Effectiveness and safety of the modified multiple mode procedures versus traditional multiple mode procedures on treating facial atrophic acne scars: a propensity score matching retrospective cohort study.

Multiple mode procedures (MMP) of fractional CO2 laser provide higher efficacy and shorter downtime in treating acne scars, compared to traditional fractional CO2 laser therapy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of modified MMP integrated with fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR), ultra-pulse CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser in treating acne scars. A retrospective analysis of 162 acne scar patients treated with MMP or modified MMP was conducted. Acne scars were evaluated using the Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acné (ECCA) grading scale, modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS), and Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Baseline variables were balanced with propensity score matching (PSM) to improve the comparability of treatment effectiveness and safety between groups. Among 162 patients with facial acne scars, 68 were treated with modified MMP and 94 with traditional MMP. After PSM, both groups had 55 patients with comparable baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). The ECCA score decreased more significantly in the modified MMP group (60%±11%) than in the MMP group (45%±16.6%, P < 0.001). The modified MMP group also had higher mMSS color score (2.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.005), greater reduction in pore size and skin laxity (P < 0.001), shorter postoperative erythema duration (22.2 ± 4.0 vs. 31.3 ± 3.7 days, P < 0.001), but higher pain scores (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS: 6.7 ± 1.6 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). Modified MMP is more effective than traditional MMP in treating acne scars, especially for patients with large pores and skin laxity.

A Comparative study between the efficacy of combined Intense Pulsed Light plus high-intensity focussed ultrasound in the treatment of atrophic and icepick scars.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficiency of high-intensity focussed ultrasound with intense pulsed light in the treatment of atrophic and icepick acne scars. METHODS: The interventional study was conducted between November 2021 and April 2022 at the Postgraduate Medical Physics Laboratory, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised patients with atrophic scars in group A and acne scars in group B. They were treated first with intense pulsed light and then with high-intensity focussed ultrasound. All patients received 4 treatment sessions spread over 4 weeks. Outcome assessment was done using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Data was analysed using SPSS software version 24. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients, 12(55%) were males with mean age 20.75±4.20 years, and 10(45%) were females with mean age 21±2.05 years. The combination technique showed significant outcomes compared to baseline (p<0.05). Atrophic scars exhibited significantly greater improvement compared to icepick scars (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the overall opinion of the observer (p=0.3549) and the patients (p=0.0956). CONCLUSIONS: The high-intensity focussed ultrasound and intense pulsed light techniques used in combination was found to be effective in treating atrophic and icepick scars.

Microneedling in Dermatology: A Comprehensive Review of Applications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Microneedling, also known as collagen induction therapy, is a minimally invasive dermatological procedure that has gained widespread popularity for treating various skin conditions, including acne scars, wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, and stretch marks. By creating controlled micro-injuries in the skin, microneedling stimulates the body's natural healing processes, resulting in increased collagen and elastin production, essential for maintaining skin elasticity and firmness. Over the past few decades, microneedling has evolved significantly, with advancements such as automated devices, radiofrequency microneedling, and combination therapies enhancing its effectiveness and safety profile. This comprehensive review explores the mechanisms of action, various techniques, and clinical applications of microneedling, highlighting its advantages over other skin rejuvenation methods. The review also examines patient satisfaction, safety considerations, and potential complications, providing a balanced perspective on its clinical utility. Furthermore, the discussion includes future directions in microneedling technology and research, focusing on emerging innovations and potential new applications. As the field advances, microneedling is poised to play an increasingly important role in aesthetic medicine, offering a reliable and effective solution for skin rejuvenation and beyond. This review is a valuable resource for healthcare professionals, guiding the optimization of microneedling practices and informing future research efforts.

The 2910-nm Fiber Laser Is Safe and Effective for Improving Acne Scarring.

