Quantitative and Standardized Pseudovirus Neutralization Assay for COVID-19.

COVID-19 is a global pandemic caused by the highly infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus. Efforts to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection include mass vaccination and development of monoclonal and convalescent plasma therapeutics that require precise measurements of correlative, functional neutralizing antibodies that prevent virus infection. Developing rapid, safe, easy-to-use, and high-quality neutralization assays are essential for the success of the massive effort. Here, we developed a vesicular stomatitis virus-based neutralization assay that was capable of quantifying varying degrees of neutralization in patient serum samples. This assay has two detection readouts, flow cytometry and live cell imaging. The two readout methods produced consistent values of all 50% neutralization titers, further enhancing measurement confidence on the assay. Moreover, the use of available reference standards such as the World Health Organization International Standard (NIBSC code 20/136) enables quantification and standardization of the pseudovirus neutralization assay with neutralizing antibody titers measured in International Units/mL. Quantitative and standardized neutralization assays are critical for reliable efficacy evaluation and comparison of numerous vaccines and therapeutics.

Monoclonal Antibodies as SARS-CoV-2 Serology Standards: Experimental Validation and Broader Implications for Correlates of Protection.

COVID-19 has highlighted challenges in the measurement quality and comparability of serological binding and neutralization assays. Due to many different assay formats and reagents, these measurements are known to be highly variable with large uncertainties. The development of the WHO international standard (WHO IS) and other pool standards have facilitated assay comparability through normalization to a common material but does not provide assay harmonization nor uncertainty quantification. In this paper, we present the results from an interlaboratory study that led to the development of (1) a novel hierarchy of data analyses based on the thermodynamics of antibody binding and (2) a modeling framework that quantifies the probability of neutralization potential for a given binding measurement. Importantly, we introduced a precise, mathematical definition of harmonization that separates the sources of quantitative uncertainties, some of which can be corrected to enable, for the first time, assay comparability. Both the theory and experimental data confirmed that mAbs and WHO IS performed identically as a primary standard for establishing traceability and bridging across different assay platforms. The metrological anchoring of complex serological binding and neuralization assays and fast turn-around production of an mAb reference control can enable the unprecedented comparability and traceability of serological binding assay results for new variants of SARS-CoV-2 and immune responses to other viruses.

Comparison of four commercial EBV DNA quantitative tests to a new test at an early stage of development.

BACKGROUND: Regular screening for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA using quantitative RT-PCR is recommended for early intervention in at-risk patients. Harmonization of quantitative RT-PCR assays is critical to avoid misinterpretation of results. Here, we compare quantitative results of the cobas® EBV assay to four commercial RT-qPCR assays. METHODS: The cobas EBV, EBV R-Gene, artus EBV RG PCR, RealStar EBV PCR kit 2.0 and Abbott EBV RealTime assays were compared for analytic performance using a 10-fold dilution series of EBV reference material, normalized to the WHO standard. For clinical performance, their quantitative results were compared using anonymized, leftover EBV-DNA-positive EDTA plasma samples. RESULTS: For analytic accuracy, the cobas EBV deviated -0.0097 log10 from target values. The other tests showed deviations between 0.0037 and -0.12 log10. For clinical performance, accuracy and linearity of cobas EBV data from both study sites were excellent. Bland-Altman bias and Deming regression analyses showed statistical correlation for cobas EBV to both EBV R-Gene and Abbott RealTime assays but an offset of cobas EBV to artus EBV RG PCR and RealStar EBV PCR kit 2.0. CONCLUSION: The cobas EBV showed the closest correlation to the reference material, followed closely by EBV R-Gene and Abbott EBV RealTime. Values obtained are stated in IU/mL, facilitating comparison across testing sites and potentially improving utilization of guidelines for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of patients.

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody quantitative titer reporting using the World Health Organization International Standard Units by four commercial assays.

