Effectiveness and safety of combined nimotuzumab and S-1 chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer in malnourished and elderly patients: A prospective phase II study.

Objective: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, this treatment is associated with substantial toxicity, and most malnourished or elderly patients are unable to complete this therapy. Therefore, there is a need for a more suitable radiotherapy combination regimen for this population. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen comprising chemotherapy with nimotuzumab and S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy for patients with fragile locally advanced esophageal cancer with a high Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score. Methods: Eligible patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma who had an NRS-2002 score of 2 or higher were enrolled. They were treated with S-1 and nimotuzumab with concurrent radiotherapy, followed by surgery or definitive radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the locoregional control (LRC) rate. Results: A total of 55 patients who met the study criteria were enrolled. After completion of treatment, surgery was performed in 15 patients and radiotherapy was continued in 40 patients. The median follow-up period was 33.3 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 31.4-35.1)] months. The LRC rate was 77.2% (95% CI, 66.6%-89.4%) at 1 year in the entire population. The overall survival (OS) rate and event-free survival (EFS) rate were 57.5% and 51.5% at 3 years, respectively. Surgery was associated with better LRC [hazard ratio (HR)=0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.70; P=0.015], OS (HR=0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.80; P=0.024), and EFS (HR=0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.75; P=0.013). Most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2, and no severe adverse events occurred. Conclusions: For malnourished or elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab and S-1 is effective and has a good safety profile.

Survival outcome of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients >75 years of age.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is surgery-based treatment; however, it is unclear whether esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy is suitable for older patients. This retrospective study aimed to identify the treatment outcomes of surgery-based therapy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an initial treatment for older patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: Data from 434 patients who received radical treatment for resectable, locally advanced ESCC were collected from January 2011 to December 2020. Of the patients >75 years of age, 49 underwent radical esophagectomy and 26 received dCRT. Survival was compared between the surgery and dCRT groups. RESULTS: The mean ages of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 77.3 and 78.8 years, respectively. Differences in overall survival (OS) between the two groups were not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 66.2%, dCRT 55.7%, p = 0.236). Multivariate analysis for OS showed a hazard ratio of 1.229 for dCRT versus surgery (90% confidence interval 0.681-2.217). OS did not differ between the groups in any of the performance statuses. For patients who were able to receive chemotherapy using fluorouracil and cisplatin, OS tended to be better in the surgery group, but the difference was not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 68.1%, dCRT 51.8%, p = 0.117). CONCLUSIONS: There was no clear difference in survival outcome between surgery-based therapy and dCRT as an initial treatment for esophageal cancer in older patients. Either treatment may be an option for older patients.

Overall survival after definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is a potentially curative therapy for esophageal cancer. As indications for dCRT differ widely, it is challenging to draw conclusions on outcomes and survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) and recurrence patterns according to indications for treatment. Patients who underwent dCRT (50.4 Gy concomitant with carboplatin/paclitaxel) for esophageal cancer between 2012 and 2022 were identified. Indications for dCRT were: cervical tumor, irresectable disease, unfit for surgery, and patient and/or physician preference. The primary endpoint was OS calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients that completed the dCRT regimen, 30- and 90-day mortality, and disease recurrence. One hundred and fifty-seven patients were included (72.6% esophageal squamous cell carcinoma) with a median follow-up of 20 months (IQR 10.0-43.9). The full dCRT regimen was completed by 116 patients (73.9%). Thirty- and 90-day mortality were 2.5% and 8.3%, respectively. Median and 5-year OS for all patients were 22.9 months (95% CI 18.0-27.9) and 31.4%, respectively. The median OS per indication was 23.7 months (95% CI 6.5-40.8) for patients with cervical tumors, 10.9 months (95% 0.0-23.2) for irresectable disease, 28.2 months (95% CI 12.3-44.0) for unfit patients, and 22.9 months (95% CI 15.4-30.5) for patients' preference for dCRT (P = 0.11). Disease recurrence was observed in 74 patients (46%), located locoregionally (46%), distant (19%), or combined (35%). Patients who underwent dCRT had a 5-year OS of 31.4%, but OS differed according to indications for treatment with patients who had irresectable disease having the worst prognosis.

