Surgical explantation of the WATCHMAN device and right atrial thrombus: a case report.

A 74-year-old male with a history of cardioembolic stroke, chronic atrial fibrillation, and cerebral hemorrhage, who had undergone left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device 1 year prior, was diagnosed with a 25-mm intra-cardiac mass in the right atrium. The patient underwent the surgical removal of the right atrial mass and the explantation of the WATCHMAN device. The WATCHMAN device was explanted with an external incision at the base of the left atrial appendage, facilitating the removal of the device and the closure of the appendage through direct suturing. The pathological examination confirmed the right atrial mass to be a thrombus. The patient was discharged on postoperative Day 13. From the perspectives of simplicity and radicality, the external approach could be a good option.

Tissue oedema following pulsed field ablation recognized during a concomitant left atrial appendage closure procedure: a case report.

Background: In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), at high stroke risk, and who are ineligible for long-term oral anticoagulation, the left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) could be an alternative to anticoagulation. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new non-thermal method for cardiac ablation modality based on high-voltage electrical energy for irreversible electroporation. We first report a case of a concomitant PFA pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and LAAC. Case summary: A 74-year-old female patient was referred to our department for PVI for persistent AF (CHA2DS2-VASc score 5). A concomitant percutaneous LAAC was proposed because of a history of previous cerebellar transient ischaemic attack despite continuous oral anticoagulation therapy. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved with a pentaspline PFA catheter, and LAAC was performed with a WATCHMAN FLX™ device (Boston Scientific, Plymouth, MN, USA). After PVI, a swelling of the left atrial ridge was observed, yet a 27 mm LAAC device was successfully implanted. The follow-up transesophageal echo (TEE) after 6 weeks showed complete resolution of the oedema, no device-related thrombus, but a slight proximal tilting of the LAAC device without leakage could be observed. The 6-month follow-up demonstrated a stable sinus rhythm, no stroke, or bleeding events were recorded. Discussion: In this case of synchronous PFA-PVI procedure in AF and WATCHMAN FLX™ device implantation, the electroporation created an acute oedema at the ridge level which at the TEE follow-up after 6 weeks was resolved. This resulted in a slightly tilted WATCHMAN device position which was nevertheless stable and showed no leakage.

Reproducibility of Cardiac Computed Tomography Classifications of Hypoattenuated Thickening and Peridevice Leak Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

AIMS: To assess the reproducibility of interpreting hypoattenuated thickening (HAT) and peridevice leak (PDL) using cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging following Watchman FLX left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter retrospective reproducibility study, 100 anonymized post-LAAC cardiac CT scans were evaluated within the same cardiac phase by an experienced and a novice rater blinded to prior evaluations. All scans were evaluated twice by each rater, assessing overall HAT and PDL categories as well as specific associated findings based on suggested algorithms for post-LAAC interpretation. Inter- and intra-rater agreement and reliability were evaluated using absolute agreement, Cohen's kappa and Kendall's tau for categorical variables, and mean difference, Bland-Altman plots, limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for continuous variables.Within overall categories of both HAT and PDL, substantial agreement (kappa >0.61) and reliability (Kendall's tau-b  > 0.75) were observed. Specifically, identifying high-grade HAT (kappa >0.78) and distal patency (kappa >0.85) displayed the highest agreement within HAT and PDL interpretation. Meanwhile, measuring the height of the proximal screw hub cove represented the least reliable HAT assessment among both inter- and intra-rater comparisons (ICC<0.75), while suspected leak mechanism represented the least reproducible PDL measure. CONCLUSION: Despite only minimal training of one rater, overall high levels of inter- and intra-rater agreement and reliability were observed across the chosen algorithms for interpretation of HAT and PDL following Watchman FLX LAAC. Prognostic implications of the included variables are to be explored in future trials and registries.

Surgical Removal of a Migrated WATCHMAN Device.

The WATCHMAN™ atrial appendage closure device is designed to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are not suitable candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. However, the device also carries small risks, including procedural complications such as device migration, embolization, or pericardial effusion. We describe a case of WATCHMAN device migration requiring surgical retrieval.

Efficacy and safety of the VASCADE® MVP venous vascular closure device in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion with WATCHMAN.