The accurate measurement of serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is needed to correlate responses with effective protective immunity. The World Health Organization (WHO) has created an international standard to allow harmonization of immune response assessment to an arbitrary unit across different commercial assays; however, the accuracy of reporting of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers in international standard units (BAU or IU/mL) from commercial assays is not well studied. Here, we report the performance comparison of four quantitative commercial assays testing for SARS-CoV-2 spike immunoglobins using the WHO's international standard. Sera, EDTA-plasma and heparinized plasma collected from individuals who are vaccine naïve or received BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-AstraZeneca) were tested using Abbott Architect AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II, DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG, Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S and GenScript cPass SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization assays. The sensitivities ranged from 90% to 100%, and specificities from 88% to 100%. These four assays had excellent agreement (0.79-0.93) and correlation (0.87-0.97); however, Passing-Bablok regression analysis indicated that data generated by these assays were not comparable. Our data suggests that natural SARS-CoV-2 infection elicited a greater antibody response compared to vaccines, evident by a significantly higher neutralizing antibody titer in unvaccinated individuals who seroconverted.

Virus reduction neutralization test and LI-COR microneutralization assay bridging and WHO international standard calibration studies for respiratory syncytial virus.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine is an unmet medical need. The virus reduction neutralization test (VRNT) was developed to replace the LI-COR microneutralization assay to measure RSV neutralization titers. Methods: A bridging study using selected V171 phase I samples and calibration studies using the WHO international standard antiserum to RSV were performed to compare VRNT and LI-COR. Results: From the bridging study, we showed good concordance between VRNT and LI-COR titers, and similar post-/prevaccination titer ratios. From the calibration studies, we can convert VRNT and LI-COR titers into similar IU/ml. Conclusion: The VRNT and LI-COR microneutralization assay correlate well and the titers can be standardized as similar IU/ml, enabling direct comparison of titers from different assays.

Clinical associations of SARS-CoV-2 viral load using the first WHO International Standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

SARS-CoV-2 viral load declines from the time of symptom onset; in some studies viral load is higher or persists longer in more severe COVID-19 infection, and viral load correlates with culture positivity. This was a retrospective cohort study of inpatients and outpatients during the first wave of COVID-19 infection in Western Australia, March to May 2020, of the relationship of SARS-CoV-2 viral load (using the First WHO International Standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA) from symptom onset, by clinical subgroups determined from the public health database and hospital records, using regression analysis. We studied 320 samples from 201 COVID-19 cases: 181 mild, seven severe, 11 critical, and four cases who died (two were also critical cases). At symptom onset the mean viral load was 4.34 log10 IU/mL (3.92-4.77 log10 IU/mL 95% CI, cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay ORF1a Ct 28.9 cycles). The mean viral load change was -0.09 log10 IU/mL/day (-0.12 to -0.06 95% CI). R2 was 0.08 and residual standard deviation 2.68 log10 IU/mL. Viral load at symptom onset was higher for those reporting fever compared to those not reporting fever. Viral load kinetics were not different for gender, age, shortness of breath, or those requiring oxygen. Mean viral load at usual release from isolation at 14 days was 2.5 log10 IU/mL or day 20 was 1.8 log10 IU/mL. Variability in respiratory sample SARS-CoV-2 viral load kinetics suggests viral loads will only have a role supporting clinical decision making, and an uncertain role for prognostication.

An international collaborative study to assign value for Total Factor XIII-B Subunit Antigen to the WHO 1st International Standard for Factor XIII Plasma, (02/206): Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Factor XIII and Fibrinogen.

BACKGROUND: Factor XIII (FXIII)-B subunit measurements are required for the diagnosis and characterization of the type of FXIII deficiency. Furthermore, therapy for FXIII-A deficiency with recombinant FXIII (rFXIII-A) relies on available FXIII-B. OBJECTIVE: To carry out a collaborative study to calibrate and assign value to the current WHO 1st International Standard (IS) FXIII Plasma for Total FXIII-B subunit, relative to locally collected normal plasma pools. METHODS: Laboratories were instructed to use a validated method (specific ELISA antibodies provided) for assessment of Total FXIII-B subunit antigen potency. All laboratories used this method with one laboratory using an additional in-house method. Nine data sets were received from seven laboratories (37 assays in total), which provided a total of 35 valid estimates for this new assignment. Total FXIII-B subunit estimates were calculated relative to locally collected normal plasma pools, using an arbitrary value of 1.00 unit of Total FXIII-B subunit per ml, for each pool. RESULTS: Combination of results produced an overall mean of 0.98 units/mL with an inter-laboratory variability (geometric coefficients of variation - GCV%) of 18.3% [95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.11]. Real-time and bench stability studies indicated good stability and preservation of the FXIII-B subunit analyte in the WHO 1st IS FXIII Plasma (02/206). CONCLUSION: Following agreement by study participants, ISTH/SSC Experts, WHO-ISTH Liaison Group and the SSC Board, the WHO/ECBS established the current WHO 1st IS Factor XIII plasma (NIBSC code 02/206) by additionally assigning it with a Total FXIII-B subunit antigen value of 0.98 IU/ampoule, in October 2019.

