The role of medical physics experts in clinical trials: A guideline from the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

The EFOMP working group on the Role of Medical Physics Experts (MPEs) in Clinical Trials was established in 2010, with experts from across Europe and different areas of medical physics. Their main aims were: (1) To develop a consensus guidance document for the work MPEs do in clinical trials across Europe. (2) Complement the work by American colleagues in AAPM TG 113 and guidance from National Member Organisations. (3) To cover external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, nuclear medicine, molecular radiotherapy, and imaging. This document outlines the main output from this working group. Giving guidance to MPEs, and indeed all Medical Physicists (MP) and MP trainees wishing to work in clinical trials. It also gives guidance to the wider multidisciplinary team, advising where MPEs must legally be involved, as well as highlighting areas where MPEs skills and expertise can really add value to clinical trials.

Development of a vocational rehabilitation intervention to support return-to-work and well-being following major trauma: a person-based approach.

OBJECTIVES: Major trauma centres (MTCs) save lives but rehabilitation to support return-to-work (RTW) is lacking. This paper describes development of a vocational rehabilitation intervention (the ROWTATE intervention) to support RTW following traumatic injury. DESIGN: Sequential and iterative person-based approach in four stages-Stage 1: review of evidence about the efficacy and mechanisms of RTW interventions; Stage 2: interviews (n=38) and focus groups (n=25) with trauma survivors and service providers in five UK MTCs to identify the issues, and challenges faced postinjury; Stage 3: codesign workshops (n=43) with trauma stakeholders in MTCs to conceptually test and identify intervention delivery barriers/enablers; Stage 4: meetings (n=7) with intervention development working group (IDWG) to: (1) generate guiding principles, (2) identify key intervention features (process, components, mechanisms) to address unmet rehabilitation needs; (3) generate a logic model and programme theory to illustrate how the intervention works; and (4) develop a training package to support delivery. RESULTS: Trauma survivors described unmet needs relating to early advice about RTW; psychological support; pain management; hidden disabilities (eg, fatigue); estimating recovery; and community, amputee and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Mechanisms of effective interventions identified in the review included early intervention, colocation, employer engagement, case coordination and work accommodations. Intervention features identified by IDWG members (n=13) from stages 1 and 2 were use of stepped-care approaches by occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs), OT/CP formulation for complex cases, assessment of mental health problems, individually tailored rehabilitation including vocational goal setting, cross-sector coordination/communication, employer engagement, phased RTW, education/advice for family/employers, exploration of work alternatives, ongoing review of physical and mental health needs, work stability monitoring. Conceptual testing ratified the logic model. Geography and long waiting lists were identified as potential delivery barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world testing of the intervention is underway in a randomised controlled trial.

Plain language summary: 5-year results from the CROWN study of lorlatinib vs crizotinib in non-small-cell lung cancer.

WHAT IS THIS STUDY ABOUT?: This is a summary of the results of an ongoing study called CROWN. In the CROWN study, researchers looked at the effects of two medicines called lorlatinib (Lorbrena) and crizotinib (Xalkori) for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not been treated yet. Everyone in the study had changes in a gene called anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or ALK, in their cancer cells. The changes in the ALK gene can make cancer grow. This analysis looked at how well lorlatinib and crizotinib worked and their side effects in people with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC after 5 years. WHAT DID THIS STUDY FIND?: After observing people for an average of 5 years, researchers found that more people who took lorlatinib were still alive without their cancer getting worse than the people who took crizotinib. At 5 years, the probability of being alive without their cancer getting worse was 60% in people who took lorlatinib compared with 8% in people who took crizotinib. Fewer people who took lorlatinib had their cancer spread within or to the brain than the people who took crizotinib. In more than half of the people who took lorlatinib, tumors that had spread to the brain did not get worse, and no new tumors spread to the brain after 5 years. In contrast, in about half of the people who took crizotinib, tumors that had spread to the brain got worse or new tumors spread to the brain after 16.4 months. More people who took lorlatinib (115 out of 149, or 77%) had severe or life-threatening side effects than people who took crizotinib (81 out of 142, or 57%). These side effects were like the ones reported in the earlier 3-year analysis. WHAT DO THE FINDINGS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: The 5-year results from the CROWN study showed that more people who took lorlatinib continued to benefit from their treatment than those who took crizotinib. The 5-year benefit of lorlatinib in people with ALK-positive NSCLC has never been seen before.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03052608 (Phase 3 CROWN study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Glycaemic outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes over 34 weeks with the Omnipod® 5 automated insulin delivery system.