BACKGROUND: Acne scarring results from the inflammation associated with acne papules, which alters dermal collagen, typically producing depressed scars. Lasers have been used to remodel skin improving the texture and appearance of acne scars. Herein, we investigate a new 2910 nm, erbium-doped, fluoride glass, fiber laser for improving acne scars. This novel laser delivers up to 5000 Hz low-energy pulses, providing a unique treatment modality. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with rolling and/or boxcar acne scars were enrolled in this study. Thirteen subjects completed the final visit and received three treatments with the 2910 nm fiber laser at 6-8-week intervals. Eight subjects were Fitzpatrick type II and five were Fitzpatrick type III. Digital images were taken pre- and 1- and 3-months posttreatment and evaluated by two blinded reviewers in a randomized fashion for improvement. Subjects and the treating physician completed a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) before treatment and at each visit to subjectively evaluate treatment effect. Histological analysis was performed on ex vivo lower eyelid skin samples. Side effects were evaluated by the treating physician and included erythema, edema, and pinpoint bleeding. RESULTS: Evaluation of blinded digital images revealed a mean improvement of 47.3% ± 14.2% (mean ± SEM) 3 months following the final treatment. GAIS scores demonstrated improvement as evaluated by both the subjects and the treating physician. Side effects averaged trace-to-mild erythema, edema, and pinpoint bleeding. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the 2910 nm, erbium-doped, fluoride glass, fiber laser is safe and effective for improving the appearance of acne scars.

Effectiveness of microneedle fractional radiofrequency combined with transcutaneous delivery of botulinum toxin in the management of post-acne scars.

BACKGROUND: Post-acne scars are a common sequela of acne, especially prevalent among young people. Delayed treatment not only affects self-perception of beauty but also affects the mental health of patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) combined with botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) in managing post-acne scars. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 63 adult patients with post-acne scars, divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 30) and group 2 (n = 33). Group 1 received treatment with MFR combined with transcutaneous delivery of BoNT/A, whereas group 2 received treatment with MFR alone. The study observed the clinical outcomes in both groups. RESULTS: Based on experimental analysis, the combination of MFR with transcutaneous delivery of BoNT/A demonstrated superior clinical efficacy compared with group 2. There were no significant differences in baseline data or treatment-related pain and adverse reactions between the two groups. However, group 1 exhibited a higher effectiveness rate, lower ECCA score after treatment, higher satisfaction levels, and statistically significant differences compared to group 2. CONCLUSION: MFR combined with transcutaneous delivery of BoNT/A represents an effective and safe alternative for treating acne scars with minimal side effects and complications. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Post-acne scars are a common sequela of acne and combination therapy proves beneficial. Microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) combined with transcutaneous delivery of BoNT/A can be considered an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of acne scars with minimal side effects and complications. It works together through microneedles, radiofrequency, and botulinum toxin. MFR combined with transcutaneous delivery of BoNT/A is based on the direct action of MFR on acne scars and the use of microneedle to create a transient skin microchannel, facilitating BoNT/A penetration into the skin.

Clinical aspects and risks of the phenol/croton oil.

Phenol/croton oil is a unique chemical formulation promoting deep skin resurfacing and cellular renovation. Even though it has been used for decades in plastic surgery, the clinicopathological features, as well as the risks related to phenol/croton oil clinical application have not been thoroughly studied. The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of the phenol/croton oil peel, the pathological characteristics from 1 patient at least and the emerging potential risks. A total of 64 patients were treated with phenol/croton oil peel between 2014 and 2023; in total, 21 of them underwent resurfacing at their oral area (upper/lower lips), 15 underwent resurfacing at their lower eyelid wrinkles, 22 patients underwent full face resurfacing, 2 patients were treated for their acne scars and additionally 4 patients were treated for multiple body seborrheic keratosis. The wrinkles, as well as the acne scars were markedly improved in all patients, the seborrheic keratosis was eliminated, while adverse events and undesired clinical manifestations related to peel intervention were mild and reversible for all patients. The application of phenol/croton oil constitutes an immensely powerful tool for deep chemical peeling and facial skin rejuvenation; nevertheless, it should be used cautiously due to its potential complications.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of microneedling and its combination with other treatments in patients with acne scars: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of microneedling (MN), both alone and in combination with other treatments, to refine the approach for treating acne scars using MN. We systematically searched Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials examining MN or its combinations in patients with acne scars. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 18 software. A total of 24 studies involving 1546 participants were included. The analysis revealed that MN combined with chemical peels (CP) exhibited the best results in terms of degree of improvement, patient satisfaction, and treatment efficacy compared to other treatments examined, including MN alone, MN with hyaluronic acid (HA), MN with botulinum toxin­A (TA), MN with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), PRP alone, CP, and laser therapy. The results for MN combined with additional treatments were obviously better than for MN alone. Side effects such as erythema, pain, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation showed no significant differences across all treatments assessed.