Analysis of Serological Biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Convalescent Samples From Severe, Moderate and Mild COVID-19 Cases.

Precision monitoring of antibody responses during the COVID-19 pandemic is increasingly important during large scale vaccine rollout and rise in prevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC). Equally important is defining Correlates of Protection (CoP) for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease. Data from epidemiological studies and vaccine trials identified virus neutralising antibodies (Nab) and SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific (notably RBD and S) binding antibodies as candidate CoP. In this study, we used the World Health Organisation (WHO) international standard to benchmark neutralising antibody responses and a large panel of binding antibody assays to compare convalescent sera obtained from: a) COVID-19 patients; b) SARS-CoV-2 seropositive healthcare workers (HCW) and c) seronegative HCW. The ultimate aim of this study is to identify biomarkers of humoral immunity that could be used to differentiate severe from mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Some of these biomarkers could be used to define CoP in further serological studies using samples from vaccination breakthrough and/or re-infection cases. Whenever suitable, the antibody levels of the samples studied were expressed in International Units (IU) for virus neutralisation assays or in Binding Antibody Units (BAU) for ELISA tests. In this work we used commercial and non-commercial antibody binding assays; a lateral flow test for detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG/IgM; a high throughput multiplexed particle flow cytometry assay for SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S), Nucleocapsid (N) and Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) proteins); a multiplex antigen semi-automated immuno-blotting assay measuring IgM, IgA and IgG; a pseudotyped microneutralisation test (pMN) and an electroporation-dependent neutralisation assay (EDNA). Our results indicate that overall, severe COVID-19 patients showed statistically significantly higher levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralising antibodies (average 1029 IU/ml) than those observed in seropositive HCW with mild or asymptomatic infections (379 IU/ml) and that clinical severity scoring, based on WHO guidelines was tightly correlated with neutralisation and RBD/S antibodies. In addition, there was a positive correlation between severity, N-antibody assays and intracellular virus neutralisation.

A Highly Sensitive and Specific SARS-CoV-2 Spike- and Nucleoprotein-Based Fluorescent Multiplex Immunoassay (FMIA) to Measure IgG, IgA, and IgM Class Antibodies.

Validation and standardization of accurate serological assays are crucial for the surveillance of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and population immunity. We describe the analytical and clinical performance of an in-house fluorescent multiplex immunoassay (FMIA) for simultaneous quantification of antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleoprotein and spike glycoprotein. Furthermore, we calibrated IgG-FMIA against World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard and compared FMIA results to an in-house enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and a microneutralization test (MNT). We also compared the MNT results of two laboratories. IgG-FMIA displayed 100% specificity and sensitivity for samples collected 13 to 150 days post-onset of symptoms (DPO). For IgA- and IgM-FMIA, 100% specificity and sensitivity were obtained for a shorter time window (13 to 36 and 13 to 28 DPO for IgA- and IgM-FMIA, respectively). FMIA and EIA results displayed moderate to strong correlation, but FMIA was overall more specific and sensitive. IgG-FMIA identified 100% of samples with neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Anti-spike IgG concentrations correlated strongly (ρ = 0.77 to 0.84, P < 2.2 × 10-16) with NAb titers, and the two laboratories' NAb titers displayed a very strong correlation (ρ = 0.95, P < 2.2 × 10-16). Our results indicate good correlation and concordance of antibody concentrations measured with different types of in-house SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. Calibration against the WHO international standard did not, however, improve the comparability of FMIA and EIA results. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 serological assays with excellent clinical performance are essential for reliable estimation of the persistence of immunity after infection or vaccination. In this paper we present a thoroughly validated SARS-CoV-2 serological assay with excellent clinical performance and good comparability to neutralizing antibody titers. Neutralization tests are still considered the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 serological assays, but our assay can identify samples with neutralizing antibodies with 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity without the need for laborious and slow biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) facility-requiring analyses.

