Impact of sex on clinical outcome in early Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Previous evidence suggests sex differences in the clinical course of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but comprehensive early-stage prospective studies are lacking. We aim to quantify the impact of sex on clinical outcomes in early-stage RRMS. METHODS: Utilizing prospective cohort data, we assessed the impact of biological sex on time-to-relapse, disability progression (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]), extremity function (Nine-Hole Peg Test, Timed-25-food walk test), cognition (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test), quality-of-life (Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis, Short-Form-36), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive functions), and depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II) in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or RRMS patients. Inclusion was within 12 months of symptom onset. Linear, negative binomial, mixed, and Cox models estimated male vs. female effects at the four-year follow-up including baseline-to-follow-up course. RESULTS: We included 149 patients (65.1 % female). Eighty-five completed four-year follow-up. No sex differences in time-to-relapse emerged (HR = 0.91;95 %CI = 0.53-1.58). Males had no increased risk of EDSS worsening (OR = 0.75;95 %CI = 0.21-2.35) compared to females. Similarly, minor/no sex differences emerged in other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Four years after first manifestation, neither disease activity (disability progression and relapse rate) nor patient-reported outcomes showed sex-related disparities in this early-MS-cohort. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01371071.

Safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: A descriptive analysis of data from the EudraVigilance database.

The most prevalent disease course of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Fingolimod (Gilenya®) was the first oral disease-modifying therapy to RRMS. Patients affected by MS require long-term treatment, making the ongoing evaluation of the safety profile of fingolimod imperative. The aim of this study was to analyze the post-marketing pharmacovigilance data of fingolimod in Europe. Data of 12-year period (1 January 2011-19 June 2023) were obtained from EudraVigilance, and a descriptive analysis using drug-reaction pairs was performed. A total of 22,957 reports were collected. The most reported adverse events (AEs) were related to nervous system disorders SOC (multiple sclerosis relapse n = 2271; 3.51%, headache n = 921; 1.42%, central nervous system lesion n = 893; 1,38%, dizziness 769; 1,19%, hypoaesthesia 487; 0.75% and multiple sclerosis 449; 0.69%), followed by investigations (lymphocyte count decreased n = 1648; 2.55%, white blood cell count decreased n = 833; 1.29%), blood and lymphatic system disorder (lymphopenia n = 1146; 1.77%), and general disorders and administration site condition (fatigue n = 1106; 1.71%, gait disturbance 564; 0.87%). A percentage of 23.00% of serious adverse events (SAEs), among the most reported were multiple sclerosis relapse (n = 2271; 15.27%), macular oedema (n = 793; 5.33%), bradycardia (n = 678; 4.56%), leukopenia (n = 533; 3.58%), and multiple sclerosis (n = 449; 3.02%). Most of AEs were non-serious, some SAEs related to cardiac, ophthalmic and infectious disorders emerged: their prevalence, along with the alignment of reported AEs with existing literature, supports the overall safety of fingolimod. Considering the rare and long-term ADRs that may arise in patients chronically treated for MS, continuous pharmacovigilance remains essential.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of ozanimod versus other oral DMTs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a synthesis of matching-adjusted indirect comparisons.

Background: Several oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In the absence of head-to-head randomized data, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) can evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of ozanimod versus other oral DMTs in RRMS. Objectives: To synthesize results from the published MAICs of ozanimod and other oral DMTs for 2-year outcomes in RRMS. Methods: Published MAICs involving ozanimod for the treatment of RRMS were identified. Extracted data elements included efficacy [annualized relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression (CDP), and brain volume loss] and safety [adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, and infection] outcomes. Results: The four MAIC studies identified compared ozanimod with fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and ponesimod. All comparisons were adjusted for differences in age, sex, relapses within the previous year, Expanded Disability Status Scale score, and percentage of patients with prior DMTs. Outcomes at 2 years were analyzed based on comparisons that lacked a common comparator arm. Ozanimod was associated with significantly lower ARR versus teriflunomide [ARR ratio (95% CI) 0.73 (0.62, 0.84) and DMF 0.80 (0.67, 0.97)], with no significant difference versus fingolimod or ponesimod. The proportions of patients treated with ozanimod or fingolimod had similar 3- and 6-month CDP. Compared with teriflunomide and DMF, ozanimod was associated with a significantly lower risk of 3-month CDP; 6-month CDP was comparable. Ozanimod was associated with significantly lower rates of any AE and AEs leading to discontinuation compared with the other oral DMTs evaluated. Ozanimod also had significantly lower rates of SAEs versus teriflunomide and DMF and lower rates of reported infection outcomes versus fingolimod and ponesimod. Conclusion: Compared with the other oral DMTs evaluated in MAICs, ozanimod was associated with a favorable safety profile and improved or comparable efficacy outcomes.