International Expert Consensus on Semantics of Multimodal Esophageal Cancer Treatment: Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in esophageal cancer treatment, including studies exploring active surveillance following chemoradiotherapy, have led to a need for clear terminology and definitions regarding different multimodal treatment options. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to reach worldwide consensus on the definitions and semantics of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment. METHODS: In total, 72 experts working in the field of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment were invited to participate in this Delphi study. The study comprised three Delphi surveys sent out by email and one online meeting. Input for the Delphi survey consisted of terminology obtained from a systematic literature search. Participants were asked to respond to open questions and to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed with different statements. Consensus was reached when there was ≥75% agreement among respondents. RESULTS: Forty-nine of 72 invited experts (68.1%) participated in the first online Delphi survey, 45 (62.5%) in the second survey, 21 (46.7%) of 45 in the online meeting, and 39 (86.7%) of 45 in the final survey. Consensus on neoadjuvant and definitive chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery was reached for 27 of 31 items (87%). No consensus was reached on follow-up after treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION(S): Consensus was reached on most statements regarding terminology and definitions of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment. Implementing uniform criteria facilitates comparison of studies and promotes international research collaborations.

Comparative efficacy and safety between endoscopic submucosal dissection, surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT1N0M0 esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection are the standard of care for cT1N0M0 esophageal cancer (EC), whereas definitive chemoradiotherapy (d-CRT) is a treatment option. Nevertheless, the comparative efficiency and safety of ESD, surgery and d-CRT for cT1N0M0 EC remain unclear. AIM: To compare the efficiency and safety of ESD, surgery and d-CRT for cT1N0M0 EC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the hospitalized data of a total of 472 consecutive patients with cT1N0M0 EC treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer center between 2017-2019 and followed up until October 30th, 2022. We analyzed demographic, medical recorded, histopathologic characteristics, imaging and endoscopic, and follow-up data. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze the difference of survival outcome by treatments. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to minimize potential confounding factors. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent ESD (n = 99) or surgery (n = 220) or d-CRT (n = 16) at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2017 to 2019. The median follow-up time for the ESD group, the surgery group, and the d-CRT group was 42.0 mo (95%CI: 35.0-60.2), 45.0 mo (95%CI: 34.0-61.75) and 32.5 mo (95%CI: 28.3-40.0), respectively. After adjusting for background factors using IPTW, the highest 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate were observed in the ESD group (3-year OS: 99.7% and 94.7% and 79.1%; and 3-year RFS: 98.3%, 87.4% and 79.1%, in the ESD, surgical, and d-CRT groups, respectively). There was no difference of severe complications occurring between the three groups (P ≥ 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment method, histology and depth of infiltration were independently associated with OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: For cT1N0M0 EC, ESD had better long-term survival and lower hospitalization costs than those who underwent d-CRT and surgery, with a similar rate of severe complications occurring.

Comparison of esophageal cancer survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains the gold standard for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer (EC); however, chemoradiotherapy without surgery has been recommended in specific cases. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyse the survival between surgeries after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with definitive chemoradiotherapy in order to provide a theoretical basis for clinically individualised differential treatment. We conducted an initial search of MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and Embase for English-only articles that compared treatment regimens and provided survival data. According to the final I2 value of the two survival indicators, the random effect model or fixed effect model was used to calculate the overall hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cochrane's Q test was used to judge the heterogeneity of the studies, and a funnel plot was used to evaluate for publication bias. A sensitivity analysis was performed to verify the stability of the included studies. A total of 38 studies involving 29161 patients (neoadjuvant therapy: 15401, definitive chemoradiotherapy: 13760) were included in the analysis. The final pooled results (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.67-0.82) showed a statistically significant increase in overall survival with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery compared with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine the effects of heterogeneity, additional treatment regimens, study types, and geographic regions, as well as histologic differences, complications, and recurrence, on the overall results. For people with esophageal cancer that can be removed, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery improves survival compared to definitive chemoradiotherapy. However, more research is needed to confirm these results and help doctors make decisions about treatment.

