Power Has Pitfalls: (In)accuracy of Administrative Data for Nonoperative Management of Appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis is increasingly common. Effectiveness of NOM has been studied by identifying patients via International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and no code for appendectomy. We sought to assess the accuracy of such administrative definitions. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for appendicitis at five sites across the United States. Initial management plan and clinical severity were recorded by trained abstractors. We identified a gold standard cohort of patients with surgeon-diagnosed uncomplicated appendicitis and planned NOM. We defined two administrative cohorts with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and either no surgery during initial admission (definition #1) or no surgery on day 0-1 of admission (definition #2). We compared each definition to the gold standard. RESULTS: Among 1224 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 72 (5.9%) underwent planned NOM. NOM patients were older (median [Q1-Q3] of 37 [27-56] versus 32 [25-44] y) and less frequently male (51.4% versus 54.9%), White (54.1% versus 67.6%), and privately insured (38.9% versus 50.2%) than patients managed operatively. Definition #1 had sensitivity of 0.81 and positive predictive value of 0.87 for NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. Definition #2 had sensitivity of 0.83 and positive predictive value of 0.72. The gold standard cohort had a true failure/recurrence rate of 23.6%, compared with apparent rates of 25.4% and 39.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative definitions are prone to misclassification in identifying planned NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. This likely impacts outcomes in studies using administrative databases. Investigators should disclose how misclassification may affect results and select an administrative definition that optimally balances sensitivity and specificity for their research question.

Daytime versus nighttime appendectomy in term of complications and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical conditions globally. However, the association between nighttime appendectomy and patients' morbidity and mortality is unclear. This study aims to compare outcomes following nighttime versus daytime appendectomy. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to March 26, 2024 (updated on July 1, 2024) were searched. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, reoperation, readmission, conversion to laparotomy, hospital stay and operation time. Mean difference (MD) or odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Fifteen studies totaling 33,596 patients were included. There were no differences between nighttime and daytime appendectomy for rates of overall postoperative complications (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87, 1.00, 14 studies), mortality (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.37, 7.88, 7 studies), intraoperative complications (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08, 9.86; 2 studies), reoperation (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.06, 2.55; 3 studies) and readmission (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65, 1.13; I2 = 0%, 5 studies). However, the conversion to laparotomy risks (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12, 3.29; 6 studies) among patients who underwent appendectomy during nighttime was significantly elevated compared to daytime. CONCLUSIONS: There was no increased risk or difference in postoperative mortality and complication rates associated with nighttime compared with daytime appendectomy. However, future studies should assess the reasons for higher conversion rates during the night.

Evaluation of Limited English Proficiency in the Management and Outcomes of Appendicitis in Children.

INTRODUCTION: Appendectomies are one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures. Limited English proficiency (LEP) may lead to disparities in health outcomes between English-proficient and LEP patients. This study assesses the association between LEP and postoperative outcomes in pediatric appendectomy. METHODS: We analyzed records from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database from 2010 to 2023 under 18 y of age undergoing appendectomy at our institution. LEP was defined as the need for an interpreter. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative emergency department (ED) visits within 30 d of discharge. Multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred forty three children with appendicitis were identified, with 208 (18.2%) LEP and 935 (81.8%) English-proficient patients. LEP children were more likely to present with complicated appendicitis (42.8% versus 25.5%, P < 0.0001) and sepsis (34.1% versus 21.6%, P = 0.0003). LEP patients experience more serious (8.6% versus 3.9%, P = 0.02), overall complications (10.1% versus 5.5%, P = 0.006), and organ/surgical space site infections (8.2% versus 3.3%, P = 0.003). On multivariable analysis controlling for ethnicity and factors associated with complicated presentation, LEP was associated with increased postoperative ED visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.40-4.39), but not LOS (aOR 1.86, 95% CI = 0.87-3.97) or complications (aOR 1.76, 95% CI = 0.79-4.00). CONCLUSIONS: LEP is independently associated with increased postoperative ED visits. Higher rates of complications and longer LOS may be related to increased complicated appendicitis at presentation. The role of cultural preferences and other social determinants of health that contribute to these disparities needs more investigation.