AIMS: The aim was to evaluate the effect of extended use of the Omnipod® 5 automated insulin delivery (AID) system in adults with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following an 8-week single-arm, multicentre, outpatient trial of AID in adults with type 2 diabetes and baseline ≥ 64 mmol/mol, participants were given the opportunity to continue use of the AID system in a 26-week (~6 month) extension phase. The primary safety endpoints were percentage of time with sensor glucose ≥ 250 mg/dL and < 54 mg/dL. Additional glycaemic measures, including percentage of time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) and HbA1c, were evaluated. The use of non-insulin anti-hyperglycaemic medications was permitted throughout the entire study. RESULTS: During the initial 8-week study, participants (N = 22) achieved a decrease in percentage of time ≥ 250 mg/dL from 27.4% ± 21.0% to 10.5% ± 8.8% (p < 0.0001), which further decreased to 9.7% ± 9.2% during the extension phase (p = 0.0002 vs. standard therapy). Percentage of time < 54 mg/dL remained low from standard therapy through extension (median [interquartile range] 0.00% [0.00%, 0.06%] vs. 0.02% [0.00%, 0.05%], p > 0.05). HbA1c decreased by 1.6% ± 1.2% (15.5 ± 13.1 mmol/mol, p < 0.0001) and TIR increased by 22.4% ± 19.2% (p < 0.0001) from standard therapy through extension with no significant change in body mass index and without an observed increase in total daily insulin requirements. CONCLUSIONS: These longer-term findings of Omnipod 5 AID system use demonstrate the potential value of AID in helping people with type 2 diabetes reach glycaemic targets.

Tooth sensitivity in different arches post in-office dental bleaching: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), as well as bleaching efficacy (BE) in the maxillary and mandibular arches after in-office dental bleaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 90 participants were randomly into two groups according to the arch (maxillary or mandibular) in which the patient will first receive a 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (2 sessions; 1 × 30 min; 1 week apart). TS and GI were recorded immediately after, up to 1 h, 24 h and 48 h after bleaching, using the 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). BE was assessed before bleaching and 30 days after the end of the treatment (shade guide units [ΔSGU], CIELab [ΔEab], CIEDE2000 [ΔE00], and Whiteness Index for Dentistry [WID]). TS and GI were compared using McNemar's and paired t-test. BE were compared with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (ΔSGU) and paired t-test (ΔEab, ΔE00, and WID) (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The risk and the intensity of TS was statistically higher for the mandibular arch (p < 0.003). The risk and intensity of GI did not differ between arches (p > 0.38). Both arches demonstrated significant BE (ΔSGU, ΔEab, ΔE00 and WID), without differences between them (p > 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In-office dental bleaching induces higher risk and the intensity of TS in the mandibular arch when compared to maxillary arch, without significant differences in gingival irritation, or bleaching efficacy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Most patients experience tooth sensitivity regardless of the dental arch involved. However, when performing in-office dental bleaching, clinicians should consider that the mandibular arch is more likely to experience greater sensitivity compared to the maxillary arch.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single intravenous dose of SHR-1707 in healthy adult subjects: two randomized, double-blind, single-ascending-dose, phase 1 studies.

