Early surgical outcomes in the composite-valve root replacement with bioprosthesis after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of composite-valve root replacement with bioprosthesis (b-CVRR) after acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) repair. METHODS: We included 41 patients who underwent b-CVRR after surgery for AAAD from 2007 to 2022. We excluded seven patients with VSRR, three with mechanical valve use, one with mycotic aneurysm, and one with cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESULTS: The overlapping surgical indications for b-CVRR were pseudoaneurysm in 21 patients (51.2%), severe AI in 19 (46.3%), re-dissection in 15 (36.6%), root dilatation (> 50 mm) in 12 (41.5%), and rupture in 3 (7.3%). The coronary artery reconstruction methods were bilateral Carrel patch in 13 patients (32%), Carrel patch with Piehler in 16 patients (38%), bilateral Piehler in six patients (15%), and Piehler with coronary artery bypass (CABG) in six patients (15%). Four patients who underwent the Carrel patch technique required additional intraoperative CABG. Three hospital mortality occurred (7.3%; myonephropathic metabolic syndrome, heart failure, bleeding from the thyroid carotid artery without injury). No thrombosis of the reconstructed site was observed with the Piehler procedure. CONCLUSION: Surgical outcomes for patients treated with b-CVRR after AAAD repair were acceptable. Intraoperative coronary artery events occurred due to stenosis caused by traction on the reconstructed coronary artery due to adhesions.

Aortic valve performance after remodelling versus reimplantation in a propensity-matched comparison.

OBJECTIVES: Both aortic root remodelling and aortic valve (AV) reimplantation have been used for valve-sparing root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm with or without aortic regurgitation. There is no clear evidence to support one technique over the another. This study aimed to compare remodelling with basal ring annuloplasty versus reimplantation on a multicentre level with the use of propensity-score matching. METHODS: This was a retrospective international multicentre study of patients undergoing remodelling or reimplantation between 2010 and 2021. Twenty-three preoperative covariates (including root dimensions and valve characteristics) were used for propensity-score matching. Perioperative outcomes were analysed along with longer-term freedom from AV reoperation/reintervention and other major valve-related events. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, 297 patients underwent remodelling and 281 had reimplantation. Using propensity-score matching, 112 pairs were selected and further compared. We did not find a statistically significant difference in perioperative outcomes between the matched groups. Patients after remodelling had significantly higher reintervention risk than after reimplantation over the median follow-up of 6 years (P = 0.016). The remodelling technique (P = 0.02), need for decalcification (P = 0.03) and degree of immediate postoperative AV regurgitation (P < 0.001) were defined as independent risk factors for later AV reintervention. After exclusion of patients with worse than mild AV regurgitation immediately after repair, both techniques functioned comparably (P = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: AV reimplantation was associated with better valve function in longer-term postoperatively than remodelling. If optimal immediate repair outcome was achieved, both techniques provided comparable AV function.

Anomalous coronary artery masquerading as a root abscess: a case report.

Congenital coronary artery anomalies are rare and most often clinically benign. We present a case of a 67-year-old male with osteomyelitis and persistent bacteremia with an anomalous left coronary artery mimicking an aortic root abscess. A transesophageal echocardiogram revealed a hypoechoic potential space around the aortic root, highly suspicious for a root abscess. Urgent cardiac surgery was performed, revealing no infection but an anomalous coronary artery arising from the right coronary sinus. This case highlights the importance of considering atypical anatomy in the diagnosis of infectious cardiac processes. While this resemblance should not delay intervention for suspected abscesses, it emphasizes the need to be aware of congenital differences in imaging for patients with known anomalies or asymptomatic patients with unknown anatomy.

Abnormal coronary arteries are rare and are usually not dangerous. We present a case of a 67-year-old male with an infection in the bone and persistent findings of bacteria in the blood who had an abnormal coronary artery that mimicked an infected space. Ultrasound of the heart found thickening and a space around the aortic root, highly suspicious for an infection in the setting of bacteria in the blood. Urgent surgery was performed, revealing no signs of infection but abnormal coronary artery anatomy. This case highlights the importance of considering atypical anatomy in the diagnosis of infection around the heart. While this should not delay intervention, it emphasizes the need to be aware of differences in anatomy.