Appendectomy and appendicitis do not increase colorectal cancer risk: evidence from Mendelian randomization.

Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most prevalent acute abdominal diseases and appendectomy is the definitive treatment of appendicitis. However, whether appendicitis and appendectomy cause colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. The results of observational studies are contradictory, but randomized controlled trials (RCT) cannot be conducted. Methods: Data of appendectomy, AA, and CRC were obtained from the IEU Open GWAS project. We selected several Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics for CRC: statistics for colon cancer (CC) were obtained from MRC-IEU and Neale lab, respectively; statistics for rectum cancer (RC) were obtained from MRC-IEU and FinnGen, respectively; statistics for CRC were provided by Sakaue S et al. Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to evaluate the causal relationships between exposure and outcomes. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was the most important analysis method. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the results of IVW to increase the reliability and sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results: According to the results of IVW, appendectomy did not increase risk of CC: MRC-IEU (OR:1.009, 95%CI:0.984-1.035, P=0.494), Neale lab (OR:1.016, 95%CI:0.993-1.040, P=0.174); Appendectomy also did not increase risk of RC: MRC-IEU(OR:0.994, 95%CI:0.974-1.014, P=0.538), FinnGen(OR:2.791, 95%CI:0.013-580.763, P=0.706); Appendectomy also did not increase risk of CRC: Sakaue S(OR:1.382, 95%CI:0.301-6.352, P=0.678). Appendicitis did not increase risk of CC: MRC-IEU(OR:1.000, 95%CI:0.999-1.001, P=0.641), Neale lab(OR:1.000, 95%CI:1.000-1.001, P=0.319); Appendicitis also did not increase risk of RC: MRC-IEU(OR:1.000, 95%CI:0.999-1.000, P=0.361), FinnGen(OR:0.903, 95%CI:0.737-1.105, P=0.321); Appendicitis also did not increase risk of CRC: Sakaue S (OR:1.018, 95%CI:0.950-1.091, P=0.609). The results of Meta-analysis also showed appendectomy (P=0.459) and appendicitis (P=0.999) did not increase the risk of CRC. Conclusions: Appendectomy and appendicitis do not increase the risk of colorectal cancer. More clinical trials are needed in the future to verify the causal relationships.

Endometriosis of the appendix: prevalence, associated lesions, and proposal of pathogenetic hypotheses. A retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of endometriosis of the appendix and the association with other pelvic localizations of the disease and to provide pathogenesis hypotheses. METHODS: Monocentric, observational, retrospective, cohort study. Patients undergoing laparoscopic endometriosis surgery in our tertiary referral center were consecutively enrolled. The prevalence of the different localizations of pelvic endometriosis including appendix involvement detected during surgery was collected. Included patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of appendiceal endometriosis. Women with a history of appendectomy were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four hundred-sixty patients were included for data analysis. The prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis was 2.8%. In patients affected by endometriosis of the appendix, concomitant ovarian and/or bladder endometriosis were more frequently encountered, with prevalence of 53.9% (vs 21.0% in non-appendiceal endometriosis group, p = 0.005) and 38.4% (vs 11.4%, p = 0.003), respectively. Isolated ovarian endometriosis was significantly associated to appendiceal disease compared to isolated uterosacral ligament (USL) endometriosis or USL and ovarian endometriosis combined (46.2% vs 15.4% vs 7.7%, p < 0.001). Poisson regression analysis revealed a 4.1-fold and 4.4-fold higher risk of ovarian and bladder endometriosis, respectively, and a 0.1-fold risk of concomitant USL endometriosis in patients with appendiceal involvement. CONCLUSION: Involvement of the appendix is not uncommon among patients undergoing endometriosis surgery. Significant association was detected between appendiceal, ovarian, and bladder endometriosis that may be explained by disease dissemination coming from endometrioma fluid shedding. Given the prevalence of appendiceal involvement, counseling regarding the potential need for appendectomy during endometriosis surgery should be considered.

