Prospective assessment of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy under direct cholangioscopic visualization for biliary strictures that could not be definitively diagnosed using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (with video).

The definitive diagnosis of patients with indeterminate biliary strictures remains challenging. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides real-time histological assessment of bile duct tissues. Since no previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of pCLE under direct cholangioscopic visualization for biliary strictures that cannot be definitively diagnosed through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using fluoroscopy, we prospectively assessed the feasibility and safety of this procedure in three cases. pCLE findings were obtained in three cases, providing accurate diagnoses. Additionally, no adverse event was reported. pCLE under direct cholangioscopic visualization for indeterminate biliary strictures might be feasible and safe, even though these strictures were not previously diagnosed using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Further studies with more cases are warranted to clarify the effectiveness of pCLE under direct cholangioscopic visualization.

Unilateral drainage and chemotherapy prolong the patency of a plastic stent placed above the sphincter of Oddi in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

Objectives: To evaluate the results of inside stent therapy for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction and identify factors related to stent patency duration. Methods: Of 44 patients who underwent initial inside-stent placement above the sphincter of Oddi from April 2017 to December 2022, 42 with the resolution of jaundice (clinical success rate, 95.5%) were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with stent patency duration. Results: Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in the drainage method (406 days for unilateral drainage vs. 305 days for bilateral drainage of the right and left liver lobes, p = 0.022) with or without chemotherapy (406 days with vs. 154 days without, p = 0.038). Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards analysis) revealed similar results, with unilateral drainage (p = 0.031) and chemotherapy (p = 0.048) identified as independent factors associated with prolonged stent patency. Early adverse events were observed in two patients (4.8%; one cholangitis, one pancreatitis). Conclusions: Inside-stent therapy was safely performed in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Simple unilateral drainage and chemotherapy may prolong stent patency.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis: A single-center retrospective study in Japan.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the treatment of acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis. Methods: The Japanese government declared a state of emergency in April 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 309 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis between April 2017 and December 2022. Results: Patients were categorized into a pregroup (n = 134) and a postgroup (n = 175), depending on whether they were diagnosed before or after the state of emergency declaration. The total number of ERCP cases and the number of ERCP cases with endoscopic stone removals increased after the state of emergency declaration. Compared with the pregroup, the numbers of patients with performance status of 0-1 and surgically altered anatomy increased, whereas the numbers of patients taking oral antiplatelets or anticoagulants and those with cerebrovascular disease decreased in the postgroup. The number of single-stage endoscopic stone removals increased and hospital stays were significantly shorter in the postgroup. No differences in adverse event rates were detected between the two groups. Conclusions: Although our hospital provides tertiary care, the number of patients with cholangitis in good general condition and no underlying disease increased after the state of emergency declaration. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increase in the number of single-stage endoscopic treatments and shortened hospital stays for patients with acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis. No safety issues with ERCP were detected, even during the pandemic.