An indirect comparison of ozanimod vs other oral treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis The many treatment options available for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) make treatment decisions difficult. While direct head-to-head treatment comparisons provide useful information, these studies are not available for every pair of treatments. Indirect comparisons of published study results can help fill that evidence gap. A technique called matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) offers a statistically robust way to compare safety/efficacy outcomes from different studies by accounting for important differences across the studies. We collected data from four MAIC studies that compared 2-year treatment outcomes in patients treated with ozanimod versus those treated with fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), or ponesimod. Each study accounted for differences in age, sex, relapses within the previous year, disability status, and previous therapy use. We found ozanimod was either better than or similar to other treatments based on the outcomes measured. The annual rate of RRMS relapse was lower for patients treated with ozanimod than for patients treated with teriflunomide or DMF and similar for patients treated with ponesimod or fingolimod. Ozanimod-treated patients saw their RRMS progress at rates similar to those treated with fingolimod at 3 and 6 months and teriflunomide and DMF at 6 months; RRMS was more likely to progress at 3 months in patients treated with teriflunomide and DMF versus those treated with ozanimod. Our analyses also found that patients treated with ozanimod had lower rates of side effects, including those serious enough to cause treatment discontinuation, compared with patients receiving other treatments. By comparing findings from existing MAIC studies, we found that patients with RRMS treated with ozanimod had fewer side effects and better or similar efficacy outcomes compared with patients who received other treatments for RRMS. These findings can potentially inform treatment decisions for patients with RRMS.

De-escalation of Disease-Modifying Therapy for People with Multiple Sclerosis Due to Safety Considerations: Characterizing 1-Year Outcomes in 25 People Who Switched from Ocrelizumab to Diroximel Fumarate.

INTRODUCTION: Switching disease-modifying therapy (DMT) may be considered for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) if a patient's current therapy is no longer optimal. This was particularly important during the recent COVID-19 pandemic because of considerations around immune deficiency and impaired vaccine response associated with B cell-depleting DMTs. This real-world, single-center study aimed to evaluate change or decline in functional ability and overall disease stability in people with RRMS who were switched from B cell-depleting ocrelizumab (OCRE) to diroximel fumarate (DRF) because of safety concern related to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Adults with RRMS were included if they had been clinically stable for ≥ 1 year on OCRE. Data collected at baseline and 1 year post switch included relapse rate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), blood work for assessment of peripheral immune parameters, the Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: Participants (N = 25) had a mean (SD) age of 52 (9) years, and a mean (SD) duration of 26 (8) months' treatment with OCRE before the switch to DRF. Median washout duration since the last OCRE infusion was 7 months (range 4-18 months). No participants relapsed on DRF during follow-up, and all remained persistent on DRF after 1 year. There were no significant changes in peripheral immune parameters, other than an increase in the percentage of CD19+ cells 1 year after switching (p < 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant changes in CAB, OCT, and PROs. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that transition to DRF from OCRE may be an effective treatment option for people with RRMS who are clinically stable but may need to switch for reasons unrelated to effectiveness. Longer follow-up times on larger samples are needed to confirm these observations.

The effect of COVID-19 vaccination on multiple sclerosis activity as reflected by MRI.

