Awake reduction of hangman's fracture: An era of dexmedetomidine.

Hangman's fracture is a kind of unstable cervical spine injury which should be treated promptly to avoid life threatening consequences. Advanced neurological monitoring is essential during surgical intrervention. Resource limited setting, where advanced monitors like SSEP and MEP are not available makes it challenging to assess proper reduction of cervical spine without neurological compromise. Dexmedetomidine proved to be very useful drug to assess the neurological status intra operatively by awake sedation.

Effects of intramuscular alfaxalone and dexmedetomidine alone and combined on ocular, electroretinographic, and cardiorespiratory parameters in normal cats.

Background: This study aimed to determine the effects of intramuscular (IM) administration of alfaxalone with or without dexmedetomidine on short electroretinography (ERG), ocular parameters and cardiorespiratory in healthy cats. Methods: Eight healthy female spayed cats were treated with three sedation protocols: IM administration of 5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (DEX), 5 mg/kg alfaxalone (ALF), and 5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine plus 5 mg/kg alfaxalone (DEX + ALF). The washout period after each treatment was 2 weeks. Physiological parameters, time metrics, intraocular pressure (IOP), Schirmer tear test 1 (STT-1) and a short ERG protocol were recorded. For age data, weight data, time metrics and ERG data, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posterior comparisons were performed. For physiological parameters, IOP and STT-1 data, two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni posterior comparisons were performed. Statistical significance was set at a p-value <0.05. Results: IOPs were increased in all three groups compared to baseline and showed no significant differences among three groups at any time point. STT-1 values were decreased significantly during the process. Significant differences were noticed between a-wave amplitude in the dark-adapted response between DEX and ALF, and a-wave amplitude in light-adapted response between ALF and DEX + ALF. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of three sedation protocols for short ERG recording in cats. All these treatments resulted in increased IOP values and reduced STT-1 values. But baseline data of ERG was not obtained as a blank control in cats.

[Effects of Dexmedetomidine on the Recovery Quality of Donors Undergoing Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy]. / å³ç¾Žæ‰˜å’ªå®šå¯¹è ¹è ”é•œä¾›è‚èŽ·å–æœ¯ä¾›è€ è‹é†’æœŸæ¢å¤è´¨é‡çš„å½±å“.

Objective: To investigate the effects of intraoperative intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on the recovery quality of donors undergoing pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy. Methods: A total of 56 liver donors who were going to undergo scheduled pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups, a DEX group ( n=28) and a control group ( n=28). Donors in the DEX group received DEX infusion at a dose of 1 µg/kg over 15 minutes through a continuous pump, which was followed by DEX at 0.4 µg/(kg·h) until the disconnection of the portal branch. Donors in the control group were given an equal volume of 0.9% normal saline at the same infusion rate and over the same period of time as those of the dex infusion in the DEX group. The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation (EA). The Aono's Four-point Scale (AFPS) score was used to assess EA. The secondary observation indicators included intraoperative anesthesia and surgery conditions, spontaneous respiration recovery time, recovery time, extubation time, scores for the Ramsay Sedation Scale, the incidence of chills, numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain, and blood pressure and heart rate after extubation. Results: The incidence of EA was 10.7% and 39.3% in the DEX group and the control group, respectively, and the incidence of EA was significantly lower in the DEX group than that in the control group ( P=0.014). The APFS scores after extubation in the DEX group were lower than those in the control group (1 [1, 1] vs. 2 [1, 3], P=0.005). Compared to the control group, the dosages of intraoperative propofol and remifentanil were significantly reduced in the DEX group ( P<0.05). During the recovery period, the number of donors requiring additional boluses of analgesia, the blood pressure, and the heart rate were all lower in the DEX group than those in the control group ( P<0.05). No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the spontaneous respiration recovery time, recovery time, extubation time, the incidence of chills, NRS score, scores for the Ramsay Sedation Scale, and the length-of-stay in postanesthesia care unit (PACU) ( P>0.05). Conclusion: DEX can reduce the incidence of EA after pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy and improve the quality of recovery without prolonging postoperative recovery time or extubation time.

Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil in intravenous controlled analgesia after Salter osteotomy in children.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on postoperative analgesia in developmental hip dislocation in children after Salter osteotomy. Methods: The clinical data of 98 children with developmental hip dislocation, who underwent Salter osteotomy in our center between January 2020 and February 2023, were selected. The children were randomly divided into four groups based on the application of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (sufentanil + granisetron ± dexmedetomidine). All children received 1 µg/kg/day of sufentanil and 3 mg of granisetron. Group A did not receive dexmedetomidine, and Groups B, C, and D received 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 µg/kg/day of dexmedetomidine, respectively. The pain indicators and immune factor levels of children in each group were compared. Results: The heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) 2 h after operation in Groups C and D were significantly lower than those in Groups A and B (P < 0.05). The pain scores decreased over time after treatment in all groups. When compared at the same time point, children in Group D had the lowest pain scores, which were significantly lower than the other three groups (P < 0.05). The total consumption of sufentanil in Groups C and D was significantly lower than that in Group A (P < 0.05). On the first day after surgery, the children in Group D had lower levels of serum adrenocorticotropic hormone, interleukin-6, and corticosterone than those in Group A (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Administration of 1.0 µg/kg/day of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil in intravenous controlled analgesia after Salter osteotomy for developmental hip dislocation in children has a better analgesic effect, less consumption of sufentanil, and low incidence of opioid adverse reactions.

Effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine on delayed graft function following renal transplant: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist with sedative and analgesic effects, has been suggested in recent studies to possess renoprotective properties. Dexmedetomidine may reduce the incidence of delayed graft function and contribute to effective pain control post-renal transplantation. The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess whether dexmedetomidine decreases the occurrence of delayed graft function in renal transplant patients. METHODS: Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were comprehensively searched from their inception until March 2023. The inclusion criteria covered all Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing dexmedetomidine to control in adult patients undergoing renal transplant surgery. Exclusions comprised case series and case reports. RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving a total of 1,358 patients met the eligibility criteria for data synthesis. Compared to the control group, the dexmedetomidine group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of delayed graft function (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.97, p = 0.03, GRADE: Very low, I2 = 0%). Dexmedetomidine also significantly prolonged time to initiation of rescue analgesia (MD = 6.73, 95% CI 2.32-11.14, p = 0.003, GRADE: Very low, I2 = 93%) and reduced overall morphine consumption after renal transplant (MD = -5.43, 95% CI -7.95 to -2.91, p < 0.0001, GRADE: Very low, I2 = 0%). The dexmedetomidine group exhibited a significant decrease in heart rate (MD = -8.15, 95% CI -11.45 to -4.86, p < 0.00001, GRADE: Very low, I2 = 84%) and mean arterial pressure compared to the control group (MD = -6.66, 95% CI -11.27 to -2.04, p = 0.005, GRADE: Very low, I2 = 87%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine may potentially reduce the incidence of delayed graft function and offers a superior analgesia profile as compared to control in adults undergoing renal transplants. However, the high degree of heterogeneity and inadequate sample size underscore the need for future adequately powered trials to confirm these findings.

Zona incerta mediates early life isoflurane-induced fear memory deficits.

The potential long-term effects of anesthesia on cognitive development, especially in neonates and infants, have raised concerns. However, our understanding of its underlying mechanisms and effective treatments is still limited. In this study, we found that early exposure to isoflurane (ISO) impaired fear memory retrieval, which was reversed by dexmedetomidine (DEX) pre-treatment. Measurement of c-fos expression revealed that ISO exposure significantly increased neuronal activation in the zona incerta (ZI). Fiber photometry recording showed that ZI neurons from ISO mice displayed enhanced calcium activity during retrieval of fear memory compared to the control group, while DEX treatment reduced this enhanced calcium activity. Chemogenetic inhibition of ZI neurons effectively rescued the impairments caused by ISO exposure. These findings suggest that the ZI may play a pivotal role in mediating the cognitive effects of anesthetics, offering a potential therapeutic target for preventing anesthesia-related cognitive impairments.