BACKGROUND: The VASCADE MVP venous vascular closure system is commonly used for percutaneous venotomy closure in catheter-based procedures utilizing sheath sizes 6-12 French. However, its application with larger sheaths such as ones required in left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has yet to be explored. AIMS: This study compared the efficacy and safety of VASCADE MVP versus conventional Figure-of-8 sutures (Fo8) for femoral venotomy closure in patients undergoing Watchman LAAO. METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis included patients who underwent post-LAAO femoral venotomy closure with either VASCADE MVP or Fo8 sutures. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to hemostasis (TTH). Primary safety endpoints were 30-day access site-related readmissions and major complications. Minor access-site-related complications were also assessed. RESULTS: 107 patients underwent post-LAAO femoral venotomy closure with VASCADE MVP, of which 101 were successful (94.4%). 99 patients underwent conventional closure with Fo8 sutures and supplemental manual pressure. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. TTH was significantly shorter with VASCADE MVP (152.9 vs. 335.8 s, p = 0.001). Major safety outcomes were comparable. However, the conventional group experienced a higher incidence of ecchymosis (16.2% vs 4.7%, p = 0.007) and 30-day all-cause readmission (18.2% vs 8.4%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: VASCADE MVP significantly reduced TTH compared to Fo8 sutures after LAAO. While demonstrating a similar safety profile, VASCADE MVP may offer a more efficient approach to femoral vein closure in this patient population.

Gender differences in outcomes after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman FLX device: insights from the Italian-FLX registry.

Introduction: Recent studies have shown gender differences in cardiovascular outcomes after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), highlighting different complication rates and adverse events, particularly in short-term assessments. As a result, there remains a significant knowledge gap on how these differences directly impact the efficacy and safety of LAAC procedures. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of LAAC in women and men using the Watchman FLX device. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzes gender-specific outcomes in 650 patients who underwent LAAC with the Watchman FLX device between March 2019 and May 2022, drawn from the ITALIAN-FLX registry. Results: The results show comparable rates of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack and major bleeding in men and women 12 months after the procedure. Notably, no significant gender differences were found for periprocedural complications. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study shows that LAAC with the Watchman FLX device has comparable clinical outcomes between genders at both short-term and long-term follow-up.

Left Circumflex Fistula After Watchman Implantation: A Case Report of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Complication.

Left atrial appendage closure devices reduce the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation while avoiding the risks associated with therapeutic anticoagulation. This significant value comes with additional unique risks associated with device implantation or surgical closure. We discuss an uncommon complication of Watchman device (Boston Scientific) implantation wherein an asymptomatic fistulous connection developed between the left atrial appendage and the left circumflex artery. Additionally, we review other documented cases of left atrial appendage fistulas and current management approaches for iatrogenic fistulous connections associated with procedural left atrial appendage closure.

Embolized Watchman Removal With Modified Hangman Technique.

In this case report, we explore a novel technique to remove an embolized Watchman device (Boston Scientific) into the thoracic aorta endovascularly. The technique involves a wire + snare combination that is threaded through the metal struts of the Watchman. This combination technique along with the threading provides increased stability during removal and decreases the risk of the Watchman slipping from the devices and causing further embolization. Further work is required to elucidate the efficacy of this technique in other scenarios.

Watchman vs. Amulet for Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a crucial intervention for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are unsuitable for long-term anticoagulation. Amulet and Watchman are the most implanted devices worldwide for performing LAAC, and the aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive comparison focusing on their efficacy, safety, and short- and long-term outcomes. The Watchman device, the first to gain FDA approval, has been extensively studied and demonstrates significant reductions in stroke and systemic embolism rates. The Amulet device, a newer alternative, promises enhanced design features for more efficient appendage sealing. Current data highlight that both devices offer similar efficacy and safety for LAAC. While the two devices differ in terms of intraprocedural complication rates, they offer similar short- to long-term outcomes in terms of peri-device leaks, device-related thrombosis, and mortality. Both devices are indicated for patients who are unable to tolerate OAC, given their similar risk and safety profiles. Newer clinical studies are directed at establishing the efficacy of both devices as the primary method for stroke prevention in AF as an alternative to OAC.

Adverse outcomes with left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in chronic and end stage kidney disease: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) are associated with increased risk of bleeding events, including hemorrhagic stroke, and periprocedural and gastrointestinal bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) among this patient population has been uncertain with studies showing contradictory results. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were queried for studies comparing outcomes among patients with and without significant CKD, and with and without ESRD who underwent LAAO device implantation. Data on outcomes from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed using random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test. RESULTS: Data from eleven studies with 61,724 patients with and without kidney disease were included in the final analyses. There was an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.76, 95 % CI [1.15-6.64]; p = 0.02) and peri-procedural bleeding (1.51 [1.33-1.71]; p < 0.01) associated with kidney disease. There was no significant difference in risk of stroke (1.19 [0.70-2.03]; p = 0.53), pericardial effusion (1.22 [0.77-1.92]; p = 0.40), vascular complications (1.18 [0.92-1.52]; p = 0.20), or device related thrombus (1.13 [0.53-2.40]; p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an increased risk of complications among patients with kidney disease, who undergo LAAO device implantation. These findings suggest the need for studies with randomized control design specifically designed to compare outcomes with LAAO versus anticoagulation in the CKD and ESRD populations.