Homograft Aortic Root Replacement for Destructive Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Results in the Current Era.

Background: Destructive aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis portends a high morbidity and mortality, and requires complex high-risk surgery. Homograft root replacement is the most radical and biocompatible operation and, thus, the preferred option. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 61 consecutive patients who underwent a cardiac reoperation comprising homograft aortic root replacement since 2010. The probabilities of survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, whereas multivariable regression served to outline the predictors of adverse events. The endpoints were operative/late death, perioperative low cardiac output and renal failure, and reoperations. Results: The operative (cumulative hospital and 30-day) mortality was 13%. The baseline aspartate transaminase (AST) and associated mitral procedures were predictive of operative death (p = 0.048, OR [95% CIs] = 1.03 [1-1.06]) and perioperative low cardiac output, respectively (p = 0.04, OR [95% CIs] = 21.3 [2.7-168.9] for valve replacement). The latter occurred in 12 (20%) patients, despite a normal ejection fraction. Survival estimates (±SE) at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery were 86.3 ± 4.7%, 82.0 ± 4.9%, 75.2 ± 5.6, and 70.0 ± 6.3%, respectively. Survival was significantly lower in the case of AST ≥ 40 IU/L (p = 0.04) and aortic cross-clamp time ≥ 180 min (p = 0.01), but not when excluding operative survivors. Five patients required early (two out of the five, within 3 months) or late (three out of the five) reoperation. Conclusions: Homograft aortic root replacement for destructive prosthetic valve endocarditis can currently be performed with a near 90% operative survival and reasonable 3-year mortality and reoperation rate. AST might serve to additionally stratify the operative risk.

Management of a pregnant woman with Marfan syndrome and aortic root and aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm: a case report.

Background: Marfan syndrome is a genetic connective tissue disorder that commonly affects the cardiovascular, skeletal, and ocular system. The increased risk of developing thoracic aortic aneurysms that can lead to aortic dissection and rupture is the main source of mortality in these patients. Pregnancy-induced changes can further increase the risk for aortic complications, especially in patients with an aortic root diameter > 45 mm. Case summary: The case of a 26-year-old female with Marfan syndrome who was lost to follow-up for five years and presented to our department being pregnant at 21 weeks is presented. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) showed an aortic root diameter of 55 mm and a large aneurysm of an aberrant right subclavian artery. Following multidisciplinary team discussion, valve-sparing aortic root and ascending aortic replacement was performed at 22 weeks of gestation without any complications. During the remaining pregnancy, the patient had frequent clinical and CMR follow-up investigations showing a mild increased size of the subclavian aneurysm. Uncomplicated caesarean delivery was performed at 35 weeks of gestation, and the subclavian artery aneurysm was successfully treated by interventional embolization. Discussion: Although cardiovascular surgery in our patient during pregnancy was uncomplicated, the case illustrates that pre-pregnancy counselling in Marfan patients is recommended to reduce the risk for mother and child.

Learning three-dimensional aortic root assessment based on sparse annotations.

Purpose: Analyzing the anatomy of the aorta and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) is crucial for risk assessment and planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A comprehensive analysis of the aortic root and LVOT requires the extraction of the patient-individual anatomy via segmentation. Deep learning has shown good performance on various segmentation tasks. If this is formulated as a supervised problem, large amounts of annotated data are required for training. Therefore, minimizing the annotation complexity is desirable. Approach: We propose two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional annotation and point cloud-based surface reconstruction to train a fully automatic 3D segmentation network for the aortic root and the LVOT. Our sparse annotation scheme enables easy and fast training data generation for tubular structures such as the aortic root. From the segmentation results, we derive clinically relevant parameters for TAVI planning. Results: The proposed 2D cross-sectional annotation results in high inter-observer agreement [Dice similarity coefficient (DSC): 0.94]. The segmentation model achieves a DSC of 0.90 and an average surface distance of 0.96 mm. Our approach achieves an aortic annulus maximum diameter difference between prediction and annotation of 0.45 mm (inter-observer variance: 0.25 mm). Conclusions: The presented approach facilitates reproducible annotations. The annotations allow for training accurate segmentation models of the aortic root and LVOT. The segmentation results facilitate reproducible and quantifiable measurements for TAVI planning.