High-powered 675-nm laser: Safety and efficacy in clinical evaluation and in vitro evidence for different skin disorders.

BACKGROUND: Laser technology is a viable therapeutic option for treating a number of skin pathologic conditions, including pigmented lesions, vascular lesions and acne scars. AIM: In this work, through in vitro and clinical investigations we test the efficacy, the safety and the speed of treatment of high-powered laser system emitting a 675-nm in the management of various skin condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro experiments were performed irradiating adult human dermal fibroblasts cells (HDFa) with 675-nm laser for 24, 48 and 72 h with different fluences and Ki-67+ cells were counted. The confocal microscopy images of control and treated samples were acquired. Clinical skin rejuvenation/diseases treatments with 675 nm laser device were performed with different laser parameters in 11 patients with pigmented lesions, 5 patients with acne scars and 23 patients for skin rejuvenation. Data were evaluated with the validated global score using 5-point scales (GAIS) and patient's satisfaction scale. RESULTS: The application of the high-power 675 nm laser has proven effective in stimulating cell proliferation in in vitro experiments and it led to good results for all skin pathologies. GAIS showed values between 3 and 4 points for all treated pathologies, all scores between '75%-good improvements' and '100%-excellent improvements'. The treatment time was reduced by 50% compared to the old parameters setting, resulting in a faster and good patient's satisfying technique. No serious adverse effects were recorded. CONCLUSION: the preclinical and clinical data confirm the efficacy and safety of this high-powered 675 nm laser for several skin condition.

Microneedling with PRP for Acne Scars: A New Tool in Dermatologist Arsenal - A Scoping Review.

Acne scars can greatly impact patient quality of life. While treatment options have included mi- croneedling, the recent addition of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to this regimen has led to an increased popularity of combination treatment. Here, we aimed to review the efficacy of microneedling and PRP therapies and review the literature on combination treatment for acne scars.

Comparison of the fractionated Nd: YAG 1064-nm picosecond laser with holographic optics and the fractional CO2 laser in atrophic acne scar treatment: a prospective, randomized, split-face study.

KEY POINT: The 1064-nm picosecond laser with holographic optics demonstrated significant efficacy in treating atrophic acne scars. BACKGROUND: Picosecond lasers with fractionated optics have enabled the development of a breakthrough skin rejuvenation method. The authors compared the fractionated, non-ablative neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet 1064-nm picosecond laser with holographic optics and the fractional CO2 laser in treating atrophic acne scars. METHODS: One side of each patient's face was randomly allocated and treated with three sessions of the 1064-nm picosecond laser with holographic optics at 2-month intervals. In contrast, the other side was treated with the fractional CO2 laser. Participants were followed up 3 months after the final session. The primary outcome included the physicians' evaluation using the ECCA grading scale and a four-point scale to assess improvement. The patients' assessment of progress, their overall satisfaction and preferences, and the side effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two lasers in terms of the mean ECCA scores after treatments (P = 0.209). The physicians' improvement assessment was more significant for the fractional CO2 laser (P = 0.001). The patients' evaluation of improvement and subjective satisfaction were consistent with physicians' four-point scale results. The picosecond laser side had fewer adverse effects (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The fractionated, non-ablative Nd: YAG 1064-nm picosecond laser with holographic optics and the fractional CO2 laser were effective and safe in treating atrophic acne scars. Significantly better clinical outcomes were observed with the fractional CO2 laser, whereas fewer adverse effects were noted with the 1064-nm picosecond laser with holographic optics.