Unforeseen and Immediate: A Case of a Post-Watchman Device-Related Thrombus.

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is recognized as a risk factor linked to arterial thromboembolism stemming from blood clot formation in the left atrium, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Most of these thrombi originate in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy can help mitigate this risk. LAA occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an option for patients who cannot safely tolerate long-term OAC. Watchman is one of the commonly used devices with a favorable safety profile demonstrated in numerous studies. One of the most concerning complications of LAAO is device-related thrombus (DRT), which may form on the atrial side of the device and potentially lead to embolization. We present a rare case of immediate DRT formation following the deployment of a Watchman device in a 78-year-old male with persistent AFib. Despite appropriate periprocedural management, a thrombus was observed immediately post implantation. This case emphasizes the need for vigilant surveillance, prompt diagnosis, and therapeutic intervention to manage such complications. The patient was successfully managed with a heparin drip, leading to thrombus resolution. This report underscores the complexities of managing DRT and the importance of ongoing research to optimize outcomes for patients undergoing LAAO.

"The Failing Watchman": Recurrent Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device (LAAOD) Thrombus After Successful Initial Implantation.

A 79-year-old female with chronic atrial fibrillation was being treated with dabigatran (Pradaxa). Pradaxa was discontinued after a significant bleeding episode. A WATCHMAN device was successfully implanted and Pradaxa was started. A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) 49 days later showed a 3.6×2.2 cm clot overlying the device. Pradaxa was switched to Coumadin. Subsequent TEEs showed the complete resolution of the thrombus after five months on Coumadin. Coumadin was discontinued. Six months later, TEE showed a large mobile thrombus attached to the left atrial appendage occlusion device (LAAOD). The patient's hypercoagulable workup was negative. Due to recurrent thrombotic events, she was started on apixaban (Eliquis) due to a prior history of bleeding on Coumadin. She is currently on Eliquis with no further episodes of bleeding or device thrombus.

Comparative Profiles of the WATCHMAN™ and Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug/Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Devices for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia marked by irregular and frequent tachycardic rhythms in the atria, affecting 1%-2% of the general population. The WATCHMAN™ device from Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) and the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device from Abbott (Chicago, IL, USA) are two devices used globally for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in non-valvular AF. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Elsevier's ScienceDirect literature databases to identify studies comparing the WATCHMAN™ procedure with Amulet™ device implantation for LAAC in patients with AF. The analyses were conducted using the random-effects model. A total of 20 studies were identified, with 18 falling into the category of observational studies and 2 being randomized controlled trials. A total of 6310 participants were included in this meta-analysis, with 3198 individuals (50.68%) assigned to the WATCHMAN™ procedure group and 3112 individuals (49.32%) allocated to the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug (ACP) group. The analysis revealed a higher risk of stroke associated with the WATCHMAN™ technique (relative risk [RR], 1.14), albeit without statistical significance. Conversely, the WATCHMAN™ approach led to a significantly lower risk of cardiac death (RR, 0.44; P = .04). Notably, the risks of all-cause mortality (RR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.08; I 2 = 0%; P = .25) and major bleeding (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.33; I 2 = 31%; P = .70) were clinically reduced with the WATCHMAN™ procedure, although statistical significance was not achieved. Compared to Amulet™ device implantation, WATCHMAN™ device implantation decreased the risk of cardiac mortality, while the risks of stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding were not statistically significant.

Transition from WATCHMAN generation-2.5 device to WATCHMAN FLX device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: Incidence and predictors of device-related thrombosis and short- to mid-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) not suitable for long-term anticoagulant therapy undergo percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using the WATCHMAN device. The safety and efficacy of WATCHMAN-FLX (WM-FLX) compared with WATCHMAN-2.5 (WM-2.5), particularly in Asian populations, is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated the background, procedure, and clinical outcomes of 199 patients who underwent LAAC between September 2019 and December 2022 and compared WM-2.5 (72 patients) with WM-FLX (127 patients). RESULTS: The mean age was 76 years, with 128 men, and 100 had nonparoxysmal AF (non-PAF). The mean CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED were 5.1, and 3.2 points, respectively. WM-FLX group demonstrated a shorter procedure time than WM-2.5 group (50 vs. 42 min, p = 0.001). The WM-FLX group demonstrated no procedural-related acute cardiac tamponade, which was significantly low (5.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.02), and a significantly higher rate of complete seal at 45-day (63% vs. 80%, p = 0.04). WM-FLX group had a significantly higher cumulative 1-year incidence of device-related thrombosis (DRT) than WM-2.5 group (3.4% vs. 7.0%, Log-rank p = 0.01). Univariate analysis identified two DRT risk factors in the WM-FLX group: non-PAF (odds ratio [OR] 7.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-48.7; p = 0.04), and 35-mm device (OR 5.13; 95% CI 1.31-19.8; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: WM-FLX significantly improved the procedural quality and safety of LAAC. However, DRT remains an important issue even in the novel LAAC device, being a hazard for patients with high DRT risk, such as having non-PAF and using 35-mm devices.