Dexmedetomidine facilitates autophagic flux to promote liver regeneration by suppressing GSK3ß activity in mouse partial hepatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is widely used for sedation and anesthesia in patients undergoing hepatectomy. However, the effect of DEX on autophagic flux and liver regeneration remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the role of DEX in hepatocyte autophagic flux and liver regeneration after PHx. METHODS: In mice, DEX was intraperitoneally injected 5 min before and 6 h after PHx. In vitro, DEX was co-incubated with culture medium for 24 h. Autophagic flux was detected by LC3-II and SQSTM1 expression levels in primary mouse hepatocytes and the proportion of red puncta in AML-12 cells transfected with FUGW-PK-hLC3 plasmid. Liver regeneration was assessed by cyclinD1 expression, Edu incorporation, H&E staining, ki67 immunostaining and liver/body ratios. Bafilomycin A1, si-GSK3ß and Flag-tagged GSK3ß, α2-ADR antagonist, GSK3ß inhibitor, AKT inhibitor were used to identify the role of GSK3ß in DEX-mediated autophagic flux and hepatocyte proliferation. RESULTS: Pre- and post-operative DEX treatment promoted liver regeneration after PHx, showing 12 h earlier than in DEX-untreated mice, accompanied by facilitated autophagic flux, which was completely abolished by bafilomycin A1 or α2-ADR antagonist. The suppression of GSK3ß activity by SB216763 and si-GSK3ß enhanced the effect of DEX on autophagic flux and liver regeneration, which was abolished by AKT inhibitor. CONCLUSION: Pre- and post-operative administration of DEX facilitates autophagic flux, leading to enhanced liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy through suppression of GSK3ß activity in an α2-ADR-dependent manner.

Perioperative dexmedetomidine for pain management in craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Craniotomy is associated with several undesirable effects including postoperative pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate evidence on the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine (DEX) for pain management in patients undergoing craniotomy. METHODS: We followed PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework. We searched for existing randomized controlled studies (RCTs) published before June 2023 that used dexmedetomidine during the perioperative period in craniotomy in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis was conducted in RevMan. Cochrane RoB2 and GRADE were used for quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of 19 RCTs comprising 3,153 patients were included. Pain intensity was lower in the DEX group than the control group at a mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of -0.64 [-1.16, -0.13], p-value=0.01. The DEX group overall consumed less opioids in comparison with the control group at an MD=-4.00 [-6.16, -1.83], p-value=0.0003. However, heterogeneity was considerable for both outcomes (I2=81% and I2=96%, respectively). There was no difference between the DEX and control groups in the time to first post-analgesic requirement, hypertension, hypotension, or cough. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the use of dexmedetomidine was associated with lower pain intensity and less opioid use. Patients in the DEX group experienced fewer episodes of nausea and vomiting, agitation, and shivering but more episodes of bradycardia. There was no difference between DEX and control groups in other adverse events.

Analgesic Effect and Sleep Quality of Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cardiac Surgical Patients After Ultrafast-Track Extubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic and sleep quality effects of dexmedetomidine infusion versus placebo in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with ultra-fast track extubation. DESIGN: The randomized, double-blind clinical trial study. SETTING: At a single academic center hospital. PARTICIPANTS: We included patients aged 25 to 65 scheduled for elective cardiac surgery under general anesthesia with cardiopulmonary bypass from October 2021 to December 2022. INTERVENTION: After immediate extubation in the operating room, the patients who were allocated at first after providing their consent to either the dexmedetomidine group (Dex) or the placebo group (Placebo) received continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.2 µg/kg/h) or saline for 12 hours postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The groups' demographic and perioperative variables were not statistically significant. Total morphine consumption in milligrams at 12 and 24 hours after administered study drug, total sleep time in hours by BIS value ≤85, and sleep quality with the Richard-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire were compared. The analysis included 22 Dex and 23 Placebo patients. The consumption of morphine was not statistically different between the Dex and Placebo groups at 12 and 24 hours (p = 0.707 and p = 0.502, respectively). The Dex group had significantly longer sleep time (8.7 h [7.8, 9.5]) than the Placebo group (5.8 h [2.9, 8.5]; p = 0.007). The Dex group also exhibited better sleep quality (7.9 [6.7, 8.7] vs 6.6 [5.2, 8.0]; p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Sedation with low-dose dexmedetomidine infusion for ultra-fast track extubation following cardiac surgery enhances sleep duration and quality.