Comparative analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of remimazolam tosylate and propofol in older adults undergoing painless endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Objective: The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the therapeutic outcomes associated with the administration of remimazolam and propofol during painless endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures in older adults. Methods: A total of 140 older adults who underwent elective painless ERCP were randomly assigned to two groups using the random number table method: the remimazolam group and the propofol group, each consisting of 70 patients. In the remimazolam group, anesthesia was administered using a combination of remimazolam and opioids, while in the propofol group, a combination of propofol and opioids was used. Comparative assessments between the two groups included anesthesia induction time, first induction success rate, intraoperative hemodynamics, awakening duration, stress response index, and the incidence of adverse reactions. Results: The remimazolam group exhibited a prolonged anesthesia induction time compared to the propofol group and a lower success rate of first induction (P < 0.05). At the point of endoscope entry (T2) and 10 min post-operation (T3), patients in the remimazolam group demonstrated higher mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) values compared to those in the propofol group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the remimazolam group had shorter durations for eye-opening, consciousness recovery, and residence in the recovery room compared to the propofol group (P < 0.05). Post-surgery levels of epinephrine (E), norepinephrine (NE), and cortisol (Cor) at 24 h were lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the remimazolam group (18.57%) compared to the propofol group (31.43%) (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Remimazolam exhibits a longer induction time compared to propofol in the painless diagnosis and treatment of ERCP in older adults. However, it provides a more stable circulatory state post-induction and throughout the operation, reduces stress response, enables rapid recovery, and has a lower incidence of serious adverse reactions. These attributes suggest that remimazolam has potential for widespread clinical application and adoption. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier ChiCTR2400080926.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary rendezvous after failed cannulation, and comparison between benign vs malignant biliopancreatic disorders: outcomes at a single tertiary-care centre.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary rendezvous (RV) is an EUS-assisted technique described as a rescue method in cases of failed biliary cannulation via endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Current literature remains unclear regarding its current role. The study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness for biliary EUS-RV, and comparison between benign vs malignant biliopancreatic disorders. METHODS: Retrospective observational study with prospective consecutive inclusion in a specific database from a tertiary-center. All patients with biliopancreatic diseases that underwent a EUS-assisted ERC between October-2010 and November-2022 for failed ERC were included. Main outcomes were technical/overall success. Secondary outcomes were safety, potential factors related to failure/success or safety; and a comparative analysis between EUS-RV and EUS-guided transmural drainage (TMD) in malignant cases. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients who underwent EUS-RV procedures, with benign and malignant pathologies (n = 40 vs n = 29), were included. Technical / overall success and related-adverse events (AEs) were 79.7% (95%CI, 68.3-88.4) / 74% (95%CI, 61-83.7) and 24% (95%CI, 15.1-36.5), respectively. Failed cases were mainly related with guidewire manipulation. Seven failed RV were successfully rescued by EUS-TMD. On multivariable analysis, EUS-RV and malignant pathology was associated with a greater failure rate (technical success: OR,0.21; 95%CI,0.05-0.72; p = 0.017), and higher AEs rate (OR,3.46; 95%CI,1.13-11.5; p = 0.034). Also, the EUS-TMD group had greater technical success (OR,16.96; 95%CI,4.69-81.62; p < 0.001) and overall success (OR, 3.09; 95%CI,1.18-8-16; p < 0.026) with a lower AEs rate (OR,0.30; 95%CI,0.11-0.78; p = 0.014) than EUS-RV in malignant disorders. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-RV is a demanding technique with better outcomes in benign than in malignant biliopancreatic diseases. Comparison of the EUS-TMD group on malignant disorders showed worse outcomes with EUS-RV. Given these findings, maybe EUS-RV is not the best option for malignant biliopancreatic disorders.

Last international guidelines suggest Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided assisted bile duct access (or biliary rendezvous) after a second failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERC) in benign biliary disease, in high volume centers, but its current role in malignant disease is unclear.This study provides a larger number of EUS-guided biliary rendezvous cases than reported in previous studies, and offers new and relevant information, not available in the last clinical guidelines or systematic reviewsThe EUS-guided biliary rendezvous associates better effectiveness in benign than in malignant biliopancreatic disorders. When comparing EUS-guided rendezvous with EUS-biliary transmural drainage in malignant diseases, rendezvous has a lower success, and higher adverse events. Therefore, maybe EUS-guided rendezvous is not the best option for malignant disorders and might be reserved for benign cases.