INTRODUCTION: Examining the safety of theBNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients remains inconclusive, particularly regarding the potential for disease exacerbations. This study aims to assess the effects of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination on disease activity in MS patients through sequential MRI imaging. METHODS: A retrospective study of 84 MS patients from five Israeli hospitals was conducted. MS lesion load was determined from three brain MRI scans, one postvaccination and two prevaccination scans. A post hoc analysis compared subgroups featuring vaccinated and unvaccinated patients respectively, with early onset MS. RESULTS: The cohort included 70 women with early onset (mean age 16.4 ± 0.8 years) and adult onset (mean age 34.9 ± 1.1 years) MS. Among the early onset group, vaccinated patients showed an increased risk of new lesions (p = .00026), while there was no increased risk among adult-onset patients. Additionally, a comparison between early onset vaccinated and nonvaccinated groups revealed a higher risk of increased lesions in the vaccinated group (p = .024). DISCUSSION: Overall, the study suggests that the BNT162b2 vaccine is generally safe in MS patients, with no association found between vaccination and new lesions in most patients. However, close MRI follow-up is recommended for early-onset MS cases to monitor lesion development.

Age-corrected neurofilament light chain ratio decreases but does not predict relapse in highly active multiple sclerosis patients initiating natalizumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: Neurofilament light chain (NFL) is a biomarker for monitoring disease activity and treatment response in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, while most agree that NFL levels predict disease activity and worsening, the predictive value of NFL on future relapse risk remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to evaluate the predictive value of age-corrected serum NFL (sNFL) ratio on relapse risk in highly active relapsing-remitting MS patients (RRMS) treated with natalizumab. A secondary aim was to investigate the predictive value of sNFL ratios for MRI activity. METHODS: From January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010, 355 patients initiated natalizumab treatment at the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center. 305 patients were anti-natalizumab antibodies negative and had at least one blood sample available for sNFL analysis using single molecule array analysis at baseline, three, six, or 12 months. The patients were either treatment-naïve (n = 8), switching from interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate (n = 253), or switching from mitoxantrone (n = 44). An age-corrected ratio was calculated for sNFL. Time to first relapse was calculated from baseline and after re-baseline at 90 days. Data were collected from baseline until the two-year follow-up or end of treatment and included disease duration, expanded disability status scale, previous treatments, relapses 12 months prior to natalizumab initiation, smoking intensity, body mass index, and body weight. In addition, the patients underwent annual MRI of the brain. RESULTS: The sNFL ratio was increased in 173 of 287 samples (60.3 %) at baseline, in 119 of 246 samples (48.8 %) at month three, in 109 of 287 samples (38.0 %) at month six, and in 82 of 270 samples (30.4 %) at month 12. The sNFL ratio continuously declined over 12 months with significant decreases for every measuring timepoint: baseline vs. three months p = 3.0 × 10-6; three months vs. six months p = 3.2 × 10-5; six months vs. 12 months p = 0.002. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that time to first relapse from 1) natalizumab initiation and from 2) re-baseline was associated with the number of relapses in the previous 12 months (hazard ratio 1.31 per relapse, 95 % CI = 1.2-1.5, p = 2.0 × 10-6; and 1.21 per relapse, 95 % CI = 1.1-1.4, p = 0.002, respectively). sNFL ratio at re-baseline was negatively associated with relapse risk (hazard ratio 0.82 per unit; 95 % CI = 0.7-1.0; p = 0.049). A multivariable Cox regression analysis of relapse risk from re-baseline showed that the number of relapses in the 12 months prior to natalizumab treatment (hazard ratio 1.29; 95 % CI = 1.1-1.5; p = 6.0 × 10-4) and smoking (hazard ratio 1.51 per 20 cigarettes per day; 95 % CI = 1.0-2.2; p = 0.030) were associated with increased risk of relapse; sNFL ratio was associated with a lower risk of relapse (hazard ratio = 0.736 per unit; 95 % CI = 0.6-0.9 p = 0.007). In univariate logistic regression analyses, the sNFL ratio at 12 months and values above the 75th and the 90th percentile predicted MRI activity in the following year (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95 % CI = 1.2-3.6, p = 0.012; OR = 2.2, 95 % CI = 1.2-4.1, p = 0.014; and OR = 2.8, 95 % CI = 1.1-6.7, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: In this highly active RRMS cohort, high sNFL ratios reflected previous relapse activity and decreased after initiation of treatment but were not associated with increased relapse risk in the following two years. Pre-treatment relapses and smoking on treatment were predictors of relapse risk after re-baselining at 90 days. MRI activity in year two was predicted by sNFL ratios at month 12.

Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus non-specific immunosuppressants: Real-world evidence from MSBase.