Energy-Based Devices for the Treatment of Facial Skin Conditions in Skin of Color.

Background: The development of microfocused ultrasound and fractional radiofrequency-based devices has expanded the range of cosmetic treatment options for patients with skin of color. Fractional non-ablative laser treatments can also be safely performed in skin types III-VI with appropriate settings and adjunctive topical treatments. Objective: We sought to review the available literature on the use of energy-based devices for treatment of facial skin conditions in skin types III-VI. Methods: A PubMed search was performed on studies from 2010-2021 assessing safety and efficacy of fractional ablative and non-ablative lasers, radiofrequency, and microfocused ultrasound-based treatments for conditions such as acne scars, melasma, benign pigmented lesions, rhytids, and skin laxity in skin types III-VI. Results: Seven randomized trials, fourteen prospective cohort studies, and six retrospective reviews were included. Combination treatment with fractional radiofrequency and non-ablative laser has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acne scars in skin of color with minimal adverse effects. Laser-assisted drug delivery with low-density 1927-nm thulium or diode lasers has been shown to reduce the number of treatments required for significant clearance of melasma as compared with other modalities. Microfocused ultrasound has been shown to safely treat skin laxity in skin of color. Limitations: There is a paucity of studies which include patients with skin type VI, limiting our overall understanding of the safety of these treatments in skin of color. Conclusion: There are numerous available studies demonstrating safety and efficacy of energy-based devices for the treatment of facial skin conditions in skin types III-VI, but the significant variation among their designs, methods of assessment, and study populations highlights the need for larger meta-analyses to further interpret their results.

Subcision with and without suction for acne scars: a split-faced, rater-blinded randomized control trial.

Therapeutic options for acne scars include subcision and suction with microdermabrasion, but these treatment modalities have not been studied in conjunction. To compare effectiveness of subcision alone versus subcision with suction for the treatment of facial acne scars. Randomized, split-faced, evaluator-blinded control trial. Participants underwent one subcision treatment on both sides of the face followed by 10 sessions of suction to one side. Photographs at baseline, 1-month, and 4-months were assessed. Primary outcome measures were the validated Acne Scar Severity Scale (ASSS) (0 = no acne scarring, 4 = severe), Acne Scar Improvement Grading Scale (ASIGS) (-100 to 100%), and modified Quantitative Global Scarring Grades (QGSG) (point-based questionnaire instrument), as well as subject preference. Twenty-eight treatment areas and 154 treatments were analyzed. Dermatologist raters found no differences between subcision alone and subcision-suction at 1-month or 4-months. Mean subject-assessed percent improvement for subcision-suction was higher than that for subcision alone at 1-month (37% versus 24%, p = 0.04) but not at 4-months (p = 0.37). Subjects preferred combination therapy to monotherapy at 1-month (50% vs. 21%) and 4-months (43% vs. 21%). While blinded raters did not detect significant differences, subjects perceived combination treatment as working more quickly than monotherapy, and preferred combination treatment at all time points.Clinical trial registration NCT01696513 on Clinicaltrials.gov.

Split face randomized, evaluator blinded study on the effect of multiple subcisions on rolling acne scars.