Incidentally detected pancreatic duct dilatation on ultrasound and role of MRI.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of incidentally detected pancreatic duct (PD) dilatation at ultrasound (US) without a visualized underlying cause is unclear. We aimed to assess the role of subsequent MRI (including MRCP) and to identify US imaging and laboratory findings predictive of underlying pancreaticobiliary malignancy at the time of initial US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with incidentally detected PD dilatation at ultrasound from 2011 to 2019 that had an ensuing MRI were included. Based on MRI results patients were divided into three groups: malignant pancreaticobiliary causes, benign causes and idiopathic PD dilatation. Subsequently the diagnostic ability of MRI was assessed. Initial ultrasound findings and laboratory results were compared between groups to identify predictors of underlying pancreaticobiliary pathology. A p-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In 37/59 (63%) patients PD dilatation was confirmed on MRI. MRI demonstrated malignant 7/59 (12%) and benign 10/59 (17%) causes of PD dilatation detected at initial ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy of MRI to ascertain the cause of PD dilatation was 89%, 100%, 95%, 100% and 97% respectively. Patients with a larger magnitude of PD dilatation, concomitant CBD dilatation and elevated lipase values were more likely to have underlying pancreaticobiliary malignancy (p < 0.05). No patient with initial negative MRI had pancreaticobiliary malignancy on subsequent work-up. CONCLUSION: Incidentally detected PD dilatation on ultrasound is an important finding and should prompt referral to MRI. MRI is an accurate, noninvasive method for identifying the underlying cause of PD dilatation in these patients and in excluding pancreaticobiliary malignancy.

Evaluating the yield of digital single operator cholangioscopy in posttransplant biliary strictures after unsuccessful guidewire placement with ERCP.

Background and Aims: Strictures are the most common biliary complication after liver transplantation, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered the gold standard in its management. Failure to cross the biliary anastomosis requires a repeated attempt with ERCP, referral for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) or surgery. We present our experience with the digital single operator cholangioscope (D-SOC) in achieving guidewire access in a liver transplant cohort with difficult biliary strictures who have failed conventional ERCP methods. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving two adult liver transplant centers servicing the two most populated states in Australia. Deceased-donor liver transplant recipients undergoing D-SOC for biliary strictures who have failed conventional methods to achieve biliary access were included. Results: Between July 2017 to April 2022, eighteen patients underwent D-SOC after failing to achieve guidewire placement through standard ERCP techniques. Thirteen out of eighteen (72%) had successful guidewire placement with index D-SOC. Five of eighteen patients (28%) had unsuccessful guidewire placement with D-SOC. In two of these patients, use of D-SOC informed further endoscopic management, with one avoiding PTC and the other avoiding surgery. Two of the five patients required PTC and one patient was left unstented. Three patients developed post D-SOC cholangitis. Conclusions: D-SOC is effective at achieving guidewire access in post-liver transplant patients who fail conventional ERCP techniques and should be considered in the treatment algorithm as a step before PTC and surgery.

The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate compared with propofol for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under monitored anesthesia care: A single-center randomized controlled clinical trial.

Background: Although remimazolam tosilate is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that causes less respiratory and circulatory depression than propofol, studies evaluating its efficacy and safety during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and propofol for ERCP performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Methods: This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial featuring a noninferiority design. A total of 102 eligible patients undergoing ERCP under MAC were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam tosilate group (R group) or the propofol group (P group) in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the R group were sedated with remimazolam tosilate, while those in the P group received propofol, both under MAC. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of ERCP completion under MAC. Secondary outcomes included the time to loss of consciousness, sedative effects, and perioperative adverse events at various time points for patients in both groups. Results: Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The successful completion rate for ERCP under MAC was 100 % in the R group and 96.1 % in the P group, resulting in a difference of 3.92 % (95 % CI: -2%, 10 %). This difference met the pre-established criterion of being greater than -8%. The total number of norepinephrine infusions, as well as the incidence of intravenous injection pain, post-induction hypotension, post-induction bradycardia, intraoperative hypotension, respiratory depression, and hypoxemia, were significantly lower in the R group compared to the P group. Conversely, the total number of phloroglucinol uses, body movements, and instances of rapid gastrointestinal peristalsis were significantly higher in the R group than in the P group. Discussion: Remimazolam-based MAC for ERCP exhibited non-inferior efficacy compared to propofol-based MAC, while also resulting in fewer circulatory and respiratory adverse events during the procedures. Nevertheless, future studies with larger sample sizes are required to evaluate the utility of remimazolam in elderly patients.