BACKGROUND: SHR-1707 is a novel humanized anti-Aß IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to Aß fibrils and monomers to block the formation of Aß plaques or to promote the microglial phagocytosis of Aß. Preclinical studies showed that SHR-1707 reduced brain Aß deposition in 5xFAD transgenic mice. Herein, we conducted two phase 1 studies to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a single intravenous dose of SHR-1707 in healthy adult subjects. METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind, single-ascending-dose, phase 1 studies were conducted in China (Study CHN) and Australia (Study AUS). Study CHN consisted of 2 parts. In Part 1, eligible healthy young adults (18-45 years) were sequentially randomized 8:2 to receive SHR-1707 (five cohorts: 2, 6, 20, 40, and 60 mg/kg) or placebo in each cohort; in Part 2, elderly subjects (55-80 years) were randomized 8:4 to receive SHR-1707 (20 mg/kg) or placebo. A similar design was used in Study AUS, but with only healthy young adults enrolled across three dosing cohorts (2, 20, and 60 mg/kg). RESULTS: Sixty-two (part 1/2, n = 50/12; age range, 18-42/55-63 years) and 30 subjects (age range, 18-42 years) received SHR-1707 or placebo in Study CHN and Study AUS, respectively. In Study CHN, all treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mild, with the most common being transient laboratory abnormalities. In Study AUS, TRAEs were mostly mild (1 moderate event each with SHR-1707/placebo); the most common TRAEs with SHR-1707 were dysgeusia and fatigue (8.3% each). In both studies, the exposure of SHR-1707 increased in a slightly greater than dose-proportional manner over the dose range of 2-60 mg/kg in young adults; there was a dose-dependent increase in plasma Aß42 concentration following SHR-1707 administration compared with the placebo group. The safety and PK and PD profiles of SHR-1707 in the elderly subjects were consistent with the younger counterpart at the same dose level. No ethnic difference in safety, PK and PD of SHR-1707 was observed. CONCLUSIONS: A single intravenous dose of SHR-1707 at 2-60 mg/kg was safe and well tolerated in healthy young adult and elderly subjects. The PK and PD profiles are supportive for further clinical development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04973189 (retrospectively registered on Jul.21, 2021) and NCT04745104 (registered on Feb.6, 2021) on clinicaltrials.gov.

Patient-reported disease burden in the Accelerate Clinical Trials in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Health Index (CMT-HI) is a disease-specific, patient-reported disease burden measure. As part of an international clinical trial readiness study, individuals with CMT1A (ages 18-75 years) underwent clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including the CMT-HI, to capture their longitudinal perspective on the disease burden. METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen participants underwent serial COAs including the CMT-HI, CMT Functional Outcome Measure (CMT-FOM), CMT Neuropathy Score (CMTNSv2R), and CMT Exam Score (CMTES/CMTES-R). Correlations between the total and subscale scores for the CMT-HI and other COAs were determined. Changes in the CMT-HI scores over 12 months were assessed using paired t-tests. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the CMT-HI and its subscales were calculated by anchoring to a participant global impression of change scale. RESULTS: At baseline, CMT1A participants were 44.5 ± 15 years old (range: 18-75) and 58% were women. The mean CMT-HI was 25.7 ± 18.8 (range: 0-91.9; 100 reflecting maximal disease burden). The CMT-HI correlated with the CMT-FOM (r = .54, p < .0001), CMTNSv2R (r = .48, p < .0001), and CMTES/CMTES-R (r = .52/r = .54, p < .0001). Disease burden was greater in women than in men (CMT-HI 29.1 ± 19.1 vs. 21.2 ± 17.3, p = .001). Over 12 months, there was a nonsignificant mean increase in CMT-HI of 0.40 ± 10.0 (n = 189, p = .89). The MCID for the CMT-HI total score was 3.8 points (95% CI: 1.7-5.9). DISCUSSION: Patient-reported disease burden in CMT1A as measured by the CMT-HI is associated with measures of neurologic impairment and physical functioning. Women reported a higher disease burden than men. These data will inform the design of clinical trials in CMT1A.

Reduction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in prostate cancer murine models and patients following white button mushroom treatment.

BACKGROUND: In a previously reported Phase I trial, we observed therapy-associated declines in circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) with the administration of white button mushroom (WBM) tablets in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. These observations led us to hypothesise that WBM could mitigate PCa progression by suppressing MDSCs. METHODS: We performed bidirectional translational research to examine the immunomodulatory effects of WBM consumption in both syngeneic murine PCa models and patients with PCa participating in an ongoing randomised Phase II trial (NCT04519879). RESULTS: In murine models, WBM treatment significantly suppressed tumour growth with a reduction in both the number and function of MDSCs, which in turn promoted antitumour immune responses mediated by T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. In patients, after consumption of WBM tablets for 3 months, we observed a decline in circulating polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs), along with an increase in cytotoxic CD8+ T and NK cells. Furthermore, single immune cell profiling of peripheral blood from WBM-treated patients showed suppressed STAT3/IRF1 and TGFß signalling in circulating PMN-MDSCs. Subclusters of PMN-MDSCs presented transcriptional profiles associated with responsiveness to fungi, neutrophil chemotaxis, leukocyte aggregation, and regulation of inflammatory response. Finally, in mouse models of PCa, we found that WBM consumption enhanced the anticancer activity of anti-PD-1 antibodies, indicating that WBM may be used as an adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Our results from PCa murine models and patients provide mechanistic insights into the immunomodulatory effects of WBM and provide a scientific foundation for WBM as a nutraceutical intervention to delay or prevent PCa progression. HIGHLIGHTS: White button mushroom (WBM) treatment resulted in a reduction in pro-tumoural MDSCs, notably polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs), along with activation of anti-tumoural T and NK cells. Human single immune cell gene expression profiling shed light on the molecular alterations induced by WBM, specifically on PMN-MDSCs. A proof-of-concept study combining WBM with PD-1 blockade in murine models revealed an additive effect on tumour regression and survival outcomes, highlighting the clinical relevance of WBM in cancer management.

