Descriptors and factors affecting patients' symptom experiences for symptom self-management throughout palliative radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer: A systematic review.

Objective: Palliative thoracic radiotherapy is a key treatment option for symptom management in advanced lung cancer. Continuous symptom monitoring is critical to ensuring optimal therapeutic outcomes and preserving patients' well-being. This systematic review aimed to explore patients' symptom experiences during palliative thoracic radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PsycINFO from database inception through August 31, 2023. Eligible studies included those examining the prevalence and severity of symptoms and side effects experienced by adult patients undergoing palliative thoracic radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer, regardless of treatment duration or dosage. Methodological quality was assessed using the standardized QualSyst tool, and data were synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen symptoms were reported prior to radiotherapy, with cough being the most common (62%). Symptom severity ranged from mild to severe, with dyspnoea recording the highest average score. Distress was not measured during this phase. Post-radiotherapy, fatigue was the most prevalent symptom (69%), followed by cough (64%) and dyspnoea (50%). Symptom severity varied across studies, with improvements noted in cough, dyspnoea, chest pain, and haemoptysis. Moderating factors influencing symptom prevalence and variation included performance status, weight loss, cancer stage, objective tumour response, and radiation-induced pulmonary changes. Conclusions: Symptom control through palliative thoracic radiotherapy demonstrates variability in both frequency and severity of symptoms. Systematic monitoring is essential for identifying persistent symptoms and determining the need for more targeted supportive care interventions.

Pneumocystis pneumonia in stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma with immune-related acute kidney injury and thoracic radiotherapy: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are therapeutic agents for advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high clinical antitumor efficacy. However, immune-related adverse events occur in 20% of these patients and often requiring treatment with immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids. Consequently, this may increase the risk of patients to opportunistic infections. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), a rare but serious opportunistic infection typically observed in patients with human immunodeficiency virus, can also occur in cancer patients undergoing long-term glucocorticoid treatment. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of a 56-year-old male with squamous NSCLC treated with triplimab combined with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radical thoracic radiation therapy. Following this regimen, he developed acute kidney injury (AKI) with elevated creatinine levels. After concurrent radical chemoradiotherapy ended, he developed a grade 3 immune-related AKI. High-dose corticosteroids were administered to treat AKI, and renal function gradually recovered. Corticosteroids were reduced to a dose of 10 mg prednisone equivalent daily eight weeks later; however, he developed severe pneumonia with spontaneous pneumothorax. Next-generation sequencing of the bronchoscopic lavage revealed PJP co-infection with herpes simplex virus 1 and cytomegalovirus. The inflammation was more severe in areas exposed to radiation. Piperacillin-tazobactam, acyclovir, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim were used to control the infection. The patient recovered, and immunotherapy was terminated. CONCLUSION: PJP is rare but can occur in patients with ICI adverse events and should be differentiated from tumor progression or immune-related adverse events. Thoracic radiation may increase risk, necessitating careful monitoring and prevention.

Overview of cardiac toxicity from radiation therapy.

Radiotherapy is an essential part of treatment for many patients with thoracic cancers. However, proximity of the heart to tumour targets can lead to cardiac side effects, with studies demonstrating link between cardiac radiation dose and adverse outcomes. Although reducing cardiac dose can reduce associated risks, most cardiac constraint recommendations in clinical use are generally based on dose to the whole heart, as dose assessment at cardiac substructure levels on individual patients has been limited historically. Furthermore, estimation of an individual's cardiac risk is complex and multifactorial, which includes radiation dose alongside baseline risk factors, and the impact of systemic therapies. This review gives an overview of the epidemiological impact of cancer and cardiac disease, risk factors contributing to radiation-related cardiotoxicity, the evidence for cardiac side effects and future directions in cardiotoxicity research. A better understanding of the interactions between risk factors, balancing treatment benefit versus toxicity and the ongoing management of cardiac risk is essential for optimal clinical care. The emerging field of cardio-oncology is thus a multidisciplinary collaborative effort to enable better understanding of cardiac risks and outcomes for better-informed patient management decisions.

Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy in the Era of Modern Cancer Care for NSCLC.

