Cefiderocol and Intraventricular Colistin for Ventriculitis due to an Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa.

Rheumatoid arthritis, an inflammatory rheumatic disease predominantly affecting small limb joints, frequently compromises the cervical spine, resulting in spinal instability and the potential surgical necessity. This may result in severe complications, such as ventriculitis, often associated with a high mortality rate and multidrug-resistant organisms. A major challenge lies in achieving therapeutic antimicrobial concentrations in the central nervous system. The authors present a case of a 65-year-old female, with cervical myelopathy due to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Following surgery, the patient developed ventriculitis caused by an extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment played a crucial role in facilitating neurological and cognitive recovery.

Commercially available tests for determining cefiderocol susceptibility display variable performance in the Achromobacter genus.

BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections. Testing for cefiderocol susceptibility is challenging with distinct recommendations depending on the pathogens. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the performance of commercial tests for testing cefiderocol susceptibility in the Achromobacter genus and reviewed the literature. METHODS: Diffusion (disks, MIC gradient test strips [MTS], Liofilchem) and broth microdilution (BMD) methods (ComASP™, Liofilchem; UMIC®, Bruker) were compared with the BMD reference method according to the EUCAST guidelines on 143 Achromobacter strains from 14 species with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L. A literature search was conducted regardless of method or species. RESULTS: None of the methods tested fulfilled an acceptable essential agreement (EA). MTS displayed the lowest EA (30.8%) after UMIC® (49%) and ComASP™ (76.9%). All methods achieved an acceptable bias, with MICs either underestimated using MTS (-1.3%) and ComASP™ (-14.2%) or overestimated with UMIC® (+ 9.1%). Inhibition zone diameters ranged from 6 to 38 mm (IZD50/90=33/30 mm). UMIC® and ComASP™ failed to categorize one or the two cefiderocol-resistant strains of this study as resistant unlike the diffusion-based methods. The literature review highlighted distinct performance of the available methods according to pathogens and testing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MTS is discouraged for Achromobacter spp. Disk diffusion can be used to screen for susceptible strains by setting a threshold diameter of 30 mm. UMIC® and ComASP™ should not be used as the sole method but have to be systematically associated with disk diffusion to detect the yet rarely described cefiderocol-resistant Achromobacter sp. strains.

Surveillance of In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacterial isolates is increasingly observed. With the emergence of carbapenem-resistant and pan-resistant pathogens, treating these resistant infections is becoming more challenging due to the limited number of effective drugs. There is a desperate need for the discovery of new antibiotics with novel mechanisms of action. Cefiderocol is one such novel antibiotic with a unique siderophore-based mechanism of action, which has been recently approved for clinical use against drug-resistant pathogens. The present study aims to identify the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against major carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates, including those resistant to colistin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and one carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates were included in the study. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using the automated VITEK® 2 Compact (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) identification and susceptibility testing system, except for colistin and cefiderocol. Colistin resistance in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was assessed using the agar dilution minimum inhibitory concentration method, while for Acinetobacter baumannii, broth microdilution method was employed. Cefiderocol susceptibility testing was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method with 30 µg discs on standard Mueller-Hinton agar plates. For selected isolates, cefiderocol minimum inhibitory concentration detection was performed using broth microdilution with iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. RESULTS: Of the total 101 isolates, the majority (75, 74.25%) were Enterobacterales which included Klebsiella pneumonia (42, 41.58%) and Escherichia coli (33, 32.67%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13, 12.87%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (10, 9.9%). Only three (2.97%) of the isolates were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Most of the isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol, with only four (3.96%) isolates showing resistance. Colistin resistance was observed in six (6.12%) of the isolates. There was a good correlation between disc diffusion testing and broth microdilution testing for the detection of cefiderocol-resistant isolates. No cross-resistance with colistin was observed, as all colistin-resistant isolates were uniformly susceptible to cefiderocol Conclusion: Cefiderocol is highly effective with good in vitro activity against the majority of carbapenem-resistant pathogens. While some isolates do show resistance, it is relatively uncommon. Given its safety profile compared to colistin, cefiderocol can serve as an alternative to colistin to treat carbapenem-resistant infections and it may be considered even for the management of colistin-resistant cases. Disc diffusion testing is a reliable method for identifying cefiderocol-resistant isolates in routine clinical and diagnostic laboratories, especially in resource-limited settings.

