Efficacy of Two-Point Versus Three-Point Fixation for Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) functions as the main buttress for the lateral portion of the middle third of the facial skeleton and because of its prominent position & convex shape, it is frequently fractured, alone or along with other bones of the midface. The management of the ZMC fractures is debatable as the literature is saturated with various theories. A number of techniques, from closed reduction to open reduction and internal fixation can be effectively used to manage these fractures. Controversies lie right from the amount of fixation (mostly 2-, 3-point fixation) required to the ideal approach, and there is no conclusive view on its ideal line of management. Aim: To systematically review the existing scientific literature to determine whether two-point or three-point fixation is a better treatment alternative for the patients with zygomaticomaxillary fractures through a meta-analysis. Methods: Review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases like PubMed, Google scholar and Ebsco Host were searched from January 2000 to November 2023 for studies reporting treatment of zygomaticomaxillary fractures through two-point and three-point fixation and reporting the outcome in terms of mean and standard deviation (SD). Quality assessment of included was evaluated using Cochrane risk of bias (ROB)-2 tool through its domains. The risk of bias summary graph and risk of bias summary applicability concern was plotted using RevMan software version 5.3. The standardized mean difference (SDM) was used as summary statistic measure with random effect model and p value < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: Eleven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis, of which only eight studies were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled estimate through the standardized mean difference (SMD) of - 0.21 (- 0.83-0.41) favors two-point fixation employing random effect model with I2 (heterogeneity) value of 89% and p value 0.51. Publication bias through the funnel plot showed asymmetric distribution with systematic heterogeneity. Conclusion: In our systematic review, we aimed to evaluate which method of fixation is more effective in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Our pooled estimate using quantitative synthesis indicates that both two- and three-point fixation procedures are equally effective in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary fractures. As a result, two-point fixation is as efficient as three-point fixation in treating zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures.

Virtual surgical planning in tripod zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures: A prospective comparison between two different strategies.

Multifragmentary and displaced zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are often a challenge for the maxillofacial surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the improved performance in the management of patients with tripod fracture of the orbito-zygomaticomaxillary complex, using two different methods of virtual surgical planning - virtual reduction and mirroring - compared with traditional management. A cohort of 60 patients was selected and divided into three groups, each consisting of 20 individuals. Patients in the first group were managed using the virtual reduction method, those in the second group using the mirroring method, and those in the third group using a traditional surgical approach. Having achieved virtual fracture reduction, a stereolithographic model was printed, on which preplating of the plates was performed. The results showed that virtual reduction was the most accurate in absolute terms, with a mean discrepancy in juxtaposition of the preoperative and postoperative CT images of 0.175 mm (SD ± 0.147), compared with 0.403 (SD ± 0.166) for the mirror method (and traditional method (0.875, SD ± 0.112; p > 0.0001). The average surgical time for virtual reduction (89.5 min) was faster than for mirroring (94.25 min) and for the traditional approach (96.75 min). In conclusion, the use of virtual surgical planning allows greater intraoperative accuracy, reduced surgical time, and reduced postoperative complications compared with traditional surgery. Of the two methods, virtual reduction performed best for the outcomes decribed.

Microplate Versus Combined Microplate-Miniplate in Fixation of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: An In-Silico Analysis of Biomechanical Parameters.