The WHO International Standard for COVID-19 serological tests: towards harmonization of anti-spike assays.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays are relevant in managing the COVID-19 pandemic, providing valuable data on the immunization status of the population. However, current serology tests are highly variable, due to their different characteristics and to the lack of reference materials. The aim of the World Health Organization (WHO) first International Standard (IS) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin is to harmonize humoral immune response assessment after natural infection or vaccination, and recommend reporting the results for binding activity in Binding Antibody Units (BAU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed six commercial quantitative anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-protein assays in a head-to-head comparison, using the manufacturers' conversion factors for the WHO IS to obtain BAU/mL values. RESULTS: Our data showed good alignment up to 1000 BAU/mL, then began to disperse, exhibiting some discrepancies. Moreover, correlations among methods varied with Cohen's Kappa ranging from 0.580 to 1.00, with the lowest agreement values for kits using different target antigens or different antibody isotypes, making it clear that the laboratory report should include this information. Values expressed as BAU/ml showed a reduced between-assays variability compared to AU/ml (median coefficients of variation 0.38 and 0.68, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these data at present anti-SARS CoV-2 serological assays' results are not interchangeable, and, more importantly, individual immune monitoring should be performed with the same method.

Samples spiked with pituitary-derived thyroid-stimulating hormone may disguise the extent of differences between thyroid-stimulating hormone assays.

BACKGROUND: A large discordance in the diagnosis and potential management of hypothyroidism using Abbott and Roche thyroid assays has been reported recently. The difference in Abbott and Roche thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) results in these studies was larger than anticipated from the external quality assessment (EQA) reports. METHODS: Abbott and Roche TSH method means in UK NEQAS for thyroid hormones distributions 430 to 454 were compared against the amount of TSH spiked. A TSH deplete serum pool was spiked with various concentrations of pooled high TSH serum and 3rd WHO International Standard for TSH (WHO-IS). Four serum pools with TSH close to clinical decision limits were spiked with two concentrations of WHO-IS. RESULTS: On review of EQA data, median (IQR) Roche: Abbott TSH ratio was lower (p < 0.001) in 48 pools spiked with TSH (1.11 (1.07-1.16)) compared to 41 pools not spiked (1.29 (1.25-1.31)) and the decrease was proportionate to the contribution of spiked TSH to total TSH in the samples (ρ=-0.908, p < 0.001). In spiking experiments, the relationship of Roche and Abbott TSH was different in TSH deplete pool spiked with WHO-IS (RocheTSH=1.13*AbbottTSH-0.52) and high TSH serum (RocheTSH=1.43*AbbottTSH-0.50), respectively. The Roche: Abbott TSH ratio decreased and the method agreement improved on spiking serum pools with WHO-IS. CONCLUSION: Abbott and Roche TSH assays are not in harmony in human serum samples but the agreement was better in samples spiked with WHO-IS which contains pituitary-derived TSH. Use of pituitary-derived TSH spiked samples, such as provided by EQA schemes, may mask clinically significant between-assay differences.

