Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of hedgehog pathway inhibitors in patients with basal cell carcinoma: Experience of a tertiary Australian centre.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) are the most common cancers worldwide. Although most BCCs are amenable to local treatment, there are limited therapeutic options for surgically unresectable locally advanced and metastatic BCCs. Activation of the sonic hedgehog signalling pathway plays a significant role in the development of most BCCs. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HPIs) can be used to inhibit this pathway. Efficacy and safety data on HPI use in Australia is scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to present the effectiveness and safety of HPI at a tertiary dermatology referral centre. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical charts of all patients with BCC treated with an HPI at a tertiary Dermatology referral centre in New South Wales, Australia from 1 January 2016 to 1 July 2023. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with BCCs were treated with an HPI; 11 locally advanced, 8 multiple, 3 basal cell naevus syndrome and 1 metastatic. All patients were of Caucasian background, with a median age of 56. Across 41 treatment cycles, the median treatment duration was 4 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 20/23 (87%) and complete response (CR) rate was 9/23 (39%); patients treated with sonidegib achieved an ORR of 11/12 (92%) and CR of 4/12 (33%), and vismodegib-treated patients achieved an ORR of 9/11 (82%) and CR of 5/11 (45%). Patients who responded to HPI treatment also responded to a subsequent HPI rechallenge. Common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included muscle spasms, dysgeusia and alopecia. Dysgeusia was more frequent with vismodegib than sonidegib (p = 0.0001). There was no evidence to suggest a difference in other TEAEs between the two HPIs. Four treatment cycles were stopped due to grade 3 muscle spasm. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of 23 patients being treated with HPI, the ORR was 87% and CR was 39%. All patients who experienced TEAEs and had a drug holiday successfully responded to HPI rechallenge. TEAEs, particularly muscle spasms, are common reasons for treatment cessation. Clinicians should implement strategies to mitigate TEAE to improve drug survivability.

Metabolic Imaging of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sonidegib: A Retrospective Case Series Study.

Background: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a firmly established tool in oncology and is gaining importance in dermato-oncology. However, its use in advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is limited, with only a few case reports and a single study focused on vismodegib. This study evaluates the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in advanced BCC treated with sonidegib. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the clinical data of patients with advanced BCC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT between January 2022 and January 2024. Inclusion criteria included histologically confirmed BCC, FDG-avid lesions on baseline PET/CT, and a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Metabolic response was assessed using the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). Results: Four patients with advanced BCC treated with sonidegib were included, presenting with a total of 10 hypermetabolic lesions at baseline PET/CT. The mean interval between baseline and follow-up scans was 8.7 ± 1.6 months. According to PERCIST, two patients achieved a complete metabolic response (CMR), while the other two had stable metabolic disease (SMD). Low baseline-standardized uptake values (i.e., SUVmax, SUVmean) and reduced total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were associated with CMR. No relapses were observed during follow-up. Conclusions: This study suggests that 18F-FDG PET/CT may help identify advanced BCC patients who are likely to benefit from sonidegib treatment. Further research is needed to fully explore the potential of PET/CT in this specific clinical context.

Hedgehog Pathway and Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitors for Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is treated with local surgery or noninvasive treatment modalities. If a BCC remains untreated, it can develop into a locally advanced BCC or a metastatic BCC. Case Presentation: Here we report in detail the management of three complex advanced BCC (aBCC) after treatment failure with vismodegib. On all tumors, next generation DNA sequencing in the Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment-02 (CPCT-02) study was performed; subsequently, patients were included in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) trial, in which treatment was started with commercially available targeted anticancer drugs based on the molecular tumor profile. All patients showed partial response or stable disease following treatment with second line PD-1 inhibitors with an average duration of response of 12.3 months. Discussion/Conclusion: Immunotherapy can be a treatment option for aBCC resistant to hedgehog pathway inhibitor treatment. However, despite the high tumor mutational burden of aBCCs, immunotherapy does not always lead to a long response. Rechallenge or combining treatment of hedgehog inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors by parallel or alternating cycles may be a strategy to lengthen the treatment response.

Quality of life in cemiplimab-treated patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma in a Phase II clinical trial.

Aim: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cemiplimab-treated patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC).Materials & methods: Eighty-four patients with laBCC received cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks (up to 9 cycles). HRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Skindex-16 questionnaires at baseline and each cycle. Mixed-effects repeated-measures models evaluated change from baseline across cycles.Results: Clinically meaningful improvement or maintenance was reported by 62-90% of patients on QLQ-C30 scales and by approximately 80% on Skindex-16 scales at Cycle 2, with consistent results at Cycle 9 except fatigue.Conclusion: Most cemiplimab-treated patients with laBCC reported improvement or maintenance of HRQoL with low symptom burden except fatigue.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03132636, registered 28 April 2017.

Locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) is a type of skin cancer that has the potential to invade surrounding tissues including bone, cartilage, nerve and muscle. Cemiplimab-rwlc is approved in the US for patients with laBCC following a therapy called hedgehog inhibitor (HHI) treatment or for whom HHIs are not appropriate. In a Phase II clinical trial, intravenous (in the vein) cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks for up to nine treatment cycles resulted in clinically meaningful antitumor activity in patients with laBCC who progressed on or were intolerant to HHIs.This analysis evaluated health-related quality of life, symptom burden, emotions and functional status in these patients using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Skindex-16 questionnaires. Baseline scores (scores at the start of the clinical trial) showed moderate to high levels of functioning and low symptom burden that, except for fatigue, were maintained or improved over the course of cemiplimab treatment. These results show that despite the presence of fatigue, health-related quality of life and functional status were maintained with cemiplimab across the study duration.

Treatments on the horizon for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is one of the most common human cancers. Most cases of BCC are amenable to surgical and topical treatments with excellent prognosis if diagnosed timely and managed appropriately. However, in a small percentage of cases, it could be locally advanced BBC (laBCC) and not amenable to surgery or radiation, including recurrent, large tumors or tumors that invade deeper tissue. Hedgehog inhibitors (vismodegib and sonidegib) are approved as the first-line treatment of laBCC. PD-1 inhibitor immunotherapy (cemiplimab) is indicated for cases that progressed on or could not tolerate hedgehog inhibitors or when hedgehog inhibitors are contraindicated. Given the modest response and bothersome side effects of some of the agents above, there are reports of novel treatments, and clinical trials are currently evaluating multiple agents.

Surgery after sonidegib treatment achieves complete response in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the face.

Basal cell carcinoma accounts for 75% of skin cancers worldwide and is the most common malignancy in Caucasians. Since chronic ultraviolet exposure is the major risk factor for its development, sun-exposed areas such as the face are frequently affected. The gold-standard treatment is surgical excision. Radiotherapy may be considered in selected cases such as unresectable primary tumors. In some patients, when the risk of a significant functional/cosmetic deficit advises against both surgery and radiotherapy, target therapy (hedgehog pathway inhibitors) can be administered alone or in a neoadjuvant setting, to reduce the tumor size and make it eligible for surgery. Vismodegib as a neoadjuvant treatment before surgery has been investigated in a single, multicentre, open-label, phase II trial (VISMONEO); however, sonidegib has not yet been evaluated in this setting. We report the cases of two patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the face who achieved complete remission with sonidegib followed by a more limited surgical excision than would have been needed without target therapy.

Sonidegib in Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Monocentric Retrospective Experience and a Review of Published Real-Life Data.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents the most common skin cancer and locally advanced BCC (laBCC) refers to an aggressive, large, infiltrative BCC that cannot be treated by surgery or radiotherapy. Sonidegib is a Hedghehog inhibitor (HHi) indicated for laBCC. This is a monocentric retrospective real-life study of laBCCs receiving Sonidegib treatment. Although Sonidegib is widely used, since its approval by Food and Drug Administration in 2015, only a limited number of real-life experiences have been reported. Eleven patients, including four patients diagnosed with Basal Cell Naevus syndrome, received treatment with Sonidegib for laBCCs. Seven (63.6%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) but only three had to discontinue treatment and were therefore excluded from the following results. Four patients (50%) achieved complete clinical remission (CR); in all cases the remission was confirmed by biopsy. Partial response (PR) was found in three patients out of eight (37.5%). One patient out of eight (12.5%) showed a steady disease (SD). None of the patients showed signs of progression during treatment with HHi. Sonidegib showed the same efficacy in treating laBCCs as already seen in trials. All four patients suffering from Basal Cell Naevus syndrome achieved disease control by being treated with Sonidegib. Consequently, we strongly advise the joint management of laBCCs through a multidisciplinary team whenever feasible.