Introduction: To compare the biomechanical parameters of microplates and the combined miniplate-microplate for fixing zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures using nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA). Material and Methods: Two samples of ZMC fracture models were prepared. In sample 1 (S1), the fractures were stabilized with microplates, and in sample 2 (S2), with miniplates plus microplates. FEA software was used to measure the displacement, Von Mises stress distribution (VMSD), and maximum principal stress distribution (MPSD). Results: The displacement was 6.7 µm in the L-shaped plate of both samples, 4.4 µm in the S1 lateral-edge plate, 4.8 µm in the S2 lateral-edge plate, 5.8 µm in the S1 bottom-edge plate, and 5.6 µm in the S2 bottom-edge plate. The VMSD was 41.1 MPa in the S1 lateral-edge plate, 24.3 MPa in the S2 lateral-edge plate, 7.6 MPa in the S1 Lshaped plate, 9.6 MPa in S2 L-shaped plate, 28.5 MPa in the S1 bottom-edge plate, and 11.8 MPa in the S2 bottom-edge plate. The MPSD was 46.2 MPa in the S1 lateral-edge plate, 26.4 MPa in the S2 lateral-edge plate, 3.6 MPa in S1 L-shaped plate, 4.2 MPa in S2 L-shaped plate, 30.9 MPa in S1 bottom-edge plate, and 14.1 MPa in the S2 bottom-edge plate. Conclusion: The L-shaped and lateral-edge plates in both samples had the highest and lowest amount of displacement, respectively. The lateral-edge plates in both samples had the highest VMSD and MPSD, which was higher in S1 than S2. The L-shaped plate had the lowest VMSD and MPSD in both samples.

Evaluation of Different Patterns of Zygomaticoorbital Complex Fractures.

Study Design: Very few studies exist regarding the fracture pattern variability of the zygomaticoorbital (ZMO) complex. The retrospective evaluation of a large series of surgically treated unilateral ZMO fractures would in certain circumstances help intraoperative predictability and define sensitive indicators for open reduction and internal fixation. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the different fracture patterns after ZMO complex injury regarding the 5 anatomic sutures of the zygoma as well as the concomitance of the paranasal buttress and maxillary sinus wall fracture. Methods: The medical records of all patients with unilateral ZMO fractures who underwent surgical intervention in a single trauma center department between April 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and anamnesis data, radiologic findings, and surgical reports were evaluated. According to the preoperative radiologic evaluation, ZMO fractures were classified as unisutural, bisutural, trisutural, tetrasutural, and complete based on the number of zygomatic sutures. The prevalence of various fracture patterns was analyzed. The impact of patient's age and trauma etiology on the fracture pattern was evaluated using descriptive statistical analysis. Results: The study included 492 patients with unilateral ZMO fractures, with a mean age of 49.93 years (SD = 20.66) and a male:female ratio of 2.23:1. The most affected age group was 19-44 years (41.67%) and tripping falls were the most common etiology (27.24%). Trisutural (57.32%) and unisutural fractures (23.17%) were the most common, followed by tetrasutural (8.94%), bisutural (8.54%), and complete fractures (2.03%). A trisutural fracture involving the zygomaticomaxillary suture, the infraorbital rim, and the zygomaticosphenoidal suture was the most common fracture pattern (52.03%). Most fractures were observed in the zygomaticosphenoidal suture (86.99%), followed by the infraorbital rim (74.59%) and the zygomaticomaxillary suture (68.29%). Fractures of the maxillary sinus wall and the paranasal buttress co-existed in 9.55% and 31.30% of all cases, respectively. No correlation was detected between age and fracture pattern (P = .4111). Tripping falls and bicycle accidents significantly influenced the fracture pattern (P < .0001). Conclusions: According to the results, knowledge of the fracture pattern variability of the ZMO complex could in certain circumstances designate CT or CBCT as mandatory before operating on ZMO fractures. Consequently, unnecessary incisions could be avoided. The high concomitance of paranasal buttress fracture also suggests its intraoperative surgical exploration. Further studies should correlate the clinical findings with indication for surgery and postoperative outcome for the different fracture patterns described.

Effect of tranexamic acid on postoperative blood loss.

The aim of this article was to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce blood loss after maxillofacial fracture surgery. Clinical data were collected retrospectively on patients with unilateral fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) or mandibular condyle. Patients were then further divided into TXA and control groups according to whether or not TXA was used after surgery. The amount of postoperative blood loss was evaluated by negative pressure drainage volume. Data were statistically analysed. In patients with unilateral ZMC fractures, total postoperative blood loss in the TXA group was about 30 ml less than that in the control group (p = 0.006). It was significantly less on the first and second postoperative days. However, in patients with unilateral mandibular condylar fractures, there was no significant difference between the TXA and control groups (p = 0.917). TXA can reduce postoperative bleeding in patients with ZMC fractures, and the optimal usage time is on the first and second postoperative days. For patients with mandibular condylar fractures, TXA may not be used.