Dexmedetomidine Inhibits Hippocampal Neuronal Damage Caused by Persistent Isoflurane-Induced Hypotension in Rat Model of Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on hypotension-induced neuronal damage in a chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (CCH) model of rats, an established model of cerebral white matter lesions (WML) in humans, which is prevalent in the elderly and closely related to cognitive decline. Methods The CCH model rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups: normotension + no DEX (NN) group (n = 6), normotension + DEX (ND) group (n = 6), hypotension + no DEX (HN) group (n = 6), or hypotension + DEX (HD) group (n = 6). Under isoflurane anesthesia, mean arterial blood pressure was maintained at or above 80 mmHg (normotension) or below 60 mmHg (hypotension) for a duration of two hours. The DEX groups received 50 µg of DEX intraperitoneally. Two weeks later, the Y-maze test and, after preparing brain slices, immunohistochemical staining were performed using antibodies against neuronal nuclei (NeuN), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1). Results Behavioral observations showed no significant differences among the groups. Significant reductions of both NeuN-positive cells and the MAP2-positive area were found in the hippocampal CA1 in the HN group compared with NN and ND groups, but not in the HD group. GFAP and Iba-1-positive areas were significantly increased in the HN group, but not in the HD group. Conclusion DEX significantly ameliorated hypotension-induced neuronal damage and both astroglial and microglial activation in the CA1 region of CCH rats.

Combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in gastric cancer patients: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We conducted this double-blinded randomized controlled trial to examine whether the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block could improve analgesia efficacy and duration for gastric cancer patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The preoperative area, operating room, postanesthesia recovery room and bed ward. PATIENTS: A total of 312 adult patients (104 per group) with gastric cancer were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received bilateral subcostal TAP block with three different anesthetics (60 ml 0.25% ropivacaine added with 10 mg dexamethasone and 1 µg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [A] or 10 mg dexamethasone [B] or 1 µg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [C]). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain 24 h on movement. Secondary outcomes included incidence of moderate-to-severe pain, pain score, opioids use, recovery quality and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement 24 h postoperatively of group A was significantly lower than group B (45.19% vs 63.46%; RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92) and group C (45.19% vs 73.08%, RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). The median moving pain scores decreased significantly at 24 h (3.00 [3.00,5.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,6.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,5.00]; P < 0.001). There were significant differences in the opioids consumption within the first 24 h (27.5 [17.0,37.2] vs 30.0 [20.0,42.0] vs 32.0 [25.0,44.0] mg; P = 0.01) and the duration to first rescue analgesia (65.5 ± 26.7 vs 45.9 ± 34.5 vs 49.2 ± 27.2 h; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The combination with dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for TAP block reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and pain score both on movement and at rest at 24 h with prolonged duration to first rescue analgesia after gastric cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000037981.

Alleviation effects of dexmedetomidine on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through fatty acid metabolism pathway via Elovl6.

Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is widely used in the sedation in intensive care units and as an anesthetic adjunct. Considering the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of Dex, we applied in vivo rat model as well as in vitro cardiomyocyte models (embryonic rat cardiomyocytes H9c2 cells and neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, NRCMs) to evaluate the effects of Dex against myocardial ischemia reperfusion (I/R) injury. Transcriptomic sequencing for gene expression in heart tissues from control rats and Dex-treated rats identified that genes related to fatty acid metabolism were significantly regulated by Dex. Among these genes, the elongation of long-chain fatty acids (ELOVL) family member 6 (Elovl6) was most increased upon Dex-treatment. By comparing the effects of Dex on both wild type and Elovl6-knockdown H9c2 cells and NRCMs under oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) challenge, we found that Elovl6 knockdown attenuated the protection efficiency of Dex, which was supported by the cytotoxicity endpoints (cell viability and lactate dehydrogenase release) and apoptosis as well as key gene expressions. These results indicate that Dex exhibited the protective function against myocardial I/R injury via fatty acid metabolism pathways and Elovl6 plays a key role in the process, which was further confirmed using palmitate exposure in both cells, as well as in an in vivo rat model. Overall, this study systematically evaluates the protective effects of Dex on the myocardial I/R injury and provides better understanding on the fatty acid metabolism underlying the beneficial effects of Dex.

Successful Second Awake Craniotomy Reoperation With Dexmedetomidine After an Initial Abandonment Case Due to Restlessness.

