Are Clinically Node-Negative Patients with a Positive Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Biopsy Appropriate Candidates for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy?

BACKGROUND: Whether cN0 patients with image-detected nodal metastases are appropriate for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or should proceed directly to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. We sought to determine how often ALND is needed with upfront surgery and to identify factors associated with ≥ 3 positive SLNs after a positive preoperative lymph node (LN) biopsy. METHODS: Patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer and a positive LN biopsy treated from 2014 to 2022 were identified from a prospective database. Patients who received NAC were excluded. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between women with 1-2 positive SLNs and ≥ 3 positive SLNs. RESULTS: Of 90 eligible patients, 66 (73%) had 1-2 positive SLNs and 24 (27%) had ≥ 3 positive SLNs. The median patient age was 62 years, median tumor size was 2.2 cm, and 16 women (18%) received a mastectomy. There was no difference in body mass index, tumor size, histology, grade, multifocality, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and receptor status between groups. On multivariable analysis, having ≥ 3 positive SLNs was associated with > 1 abnormal LN on preoperative imaging (odds ratio [OR] 4.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-14.0; p = 0.01), microscopic extracapsular extension in the SLNs (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.25-13.7; p = 0.025), and a higher median number of SLNs removed (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-1.88; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: More than 70% of women with cT1-2 breast cancer with image-detected nodal metastases had < 3 positive SLNs and did not require ALND. To avoid multiple trips to the operating room, frozen section can be considered in women with multiple abnormal LNs on imaging.

Trends and efficacy of omitting axillary lymph node dissection in early-stage male breast cancer with limited nodal involvement: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in managing early-stage male breast cancer (MBC) patients with T1-2 tumors and limited lymph node metastasis, all receiving radiotherapy, remains uncertain. This study examines trends and survival outcomes for SLNB and ALND in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from 2010 to 2020 for MBC patients with T1-2 tumors and 1-2 positive lymph nodes undergoing radiotherapy. Patients were classified by nodes removed (SLNB ≤5, ALND ≥10), comparing overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the groups before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of 299 MBC patients analyzed, SLNB usage increased from 18.8% in 2010 to 61.0% in 2020. Multivariable logistic regression highlighted significant associations of SLNB use with diagnosis year, race, surgery type, positive lymph node count, and metastasis size. No significant differences in 5-year OS (77.98% SLNB vs. 85.85% ALND, p = 0.337) or BCSS (91.54% SLNB vs. 94.97% ALND, p = 0.214) were observed. Propensity score matching (96 patients per group) confirmed similar 5-year OS (83.9% for SLNB vs. 82.0% for ALND, p = 0.925) and BCSS (90.1% for SLNB vs. 96.9% for ALND, p = 0.167). CONCLUSION: SLNB and ALND provide comparable survival outcomes in early-stage MBC patients with limited lymph node metastasis undergoing radiotherapy. The increased utilization of SLNB supports its consideration to reduce surgical morbidity in selected MBC patients despite limited direct evidence.

Assessing para-aortic nodal status in high-grade endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) in detecting positive para-aortic (PA) lymph nodes in high-grade uterine cancer, and to determine the recurrence rate in patients with high-grade uterine cancers who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy based on negative pelvic SLNs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed, high-grade endometrial cancer who underwent surgery, including pelvic SLNs with or without PA node dissection, at a tertiary care institution between 2015 and 2020. Baseline demographics, surgical management, pathology data, and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and survival analysis. RESULTS: Postoperative histology of the 110 patients meeting inclusion criteria was 45.5% grade 3 endometrioid, 36.4% serous, 10.9% clear cell, and 7.3% carcinosarcoma. On final pathology, 63.7% were stage 1, and 23.6% were stage 3C with positive nodes. A total of 63 patients (57.3%) had a PA lymph node dissection (56 bilateral, 7 unilateral) in addition to the pelvic SLN. Among this group, 5.8% (95% confidence interval 1.2%-16.0%) had a positive PA node despite a negative pelvic SLN. Among those with a negative pelvic SLN and no adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 75), the rate of distant recurrence was 14.7%, and 3-year recurrence-free survival was 71.9%. CONCLUSION: The rate of isolated PA node metastasis in high-grade endometrial cancers despite a negative pelvic SLN may be significantly higher than the accepted rate of isolated PA node metastasis in low-grade endometrial cancer. This supports adjuvant treatment decisions continuing to incorporate primary tumor pathology and molecular classification.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective single-center analysis.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is increasingly incorporated in European national guidelines for the management of the clinically node-negative neck (cN0) in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). In Germany, SLNB in OSCCs is not yet routinely performed. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of SLNB in a German cohort. Patients with primary early-stage OSCC who underwent tumor resection and SLNB were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical-pathological characteristics were documented. Primary endpoints were sensitivity and the negative predictive value (NPV). A total of 46 patients with a mean age of 62.3 (±14.5) years met the inclusion criteria. Most tumors were located in the tongue (63.0%). Bilateral drainage from a lateral tumor was observed in three cases (6.5%), and sentinel lymph node metastasis was detected in three patients (6.5%). Mean follow-up for all patients was 13.8 months (±9.6). One patient developed regional recurrence following a negative SLNB during the observation period, leading to an NPV of 0.98 and a sensitivity of 75.0%. The 2-year neck-specific relapse-free survival was 92.8%. SLNB in early-stage OSCC is a reliable diagnostic tool of the cN0 neck, ensuring a high NPV and RFS. SLNB can be advantageous in comparison to elective neck dissection due to the detection of contralateral lymph drainage.