Induction immunochemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction immunochemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). We identified unresectable stage III NSCLC patients who received induction immunochemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoints. From February 2019 to August 2022, 158 patients were enrolled. Following the completion of induction immunochemotherapy, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 52.5% and 83.5%, respectively. The ORR of CRT was 73.5%, representing 68.4% of the total cohort. The median PFS was 17.8 months, and the median OS was 41.9 months, significantly higher than in patients who received CRT alone (p < 0.001). Patients with concurrent CRT demonstrated markedly improved PFS (p = 0.012) and OS (p = 0.017) than those undergoing sequential CRT. Additionally, those with a programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of 50% or higher showed significantly elevated ORRs (72.2% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.011) and superior OS (median 44.8 vs. 28.6 months, p = 0.004) compared to patients with PD-L1 expression below 50%. Hematologic toxicities were the primary severe adverse events (grade ≥ 3) encountered, with no unforeseen treatment-related toxicities. Thus, induction immunochemotherapy followed by definitive CRT demonstrated encouraging efficacy and tolerable toxicities for unresectable LA-NSCLC.

Treatment options for stage III-N2 pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a rare form of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) that shares similarities with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The optimal treatment for stage III-N2 PLELC remains controversial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective analysis from stage III-N2 PLELC patients between 2009 and 2022 in our center. The patients were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (G1, definitive chemoradiotherapy), Group 2 (G2, radical surgery plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy), and Group 3 (G3, radical surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy). RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in the study, with 34, 25, and 44 patients in G1, G2, and G3, respectively. The median follow-up time was 47.4 months. The overall median PFS was 66.6 months, with 3-year PFS and 3-year OS rates of 66.0% and 92.4%, respectively, for all patients. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant difference in PFS between G1 and G2 (p = 0.354), while both groups exhibited significantly longer PFS than G3 (p < 0.001; p = 0.039). Similarly, no significant difference in OS was observed between G1 and G2 (p = 0.649), but both tended to demonstrate improved OS compared to G3 (p = 0.081; p = 0.092). Only one case of grade 3 radiation esophagitis was observed in G1, and no grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage III-N2 PLELC have a favorable prognosis, with radiotherapy playing a crucial role in treatment. Both definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery followed by chemoradiotherapy demonstrate favorable efficacy and manageable toxicity.

The Prognostic Value of Sequential 18 F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in Outcomes of Upper-Third Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Definitive Chemoradiotherapy.

Objective The aim of this study is to determine prognostic values of sequential 18 F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods Forty locally advanced ESCC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) who received pre-treatment 18 F-FDG PET/CT (PET1) and 3-months post-treatment 18 F-FDG PET/CT (PET2) were enrolled in the prospective study. 18 F-FDG PET parameters of the primary tumor including maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated on PET delineated primary tumor. Using Kaplan-Meier curves to estimated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local-regional control (LRC). Cox regression analysis was performed to find significant prognostic factors for survival. Results With a median follow-up of 13.5 months, the 4-year OS, PFS, and LRC rates were 67.3%, 52.6%, and 53.4% respectively. Patients with MTV 2 > 5.7 had lower OS, PFS, and LRC rates than the lower MTV 2 group (p < 0.05). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that MTV2 was a significant prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and LRC (p < 0.05). Conclusion MTV parameter of sequential 18 F-FDG PET/CT could be used as a prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and LRC in locally advanced ESCC patients treated with dCRT.

Salvage Surgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Literature Review.

(1) Background: Salvation surgery for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is exceptionally performed, and only a few cases are published. (2) Methods: There are 6 publications that present 17 cases of salvation surgery for SCLC-the salvation surgery was performed in the context of modern clearly established protocols for SCLC and after including SCLC in the TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) staging in 2010. (3) Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, the estimated overall survival (OS) was 86 months. The median estimated 2-year survival was 92%, and the median estimated 5-year survival was 66%. (4) Conclusion: Salvage surgery for SCLC is a relatively new and extremely uncommon concept and represents an alternative to second-line chemotherapy. It is valuable because it may offer a reasonable treatment for selected patients, good local control, and a favorable survival outcome.

Association Between Lymphopenia and Survival Outcomes in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients Receiving Combined Immunotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir and survival outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, as well as to explore clinical characteristics and dosimetric parameters that affect ALC nadir during CRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ESCC (n = 602) who underwent definitive CRT were analyzed, of whom 166 received combined anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and CRT. Changes in ALC and survival were compared between patients with and without immunotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the effects of confounding factors. Low ALC was defined as nadir of <0.33 × 103 cells/µL during CRT (top tertile). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify predictors of low ALC nadir. RESULTS: Patients with immunotherapy had significantly higher ALC in the first 3 weeks during CRT and higher ALC nadir than those without. Overall survival was more favorable in patients with immunotherapy both before and after PSM. After a median follow-up of 12.1 months, patients with low ALC during CRT had a worse progression-free survival (PFS) (P = .026). In multivariate analysis, low ALC remained a significant prognostic factor for PFS. Planning target volume (PTV) and heart V5 were revealed to be independent predictors of low ALC. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy to definitive CRT could mitigate the decline of ALC during radiotherapy and might prolong survival. Low ALC nadir was correlated to worse PFS, larger PTV, and higher heart V5 in patients receiving combined immunotherapy and CRT.

