethnic groups. The authors describe their multistep process, using data from 3,465 individuals, to reduce racial and ethnic bias in an algorithm developed to identify state Medicaid beneficiaries experiencing homelessness and chronic health needs who were eligible for coordinated health care and housing supports. Through an iterative process of adjusting inputs, reviewing outputs with diverse stakeholders, and performing quality assurance, the authors developed an algorithm that achieved racial and ethnic parity in the selection of eligible Medicaid beneficiaries.

Prediabetes Progression and Reversion: Social Factors and Racial/Ethnic Differences.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected by diabetes. Social characteristics, such as family structure, social support, and loneliness, may contribute to these health disparities. In a nationally representative sample of diverse older adults, we evaluated longitudinal rates of both progression from prediabetes to diabetes and reversion from prediabetes to normoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the longitudinal Health and Retirement Study (2006-2014), our sample included 2625 follow-up intervals with a prediabetes baseline (provided by 2229 individuals). We analyzed 4-year progression and reversion rates using HbA1c and reported presence or absence of physician-diagnosed diabetes. We utilized chi-square and logistic regression models to determine how race/ethnicity and social variables influenced progression or reversion controlling for comorbidities and demographics. RESULTS: Overall, progression to diabetes was less common than reversion (17% vs. 36%). Compared to Whites, Hispanic/Latino respondents had higher odds of progression to diabetes from prediabetes while Black respondents had lower odds of reversion, adjusting for physical health and demographics. For social variables, Hispanics/Latinos had the highest reliance on and openness with family and the lowest rates of loneliness. The inclusion of social variables in regression models reduced the odds of progression for Hispanics/Latinos but did not alter Black's lower rate of reversion. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic/Latinos and Blacks not only had different transition pathways leading to diabetes, but also had different social profiles, affecting Hispanic/Latino progression, but not Black reversion. These differences in the influence of social variables on diabetes risk may inform the design of culturally-specific efforts to reduce disparities in diabetes burden.

Racial-Ethnic Gaps in Pandemic-Related Economic Hardship: Age Differences Among Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Racial-ethnic disparities in experiences of economic hardship during the pandemic are well documented in the population overall and among older adults. Existing research shows that this economic hardship was much less common at older than younger ages. Little is known about the intersection of racial-ethnic and age disparities in pandemic-related hardship in later life. This research report investigated racial-ethnic gaps in economic hardship by age group among older adults. METHODS: Data were from the 2018 and 2020 U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS) including the 2020 coronavirus disease 2019 module. We estimated Heckman-corrected linear probability models to examine differences in experiences of pandemic-related economic hardship in the 2020 HRS by race-ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, U.S.-born Hispanic, foreign-born Hispanic) across age groups (55-64, 65-74, 75+). In the multivariable analysis, we controlled for sociodemographic characteristics, participation in social programs, pre-existing health conditions and behaviors, and economic resources from the 2018 HRS. RESULTS: Experiences of economic hardship declined with age within each racial-ethnic group. Racial-ethnic gaps in hardship remained at older ages without any controls. However, when all controls were added, racial-ethnic gaps in economic hardship were eliminated for those ages 75+. Individual characteristics prior to the pandemic explained racial-ethnic differences in hardship for the oldest adults (75+) but did not explain gaps for those ages 55-74. DISCUSSION: Results point to structural factors generating new racial-ethnic gaps in pandemic-related economic hardship among those approaching retirement (ages 55-74) that did not affect the oldest adults (ages 75+).