Feasibility of a novel unassisted single-channel transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of appendiceal lesions (with video).

BACKGROUND: Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) is rapidly evolving and has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative to appendectomy. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and safety of a novel unassisted single-channel TEA. METHOD: We retrospectively investigated 23 patients with appendicitis or appendiceal lesions who underwent TEA from February 2016 to December 2022. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedure­related parameters, and follow­up data and analyzed the impact of previous abdominal surgery and traction technique. RESULTS: The mean age was 56.0 years. Of the 23 patients with appendiceal lesions, fourteen patients underwent TEA and nine underwent traction-assisted TEA (T-TEA). Eight patients (34.8%) had previous abdominal surgery. The En bloc resection rate was 95.7%. The mean procedure duration was 91.1 ± 45.5 min, and the mean wound closure time was 29.4 ± 18.6 min. The wounds after endoscopic appendectomy were closed with clips (21.7%) or a combination of clip closure and endoloop reinforcement (78.3%), and the median number of clips was 7 (range, 3-15). Three patients (13.0%) experienced major adverse events, including two delayed perforations (laparoscopic surgery) and one infection (salvage endoscopic suture). During a median follow-up of 23 months, no residual or recurrent lesions were observed, and no recurrence of abdominal pain occurred. There were no significant differences between TEA and T-TEA groups and between patients with and without abdominal surgery groups in each factor. CONCLUSION: Unassisted single-channel TEA for patients with appendiceal lesions has favorable short- and long-term outcomes. TEA can safely and effectively treat appendiceal disease in appropriately selected cases.

Exploring the causality of appendectomy and ischaemic heart disease: a Mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis.

Background: The risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is increased in appendectomy patients, but it is not clear whether there is a causal relationship. We aimed to systematically estimate the causal relationship between appendectomy and IHD and its subtypes, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and angina pectoris (AP), using Mendelian randomization (MR) study methods and meta-analysis. Methods: As the discovery cohort analysis, we extracted independent genetic variants strongly associated with appendectomy from the FinnGen study (28,601 cases) as instrumental variables (IVs). Genome-wide association study (GWAS) from UK Biobank were selected for outcome data. A first two-sample MR analysis was then conducted. As the replication cohort, IVs associated with appendectomy were extracted in the UK Biobank (50,105 cases). GWAS from the FinnGen study were selected for outcome data. A second MR analysis was then performed. Finally, meta-analyses were applied to assess the combined causal effects of the MR results. Results: In the discovery cohort, there was a significant positive causal relationship between appendectomy and IHD and its subtypes AMI and AP. The replication cohort only found a positive causal relationship between appendectomy and AMI. Meta-analysis showed a positive causal relationship between appendectomy and IHD (OR: 1.128, 95% CI: 1.067-1.193, P = 2.459e-05), AMI (OR: 1.195, 95% CI: 1.095-1.305, P = 6.898e-05), and AP (OR: 1.087, 95% CI: 1.016-1.164, P = 1.598e-02). Conclusions: This comprehensive MR analysis suggests that genetically predicted appendectomy may be a risk factor for the development of IHD and its subtypes AMI and AP. We need to continue to pay attention to these links.

Apendicectomía en pacientes con situs inversus: Serie de tres casos con manejo laparoscópico / Appendectomy in patients with situs inversus: Three cases series with laparoscopic approach