The aortic root, do we see the 'hole' picture?

The aortic root is the segment of the aorta between the left ventricular outflow tract and the sinotubular junction of the ascending aorta, and, on one level, is merely a tube, with a valve at its base, dynamic structures below it, and notable for having the life-limiting coronary arteries originate within its sinuses. However, we propose that the perception of the aortic root has been historically grossly over-simplified by virtue of a bias towards its internal aspect, in terms of coronary ostia and subvalvar relationships through the fibrous skeleton and in so-doing a myocardial component on the external aspect has all but been ignored. This myocardial mass, a component of the left ventricular free wall, is sometimes termed the 'left ostial process' but appears to be rarely, if ever, considered by anatomists, cardiologists, and surgeons alike. By virtue of its direct continuity to the aortic root and proximal left coronary artery, it may have unique roles and, at the very least, deserves greater recognition and investigation. Herein, we propose that it could play a crucial role in cardiac embryology including coronary dominance, and may afford a physiological advantage, to the extent that it may have been selected for in evolutionary terms.

Aortic Root Thromboembolism and Associated Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Contemporary Durable LVADs.

Patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices may develop aortic root thrombus, yet its prevalence and associated risks are unknown. We present 2 patients who developed aortic root thromboembolism and acute coronary occlusions. We additionally present heart transplantation as viable treatment for thromboembolic disease and refractory right ventricular failure.

Complete Aortic Valve Reconstruction with Autologous Pericardium: Analysis of Mid-Term Results of Single-Center Experience with AVNeo Procedure.

PURPOSE: Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) is a relatively recent advancement in surgical AV replacement. Data on its performance beyond the short term are limited. We assessed the mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing AVNeo, focusing on feasibility, perioperative details, and its role in AV pathology treatment. METHODS: Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent AVNeo between December 2016 and February 2018. Clinical data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Tricuspid reconstruction with autologous pericardium was performed in all cases. Echocardiographic follow-up was conducted post-discharge, at 6 and 12 months, and annually thereafter. RESULTS: The mean age was 62.6 ± 18.7 years. AVNeo was feasible in all cases. Concomitant procedures were performed in 43 (66.2%) patients. Mean bypass and cross-clamp times were 119.2 ± 30.3 and 87.1 ± 22.9 minutes, respectively. Postoperative transvalvular hemodynamics was excellent. There was one (1.5%) in-hospital death. Follow-up (mean 66.72 ± 12.77 months) was complete in 58 patients (89.2%). There were no detected valve-related or thromboembolic events. Transvalvular hemodynamic parameters were stable during the observation period: peak pressure gradient at discharge and follow-up was 15.3 ± 4.6 mmHg and 15.01 ± 6.3 mmHg, respectively (ρ = 0.346). CONCLUSIONS: AVNeo demonstrated the feasibility and favorable mid-term outcomes. Studies with longer-term observation are warranted to evaluate its durability.

Decellularized aortic homografts versus mechanical composite grafts for aortic root replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Mechanical composite valve grafts (MCVGs) are the first-line therapy for aortic root replacement in young adults. Decellularized aortic homografts (DAH) present a promising novel alternative due to their lower thrombogenicity. We aimed to compare both treatment options regarding survival and valve-related adverse events. METHODS: This study was designed as a single-centre retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent root replacement with MCVG or DAH between 2000 and 2022. Urgent or emergent procedures were excluded. RESULTS: The study cohort included 289 patients (MCVG n = 216, DAH n = 73) with a mean age of 48.5 ± 12 years (MCVG 49 ± 12 years vs DAH 47 ± 11 years; P = 0.23) and a median EuroScore II of 1.7% (1.2, 2.6). The 30-day mortality was 1% (n = 3). Cumulative survival at 3 years was 99% for DAH and 94% for MCVG, respectively (P = 0.15). Mean follow-up was 98.9 ± 72.7 months. Bleeding events (n = 14, 6.5%) and thromboembolism (n = 14, 6.5%) were only observed in the MCVG group (P = 0.19 and 0.09, respectively). Four cases (5%) of moderate structural valve deterioration occurred, all in the DAH group (P ≤ 0.001). The cumulative incidence of a composite end point of valve-related adverse events was significantly higher in the MCVG group (P = 0.0295). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root replacement with MCVGs and decellularized aortic homografts showed low mortality in an elective setting. Patients in the homograft cohort demonstrated significantly higher freedom from valve-related adverse events. DAH present a promising treatment option for young patients requiring root replacement; however, data on long-term durability are needed.