Evaluation of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures with Gillies Approach in Al-Baha Region of Saudi Arabia: A Cohort Study.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the degree of fracture reduction after open reduction and internal fixation of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex (ZMC) fractures in the Saudi population of the Al-Baha region, using Gillies approach. Further comparison with preoperative and postoperative standardized computed tomography (CT) views with the calculation of residual deformity percentage, which remained after the ZMC rehabilitation. Methods: A 5-year retrospective CT-based study on preoperative and postoperative axial CT scans of 46 male patients with ZMC fractures. The CT measurements were made (in millimeters) at the fracture site of maximum displacement through the anterior orbital rim and orbital floor, posterolateral wall of the maxillary sinus, zygomatic arch, and zygomaticofrontal suture. For the zygomatic arch, measurements were made (in mm) by drawing a tangent to the fractured arch segments and dropping a perpendicular to the inward displaced fractured arch. The total difference in all measured parts between preoperative and postoperative displacement was calculated in percentages. Results: Upon comparison of preoperative and postoperative zygomaticomaxillary complex CTs, three-point fixation at the regions of infraorbital rim, frontozygomatic suture, and posterolateral wall of the maxilla results in a reduction of the fracture sites in the range of 72.85% to 85%. Maximum reduction was noted at the zygomatic arch, that is, 85%, and minimum at the infraorbital rim, that is, 72.85%. The reduction obtained at all four sites was statistically significant, with P values ranging from .011 to .039. Conclusion: Gillies temporal approach and three-point fixation at the regions of the infraorbital rim, frontozygomatic suture, and posterolateral wall of the maxilla results in satisfactory treatment of ZMC fractures and improves patients oral health and quality of life.

Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Plating Systems in ZMC Fractures: An Original Research.

Objective: This study's objective was to assess and contrast the performance of several plating techniques in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. Group A (Microplate System), Group B (Titanium Mesh System), and Group C (Absorbable Plate System) plating systems were the ones that were studied. Materials and Methods: With 10 patients in each group, a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with ZMC fractures was done. The following information was gathered: fracture reduction, stable fixation, complications, and patient satisfaction. Analysis was done on patient-reported outcomes, surgical outcomes, and demographic factors. Results: Group B (Titanium Mesh System) came in second with rates of 70% and 80%, respectively, while Group A (Microplate System) showed the highest rates of fracture reduction (90%) and stable fixation (100%). For fracture reduction and stable fixation, Group C (Absorbable Plate System) demonstrated rates of 80% and 90%, respectively. For Groups A, B, and C, the complication rates were 20%, 30%, and 10%, respectively. For Groups A, B, and C, the patient satisfaction levels were 90%, 80%, and 70%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the results, the Microplate System (Group A) is better than the Titanium Mesh System (Group B) and the Absorbable Plate System (Group C) in terms of fracture reduction and stable fixation when treating ZMC fractures. All plating systems had acceptable complication rates, and overall patient satisfaction ratings were high. Fracture features and patient-specific considerations should be taken into account while making individualized treatment options.

Physiotherapy Approach in Bilateral Parasymphysis Fracture With Bilateral Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture: A Case Report.

The mandible occupies the lowest point on the face. When the lower face is struck by high blows with upward or obliquely directed force, the prominent bone of the face sustains severe damage. When combined with zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures, mandibular fractures, which frequently occur in parasymphysis, present a challenging clinical scenario. This combination often requires a collaborative strategy to ensure a proper diagnosis and all-encompassing care. In this case study, we discussed the alleged trauma case of a 30-year-old male who met with a road traffic accident due to a bike slip at around 8:30 p.m. on October 8, 2023, in Pulgaon. He was taken to a rural hospital and referred for further management. An orthopantomogram was done on investigation, and bilateral para-symphysis fracture and bilateral zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture were noticed. Later, the patient underwent surgery, where open reduction and internal fixation of the bilateral parasymphysis and right zygomaticomaxillary buttress fracture and closed reduction of the right zygomatic arch fracture under general anesthesia were made. Intermaxillary fixation was done. Then, he was referred to the physiotherapy department for therapeutic intervention. The rehabilitation goals were to maintain the strength of the afflicted muscles, regain full range of motion, minimize pain and edema, and gradually increase mobility. The patient was put on a four-week regimen. It was found that the patient reacted favorably to the treatment.