Acne scarring results from a common inflammatory condition present in many people. These scars can have an impact on quality of life by influencing self-esteem and social acceptance. Current acne scarring treatments, such as chemical peels and laser treatments, often have limited success due to their time-consuming nature and the variability of acne scar types. The subcision technique has shown promise for the treatment of rolling acne scars. There are few studies to date that examine the effects of multiple subcision treatments on rolling acne scars. We evaluated whether the use of multiple subcision treatments improved the appearance of rolling acne scars compared to no treatment. Five patients with rolling acne scars on both sides of their face who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. One side of the face was randomized to receive treatment, while the contralateral side of the face received no treatment. Subjects underwent five sequential subcision treatments, spaced 4 weeks apart, with two follow-up visits at weeks 20 and 36 from the 1st treatment. Photographs were taken before and after the initial treatment visit and at each subsequent visit. Acne scar appearance was evaluated by the subject, a blinded live rater, and two double-blinded dermatologist raters. Evaluations of treatment outcomes involved overall acne scar appearance on a 5-point scale, acne scar improvement on a percentage scale, a modified quantitative global scarring grading system, and potential treatment side effects. There was a greater decrease in global scarring scores in the multiple subcision side compared to the control side. There was a greater difference in the average acne scar appearance scores between the Week 36 follow-up visit and baseline for the multiple subcision side compared to that of the control side. 50% of patients reported being more satisfied with the treatment side compared to the control side in regard to overall improvement. The study results suggest that multiple subcision treatments may improve the appearance of rolling acne scars compared to no treatment.

Fractional Radiofrequency and Oral Isotretinoin-A Prospective Randomized Controlled Split-Face Trial Comparing Concurrent Versus Delayed Fractional Radiofrequency Treatment for Acne Scars.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic dogma has been to treat acne scars no less than 6 months after isotretinoin (ITN) cessation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fractional radiofrequency (FRF) in patients treated concurrently with ITN. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized control 3-arm comparative trial to evaluate the treatment of acne scars. Patients received one of three treatment options: (A) ITN and FRF concurrent treatment, (B) ITN monotherapy, and (C) FRF 6 months post-ITN treatment. Patients in the FRF cohorts received three monthly sessions. Patients were followed for adverse effects up to 6-9 months post-FRF treatment. Final cosmesis was scored by three independent dermatologists using two scales: the Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acne (ECCA) and an internal 5-point investigator's scale, indicating the percentage of improvement. Subjective analyses by patients were also assessed. RESULTS: Objective and subjective analyses revealed improvement in the ITN-FRF cohort, which was superior to the delayed FRF cohort and the ITN monotherapy cohort. Specifically, the concurrently treated cohort (ITN-FRF) had a significant reduction in acne scar volume from baseline mean (151.1 ± 44.7 to 97.0 ± 31.2, p < 0.005), outperforming both the delayed FRF and monotherapy ITN treatment cohorts, respectively (155.4 ± 37.8 to 122.0 ± 46.2, 144.6 ± 82.8 to 132.4 ± 62.7). Additionally, the concurrently treated cohort demonstrated improved ECCA scores (36.8 ± 15.5), significantly better than the ITN monotherapy cohort (101.5 ± 20.1, p < 0.01). LIMITATIONS: Limited patient sample size: 38 patients completed the study; mostly Fitzpatrick Type II-III skin; photographic assessments utilized. CONCLUSION: Per our prospective trial, concurrent treatment of ITN-FRF is superior to delayed FRF treatment 6 months post-ITN cessation.

Dezocine as preemptive analgesia alleviates ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment induced pain in patients with acne scars.

