Scoliosis Research Society-22r score is affected by standing whole body sagittal alignment, age, and sex, but not by standing balance or skeletal muscle mass in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: Aging and spinal disease impair standing whole body sagittal alignment (WBS alignment), which leads to stooping. When WBS alignment deteriorates, compensatory mechanisms are activated to maintain standing posture. Increase of the compensation impairs health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this research was to determine whether postural factors, age, and sex affect HRQOL. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the influence of WBS alignment, standing body sway (balance), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), aging, and sex on HRQOL in healthy volunteers (n = 150; mean age 40.9 years [20-76], 96 women). Age, sex, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were obtained. HRQOL was assessed with Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r). WBS alignment and balance were measured by EOS imaging with simultaneous force plate measurement. SMM was measured using a medical body composition analyzer. Based on the bivariate analysis between the SRS-22r subtotal and all parameters, selected ten parameters were used for multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify affecting factors to SRS-22r. RESULTS: Men had significantly higher weight, height, BMI, and SRS-22r score in all domains. The L4-S1 lumbar lordosis angle was greater in men, and pelvic tilt and knee hyperextension were greater in women. Women had a more stable standing posture, whereas men had significantly higher SMM values. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, sex, and TPA were identified as significant factors affecting SRS-22r. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy volunteers, SRS-22r is affected by aging, sex (woman had a lower score), and sagittal malalignment. Neither Standing balance nor SMM, however, affect SRS-22r.4.

Knee Extension Is Related to the Posteriorly Deviated Gravity Line to the Pelvis in Young Adults: Radiographic Analysis Using Low-Dose Biplanar X-ray.

PURPOSE: We sought to compare the radiographic parameters concerning the sagittal alignment of the standing whole-body skeletons between the knee extension group and control group using the low-dose biplanar X-ray system in a young adult population without knee pain, and to investigate the associated variables for the sagittal knee angle (sagKA) among the radiographic parameters of global sagittal alignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed whole-body standing sagittal radiographs of 124 young adults taken from December 2018 to May 2020 in a single institution. We compared the radiographic parameters concerning the lower extremity sagittal alignment and global sagittal alignment between the knee extension group and control group. The factors correlated with sagKA were evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The sagittal vertical axis (SVA), the horizontal offset between the gravity line (GL) and the posterior edge of S1 endplate (GL-S), and the horizontal offset between the GL and the hip center (GL-H) were -11.6±21.3 mm, 5.1±23.8 mm, and -25.1±27.1 mm in the knee extension group, respectively, which were significantly smaller than those in the control group. The C7 plumb line (C7PL) and GL were deviated posterior to the sacrum and the hip center in the knee extension group, with the mean sagKA of -5.6° in young adults. CONCLUSION: The GL-H using GL, not the SVA using C7PL, was a significant radiographic factor associated with the sagKA.

Compensation for standing posture by whole-body sagittal alignment in relation to health-related quality of life.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that three grades of sagittal compensation for standing posture (normal, compensated, and decompensated) correlate with health-related quality of life measurements (HRQOL). METHODS: A total of 50 healthy volunteers (normal), 100 patients with single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS), and 70 patients with adult to elderly spinal deformity (deformity) were enrolled. Following collection of demographic data and HRQOL measured by the Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r), radiological measurement by the biplanar slot-scanning full body stereoradiography (EOS) system was performed simultaneously with force-plate measurements to obtain whole body sagittal alignment parameters. These parameters included the offset between the centre of the acoustic meatus and the gravity line (CAM-GL), saggital vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), McGregor slope, C2-7 lordosis, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and knee flexion. Whole spine MRI examination was also performed. Cluster analysis of the SRS-22r scores in the pooled data was performed to classify the subjects into three groups according to the HRQOL, and alignment parameters were then compared among the three cluster groups. RESULTS: On the basis of cluster analysis of the SRS-22r subscores, the pooled subjects were divided into three HRQOL groups as follows: almost normal (mean 4.24 (SD 0.32)), mildly disabled (mean 3.32 (SD 0.24)), and severely disabled (mean 2.31 (SD 0.35)). Except for CAM-GL, all the alignment parameters differed significantly among the cluster groups. The threshold values of key alignment parameters for severe disability were TPA > 30°, C2-7 lordosis > 13°, PI-LL > 30°, PT > 28°, and knee flexion > 8°. Lumbar spinal stenosis was found to be associated with the symptom severity. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the three grades of sagittal compensation in whole body alignment correlate with HRQOL scores. The compensation grades depend on the clinical diagnosis, whole body sagittal alignment, and lumbar spinal stenosis. The threshold values of key alignment parameters may be an indication for treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1359-1367.