Modeling stability post zygomatic fracture reconstruction.

Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture repair is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in craniomaxillofacial trauma management. Miniplates and screws are used to stabilize the fractured bone using small local incisions, however, these procedures are not infrequently associated with hardware-related post-operative complications. The amount of fixation hardware utilized varies depending on the fracture pattern and surgical judgment, with three-point fixation being the conventionally accepted treatment. However, limited experimental testing and clinical studies have suggested that ZMC stabilization may be achieved with less than three-point fixation. In this study, we utilized a previously developed finite element modeling approach that allows for detailed bone and muscle representation to study the mechanical behavior of the fractured craniomaxillofacial skeleton (CMFS) under one, two, or three-point fixation of the ZMC. Results suggest that using a miniplate along the infraorbital rim in three-point fixation increases the amount of strain and load transfer to this region, rather than offloading the bone. Two-point (zygomaticomaxillary and zygomaticofrontal) fixation yielded strain patterns most similar to the intact CMFS. One-point (zygomaticofrontal) fixation resulted in higher tensile and compressive strains in the zygomaticofrontal region and the zygomatic arch, along with a higher tensile strain on the zygomatic body. These modeling results provide biomechanical evidence for the concept of over-engineering in the stabilization of facial fractures. Furthermore, they support previous suggestions that less than three-point fixation of ZMC fractures may be adequate to achieve uneventful healing.

Symmetry recovery in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures compared to normal unfractured population: A new reliable 3D evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to quantify the facial symmetry of surgically treated zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures through a new reliable three-dimensional evaluation method, which is crucial for improving post-operative aesthetic and functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Healthy patients and patients with surgically treated ZMC fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Using Brainlab Elements® the zygomatic bone and the orbit of each patient was segmented and mirrored. Subsequently, the mirrored side was matched with the other side via volume-based registration, using the segmented orbit as reference. Volumetric asymmetry was measured using 3-matic software, and a surface-based matching technique was used to calculate the mean absolute differences (MAD) between the surfaces of the two sides of the ZMC. The reliability of this novel method using volume-based registration was tested, and the intra-class correlation coefficient was assessed. RESULTS: The MAD between the surfaces of the left and right sides in the control group was 0.51 mm (±0.09). As for the ZMC fracture group, MAD was 0.78 mm (±0.20) and 0.72 mm (±0.15) pre- and post-operatively, respectively. The MAD showed statistically significant differences between pre- and post-operative groups (p = 0.005) and between control and post-operative groups (p < 0.001). The intra-class correlation coefficient was high (≥0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation method using mirroring and volume-based registration to determine the symmetrical position of the ZMC is reliable. The surface-based measurements revealed an improved symmetry after surgery. However, the symmetry of the treated patients remained lower than the control group.

Role of finite element analysis for selection of single point fixation in zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture.

BACKGROUND: One-point fixation was superior to the two and three-points fixation in minimally displaced zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture regarding the cost, invasiveness, scaring, number of wounds, and operation time. Accordingly, this study aimed to predict which one-point fixation is the most stable in managing minimally displaced ZMC fracture. MATERIAL & METHODS: This study simulated the different one-point fixation approaches on three ZMC models after fracture reduction and application of all forces exerted on the fractured area. The findings were represented as stress impact on the ZMC fracture and plating system as well as the inter-fragments micro-motion. RESULTS: The von misses stresses of plates for the zygomaticofrontal, infra-orbital rim, and zygomaticomaxillary buttress model were (66.508, 1.285, and1.16 MPa) respectively. While the screws' von misses for the infraorbital rim, zygomaticofrontal, and zygomaticomaxillary buttress models were (13.8, 4.05, and 1.60 MPa) respectively. Whereas, the maximum principles stress at zygomaticofrontal, zygomaticomaxillary buttress, and infraorbital rim models were (37.03, 37.01, and 34.46 MPa) respectively. In addition, the inter-fragment micro-motion for zygomaticomaxillary buttress, infraorbital rim, and zygomaticofrontal models were (0.26, 0.25, and 0.15 mm) respectively. CONCLUSION: One-point fixation at zygomaticomaxillary buttress is the preferred point because it is exposed to low stresses, and the inter-fragment micro-motion is within the approved limit with the elements in the same direction of fixation which indicates the rigid fixation. In addition, it is less palpable and scarless. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinical trial.gov (NCT05819372) at 19/04/2023.

