Feasibility of a simultaneously integrated boost concept for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of unresected brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: In stereotactic radiotherapy, dose is prescribed to an isodose surrounding the planning target volume (PTV). However, the desired dose inhomogeneity inside the PTV leaves the specific dose distribution to the gross tumor volume (GTV) unspecified. A simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) to the GTV could solve this shortcoming. In a retrospective planning study with 20 unresected brain metastases, a SIB approach was tested against the classical prescription. METHODS: For all metastases, the GTV was isotropically enlarged by 3 mm to a PTV. Two plans were generated, one according to the classical 80% concept with 5 times 7 Gy prescribed (on D2%) to the 80% PTV surrounding isodose (with D98%(PTV) ≥ 35 Gy), and the other one following a SIB concept with 5 times 8.5 Gy average GTV dose and with D98%(PTV) ≥ 35 Gy as additional requirement. Plan pairs were compared in terms of homogeneity inside GTV, high dose in PTV rim around GTV, and dose conformity and gradients around PTV using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. RESULTS: The SIB concept was superior to the classical 80% concept concerning dose homogeneity inside GTV: Heterogeneity index of GTV was in the SIB concept (median 0.0513, range 0.0397-0.0757) significantly (p = 0.001) lower than in the 80% concept (median 0.0894, range 0.0447-0.1872). Dose gradients around PTV were not inferior. The other examined measures were comparable. CONCLUSION: Our stereotactic SIB concept better defines the dose distribution inside PTV and can be considered for clinical use.

Microbeam Irradiation as a Simultaneously Integrated Boost in a Conventional Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Protocol.

Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT), an experimental high-dose rate concept with spatial fractionation at the micrometre range, has shown a high therapeutic potential as well as good preservation of normal tissue function in pre-clinical studies. We investigated the suitability of MRT as a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) in conventional whole-brain irradiation (WBRT). A 174 Gy MRT SIB was administered with an array of quasi-parallel, 50 µm wide microbeams spaced at a centre-to-centre distance of 400 µm either on the first or last day of a 5 × 4 Gy radiotherapy schedule in healthy adult C57 BL/6J mice and in F98 glioma cell cultures. The animals were observed for signs of intracranial pressure and focal neurologic signs. Colony counts were conducted in F98 glioma cell cultures. No signs of acute adverse effects were observed in any of the irradiated animals within 3 days after the last irradiation fraction. The tumoricidal effect on F98 cell in vitro was higher when the MRT boost was delivered on the first day of the irradiation course, as opposed to the last day. Therefore, the MRT SIB should be integrated into a clinical radiotherapy schedule as early as possible.

Safety of pre- or postoperative accelerated radiotherapy in 5 fractions: A randomized pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy (NART) for breast cancer has shown promising survival results in retrospective trials. However, there are some obstacles such as a chemotherapy delay, an increased overall treatment time (OTT) and the risk of increasing surgical morbidity. Accelerated radiotherapy (RT) in 5 fractions allows to deliver NART in a very short time span and minimizes the delay of surgery and chemotherapy. This trial investigates this NART schedule for safety, feasibility and OTT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients eligible for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and breast conserving surgery, were randomized between NART before NACT or NACT and postoperative RT. In both arms, RT treatment was given in 5 fractions to the whole breast with a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) on the tumor(bed). Lymph node irradiation was given concomitantly in case of lymph node involvement. OTT was defined as the time from diagnosis to last surgery in the intervention group, while in the control group the time between diagnosis and last RT-fraction was used. In the intervention group NACT-delay was defined as time between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: 20 patients were included, and 19 patients completed treatment. OTT was significantly shorter in the intervention group (mean 218 days, range 196-253) compared to the control group (mean 237, range 211-268, p = 0.001). The difference in mean duration from diagnosis to the first treatment was a non-significant 4 days longer (31 vs 27 days, p = 0.28), but the start of NACT after diagnosis was delayed by 21 days (48 vs 27 days, p < 0.001). NART did not result in additional surgery complications. CONCLUSION: This pilot trial is the first to report on accelerated NART in 5 fractions with SIB. NART before NACT resulted in a shorter OTT with good safety results.

Automated hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (HVMAT) for whole-breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost to lumpectomy area : A treatment planning study.