The impact of periampullary diverticula on cannulation and adverse events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Background: Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) is commonly encountered in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. Objectives: We sought to determine whether PADs are associated with a lower success rate of cannulation and an increased risk of adverse events. Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using prospectively gathered nationwide registry data. Methods: Using the Swedish registry for gallstone surgery and ERCP, we analyzed a cohort of 66,974 prospectively registered ERCP procedures performed in 2006-2021. The presence of PAD was divided into two groups based on the PAD type: Boix type 1 (the papilla located inside the PAD) and Boix types 2-3 (the papilla located either at the edge of the PAD or immediately adjacent to the PAD). The primary outcomes were the success rate of cannulation and overall adverse events within 30 days. Results: PADs were registered in 8130 (12.1%) of ERCPs included in the study population. In total, 2114 (3.9%) patients had Boix type 1 PAD, while 5035 (8.2%) patients had Boix type 2 or 3 PAD. The chance of successful cannulation was lower in patients with type 1 PAD compared to no PAD (80.1% vs 88.7%; odds ratio: 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.46). No differences were seen in overall adverse events or post-ERCP pancreatitis. Adverse events occurred in 14.6% of patients with PAD type 1 and 16.0% of patients with PAD type 2 or 3, compared to 16.5% of patients without a PAD. Conclusion: Cannulation appears less successful during ERCP when the papilla is located in the PAD (i.e., type 1). Adverse events seem not to increase with the presence of a PAD, but they could theoretically be influenced by the inability to cannulate.

How a pouch in the duodenum affects the difficulty and complications of an endoscopic procedure investigating the bile ducts A duodenal diverticulum (pouch in the duodenum) is a common finding during endoscopic examinations. A diverticulum can make it harder to do an ERCP, which is an endoscopic procedure that examines the bile ducts. The diverticulum might make it harder to do an ERCP because it affects the opening where the bile is released into the intestine. If the bile duct opening is inside the diverticulum, it is classified as type 1. If it is on the edge or outside, it is classified as type 2-3. This study used Swedish registry data to see if these types of diverticula make ERCP harder and cause more problems after the procedure. 47,486 procedures were investigated, and 12.1% had a diverticulum. A type 1 diverticulum makes ERCP harder. There was no difference in complications between the types of diverticula and no diverticulum. This means a diverticulum does not raise the risk of complications during ERCP. However, for a type 1 diverticulum, not being able to perform ERCP may prevent complications.

Laparoscope combined with ureteroscope in the treatment of bile duct stones and cholecystolithiasis in a child: a case report and literature review.

Cholecystolithiasis combined with bile duct stones is more and more common in children, but the surgical treatment is still controversial. We report on a 3-year-old boy, who underwent laparoscope combined with ureteroscope for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis. This combination therapy offers the possibility to treat pediatric patients with cholecystolithiasis and bile duct stones in low-resource settings where ERCP experience and child-specific surgical instruments are not available. Additionally, a comprehensive review of previous studies was conducted to summarize the surgical treatments. The surgical treatment of children should be made according to the specific situation to maximize the success of the operation and reduce the risk.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) versus choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) in ERCP-failed malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and META-analysis.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard in managing malignant biliary obstruction. The success of ERCP has limitations, whereas surgical biliary bypass and percutaneous transhepatic approaches, as alternative modalities, come with significant costs, longer durations, and higher levels of mortality and morbidity. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided biliary drainage with two approaches, hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) and choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), is a favored and evolving alternative modality. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of EUS-HGS and EUS-CDS. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Scholar databases up to August 2023, based on the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. We identified randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing the efficacy and safety of EUS-HGS and EUS-CDS. Outcome measures included technical and clinical success, side effects, and mean procedure time. Nine nonrandomized studies and two randomized controlled trials involving 537 patients (225 EUS-HGS, 312 EUS-CDS) were analyzed. No difference was found in technical success (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.41-1.68; I 2 = 0%) and clinical success between the two procedures (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.51-1.81; I 2 = 9.94%). Side effects were significantly higher in EUS-HGS (OR, 2.01, 95% CI, 1.14-3.59; I 2 = 0%). No significant difference in mean procedure time was observed between the two procedures (0.13; 95% CI, -0.15-0.41; I 2 = 34.89%). There are differences in efficacy and safety between EUS-HGS and EUS-CDS. EUS-CDS has a faster procedure time, lower risk of side effects, and ease of puncture during the procedure.