Background: The use of non-specific immunosuppressants (NSIS) to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) remains prevalent in certain geographies despite safety concerns, likely due to resource limitations. Objective: To use MSBase registry data to compare real-world outcomes in adults with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) or NSIS (azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, mitoxantrone or mycophenolate mofetil) between January 1, 2014 and April 1, 2022. Methods: Treatment outcomes were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) Cox regression. Outcomes were annualized relapse rates (ARRs), time to discontinuation, time to first relapse (TTFR) and time to 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP) or 24-week confirmed disability improvement (CDI; in patients with baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≥2). Results: After IPTW, ARR was similar for DMF (0.13) and NSIS (0.16; p = 0.29). There was no difference in TTFR between cohorts (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; p = 0.84). The DMF cohort experienced longer times to discontinuation (HR: 0.75; p = 0.001) and CDP (HR: 0.53; p = 0.001), and shorter time to CDI (HR: 1.99; p < 0.008), versus the NSIS cohort. Conclusion: This analysis supports the use of DMF to treat patients with relapsing forms of MS, and may have implications for MS practices in countries where NSIS are commonly used to treat RRMS.

Do efficacy results obtained from randomized controlled trials translate to effectiveness data from observational studies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in regulatory decision making, as observational studies are known to have important methodological limitations. However, real-world evidence may be helpful in specific situations. This review investigates how the effect estimates obtained from randomized controlled trials compare to those obtained from observational studies, using drug therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis as an example. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies was conducted. The primary outcome was the annualized relapse rate. Using (network) meta-analysis together with posterior predictive distributions, the drug-specific rate ratios from the network of randomized controlled trials were compared with those from the network of observational studies. RESULTS: Effect estimates from 26 observational studies showed greater magnitudes and were less precise compared to estimates obtained from 21 randomized controlled trials. Twenty of the 28 treatment comparisons between designs had similar rate ratios. Seven inconsistencies in observed rate ratios could be attributed to two specific disease-modifying therapies. CONCLUSION: In this case study, estimates from observational studies predominantly agreed with estimates from randomized controlled trials given their posterior predictive distributions. Multiple observational studies together may therefore supplement additional pivotal randomized controlled trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, for instance facilitating the extrapolation of trial results to the broader patient population.

Metabolic syndrome and the phenotype of multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities, particularly vascular comorbidities, have been shown to exacerbate the progression of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of conditions including abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and vascular dysfunction, which contribute to vascular morbidity and chronic inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of MetS in a cohort of MS patients and evaluate its relationship with the MS phenotype. METHODS: A monocentric cohort study was conducted on MS patients, collecting demographic, clinical, radiological, and therapeutic data, as well as metabolic data including waist circumference, blood pressure, serum triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose. RESULTS: Among the 84 patients included in the study, 27% were diagnosed with MetS. MetS was found to be associated with secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Patients with SPMS had a higher prevalence of MetS compared to those with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), even after adjusting for disease duration. While MetS was associated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression in the 3-year period according to univariate analysis, it did not show a significant association with disease activity. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence supporting the connection between MetS and the progression of disability in MS, independent of disease relapse activity.

Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of white matter microstructure damage and cognitive correlations by automated fibre quantification in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

The purpose of this study was to characterize whole-brain white matter (WM) fibre tracts by automated fibre quantification (AFQ), capture subtle changes cross-sectionally and longitudinally in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients and explore correlations between these changes and cognitive performance A total of 114 RRMS patients and 71 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled and follow-up investigations were conducted on 46 RRMS patients. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusion (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) at each node along the 20 WM fibre tracts identified by AFQ were investigated cross-sectionally and longitudinally in entire and pointwise manners. Partial correlation analyses were performed between the abnormal metrics and cognitive performance. At baseline, compared with HCs, patients with RRMS showed a widespread decrease in FA and increases in MD, AD, and RD among tracts. In the pointwise comparisons, more detailed abnormalities were localized to specific positions. At follow-up, although there was no significant difference in the entire WM fibre tract, there was a reduction in FA in the posterior portion of the right superior longitudinal fasciculus (R_SLF) and elevations in MD and AD in the anterior and posterior portions of the right arcuate fasciculus (R_AF) in the pointwise analysis. Furthermore, the altered metrics were widely correlated with cognitive performance in RRMS patients. RRMS patients exhibited widespread WM microstructure alterations at baseline and alterations in certain regions at follow-up, and the altered metrics were widely correlated with cognitive performance in RRMS patients, which will enhance our understanding of WM microstructure damage and its cognitive correlation in RRMS patients.