Management of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and atrial fibrillation: We are still far from precision medicine.

The use of anticoagulation therapy could prove to be controversial when trying to balance ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding risks in patients with concurrent cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In fact, CAA is an age-related cerebral vasculopathy that predisposes patients to intracerebral hemorrhage. Nevertheless, many AF patients require oral systemic dose-adjusted warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (such as factor Xa inhibitors) or direct thrombin inhibitors to control often associated with cardioembolic stroke risk. The prevalence of both CAA and AF is expected to rise, due to the aging of the population. This clinical dilemma is becoming increasingly common. In patients with coexisting AF and CAA, the risks/benefits profile of anticoagulant therapy must be assessed for each patient individually due to the lack of a clear-cut consensus with regard to its risks in scientific literature. This review aims to provide an overview of the management of patients with concomitant AF and CAA and proposes the implementation of a risk-based decision-making algorithm.

Comparative Data of Procedural and Midterm Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Between the WATCHMAN FLX and WATCHMAN 2.5 Devices　- Insight From the OCEAN-LAAC Registry.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding clinical outcomes after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX (WM-FLX) and WATCHMAN-2.5 (WM2.5) devices in Asian patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of 1,464 consecutive patients (WM-FLX, n=909; WM2.5, n=555) were extracted from a Japanese multicenter registry, and clinical data were compared between the 2 groups. No in-hospital deaths, periprocedural stroke, or device embolization occurred. Procedural success was significantly higher in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group (95.8% vs. 91.9%; P=0.002) owing to the lower incidence of periprocedural pericardial effusion (0.55% vs. 1.8%; P=0.021). No significant differences in all-cause death, postprocedural stroke, and device-related thrombus were observed between the 2 groups. However, the cumulative bleeding rate at 1 year was substantially lower in the WM-FLX group (7.8% vs. 16.4%; P<0.001). Landmark analysis of bleeding events highlighted lower bleeding rates in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group within the first 6 months (6.4% vs. 14.8%; P<0.001), with comparable bleeding rates over the 6- to 12-month period (1.5% vs. 3.2%, respectively; P=0.065). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated higher early safety and lower 1-year bleeding rates in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group. The lower bleeding events with WM-FLX are likely due to multiple factors other than purely difference in devices, such as postprocedural drug regimen.

Incidence and temporal evolution of delayed peridevice leak after left atrial appendage closure.

BACKGROUND: Peridevice leak (PDL) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) portends adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, predictors, clinical implications, and temporal evolution of PDL after LAAC. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included all patients who underwent LAAC with Watchman FLX and had no PDL detected at the time of implantation. The primary end point was the incidence of new PDL at initial imaging. The composite secondary end point included continued oral anticoagulation after initial imaging, device-related thrombus, stroke or transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, and need for PDL closure at longest follow-up. Temporal evolution of PDL was assessed in patients with available surveillance imaging. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients who completed imaging at 47 days (interquartile range [IQR] 44-50 days), 139 (39%) had new PDL with a mean leak size of 3.2 ± 1.4 mm (median 3.0 mm; IQR 2.0-4.0 mm; range 1.0-9.0 mm). Multiple deployment attempts and larger device size were positive predictors of PDL, while increased contrast volume administration was a negative predictor of PDL. The composite secondary end point occurred in 42 (30%) patients with PDL and 33 (15%) patients without PDL (P < .001). Of the 139 patients with PDL, 43 (31%) had surveillance imaging where the leak size regressed from 3.7 ± 1.8 mm at 46 days (IQR 44-51 days) to 1.7 ± 2.0 mm at 189 days (IQR 158-285 days) (P < .001). The leak size regressed in 33 (77%), remained stable in 4 (9%), and progressed in 6 (14%) cases. CONCLUSION: Despite design improvements, LAAC with Watchman FLX demonstrates a significant incidence of PDL with meaningful clinical implications. Regardless of initial size, most leaks regressed over time.