Post-operative Scar Comparison With Supraorbital Eyebrow and Upper Blepharoplasty Approach in the Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures.

Study Design: A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the postsurgical scar with Supraorbital Eyebrow (SE) Approach and Upper Blepharoplasty (UB) Approach used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. Objective: To evaluate and compare the post-operative scar using Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) following ORIF of ZMC fractures with SE and UB approaches. Methods: In this study, 88 patients with ZMC fractures requiring ORIF and meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited between 2019 and 2020. Patients were randomly divided into SE and UB group, 44 patients in each. Clinical and radiological assessment was done preoperatively and post-operative scar evaluation was carried out at different intervals over a period of 6 months using VSS. A blinded observer rated the scar. Results: The results showed that after 6 months of surgery, all the 44 (100%) patients in UB group had a mild scar (VSS score 1-5), while in the SE group 34 (77.3%) patients had a mild scar (VSS score 1-5) and 10 (22.7%) had a moderate scar (VSS score 6-10). The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P-value = .001). Conclusions: The UB approach has been established to be superior to SE approach in terms of post-operative scar as the results were statistically significant. This study can be used to advocate more frequent use of UB approach as compared to the previously popular SE approach for the management of ZMC fractures.

Retrospective Study of Orbital and Orbitozygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures Treated at Aalesund Hospital Between 2002 and 2017.

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objective: To evaluate patient demographics, surgical management, and complications of orbital and orbitozygomaticomaxillary complex (OZMC) fractures treated at a district hospital in Norway. Methods: The medical records of patients with orbital fractures treated at Aalesund hospital between January 2002 and July 2017 were reviewed. Data on demographics, signs and symptoms, cause of injury, fracture type, associated fractures, surgical management, and complications were collected. Results: A total of 36 patients were reviewed. Males predominated (1:4.1), and fractures occurred mostly in patients 40-59 years (mean 41.8 years). Interpersonal violence was the leading cause of injury, followed by falls. Alcohol was significantly associated with assault caused fractures (P = .001). Orbitozygomaticomaxillary fractures were the most frequent, followed by pure orbital fractures. Clinical findings included periorbital ecchymosis (72%), swelling (56%), sensory nerve dysfunction (53%), diplopia (22%), and restricted eye motility (22%). Commotio cerebri was observed in more than half of our sample and 47% had other facial bone fractures. Referral to tertiary hospitals was done in 19% of the cases. The main treatment done was open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (45%). Infection was diagnosed in 17% and managed with antibiotics. Conclusions: The incidence of orbital and OZMC fractures in Moere and Romsdal county in western Norway was low, occurring mainly in males over 40 years. The mechanism of injury was predominantly interpersonal violence and falls. A high proportion of the sample had minor traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Maxillary sinus volume and facial asymmetry after unilateral zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture reduction with 2, 3, and 4 fixation points: CBCT-based investigation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the maxillary sinus volume (MSV), Chronic Sinusitis incidence, and asymmetry of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) following ZMC fracture surgery with various numbers of fixation points. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective non-randomized cohort, 50 adults with unilateral ZMC fractures who treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) between November 2019 and October 2021 were assigned to accomplish this study. They distributed into three groups as per fixation points (2, 3, or 4 Points). Preoperative (T1), Immediate postoperative (T2), and follow-up (T3) cone beam computed topography were analyzed using the Mimics software. The main measures were MSV and asymmetry indexes (ASI) of six paired bilateral anatomical landmarks (Orbital, Suprajugal, Jugale, Zygon, Maxillozygion 1, and Maxillozygion 2). RESULTS: MSV decreased significantly on the affected sides postoperatively in 2P and 3P groups, both in T2 and T3. Further, the T2-T3 comparisons showed a significant MSV change (p = 0.001). ASI reduced considerably to clinically tolerated levels (<3 mm) on landmarks near the fixation sites postoperatively. The ASI on the Zygon and Maxillozygion 1 landmarks showed significant changes among the three groups in both T2 and T3. Interestingly, only five cases had reported postoperative sinusitis symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although the MSV was changed among the different fixation point groups, the incidence of chronic sinusitis was uncommon. Bilateral asymmetry affected by number and position of the fixation points, fixation with 4 points provide more symmetry.