Evaluation and optimization of sample size of neonates and infants for pediatric clinical studies on cefiderocol using a model-based approach.

When planning pediatric clinical trials, optimizing the sample size of neonates/infants is essential because it is difficult to enroll these subjects. In this simulation study, we evaluated the sample size of neonates/infants using a model-based optimal approach for identifying their pharmacokinetics for cefiderocol. We assessed the usefulness of data for estimation performance (accuracy and variance of parameter estimation) from adults and the impact of data from very young subjects, including preterm neonates. Stochastic simulation and estimation were utilized to assess the impact of sample size allocation for age categories in estimation performance for population pharmacokinetic parameters in pediatrics. The inclusion of adult pharmacokinetic information improved the estimation performance of population pharmacokinetic parameters as the coefficient of variation (CV) range of parameter estimation decreased from 4.9%-593.7% to 2.3%-17.3%. When sample size allocation was based on the age groups of gestational age and postnatal age, the data showed 15 neonates/infants would be necessary to appropriately estimate pediatric pharmacokinetic parameters (<20%CV). By using the postmenstrual age (PMA), which is theoretically considered to be associated with the maturation of organs, the number of neonates/infants required for appropriate parameter estimation could be reduced to seven (one and six with <32 and >32 weeks PMA, respectively) to nine (three and six with <37 and >37 weeks PMA, respectively) subjects. The model-based optimal design approach allowed efficient evaluation of the sample size of neonates/infants for estimation of pediatric pharmacokinetic parameters. This approach to assessment should be useful when designing pediatric clinical trials, especially those including young children.

Hetero-antagonism of avibactam and sulbactam with cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp.

Cefiderocol, a siderophore-cephalosporine conjugate antibiotic, shows promise as a therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) Acinetobacter infections. While resistance has already been reported in A. baumannii, combination therapies with avibactam or sulbactam reduce MICs of cefiderocol, extending its efficacy. However, careful consideration is necessary when using these combinations. In our experiments, exposure of A. baumannii and A. lwoffii to cefiderocol and sulbactam or avibactam led to the selection of cefiderocol-resistant strains. Three of those were subjected to whole genome sequencing and transcriptomic analysis. The strains all possessed synonymous and non-synonymous substitutions and short deletions. The most significant mutations affected efflux pumps, transcriptional regulators, and iron homeostasis genes. Transcriptomics showed significant alterations in expression levels of outer membrane proteins, iron homeostasis, and ß-lactamases, suggesting adaptive responses to selective pressure. This study underscores the importance of carefully assessing drug synergies, as they may inadvertently foster the selection of resistant variants and complicate the management of CR Acinetobacter infections.IMPORTANCEThe emergence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter strains as a serious global health threat underscores the urgent need for effective treatment options. Although few drugs show promise against CR Acinetobacter infections, resistance to both drugs has been reported. In this study, the molecular characterization of spontaneous cefiderocol-resistant variants, a CR A. baumannii strain with antagonism to sulbactam, and an A. lwoffii strain with antagonism to avibactam, provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of resistance to cefiderocol. Some mechanisms observed are associated with mutations affecting efflux pumps, regulators, and iron homeostasis genes. These findings highlight the importance of understanding resistance mechanisms to optimize treatment options. They also emphasize the importance of early evaluation of drug synergies to address the challenges of antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter infections.