Introducción. La transposición de los órganos debido al situs inversus (SI) es una rara afección que dificulta el diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda. Esta condición hace que la sintomatología del paciente y los hallazgos al examen físico puedan ser atípicos, lo que demanda el uso de imágenes para la confirmación diagnóstica en la mayoría de los casos. Métodos. Se describieron tres casos de apendicitis en pacientes con diagnóstico de situs inversus. Dos de ellos tenían el antecedente conocido, mientras el tercer caso fue diagnosticado de forma intraoperatoria. Resultados. En dos pacientes se decidió llevar a cirugía vía laparoscópica sin imágenes diagnósticas adicionales. Los pacientes evolucionaron de manera satisfactoria. Conclusión. Siempre se debe considerar la apendicitis dentro de los diagnósticos diferenciales en los pacientes con dolor en fosa ilíaca izquierda. Es fundamental diagnosticar y tratar la apendicitis de manera efectiva para minimizar las complicaciones asociadas. La importancia de la anamnesis y la sospecha clínica del examinador son vitales en estos casos, que se pueden confirmar con las imágenes diagnósticas. Pueden existir casos en donde la condición clínica del paciente no permita la realización de estudios diagnósticos por imágenes; esto apoya cada vez más el uso del abordaje laparoscópico. Se recomienda considerar el abordaje laparoscópico en primera instancia, ya que nos permite la confirmación diagnóstica de situs inversus totalis en caso de que el antecedente sea desconocido y facilita el manejo oportuno de la urgencia.

Introduction. Organ transposition due to situs inversus (SI) is a rare condition that makes the diagnosis of acute appendicitis difficult. This condition entails that the patient' symptoms and physical examination findings may be atypical, which requires the use of images for diagnostic confirmation in most cases. Clinical cases. Three cases of appendicitis in patients diagnosed with situs inversus are described. Two of them had a known medical history, while the third case was diagnosed intraoperatively. Results. In two patients it was decided to undergo laparoscopic surgery without additional diagnostic images. The patients progressed satisfactorily. Conclusion. Appendicitis should always be considered in the differential diagnoses in patients with pain in the left iliac fossa. It is essential to diagnose and treat appendicitis effectively to minimize associated complications. The importance of the anamnesis and the examiner's clinical suspicion are vital in these cases, which can be confirmed with diagnostic images. There may be cases where the patient's clinical condition does not allow diagnostic imaging studies to be performed, increasingly supports the use of the laparoscopic approach. It is recommended to consider the laparoscopic approach in the first instance, since it allows us to confirm the diagnosis of situs inversus totalisin case the history is unknown and facilitates timely management of the emergency.

Can Physicians Delay Appendectomy for One Night in Children With Acute Appendicitis?

Background: In pediatrics, appendicitis is the leading cause of emergency surgery. It was previously believed that postponing the surgery could lead to the appendix rupture. Children with this condition can be difficult to diagnose. The evidence regarding the necessity of an immediate appendectomy is a topic of debate. In this study, we evaluated the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis to determine whether postponing appendectomy for one night is safe or not. Methods: This study involved 534 individuals diagnosed with acute appendicitis, who were separated into two groups: those who underwent an appendectomy immediately (within 8 hours) and those who had a delayed procedure (between 8-18 hours). We recorded and compared demographic data, symptoms, laboratory results, time of symptoms, hospitalization duration, surgery duration, overall time, length of stay after surgery, and any other complications that occurred between the two groups. Results: The rate of surgical site infection (SSI) did not differ significantly between the groups (2.8% vs 4.2%, P=0.74). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the risk of perforation between the time of surgery in our study (21.9% vs 19.8%, P>0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that there is no increased risk of complications such as perforation when appendectomy is delayed for up to 18 hours.

Risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma after an appendectomy: results from three large prospective cohort studies and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The relationship between appendectomy and subsequent colorectal cancer risk remains unclear, and no study has examined its association with colorectal adenoma. METHODS: We used data from three prospective cohorts: Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses' Health Study (NHS), and NHSII. Appendectomy history was self-reported at baseline. Colorectal cancer risk was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models among 224,109 participants followed up to 32 years. Colorectal adenoma risk was evaluated among 157,490 participants with at least one lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during follow-up with logistic regression models accounting for repeated observations. We also performed a meta-analysis of cohort studies that examined association between appendectomy and colorectal cancer risk. RESULTS: We documented 3,384 colorectal cancers, 13,006 conventional adenomas, and 11,519 serrated polyps during the follow-up period. Compared to participants without appendectomy, those who reported appendectomy history were not at higher risk of colorectal (HR [95% CI], 0.92 [0.84-1.00]), colon (0.92 [0.83-1.01]), or rectal (0.85 [0.70-1.03]) cancer. Similarly, appendectomy history was not associated with higher risk of conventional adenoma (OR [95% CI], 1.00 [0.97-1.02]), serrated polyp (0.97 [0.94-1.00]), or high-risk adenoma (0.96 [0.92-1.01]). The meta-analysis showed appendectomy was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer within a short time after the procedure (1.68 [1.01-2.81]), while the long-term risk was slightly inverse (0.94 [0.90-0.97]). CONCLUSION: We found no evidence of an association between appendectomy history and long-term risk of colorectal cancer or its precursors. The observed higher risk of colorectal cancer right after appendectomy in the first few years is likely due to reverse causation.

Interaction between alimentary surgery and risk of dementia: a nationwide population-based case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Based on current research, it is known that the gastrointestinal tract microbiota and its genome play a crucial role in mental illnesses. Studies indicate a direct correlation between gastrointestinal tract microbiota and the onset of dementia, mediated by metabolic diseases and low-grade inflammation. The association between various gastrointestinal symptoms and neurodegenerative diseases has been recently discussed. However, there is a lack of research regarding the comparative effects of different surgical procedures on neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, this study primarily focuses on comparing the association between various gastrointestinal surgeries and dementia, aiming to provide guidance for future clinical practice. METHOD: A nationwide study using the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database included 26 059 patients diagnosed with dementia or Alzheimer's disease and 104 236 controls without diseases. Primary exposures were defined as alimentary surgeries, encompassing cholecystectomy, gastrectomy, bowel resection, and appendectomy. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for prior alimentary surgery between cases and controls. RESULTS: The results showed that individuals with dementia had a higher rate of gastrectomy. Additionally, individuals with dementia seemed to exhibit a reduced rate of cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Regarding Alzheimer's disease, all four alimentary surgeries showed comparable trends to those observed with dementia. No significant interaction was observed between alimentary surgery and dementia among the four types of surgery evaluated. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that gastrectomy is associated with an elevated risk of dementia. We aim to uncover more direct evidence in future experiments.

Retrocecal Appendicitis Post-blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Case Report.

Appendicitis, characterized by inflammation and obstruction of the appendiceal lumen, is a common surgical emergency often attributed to various factors. We present the case of an 18-year-old female who developed retrocecal appendicitis following blunt abdominal trauma, a rare occurrence with significant diagnostic challenges. Initial symptoms mimicked upper abdominal trauma, evolving to classic signs of appendicitis within hours. Despite a negative pre-trauma history of abdominal pain, clinical evaluation led to a suspicion of appendicitis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan confirmed the thickening of the cecal appendix, prompting urgent surgical intervention. An open appendectomy revealed a congested retrocecal appendix, supporting the diagnosis. Our case underscores the importance of considering trauma as a potential trigger for appendicitis, especially in the absence of typical pre-trauma symptoms. Diagnostic criteria for post-trauma appendicitis are evolving, and we underscore a comprehensive clinical assessment alongside imaging modalities. While surgical management remains standard, newer approaches like endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy warrant exploration. Further research is essential to refine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for this uncommon presentation, ensuring timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.

