RESUMO
Esophagectomy is an important cornerstone in the management of esophageal cancer. Post-operative feeding options in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy include nasojejunal tube (NJT), feeding jejunostomy, and direct oral feeding. NJT is traditionally placed endoscopically or under fluoroscopic guidance. In this case report we present an alternate technique for NJT placement. A 55-year-old male presented to our clinic with dysphagia. On esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) tumor was noted. A diagnosis of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma was made on biopsy. The patient received eight cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX), following which an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was carried out. This case report highlights the technical aspects and potential pitfalls of placing NJT in patients undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy without the use of endoscopy or fluoroscopic guidance. Direct oral feeding after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy may lead to suboptimal caloric provision while feeding jejunostomy is associated with complications such as dermatitis, wound infection, and intestinal obstruction. On the other hand, endoscopic or fluoroscopic insertion of NJT can expose the anastomosis to potentially harmful mechanical forces. NJT can be easily placed using our technique in patients undergoing hybrid Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The safety of this technique can be investigated by further studies.
RESUMO
Purpose: Advancements in gastrointestinal surgery have directed attention toward optimizing recovery, including through the use of feeding methods that reduce prolonged postoperative hospital stays, complications, and mortality, among other undesirable outcomes. This study's primary goals were to identify current peer-reviewed literature reporting the postoperative outcomes of elective bowel surgery and to evaluate the clinical evidence of patients' tolerance to oral feeding following elective bowel surgery. Methods: An exhaustive literature search was conducted via PubMed and Scopus. The search results were screened for potential articles, and articles were assessed for eligibility based on prespecified eligibility criteria. The data were synthesized, and the results were reported and discussed thematically. Results: The database search yielded 1,667 articles, from which 18 randomized controlled trials were chosen for inclusion in this study. This study included 874 early oral feeding (EOF) patients, 865 traditional oral feeding patients, and 91 patients whose postoperative care was unspecified. Data synthesis was done, and meta-analyses were conducted. The results showed that EOF patients required a significantly shorter time to tolerate a solid diet and had shorter hospital stays. In addition, bowel function was restored earlier in EOF groups. Conclusion: The results show good tolerance to EOF, shorter hospitalizations, and faster restoration of bowel function, suggesting that EOF after elective bowel surgery is relatively safe. However, further studies with similar baseline conditions should be conducted to verify these results.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Providing adequate nutrition in the management of preterm infants has been challenging. The objective of this secondary analysis of data from the randomized trial comparing "less invasive surfactant therapy (LISA) with InSurE method of surfactant administration" is to demonstrate the feasibility of early total enteral feeding (ETEF) in hemodynamically stable preterm neonates on respiratory support and to examine the factors associated with failure of ETEF. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing "LISA versus InSurE among preterm infants between 26 and 34 weeks of gestation" enrolled 150 infants with 117 being hemodynamically stable. ETEF without any parenteral supplementation was started on day 1 of life using the mother's own milk (MoM) or donor human milk (<32 weeks of GA) and MoM or preterm formula (33-34 weeks of GA). The data were analyzed to assess the proportion of babies developing feed intolerance and/or necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and factors associated with failure of ETEF. All Infants were assessed for the day of attainment of full enteral feeding defined as receiving and tolerating 150 mL/kg of enteral feeds per day. RESULTS: Out of these 117 babies, 102 tolerated ETEF, and 15 had one or more episodes of FI requiring total parenteral nutrition, but none developed NEC till discharge or death. On the assessment of possible factors associated with ETEF failure, there were no differences in baseline characteristics but statistically significantly increased incidence of culture-positive sepsis as well as the requirement of antibiotic therapy for possible sepsis (early as well as late-onset sepsis) in babies with failure of ETEF. The babies who tolerated ETEF achieved full enteral feeding (150 mL/kg/day) significantly earlier (5.48 ± 1.1 days) compared to those with ETEF failure (7 ± 3.4 days) (p 0.001). The time to regain birth weight was earlier in the ETEF group without significant differences in growth parameters. There was also a reduction in the duration of hospital stay in babies who tolerated ETEF, but both these results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: ETEF is feasible in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome who are on respiratory support. It resulted in earlier attainment of full enteral feeds and decreased the incidence of sepsis with reduced antibiotic usage.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety study of percutaneous gastroscopic gastrostomy in patients after ventriculoperitoneal shunt. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of neurosurgical patients who underwent VPS and PEG at our hospital between January 2012 and November 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups: VPS group and VPS followed by PEG gruop. Patients received routine antibiotic prophylaxis before the procedure, continued for 48 hours. Follow-up included monitoring immediate complications, particularly wound infection, intracranial infection, neurologic status deterioration, and shunt dysfunction. Routine follow-up visits were conducted post-discharge. RESULTS: In the VPS group (n = 778), the incidence of intracranial infection was 3.08%. Among patients with PEG after VPS, the time interval between procedures ranged from 13 to 685 days. The mean follow-up period was 22 (1-77) months, with no deaths or further complications. CONCLUSION: Performing PEG more than 13 days after VPS does not significantly increase the risk of intracranial infections or PEG-associated infections, making it a relatively safe procedure.