BACKGROUND: Ultrapluse CO2 fractional laser technology has emerged as an effective treatment for scar management. However, one drawback of this modality is the pain caused during the procedure. This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of dezocine (DZC) as preemptive analgesia for reduction of pain induced by ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment for acne scars. METHODS: The study cohort included 78 outpatients with acne scars between February and April 2023. Patients were randomly assigned into three groups with intravenous injection (iv) of DZC prior to laser treatment: (1) control, iv of saline; (2) DZC group 1 (DZC_1), iv of DZC at 0.15 mg/kg; and (3) DZC_2, iv of DZC at 0.20 mg/kg. After 30 min, one session of ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment on acne scars was performed. Hemodynamics, visual analogue scale (VAS), and anxiety visual analog test (AVAT) were monitored prior to, during, and after the procedure. RESULTS: Operative success rates for patients in the control, DZC_1, and DZC_2 groups were 34.6%, 84.6%, and 100%, respectively. DZC administered with either dosage significantly reduced the VAS and AVAT scores of patients in treatment groups as compared with the subjects in the control group during the course of ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment. Patients in DZC_1 and DZC_2 groups did not show any significant difference in hemodynamic parameters, VAS, and AVAT scores. Temporary adverse effects such as nausea and dizziness were observed in some subjects after treatment; the symptoms were quickly dissolved after a rest in supine position. CONCLUSIONS: DZC as preemptive analgesia could effectively reduce pain and anxiety induced by ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment in patients. This study provided an option of preemptive anesthesia to minimize the pain and discomforts associated with laser treatments in clinical practices.

PRP and its benefit as an adjunctive therapy with subcision and microneedling in atrophic scars: a comparative study.

Context: Scarring is a biological process of wound repair which leads to a difference in the normal structure and function of the skin and manifests as a depressed or raised area. Treatment of scars is challenging. A number of therapeutic approaches like surgical techniques and non-surgical techniques are performed to improve scarring. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of subcision followed by microneedling versus subcision followed by microneedling and topical platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in atrophic scars. Materials and Methods: A comparative prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in North India to compare the efficacy of subcision followed by microneedling versus subcision followed by microneedling and topical PRP. A total of 40 cases were taken and were randomly divided into two groups, A and B of 20 patients in each group. Topical PRP was applied as an additional therapy in Group B in the same sitting. Minimum three sittings were done in each patient at an interval of 4 weeks and results were assessed after 1 month of the third session. The statistical software used is Microsoft Excel and SPSS software program, version 24.0 for analysis of data and Microsoft Word to generate graphs and tables. Results: Improvement in scar grading was more in Group B as compared to Group A with statistically significant difference (P = 0.032). There was an improvement in scar grading from grade 4 scar to grade 2 in 15% and 30% patients of Groups A and B, respectively, with improvement in skin texture and pigmentation more in Group B. Conclusion: PRP proved to add to the improvement of grade of atrophic scars when combined with subcision and microneedling.

Efficacy of autologous platelet rich plasma with subcision vs platelet rich plasma with microneedling in atrophic acne scars: A single-center, prospective, intra-individual split-face comparative study.

Background: Severe post-acne scarring has been implicated as a cause of considerable psychological distress, mainly among adolescents. Subcision and microneedling are cutting-edge treatment options available nowadays. Aim: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of microneedling with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) against subcision with PRP in treating atrophic post-acne scars in a split-face study design. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with atrophic post-acne facial scars were included in this prospective interventional study. Group A included the left side of the face managed by microneedling with PRP and group B included the right side of the face that was subjected to subcision with PRP. Results were assessed based on Goodman and Baron qualitative and quantitative grading. Results: In our study, at the end of the treatment, on the left side, 5 (10%) had 1 grade of improvement showing good response, 35 (70%) had 2 grades of improvement showing very good response, and 10 (20%) had 3 grades of improvement showing excellent response. On the right side, 1 (2%) patient had no improvement in acne grade showing poor response, 9 (18%) had 1 grade of improvement showing good response, 25 (50%) had 2 grades of improvement showing very good response, whereas 15 (30%) had 3 grades of improvement showing excellent response. Conclusion: Till date, apart from ours no other study has compared the two modalities head-to-head with adjuvant PRP in both groups. Although both modalities showed statistically significant results individually, there was no significant difference in qualitative improvement of acne scars between the two groups.

Shedding Light on Acne Scars: A Comprehensive Review of CO2 vs. Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Therapy.

