RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances remain one of the most common complications occurring post TAVI. We aim to determine the predictors of cardiac conduction disturbances after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and propose a relevant predictive model. We included 70 consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS who underwent TAVI using the self-expanding valve Evolut R or the balloon expandable Sapien XT valve. All patients were subjected to electrocardiographic evaluation pre- and post-TAVI and at 30 days. Clinical, echocardiographic, CT-derived, and procedural parameters were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Conduction disturbances affected 28 patients (40%): 16 patients (22.9 %) developed Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB), 7 patients (10%) experienced transient Complete Heart Block (CHB), and 5 patients (7.1%) experienced permanent CHB requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI). We classified predictors into preprocedural and procedural predictors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of pre-procedural predictors showed that the presence of basal septal calcification is the most powerful independent predictor (OR: 28.63, 95% CI: 4.59-178.68, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for pre and post procedural predictors showed that the relationship between depth of implantation at the septum and membranous septum expressed in percentage (sDIMS) with cut-off >70.42% is the most powerful independent procedural predictor (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.2, p 0.006). CONCLUSION: Conduction disturbances remain a common complication of TAVI. Presence of basal septal calcification is a non-modifiable risk factor that increase patient propensity of development such complication after TAVI. A depth of implantation exceeding 70% of the membranous septal length has been found to strongly predict conduction disturbances post TAVI. sDIMS can be used in planning the depth of implantation to reduce incidence of conduction disturbances post TAVI.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mitral valve-in-valve (ViV) is associated with suboptimal hemodynamics and rare left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether device position and asymmetry are associated with these outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences) mitral ViV included in the VIVID (Valve-in-Valve International Data) Registry were studied. Clinical endpoints are reported according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions. Residual mitral valve stenosis was defined as mean gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Depth of implantation (percentage of transcatheter heart valve [THV] atrial to the bioprosthesis ring) and asymmetry (ratio of 2 measures of THV height) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients meeting the criteria for optimal core lab evaluation were studied (age 74 ± 11.6 years; 61.9% female; STS score = 8.3 ± 7.1). Mean asymmetry was 6.2% ± 4.4%. Mean depth of implantation was 19.0% ± 10.3% atrial. Residual stenosis was common (50%; mean gradient 5.0 ± 2.6 mm Hg). LVOT obstruction occurred in 7 cases (3.2%). Implantation depth was not a predictor of residual stenosis (OR: 1.19 [95% CI: 0.92-1.55]; P = 0.184), but more atrial implantation was protective against LVOT obstruction (0.7% vs 7.1%; P = 0.009; per 10% atrial, OR: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.24-0.98]; P = 0.044). Asymmetry was found to be an independent predictor of residual stenosis (per 10% increase, OR: 2.30 [95% CI: 1.10-4.82]; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Valve stenosis is common after mitral ViV. Asymmetry was associated with residual stenosis. Depth of implantation on its own was not associated with residual stenosis but was associated with LVOT obstruction. Technical considerations to reduce postdeployment THV asymmetry should be considered.