Reliable quantification of plasma HDV RNA is of paramount importance for treatment monitoring: A European multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Quantification of plasma hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA is the essential tool for patient management under antiviral therapy. The aim of this European multicenter study was to improve the comparability of quantitative results reported by different laboratories using the CE/IVD-labeled RoboGene HDV RNA Quantification Kit 2.0 (Roboscreen GmbH) with different manual or automated nucleic acid extraction protocols/platforms and amplification/detection devices. METHODS: For harmonization of HDV RNA concentrations obtained by different protocols, correction factors (CF) were determined using the 1st WHO International Standard for HDV RNA. The limit of detection (LOD) and accuracy were determined for each protocol by using reference material. Furthermore, clinical samples were analyzed and results compared. RESULTS: The CF ranged from 20 to 1,870 depending on the protocol used. The LOD was found between 4 and 450 IU/ml. When accuracy was tested, external quality control (EQC) samples containing low HDV RNA concentrations were not detected by those protocols with higher LODs. For EQC samples, the maximum standard deviation of HDV RNA concentrations was found to be 0.53 log10 IU/ml, for clinical samples 0.87 log10 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: To ensure reliability in quantification of HDV RNA, any modification of the extraction and amplification/detection protocol validated by the manufacturer requires revalidation. With the 1st WHO International Standard for HDV RNA, the CF could easily be calculated leading to harmonization of quantitative results. This warrants both accurate monitoring of response to existing anti-HDV treatment and comparability of study results investigating novel anti-HDV drugs.

Calibration of the WHO 5th IS for Blood Coagulation Factor IX, Concentrate and Ph. Eur. Human Coagulation Factor IX Concentrate Biological Reference Preparation Batch 3 and investigation of the suitability of an IS as potency standard for purified full-length recombinant FIX.

A joint World Health Organization (WHO) - European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) study was run to calibrate the WHO 5th International Standard (IS) for Blood Coagulation Factor IX (FIX), Concentrate, and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Human Coagulation Factor IX concentrate Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) Batch 3. The suitability of the 4th IS as a potency standard for purified full-length recombinant FIX (rFIX) was also investigated. Forty-nine laboratories contributed data for the calibration of 2 plasma-derived FIX candidates, relative to the 4th IS, from clotting and chromogenic assays. The intra-laboratory variability was reasonably low; the inter-laboratory variation was lower for sample B (14/148) than for sample C (14/162). Although there were no discrepancies between clotting and chromogenic assays, a significantly lower potency was obtained for sample C with clotting assays when buffer rather than FIX-deficient plasma was used as pre-diluent. A significant assay discrepancy was observed with estimates for the 4th IS for Blood Coagulation Factors FII, VII, IX, X, Plasma against the 4th IS, resulting in a clotting to chromogenic activity ratio of 1.11. The study also investigated the comparability of the plasma-derived concentrate standard with the rFIX products and considered the establishment of an IS for rFIX. The 3 rFIX products currently licensed were represented in this study. Data from 49 laboratories for 2 rFIX candidates were received, with additional results for another full-length rFIX test sample returned by 6 laboratories. The intra-laboratory variability when the rFIX samples were assayed against the 4th IS was acceptably low. Although the full-length rFIX could be assayed against the plasma-derived 4th IS and provided statistically valid results, there were large discrepancies among the clotting assays using different APTT reagents. The inter-laboratory variability of the chromogenic assays was similarly high. There were also significant clotting and chromogenic assay discrepancies. The data from the present study indicate that a recombinant standard for rFIX products will minimise assay discrepancies and improve inter-laboratory agreement. However, they also underline that the value assignment of the 1st rFIX IS needs careful consideration. The Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) of WHO was therefore not requested to consider the establishment of an IS for rFIX. In order to ensure continued harmonised standards, sample B (14/148) was established as the WHO 5th IS for Blood Coagulation Factor IX, Concentrate, and as Ph. Eur. Human Coagulation Factor IX, concentrate BRP Batch 3 with the functional activity of 10.5 IU/ampoule.

Cost minimization analysis of an in-house molecular test for cytomegalovirus in relation to a commercial molecular system