Characteristic of clinical trials related to traumatic brain injury registered on ClinicalTrials.gov over the past two decades (2004-2023).

Objective: The aim of this report is to provide a comprehensive overview of clinical trials and protocols related to traumatic brain injury over the past two decades. Methods: We collected information on clinical trials related to traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the ClinicalTrials.gov database, identified key categorical variables, and assessed their characteristics. Results: A total of 367 TBI-related trials were identified for analysis. All identified trials were interventional clinical trials. Most trials were small-scale, with 75.2% enrolling 1-100 participants, and only about 20% were funded by industry or the National Institutes of Health (NIH). In most trials, participants were gender-neutral (96.5%), and the primary age group was adults and older adults (56.9%). Of all identified TBI trials, 78.2% were randomized, and 69.4% were blinded. Additionally, the primary purpose of 297 trials (80.9%) was treatment, with drug therapy as the most common intervention. A total of 153 trials (41.7%) were completed; however, only 58 trials submitted results to the registry. Furthermore, 81 trials (22.1%) were discontinued early, primarily due to recruitment problems. Clinical trials started between 2004 and 2013 reported a higher proportion of results compared with those started between 2014 and 2023 (35.1% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). In addition, between 2014 and 2023, there was an increase in trials for diagnostic purposes (2.4% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Based on the data collected from the ClinicalTrials.gov, our study reveals that most clinical trials related to TBI focus on drug-related treatments, underreporting remains a significant concern, and greater emphasis should be placed on improving the publication and dissemination of clinical trial results.

Applications of leech therapy in medicine: a systematic review.

Background: Leech therapy (LT) is one of the most widely used treatment methods in traditional medicine. The present study aimed to systematically review clinical trials regarding the effects of LT on the prevention and healing of different diseases. Methods: To identify all relevant published studies, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases without any temporal or geographical constraints until April 2023. To categorize the articles, five stages were considered. The PRISMA checklist and Cochran's bias analysis tool were used. Results: In total, 12 trials that met the inclusion criteria were studied. The results of the studies showed that LT has had successful outcomes in treating different conditions. These included hormonal and metabolic complications, cardiovascular problems, and inflammatory-based diseases. Conclusion: "Leech therapy" is a traditional medical treatment used successfully to control and treat various conditions. Although this method can have complications, it is possible to benefit from this low-cost and low-complication treatment by taking preventive measures.

Insights into existing and futuristic treatment approach for chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Oncogenes play a crucial part in human cancer development, and when particular drugs obstruct the proteins produced by these oncogenes, the tumoural process can be ceased. For instance, in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), all pathological traits are associated with a single oncogene, BCR-ABL1. CML is a triphasic cancerous disorder of haematopoietic stem cells, marked by a balanced translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22, leading to the genesis of a Philadelphia chromosome encompassing the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. This fusion oncogene further produces a constitutive active tyrosine kinase protein, enhancing the downstream signalling pathways and constitutes cancer. The treatment for CML has been entirely altered from chemotherapy and immunotherapy to targeted therapy with the emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) which inhibit BCR-ABL1 kinase activity. However, the inhibitory mechanism of TKIs is constrained by BCR-ABL1 dependent and independent resistance mechanisms, prompting the exploration of novel therapeutics through extensive clinical trials to develop next-generation drugs with enhanced potency. The persistent challenges posed by CML have motivated researchers to seek innovative strategies for its eradication, such as the application of the genome editing tool CRISPR/Cas9. This review provides insights into existing CML diagnoses, treatment modalities, resistance mechanisms, drugs under trial phases and new potential therapeutic drugs. Furthermore, the review looks ahead to a visionary perspective wherein the CRISPR/Cas9 approach holds the potential to evolve into a prospective curative measure for CML.