Preservation of remnant esophagus during total pharyngolaryngectomy in a patient with previous subtotal esophagectomy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: With the improved survival rate of patients with esophageal cancer, secondary cancers, including pharyngolaryngeal cancer, have become a problem. Phanryngolaryngeal cancer surgery often requires esophagogastric anastomosis resection in patients with a previous history of subtotal esophagectomy. Owing to adhesions, especially surrounding the esophagogastric anastomosis, caused by the initial surgery, the second surgery might cause postoperative complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old man was diagnosed with early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and underwent endoscopic mucosal dissection. However, the histopathological depth of the tumor was pT1b, and additional treatment was required. After administration of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, he underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy and retrosternum reconstruction via a gastric tube (pT1N3M0 stage III). Eight months after the first surgery, tumor recurrences were observed at the anastomosis and left cervical lymph node. Definitive chemoradiotherapy was performed for the recurrences, and complete response was achieved. Seven months after chemoradiotherapy, he was diagnosed with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the right piriform fossa (cT2N2bM0 stage IVA), and salvage surgery was chosen as treatment. The surgical findings revealed strong adhesion around the remnant esophagus, which was difficult to dissect from surrounding tissue and was associated with a risk of breaking of the anastomosis. However, indocyanine green fluorescence imaging findings indicated sufficient blood flow to preserve the remnant esophagus, including the anastomosis, even after the interruption of blood flow from the proximal side of the esophagus by total pharyngolaryngectomy. Finally, approximately 4 cm of the remnant esophagus was preserved, and the free jejunum reconstruction with cervical vascular anastomosis was performed. Moreover, the patient was discharged without complications on postoperative day 38. After 10 months of the second surgery, a metastatic lymph node was observed in the right neck. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy were administered, and the patient is alive and under treatment 1.5 years after the second surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Blood supply to the remnant cervical esophagus was thought to be from the gastric conduit over the anastomosis and surrounding capillaries. Thus, the preservation of the remnant esophagus can be considered in total pharyngolaryngectomy even after < 2 years of esophagectomy by blood flow evaluation using indocyanine green fluorescence.

Case of robot-assisted salvage surgery for esophageal cancer with a mediastinal fistula after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Salvage surgery for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is effective, but it is associated with a high rate of perioperative complications. The indications for robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) are expanding. However, there are few reports of salvage RAMIE. A 73-year-old man was referred to our hospital for residual esophageal cancer with a mediastinal fistula after dCRT. The perioperative diagnosis was T3N1M0-Stage III, and the salvage RAMIE was performed. Although the dissection was difficult due to fibrosis caused by dCRT and the esophageal mediastinal fistula, RAMIE was performed safely with no complications. Multiple features of RAMIE contributed to stable surgery. The monopolar dissection is effective for hard scar tissue caused by CRT and inflammation.

Salvage Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: A Case Report.

The advantages of salvage esophagectomy through robotic-assisted surgery for patients with clinically diagnosed tumor invasion of adjacent vital organs (cT4b) or patients with scar tissue from definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) are still only rarely reported. A man in his 60s with middle thoracic esophageal cancer (cT4b [left main bronchus] N1 M0 cStage IIIC) received dCRT (60 Gy). After the chemoradiotherapy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a residual primary tumor, and we performed robotic-assisted thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction via a retrosternal route with three-field lymphadenectomy. Although it was difficult to dissect the tumor from adjacent organs, especially the left main bronchus and left inferior pulmonary vein, due to loss of the dissecting layer and scarring, R0 surgery was achieved. With robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, the high-magnification, high-resolution, and three-dimensional images; the stable surgical field with full countertraction made with the robotic arm forceps, which were readily adjusted; and the stable motion of the robotic arm without physiological tremor are considerable advantages for salvage esophagectomy for cT4b tumors. It goes without saying that sufficient experience with robot-assisted surgery and sufficient understanding and surgical skill in esophageal cancer surgery under suitable surgical indications and timing are required to make use of these advantages.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Versus Definitive Chemoradiotherapy With Salvage Surgery as Needed: The Study Protocol for the Randomized Controlled NEEDS Trial.

