RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Etoposide phosphate is a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat various malignant neoplasms. Hypersensitivity reactions may occur with its use, and in rare cases, an anaphylactic reaction can manifest. Available options for patients experiencing hypersensitivity reactions include premedication, changing treatment, or undergoing desensitization. Various pediatric desensitization protocols have been described, ranging from six to fifteen steps, while published adult cases are rare. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 61-year-old woman with small-cell lung cancer and brain metastases. In November 2019, she underwent the second cycle of cisplatin and etoposide phosphate treatment. While receiving etoposide phosphate, she experienced dyspnea and suffered a cardiorespiratory arrest, leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and subsequent admission to the Intensive Care Unit. Her acute tryptase levels were notably elevated at 18â µg/L (compared to a baseline tryptase level of 6,6â µg/L) during the reaction. CASE MANAGEMENT: We implemented a 16-step desensitization protocol (without premedication) under close monitoring in an intermediate care unit. The protocol was successfully executed over three cycles until tumor progression mandated a modification in systemic treatment. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of successful desensitization to etoposide phosphate in a patient who experienced cardiac arrest during a hypersensitivity reaction. Although protocols of varying lengths have been published, we emphasize the importance of individualizing each protocol to fit the severity of the reaction and the resources and experience of each unit.
RESUMO
Uronium peptide coupling agents (HBTU, HATU, and HCTU) create a special hazard as they are immune sensitizers. Few reported cases are mentioned in the literature; despite that, it is important to raise the awareness on the subject and to highlight the risk and potential symptoms that could occur to those who directly work in contact with uronium peptide coupling agents, as well as to the safety deputies in the universities and industries. Based on a personal experience, the health impact of laboratory exposure to HBTU is described, and the insights gained from the experience are developed. A skin irritation reaction and allergy symptoms induced by HBTU exposure are shown here as well as the rate of worsening of symptoms since the first allergic reaction. Recommendations for handling coupling agents more safely in the research laboratory will also be given, and a casuistry of the matter to help other lab-users to recognize, assess, minimize, prepare for emergencies (RAMP) process.
RESUMO
Reactions to Vicryl have rarely been reported in the literature. Moreover, a reaction that begins less than 24 hours postoperatively is even rarer. We present a case of Vicryl hypersensitivity that developed within 24 hours at the site of the wounds following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and meniscal repair. A 32-year-old male patient underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and lateral meniscus repair due to an injury on the soccer field. On postoperative day one, erythema and edema were observed around the wounds, and the patient complained of itching and tenderness in the same areas. Despite local and systemic medication for infection, contact dermatitis, and antiseptic allergy, no improvement was noted. Vicryl hypersensitivity was suspected. Vicryl was removed, and a polydioxanone suture (PDS) was used instead, resulting in clinical improvement for the patient. In patients presenting with erythema, edema, blistering, itching, and tenderness around the wound, Vicryl hypersensitivity as a differential diagnosis can be considered after ruling out common causes. Hypersensitivity tests may be performed in suspected cases.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Polyglactin 910 sutures are commonly used in strabismus surgery due to their favorable handling and absorption qualities. However, their potential to cause allergic reactions is poorly documented in medical literature. This case report emphasizes this rare complication, stressing the importance of promptly recognizing and managing such reactions to ensure optimal patient outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: An 11-year-old girl with a history of left congenital partial third nerve palsy was treated with 8-0, polyglactin 910 sutures during a strabismus surgery. However, two days postoperatively, she experienced persistent redness, swelling, and pain in her left eye despite antibiotic therapy. After six days, the sutures were removed, resulting in an immediate reduction in symptoms. By the two-month follow-up, the patient fully recovered, with no signs of inflammation or complications. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case highlights a rare but crucial allergic reaction to polyglactin 910 sutures used in strabismus surgery. The patient's persistent inflammation, pain, and resistance to antibiotics indicated a localized allergic reaction, rather than an infection. The prompt resolution of symptoms after suture removal supports the diagnosis of suture-related allergic reaction. This case emphasizes the need to consider suture material as a potential cause of postoperative complications, especially when standard treatment fails. CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers should be alert to potential allergic reactions to sutures after strabismus surgery. Timely identification and removal are vital for resolving the symptoms and achieving optimal patient outcomes. This case emphasizes the importance of postoperative care protocols that consider allergies to suture material.