Predicting early appropriate therapy for patients infected by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in intensive care units in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs) is linked with high morbidity and mortality in patients. In this study, we estimated the therapeutic coverage of various antibiotics, focusing on cefiderocol and comparators, administered empirically against an infection of unknown origin in the ICU. METHODS: In the ARTEMIS surveillance study, susceptibilities of 624 Italian Gram-negative isolates to amikacin, aztreonam-avibactam, cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, colistin, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, and meropenem-vaborbactam were tested by broth microdilution, and results were interpreted by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. The susceptibility rates from the ARTEMIS study were extrapolated to Gram-negative isolates obtained from 5,774 patients in Italian ICUs in 2021. The sum of the predicted susceptibilities of individual pathogens represented the overall likelihood of in vitro activity of each antibiotic as early targeted therapy for ICU patients. RESULTS: A total of 624 Italian Gram-negative isolates included 206 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 138 Acinetobacter baumannii, 187 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 93 Escherichia coli. Against A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, the overall susceptibility rates for cefiderocol were 87.7%, 96.8%, 99%, and 100%, respectively; and for comparator agents, 8.7-96.4%, 25.7-100%, 73.3-100%, and 89.2-100%, respectively. Among the subset of meropenem-resistant isolates, susceptibility rates of A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa to cefiderocol were 86.4%, 96.2% and 100%, respectively. Corresponding susceptibility rates to comparator agents were 0-96.8%, 0-100%, and 6.4-100%, respectively. There were no meropenem-resistant isolates of E. coli. The extrapolation of data to isolates from Italian ICUs showed that the highest likelihood of therapeutic coverage, both overall and among meropenem-resistant isolates, was reported for colistin (96.8% and 72.2%, respectively) and cefiderocol (95.7% and 71.4%, respectively). All other antibiotics were associated with a likelihood below 73% overall and between 0% and 41.4% for meropenem-resistant isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on confirmed susceptibility rates and reported ICU prevalence of multiple Gram-negative species, cefiderocol showed a higher predicted therapeutic coverage and utility in ICUs compared with comparator beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotics. Cefiderocol may be a promising early treatment option for patients at high risk of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in the ICU.

Synergistic Activity of Cefiderocol in Combination with Avibactam, Sulbactam or Tazobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

We investigated the activity of cefiderocol/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against clinical strains with different susceptibility profiles to cefiderocol to explore the potentiality of antibiotic combinations as a strategy to contain the major public health problem of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Specifically, we evaluated the synergistic activity of cefiderocol with avibactam, sulbactam, or tazobactam on three of the most "Critical Priority" group of MDR bacteria (carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii). Clinical isolates were genomically characterized by Illumina iSeq 100. The synergy test was conducted with time-kill curve assays. Specifically, cefiderocol/avibactam, /sulbactam, or /tazobactam combinations were analyzed. Synergism was assigned if bacterial grow reduction reached 2 log10 CFU/mL. We reported the high antimicrobial activity of the cefiderocol/sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii; of the cefiderocol/avibactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; and of the cefiderocol/tazobactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. Our results demonstrate that all ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) tested are able to enhance cefiderocol antimicrobial activity, also against cefiderocol-resistant isolates. The cefiderocol/sulbactam combination emerges as the most promising combination, proving to highly enhance cefiderocol activity in all the analyzed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative isolates, whereas the Cefiderocol/tazobactam combination resulted in being active only against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, and cefiderocol/avibactam was only active against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

Cefiderocol heteroresistance associated with mutations in TonB-dependent receptor genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa of clinical origin.

The siderophore-cephalosporin cefiderocol (FDC) presents a promising treatment option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) P. aeruginosa (PA). FDC circumvents traditional porin and efflux-mediated resistance by utilizing TonB-dependent receptors (TBDRs) to access the periplasmic space. Emerging FDC resistance has been associated with loss of function mutations within TBDR genes or the regulatory genes controlling TBDR expression. Further, difficulties with antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and unexpected negative clinical treatment outcomes have prompted concerns for heteroresistance, where a single lineage isolate contains resistant subpopulations not detectable by standard AST. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of TBDR mutations among clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and the phenotypic effect on FDC susceptibility and heteroresistance. We evaluated the sequence of pirR, pirS, pirA, piuA, or piuD from 498 unique isolates collected before the introduction of FDC from four clinical sites in Portland, OR (1), Houston, TX (2), and Santiago, Chile (1). At some clinical sites, TBDR mutations were seen in up to 25% of isolates, and insertion, deletion, or frameshift mutations were predicted to impair protein function were seen in 3% of all isolates (n = 15). Using population analysis profile testing, we found that P. aeruginosa with major TBDR mutations were enriched for a heteroresistant phenotype and undergo a shift in the susceptibility distribution of the population as compared to susceptible strains with wild-type TBDR genes. Our results indicate that mutations in TBDR genes predate the clinical introduction of FDC, and these mutations may predispose to the emergence of FDC resistance.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Türkiye.