Epstein-Barr virus-encoded BART9 and BART15 miRNAs are elevated in exosomes of cerebrospinal fluid from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is approved as the main environmental trigger of multiple sclerosis (MS). In this path, we quantified ebv-miR-BART9-3p and ebv-miR-BART15 in exosomes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of untreated relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients in comparison with the control group. Interestingly, patients displayed significant upregulation of ebv-miR-BART9-3p (18.4-fold) and ebv-miR-BART15 (3.1-fold) expression in CSF exosomes. Moreover, the expression levels of hsa-miR-21-5p and hsa-miR-146a-5p were found to be significantly elevated in the CSF samples obtained from the patient group compared to those obtained from the HC group. The levels of Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-17 (IL-17), interleukin-23 (IL-23), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were observed to be significantly elevated in the serum and CSF exosomes of the patients. The highest increase was observed in TGF-ß (8.5-fold), followed by IL-23 (3.9-fold) in CSF exosomes. These findings are in agreement with the association between EBV infection and inflammatory cytokines induction. Furthermore, the ratios of TGF-ß: TNF-α and TGF-ß: IFN-γ attained values of 4 to 16.4 and 1.3 to 3.6, respectively, in the CSF exosomes of the patients, in comparison to those of the control group. These findings show EBV activity in RRMS patients is different from that of healthy ones. Elevation of ebv-miR-BART9-3p, ebv-miR-BART15, and inflammatory cytokines expression in CSF exosomes in RRMS patients provides a substantial link between EBV activity and the onset of the disease, as well as the transition from EBV infection to MS.

Prospective observational study to evaluate treatment satisfaction and effectiveness in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis starting cladribine tablets (CLADREAL) in Italy.

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) reduce relapse frequency, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, and slow disability progression. Numerous DMTs are approved for relapsing forms of MS although real-world data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and quality of life (QoL) are needed to inform treatment choice. Immune reconstitution therapy with cladribine tablets is a highly effective treatment for relapsing MS (RMS). We present the protocol for an observational study to prospectively assess the effectiveness of cladribine tablets on clinical and MRI parameters as well as on PROs, including treatment satisfaction, QoL, sleep quality, self-perceived health, fatigue, and physical function. Enrolled patients at study sites in Italy will be adults with RMS (including relapsing-remitting and active secondary progressive MS) who are either treatment naïve or have received at least one first-line disease modifying DMT or no more than one second-line DMT. The primary objective will be change in global treatment satisfaction measured with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 approximately 24 months after initiating cladribine tablets in patients switching from previous DMTs. Secondary objectives will include global treatment satisfaction at earlier timepoints, will comprise treatment naïve patients, and will quantify treatment effectiveness and tolerability. We will also assess relapses, disability progression, MRI activity, and other PROs at approximately 12 and 24 months. The findings will provide insight from daily clinical practice into the patient's experience to complement data from controlled trials and inform treatment choice. EU PAS Registration Number EUPAS49334 filed 17/10/2022.

ENSEMBLE PLUS: final results of shorter ocrelizumab infusion from a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Ocrelizumab is an approved intravenously administered anti-CD20 antibody for multiple sclerosis (MS). The safety profile and patient preference for conventional versus shorter ocrelizumab infusions were investigated in the ENSEMBLE PLUS study. METHODS: ENSEMBLE PLUS was a randomized, double-blind substudy to the single-arm ENSEMBLE study (NCT03085810), comparing outcomes in patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting MS receiving ocrelizumab 600 mg over the approved 3.5-h (conventional) versus 2-h (shorter) infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) following the first randomized dose (RD); the secondary endpoint included IRR frequency at subsequent RDs. RESULTS: At first RD, the number of patients with an IRR in the conventional (101/373; 27.1%) versus shorter (107/372; 28.8%) infusion group was similar (difference, stratified estimates [95% CI]: 1.9% [- 4.4, 8.2]). Most IRRs (conventional: 99.4%; shorter: 97.7%) were mild/moderate. IRR frequency decreased over the course of RDs; three patients discontinued from the shorter infusion arm but continued with conventional infusion. Overall, > 98% of IRRs resolved without sequelae in both groups. Pre-randomization throat irritation was predictive of future throat irritation as an IRR symptom. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were consistent with the known ocrelizumab safety profile. On completion of ENSEMBLE PLUS, most patients chose to remain on (95%) or switch to (80%) shorter infusion. CONCLUSION: ENSEMBLE PLUS demonstrates the safety and tolerability of shorter ocrelizumab infusions. Most patients remained on/switched to shorter infusion after unblinding; IRRs did not strongly influence patient decisions. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Substudy of ENSEMBLE (NCT03085810). REGISTRATION: March 21, 2017.