Use of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Pancreatic Injury.

BACKGROUND: ERCP is the gold standard for evaluating the integrity of the main pancreatic duct (MPD); however, ERCP is underutilized in evaluating MPD integrity in pediatric blunt pediatric injury. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the discordance of cross-sectional imaging (CSI) and ERCP in children with suspected MPD injury. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients age ≤18 years with CSI or clinical findings suggestive of MPD injury (MPDI) and ERCP was conducted at a level I pediatric trauma center from January 2009 to May 2023. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Pancreatic injury findings were compared between cross-sectional imaging and ERCP. RESULTS: An ERCP was performed in 28 patients with suspected MPDI with a mean age of 7 ± 4.5 years and weight of 25.0 ± 13.6 kg. Based on initial CSI, 23 patients had a suspected MPDI, and 5 had concern for MPDI based on clinical findings. ERCP differed from CSI findings in 39% of patients: 7 with CSI evidence of MPDI without injury on ERCP and 4 patients without imaging concern of MPDI but demonstrated injury on ERCP. Findings on ERCP guided surgical management in 71% (20/28) of patients due to location and completeness of MPDI. All patients without MPDI were managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSION: Approximately 40% of patients had discordant findings between ERCP and CSI. ERCP can aide in surgical management decision making. All patients with a partial MPDI were managed with endoscopic therapy alone. ERCP should be considered when assessing a child with a suspected MPDI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Diagnostic Study.

Comparison of radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time between minimally invasive common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure (RE) causes dose-dependent deleterious effects, and efforts should be made to decrease patient exposure to ionizing radiation. Patients with choledocholithiasis are commonly exposed to ionizing radiation as fluoroscopy-guided interventions including minimally invasive common bile duct (CBD) exploration (MICBDE) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are the preferred treatment modalities for CBD stone clearance. However, RE and fluoroscopy times (FTs) have not been compared between these 2 treatment modalities. Thus, this study aimed to compare FT and RE between MICBDE and ERCP in patients with choledocholithiasis. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of a single surgeon performing MICBDE at an academic referral center between May 2021 and June 2023 compared with a retrospective analysis of all ERCPs performed between January 2020 and February 2021. Patient demographics, procedural details, fluoroscopic details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the MICBDE and ERCP. The study was conducted as a single institution academic referral center located in the American Southwest. A total of 109 patients with choledocholithiasis were divided into 2 groups. A total of 53 (48.62%) patients underwent ERCP, and 56 (51.38%) patients underwent MICBDE. Inclusion criterion was all patients presenting with choledocholithiasis and subsequently undergoing ERCP or MICBDE. Patients who underwent ERCP for non-choledocholithiasis-related reasons were excluded. Primary outcomes include FT measured in minutes and RE measured in milligray (mGy). Secondary outcomes were successful clearance of the CBD, complications, procedural time, and reinterventions. RESULTS: A significant difference (P < .001) between FTs was identified between ERCP (3.1 min) and MICBDE (1.54 min). Median RE doses between the ERCP group (38 mGy) and the MICBDE group (38.41 mGy) were not statistically different (P = .88). Technical success of CBD clearance was similar in both groups (91% in the MICBDE group vs 93% in ERCP group; P = .711). CONCLUSION: Advantages of MICBDE over ERCP include the treatment of choledocholithiasis at the time of cholecystectomy, which reduces the risk of additional anesthesia episodes and introduces the potential for shorter hospital length of stay. This study showed that MICDBE had lower FT than had ERCP, and comparable RE. Given the advantages of MICBDE, it should be strongly considered at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Can early precut reduce post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in patients with difficult bile duct cannulation?