Internal and external factors affecting the performance score of surgical trainees doing laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, observational cohort study in a structured training programme.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a common procedure and introduced early in general surgical training. How internal (i.e. surgeon's experience) or external (i.e. disease severity) may affect procedure performance is not well-studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors that may have an influence on the performance scores for surgical trainees. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study of laparoscopic appendectomies performed by surgical trainees (experience < 4 years) operating under supervision. Trainers evaluated trainees' overall performance on a 6-point scale for proficiency. Perioperative data were recorded, including appendicitis severity, operating time and the overall difficulty of the procedure as assessed by the trainer. A "Challenging" procedure was defined as a combination of either/or "perforation" and "difficult". Trainees who had performed > 30 appendectomies were defined as "experienced". The trainees were asked if they had used simulation or web-based tools the week prior to surgery. RESULTS: 142 procedure evaluation forms were included of which 19 (13%) were "perforated", 14 (10%) "difficult" and 24 (17%) "Challenging". Perforated appendicitis was strongly associated with procedure difficulty (OR 21.2, 95% CI 6.0-75.6). Experienced trainees performed "proficient" more often than non-experienced (OR 34.5, 95% CI 6.8-176.5). "Difficult" procedures were inversely associated with proficiency (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0-0.9). In "Challenging" procedures, identifying the appendix had lowest proficiency (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). The procedures assessed as "difficult" had significantly longer operating time with a median (IQR) of 90 (75-100) min compared to 59 (25-120) min for the non-difficult (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both internal and external factors contribute to the performance score. Perforated appendicitis, technical difficult procedures and trainee experience all play a role, but a "difficult" procedure had most overall impact on proficiency evaluation.

Factors prolonging the operative time for transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in pediatric patients: a retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is one of the first endoscopic surgeries performed by trainee pediatric surgeons. While the operative time is generally shorter than for conventional laparoscopic appendectomy, the indications for this procedure are unclear and many unknown factors can prolong the operative time. We conducted this study to identify the factors that may prolong the operative time for TULAA. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted between 2015 and 2023. We performed multivariate analysis to identify the factors associated with prolonged operative time by analyzing TULAA procedures performed by trainees. RESULTS: The study included 243 patients. The median operative time was 84 min (interquartile range, 69-114 min). Multivariate analysis revealed that an increased body mass index, elevated C-reactive protein level, a history of conservative treatment for acute appendicitis, and appendix perforation, for the patient; < 6 years' experience since graduation for the operating surgeon; and lack of board certification as a supervisor from the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons for the attending surgeon were independent risk factors for prolonging the operative time. CONCLUSION: Having an attending surgeon with board certification as a supervisor by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons contributes to reducing the operative time required for TULAA.

The role of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and prognostic nutritional index in the diagnosis of complicated acute appendicitis.

Objectives: C-reactive protein (CRP) levels increase and albumin levels decrease in patients with inflammation. CRP/albumin ratio (CAR) is a new inflammation-associated prognostic indicator. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was described as a simple and neutral indicator of adverse outcomes not only in chronic diseases but also in acute conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of the CAR and PNI value in differentiating complicated acute appendicitis (AA). Material and Methods: We retrospectively examined the medical records of 187 patients with AA. Patients were divided into two groups according to pathological results [non-complicated (n= 161) and complicated (n= 26)]. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pathological data were examined and compared between the groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors for complicated AA. Results: Median age of the study group was 32 (23-41) years, and most of the patients were males (n= 101, 54%). Patients in the complicated AA group were significantly older compared to the patients in the non-complicated AA group [38 (32-49.5) years vs. 30 (22-41) years, p= 0.002]. The complicated AA group had significantly higher CAR level compared to the non-complicated AA group (p= 0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the complicated AA group compared to the non-complicated AA group [2.5 (2-4.25) days vs. 1 (1-2) days, p <0.001]. Other variables (including PNI) did not significantly differ between the groups. In univariate logistic regression analysis, only age was found to be a significant variable (OR= 1.045, 95% CI= 1.016-10.74, p= 0.002), but in multiple variate logistic regression analysis, no variable was found to be significant in predicting complicated AA. Conclusion: We concluded that CAR and PNI value are not independent predictors of complicated AA.

Patients' attitudes toward negative appendectomies and surgery for suspected appendicitis: a qualitative interview study.