Nature of aortic annulus: Influence of annulus dynamic on the aortic valve hemodynamics.

Accurate imaging reports of the aortic valve indicate that the diameter of the aortic annulus changes regularly during a cardiac cycle. Most of these studies aim to demonstrate the proper method for estimating the aortic annulus diameter before performing TAVR surgery, revealing that the aortic annulus is dynamic and not constant throughout the cardiac cycle. This raises the question of how fixing the aortic annulus might affect valve function, which is a question that still needs to be addressed. Therefore, the present study seeks to address this question and elucidate the dynamic impact of the aortic annulus on aortic valve hemodynamics. Two computational models based on this hypothesis were created and solved, and then their results were compared. Both models are identical, except for the intrinsic dynamic nature of the aortic annulus. One model consists of the dynamic behavior, and the other simulates a fixed annulus, resembling the effect of a TAVR operation, SAVR, or any phenomenon that eliminates the dynamic nature of the annulus. Our research findings indicate that the dynamic nature of the annulus enhances blood flow (+2.7 %), increases mean velocity (+11.9) and kinetic energy density (+34 %), prolongs momentum retention during systole, stabilizes the flow jet at the end of systole, reduces the required pressure to keep the leaflets open (-40.9 % at 0.3s), and sustains ventricular pressure superiority (+9.4 %) over the aorta for a longer duration (+17.7 % of systole), a crucial factor in preventing backflow during aortic valve closure. Based on these results, more attention should be paid to the dynamic nature of the annulus.

Impact of valve-sparing aortic root replacement on aortic fluid dynamics and biomechanics in patients with syndromic heritable thoracic aortic disease.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with syndromic heritable thoracic aortic diseases (sHTAD) who underwent prophylactic aortic root replacement are at high risk of distal aortic events, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. This prospective, longitudinal study aims to assess the impact of valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) on aortic fluid dynamics and biomechanics in these patients, and to examine whether they present altered haemodynamics or biomechanics prior to surgery compared to sHTAD patients with no indication for surgery (sHTAD-NSx) and healthy volunteers (HV). METHODS: Sixteen patients with Marfan or Loeys-Dietz syndrome underwent two 4D flow CMR studies before (sHTAD-preSx) and after VSARR (sHTAD-postSx). Two age, sex and BSA matched cohorts of 40 HV and 16 sHTAD-NSx patients with available 4D flow CMR, were selected for comparison. In-plane rotational flow (IRF), systolic flow reversal ratio (SFRR), wall shear stress (WSS), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and aortic strain were analysed in the ascending (AscAo) and descending aorta (DescAo). RESULTS: All patients with sHTAD presented altered haemodynamics and increased aortic stiffness (p<0.05) compared to HV, both in the AscAo (median PWV 7.4 in sHTAD-NSx; 6.8 in sHTAD-preSx; 4.9m/s in HV) and DescAo (median PWV 9.1 in sHTAD-NSx; 8.1 in sHTAD-preSx; 6.3m/s in HV). Patients awaiting VSARR had markedly reduced in-plane (median IRF -2.2 vs 10.4 cm2/s in HV, p=0.001), but increased through-plane flow rotation (median SFRR 7.8 vs 3.8% in HV, p=0.002), and decreased WSS (0.36 vs 0.47N/m2 in HV, p=0.004) in the proximal DescAo. After VSARR, proximal DescAo in-plane rotational flow (p=0.010) and circumferential WSS increased (p=0.011), no longer differing from HV, but through-plane rotational flow, axial WSS and stiffness remained altered. Patients in which aortic tortuosity was reduced after surgery showed greater post-surgical increase in IRF compared to those in which tortuosity increased (median IRF increase 18.1 vs 3.3cm²/s, p=0.047). Most AscAo flow alterations were restored to physiological values after VSARR. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sHTAD, VSARR partially restores downstream fluid dynamics to physiological levels. However, some flow disturbances and increased stiffness persist in the proximal DescAo. Further longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate whether persistent alterations contribute to post-surgical risk.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of the Bentall procedure between patients with and without Marfan syndrome.