Alemtuzumab infusion-associated reactions and laboratory changes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis at baseline and first-year follow-up.

Background: Alemtuzumab (ATZ) is an anti-CD52 humanized monoclonal antibody indicated for treating highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). It alters the regulation of the immune system by depleting circulating lymphocytes. Changes in blood cell count, infusion-related reactions, and changes in vital parameters can be seen in the early period with ATZ. Aim: Changes in blood tests, serum tests, vital parameters, and characteristics of infusion-associated reactions (IARs) observed during the first course of ATZ treatment and thereafter were evaluated. Materials and methods: The systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), fever, heart rate (HR), changes in blood and serum tests, and IARs developed after the first course of 23 patients with RRMS who received ATZ treatment were evaluated by comparing the results of 26 patients with RRMS who received only intravenous methylprednisolone. Results: Mean age was 36.60 ± 8.98, 73.9% female (n = 17), diagnosis time was 8.52 ± 3.64 years, pre-EDSS: 3.93 ± 1.80. No significant difference was found in vital parameters except for sub-febrile fever that developed on the first day. The number of white blood cells increased significantly after the first day. The hemoglobin level did not change. Lymphocyte (very high) and platelet (mild) counts decreased starting from the first days, and eosinophil (very high) and monocyte (moderate) counts decreased from the third day. There were no significant changes in liver enzymes, thyroid function tests, serum urea, creatinine, and lipid profile during 1-year follow-up. The IAR rate was 95.6% and occurred most frequently on the second and third days. The most common are dermatological findings (52%), headache (20%), pain (10%) and fatigue (8%). Conclusion: Alemtuzumab has no appreciable effect on vital parameters during infusion. However, these changes are not clinically correlated, even if there is. Headache in the first days, dermatological (most common) findings, pain, and fatigue are seen in the following days. Most IARs can be resolved with symptomatic treatment and close follow-up. Lymphocytes, eosinophils, and monocytes are significantly reduced and return to baseline levels towards the end of the first year. The first year does not cause significant pathologies in other serum parameters. However, after the first year, watch out for associated autoimmune pathologies, especially thyroid involvement.

Effects of a nighttime melatonin ingestion on dynamic postural balance and muscle strength the following morning in people living with multiple sclerosis: A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Decreased endogenous melatonin concentrations in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are associated with fatigue and pain that impair postural balance and muscle strength. Melatonin ingestion had analgesic and anti-fatigue effects. However, the acute effect of exogenous melatonin on dynamic postural stability and muscle strength has not been studied yet in PwMS. This study aimed to investigate the safety and the efficacy of a nighttime melatonin intake on dynamic postural balance and lower-extremity muscle strength the following morning in PwMS. METHODS: Fourteen PwMS (28.36 ± 6.81 years) were assessed (8 a.m.) pre- and post-acute intake of melatonin or placebo (6mg, 30 minutes before nocturnal bedtime). Evaluated parameters included dynamic postural balance (force platform), lower-extremity muscle strength [Five-Repetition Sit-To-Stand Test (5-STST)], hand dexterity (Nine-Hole Peg Test), nociceptive pain [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], neuropathic pain [Neuropathic Pain 4 Questions (DN4)], sleep quality and fatigue perception [Hooper Index (HI)]. RESULTS: In the frontal plane, melatonin reduced the center of pressure (CoP) path length (CoPL), CoPL in the anteroposterior axis (CoPLY) and CoP sway area (CoPAr) compared with placebo by 7.56% (p=0.02, Cohens'd (d)=1.24), 19.27% (p<0.001, d=2.60) and 13.82% (p<0.001, d=2.02), respectively. Melatonin induced a higher decrease in these posturographic parameters compared with placebo in the sagittal plane [CoPL: 9.10% (p=0.005, d=1.02), CoPLY: 4.29% (p=0.025, d=1.07) and CoPAr: 7.45% (p=0.038, d=0.74)]. Melatonin decreased 5-STST duration as well as VAS, DN4, HI-fatigue and HI-sleep scores compared with placebo by 8.19% (p=0.008, d=1.19), 5.74% (p=0.04, d=0.82), 27.30% (p=0.023, d=0.98), 40.15% (p=0.044, d=0.85) and 30.16% (p=0.012, d=1.10), respectively. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study, among PwMS, showed that acute melatonin ingestion was safe and efficient for improving dynamic postural stability and lower-extremity muscle strength probably through its analgesic and anti-fatigue effects.