Qualitative Patient Interviews to Characterize the Human Burden of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Following Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence of patients' experiences of living with advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) are limited, particularly after hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HHI) treatment. We explored the burden of aBCC on symptoms and patients' everyday lives post HHI treatment. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured, approximately 1-h qualitative interviews of US patients with aBCC and prior HHI treatment were conducted. Data were assessed using thematic analysis with NVivo 1.0 software. Saturation analysis was performed to ensure all concepts were captured. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (median age, 63 years; locally advanced BCC, n = 9; metastatic BCC, n = 6) were interviewed. A patient-led conceptual model was developed from the responses using 10 symptoms and 15 impact categories (comprising emotional/psychological, physical, and social domains) identified as most commonly discussed and important to patients. Overall, reported impacts were discussed more commonly than reported symptoms. Impacts most commonly discussed were related to emotions (e.g., anxiety, worry, fear [n = 14; 93%]; low mood, depression [n = 12; 80%]) and physical function (e.g., hobbies or leisure activities [n = 13; 87%]). Symptoms most commonly discussed were fatigue and tiredness (n = 14; 93%) and itch (n = 13; 87%). Out of all reported impacts and symptoms, fatigue and tiredness (n = 7, 47%) and anxiety, worry, and fear (n = 6; 40%) were most bothersome to patients. As a descriptive exercise, participant responses were mapped to commonly used patient-reported outcome scales in aBCC clinical trials. Most expressed concepts were captured across two common measures in oncology/skin conditions (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core 30 [EORTC QLQ-C30] and Skindex-16 questionnaires), but sun avoidance and others' perception of skin cancer were not explicitly mentioned by these instruments. CONCLUSION: Patients with aBCC experienced a significant disease burden post first-line HHI therapy, including major emotional and lifestyle impacts. Accordingly, through this study, patients with aBCC highlighted a significant unmet need for second-line treatment options post HHI therapy.

Retrospective Real-Life Data, Efficacy and Safety of Vismodegib Treatment in Patients with Advanced and Multiple Basal Cell Carcinoma: 3-Year Experience from a Spanish Center.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer and can represent a therapeutic challenge in patients with locally advanced disease. Vismodegib is a hedgehog pathway inhibitor approved by the FDA for use in this type of tumor. We present a case series to describe our experience with the use of vismodegib. METHODS: A retrospective study that included patients treated with vismodegib at our dermatology unit was conducted. Monthly follow-up was performed, and we registered the clinical evolution and adverse reactions. RESULTS: A total of six patients with locally advanced BCCs were included (50% males and 50% females), with a mean age of 78.5 years old. The treatment was administered over a mean of 5 months. A complete response was observed in four cases and partial response in two cases. No recurrence was detected, with a median follow-up duration after discontinuation of 18 months. Most patients (83%) had at least one adverse event, and two needed dose adjustment temporarily or permanently to continue. The main adverse effect was muscle spasms (66.7%). The main limitation of our study was the small sample, which was not representative of the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Vismodegib is a safe and effective treatment for locally advanced BCC, and its role in unresectable BCC seems to be an important option in these challenging cases.

Combined cemiplimab and radiotherapy for advanced basal cell carcinoma: A case report.

Advanced basal cell carcinoma may be treated with systemic therapies such as hedgehog pathway inhibitors or programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors, namely cemiplimab. We report a case of a 70-year-old man with a nodulo-infiltrative advanced basal cell carcinoma over the right posterior neck and scapula. The patient had a partial response to the hedgehog pathway inhibitor, vismodegib. The tumour progressed, and the patient was switched from vismodegib to radiotherapy combined with cemiplimab, which led to a significant reduction in pain, bleeding, and tumour size. A combined treatment approach with radiotherapy and cemiplimab may be beneficial for advanced basal cell carcinoma cases that progress after treatment with hedgehog pathway inhibitors.

Atezolizumab for the treatment of advanced recurrent basal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma of bladder: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The use of checkpoint inhibitors has become increasingly important in the treatment of different cancers, including advanced muscle-invasive urothelial cancer and even in basal cell carcinoma. We present the case of a patient with advanced basal cell carcinoma and metastatic muscle-invasive urothelial cancer, who was treated with the programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor, atezolizumab for both cancers. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old Caucasian female patient, with a history of smoking without any comorbidities developed periocular basal cell carcinoma, which was surgically removed but relapsed 4 years later. Surgical excision was carried out twice, but with positive margins, therefore definitive radiotherapy was given. Subsequently, the patient developed non-muscle-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, which was removed by transurethral resection. Follow-up was irregular owing to the patient's inadequate compliance, and within 2 years, the patient's cancer relapsed and histology confirmed muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Definitive radiochemotherapy was not accepted by the patient. Meanwhile, the patient's basal cell carcinoma had also progressed, despite receiving vismodegib therapy. Therefore, the patient was administered epirubicin-cisplatin. Having reached the maximum cumulative dose of epirubicin, treatment with this chemotherapeutic agent could not be continued. The patient developed bladder cancer metastasis in her left suprainguinal lymph nodes. Owing to the presence of both types of tumors, programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor atezolizumab treatment was chosen. In just over 1 year, the patient received 17 cycles of atezolizumab altogether, which was tolerated well without any adverse or side effects. Follow-up imaging scans indicated complete remission of the metastatic bladder cancer and stable disease of the basal cell carcinoma. The patient subsequently passed away in hospital due to a complication of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our patient attained stable disease in advanced basal cell carcinoma and complete remission in metastatic muscle-invasive urothelial cancer after receiving programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor, atezolizumab, therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to report the use of programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor, atezolizumab, as treatment for advanced basal cell carcinoma. This case may also be of interest for clinicians when treating patients with two synchronous cancers.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab, an anti-PD1 immunotherapy, in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma, after failure or intolerance to sonic Hedgehog inhibitors: UNICANCER AcSé NIVOLUMAB trial.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human malignancy. In most cases, BCC has slow progression and can be definitively cured by surgery or radiotherapy. However, in rare cases, it can become locally advanced or, even more rarely, metastatic. The alternative recommended treatments are Sonic Hedgehog pathway inhibitors; however, the response is often short-lived. METHODS: This was a phase 2 basket study (NCT03012581) evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in a cohort of 32 advanced BCC patients, enrolled after failure of Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors, including 29 laBCC (91%) and 3 mBCC (9%). RESULTS: Compared to previously published studies, our population consisted of severe patients with a poor prognosis because they had already received multiple lines of treatment: all patients received previous Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors, 53% of patients already had chemotherapy and 75% radiotherapy. At 12 weeks, we reported 3.1% of complete responses, 18.8% of partial responses, and 43.8% of stable diseases. The best response rate to nivolumab reached 12.5% of complete responses (four patients), 18.8% of partial responses (three patients), and 43.8% of stable diseases (14 patients). Adverse events (AE) were mostly grade 2 or 3, slightly different to the adverse events observed in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (higher rate of diabetes, no thyroid dysfunction). CONCLUSION: Nivolumab is a relevant therapeutic option for patients with advanced relapsing/refractory BCC.