Background: The globally dominant treatment with curative intent for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with subsequent esophagectomy. This multimodal treatment leads to around 60% overall 5-year survival, yet with impaired post-surgical quality of life. Observational studies indicate that curatively intended chemoradiotherapy, so-called definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) followed by surveillance of the primary tumor site and regional lymph node stations and surgery only when needed to ensure local tumor control, may lead to similar survival as nCRT with surgery, but with considerably less impairment of quality of life. This trial aims to demonstrate that dCRT, with selectively performed salvage esophagectomy only when needed to achieve locoregional tumor control, is non-inferior regarding overall survival, and superior regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL), compared to nCRT followed by mandatory surgery, in patients with operable, locally advanced ESCC. Methods: This is a pragmatic open-label, randomized controlled phase III, multicenter trial with non-inferiority design with regard to the primary endpoint overall survival and a superiority hypothesis for the experimental intervention dCRT with regard to the main secondary endpoint global HRQOL one year after randomization. The control intervention is nCRT followed by preplanned surgery and the experimental intervention is dCRT followed by surveillance and salvage esophagectomy only when needed to secure local tumor control. A target sample size of 1200 randomized patients is planned in order to reach 462 events (deaths) during follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04460352.

A Nutrition-Related Factor-Based Risk Stratification for Exploring the Clinical Benefits in the Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: No study has reported the risk stratification of BMI and PNI in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). This study aimed to construct a risk stratification to guide the treatment of ESCC following dCRT. Methods: A total of 1,068 patients with locally advanced ESCC who received dCRT were retrospectively analyzed. The impacts of clinicopathological factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Besides, the novel prognostic indices of pre-therapeutic nutritional index (PTNI) and prognostic index (PI) were developed. Results: The median follow-up period of OS and PFS were 22.9 and 17.4 months, respectively. The high body mass index (BMI) group had better 5-year OS and PFS (36.4 and 34.0%) than the low BMI group (18.8 and 17.2%). The high prognostic nutritional index (PNI) group also had better 5-year OS and PFS (33.4 and 30.9%) than the low PNI group (17.5 and 17.2%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that BMI and PNI were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Based on nutritional indices, patients were categorized into the low-risk (PTNI = 1), medium-risk (PTNI = 2), and high-risk (PTNI = 3) groups with 5-year OS rates of 38.5, 18.9, 17.5%, respectively (p < 0.001) and 5-year PFS rates of 35.8, 17.6, 16.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Besides, we also constructed a prognostic index (PI) for OS and PFS which was calculated based on statistically significant factors for predicting OS and PFS. The results revealed that the high-risk group had worse OS and PFS than the low-risk group (p < 0.001). Finally, RCS analysis demonstrated a non-linear relationship between the PNI, BMI, and survival for patients with ESCC. The death hazard of PNI and BMI sharply decreased to 41.8 and 19.7. Conclusion: The decreased pre-therapeutic BMI and PNI levels were associated with a worse survival outcome. BMI and PNI are readily available and can be used to stratify risk factors for locally advanced ESCC patients undergoing dCRT. The novel risk stratification may help to evaluate patients' pre-therapeutic status and guide dCRT for locally advanced ESCC patients.

Significance of intratreatment tumor volume change during chemoradiotherapy for potentially resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of tumor response assessment at a twentieth fraction of radiotherapy when predicting the survival of patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: A total of 123 ESCC patients with clinical stages II to IVa were enrolled and analyzed. Gross tumor volume (GTV) of the esophagus (GTVe) and GTV of the metastatic lymph node (GTVnd) were manually contoured by at least 2 senior professional radiotherapists on the simulated computed tomography (CT) images in a process that followed the delineating rules for ESCC. RESULTS: The GTVe reduction ratio (RR) and GTVnd RR were calculated based on the evaluation of the tumor volume at a twentieth fraction of radiotherapy. Univariate analysis showed that GTVe and GTVnd before treatment, and GTVe RR and GTVnd RR at the twentieth fraction of radiotherapy were all significantly associated with complete clinical response (cCR) and overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS). CONCLUSIONS: The GTVe RR ≥27.92% and GTVnd RR ≥21.49% at a twentieth fraction of radiotherapy are positive predictive factors of LRRFS, and according to multivariate analysis, only GTVe RR at the twentieth fraction of radiotherapy ≥27.92% is prognostic for a favorable OS.