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher radiation doses administered over longer periods have shown modest survival benefits. These findings stem from studies conducted before the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in clinical practice. Currently, there are no large prospective studies specifically dedicated to palliative radiotherapy conducted in this new treatment era. Modern radiotherapy technologies are now widely available and are increasingly used for palliative purposes in selected patients, reflecting the expanded array of therapeutic options for disseminated NSCLC and improved prognosis. Some traditional tenets of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, such as the improvement of overall survival with a protracted radiation schedule and the use of simple, cost-effective radiation techniques for palliative purposes, may no longer hold true for patients receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The application of IMRT or SBRT in the context of palliative radiotherapy for NSCLC is not yet sufficiently explored, and this is addressed in this review. Moreover, new risks associated with combining palliative radiotherapy with these systemic treatments are being explored and are discussed within the context of palliative care. The optimal timing, doses, fractionation schedules, and treatment volumes for radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy are currently subjects of investigation. In emergencies, radiotherapy should be used as a life-saving measure without delay. However, for other indications of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, decisions regarding doses, timing relative to systemic treatments, and treatment volumes should be made in a multidisciplinary context, considering the patient's prognosis, anticipated outcomes, and access to potentially effective treatments. We still lack robust data from prospective studies on this matter. This review examines and discusses available evidence on the use of palliative thoracic radiotherapy within the framework of modern treatment strategies for NSCLC.

Effect of FDG PET-CT for Staging and Radiotherapy Planning - A Comparison of Cohorts From Two Randomized Trials of Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited-Stage SCLC.

Introduction: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is recommended for staging and defining target volume in limited-stage SCLC, though the impact on outcomes compared with CT staging and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) is not well documented. We analyzed patients receiving 45 Gy/30 fractions in two randomized trials of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited-stage SCLC (HAST and THORA trials) to evaluate whether PET-CT for staging and radiotherapy planning reduces radiotoxicity and improves survival. Methods: Patients in HAST were staged with CT of the thorax and upper abdomen and brain magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Patients in THORA were staged with PET-CT in addition. All patients were to receive four courses of platinum/etoposide chemotherapy and concurrent TRT starting three to four weeks after the first chemotherapy course. In HAST, target volumes included pathological lesions on CT plus ENI of lymph node stations 4-7 (bilateral). In THORA, target volumes were limited to PET-CT-positive lesions (selective nodal irradiation [SNI]). Results: A total of 149 patients were included (PET-CT/SNI: n = 76, CT/ENI: n=73); the median age was 64 years, 56% were women, 85% had PS 0 to 1, and 81% had stage III disease. The PET-CT/SNI group experienced less grade 3-4 esophagitis (18% versus 33%, p = 0.043), less grade >=1 pneumonitis (5% versus 16%, p = 0.028), and less dysphagia after TRT (mean scores on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 13-item lung cancer module: 45 versus 72). There was no difference in median overall survival (24 versus 25 mo, p = 0.59) or progression-free survival (11 versus 11 mo, p = 0.23). Conclusions: Using PET-CT for staging and target volume definition of TRT reduces acute radiotoxicity but does not improve overall or progression-free survival in limited-stage SCLC.

Impact of thoracic radiotherapy on first-line treatment outcomes in ES-SCLC patients.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic advantage of thoracic radiotherapy (tRT) as an adjunct to first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains unclear. We sought to elucidate this in a retrospective cohort study comparing the effectiveness and safety of tRT in combination with first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy. METHODS: Our retrospective study included patients with ES-SCLC, treated at the West China Hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. They received first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy and were categorized into two cohorts based on the administration of tRT. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify potential independent predictors of prognosis and to compare the treatment outcomes across various patient subgroups. Treatment-related toxicities across both cohorts were compared using the Chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 99patients were eligible for the study, out of which 55 received tRT. The medianduration of follow-up was 39 months. Remarkably, patients who received tRTdemonstrated superior OS and PFS in comparison to those who did not (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis further confirmed these findings. Multivariate analysisidentified treatment group and liver metastasis as independent prognosticfactors (P < 0.05). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events showed nostatistically significant difference between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, weconfirmed that the addition of tRT to the conventional regimen of first-linechemotherapy and immunotherapy yields better survival outcomes without asignificant increase in toxicity.