Facial fractures: The "bottom-up" approach.

Given the demands of a busy high-volume trauma center, trauma radiologists are expected to evaluate an enormous number of images covering a multitude of facial bones in a short period of time in severely traumatized patients. Therefore, a comprehensive checklist, search pattern, and practical approach become indispensable for evaluation. Moreover, fracture complex classification conveys abundant information in a succinct shorthand fashion, which can be a large asset in a busy high-volume trauma center: reliably helping clinicians communicate urgent findings, make early treatment decisions, and effectively plan surgical approaches. Traditionally, radiologists' approach the CT axial dataset in top-down fashion: navigating their descent craniocaudal. However, a bottom-up approach may be advantageous, especially when it comes to facial fracture complex classification. Four key anatomic landmarks of the face, when evaluated sequentially in bottom-up fashion, are favorable to rapid single-sweep facial fracture characterization: the mandible, the pterygoid plates, the zygoma, and the bony orbits. That is, when done in succession: 1. Clearing the mandible rules out a panfacial smash fracture. 2. Clearing the pterygoid plates effectively rules out a Le Fort I, II, and III fracture. 3. Clearing the zygoma effectively rules out a zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) type fracture. 4. Clearing the bony orbits effectively rules out a naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fracture. Following this process of exclusion and elimination; as one ascends through the face, fracture characterization becomes more manageable and straightforward. Besides identifying all of the fractures and using the appropriate classification system, the radiologist also needs to recognize key clinically relevant soft tissue injuries that may be associated with facial fractures and thus should address these in the report.

Is three-point fixation needed to mechanically stabilize zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures?

Fixation is critical in zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures to avoid malunion; however, controversy exists as to how much hardware is required to achieve adequate stability. Current fixation regimens may not represent the minimum stabilization needed for uneventful healing. Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) computational models have shown limited load transmission through the infraorbital rim (IOR), and a previous experimental study of ZMC fractures has suggested that IOR plating does not alter CMF bone strain patterns. This study aimed to measure the impact of stabilization on fracture site displacement under muscle loading, testing the hypothesis that three-point fixation is not critical for ZMC fracture stability. Four ZMC complex fractures were simulated on two cadaveric samples and stabilized with three-point plating. Displacements simulating mouth openings of 20 mm and 30 mm were applied to the mandible using a custom apparatus. Fracture gap displacement under load was measured at multiple points along each fracture line, and bone strain was captured using a combination of uniaxial and rosette gauges. Data capture was repeated with the IOR plate removed (two-point fixation) and with the zygomaticomaxillary plate removed (one-point fixation). Fracture displacement under muscle loading was consistent, with gaps of less than 1 mm in 95% of cases (range 0.05-1.44 mm), reflecting clinical stability. Large variabilities were observed in the strain measurements, which may reflect the complexity of CMFS load patterns and the sensitivity of strain values to gauge placement. This study supports the concept of hardware reduction, suggesting that two-point (or even one-point) fixation may provide sufficient stability for a ZMC fracture under applied muscle loading.

Comparison of the biomechanical properties of internal fixation materials for zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures, A finite element analysis.