Awake craniotomy (AC) is sometimes aborted due to poor arousal and restlessness. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), an α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, has sedative, analgesic, and anesthetic-sparing effects, with a low risk of respiratory depression, making it effective for intraoperative pain and agitation during the awake phase. We report a case in which AC was successfully performed in combination with low-dose continuous administration of DEX during reoperation in a patient who experienced poor arousal and restlessness during their first surgery, leading to the abandonment of AC. The patient is a 48-year-old male who is scheduled for AC reoperation. Two years ago, the first AC was scheduled and performed under anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. However, AC was abandoned due to poor intraoperative arousal and restlessness. At reoperation, general anesthesia was induced with propofol and continuous administration of remifentanil (0.1 µg/kg/min); following anesthesia induction (continuous infusion of propofol, remifentanil, and a bolus infusion of fentanyl), DEX was also administered (0.2 µg/kg/hour). We performed a scalp nerve block. Before the awake phase, the propofol dose was decreased as was DEX to 0.1 µg/kg/hour, and propofol and remifentanil were discontinued. The patient gradually awoke without any agitation and restlessness 24 min after stopping propofol and remifentanil and could perform language tasks without any complications. In this case, AC was successfully performed in combination with continuous low-dose administration of DEX at the time of reoperation in a patient who experienced poor arousal and restlessness during their first operation and had to discontinue AC.

Study on the preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on anesthetic associated sleep disturbance in young to middle-aged female patients undergoing hysteroscopy: a study protocol for a crossover randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative sleep disturbance has a potentially detrimental effect on postoperative recovery. Perioperative patients are affected by several factors. General anesthesia induces a non-physiological state that does not resemble natural sleep. Exposure to propofol/sevoflurane can lead to desynchronization of the circadian rhythm, which may result in postoperative sleep disturbance characterized by mid-cycle advancement of sleep and daytime sleepiness. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist with a unique sedative effect that facilitates the transition from sleep to wakefulness. Basic research has shown that dexmedetomidine induces deep sedation, similar to physical sleep, and helps maintain forebrain connectivity, which is likely to reduce delirium after surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of exposure to the mono-anesthetic propofol on the development of postoperative sleep disturbance in young and middle-aged female patients undergoing hysteroscopy and whether prophylactic administration of dexmedetomidine influences reducing postoperative sleep disturbance. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) will include 150 patients undergoing hysteroscopy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. Participants will be randomly assigned to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. The dexmedetomidine group will have two subgroups and will receive a nasal spray of 0.2 µg/kg or 0.5 µg/kg 25 min before surgery, while the control group will receive a saline nasal spray. Three groups will undergo hysteroscopy with propofol-based TIVA according to the same scheme. Sleep quality will be measured using a wearable device and double-blind sleep assessments will be performed before surgery and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery. SPSS 2.0 is used for statistical analysis. A χ2 test is used to compare groups, and t-test is used to determine statistical the significance of continuous variables. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of propofol-associated sleep disorders and to test a combination of dexmedetomidine anesthesia regimen for the prevention of postoperative sleep disorders. This study will help to improve patients' postoperative satisfaction and provide a new strategy for comfortable perioperative medical treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06281561. Registered on February 24, 2024.

Dexmedetomidine as a total intravenous anesthetic in pediatric patients undergoing cleft lip and palate surgery: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for pediatric cleft lip and palate repair often utilizes high-dose opioids and inhaled anesthesia, thereby causing postoperative complications such as desaturation and/or severe agitation after anesthesia. These complications are detrimental to the child and medical personnel and cause tremendous psychologic stress to parents. Our aim is to decrease these complications through dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 receptor agonist with anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and analgetic properties. Devoid of respiratory depressant effect, it allows patients to maintain effective ventilation and reduce agitation, postoperatively. Its unique anesthetic property may shed light on providing safe anesthesia and gentle emergence to this young, vulnerable population. CASE PRESENTATION: A total of 21 patients of Sundanese ethnicity, aged 3 months to 8 years (9 males and 12 females), underwent cleft lip or cleft palate surgery using total intravenous dexmedetomidine. Anesthesia was induced using sevoflurane, fentanyl, and propofol, and airway was secured. Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1.5 µg/kg was administered within 10 minutes, and a maintenance dose of 1.5 µg/kg/hour was continued as the sole anesthetic maintenance agent thereafter. Hemodynamics and anesthetic depth using Patient State Index (SEDLine™ monitor, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA) were monitored carefully throughout the surgical procedure. Dexmedetomidine did not cause any hemodynamic derangements or postoperative complications in any of our patients. We found agitation in 9.5% (2/21) of patients. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine can be used as a total intravenous anesthetic agent to maintain anesthesia and provide gentle emergence to infants and young children undergoing cleft lip and palate repair.

Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine on patient-centred outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is increasingly used for surgical patients requiring general anaesthesia. However, its effectiveness on patient-centred outcomes remains uncertain. Our main objective was to evaluate the patient-centred effectiveness of intraoperative dexmedetomidine for adult patients requiring surgery under general anaesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to October 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine with placebo, opioid, or usual care in adult patients requiring surgery under general anaesthesia were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two reviewers independently. We synthesised data using a random-effects Bayesian regression framework to derive effect estimates and the probability of a clinically important effect. For continuous outcomes, we pooled instruments with similar constructs using standardised mean differences (SMDs) and converted SMDs and credible intervals (CrIs) to their original scale when appropriate. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Our primary outcome was quality of recovery after surgery. To guide interpretation on the original scale, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) instrument was used (range 0-150 points, minimally important difference [MID] of 6 points). RESULTS: We identified 49,069 citations, from which 44 RCTs involving 5904 participants were eligible. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration was associated with improvement in postoperative QoR-15 (mean difference 9, 95% CrI 4-14, n=21 RCTs, moderate certainty of evidence). We found 99% probability of any benefit and 88% probability of achieving the MID. There was a reduction in chronic pain incidence (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% CrI 0.19-0.79, n=7 RCTs, low certainty of evidence). There was also increased risk of clinically significant hypotension (OR 1.98, 95% CrI 0.84-3.92, posterior probability of harm 94%, n=8 RCTs) and clinically significant bradycardia (OR 1.74, 95% CrI 0.93-3.34, posterior probability of harm 95%, n=10 RCTs), with very low certainty of evidence for both. There was limited evidence to inform other secondary patient-centred outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo or standard of care, intraoperative dexmedetomidine likely results in meaningful improvement in the quality of recovery and chronic pain after surgery. However, it might increase clinically important bradycardia and hypotension. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023439896).

Clinical adverse events to dexmedetomidine: a real-world drug safety study based on the FAERS database.

Objective: Adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine were analyzed using data from the FDA's FAERS database, spanning from 2004 to the third quarter of 2023. This analysis serves as a foundation for monitoring dexmedetomidine's safety in clinical applications. Methods: Data on adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine were standardized and analyzed to identify clinical adverse events closely linked to its use. This analysis employed various signal quantification analysis algorithms, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Results: In the FAERS database, dexmedetomidine was identified as the primary suspect in 1,910 adverse events. Our analysis encompassed 26 organ system levels, from which we selected 346 relevant Preferred Terms (PTs) for further examination. Notably, adverse drug reactions such as diabetes insipidus, abnormal transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring, acute motor axonal neuropathy, and trigeminal cardiac reflex were identified. These reactions are not explicitly mentioned in the drug's specification, indicating the emergence of new signals for adverse drug reactions. Conclusion: Data mining in the FAERS database has elucidated the characteristics of dexmedetomidine-related adverse drug reactions. This analysis enhances our understanding of dexmedetomidine's drug safety, aids in the clinical management of pharmacovigilance studies, and offers valuable insights for refining drug-use protocols.

A Comparative Study of Fixed-Dose Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusions on Intraoperative Desflurane Consumption During Bispectral Index-Guided Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background Desflurane is an excellent but expensive volatile anesthetic agent. Dexmedetomidine and propofol may decrease intraoperative desflurane consumption. This study aimed to compare the desflurane-sparing effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under bispectral index (BIS)-guided general anesthesia (GA). Methods Sixty-two adult patients, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I or II, of either sex, aged between 18 and 60 years, were randomly allocated into group D or group P. Only group D patients received an intravenous (IV) bolus of dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) over 15 minutes before induction. In both groups, GA was induced following the standard protocol with propofol infusion (0.5 mg/kg/min) until the BIS value dropped below 60. For maintenance, group D and group P patients received IV dexmedetomidine infusion (0.5 mcg/kg/h) and propofol infusion (50 mcg/kg/min), respectively. In both groups, desflurane dial concentration was adjusted between 3 and 8% to maintain the BIS within the range of 45-55. An hourly bolus of IV fentanyl (0.5 mcg/kg) and a half-hourly bolus of IV vecuronium (0.02 mg/kg) were administered. The total amount of desflurane consumed, duration of pneumoperitoneum, extra aliquots of propofol used during maintenance, number of boluses of IV atropine, fentanyl, and esmolol, time to attain Ramsay Sedation Score of 2 after extubation, time to first postoperative analgesic request at Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score ≥ 4, time to reach a Modified Aldrete Score of ≥9, and incidence of any side effects were recorded. All the data were analyzed and compared using appropriate statistical tests, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results The final data analysis was performed on 60 patients. The mean desflurane consumption was clinically higher in group P patients than in group D, but the difference was statistically insignificant (p-value > 0.05). The mean induction dose of propofol was significantly less in group D than in group P (p-value < 0.05). After extubation, the difference in time to the first analgesic request (NRS ≥ 4) between the groups was statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). Group D patients had a residual intraoperative analgesic effect. Conclusion The effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol infusions on desflurane consumption in laparoscopic surgeries are comparable, with minimal effects on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative recovery profiles.