RESUMO
Human fibrinogen (FIB) has been clinically proven to be considerably effective for the treatment of postoperative bleeding, with reported cases of allergic reactions to human FIB being rare. Here, we report a case of an anaphylactic shock in 27-year-old patients with rheumatic heart valve disease who received a human FIB infusion during mitral valve replacement, aortic valve replacement, and tricuspid valve-shaping surgery. The patients showed generalised profuse sweating, a barely noticeable skin rash, faint pulse, systolic pressure < 50 mmHg, and a heart rate of 71 beats/min. We share insights from a case of severe allergy to human FIB infusion during cardiac surgery, through which we have gained experience in the processes of diagnosing and treating. This report aims to provide a preliminary summary of the characteristics of this case to serve as a reference for fellow clinicians.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Fibrinogênio , Humanos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Fibrinogênio/uso terapêutico , Fibrinogênio/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Cardiopatia Reumática/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Acute allergic reactions may occur in susceptible individuals following exposure to various allergens. Obesity is linked to allergic reactions, and weight loss from bariatric surgery may attenuate the severity of certain conditions such as airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma. This retrospective observational study investigates associations between prior bariatric surgery and lower risk for life-threatening conditions in patients hospitalized with acute allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with morbid obesity and admitted to US hospitals with acute allergic reactions/anaphylaxis were included. All data were extracted from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2005-2018. Patients without information on in-hospital mortality, discharge destination, hospital costs, and length of stay (LOS) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on prior bariatric surgery or not. All diagnoses were verified through ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Between-group differences and associations between variables were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: After matching, patients with prior bariatric surgery had significantly lower proportions of any life-threatening morbidity (37.2% vs. 47.4%), respiratory distress or failure (11.2% vs. 17.0%), pneumonia or severe infection (7.4% vs. 10.2%), sepsis/septic shock (15.2% vs. 20.9%), intubation and mechanical ventilation (11.2% vs. 14.6%), prolonged LOS (10.3% vs. 20.6%) and unfavorable discharge (6.9% vs. 12.5%) than those without prior bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: Prior bariatric surgery predicts a lower risk of life-threatening morbidity and prolonged LOS among adults hospitalized for acute allergic reaction and anaphylaxis. Future prospective studies are warranted to confirm the present findings and reveal underlying mechanisms.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Pontuação de Propensão , Humanos , Masculino , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Myopia represents a significant public health concern worldwide, particularly affecting the ocular health of children and adolescents. The escalating prevalence of myopia in recent years underscores its urgency as a health issue among this demographic. Research indicates a profound connection between the onset of myopia, inflammatory processes and fibrosis. Individuals with inflammatory conditions like allergic conjunctivitis, choroiditis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and diabetes exhibit a heightened susceptibility to myopia. Conversely, myopic patients are at an increased risk of developing ocular inflammatory disorders, notably idiopathic multifocal choroiditis. We postulate that the expression of inflammatory markers, including NF-κB, TGF-ß, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, may contribute to the chronic inflammatory state observed in myopia. This paper highlights a substantial correlation between myopia and inflammation, suggesting the potential efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents in managing inflammation and slowing myopia progression.