A retrospective study comparing definitive chemoradiotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who were downstaged after neochemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is extremely poor. Two distinct therapeutic options are currently available for T4 esophageal cancers: neochemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRT-S) and definitive chemoradiotherapy (D-CRT). This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics of T4 ESCC in Chinese patients and compare the survival between the two therapeutic options. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 125 patients with clinically unresectable T4 ESCC in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 2010 to December 2020. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and associated factors were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 106 of 125 T4 ESCC patients were downstaged of the tumor by neoadjuvant CRT. Among 106 patients, 32 patients underwent CRT-S, and 74 patients underwent D-CRT. Patients in the CRT-S group had a higher OS (20.4 months vs. un-reached median OS, p = 0.037) and PFS (8.6 months vs. 21.0 months, p = 0.008) than those in the D-CRT group. In multivariate analysis, treatment was an independent predictor of PFS. After propensity score matching (PSM), 50 patients (CRT-S = 25; D-CRT = 25) were matched. Among these 50 patients, patients in the CRT-S group had a higher OS (15.6 months vs. un-reached median OS, p = 0.025) and PFS (7.2 months vs. 18.8 months, p = 0.026) than those in the D-CRT group. In multivariate analysis, treatment was an independent predictor for PFS. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that CRT-S was superior to D-CRT for T4 ESCC patients who were downstaged by neo-CRT with respect to longer OS and PFS. Randomized controlled trials involving large population samples are needed to define the standard treatment for T4 ESCC.

Survival benefit of surgery in patients with clinical T4 esophageal cancer who achieved complete or partial response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the long-term survival of patients with cT4 esophageal cancer (EC) and whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy plus surgery (nCRT/RT + S) is superior to definitive CRT(dCRT)/RT in terms of survival in cT4 EC downstaged after nCRT/RT. Summary background data: Treatment options for cT4 EC include dCRT/RT and nCRT/RT + S, but it is not clear whether the latter provides survival benefit in patients downstaged after nCRT/RT. Methods: From 2002 to 2017, 726 patients with cT4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR) or partial response (PR) after 4-week RT (median dose, 40.7 Gy) and considered fit for surgery were offered esophagectomy. Of the 726 patients, 308 (42.4%) achieved cCR/PR, while 74 patients received subsequent surgery (nCRT/RT + S group), 234 patients received dCRT/RT. Results: Median follow-up was 58 months. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates for all patients were 33.3% and 35.6%, respectively. The corresponding OS and PFS rates were 54.8% and 48.5% in the nCRT/RT + S group versus 30.0% and 22.1% in the dCRT/RT group (both p < 0.0001). After adjusting the confounding variables with inverse probability of treatment weighting, the adjusted 3-year OS rates were 50.4% in the nCRT/RT + S group versus 50.8% in the dCRT/RT group (p = 0.15). However, the adjusted 3-year PFS rates were significantly different between the two groups (49.0% and versus 38.3%, p = 0.004). Postoperative complications occurred in 18 (24.3%) patients. Conclusion: The long-term survival of cT4 ESCC was improved after the use of three-dimensional CRT. In cT4, EC responded to nCRT/RT, surgery improves PFS but not OS.

Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT-Derived Parameters in Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Locally Advanced Upper Third Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether standard uptake values (SUVs) of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT were the surrogate parameters for predicting the outcomes in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and received definitive chemoradiotherapy. 18F-FDG metabolic parameters including SUVmax, SUVmean, SULpeak, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of primary tumor were calculated. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of FDG PET/CT-derived parameters that associated with treatment response. Estimating progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier methods. Univariate and multivariate analysis for PFS and OS was performed using Cox regression. Results: Complete response was achieved in 38.3%. The 4-year OS and PFS rates were 48.6% and 44.4%, respectively. SUVmean with a cutoff value of 6.1 could predict complete response with sensitivity of 69.6%, specificity of 78.4%, and accuracy of 75%. Cox multi-factor regression analyses revealed SUVmean > 6.1 as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 6.74, p = 0.02) and PFS (HR = 6.53, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study suggests that SUVmean of the primary tumor in pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT may be used as an independent predictor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.