Intraoperative application of low-dose dexmedetomidine or lidocaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients following craniotomy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Background: Postoperative pain is a common occurrence in pediatric patients following craniotomy, often leading to negative outcomes. Intravenous dexmedetomidine and lidocaine are commonly used adjuvant medicines in general anesthesia to reduce perioperative opioid consumption and relieve postoperative pain in adults. While they show promise for use in pediatrics, the evidence of their application in pediatric craniotomy patients is limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on postoperative pain in pediatric patients following craniotomy. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, single-center trial on children scheduled for craniotomy. The 255 recruited participants aged 1-12 years were randomly assigned to intraoperatively receive a loading intravenous dose of either dexmedetomidine 1 µg·kg-1 or lidocaine 2 mg·kg-1 or normal saline for 15 min followed by dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg·kg-1·h-1 or lidocaine 1 mg·kg-1·h-1 or normal saline until the sutures of endocranium were completed. The primary outcome was the cumulative sufentanil consumption within 24 h post-surgery. Results: A total of 241 patients were included in the statistical analysis. The primary outcome did not show any significant differences among the three groups (median (IQR) lidocaine group: 3.36 (1.32-5.64) µg vs. dexmedetomidine group: 3.12 (1.36-6.39) µg vs. control group 3.46 (1.77-7.62) µg, p = 0.485). Among the secondary outcomes, there was a statistically significant but small reduction in sufentanil consumption within 2 h, postoperative FLACC/WBFS/NRS pain scores within 4 h after surgery and postoperative Ramsay sedation scores in dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.05). Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of electrolyte disturbance within 24 and 48 h after surgery was significantly higher in control group compared to the other two groups. There were no significant differences in intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative frequency of remedy medication, or length of hospitalization among the three groups. No adverse events related to lidocaine or dexmedetomidine were observed. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the primary outcome among the three groups. Although dexmedetomidine showed some benefits in reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the first 2 h and pain intensity within the first 4 h post-surgery, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research is required to comprehensively assess the outcomes and determine the optimal administration strategy. Clinical Trial Registration: [http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx], identifier [ChiCTR1800019411].

The effect of post-anesthetic administration of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on postoperative agitation of strabismus surgery in children: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Introduction: Postoperative agitation is a common complication of sevoflurane anesthesia in children and might lead to self-harm and recovery disruption. This study aimed to compare the prophylactic effect of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on postoperative agitation after anesthesia with sevoflurane. Methods: In this clinical trial, 60 children aged 2 to 7 years with ASA class І, II, candidates for elective strabismus surgery, were randomly assigned to three groups using block randomization. Patients in the first group D received 0.5 µgr/kg dexmedetomidine, the second group R received 0.1 µgr/kg remifentanil, and another group C received normal saline at the end of anesthesia. Children's agitation degree was measured by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scales and the 4-point agitation scale at the time of extubation, entering the recovery room, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after entrance. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistical tests. Results: The postoperative agitation and pain were significantly lower among children who received dexmedetomidine compared with those in remifentanil and the control group (p < .001). It was observed that the administration of dexmedetomidine at the end of anesthesia significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative agitation (p < .001). None of the patients in group D had a PAED score of over 12. Conclusion: Based on PAED and the 4-point scales, none of the cases in group D had experienced postoperative agitation; this made a significant statistical difference compared with groups C and R (p-value <. 001). Although both dexmedetomidine and remifentanil can prevent and attenuate postoperative agitation, dexmedetomidine administration seems significantly more effective.