Concussion Health Improvement Program (CHIP): study protocol for a randomized controlled optimization trial for youth with persistent post-concussive symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Up to 1.9 million youth in the USA sustain a concussion each year, and up to 30% experience persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) lasting 1 month or more. PPCS can substantially interfere with social, emotional, and academic functioning. Despite these concerns, few evidence-based treatments are available for youth with PPCS. We previously found effectiveness in treating youth with concussion using a collaborative care intervention that integrates mental health care into a medical model, with improvements in concussive symptoms and quality of life at 1 year. Using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework, we now aim to assess the contribution of each of the three components that were part of collaborative care: concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (cf-CBT), parenting skills training (PST), and care management (CM). METHODS: The MOST factorial design examines all three intervention components with two levels of each (present or absent), resulting in 8 possible treatment combinations. We will recruit 368 youth with PPCS from 2 geographic locations (Seattle and Dallas), randomizing them to 1 of 8 treatment groups. Youth and/or parents will attend treatment sessions via video conferencing software over 3 months, and complete surveys regarding primary outcomes (concussive symptoms and health-related quality of life) and secondary outcomes (sleep, pain, mood, and parental distress) at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. We will also assess potential mediators and moderators to allow for future tailoring and refinement. DISCUSSION: The overarching goal of this investigation is to determine which collaborative care components (delivered individually or in combination) are most effective in treating PPCS in concussion-exposed youth. The investigation will inform mental health screening, intervention, and referral procedures for youth and families following concussion. At the completion of this study, we will have an optimized and refined intervention for youth with PPCS ready for large-scale implementation and dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06036147. Registered on September 13, 2023.

Alleviation of Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms in Participants Treated with a 0.005% Tacrolimus Eye-Drop Solution.

Purpose: This randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover, double-blind trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tacrosolv, a novel 0.005% tacrolimus eye-drop solution, in adults with grass pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis. Methods: A total of 64 adult participants were randomized to receive 2.5 µg or 5 µg tacrolimus/eye/day or placebo treatment for 8 days, with grass pollen exposure on day 1 and day 8. After a 2-week washout period, placebo participants crossed over to Tacrosolv treatment and vice versa, with repeated treatment and exposure. During exposure, participants recorded ocular, nasal, and respiratory allergy symptoms every 15 minutes. The primary endpoint was the mean total ocular symptom score (TOSS) on day 8. Objective ocular safety parameters were assessed before, during, and after exposure. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. Results: On day 8, high-dose Tacrosolv reduced the TOSS compared to placebo towards the end of exposure (p<0.05 at time points 3 hours, 45 minutes and 4 hours). A 26% reduction in baseline adjusted TOSS from day 1 to day 8 was observed in participants treated with high-dose Tacrosolv, whereas placebo-treated participants showed no difference in TOSS between day 1 and day 8. Nasal symptoms were reduced on both day 1 and day 8 in participants treated with high-dose Tacrosolv (p<0.05). No safety concerns were raised. All adverse events were resolved within the study period. Conclusion: High-dose Tacrosolv is safe and effective for alleviating symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Trial Registration: NCT04532710; EudraCT No. 2019-002847-62.

Forced randomization: the what, why, and how.

BACKGROUND: When running a randomized controlled trial (RCT), a clinical site may face a situation when an eligible trial participant is to be randomized to the treatment that is not available at the site. In this case, there are two options: not to enroll the participant, or, without disclosing to the site, allocate the participant to a treatment arm with drug available at the site using a built-in feature of the interactive response technology (IRT). In the latter case, one has employed a "forced randomization" (FR). There seems to be an industry-wide consensus that using FR can be acceptable in confirmatory trials provided there are "not too many" instances of forcing. A better understanding of statistical properties of FR is warranted. METHODS: We described four different IRT configurations with or without FR and illustrated them using a simple example. We discussed potential merits of FR and outlined some relevant theoretical risks and risk mitigation strategies. We performed a search using Cortellis Regulatory Intelligence database (IDRAC) ( www.cortellis.com ) to understand the prevalence of FR in clinical trial practice. We also proposed a structured template for development and evaluation of randomization designs featuring FR and showcased an application of this template for a hypothetical multi-center 1:1 RCT under three experimental settings ("base case", "slower recruitment", and "faster recruitment") to explore the effect of four different IRT configurations in combination with three different drug supply/re-supply strategies on some important operating characteristics of the trial. We also supplied the Julia code that can be used to reproduce our simulation results and generate additional results under user-specified experimental scenarios. RESULTS: FR can eliminate refusals to randomize patients, which can cause frustration for patients and study site personnel, improve the study logistics, drug supply management, cost-efficiency, and recruitment time. Nevertheless, FR carries some potential risks that should be reviewed at the study planning stage and, ideally, prospectively addressed through risk mitigation planning. The Cortellis search identified only 9 submissions that have reported the use of FR; typically, the FR option was documented in IRT specifications. Our simulation evidence showed that under the considered realistic experimental settings, the percentage of FR is expected to be low. When FR with backfilling was used in combination with high re-supply strategy, the final treatment imbalance was negligibly small, the proportion of patients not randomized due to the lack of drug supply was close to zero, and the time to complete recruitment was shortened compared to the case when FR was not allowed. The drug overage was primarily determined by the intensity of the re-supply strategy and to a smaller extent by the presence or absence of the FR feature in IRT. CONCLUSION: FR with a carefully chosen drug supply/re-supply strategy can result in quantifiable improvements in the patients' and site personnel experience, trial logistics and efficiency while preventing an undesirable refusal to randomize a patient and a consequential unblinding at the site. FR is a useful design feature of multi-center RCTs provided it is properly planned for and carefully implemented.