Assuntos
Inflamação , Miopia , Criança , Humanos , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Citocinas/metabolismo , Progressão da Doença , Inflamação/patologia , Miopia/epidemiologia , Miopia/metabolismo , Miopia/patologiaRESUMO
Key Clinical Message: The history of any allergy to the medications should be asked by physicians before administration of the medication. The coincidence of allergic and ACS symptoms after a short time of drug administration might be an indicator of Kounis syndrome. Allergic and coronary symptoms should be considered and treated. Abstract: Ischemic heart disease is still the leading cause of death worldwide. Some medications, including NSAIDS and antibiotics, can cause allergic reactions with cardiac manifestations due to spasms of the coronary arteries. In this case, we present a patient with chest pain syndrome due to a hypersensitivity reaction caused by an intramuscular (IM) diclofenac injection. The patient was a 51-year-old male who presented to the emergency department complaining of retrosternal chest pain, breathlessness, and pruritis that started half an hour after an IM diclofenac injection he had because of low back pain. The allergic symptoms subsided with an antihistamine injection, but chest pain and dyspnea remained stable. He was admitted due to the presence of ST-segment depression in leads II, III, and AVF and underwent percutaneous coronary angiography, which was normal. The patient was discharged with the diagnosis of Kounis syndrome, and he had an uneventful follow-up 1 year later. Kounis hypersensitivity-associated acute coronary syndrome, especially type I variant coronary spasm due to endothelial dysfunction is a type of acute myocardial syndrome. The following report describes an uncommon case of anaphylaxis-associated Kounis type I syndrome manifesting ST-segment changes in a male patient following an intramuscular injection of diclofenac.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as the most popular therapy for food allergy. However, data on the long-term adherence and efficacy of this approach are sparse. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the long-term adherence rates to OIT protocol and the associated risk of allergic reactions. METHODS: Patients who completed milk OIT and reached a maintenance dose of 200 mL of milk were surveyed biannually on their dairy consumption and occurrence of allergic reactions. A survival analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the risk of reaction and the adherence to OIT maintenance protocol. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 50 patients. Only 56% of the cohort adhered to the protocol, which consisted of ingesting a minimum of 200 mL of milk at least 3 times per week. Adherent patients had a significantly reduced risk of allergic reactions as well as a reduced incidence of anaphylaxis, health care/emergency room visits, and epinephrine/antihistamine administration. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate the importance of consistent maintenance dose consumption in the management of food allergies, with regular milk consumption contributing to the maintenance of unresponsiveness and decreased risk of allergic symptoms.
RESUMO
The frequency of food allergies varies between 2% and 10%, depending on characteristics including age, region, race, and method of diagnosis self-reported by patients or oral food challenges (OFCs). The most common allergies reported are tree nuts (1.2%), milk (1.9%), peanuts (2.2%), and shellfish (1.3%). Omalizumab injection has now been approved by the FDA for the treatment of immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergies in specific adults and children aged one year or older. This medication reduces the risk of allergic reactions (Type I), which can include anaphylaxis, when an individual accidentally encounters one or more food allergens. Omalizumab functions by binding to IgE and altering IgE-mediated pathways, which lessens IgE's capacity to cause allergic reactions. Promising outcomes from clinical trials and case studies include lowered anaphylactic risk and enhanced tolerance to allergens. Omalizumab, however, may have adverse effects; thus, close observation is required. Overall, this review sheds light on the efficacy, safety, and clinical implications of omalizumab, highlighting its potential as a useful intervention for IgE-mediated food allergies.