ABSTRACT Introduction: Cytomegalovirus may cause severe disease in immunocompromised patients. Nowadays, quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the gold-standard for both diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection. Most of these assays use cytomegalovirus automated molecular kits which are expensive and therefore not an option for small laboratories, particularly in the developing world. Objective: This study aimed to optimize and validate an in-house cytomegalovirus quantitative polymerase chain reaction test calibrated using the World Health Organization Standards, and to perform a cost-minimization analysis, in comparison to a commercial cytomegalovirus quantitative polymerase chain reaction test. Study design: The methodology consisted of determining: optimization, analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, precision, curve variability analysis, and inter-laboratorial reproducibility. Patients (n = 30) with known results for cytomegalovirus tested with m2000 RealTime System (Abbott Laboratories, BR) were tested with the in-house assay, as well as patients infected with other human herpes virus, in addition to BK virus. A cost-minimization analysis was performed, from a perspective of the laboratory, assuming diagnostic equivalence of the methodologies applied in the study. Results: The in-house assay had a limit of detection and quantification of 60.3 IU/mL, with no cross-reactivity with the other viral agents tested. Moreover, the test was precise and had a R 2 of 0.954 when compared with the m2000 equipment. The cost analysis showed that the assay was economically advantageous costing a median value of 37.8% and 82.2% in comparison to the molecular test in use at the hospital and the m2000 equipment, respectively. Conclusions: These results demonstrated that in-house quantitative polymerase chain reaction testing is an attractive alternative in comparison to automated molecular platforms, being considerably less expensive and as efficacious as the commercial methods.

Cost minimization analysis of an in-house molecular test for cytomegalovirus in relation to a commercial molecular system.

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus may cause severe disease in immunocompromised patients. Nowadays, quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the gold-standard for both diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection. Most of these assays use cytomegalovirus automated molecular kits which are expensive and therefore not an option for small laboratories, particularly in the developing world. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to optimize and validate an in-house cytomegalovirus quantitative polymerase chain reaction test calibrated using the World Health Organization Standards, and to perform a cost-minimization analysis, in comparison to a commercial cytomegalovirus quantitative polymerase chain reaction test. STUDY DESIGN: The methodology consisted of determining: optimization, analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, precision, curve variability analysis, and inter-laboratorial reproducibility. Patients (n=30) with known results for cytomegalovirus tested with m2000 RealTime System (Abbott Laboratories, BR) were tested with the in-house assay, as well as patients infected with other human herpes virus, in addition to BK virus. A cost-minimization analysis was performed, from a perspective of the laboratory, assuming diagnostic equivalence of the methodologies applied in the study. RESULTS: The in-house assay had a limit of detection and quantification of 60.3IU/mL, with no cross-reactivity with the other viral agents tested. Moreover, the test was precise and had a R2 of 0.954 when compared with the m2000 equipment. The cost analysis showed that the assay was economically advantageous costing a median value of 37.8% and 82.2% in comparison to the molecular test in use at the hospital and the m2000 equipment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that in-house quantitative polymerase chain reaction testing is an attractive alternative in comparison to automated molecular platforms, being considerably less expensive and as efficacious as the commercial methods.

Collaborative study for the establishment of the 3rd international standard for erythromycin.

An international collaborative study was organised to establish the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Erythromycin. Fifteen laboratories from different countries participated. Potencies of the candidate material were estimated by microbiological assays with sensitive micro-organisms. To ensure continuity between consecutive batches, the 2nd IS for Erythromycin was used as a reference. Based on the results of the study, the 3rd IS for Erythromycin was adopted at the meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2018 with an assigned potency of 925 International Units (IU) per mg. The 3rd IS for Erythromycin is available from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM).

Collaborative study for the establishment of the 3rd international standard for amphotericin B.

An international collaborative study was organised to establish the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for amphotericin B. Sixteen laboratories from different countries participated. Potencies of the candidate material were estimated by microbiological assays with sensitive micro-organisms. To ensure continuity between consecutive batches, the 2nd IS for amphotericin B was used as a reference. Based on the results of the study, the 3rd IS for amphotericin B was adopted at the meeting of the WHO Expert Committee for Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2019 with an assigned potency of 953 International Units (IU) per mg. The 3rd IS for amphotericin B is available from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM).

Continued provision of WHO International Standards for total and free PSA: Content and commutability of replacement preparations.