Molecular targets and strategies in the development of nucleic acid cancer vaccines: from shared to personalized antigens.

Recent breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapies have emphasized the importance of harnessing the immune system for treating cancer. Vaccines, which have traditionally been used to promote protective immunity against pathogens, are now being explored as a method to target cancer neoantigens. Over the past few years, extensive preclinical research and more than a hundred clinical trials have been dedicated to investigating various approaches to neoantigen discovery and vaccine formulations, encouraging development of personalized medicine. Nucleic acids (DNA and mRNA) have become particularly promising platform for the development of these cancer immunotherapies. This shift towards nucleic acid-based personalized vaccines has been facilitated by advancements in molecular techniques for identifying neoantigens, antigen prediction methodologies, and the development of new vaccine platforms. Generating these personalized vaccines involves a comprehensive pipeline that includes sequencing of patient tumor samples, data analysis for antigen prediction, and tailored vaccine manufacturing. In this review, we will discuss the various shared and personalized antigens used for cancer vaccine development and introduce strategies for identifying neoantigens through the characterization of gene mutation, transcription, translation and post translational modifications associated with oncogenesis. In addition, we will focus on the most up-to-date nucleic acid vaccine platforms, discuss the limitations of cancer vaccines as well as provide potential solutions, and raise key clinical and technical considerations in vaccine development.

The I2 Test for Selection Bias Risk Assessment in Single Trials: Recommended Simulated Comparator Trial (SCT) Settings.

Selection bias in clinical trials is a form of systematic error and may be detected using the I² test with a 0/>0% threshold (bias: I² > 0%, no bias: I² = 0%). The test operates on the premise that effective randomisation eliminates in-between study heterogeneity beyond the play of chance in a baseline variable meta-analysis of all the trial's baseline variables. Since the I² statistic was originally designed to measure in-between study heterogeneity in meta-analyses, the test requires the generation of at least two simulated comparator trials (SCTs). During this process, three parameters are set: SCT sample size (NSCT), the minimum-maximum range of random values (RSCT), and the number of generated SCTs to be used (SCTN). Each of these parameters influences the 0/>0% threshold of the resulting I² point estimate, thereby affecting the test's sensitivity in indicating a positive result. The purpose of this technical report is to highlight the effect that SCT parameters have on the test's accuracy and to recommend appropriate parameter settings.

Effect of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane on Erections during Narcosis in Transurethral Surgery: The PENIS Trial.

Penile erection is unwanted during transurethral interventions as it may be associated with adverse events such as impaired access, prolonged operation time, abortion of the procedure, or a need for ancillary measures to reach penis flaccidity, such as intracorporeal injection of vasoactive drugs. In recent years, anesthesia with propofol has been favored over sevoflurane for environmental reasons. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no prospective randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of general narcosis medications on the risk of such unwanted penile erections during transurethral surgery. To fill this gap, we have planned a prospective, double-blind (surgeon and patient), single-center, randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome is the occurrence of an intraoperative penile erection. The secondary outcomes are related to the impact of the primary outcome on the surgery, such as changes in operative strategy or operation duration, abortion of the procedure, and adverse events. The plan is to randomize 200 patients undergoing transurethral surgery to receive general anesthesia with either propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion criteria are men aged <75 yr with an International Index of Erectile Function-5 score of ≥12 points. All men fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be asked to participate. Exclusion criteria are patient characteristics associated with a higher risk of complications with the use of either propofol or sevoflurane. Randomization and treatment allocation will occur after patients give consent. The results will be statistically analyzed using a logistic regression model. This research has received ethical clearance from the local ethics committee (KEK code 2023-01682). The trial is registered on the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP000005681) and on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT06378645).