The Bentall procedure, using a composite valve graft, has become one of the standard therapies for aortic root disease. Patients with Marfan syndrome are prone to aortic annular dilatation and dissection and often undergo aortic root replacement, including the Bentall procedure. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of the Bentall procedure between Japanese patients with and without Marfan syndrome. Data from 294 patients who underwent the Bentall procedure over 37 years were retrospectively analyzed. The study compared the data of patients with Marfan syndrome (n = 94) and those without it (n = 200). Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with early mortality, late mortality, reoperation, and aortic root reoperation. The early mortality rate was 4.1%, with no significant difference between patients with and without Marfan syndrome. The long-term survival rates at 10, 20, and 30 years were 81.0%, 66.5%, and 49.1%, respectively, with no significant between-group differences. Aortic reoperations were more frequent in patients with Marfan syndrome; however, the number did not differ significantly between the groups. Risk factors for late mortality included diabetes and coronary reimplantation with an inclusion technique. Aortic dissection, Marfan syndrome, and smoking were risk factors for aortic reoperation. Late mortality after the Bentall procedure was comparable between Japanese patients with and without Marfan syndrome although aortic reoperation was significantly frequent in patients with Marfan syndrome. Continuous monitoring and management, including the prevention of aortic dissection and dilation of residual aorta, are crucial for patients with Marfan syndrome undergoing the Bentall procedure.

The proximal extension of acute type A aortic dissection is associated with ascending aortic wall degeneration.

Background: Aortic root involvement during acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) may depend on ascending aortic wall degeneration. Surgical decision-making for extended resection of the aortic root is clinically made without histopathology. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the degree of degeneration of the ascending aortic wall found in patients with ATAAD is associated with the aortic root involvement. Methods: Collectively, 141 consecutive patients undergoing ATAAD surgery at Tampere University Heart Hospital were investigated. The ascending aortic wall resected in surgery was processed for 11 different variables that describe medial and adventitial degeneration. In addition, atherosclerosis and inflammation were separately evaluated. Patients undergoing aortic root replacement were compared with those with supracoronary reconstruction of the ascending aorta with/without aortic valve surgery (root-sparing surgery) during a mean 4.9-year follow-up. Results: Aortic root replacement together with the ascending aortic replacement was performed in 39% of the patients (n=55). The mean age for all patients was 65 years [standard deviation (SD 13)]. Many patients with aortic root replacement had moderate to severe aortic valve regurgitation (85.5%). Most of the patients with aortic root-sparing surgery included a supracoronary tube prosthesis (89.5%), while nine patients also had aortic valve replacement. The degree of mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation was more prominent in patients with aortic root replacement compared to patients with root-sparing surgery (2.1 SD 0.4 vs. 1.9 SD 0.4, P=0.04, respectively). During follow-up, there were 52 deaths among patients (log rank P=0.79). Conclusions: Histopathology of the ascending aorta during ATAAD reveals distinctive aortic wall degeneration in patients with aortic root involvement vs. not. The degree of mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation assessed postoperatively is associated with the choice of surgical procedure in many patients.