OBJECTIVES: Replacements are required for the WHO International Standards (IS) for free PSA, coded 96/668 and total PSA (90:10), coded 96/670, which were established in 1999 to support efforts to harmonise PSA assays and address non-equimolarity. An important consideration is that the introduction of the replacements should have minimal impact on PSA measurements. DESIGN AND METHODS: We report the development of a replacement strategy, informed by field assessment of preparations through an external quality assessment scheme and the subsequent evaluation of the candidate ISs in worldwide collaborative studies. RESULTS: By immunoassay, data from participants confirmed the value assigned to the current standards. Robust geometric mean estimates of the free PSA content of the candidate replacement for 96/668 coded 17/102 was 0.533 µg/ampoule (n = 21). The ratio of the content estimates of 17/102:96/668 was 0.516 (GCV 12.5%, n = 21). Robust geometric mean estimates of the total PSA content of the candidate replacement for 96/670, coded 17/100, was 0.505 µg/ampoule (n = 22). The ratio of the content estimates of 17/100:96/670 was 0.490 (GCV 5.3%, n = 22). Through concomitant measurement of a panel of 15 representative patient samples, the candidate ISs were shown to exhibit commutability with patient samples that was comparable with that of the current ISs. CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, the preparations coded 17/102 and 17/100 were established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization as the 2nd ISs for free and total PSA (PSA-ACT+free PSA) respectively, with assigned contents of 0.53 µg/ampoule and 0.50 µg/ampoule.

Preparation, calibration and evaluation of the First International Standard for human C-peptide.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of C-peptide by immunoassay contributes to the diagnosis of a number of disorders related to ß cell function. Stocks of the current international reference reagent (IRR) for C-peptide, used to calibrate these immunoassays, are exhausted, and this report summarises the international study to establish a replacement World Health Organization (WHO) international standard (IS) to maintain the availability of a globally available reference material and support efforts to standardise C-peptide assays. METHODS: The study was conducted in three phases; phase I involved the assignment of a value to a primary calibrant in mass units by amino acid analysis and phase II applied this value to the calibration of a candidate standard, 13/146, by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) assay. In phase III, the candidate standard was compared to the first IRR by current immunoassays to assess its suitability to serve as an IS. RESULTS: Calibration of the candidate standard by RP-HPLC gave a final estimated content of 8.64 µg/ampoule with expanded uncertainty of 8.21-9.07 µg/ampoule (95% confidence; k=2.45). The candidate standard also appears sufficiently stable to serve as an IS, based on HPLC analysis of accelerated thermal degradation samples of 13/146, and was also shown to have appropriate immunological activity. A difference in bias approach was used to assess the commutability of 13/146 with human serum and urine samples. With the exception of two laboratories, the candidate standard demonstrated commutability with respect to the serum and urine samples included in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The candidate standard, 13/146, is suitable to serve as the First International Standard for human C-peptide, and it has been formally adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation of the WHO.

Sequencing of the Hepatitis D Virus RNA WHO International Standard.

BACKGROUND: Well-characterized, stable calibration materials are essential to standardize quantitative viral reporting. The preferred calibration materials are the WHO International Standards and secondary standards derived from them. In 2013, the 1st WHO International Standard for Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) RNA became available. During the course of assay development in our laboratory, differences between the published sequence (GenBank ID: HQ005371) and sequence we generated from the WHO HDV Standard were identified. OBJECTIVES: We sought to sequence the entire genome of the WHO HDV Standard and compare the results to the published sequence. STUDY DESIGN: RNA extracted from the WHO HDV Standard was used to generate five overlapping PCR products, including one covering the entire HDV genome, which were Sanger sequenced using standard dye-terminator chemistry. Total RNA from the WHO HDV Standard was also converted to a cDNA library generating 2.1 million sequencing reads on a NextSeq500 instrument. RESULTS: Sanger sequencing produced 32 overlapping, partial sequences of the HDV genome. RNA-seq resulted in 8100 HDV sequences covering the viral genome an average of 645-fold. Sanger and RNA-seq consensus sequences had 100% agreement and showed 89.0% nucleotide identity with the published WHO HDV Standard sequence. BLAST analysis revealed HQ005369 as the closest match with 99.2% nucleotide identity. CONCLUSIONS: HQ005369 was deposited in GenBank along with HQ005371 and seven others from a study of nine Turkish patients. A sample mix-up or clerical error may have resulted in the incorrect association of identifier and sequence. The correct nucleic acid sequence for standards is critical for test accuracy, optimization, calibration, and troubleshooting.