Feasibility study to assess lesion repair in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled pilot clinical trial of domperidone add-on treatment.

BACKGROUND: Identification of therapies to promote repair in multiple sclerosis is challenged by the lack of an accepted trial model and associated outcome measures. The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of a new trial model that enrolls disease modifying therapy (DMT)-treated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) participants who have enhancing lesions on clinically indicated brain MRI, and to explore estimates of lesion repair using MRI. METHODS: This was a single site randomized controlled clinical trial. Recruitment took place between November 2015 and January 2019, with final follow-up in February 2019. DMT-treated RRMS participants aged 18-60 years with at least one gadolinium-enhancing lesion on clinically indicated brain MRI were included. Participants were randomized 2:1 to oral domperidone add-on 10-mg three times daily for 16 weeks or no add-on treatment (control). The primary outcomes were feasibility of the model pre-defined as recruitment of 24 participants within 36 months with a 79 % completion rate, and MRI outcomes of lesion repair measured at 16 and 32 weeks using texture analysis, magnetization transfer imaging (MTI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The impact of domperidone on serum prolactin at 6 and 16 weeks was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 237 RRMS participants screened, 17 (14 women) were randomized: 12 to domperidone add-on and 5 to control. All completed the study. Median (range) age was 38.9 (26.7-55.9) years; EDSS was 1.5 (1.0-3.5); and disease duration was 12.9 (2.9-23.3) years. Both groups showed improvement in MRI texture and diffusion fractional anisotropy (FA) at 32 weeks, and the domperidone group demonstrated additional recovery at 16 weeks in both texture and FA. There was no significant group difference in any MRI outcome. Of the 12 domperidone participants, 7 had ≥4x higher serum prolactin than normal. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The recruitment target was not met and therefore the trial model was not feasible despite a full completion rate. The imaging techniques performed well, especially MRI texture analysis, suggesting the sample size being sufficient for estimating lesion repair. The main challenge of this trial model may be recruiting gadolinium-enhancing lesions in DMT-treated RRMS participants. Prolactin is safe and may hold promise as a remyelination therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02493049.

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients exhibit differential natural killer functional subpopulations.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and has been known as T-cell mediated. However, the contribution of multiple cell types, notably natural killer (NK) cells, has also been reported. AIM: To quantify circulating total NK cells and its subpopulations, CD56 dim and bright, and to characterize the functional phenotype and IFN-γ and TNF-α production in relapsing-remitting patients treated with IFN-ß and in apparently healthy controls. RESULTS: CD56bright NK cells were found to be the least represented subpopulation. In relapse patients, the frequencies of IFN-γ-producing NK cells and their subpopulations were significantly decreased. In remission patients, CD56dim NK cells expressed high levels of HLA-DR and CD54. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that remission RRMS patients, although in an inactive stage of MS, present circulating NK cells with an activation phenotype, supporting the idea that NK cells may be relevant mediators in the MS pathophysiology.

On the Move: Correlation of Impaired Mobility with Spatial Navigation Ability in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis.