Regarding the three distinct types of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures, this study developed finite element models (FEMs) of absorbable material and titanium material for repair and fixation, respectively. By applying a force of 120 N to the model to simulate the masseter muscle strength, the maximum stress and displacement of the repair materials and the fracture ends were measured. In discussing various models, the maximum stress values of absorbable and titanium materials are less than their yield strength, and the maximum displacement values of the titanium material and fracture end were less than 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. The maximum displacement values of absorbable material and fracture end in incomplete zygomatic fracture and dislocation were less than 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. While in the zygomatic complex complete fractures and dislocation, the maximum displacement values of the absorbable material and the fracture end exceeded 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. Consequently, the distinction between the maximum displacement values of the two materials was 0.08 mm, and the distinction between the maximum displacement values of the fracture ends was 0.22 mm, despite the fact that the absorbable material can withstand the fracture end's strength, it is not as stable as the titanium material.

Pediatric Le Fort, Zygomatic, and Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Fractures.

Fractures of the pediatric midface are infrequent, particularly in children in the primary dentition, due to the prominence of the upper face relative to the midface and mandible. With downward and forward growth of the face, there is an increasing frequency of midface injuries seen in children in the mixed and adult dentitions. Midface fracture patterns seen in young children are quite variable; those in children at or near skeletal maturity mimic patterns seen in adults. Non-displaced injuries can typically be managed with observation. Displaced fractures require treatment with appropriate reduction and fixation and longitudinal follow-up to evaluate growth.

Incidence of Orbital Side Effects in Zygomaticomaxillary Complex and Isolated Orbital Walls Fractures: A Retrospective Study in South Italy and a Brief Review of the Literature.

Zygomaticomaxillary complex and isolated orbital walls fractures are one of the most common fractures of the midface, often presenting orbital symptoms and complications. Our study was born with the aim of understanding the trend in the incidence of orbital presurgical symptoms, specifically diplopia, enophthalmos and exophthalmos, in the Campania Region in southern Italy. We conducted a retrospective, monocentric observational study at the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of the Federico II University Hospital of Naples, enrolling 402 patients who reported a fracture of the zygomaticomaxillary complex and orbital floor region from 15 June 2021 to 15 June 2022. Patients were evaluated by age, gender, etiology, type of fracture, preoperative orbital side effects and symptoms. Pre-surgical side effects were studied, and 16% of patients (n = 66) developed diplopia. Diplopia was most common in patients previously operated on for orbital wall fractures (100%), and least common in patients who reported trauma after interpersonal violence (15%) and road traffic accidents (11%). Exophthalmos appeared only in 1% (six cases); whereas it did not appear in 99% (396 cases). Enophthalmos was present in 4% (sixteen cases), most commonly in interpersonal violence cases (two cases). The frequency of orbital complications in patients with zygomaticomaxillary complex and isolated orbital walls fractures suggests how diplopia remains the most common pre-surgical orbital side effect.

Characteristics of Orbital Injuries Associated with Maxillofacial Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of ocular injury associated with maxillofacial trauma remains poorly defined, with reported rates ranging from 0.8% to 92%. Our study aims to more accurately characterize ocular injuries associated with midface fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 1677 patients from 2015 to 2020 with midface fractures at a Level I trauma center. Isolated nasal bone and frontal process of the maxilla fractures were excluded. Demographic information, mechanism of injury, need for surgery, and ophthalmologic findings were documented. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. RESULTS: 773 patients between the ages of 15 and 92 were identified. Trauma most commonly resulted from assault (63.8%). The association between the mechanism of injury and ocular injury was statistically significant (p = 0.003), with 78.6% of gunshot wounds and 44.3% of assault patients having an ocular injury. The Ophthalmology service evaluated 62.6% of cases preoperatively. Minor ocular injury occurred in 36% of patients, including 46.1% of isolated orbital floor, and 28.2% of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Major ocular injury occurred in 10.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Over 10% of patients with midface fractures were found to have major ocular injuries. Ophthalmologic exams should be performed for all patients with midface fractures to guide clinical decision making and prevent further intraoperative ocular insults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. This study represents a retrospective cohort study analyzing ocular injuries detected in patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with maxillofacial fractures between 2015 and 2020 Laryngoscope, 133:1624-1629, 2023.