Impact of the Aortomitral Positional Anatomy on Atrioventricular Conduction Disorder Following Mitral Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Variations in the aortomitral positional anatomy, including aortic root rotation appear to be related to variations in the location of the conduction system, including the bundle of His. However, little is known about their clinical significance. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 147 patients with normal ECGs who underwent mitral valve surgery. The aortomitral anatomy was classified using preoperative 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, and postoperative conduction disorders, including atrioventricular block and bundle branch block, were analyzed. Variations classified as aortomitral appearance were designated as having a center appearance (85.7%, n=126/147) or lateral appearance (14.3%, n=21/147) on the basis of whether the aortic root was located at the center or was shifted to the left fibrous trigone side. Subsequently, those with a center appearance, aortic root rotation was classified as having a center rotation (83.3% [n=105/126]), in which the commissure of the left and noncoronary aortic leaflet was located at the center, lateral rotation (14.3% [n=18/126]), rotated to the left trigone side, or medial rotation (2.4% [n=3/126]), rotated to the right. The incidence of 3-month persistent new-onset conduction disorder was higher in the lateral appearance than the center appearance group (21.1% versus 5.0%; P=0.031) and higher in the lateral rotation than in the center or medial rotation groups (29.4% versus 1.0% versus 0.0%, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Aortomitral variations can be classified using 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Lateral appearance and lateral rotation are risk factors for conduction disorders in mitral valve surgery.

Reoperative aortic root surgery: single-center long-term outcomes and literature review.

Background and Objective: Reoperative aortic root surgery has become more and more common over the years and is considered high-risk, with significantly worse outcomes compared to first-procedure root surgery. At our institution, this kind of surgery is frequently performed. The aim of the present review is to describe currently available literature on reoperative surgery on the aortic root in terms of patients' population, indications for surgery and outcomes and to present our center's experience on the matter. Methods: A literature review was performed in order to identify pertinent studies. They were then compared and described. We also described preoperative characteristics, operative strategies and outcomes of all the patients who underwent redo aortic root surgery from January 1986 to December 2022 at our center. Key Content and Findings: Our literature review identified 12 pertinent studies, with a total of 16,627 considered patients. The most frequent indications for redo surgery were endocarditis (35.5%), aneurysm, dissection and pseudoaneurysm. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times were 218 and 152 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12%. When analyzing our center's data, 344 procedures were identified. Aortic root dilation was the most frequent indication (36.9%). Mean CPB and cross-clamp times were 218.0±78.8 and 158.2±49.7 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 9.6%. Survival at 5 and 15 years was 76.1% and 51.4% respectively. Freedom from further aortic reintervention was 88.1% after 5 years and 64.9% after 15 years. Conclusions: Reoperative aortic root surgery is a difficult cardiac procedure which is linked to significantly higher mortality than first-time root replacement. If it is performed by experienced surgeons with a careful preoperative planning its result can still be satisfactory. Our results showed acceptable rates of mortality and reinterventions at follow-up. Endocarditis, however, was linked to worse outcomes.

Echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial volume and comparative analysis to left atrial to aortic root ratio in premature neonates and infants with patent ductus arteriosus.

PURPOSE: Left atrium to aortic root ratio (LA/Ao) is an echocardiographic marker of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Since 2-dimensional measurement of the ratio is geometrically limited, left atrial volume (LAV) which has 3-dimensional characteristics was investigated. The aim of this study was to determine a correlation between LA/Ao ratio and LAV as well as holodiastolic flow reversal in preterm neonates with and without a PDA. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of neonates with and without PDA was performed. Targeted neonatal echocardiography evaluation of LA/Ao and LAV was measured from parasternal long-axis view and the apical 4 and 2-chamber views, respectively. Univariate and linear regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: 200 patients were included of whom 158 (79.0%) had a PDA shunt. The median gestational age at the time of echo was 27.4 weeks (IQR: 25.7-29.4 weeks). The median LA/Ao ratio was 1.51 (IQR: 1.26-1.83) and median LAV indexed to weight was  .91 mL/kg (IQR: .65-1.18 mL/kg). There was a significant correlation between LA/Ao and LAV indexed to weight in the PDA group (r2 = .080, p = .0003). LA/Ao ratio and LAV indexed to weight differed significantly between those with diastolic flow reversal versus no-flow reversal (LA/Ao, p = .003; LAV, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a significant correlation between LA/Ao and LAV in preterm infants with PDA, with greater magnitude of discordance for LAV. The power of LAV versus LA/Ao in monitoring hemodynamically significant PDA requires prospective evaluation.