PURPOSE: To develop an automated treatment planning approach for whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost using an automated hybrid VMAT class solution (HVMAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with left breast cancer received 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to the whole breast and an additional simultaneous 10 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction) to the tumor cavity. Ipsilateral lung, heart, and contralateral breast were contoured as main organs-at-risk. HVMAT plans were inversely optimized by combining two open fields with a VMAT semi-arc beam. Open fields were setup to include the whole breast with a 2 cm flash region and to carry 80% of beams weight. HVMAT plans were compared with three tangential techniques: conventional wedged-field tangential plans (SWF), field-in-field forward planned tangential plans (FiF), and hybrid-IMRT plans (HMRT). Dosimetric differences among the plans were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Dose accuracy was validated using the PTW Octavius-4D phantom together with the 1500 2D-array. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among the four techniques for both targets coverage. HVMAT plans showed consistently better PTVs dose contrast, conformity, and homogeneity (p < 0.001 for all metrics) and statistically significant reduction of high-dose breast irradiation. V55 and V60 decreased by 30.4, 26.1, and 20.8% (p < 0.05) and 12.3, 9.9, and 6.0% (p < 0.05) for SWF, FIF, and HMRT, respectively. Pretreatment dose verification reported a gamma pass-rate greater than the acceptance threshold of 95% for all HVMAT plans. In addition, HVMAT reduced the time for full planning optimization to about 20 min. CONCLUSIONS: HVMAT plans resulted in superior target dose conformity and homogeneity compared to other tangential techniques. Due to fast planning time HVMAT can be applied for all patients, minimizing the impact on human or departmental resources.

Quality of life after simultaneously integrated boost with intensity-modulated versus conventional radiotherapy with sequential boost for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: 2-year results of the multicenter randomized IMRT-MC2 trial.

BACKGROUND: We recently published 2-year results of the prospective, randomized IMRT-MC2 trial, showing non-inferior local control and cosmesis in breast cancer patients after conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneously integrated boost (IMRT-SIB), compared to 3D-conformal radiotherapy with sequential boost (3D-CRT-seqB). Here, we report on 2-year quality of life results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 502 patients were enrolled and randomized to IMRT-SIB (50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions with a 64.4 Gy SIB to the tumor bed) or to 3D-CRT-seqB (50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions, followed by a sequential boost of 16 Gy in 2 Gy fractions). For quality of life (QoL) assessment, patients completed the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks and 2 years after radiotherapy. RESULTS: Significant differences between treatment arms were seen 6 weeks after radiotherapy for pain (22.3 points for IMRT vs. 27.0 points for 3D-CRT-seqB; p = 0.033) and arm symptoms (18.1 points for IMRT vs. 23.6 points for 3D-CRT-seqB; p = 0.013), both favoring IMRT-SIB. Compared to baseline values, both arms showed significant improvement in global score (IMRT: p = 0.009; 3D-CRT: p = 0.001) after 2 years, with slight deterioration on the role (IMRT: p = 0.008; 3-D-CRT: p = 0.001) and social functioning (IMRT: p = 0.013, 3D-CRT: p = 0.001) as well as the future perspectives scale (IMRT: p = 0.003; 3D-CRT: p = 0.0034). CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized phase III trial demonstrating that IMRT-SIB was associated with slightly superior QoL compared to 3-D-CRT-seqB. These findings further support the clinical implementation of SIB in adjuvant breast cancer treatment.

Dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost photon or proton therapy in pancreatic cancer in an in-silico study: Gastrointestinal organs remain critical.

PURPOSE: To compare the dosimetric results of an in-silico study among intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) treatment techniques using a dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) approach in locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each of 15 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients, a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a Tomotherapy (TOMO), and an IMPT treatment plan was optimized on free-breathing treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images. For the photon treatment plans, doses of 66 Gy and 51 Gy, both as SIB in 30 fractions, were prescribed to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and to the planning target volume (PTV), respectively. For the proton plans, a dose prescription of 66 Gy(RBE) to the GTV and of 51 Gy(RBE) to the clinical target volume (CTV) was planned. For each SIB-treatment plan, doses to the targets and OARs were evaluated and statistically compared. RESULTS: All treatment techniques reached the prescribed doses to the GTV and CTV or PTV. The stomach and the bowel, in particular the duodenum and the small bowel, were found to be frequently exposed to doses exceeding 50 Gy, irrespective of the treatment technique. For doses below 50 Gy, the IMPT technique was statistically significant superior to both IMRT techniques regarding decreasing dose to the OARs, e.g. volume of the bowel receiving 15 Gy (V 15Gy) was reduced for IMPT compared to VMAT (p = 0.003) and TOMO (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With all photon and proton techniques investigated, the radiation dose to gastrointestinal OARs remained critical when treating patients with unresectable locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer using a dose-escalated SIB approach.

Image-guided hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost and adaptive radiotherapy for spine metastasis.