The incidence of and risk factors for radiation pneumonitis in patients treated with simultaneous bevacizumab and thoracic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: First-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab is one of the standard treatment modes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) can provide significant local control and survival benefits to patients during the treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, the safety of adding TRT has always been controversial, especially because of the occurrence of radiation pneumonia (RP) during bevacizumab treatment. Therefore, in this study, we used an expanded sample size to evaluate the incidence of RP when using bevacizumab in combination with TRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using an institutional query system, all medical records of patients with NSCLC who received TRT during first-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab from 2017 to 2020 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were reviewed. RP was diagnosed via computed tomography and was classified according to the RTOG toxicity scoring system. The risk factors for RP were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Ultimately, 119 patients were included. Thirty-eight (31.9%) patients developed Grade ≥ 2 RP, of whom 27 (68.1%) had Grade 2 RP and 11 (9.2%) had Grade 3 RP. No patients developed Grade 4 or 5 RP. The median time for RP occurrence was 2.7 months (range 1.2-5.4 months). In univariate analysis, male, age, KPS score, V20 > 16.9%, V5 > 33.6%, PTV (planning target volume)-dose > 57.2 Gy, and PTV-volume > 183.85 cm3 were correlated with the occurrence of RP. In multivariate analysis, male, V20 > 16.9%, and PTV-volume > 183.85 cm3 were identified as independent predictors of RP occurrence. The mPFS of all patients was 14.27 (95% CI, 13.1-16.1) months. The one-year and two-year PFS rates were 64.9% and 20.1%, respectively. The mOS of all patients was 37.09 (95% CI, 33.8-42.0) months. The one-year survival rate of all patients was 95%, and the two-year survival rate was 71.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Grade ≥ 2 RP in NSCLC patients who received both bevacizumab and TRT was 31.9%. Restricting factors such as V20 and PTV will help reduce the risk of RP in these patients. For patients who receive both bevacizumab and TRT, caution should be exercised when increasing TRT, and treatment strategies should be optimized to reduce the incidence of RP.

Neutrophil­to­lymphocyte ratio reflects lung injury in thoracic radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy with different sequences.

The combination of thoracic radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a novel treatment approach for malignant tumors. However, it is important to consider the potential exacerbation of lung injury associated with this treatment modality. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory marker, holds promise as a non-invasive indicator for assessing the toxicity of this combination therapy. To investigate this further, a study involving 80 patients who underwent thoracic radiotherapy in conjunction with ICIs was conducted. These patients were divided into two groups: The concurrent therapy group and the sequential therapy group. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to ascertain risk factors for grade ≥2 pneumonitis. Following propensity score matching, the NLR values were examined between the concurrent group and the sequential group to evaluate any disparity. A mouse model of radiation pneumonitis was established, and ICIs were administered at varying time points. The morphological evaluation of lung injury was conducted using H&E staining, while the NLR values of peripheral blood were detected through flow cytometry. Logistic regression analysis revealed that radiation dosimetric parameters (mean lung dose, total dose and V20), the inflammatory index NLR at the onset of pneumonitis, and treatment sequences (concurrent or sequential) were identified as independent predictors of grade ≥2 treatment-related pneumonitis. The results of the morphological evaluation indicated that the severity of lung tissue injury was greater in cases where programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade was administered during thoracic radiotherapy, compared with cases where PD-1 blockade was administered 14 days after radiotherapy. Moreover, the present study demonstrated that the non-invasive indicator known as the NLR has the potential to accurately reflect the aforementioned injury.

Radiation pneumonitis after concurrent aumolertinib and thoracic radiotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The superior efficacy of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has been proven in locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, the high incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) reduced by concurrent TRT and TKIs has attracted widespread attention. Thus, this study was designed to investigate the rate and risk factors for RP in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients simultaneously treated with aumolertinib and TRT. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated stage IIIA-IVB NSCLC patients treated with concurrent aumolertinib and TRT between May 2020 and December 2022 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong, China. RP was diagnosed by two senior radiologists and then graded from 1 to 5 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. All risk factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 RP was 42.9%. Grade 2 and 3 RP were observed in 28.6% and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 to 5 RP were not observed. the gross total volume (GTV) ≥ 21 ml and ipsilateral lung V20 ≥ 25% were risk factors for RP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line therapy group and second-line therapy group were 23.5 months and 17.2 months, respectively (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Better local control is achieved with concurrent TRT and aumolertinib, and special attention should be given to controlling ipsilateral lung V20 and GTV to reduce the risk of RP.