RESUMO
Solar urticaria is a rare idiopathic photodermatosis. According to the current knowledge its pathogenesis is most likely based on an allergic type I reaction to an autoantigen activated by ultraviolet (UV) radiation or visible light. As many of the patients suffer from severe forms of the disease, it may therefore severely impair the quality of life of those affected. In contrast, polymorphous light eruption is a very common disease, which, according to the current data, can be interpreted as a type IV allergic reaction to a photoallergen induced by UV radiation. As the skin lesions heal despite continued sun exposure, the patients' quality of life is generally not significantly impaired. These two clinically and pathogenetically very different light dermatoses have shared diagnostics by means of light provocation and an important therapeutic option (light hardening). Herein, we present an overview of the clinical picture, pathogenesis, diagnosis and available treatment options for the above-mentioned diseases.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Fotossensibilidade , Urticária , Humanos , Urticária/etiologia , Urticária/imunologia , Urticária/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Fotossensibilidade/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Fotossensibilidade/etiologia , Transtornos de Fotossensibilidade/terapia , Transtornos de Fotossensibilidade/imunologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Fotoalérgica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Fotoalérgica/etiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Urticária SolarRESUMO
Background: Hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Severe manifestations, despite being infrequent, can be life-threatening and represent an issue when re-administration of ICM is required. Clear recommendations on prevention and management of relapses are still lacking. Case summary: We present the cases of two patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome requiring urgent coronary angiography, with an anamnesis of ICM-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome. Both patients safely underwent a coronary angiography with the use of a different ICM (iobitridol) to the one linked to hypersensitivity manifestations, after premedication with corticosteroids and H1 antagonists. Discussion: Our experience highlights that in clinical situations in which the use of ICM is urgently needed, premedication with corticosteroids and H1 antagonists together with the choice of an alternative contrast agent (when the culprit is known) represents an effective strategy to perform a potentially life-saving procedure while avoiding serious systemic allergic reactions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of acute systemic and potentially life-threatening reactions triggered by mast and basophilic cells. Recent studies show a worldwide incidence between 50 and 112 occurrences per 100,000 person-years. The most identified triggers are food, medications, and insect venoms. We aimed to analyze triggers and clinical symptoms of patients presenting to a Swiss university emergency department for adults. METHODS: Six-year retrospective analysis (01/2013 to 12/2018) of all patients (> 16 years of age) admitted with moderate or severe anaphylaxis (classification of Ring and Messmer ≥ 2) to the emergency department. Patient and clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical database of the emergency department. RESULTS: Of the 531 includes patients, 53.3% were female, the median age was 38 [IQR 26-51] years. The most common suspected triggers were medications (31.8%), food (25.6%), and insect stings (17.1%). Organ manifestations varied among the different suspected triggers: for medications, 90.5% of the patients had skin symptoms, followed by respiratory (62.7%), cardiovascular (44.4%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (33.7%); for food, gastrointestinal symptoms (39.7%) were more frequent than cardiovascular symptoms (36.8%) and for insect stings cardiovascular symptoms were apparent in 63.8% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Average annual incidence of moderate to severe anaphylaxis during the 6-year period in subjects > 16 years of age was 10.67 per 100,000 inhabitants. Medications (antibiotics, NSAID and radiocontrast agents) were the most frequently suspected triggers. Anaphylaxis due to insect stings was more frequently than in other studies. Regarding clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms need to be better considered, especially that initial treatment with epinephrine is not delayed.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Imunoglobulina E , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G , Humanos , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Receptores de Neuropeptídeos/imunologia , Animais , Proteínas do Tecido NervosoRESUMO
The incidence of allergic reactions has risen steadily in recent years, prompting growing interest in the identification of efficacious and safe natural compounds that can prevent or treat allergic diseases. Phellodendron amurense Rupr. has long been applied as a treatment for allergic diseases, whose primary component is phellodendrine. However, the efficacy of phellodendrine as a treatment for allergic diseases remains to be assessed. Mast cells are the primary effectors of allergic reactions, which are not only activated by IgE-dependent pathway, but also by IgE-independent pathways via human MRGPRX2, rat counterpart MRGPRB3. As such, this study explored the effect and mechanism of phellodendrine through this family receptors in treating allergic diseases in vitro and in vivo. These analyses revealed that phellodendrine administration was sufficient to protect against C48/80-induced foot swelling and Evans blue exudation in mice, and suppressed C48/80-induced RBL-2H3 rat basophilic leukemia cells degranulation, and ß-HEX, HIS, IL-4, and TNF-α release. Moreover, phellodendrine could reduce the mRNA expression of MRGPRB3 and responsiveness of MRGPRX2 by altering its structure. It was able to decrease Ca2+ levels, phosphorylation levels of CaMK, PLCß1, PKC, ERK, JNK, p38, and p65, and inhibit the degradation of IκB-α. These analyses indicate that berberine inhibits the activation of PLC and downregulates the release of Ca2+ in the endoplasmic reticulum by altering the conformation of MRGPRB3/MRGPRX2 protein, thereby inhibiting the activation of PKC and subsequently inhibiting downstream MAPK and NF-κB signaling, ultimately suppressing allergic reactions. There may thus be further value in studies focused on developing phellodendrine as a novel anti-allergic drug.