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with a variety of adverse events (AEs). One of the most important AEs is post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which is most common in cases of difficult biliary cannulation. Although the precut technique has been reported as a PEP risk factor, recent studies indicate that early precut could reduce PEP, and that precut itself is not a risk factor. AIM: To evaluate the safety of the precut technique, especially in terms of PEP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study, spanning the period from November 2011 through December 2021. It included 1556 patients, aged ≥ 20 years, who underwent their initial ERCP attempt for biliary disease with a naïve papilla at the Kawasaki University General Medical Center. We compared the PEP risk between the early precut and the delayed precut group. RESULTS: The PEP incidence rate did not significantly differ between the precut and non-precut groups. However, the PEP incidence was significantly lower in the early precut group than the delayed precut group (3.5% vs 10.5%; P = 0.02). The PEP incidence in the delayed precut group without pancreatic stent insertion (17.3%) was significantly higher compared to other cases (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that early precut may reduce PEP incidence. If the precut decision is delayed, a pancreatic stent should be inserted to prevent PEP.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: The road is open for almighty biliopancreatic endoscopists!

Commentary on the article written and published by Peng et al, investigating the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). For 40 years endoscopic biliary drainage was synonymous with ERCP, and EUS was used mainly for diagnostic purposes. The advent of therapeutic EUS has revolutionized the field, especially with the development of a novel device such as electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents. Complete biliopancreatic endoscopists with both skills in ERCP and in interventional EUS, would be ideally suited to ensure patients the best drainage technique according to each individual situation.

Procedure-related readmissions following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a liver transplant cohort.

Background and Aim: Data on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) adverse events and readmission rates in liver transplantation (LT) patients remain scarce. This study determined the 30-day procedure-related readmission rate following ERCP in an LT cohort at an Australian tertiary academic center. Methods: All unplanned readmissions within 30 days following ERCP in orthotopic LT patients between December 2012 and August 2021 were retrospectively identified. Demographic data, procedure variables, and readmission characteristics were also collected. Results: Forty-five procedure-related readmissions were identified (3.3%) from a total of 1369 ERCP procedures. This included 33 cases of cholangitis (2.4%), 7 cases of nonspecific abdominal pain (0.5%), 5 cases of mild post-ERCP pancreatitis (0.5%), and 3 cases of bleeding (0.2%). No procedure-related mortality was observed. Conclusion: The procedure-related readmission rate following ERCP in this LT cohort was 3.3%, which is likely lower than comparable studies carried out on the overall population.

A retrospective comparative study of biliary drainage using balloon endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound for malignant obstruction in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in patients with surgically altered anatomy is challenging, and technical difficulty could differ by the anatomy. Balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (BE-ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) are both emerging procedures, and we conducted the single-center, retrospective study to compare clinical outcomes of BE-ERCP and EUS-BD for MBO. METHODS: Consecutive patients with surgically altered anatomy who underwent BE-ERCP or EUS-BD for MBO were retrospectively studies. Technical and clinical success rates, adverse events (AEs), and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) were compared. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between BE-ERCP (n = 118) and EUS-BD (n = 32), other than more patients with hepaticojejunostomy in the BE-ERCP group (66% vs. 44%, P = 0.03). Technical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-BD group (70% vs. 94%, P = 0.005), but clinical success rates (84% vs. 90%, P = 0.55), early AE (14% vs. 22%, P = 0.29) and late AE rates (42% vs. 38%, P = 0.84), and RBO rates (31% vs. 34%, P = 0.67) were comparable between the groups. TRBO was 170 and 206 days in the BE-ERCP and EUS-BD group (P = 0.37). In the subgroup analysis of patients with the intact papilla, the technical success rate of BE-ERCP was as low as 55%, compared to 94% in EUS-BD (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: EUS-BD was associated with higher technical success rate than BE-ERCP for MBO in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Moderate Sedation or Deep Sedation for ERCP: What Are the Preferences in the Literature?