A retrospective analysis of optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy for driver gene-negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in driver-gene-negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients was retrospectively investigated based on survival and safety profile. METHODS: The efficacy and safety data of driver-gene-negative mNSCLC patients treated with TRT during maintenance after first-line therapy was collected. Patients whose primary tumor and metastatic lesions remained no progression during maintenance and then received TRT were categorized as the NP (no progression) group, while patients who experienced slow progression during maintenance without reaching progressive disease and then received TRT were categorized as the SP (slow progression) group. The efficacy and adverse events of TRT were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 149 driver-gene-negative mNSCLC patients treated with TRT during maintenance were enrolled into the study, with 119 in the NP group and 30 in the SP group. After a median follow-up of 30.83 (range: 26.62-35.04) months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) in the NP group was 11.13 versus 9.53 months in the SP group (HR 0.599, p = 0.017). The median overall survival (OS) in the NP group was 32.27 versus 25.57 months in the SP group (HR 0.637, p = 0.088). The median PFS after radiotherapy (rPFS) was 6.33 versus 3.90 months (HR 0.288, p < 0.001). The adverse events were tolerable and manageable in both groups without significant difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of TRT during the pre-emptive no progression phase was associated with a significantly longer PFS than during the delayed slow progression phase and had an acceptable safety profile. Our results might support the earlier initiation of TRT after induction therapy for some patients with driver-gene-negative mNSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT). METHODS: Patients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: Addition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.

Treatment-related pneumonitis after thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) following thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD­1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with advanced ESCC who were treated with thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD­1 mAbs. Among them, 56 patients received concurrent radiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs and 41 patients received sequential radiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs. The median prescribed planning target volume (PTV) dose was 59.4 Gy (range from 50.4 to 66 Gy, 1.8-2.2 Gy/fraction). Clinical characteristics, the percentage of lung volume receiving more than 5-50 Gy in increments of 5 Gy (V5-V50, respectively) and the mean lung dose (MLD) were analyzed as potential risk factors for TRP. RESULTS: 46.4% (45/97), 20.6% (20/97), 20.6% (20/97), 4.1% (4/97), and 1.0% (1/97) of the patients developed any grade of TRP, grade 1 TRP, grade 2 TRP, grade 3 TRP, and fatal (grade 5) TRP, respectively. Anti-PD­1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy, V5, V10, V15, V25, V30, V35, V40 and MLD were associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Concurrent therapy (P = 0.010, OR = 3.990) and V5 (P = 0.001, OR = 1.126) were independent risk factors for grade 2 or higher TRP. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal V5 threshold for predicting grade 2 or higher TRP was 55.7%. CONCLUSION: The combination of thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs displayed a tolerable pulmonary safety profile. Although the incidence of TRP was high, grade 1-2 TRP accounted for the majority. Anti-PD­1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy and the lung V5 were significantly associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Therefore, it seems safer to control V5 below 55% in clinical, especially for the high-risk populations receiving concurrent therapy.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 inhibitor versus anti-PD-L1 inhibitor in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 has revolutionized the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, clinical trials suggest differential efficacy of anti-PD-1 agents and anti-PD-L1 agents in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 agents versus anti-PD-L1 agents in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC in real-world practice. METHODS: Patients with pathologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC treated with platinum plus etoposide combined with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 agents as first-line treatment in different centers of PLA General Hospital between January 2017 and October 2021 were included for this study. Survival outcomes and safety were compared between patients receiving anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 agents. RESULTS: Of the total 154 included patients, 68 received anti-PD-1 agents plus chemotherapy (PD-1 group), and 86 received anti-PD-L1 agents plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 group). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort were 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5-8.2 months) and 17.4 months (95% CI: 15.3-19.3 months), respectively. Median PFS and OS were comparable between the PD-1 group and PD-L1 group (PFS: 7.6 months vs. 8.3 months, HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.79-1.62, p = 0.415; OS: 26.9 months vs. 25.6 months, HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.63-1.47, p = 0.859. The objective response rate and disease control rate were comparable between the two groups: 79.4% vs. 79.1% and 92.6% vs. 94.2%, respectively. The 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month PFS and OS rates were slightly higher in the PD-L1 group than in the PD-1 group, while the 24-month PFS rate was slightly higher in the PD-1 group than in the PD-L1 group. Stratified analysis showed that locoregional thoracic radiotherapy and normal lactate dehydrogenase level were independent predictors of better OS in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus ICI. Adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 agents and anti-PD-L1 agents combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC are comparably effective and well tolerated.

Chemoimmunotherapy combined with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoimmunotherapy combined with consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (cTRT) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. The study was registered in PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42023410344). RESULTS: A total of 4677 studies were initially screened and 15 studies encompassing a total of 1033 patients were included. Chemoimmunotherapy combined with cTRT significantly improved survival (HR = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.39, 0.68) with favorable 6-month (0.89, 95 % CI: 0.77, 1.00) and 1-year (0.77, 95 % CI: 0.72, 0.82) OS, without affecting ≥3 grade TRAEs (RR = 1.29, 95 % CI: 0.85, 1.98). Pooled 6-month and 1-year PFS were 0.67 (95 % CI: 0.47, 0.86) and 0.38 (95 % CI: 0.22, 0.55), respectively. Incidence of ≥3 grade TRAEs was 0.24 (95 % CI: 0.08, 0.39) and radiation pneumonitis was 0.03 (95 % CI: 0.01, 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Chemoimmunotherapy combined with cTRT improves survival and shows favorable outcomes in ES-SCLC patients, with manageable adverse events. Further research with larger samples is needed to confirm these findings.