PURPOSE: Carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) is escalating worldwide and leaves clinicians few therapeutic options in recent years, ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infection and have shown potent activity against isolates defined as carbapenem resistant. The aim of this study was to determine the phenotypic profile of these agents against CR-PA in the emerging setting of carbapenemases. METHODS: CR-PA clinical isolates were collected from three teaching hospitals in different geographical regions between January 2017-December 2021. All isolates were subjected to phenotypic carbapenemase testing using modified carbapenem inactivation method. MICs were determined by reference broth microdilution and evaluated according to EUCAST standards, while genotypic profiling was determined using PCR methods. RESULTS: 244 CR-PA sourced most frequently from the respiratory tract (32.2%), blood (20.4%) and urine (17.5%) were evaluated. Of all isolates, 32 (13.1%) were phenotypically and 38 (15.6%) were genotypically defined as carbapenemase-positive. The most common carbapenemase was GES (63.1%), followed by VIM (15.8%). The MIC50/90(S%) of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and cefiderocol in all CR-PA isolates were 4 and 32 (80%), 1 and > 64 (69%) and 0.25 and 1 mg/L (96%), respectively. Cefiderocol was also the most active agent in carbapenemase-positive isolates (90%). CONSLUSION: While ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam remained highly active against CR-PA devoid of carbapenemases, cefiderocol provided potent in vitro activity irrespective of carbapenemase production. When considering the potential clinical utility of newer agents against CR-PA, regional variations in carbapenemase prevalence must be considered.

Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-ß-lactamase producers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.

Treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Patients with severe carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections currently face significant treatment challenges. When patients display signs of infection and the clinical suspicion of CRAB infections is high, appropriate treatment should be immediately provided. However, current treatment plans and clinical data for CRAB are limited. Inherent and acquired resistance mechanisms, as well as host factors, significantly restrict options for empirical medication. Moreover, inappropriate drug coverage can have detrimental effects on patients. Most existing studies have limitations, such as a restricted sample size, and are predominantly observational or non-randomized, which report significant variability in patient infection severity and comorbidities. Therefore, a gold-standard therapy remains lacking. Current and future treatment options of infections due to CRAB were described in this review. The dose and considerable side effects restrict treatment options for polymyxins, and high doses of ampicillin-sulbactam or tigecycline appear to be the best option at the time of initial treatment. Moreover, new drugs such as durlobactam and cefiderocol have substantial therapeutic capabilities and may be effective salvage treatments. Bacteriophages and antimicrobial peptides may serve as alternative treatment options in the near future. The advantages of a combination antimicrobial regimen appear to predominate those of a single regimen. Despite its significant nephrotoxicity, colistin is considered a primary treatment and is often used in combination with antimicrobials, such as tigecycline, ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, or fosfomycin. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has deemed high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam, which is typically combined with high-dose tigecycline, polymyxin, and other antibacterial agents, the best option for treating serious CRAB infections. A rational combination of drug use and the exploration of new therapeutic drugs can alleviate or prevent the effects of CRAB infections, shorten hospital stays, and reduce patient mortality.

Novel Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Nosocomial Pneumonia.