Individualized prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Chinese breast cancer patients with ≥ 3 positive sentinel lymph nodes based on machine-learning algorithms.

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a standard procedure for early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients with three or more positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). However, ALND can lead to significant postoperative complications without always providing additional clinical benefits. This study aims to develop machine-learning (ML) models to predict non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in Chinese BC patients with three or more positive SLNs, potentially allowing the omission of ALND. METHODS: Data from 2217 BC patients who underwent SLN biopsy at Shantou University Medical College were analyzed, with 634 having positive SLNs. Patients were categorized into those with ≤ 2 positive SLNs and those with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. We applied nine ML algorithms to predict non-SLN metastasis. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, precision-recall curves, and calibration curves. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) assessed the clinical utility of the models. RESULTS: The RF model showed superior predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.987 in the training set and 0.828 in the validation set. Key predictive features included size of positive SLNs, tumor size, number of SLNs, and ER status. In external validation, the RF model achieved an AUC of 0.870, demonstrating robust predictive capabilities. CONCLUSION: The developed RF model accurately predicts non-SLN metastasis in BC patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs, suggesting that ALND might be avoided in selected patients by applying additional axillary radiotherapy. This approach could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve patient quality of life. Further validation in prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Evaluating the feasibility of repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy in ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: Technical considerations and oncologic outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) remains a concern despite standard treatments. Advances in early detection have shifted surgical paradigms towards less invasive approaches. While repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy (rSLNB) emerges as a viable option according to the 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, its efficacy remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess lymphatic drainage patterns in IBTR and evaluate the feasibility of rSLNB, along with analyzing oncologic outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis involving 78 patients with IBTR who had prior breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) at Samsung Medical Center was conducted. Data on patient characteristics, lymphatic mapping techniques, and oncologic outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among 78 patients with IBTR, 82.1 % underwent successful rSLNB, predominantly detecting lymphatic drainage to the ipsilateral axilla (80.8 %). The initial tumor location correlated significantly with failed lymphatic mapping (p = 0.019). A third event occurred in 28.8 % of invasive IBTR cases, notably associated with postmenopausal status, higher T stages, and HR(-)/HER2(-) subtype (p < 0.001). The risk of a third event increased by over 50 % within a 2-year interval post-IBTR. CONCLUSION: rSLNB in patients with IBTR, particularly for tumors initially located outside the upper-outer quadrant, demonstrated technical feasibility. The combined use of blue dye with lymphoscintigraphy may enhance rSLNB success rates. Active surveillance, especially for triple negative IBTR cases, may be important due to their aggressive nature and rapid progression potential within a short interval post-IBTR.

Optimal management of breast cancer with physical exam negative/radiological abnormal axilla.