Reinduction of Hedgehog Inhibitors after Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Series of 12 Patients.

For patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) first-line treatment with hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) and second-line treatment with PD1 inhibitors (PD1i) is available, offering combination and sequencing options. Here, we focus on the efficacy and safety of HHI reinduction after PD1i failure. Retrospective data analysis was performed with 12 patients with aBCC (locally advanced (n = 8)/metastatic (n = 4)). These patients (male:female 6:6, median age 68 years) initially received HHIs, leading to complete/partial response (66%) or stable disease (33%). Median treatment duration was 20.8 (2-64.5) months until discontinuation due to progression (n = 8), adverse events (n = 3), or patient request (n = 1). Subsequent PD1 inhibition (pembrolizumab 42%, cemiplimab 58%) yielded a partial response (8%), stable disease (33%), or progression (59%). Median treatment duration was 4.1 (0.8-16.3) months until discontinuation due to progression (n = 9), adverse events (n = 1), patient request (n = 1), or missing drug approval (n = 1). HHI reinduction resulted in complete/partial response (33%), stable disease (50%), or progression (17%). Median treatment duration was 3.6 (1-29) months. Response duration in the four responding patients was 2-29+ months. Thus, a subgroup of patients with aBCC responded to reinduction of HHI following PD1i failure. Therefore, this sequential treatment represents a feasible treatment option.

Complete pathologic clearance with vismodegib in advanced basal cell carcinoma of the scalp with cranial invasion.

The management of advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can be challenging and often involves a multi-disciplinary approach with dermatologists, plastic surgeons, and oncologists. Standard therapy for advanced BCCs has historically involved prompt excision and radiation; however, in recent years, management strategies utilizing hedgehog pathway inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy have gained popularity. While controversy regarding management recommendations still exists, we present a case of advanced BCC with cranial involvement in an immunocompromised patient where the use of neoadjuvant vismodegib led to a favorable outcome and, surprisingly, complete the pathologic clearance of the tumor.

Benefit-risk assessment of sonidegib and vismodegib in the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.

Background: Sonidegib and vismodegib are Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HhIs) that play a relevant role in the management of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC). This study compared the efficacy and safety of both HhIs based on their available data using effect size measures such as number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH). Methods: We reviewed data from pivotal trials of sonidegib (BOLT) and vismodegib (ERIVANCE). The NNT for sonidegib and vismodegib was calculated from objective response rate (ORR) values. The NNH was calculated from data relating to treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and incidence of AEs. The LHH was calculated as the ratio between the corresponding NNH and NNT. Results: For sonidegib (200 mg), the NNT for ORR at 18 months was 1.65 (95% CI 1.35-2.01) whilst that for vismodegib (150 mg) at 21 months was 2.10 (95% CI 1.65-2.82). The NNH related to treatment discontinuation due to AEs was 1.9 (95% CI 1.6-2.5) for sonidegib and 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.2) for vismodegib. The LHH for sonidegib and vismodegib related to treatment discontinuation due to AEs was 1.14 and 0.84, respectively, whilst the LHH according to AEs of grade ≥3 was 1.41 for sonidegib and 0.85 for vismodegib. Conclusions: Sonidegib showed a better benefit-risk ratio compared to vismodegib, being more likely to achieve therapeutic response than to AEs leading to discontinuation. These results should be confirmed in clinical practice and/or in a direct comparison study.