Nosocomial pneumonia, including hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is the leading cause of death related to hospital-acquired infections among critically ill patients. A growing proportion of these cases are attributed to multi-drug-resistant (MDR-) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). MDR-GNB pneumonia often leads to delayed appropriate treatment, prolonged hospital stays, and increased morbidity and mortality. This issue is compounded by the increased toxicity profiles of the conventional antibiotics required to treat MDR-GNB infections. In recent years, several novel antibiotics have been licensed for the treatment of GNB nosocomial pneumonia. These novel antibiotics are promising therapeutic options for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia by MDR pathogens with certain mechanisms of resistance. Still, antibiotic resistance remains an evolving global crisis, and resistance to novel antibiotics has started emerging, making their judicious use crucial to prolong their shelf-life. This article presents an up-to-date review of these novel antibiotics and their current role in the antimicrobial armamentarium. We critically present data for the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, the in vitro spectrum of antimicrobial activity and resistance, and in vivo data for their clinical and microbiological efficacy in trials. Where possible, available data are summarized specifically in patients with nosocomial pneumonia, as this cohort may exhibit 'critical illness' physiology that affects drug efficacy.

Comparison of Different Methods for Assaying the In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains: Influence of Bacterial Inoculum.

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections represent a critical public health concern, highlighting the need for the development of effective antibiotics. Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, particularly in strains that are resistant to other drugs. However, concerns regarding the emergence of drug-resistant strains persist. This study, conducted with 109 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from the Spanish Hospital (Dr. Balmis, Alicante). The study evaluated susceptibility to cefiderocol in comparison to alternative antibiotics and including their susceptibility to bacterial inoculum, while assessing various testing methods. Our findings revealed high susceptibility to cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant strains, with only 2 of 109 strains exhibiting resistance. Comparative analysis demonstrated superiority of cefiderocol towards alternative antibiotics. Both the E-test and disk-diffusion methods showed 100% concordance with the microdilution method in classifying strains as susceptible or resistant. However, 4.6% (5/109) of disc zone diameters fell within the technical uncertainty zone, so the E-test technique was found to be more useful in routine clinical practice. Additionally, escalating bacterial inoculum correlated with decreases in vitro activity, so this parameter should be adjusted very carefully in in vivo studies. This study underscores cefiderocol's potential as a therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. However, the emergence of drug-resistant strains emphasizes the critical need for a wise use of antibiotics and a continuous monitoring of resistance to antibiotics. Based on our in vitro data, further investigation concerning the impact of bacterial inoculum on drug efficacy is warranted in order to detect resistance mechanisms and optimize treatment strategies, thereby mitigating the risk of resistance.

Unveiling the Secrets of Acinetobacter baumannii: Resistance, Current Treatments, and Future Innovations.

Acinetobacter baumannii represents a significant concern in nosocomial settings, particularly in critically ill patients who are forced to remain in hospital for extended periods. The challenge of managing and preventing this organism is further compounded by its increasing ability to develop resistance due to its extraordinary genomic plasticity, particularly in response to adverse environmental conditions. Its recognition as a significant public health risk has provided a significant impetus for the identification of new therapeutic approaches and infection control strategies. Indeed, currently used antimicrobial agents are gradually losing their efficacy, neutralized by newer and newer mechanisms of bacterial resistance, especially to carbapenem antibiotics. A deep understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms is urgently needed to shed light on the properties that allow A. baumannii enormous resilience against standard therapies. Among the most promising alternatives under investigation are the combination sulbactam/durlobactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/funobactam, xeruborbactam, and the newest molecules such as novel polymyxins or zosurabalpin. Furthermore, the potential of phage therapy, as well as deep learning and artificial intelligence, offer a complementary approach that could be particularly useful in cases where traditional strategies fail. The fight against A. baumannii is not confined to the microcosm of microbiological research or hospital wards; instead, it is a broader public health dilemma that demands a coordinated, global response.

Cefiderocol utilization in lung transplant recipients at a single center.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant organisms are increasing and are a significant cause of mortality among lung transplant recipients (LTRs). To assist with this issue, novel pharmacotherapies are being developed. This study describes the utilization of a novel antibiotic, cefiderocol (FDC), in LTRs where limited data exists in the current literature. We primarily assessed the clinical indications, duration of therapy, resistance, and adverse effects. METHODS: Conducted as a single-center retrospective review, this study included adult LTRs who received FDC for at least 24 h. Data, extracted from electronic medical records, encompassed patient demographics, transplant history, antimicrobial dosing, adverse effects, bacterial cultures, and outcomes. The research protocol received institutional review board approval. RESULTS: FDC exhibited effectiveness against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with 26% 30-day mortality and microbiological clearance observed in nine out of 13 cases. Notably, FDC was used in diverse clinical settings, including for prophylaxis, empiric, and targeted treatment. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to evaluate optimal clinical indications for FDC use in LTRs.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB): metabolic adaptation and transcriptional response to human urine (HU).