For breast cancer patients with physical exam node negative but radiological finding node abnormal (cN0/rNa), the NCCN and ASCO guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as the first-line axillary staging. However, patients who undergo surgery firstly may be upstaged to pathological II-III status, and these patients happen to be the adaptive population of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). There is no consensus on the optimal management of cN0/rNa patients. The aim is to explore the optimal management strategy of these patients. We performed a retrospective real-world study of 1414 cN0/rNa patients from June 2014 to October 2022. There were 1003 patients underwent surgery first and 411 patients underwent surgery after NAT. We analyzed the real-world conditions of these patients, compared axilla tumor burden between these two groups. In addition, we compared benefit ratio of axillary surgery and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) de-escalation under the two strategies. Among 1003 patients underwent surgery first, the positive and negative rates of fine needle aspiration (FNA) were 18.5% and 81.5%, respectively. There were 66.1% had ≤ 2 lymph nodes+. There were 40.8% of FNA+ patients could be exempted from ALND underwent surgery first. In 411 patients underwent surgery after NAT, the FNA positive and negative rates were 60.8% and 49.2%, respectively. There were 54.4% of FNA+ patients achieved axilla pathologic complete response (apCR) and could omit ALND after NAT. The apCR was 67.3% in HER2+/TNBC subtypes. According to the NSABP-B51 trial, there were 0 and 54.4% of FNA+ patients could omit RNI among surgery first and after NAT, respectively. Among 1-2 sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive patients underwent surgery first, with a median follow-up 49 months, there was no difference of survival benefit between SLNB-only and SLNB-ALND. Compared with 1-2 SLN+ patients without RNI, RNI could bring better invasive disease-free survival (97.38% vs. 89.36%, P = 0.046) and breast cancer special survival (100% vs. 94.68%, P = 0.020). It is safe to perform SLNB omitting ALND when detected 1-2 positive SLNs in cN0/rNa patients. Patients with HER2+/TNBC subtypes underwent surgery after NAT had more chance to benefit from dual de-escalation, including axillary surgery and RNI de-escalation.

Retrieval of the Clipped Axillary Lymph Node and Its Impact on Treatment Decisions.

We examined clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and clipped lymph node (CLN) localization to determine the rate of CLN = non-sentinel lymph node (SLN), the factors associated with cN+ to pN0 conversion, and the treatment impact. We conducted a single institution review of cN+ patients receiving NAC from 2016 to 2022 with preoperative CLN localization (N = 81). Demographics, hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status, time to surgery, staging, chemotherapy regimen, localization method, pathology, and adjuvant therapy were analyzed. Pathologic complete response (pCR) of the CLN was observed in 41 patients (50.6%): 18.8% HR+/HER2-, 75% HR+/HER2+, 75% HR-/HER2+, and 62.5% triple-negative breast cancer (p-value = 0.006). CLN = SLN in 68 (84%) patients, while CLN = non-SLN in 13 (16%). In 14 (17.3%) patients, the final treatment was altered based on +CLN status: 11 patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and 3 had systemic treatment changes. pCR rates varied, with the highest conversion rates observed in HER2+ disease and the lowest in HR+/HER2- disease. In 2 (2.5%) patients, adjuvant therapy changes were made based on a non-sentinel CLN, while in 97.5% of patients, a SLN biopsy alone represented the status of the axilla. This demonstrates that a +CLN often alters final plans and that, despite also being a SLN in most cases, a subset of patients will be undertreated by SLN biopsy alone.

Applying the SOUND Trial for Omitting Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in Bahrain.

Objective: The Sentinel Node vs. Observation After Axillary Ultra-Sound (SOUND) trial reported that omission of axillary surgery was not inferior to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in those with cT1 breast cancer and negative preoperative axillary ultrasound. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of early breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) at our institution in order to investigate the exportability of SOUND criteria to our patient population. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with cT1N0 breast cancer undergoing BCS and adjuvant radiotherapy according to the SOUND trial criteria. Comparison was made between the eligible group of our cohort and the SLNB arm of the SOUND trial. Results: The proportion of younger patients was higher in our eligible cohort (37.7% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.002). Postmenopausal patients were more prevalent in the SOUND trial (79.4% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.004). On final pathology, tumours were more likely to be upgraded to T2 in our group (26.4% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.001). Patients in our cohort were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (37.7% vs. 20.1%, p = 0.002). Conclusion: The clinicopathological differences between our cohort and the SOUND trial population could be attributed to aggressive tumours in Bahrain compared to Western countries. Our study may influence others to investigate the applicability of the SOUND trial in clinical practice. Nevertheless, it is a study that should generate multidisciplinary discussion in the de-escalation of axillary surgery.