Denosumab stimulates spermatogenesis in infertile men with preserved Sertoli cell capacity.

Sperm production depends on proper Sertoli-germ cell interaction, and we hypothesized that receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) activity in Sertoli cells may influence spermatogenesis. Treatment with the RANKL inhibitor denosumab, normally used to treat osteoporosis, increased testicular weight, inhibin B, and germ cell proliferation in ex vivo testis cultures and in vivo in a humanized RANKL mouse. The effect on germ cell proliferation was positively associated with baseline serum concentrations of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH). In accordance, denosumab increased germ cell proliferation in ex vivo human testis cultures with low/moderate but not severe impairment of Sertoli cell function. In a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, denosumab had no effect on semen quality but increased sperm concentration in a subgroup of infertile men with serum AMH ≥38 pmol/L at baseline. In conclusion, high serum AMH may increase the probability of a beneficial response to denosumab treatment in infertile men, thus suggesting a possible venue for precision medicine in male infertility.

Efficacy of 100% autologous platelet-rich plasma and 100% autologous serum in dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The 0bjective is to compare treatment effects between undiluted autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous serum (AS) in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-centre, randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted. 96 adult DED patients with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score of ≥23 and/or Oxford staining grade of ≥2 were randomised to receive either 100% APRP (n=48) or 100% AS (n=48) for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included OSDI Score and ocular surface staining measured by Oxford grading scale at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fluorescein tear break-up time, Schirmer's test, meibum quality and expressibility, and adverse events. The 95% CI for the mean difference in OSDI scores between groups was estimated to assess non-inferiority of the OSDI score at a prespecified margin of 4.18 points. RESULTS: At week 4, there was no significant difference in decreased OSDI scores between groups, with the mean difference (100% APRP-100% AS) of 1.41 (95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299). The upper limit was less than the prespecified margin, indicating non-inferiority of 100% APRP vs 100% AS. The probabilities of achieving an Oxford grade 0-1 after treatment were not significantly different between groups, with an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.25, 1.52, p=0.288). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed between groups. CONCLUSION: In the short-term, 100% APRP was not inferior to 100% AS in reducing dry eye symptoms and ocular surface staining in moderate-to-severe DED. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04683796.

Control of myopia using diffusion optics spectacle lenses: 4-year results of a multicentre randomised controlled, efficacy and safety study (CYPRESS).

AIMS: To evaluate the myopia control efficacy of Diffusion Optics Technology (DOT) spectacle lenses in children over a 4-year treatment period. METHODS: CYPRESS Part 1 (NCT03623074) was a 3-year multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-masked trial comparing two investigational spectacle lens DOT designs (Test 1, Test 2) and standard single vision Control lenses in 256 North American children aged 6-10 years. Children completing Part 1 (n=200) were invited to enrol in CYPRESS Part 2 (NCT04947735) for an additional 1-year period. In Part 2, Test 1 (n=35) and Control groups (n=42) continued with their original lens assignment and the Test 2 group (n=21) were crossed over to Test 1 (DOT 0.2) lenses. The co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in axial length (AL) and cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (cSER). RESULTS: Test 1 spectacle lenses demonstrated superiority to the Control in both co-primary endpoints: with a difference between means (Test 1-Control) of -0.13 mm for AL (p=0.018) and 0.33 D for cSER (p=0.008) in Part 1 and -0.05 mm for AL (p=0.038) and 0.13 D for cSER (p=0.043) in Part 2. Comparing treatment effects in Part 1 and 2 suggests that COVID-19 public health restrictions negatively impacted treatment efficacy in study years 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: DOT 0.2 spectacle lenses are safe and effective at reducing myopia progression, with additional benefit evident in year 4 of wear. These results support the hypothesis that a mild reduction in retinal contrast can slow myopia progression in young children. The unprecedented disruption in participant schooling and lifestyle during the COVID-19 pandemic may have depressed treatment efficacy in Part 1.