BACKGROUND: (I) Dosimetric comparison between Helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with hypofractionated simultaneously integrated boost (HF-SIB) technique for spine metastasis. (II) Mega-voltage CT (MVCT) imaging can be used to monitor changes and calculate the true spinal cord dose over multiple fractions, and compare it with the planned dose by deformable image registration. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 57 patients with spine metastasis receiving HT at our institution between March 2016 and March 2019. (I) The dose/fraction to planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were 40 or 50 Gy/10 fractions and 30 or 40 Gy/10 fractions. Plans were compared according to PTV coverage and OARs sparing. (II) The daily MVCT were strictly registered with plan CT according to the rigid structures. Contours of the target and critical organs were then deformed from plan CT to MVCT using MIM deformable registration algorithm. After rigid imaging registration, the planning dose matrix was mapped to the MVCT images. The total doses of 10 fractions to the deformed structures were compared with the planned doses. RESULTS: Comparing HT and IMRT plan averaged over all patients, differences were observed for both homogeneity index (HI) (P<0.001) and conformity index (CI) (P=0.032). The maximum dose of the spinal cord was significantly lower in the HT group than the IMRT group (P=0.037). The actual dose of the spinal cord obtained based on the MVCT modified adaptive radiation therapy (ART) was slightly higher than the initially planned dose, while no significant difference was observed (P=0.083). CONCLUSIONS: HF-SIB with HT was able to achieve lower spinal cord doses, which was dosimetrically superior to IMRT, especially in those cases where strict control of the spinal cord dose is required. With deformable contours from the planning CT, daily MVCT along with rigid dose transformation can provide quantitative dose guidance for replanning.

Adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for early stage breast cancer : Results from a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To report early toxicity and 5­year clinical outcomes of adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneously integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) after breast-conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 467 patients including 406 invasive breast cancer and 61 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were enrolled in a single institutional phase II trial. All patients underwent IMRT-SIB treatment to irradiate the whole breast and the tumor bed. Doses to whole breast and surgical bed were 45 and 60 Gy, respectively, delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The grade of maximum acute skin toxicity during treatment was recorded. Lung toxicity was noted within 6 months and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were recorded at the 12 month follow-up after the end of radiotherapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed during follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 5.46 years. Median age was 46 years old (range 22-70 years old). No patient with DCIS had a local recurrence or distant metastasis. Among 406 patients with invasive breast cancer, the unadjusted 5­year actuarial rate of locoregional control was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.5-100), and distant metastasis-free survival 98.7% (95% CI 97.4-100), respectively. Acute skin toxicity was recorded at grade 0-1 in 76.5% of patients, and grade 2 in 23.5% of patients. None of these patients had grade 3 or more than grade 3 skin toxicity. Grade 1 pneumonitis was found in 25.3% of patients. Assessment of patient reported cosmetic outcomes at the 12 month follow-up showed good or excellent outcome in 86.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inversely planned IMRT-SIB as part of breast-conserving therapy results in optimal 5­year tumor control and minor early toxicities.

Normal tissue sparing using different techniques for prostate irradiation.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate normal tissue sparing through dosimetric parameters of normal tissue volumes using different irradiation techniques for conventional (CFRT) and simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) schedules. BACKGROUND: Several dose-escalation studies for localized prostate cancer (PCa) have shown advanced biochemical relapse-free (bRFS) rates and also better local control for higher total doses using either CFRT or SIB schedules. Besides the most important organs-at-risk, absorbed dose reduction of other surrounding normal tissues are also preferable. In order to analyse the normal tissue sparing, dosimetric parameters of different normal tissue volumes were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans for 15 high risk prostate cancer patients were created using RapidArc (RA), Sliding Window (SW) IMRT and 4-field box (3D-CRT) technique. In order to evaluate normal tissue sparing, the volume of pelvic region was divided into six normal tissue cylinders with 1 cm wall thickness, located in each other. RESULTS: All plans met the criteria of target coverage (V95%>95%). All techniques provided the same results for OARs except 3D-CRT for rectum and bilateral femoral heads. The values of V5, V10 and V15 increased in cases which included RapidArc technique and decreased for V20 and V30. CONCLUSIONS: The dosimetric parameters for the cylindrical normal tissue volumes show that using RapidArc technique gives equal or slightly better normal tissue sparing and SIB provided the same normal tissue sparing as CFRT planned with RapidArc.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy by simultaneously integrated boost volumetric-modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma-toxicity/quality of life and survival.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the toxicity, changes of quality of life (QOL), and survival for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with simultaneously integrated boost volumetric-modulated arc therapy (SIB-VMAT). METHODS: A total of 68 NPC patients treated by CCRT with SIB-VMAT technique were collected. QOL was longitudinally assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and HN35 questionnaires at the 4 time points: baseline, 42.4 Gy (20 fractions), and 3, 12 months after CCRT. RESULTS: The 4-year locoregional relapse free, distant metastasis free, failure free, and overall survival rates were 97.0%, 86.4%, 82.0%, and 88.1%, respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence rate of late toxicities with grade 3 or more was 3.0%. One year after CCRT, most QOL scales, except some oral related symptoms, recovered to baseline level. CONCLUSION: CCRT with SIB-VMAT produces excellent locoregional control, few severe late toxicity, and good general health status for NPC patients.

Advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is a common type of malignancy worldwide and usually requires multidisciplinary care. Radiotherapy plays an important part in management of the disease. During the past few years, researchers have made much progress about radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, which was revealed in every aspect of clinical practice. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to show less toxicities and non-inferior prognosis. What's more, definitive chemoradiotherapy could be an option for non-surgical candidates and good responders to chemoradiotherapy. Advances in radiation techniques result in higher conformity, homogeneity, more normal tissue sparing and less treatment time. Promising prognoses and less toxicities were also seen in advanced techniques. As radiation dose higher than 50 Gy obtains better local control and survival, simultaneously integrated boost is designed to increase primary tumor dosage and keep prophylactic dose to subclinical areas. Elective nodal irradiation brings about better local control but do not show advantages in survival compared with involved field irradiation (IFI). As a trend, more tolerable chemoradiotherapy regimen would be taken into account in dealing with elderly patients.

Is it possible for knowledge-based planning to improve intensity modulated radiation therapy plan quality for planners with different planning experiences in left-sided breast cancer patients?

BACKGROUND: Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a promising technique that can improve plan quality and increase planning efficiency. However, no attempts have been made to extend the domain of KBP for planners with different planning experiences so far. The purpose of this study was to quantify the potential gains for planners with different planning experiences after implementing KBP in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for left-sided breast cancer patients. METHODS: The model libraries were populated with 80 expert clinical plans from treated patients who previously received left-sided breast-conserving surgery and IMRT with simultaneously integrated boost. The libraries were created on the RapidPlanTM. 6 planners with different planning experiences (2 beginner planners, 2 junior planners and 2 senior planners) generated manual and KBP optimized plans for additional 10 patients, similar to those included in the model libraries. The plan qualities were compared between manual and KBP plans. RESULTS: All plans were capable of achieving the prescription requirement. There were almost no statistically significant differences in terms of the planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose conformality. It was demonstrated that the doses for most of organs-at-risk (OARs) were on average lower or equal in KBP plans compared to manual plans except for the senior planners, where the very small differences were not statistically significant. KBP data showed a systematic trend to have superior dose sparing at most parameters for the heart and ipsilateral lung. The observed decrease in the doses to these OARs could be achieved, particularly for the beginner and junior planners. Many differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to generate acceptable IMRT plans after implementing KBP for left-sided breast cancer. KBP helps to effectively improve the quality of IMRT plans against the benchmark of manual plans for less experienced planners without any manual intervention. KBP showed promise for homogenizing the plan quality by transferring planning expertise from more experienced to less experienced planners.

Dosimetric evaluation of simultaneous integrated boost during stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides a promising way to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the region of vessel abutment or encasement during SBRT has the potential to downstage otherwise likely positive surgical margins. Despite the potential benefit of using SIB-SBRT, the ability to boost is limited by the local geometry of the organs at risk (OARs), such as stomach, duodenum, and bowel (SDB), relative to tumor. In this study, we have retrospectively replanned 20 patients with 25Gy prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) and 33~80Gy to the boost target volume (BTV) using an SIB technique for all patients. The number of plans and patients able to satisfy a set of clinically established constraints is analyzed. The ability to boost vessels (within the gross target volume [GTV]) is shown to correlate with the overlap volume (OLV), defined to be the overlap between the GTV + a 1(OLV1)- or 2(OLV2)-cm margin with the union of SDB. Integral dose, boost dose contrast (BDC), biologically effective BDC, tumor control probability for BTV, and normal tissue complication probabilities are used to analyze the dosimetric results. More than 65% of the cases can deliver a boost to 40Gy while satisfying all OAR constraints. An OLV2 of 100cm(3) is identified as the cutoff volume: for cases with OLV2 larger than 100cm(3), it is very unlikely the case could achieve 25Gy to the PTV while successfully meeting all the OAR constraints.