Comparison of whole body sagittal alignment during directed vs natural, relaxed standing postures in young, healthy adults.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Imaging for adult spinal deformity is conventionally performed in a directed manner to assess the most upright standing posture one can assume. However, this method does not reflect an individual's natural, relaxed posture, which is the posture a patient likely reverts to postoperatively, and also the posture likely to explain spinal pathologies. PURPOSE: To identify radiographic differences between directed and natural, relaxed standing postures in young healthy subjects. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, prospective, radiographic study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty healthy 21-year-old subjects (48 male, 12 female). OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2 SVA, C2-7 SVA global cervical angle, T1-slope, global thoracic angle (GTA), thoracolumbar angle (TLA), global lumbar angle (GLA), sacral slope, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence, femoral alignment angle (FAA), and knee alignment angle (KAA). METHODS: The EOS whole body radiographs of patients in directed and natural, relaxed standing postures were obtained, with subsequent comparison of radiographic parameters. Differences in Roussouly curve types, sagittal curve apices, and end vertebrae were also evaluated. Univariate analyses using Wilcoxon sign-rank, paired t tests, and paired chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: Compared with directed standing, natural, relaxed standing results in a more kyphotic spinal profile marked by a significantly less lordotic GLA, larger GTA, TLA, and T1-slope. The PT+FAA demonstrated true hip movement during sagittal balancing. Lower thoracic and lumbar apices, lower thoracolumbar end vertebrae, and lower Roussouly curve types were observed during natural, relaxed standing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found significant differences in sagittal radiographic parameters between directed standing and the natural, relaxed standing posture, with the latter demonstrating a more kyphotic spinal profile in terms of magnitude and span, as well as complementary changes in cervical and spinopelvic alignment. The natural, relaxed standing posture, a marker for energy conservation principles in standing, may infer value in less aggressive lordotic restoration, as well as concentration of lordosis in the lower lumbar spine.

Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the normative values of whole body sagittal alignment and balance of a healthy population in the standing position; and to clarify the relationship among the alignment, balance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and age. METHODS: Healthy Japanese adult volunteers [n = 126, mean age 39.4 years (20-69), M/F = 30/96] with no history of spinal disease were enrolled in a cross-sectional cohort study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire was administered and subjects were scanned from the center of the acoustic meati (CAM) to the feet while standing on a force plate to determine the gravity line (GL), and the distance between CAM and GL (CAM-GL) was measured in the sagittal plane. Standard X-ray parameters were measured from the head to the lower extremities. ODI was compared among age groups stratified by decade. Correlations were investigated by simple linear regression analysis. Ideal lumbar lordosis was investigated using the least squares method. RESULTS: The present study yielded normative values for whole standing sagittal alignment including head and lower extremities in a cohort of 126 healthy adult volunteers, comparable to previous reports and thus a formula for ideal lumbar lordosis was deduced: LL = 32.9 + 0.60 × PI - 0.23 × age. There was a tendency of positive correlation between McGregor slope, thoracic kyphosis, PT, and age. SVA, T1 pelvic angle, sacrofemoral angle, knee flexion angle, and ankle flexion angle, but not CAM-GL, increased with age, suggesting that the spinopelvic alignment changes with age, but standing whole body alignment is compensated for to preserve a horizontal gaze. ODI tended to increase from the 40s in the domain of pain intensity, personal care, traveling, and total score. ODI weakly, but significantly positively correlated with age and PI-LL. CONCLUSION: Whole body standing alignment even in healthy subjects gradually deteriorates with age, but is compensated to preserve a horizontal gaze. HRQOL is also affected by aging and spinopelvic malalignment.