Intrathoracic Progression Is Still the Most Dominant Failure Pattern after First-Line Chemo-immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Thoracic Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the failure patterns before and after the introduction of immunotherapy and to determine the role of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 294 patients with ES-SCLC, of which 62.2% underwent chemotherapy alone, 13.3% underwent chemotherapy followed by consolidative TRT (TRT group), and 24.5% underwent chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI group). We performed propensity-score matching (PSM) to compare each treatment group. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 10.4 months. At the first relapse, in the cohort showing objective response, the proportion of cases showing intrathoracic progression was significantly lower in the TRT group (37.8%) than in the chemotherapy-alone (77.2%, p < 0.001) and the ICI (60.3%, p=0.03) groups. Furthermore, in the subgroup analysis, TRT showed benefits related to intrathoracic progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison with ICI in patients with less than two involved extrathoracic sites (p=0.008) or without liver metastasis (p=0.02) or pleural metastasis (p=0.005) at diagnosis. After PSM, the TRT group showed significantly better intrathoracic PFS than both chemotherapy-alone and ICI groups (p < 0.001 and p=0.04, respectively), but showed no significant benefit in terms of PFS and overall survival in comparison with the ICI group (p=0.17 and p=0.31, respectively). CONCLUSION: In ES-SCLC, intrathoracic progression was the most dominant failure pattern after immunotherapy. In the era of chemoimmunotherapy, consolidative TRT can still be considered a useful treatment strategy for locoregional control.

First-site-metastasis pattern in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without immune check-point inhibition: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate a first-site-metastasis pattern (FSMP) in unresectable stage III NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). METHODS: We defined three patient subgroups according to the year of initial multimodal treatment: A (2011-2014), B (2015-2017) and C (2018-2020). Different treatment-related parameters were analyzed. Observed outcome parameters were brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free survival (ecDMFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: 136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with ≥ 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001). Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016). For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV ≥ 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 ≥ 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027). After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS. CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients revealed that age over 65, V20 ≥ 30 and GTV ≥ 78 cc were prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS. ICI treatment led to a significant improvement of BMFS, ecDMFS and DMFS. ecDM as FSMP was associated with significant deterioration of OS, whereas BM as FSMP was not.

Safety and efficacy of thoracic radiotherapy combined with chemo-immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Background: Immunotherapy has greatly increased the survival time of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and is now a standard first-line treatment for these patients. Increasing evidence suggests a possible synergistic effect between immunotherapy and radiotherapy, yet there is a paucity of evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with chemo-immunotherapy for ES-SCLC. Methods: The medical records of 78 consecutive patients with ES-SCLC who received TRT in combination with chemo-immunotherapy at Jinling Hospital and Jiangsu Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The median overall survival (mOS) time and median progression-free survival (mPFS) time were used to evaluate efficacy, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was used to evaluate safety. Results: The median follow-up time was 31.9 months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 59%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 89.8%. The mOS time was 20.0 months, and the 6-month OS rate was 95%. The mPFS time was 9.2 months, and the 6-month PFS rate was 78%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The incidence of pneumonitis was 23.1%, the incidence of radiation esophagitis was 5.1%, and 2 patients experienced high-grade pneumonitis. Primary liver metastasis was a predictor of poor OS and PFS. Patients who received consolidative TRT after chemo-immunotherapy experienced more benefit than those who received TRT as palliative or salvage treatment for superior vena cava syndrome or disease progression. Conclusions: TRT is a feasible treatment for patients who receive chemo-immunotherapy for the management of ES-SCLC in consideration of its considerable efficacy and tolerable safety risk. This treatment is especially useful for patients without primary liver metastasis and who receive consolidative TRT after chemo-immunotherapy. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality.