Assuntos
Degranulação Celular , Hipersensibilidade , Mastócitos , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G , Animais , Ratos , Mastócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Mastócitos/imunologia , Degranulação Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Camundongos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Antialérgicos/farmacologia , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Citocinas/metabolismo , p-Metoxi-N-metilfenetilamina , Masculino , Phellodendron/química , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/metabolismo , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/genética , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , NF-kappa B/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores de NeuropeptídeosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current clinical criteria for identifying anaphylaxis do not account for unique aspects of infant anaphylaxis presentation and have not been validated in patients younger than 2 years of age. This may contribute to under recognition and is thus an unmet need. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate age-specific signs and symptoms that more accurately identify anaphylaxis in young children and to develop and compare modified criteria for "likely anaphylaxis" against the widely used 2006 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (NIAID/FAAN) criteria. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 337 clinical encounters presenting with suspected allergic or anaphylactic reactions to a pediatric emergency department. Modified criteria for likely anaphylaxis were developed and evaluated against the NIAID/FAAN criteria. RESULTS: The study population included 33% infants (age < 12 mo), 39% toddlers (age 12 mo to < 36 mo), and 29% children (age ≥ 36 mo). The NIAID/FAAN criteria captured 85% of all patient encounters in the study and the modified criteria captured 98% (P < .001). Compared with NIAID/FAAN criteria, modified criteria had 22.8% improved performance among infants (p < .001) and 10.3% improved performance among toddlers (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: We developed modified anaphylaxis clinical criteria that incorporated symptoms specific to infants and young children. The modified criteria increased identification of anaphylaxis in infants and potentially toddlers. Future research is needed to validate our findings on a larger cohort.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Lactente , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pré-Escolar , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
The widespread utilization of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been crucial for reducing transmission risk among healthcare workers (HCWs) and the public. However, the extensive use of PPE has brought about potential adverse reactions, particularly among HCWs. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of adverse skin reactions associated with PPE use among different categories of HCWs, including faculty, residents, and nursing officers (NOs), in a dedicated tertiary care COVID-19 hospital. The study design was a hospital-based cross-sectional analytical study conducted over one month, involving a total of 240 participants. The participants were required to complete a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire that covered demographic information, PPE-related data, preventive measures, observed reactions, and self-management strategies. Results indicated that adverse skin reactions were common among HCWs, with reactions reported by all participants. The most commonly used PPE included N95 masks, goggles, gloves, face shields, isolation gowns, and medical protective clothing. Excessive sweating (60% residents, 21.1% NOs, and 16.25% faculties), facial rash, dry palms (>70% of HCWs), and itching were among the most prevalent adverse reactions. Urticarial lesions (28.5% among NOs), pressure marks and pain (100% on the cheek among all HCWs), fungal infections (18.5% among residents at the web space of fingers), and skin breakdown were also reported. Factors such as age, gender, pre-existing skin problems, and oily/acne-prone skin history were found to be significantly associated with adverse skin reactions. In conclusion, the findings highlight the common adverse reactions reported by HCWs during the use of different PPEs. Certain steps taken by HCWs for the prevention of adverse reactions due to PPE emphasize the importance of tailored preventive measures and strategies to mitigate these adverse reactions, such as proper PPE selection, well-fitting equipment, regular breaks, and appropriate skincare practices. These insights contribute to the development of guidelines for optimal PPE usage and support the well-being of HCWs in their essential roles.