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a major human pathogen and a research priority for developing new antimicrobial agents. CRAB is a causative agent of a variety of infections in different body sites. One of the manifestations is catheter-associated urinary tract infection, which exposes the bacteria to the host's urine, creating a particular environment. Exposure of two CRAB clinical isolates, AB5075 and AMA40, to human urine (HU) resulted in the differential expression levels of 264 and 455 genes, respectively, of which 112 were common to both strains. Genes within this group play roles in metabolic pathways such as phenylacetic acid (PAA) catabolism, the Hut system, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and other processes like quorum sensing and biofilm formation. These results indicate that the presence of HU induces numerous adaptive changes in gene expression of the infecting bacteria. These modifications presumably help bacteria establish and thrive in the hostile conditions in the urinary tract. These analyses advance our understanding of CRAB's metabolic adaptations to human fluids, as well as expanding knowledge on bacterial responses to distinct human fluids containing different concentrations of human serum albumin (HSA).

Impact of extended-spectrum chromosomal AmpC (ESAC) of Escherichia coli on susceptibility to cefiderocol.

The impact of chromosomally encoded wild-type or extended-spectrum (ESAC) AmpC ß-lactamases of Escherichia coli on susceptibility to ceftazidime, cefepime, and cefiderocol was evaluated in different genetic backgrounds, including wild-type, PBP3-modified, and porin-deficient E. coli strains. Recombinant E. coli strains possessing the different backgrounds and producing variable ESACs were evaluated. Although ESAC enzymes conferred resistance to ceftazidime and decreased susceptibility to cefepime as expected, we showed here that cefiderocol was also a substrate of ESAC enzymes. IMPORTANCE: We showed here that chromosomally encoded intrinsic extended-spectrum cephalosporinases of Escherichia coli may impact susceptibility not only to ceftazidime and cefepime but also to cefiderocol.

In vivo emergence of cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam cross-resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae following ceftazidime/avibactam -based therapies.

We described the emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol cross-resistance in patients with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. All strains with ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol cross-resistance showed point mutations on KPC Ω-loop. Taken together, our results indicate that prolonged exposure to ceftazidime/avibactam can confer cross-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol.

Should we, and how to, optimize cefiderocol administration during severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii? A viewpoint.

OBJECTIVES: Acinetobacter baumannii is classified by the centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as an "urgent threat" due to its ability to acquire and develop resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics. As a result, it is one of the most concerning pathogens in healthcare settings, with increasing incidence of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, there are ongoing efforts to find novel treatment options, one of which is cefiderocol. We aim to review available evidence on cefiderocol use for severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. METHODS: A comprehensive review was conducted from 2017 to 2023, covering articles from databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase, along with conference proceedings from ECCMID 2023. The primary focus was on severe nosocomial pneumonia due A. baumannii and cefiderocol. DISCUSSION: Cefiderocol, targeting periplasmic space Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs) via siderophore transport pathways, exhibits promise against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Its effectiveness in treating CRAB pneumonia remains debated. The CREDIBLE trial reported higher mortality with cefiderocol compared to the best available treatment, while other cohort studies showed contrasting outcomes. Patient variations and pharmacokinetic factors may underlie these discrepancies. The recommended cefiderocol dosage regimen may fall short of desired pharmacokinetic targets, especially in critically ill patients and lung infections. Pulmonary factors hindering cefiderocol's entry into bacteria through iron transporters are overlooked in clinical breakpoints. Optimized dosing or combination regimens may enhance infection site exposure and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to determine the optimal cefiderocol dosage and administration (mono vs. dual therapy, continuous vs. intermittent infusion), in severe Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial pneumonia.