Reflecting on the cardiac toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a widely used treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the combination with traditional radiotherapy (RT) has shown significant potential in prolonging patient survival. However, both thoracic RT and ICIs can lead to cardiac toxicity, including radiation-induced heart damage (RIHD) and immunotherapy-related heart damage (IRHD). It still remains uncertain whether the combination of thoracic RT and immunotherapy will exacerbate acute or late cardiovascular (CV) toxicity and incidence. In this review, we summarize safety data from relevant clinical studies regarding CV toxicity for the combination therapy in NSCLC patients, explore the underlying synergetic mechanisms and common risk factors, and proposed treatment and management strategies. We hope to increase emphasis on the long-term assessment of CV toxicity risks associated with the combination therapy, and reduce the incidence of CV deaths resulting from such regimens.

Assessment of short-term effects of thoracic radiotherapy on the cardiovascular parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems.

Background: Prior research suggests that cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction might be an early marker of cardiotoxicity induced by antitumor treatment and act as an early predictor of cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality. The impact of thoracic radiotherapy on the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems, however, remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of thoracic radiotherapy on the autonomic nervous system, using deceleration capacity (DC), acceleration capacity (AC) of heart rate, and heart rate variability (HRV) as assessment tools. Methods: A 5 min electrocardiogram was collected from 58 thoracic cancer patients before and after thoracic radiotherapy for DC, AC, and HRV analysis. HRV parameters employed included the standard deviation of the normal-normal interval (SDNN), root mean square of successive interval differences (RMSSD), low frequency power (LF), high frequency power (HF), total power (TP), and the LF to HF ratio. Some patients also received systemic therapies alongside radiotherapy; thus, patients were subdivided into a radiotherapy-only group (28 cases) and a combined radiotherapy and systemic therapies group (30 cases) for additional subgroup analysis. Results: Thoracic radiotherapy resulted in a significant reduction in DC (8.5 [5.0, 14.2] vs. 5.3 [3.5, 9.4], p = 0.002) and HRV parameters SDNN (9.9 [7.03, 16.0] vs. 8.2 [6.0, 12.4], p = 0.003), RMSSD (9.9 [6.9, 17.5] vs. 7.7 [4.8, 14.3], p = 0.009), LF (29 [10, 135] vs. 24 [15, 50], p = 0.005), HF (35 [12, 101] vs. 16 [9, 46], p = 0.002), TP (74 [41, 273] vs. 50 [33, 118], p < 0.001), and a significant increase in AC (-8.2 [-14.8, -4.9] vs. -5.8 [-10.1, -3.3], p = 0.003) and mean heart rate (79.8 ± 12.6 vs. 83.9 ± 13.6, p = 0.010). Subgroup analysis indicated similar trends in mean heart rate, DC, AC, and HRV parameters (SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF, TP) in both the radiotherapy group and the combined treatment group post-radiotherapy. No statistically significant difference was noted in the changes observed in DC, AC, and HRV between the two groups pre- and post-radiotherapy. Conclusion: Thoracic radiotherapy may induce cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction by reducing parasympathetic activity and enhancing sympathetic activity. Importantly, the study found that the concurrent use of systemic therapies did not significantly amplify or contribute to the alterations in autonomic function in the short-term following thoracic radiotherapy. DC, AC and HRV are promising and feasible biomarkers for evaluating autonomic dysfunction caused by thoracic radiotherapy.

The role of thoracic consolidative radiotherapy in the setting of immunotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

The improvement in treatment strategies and outcomes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has lagged behind other cancers. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), durvalumab and atezolizumab, to the platinum-based chemotherapy in frontline setting has improved the survival in extensive stage SCLC, (ES-SCLC), albeit modestly, and is now the new standard of care. Prior to advent of immunotherapy into the therapeutic armamentarium in ES-SCLC, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) was associated with improved thoracic control and survival outcomes. In the era of ICIs, the role of TRT is not well defined, chiefly because TRT was not incorporated in any immunotherapy trials, secondly due to concerns regarding the increased risks of pneumonitis, and finally uncertain magnitude of benefit with this combined approach. In principle, radiation can increase in the immunogenicity of tumor and hence the activity of immune checkpoint blockade, thereby increasing efficacy both locally and distantly. Such an approach has been promising in non-small cell lung cancer with ICIs improving outcomes after concurrent chemoradiation, but remains unanswered in ES-SCLC. It is, thus, possible that the modest improvement in survival by addition of ICIs to chemotherapy in ES-SCLC can be further improved by the incorporation of consolidative TRT in selected patients. Several early phase trials and retrospective studies have suggested that such an approach may be feasible and safe. Prospective trials are ongoing to answer whether adding radiation therapy to chemoimmunotherapy will improve outcomes in ES-SCLC.