Echocardiographic Features of an Evolving Periaortic Valvular Abscess in a Patient with Staphylococcus Epidermidis Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis is a serious complication following valve replacement surgery, with the development of aortic root abscess being a catastrophic manifestation. We present a case of a 71-year-old female with a bioprosthetic aortic valve who presented with shortness of breath. Echocardiographic findings revealed vegetation on the prosthetic aortic valve with a periaortic, annular abscess. Given the patient's comorbidities and high surgical risk, conservative management with antibiotics was chosen. The patient responded well to antibiotic therapy and was discharged with long-term antibiotic treatment. Prosthetic valve endocarditis, particularly with periaortic abscess formation, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and appropriate management are crucial for improving outcomes.

Four-dimensional analysis of aortic root motion in normal population using retrospective multiphase computed tomography.

Aims: Aortic root motion is suspected to contribute to proximal aortic dissection. While motion of the aorta in four dimensions can be traced with real-time imaging, displacement and rotation in quantitative terms remain unknown. The hypothesis was to show feasibility of quantification of three-dimensional aortic root motion from dynamic CT imaging. Methods and results: Dynamic CT images of 40 patients for coronary assessment were acquired using a dynamic protocol. Scans were ECG-triggered and segmented in 10 time-stepped phases (0-90%) per cardiac cycle. With identification of the sinotubular junction (STJ), a patient-specific co-ordinate system was created with the z-axis (out-of-plane) parallel to longitudinal direction. The left and right coronary ostia were traced at each time-step to quantify downward motion in reference to the STJ plane, motion within the STJ plane (in-plane), and the degree of rotation. Enrolled individuals had an age of 65 ± 12, and 14 were male (35%). The out-of-plane motion was recorded with the largest displacement of 10.26 ± 2.20 and 8.67 ± 1.69 mm referenced by left and right coronary ostia, respectively. The mean downward movement of aortic root was 9.13 ± 1.86 mm. The largest in-plane motion was recorded at 9.17 ± 2.33 mm and 6.51 ± 1.75 mm referenced by left and right coronary ostia, respectively. The largest STJ in-plane motion was 7.37 ± 1.96 mm, and rotation of the aortic root was 11.8 ± 4.60°. Conclusion: In vivo spatial and temporal displacement of the aortic root can be identified and quantified from multiphase ECG-gated contrast-enhanced CT images. Knowledge of normal 4D motion of the aortic root may help understand its biomechanical impact in patients with aortopathy and pre- and post-surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Comprehensive imaging evaluation of the aortic valve and root before aortic root surgery: a study comparing MDCT and TEE.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy and consistency of MDCT and TEE in the preoperative assessment of aortic root surgery. METHODS: From January 2021 to September 2022, 118 patients who underwent aortic root surgery were included in this study. All patients underwent high-quality preoperative MDCT and TEE examinations, and the examination results were independently measured and assessed by two senior radiologists or ultrasound specialists. Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson correlation testing were employed to assess the correlation and consistency between MDCT and TEE. These analyses were then compared with actual intraoperative measurement data. RESULTS: Among all the patients, 73 (61.86%) had tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), and 45 (38.14%) had bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). A comparison between the TEE and MDCT measurements showed that for the annulus diameter, the area-derived diameter had the best correlation and agreement. For the sinus of Valsalva diameter, the circumference-derived diameter was optimal. However, for the STJ diameter, the minimum cross-sectional diameter showed the best agreement with TEE. In contrast, measurements of geometric height showed a weaker correlation and agreement. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MDCT can be a valuable tool for perioperative evaluation in aortic root surgery, with good correlation, consistency, and feasibility when compared to TEE. The choice of MDCT measurement methodology, specifically area-derived and circumference-derived diameter, proved to be more accurate than other methods. Further research is required to enhance the understanding of aortic valve repair and associated imaging techniques.