INTRODUCTION: From a surgeon's perspective, appendicitis is treated with appendectomy and sometimes a normal appendix is removed. This study aimed to investigate the patients' perspectives on having surgery but not appendicitis and their involvement in treatment decisions. METHODS: This study is reported according to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guideline. Eligible participants either had a normal diagnostic laparoscopy with no resection of the appendix or a negative appendectomy confirmed by histopathology. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: This study consisted of 15 interviews. Analysis of the interviews resulted in the formulation of four categories: (1) discovering the results of the histopathology report, (2) thoughts on having a normal appendix removed or left in situ, (3) the scarce use of shared decision-making, and (4) general anesthesia and the risk of a burst appendix made the participants nervous. CONCLUSION: The amount of information communicated to the patients before and after surgery was sparse. The participants were not aware of the histopathology results and the participants were not involved in decision-making and were generally anxious about anesthesia and a burst appendix.

Surgical and Pre-surgical Factors Affecting Appendectomy Outcomes in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Record Review.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is the preferred treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis and the most common emergency abdominal surgery. While previous studies have investigated variables affecting post-appendectomy complications, local research is limited, and data on complication rates are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate appendectomy outcomes and the factors influencing them. METHODS: This retrospective record review included all patients who underwent appendectomies at our center between 2013 and 2023, excluding those who underwent appendectomies as part of other procedures. Data were retrieved from the hospital database and recorded on predesigned Google Forms. RESULTS: A total of 556 patients were included. Complications occurred in 60 patients (10.8%); the most common included intra-abdominal collections (n=19, 3.4%), postoperative fever (n=13, 2.3%), and surgical site infections (n=11, 2.0%). The most frequently documented histopathological diagnoses included acute appendicitis (n=402, 72.3%), perforated appendicitis (n=109, 19.6%), and gangrenous appendicitis (n=19, 4.4%). Surgical site infection rates were higher after open appendectomies (6.0% vs. 0.9%, P=0.006), while intra-abdominal collections were more frequent after laparoscopic appendectomies (4.1% vs. 0.0%, P=0.095). Additionally, histopathology results showing complicated or chronic appendicitis were associated with higher complication rates (P<0.001, odds ratio=3.793, 95% confidence interval=1.957-7.350). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective review of appendectomy cases in Saudi Arabia. However, this study was conducted in a tertiary care center, which may have caused the rates of complications to appear lower than those in primary centers. We recommend a multi-center study be conducted to establish more accurate results.

A Case of Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm: The Role of Preoperative Imaging and Surgical Technique in Achieving Favorable Outcomes.

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms may present without symptoms or with chronic pain in the right lower quadrant. This report describes a case of a 35-year-old woman who presented with chronic right lower quadrant pain and was found to have a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN). Physical examination revealed localized tenderness in the right lower quadrant with no additional symptoms. Preoperative laboratory results were normal, and a CT scan revealed a cystic appendiceal lesion with an internal calcification, initially mistaken for a fecalith, which led to the decision for exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperative findings confirmed the presence of a cystic-like appendiceal lesion, and an open appendectomy was performed. Histopathological examination revealed a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) confined to the mucosa, without evidence of metastatic disease. The patient had an uneventful recovery and required no additional treatment. This case highlights that surgical intervention with proper technique for confined appendiceal neoplasms, combined with effective preoperative imaging and thorough histopathological examination, is crucial for diagnosis and effective management, ensuring favorable outcomes.

Radiographic Features of a Strangulated Transomental Hernia.

This is a case report of an 82-year-old male who presented with intractable and diffuse abdominal pain and had a computed tomography (CT) abdomen showing a closed loop obstruction in the right hemiabdomen with anteromedial displacement of the cecum and ascending colon. Exploratory laparotomy revealed a gangrenous segment of the ileum strangulated by a transomental hernia in the right lower quadrant. The nonviable bowel was resected, and the healthy bowel segments were anastomosed. It is important to correlate the clinical signs of bowel obstruction with radiographic findings of internal hernia to expedite surgical intervention and prevent complications of bowel ischemia.