Incidental detection of non-melanoma neoplasms in sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma staging: A retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Patients with malignant melanoma have an increased risk of developing secondary hematologic malignancy, and patients with hematologic malignancies have an increased risk of developing melanoma. Rarely, sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) collected for melanoma staging might harbor lymphoma or even carcinoma, which may represent a second primary malignancy (SPM). Biopsied lymph node(s) might serve as the first site of recognition for a SPM. Yet, there has been little systematic investigation regarding the characteristics of incidental SPMs detected on SLNB for melanoma staging. METHODS: A series of cases of lymphomas and carcinomas were detected incidentally during SLNB for melanoma staging from two tertiary academic centers between 2000 and 2021. RESULTS: Fifteen cases of incidentally detected SPMs were reviewed, comprising 12 lymphomas and three carcinomas. The most common incidentally detected second malignancy was chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (60%, 9/15). There were three cases of incidentally detected metastatic carcinoma. Of all incidentally detected malignancies, 2/3 carcinomas and 4/12 lymphomas represented first-time diagnoses of SPM in a melanoma patient. Forty percent of cases (6/15) also harbored metastatic melanoma in the sentinel lymph node. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to incidentally detect SPMs in SLNBs for melanoma staging. Early detection of SPMs in melanoma patients has implications for the treatment of both incidental SPM and melanoma.

De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

BACKGROUNDS: This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.

Integrating the melanoma 31-gene expression profile test with clinical and pathologic features can provide personalized precision estimates for sentinel lymph node positivity: an independent performance cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 88% of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) are negative. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test can help identify patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis who can safely forego SLNB. The 31-GEP classifies patients as low (Class 1 A), intermediate (Class 1B/2A), or high risk (Class 2B) for recurrence, metastasis, and SLN positivity. The integrated 31-GEP (i31-GEP) combines the 31-GEP risk score with clinicopathologic features using a neural network algorithm to personalize SLN risk prediction. METHODS: Patients from a single surgical center with 31-GEP results were included (n = 156). An i31-GEP risk prediction < 5% was considered low risk of SLN positivity. Chi-square was used to compare SLN positivity rates between groups. RESULTS: Patients considered low risk by the i31-GEP had a 0% (0/30) SLN positivity rate compared to a 31.9% (30/94, p < 0.001) positivity rate in those with > 10% risk. Using the i31-GEP to guide SLNB decisions could have significantly reduced the number of unnecessary SLNBs by 19.2% (30/156, p < 0.001) for all patients and 33.0% (30/91, p < 0.001) for T1-T2 tumors. Patients with T1-T2 tumors and an i31-GEP-predicted SLN positivity risk > 10% had a similar SLN positivity rate (33.3%) as patients with T3-T4 tumors (31.3%). CONCLUSION: The i31-GEP identified patients with < 5% risk of SLN positivity who could safely forego SLNB. Combining the 31-GEP with clinicopathologic features for a precise risk estimate can help guide risk-aligned patient care decisions for SLNB to reduce the number of unnecessary SLNBs and increase the SLNB positivity yield if the procedure is performed.

A Multimodal Protocol Combining 99mTc-Tilmanocept with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Lympho-Angiography for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Oral Cancer: A Case Series.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is currently considered as a viable alternative to elective neck dissection (END) for the management of cN0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). However, some difficulties were detected in sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification in floor of mouth (FOM) and ventral tongue tumors because of the so-called "shine-through radioactivity" of the injection site, which may mask nodal hotspots in proximity. We assessed the feasibility and the potential strengths of combining 99mTc-Tilmanocept with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence lympho-angiography in a dedicated multimodal protocol for SLNB in T1/T2N0 oral cancer to evaluate the synergistic role of each of these two tracers in providing the appropriate sensitivity and ease of learning, even in such a critical anatomical subsite. A detailed, stepwise description of our multimodal protocol is provided, together with the presentation of its application in two cases of early-stage ventral tongue tumors. Radioactive guidance with 99mTc-Tilmanocept was used preoperatively to perform planar lymphoscintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography and to define the nodal hotspot(s) and the surgical "roadmap". In addition, it was used intraoperatively to pinpoint the SLN location within each nodal hotspot with high specificity but limited spatial resolution. Optical guidance with ICG injection at the tumor bed and near-infrared fluorescence imaging was then added, providing intuitive intraoperative guidance within each nodal hotspot with high spatial resolution. Our small experience with this protocol is illustrated and future perspectives are highlighted.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Older Patients: Does SLNB Guide Therapy?