Acne scars pose a significant cosmetic concern and can have a profound impact on individuals' self-esteem and quality of life. Laser therapy has emerged as a promising treatment modality for improving the appearance of acne scars by promoting collagen remodeling and tissue regeneration. This comprehensive review compares two commonly used laser modalities, CO2 and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG), focusing on their mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profiles, and patient outcomes. While CO2 lasers offer deeper tissue penetration and the potential for more significant improvement in severe acne scars, Er:YAG lasers provide a gentler approach with a lower risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Recommendations for clinical practice include tailoring treatment approaches to individual patient characteristics, educating patients about treatment expectations and post-treatment care, considering combination therapies for enhanced outcomes, and implementing regular follow-up care. Areas for further research include long-term outcome studies, investigation of laser therapy in ethnically diverse populations, exploration of combination therapies, and evaluation of emerging laser technologies. This review aims to provide clinicians and patients with valuable insights to inform treatment decisions and optimize outcomes in managing acne scars.

Minimally Invasive Post-Acne Scars Treatment with the Hybrid Filler HArmonyCa™.

Acne, a chronic inflammatory condition of the pilo-sebaceous unit, often results in scarring with significant aesthetic and psychological consequences for patients. While various treatments exist, including surgical and non-surgical approaches, a combined method has shown promise in effectively addressing acne scarring. Lipofilling, with its adipose-derived stem cells, has emerged as a promising technique for volume restoration and collagen stimulation but may not be suitable for all patients, especially those who prefer non-surgical treatments. Recently, a novel approach involving simultaneous injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHa) has been introduced in the literature, showing lifting properties, improving dermal thickness and skin texture, and inducing neocollagenesis. HArmonyCa™ (Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company) is a hybrid filler combining HA (20 mg/mL) and CaHa 55.7% (microspheres 25-45 µm) with 0.3% lidocaine in a 1.25-ml syringe. It has demonstrated volumizing, lifting, and skin-tightening effects, along with increased fullness, elasticity, and turgor of the skin. It has also shown an increase in viscoelasticity, suggesting new collagen formation, making it suitable for treating conditions like solar elastosis. Compared to lipofilling, HArmonyCa™ offers a non-surgical alternative with comparable outcomes and patient satisfaction. These findings have led us to employ this hybrid filler for the treatment of post-acne scarring. We present a case of a 35-year-old woman with post-acne scarring, treated with HArmonyCa™ combined with Volite™ injections, CO2 laser resurfacing, and chemical peels. Significant improvement in skin texture, reduction of shadowing effect, and restoration of tissue elasticity were observed, resulting in high patient satisfaction. While HArmonyCa™ presents a promising solution for post-acne scarring, further research is needed to comprehensively evaluate its efficacy and suitability. This study contributes to the growing body of literature exploring the potential applications of hybrid fillers, particularly in addressing post-acne scarring.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Combining platelet rich plasma with ablative laser for post acne scars: A review.

Background Acne scars are one of the most common sequelae of inflammatory acne. It commonly affects adolescents and young adults and hence is associated with significant psychological morbidity. It is historically resistant to oral as well as surgical modalities. In the last two decades, ablative lasers (fractional or otherwise) have proven to be effective in management of acne scars. Some studies have proven the efficacy of platelet rich plasma in reducing the adverse effects and improving the efficacy of lasers. Objective Review of the studies combining platelet rich plasma with ablative laser for post acne scars. Methods A literature review of the MEDLINE database for studies evaluating the combination of ablative lasers with platelet rich plasma was performed. Only studies with higher levels of evidence (randomised controlled trials and comparative studies) were included in this review. Results Adding intradermal platelet rich plasma to fractional ablative lasers in the management of post acne scars increases clinical efficacy, reduces downtime as well as frequency and duration of ablative lasers related adverse effects. The efficacy of topical platelet rich plasma is less as compared to intradermal platelet rich plasma. Limitations The studies analysed are heterogeneous in nature with varied protocols and duration of follow up. Conclusions It is recommended to combine the ablative lasers with intradermal platelet rich plasma for better clinical response and reduce adverse effects as well as downtime.