Spatial navigation ability is essential for independent living, and it relies on complex cognitive and motor processes that are vulnerable to decline in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The role of mobility in the physical act of navigation has been well documented; however, its association with cognitive processing that supports efficient navigation and recall of the environment is unknown. This study examined the relation between clinical mobility function and spatial navigation ability in pwMS. In a clinical sample of 43 individuals with relapsing-remitting MS (MPDDS = 2; age 25-67 years), we assessed spatial navigation ability in a virtual Morris water maze that allowed for active search by controlling a joystick while seated at a computer, and subsequent free recall of environment details. Individuals with worse mobility (measured by slower forward and backward walking) traveled less efficient virtual navigation routes to the goal location and recalled fewer accurate details of the environment. A stratified analysis by disability revealed moderate-strong correlations for those with a low level of disability, and effects were attenuated in individuals with a high level of disability. Given that the virtual navigation task was performed while seated, evidence of any correlation with mobility suggests differences in navigation ability that cannot be ascribed to general walking impairment, and instead suggests a role for mobility impairment to modify cognitive processing supporting navigation in pwMS.

Distinct disease-modifying therapies are associated with different blood immune cell profiles in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) used for treating people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS) target the immune system by different mechanisms of action. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive assessment of their effects on the immune system in comparison to treatment-naïve pwRRMS. Herein, we evaluated the numbers of circulating B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), natural killer (NK) cells and NKT cells, and their subsets, in pwRRMS who were treatment-naïve or treated with different DMTs. Compared to treatment-naïve pwRRMS, common and divergent effects on immune system cells were observed on pwRRMS treated with different DMTs, with no consistent pattern across all therapies in any of the cell populations analysed. PwRRMS treated with fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), or alemtuzumab have reduced numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as Treg subsets, with fingolimod causing the most pronounced decrease in T cell subsets. In contrast, teriflunomide and interferon (IFN) ß have minimal impact on T cells, and natalizumab marginally increases the number of memory T cells in the blood. The effect of DMTs on the B cell, NKT and NK cell subsets is highly variable with alemtuzumab inducing a strong increase in the number of the most immature NK cells and its subsets. This study comprehensively evaluates the magnitude of the effect of different DMTs on blood immune cells providing a better understanding of therapy outcome. Furthermore, the lack of a discernible pattern in the effects of DMTs on blood immune cells suggests that multiple immune cells can independently modulate the disease.

Predictive factors and treatment challenges in malignant progression of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Objective: Our objective was to uncover the predictive factors that can help anticipate the malignant progression of individuals with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Additionally, we sought to analyze and compare the response to treatment between patients with benign and malignant forms of RRMS. Methods: This cohort study included RRMS patients categorized as benign (≥10 years since disease onset, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ≤ 1) or malignant (≤5 years since disease onset, EDSS ≥6). Patients' data, including demographics, medical history, treatment, and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) scans, were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: Among the 254 patients diagnosed with RRMS, 174 were found to have benign RRMS, while the remaining 80 were diagnosed with malignant RRMS. Notably, patients with malignant RRMS exhibited a significantly higher mean age of onset (32.00 ± 7.96 vs. 25.70 ± 17.19; P < 0.001) and a greater prevalence of males (40% vs. 18.4%; P = 0.014). Additionally, within the initial five years of diagnosis, patients with malignant RRMS experienced a higher number of relapses (median: 4 vs. 2; P < 0.001) and hospitalizations (median: 2 vs. 1; P = 0.006) compared to those with benign RRMS. Clinical presentations of malignant RRMS were predominantly characterized by multifocal attacks, whereas unifocal attacks were more prevalent in patients with benign RRMS. MRI scans revealed that malignant RRMS patients displayed a higher burden of plaques in the infratentorial and cord regions, as well as a greater number of black hole lesions. Conversely, benign RRMS patients exhibited a higher number of Gadolinium-enhanced lesions. Utilizing Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) with an escalating approach has shown effectiveness in managing benign RRMS. However, it has proven insufficient in addressing malignant RRMS, resulting in frequent transitions to higher-line DMTs. As a result, it places a considerable burden on patients with malignant RRMS, consuming valuable time and resources, and ultimately yielding subpar outcomes. Conclusion: Our study identifies prognostic factors for malignant progression in RRMS, including older age of onset, male gender, increased relapses and hospitalizations, multifocal attacks, higher plaque load, and black hole lesions. The current escalation strategy for DMTs is insufficient for managing malignant RRMS, requiring alternative approaches for improved outcomes. In other words, MS is a spectrum rather than a single disease, and some patients progress to a malignant phenotype of MS that is not effectively treated by the current approach.