BACKGROUND: Older breast cancer patients represent a heterogeneous population. Studies demonstrate that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission may be appropriate in some clinical scenarios, yet patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are often excluded from these studies. This study evaluated differences in treatment and survival for older patients with TNBC based on SLNB receipt and result. METHODS: Patients 70 years old or older with a diagnosis of cT1-2/cN0/M0 TNBC (2010-2019) who underwent surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database. Logistic regression estimated the association of SLNB with therapy, and Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association of SLNB with overall survival (OS) after adjustment for select factors. RESULTS: Of the 15,167 patients included in the study (median age, 77 years), 13.02% did not undergo SLNB, 5.14% had pN1 disease, 0.12% had pN2 disease, and 0.01% had pN3 disease. Most of the patients (83.9%) underwent surgery first, and 16.1% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of those who underwent surgery first and SLNB, 6.2% had pN+ disease. Receipt of SLNB was associated with a higher likelihood of chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-2.21), regardless of pN status. Compared with those who did not undergo a SLNB, a negative SLNB was significantly associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.63-0.75), although there was no difference for a positive SLNB (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.98-1.34). The patients receiving chemotherapy first showed no difference in survival based on SLNB receipt or result (p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Most older patients with TNBC do not have nodal involvement and do not receive chemotherapy. The receipt and results of SLNB may be associated with outcomes for some who undergo surgery first, but not for those who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Management of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Can Axillary Needle Biopsy Replace Sentinel Node Biopsy?

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate whether it is possible to evaluate the axilla after treatment without performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node metastases who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, clinically designed study included patients with clinical T1-3 and biopsy-proven N1 breast cancer. Prior to the surgery scheduled after NAC, the patients were randomized into two groups. A biopsy sample was obtained from the clipped axillary lymph node, which was preoperatively known to be metastatic, using fine needle aspiration (FNAB) in the first group and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the second group. The predictive ability of the two biopsy methods for the SLNB results was evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 50 female patients with breast cancer, with a mean age of 48.4±10.72 years. In both groups, metastasis was detected in nine patients, and no metastasis was seen in 14 patients. In intergroup comparisons, all patients with metastasis in the FNAB group also had metastasis according to SLNB, while 21.4% of the cases without metastasis in this group were metastatic according to SLNB. In the CNB group, metastasis was observed in all patients with metastasis according to SLNB, while no metastasis was detected in those who were reported to have no metastasis by SLNB. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity values for the prediction of SLNB results were all found to be 100% for CNB, whereas they were 87%, 100%, and 75%, respectively, for FNAB. CONCLUSION: Both CNB and FNAB could potentially replace SLNB due to their high accuracy rates in evaluating the axilla after NAC. The sensitivity and accuracy of CNB were determined to be higher.

New Insight for Axillary De-Escalation in Breast Cancer Surgery: "SoFT Study" Retrospective Analysis.

Background: The SOUND study demonstrated that an axillary de-escalation may be sufficient in locoregional and distant disease control in selected early breast cancer (EBC) patients. To establish any preoperative variables that may drive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission, a study named sentinel omission risk factor (SOFT) 1.23 was planned. Methods: A single-center retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database was designed, aiming at underlying preoperative prognostic factors involved in sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis (lymph node involvement (LN+) vs. negative lymph node (LN-) group). Secondary outcomes included surgical room occupancy analysis for SLNB in patients fulfilling the SOUND study inclusion criteria. The institutional ethical committee Area Territoriale Lazio 2 approved the study (n° 122/23). Results: Between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023, 160 patients were included in the study and 26 (%) were included in the LN+ group. Multifocality, higher cT stage, and larger tumor diameter were reported in the LN+ group (p = 0.020, p = 0.014, and 0.016, respectively). Tumor biology, including estrogen and progesterone receptors, and molecular subtypes showed association with the LN+ group (p < 0.001; p = 0.001; and p = 0.001, respectively). A total of 117 (73.6%) patients were eligible for the SOUND study and the potential operating room time saved was 2696.81 min. Conclusions: De-escalating strategies may rationalize healthcare activities. Multifactorial risk stratification may further refine the selection of patients who could benefit from SLNB omission.

Survival Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

To assess whether there were statistically significant differences in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone as a nodal assessment method in patients with early-stage cervical cancer (IA1 with ILV to IB2 or IIA1 of the FIGO 2018 classification). A retrospective study was conducted among patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery with pelvic lymph node assessment at La Paz University Hospital between 2005 and 2022. For nodal staging, either PL, SLNB + PL, or exclusive SLNB were performed, depending on the time period. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared between the PL and SLNB groups. Predictors of bilateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection were identified with Cox proportional hazard models. Among the 128 patients included, PL ± SLNB was performed in 79 (61.7%) patients and exclusive SLNB in 49 (38.3%) patients. There was no difference between PL and SLNB in OS (log-rank 0.0730) or PFS (log-rank 0.0189). Lower limb lymphedema (LLL) was significantly lower in the SLNB group (p = 0.001). Pelvic nodal assessment with SLNB alone did not worsen survival rates compared with the standard PL in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, and it is associated with a lower rate of LLL.