One of the most essential procedures for individuals with biliopancreatic disorders is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). It is based on the combination of endoscopy and radiology to study the biliopancreatic ducts and apply therapeutic solutions. ERCP is currently used to treat choledocholithiasis with or without cholangitis, as well as pancreatic duct stones, benign bile, and pancreatic leaks. On the other hand, ERCP is an unpleasant procedure that must be conducted under anesthetic (moderate sedation, deep sedation, or general anesthesia). With procedures becoming more challenging, the role of anesthesia in ERCP has become even more relevant, and the use of general anesthesia has become better defined. In the last decades, many drugs have been used and some new drugs, like dexmedetomidine, have been recently introduced for sedation or anesthesia during ERCP. Moreover, the scientific community is still divided on the level of sedation to be applied, as well as on appropriate airway management. We therefore performed a narrative review of the literature to assess currently available anesthetic medications for elective ERCP and evidence supporting their effectiveness.

Endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy complications at a Nigerian tertiary health facility.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration for biliary stone disease are common hepatobiliary surgeries performed by general surgeons in Nigeria. These procedures can be complicated by injury to the biliary tree or retained stones, requiring repeat surgical intervention. This study presents the experience of using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of hepatobiliary surgery complications at the academic referral center of Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital (OAUTHC) Ile-Ife, Nigeria. METHODS: All patients with postcholecystectomy complications referred to the endoscopy unit at OAUTHC from March 2018 to April 2023 were enrolled. Preoperative imaging included a combination of abdominal ultrasound, CT, MRI, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and T-tube cholangiogram. All ERCP procedures were performed under general anesthesia. RESULTS: Seventy-two ERCP procedures were performed on 45 patients referred for postcholecystectomy complications. The most common mode of presentation was ascending cholangitis [16 (35.6%)], followed by persistent biliary fistula [12 (26.7%)]. The overall median duration of symptoms after cholecystectomy was 20 weeks, with a range of 1-162 weeks. The most common postcholecystectomy complication observed was retained stone [16 (35.6%)]. Other postcholecystectomy complications included bile leakage, bile stricture, bile leakage with stricture, and persistent bile leakage from the T-tube in 12 (26.7%), 11 (24.4%), 4 (8.9%), and 2 (4.4%) patients, respectively. Ampullary cannulation during ERCP was successful in all patients (45, 100%). Patients with complete biliary stricture (10/12) required hepaticojejunostomy. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy complications was found to be safe and reduce the number of needless surgeries to which such patients are exposed. We recommended prompt referral of such patients for ERCP.

Comparison of ERCP Outcomes and Complication Risk between Elderly and Younger Patients: A Large Single-Center Study.

Objectives: The current study compared potential risks, complications, and the impact on clinical outcomes among elderly and younger patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Methods: Procedure-related complications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes following complications in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) and younger who underwent biliary ERCP were evaluated. Results: Median age of 63 (48-74) of 1164 patients who underwent biliary ERCP for the first time, and 266 (22.8%) were elderly. Comorbidities were statistically significant (81 [30.5%] versus 78 [8.7%], p < 0.001), and periampullary diverticulum (PAD) was detected more commonly in the elderly group (79 [29.7%] vs. 103 [11.5%], p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in cannulation technique, cannulation time, and cannulation success in both groups, while the total ERCP procedure time was higher in the elderly group (22 [16-29] vs. 20 [14-29], p = 0.030). Regarding the procedure-related complications, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (26 [9.8%] vs. 71 [7.9%], p = 0.292). In the case of complications, the length of hospitalization stay was statistically longer in the elderly group. Moreover, the elderly had a longer length of hospitalization, experiencing pancreatitis and a higher probability of developing moderate/severe pancreatitis. In multivariate and univariate analysis, prolonged cannulation time was found to be an independent risk factor in patients ≥75 years of age. Conclusions: This study showed that while ERCP-related complication rates in elderly patients are comparable to younger patients, it can be associated with worse outcomes following the complication and prolonged length of hospitalization.