RESUMO
Background: There are no guidelines regarding enteral feeding (EF) of infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) during and shortly after therapeutic hypothermia; consequently, clinical practice is, to date, still variable. The objective of this study is to assess whether a minimal EF strategy during therapeutic hypothermia may be associated with a shorter time to full EF of infants with HIE and to identify the clinical variables that independently affect the time to full EF. Methods: A retrospective study, covering the period from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2022 was performed at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, which compared infants with HIE who received minimal EF during therapeutic hypothermia with those who did not. Results: Seventy-eight infants received minimal EF during therapeutic hypothermia, while 75 did not. Infants who were fed reached full EF significantly faster than those who were not. Moreover, they received parenteral nutrition and maintained central venous lines for a shorter time. A multivariate analysis, taking into account the variable of clinical severity, confirmed that minimal EF is an independent beneficial factor for reaching full EF in a shorter time and mechanical ventilation and seizures are independent factors for a longer time to full EF. Conclusions: Minimal EF during therapeutic hypothermia is associated with a shorter time to full EF in stable infants with HIE. Further prospective studies are needed to better define the enteral nutrition strategy for infants during therapeutic hypothermia, regardless of the severity of clinical conditions.
RESUMO
Introduction: Preterm birth is a growing problem worldwide. Staying at a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after birth is critical for the survival of preterm infants whose feeding often requires the use of nasogastric enteral feeding tubes (NEFT). These can be colonized by hospital-associated pathobionts that can access the gut of the preterm infants through this route. Since the gut microbiota is the most impactful factor on maturation of the immune system, any disturbance in this may condition their health. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the impact of NEFT-associated microbial communities on the establishment of the gut microbiota in preterm infants. Material and methods: A metataxonomic analysis of fecal and NEFT-related samples obtained during the first 2 weeks of life of preterm infants was performed. The potential sharing of strains isolated from the same set of samples of bacterial species involved in NICU's outbreaks, was assessed by Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) genotyping. Results: In the samples taken 48â h after birth (NEFT-1 and Me/F1), Staphylococcus spp. was the most abundant genera (62% and 14%, respectively) and it was latter displaced to 5.5% and 0.45%, respectively by Enterobacteriaceae. Significant differences in beta diversity were detected in NEFT and fecal samples taken at day 17 after birth (NEFT-3 and F3) (p = 0.003 and p = 0.024, respectively). Significant positive correlations were found between the most relevant genera detected in NEFT-3 and F3. 28% of the patients shared at least one RAPD-PCR profile in fecal and NEFT samples and 11% of the total profiles were found at least once simultaneously in NEFT and fecal samples from the same patient. Conclusion: The results indicate a parallel bacterial colonization of the gut of preterm neonates and the NEFTs used for feeding, potentially involving strain sharing between these niches. Moreover, the same bacterial RAPD profiles were found in neonates hospitalized in different boxes, suggesting a microbial transference within the NICU environment. This study may assist clinical staff in implementing best practices to mitigate the spread of pathogens that could threaten the health of preterm infants.
RESUMO
The practice of administering blended food via enteral feeding tubes has been growing in popularity in recent years. Concerns have been raised as this practice was perceived to increase risk of gastrointestinal intolerance, allergic reactions, nutritional insufficiency, tube blockages, and infection compared with using commercial enteral feed (CEF), the gold standard, as well as risk of litigation against the professional due to their support of practice that is not evidence-based. However, research has shown that the physical, social and emotional benefits from receiving blended diet may outweigh the previously suggested risks. Guidance has been updated to encourage discussions around blended diet while informing the tube-fed individuals, families and carers of potential risks, potential benefits, barriers, considerations for training, safety and contraindications.
Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , DietaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Extremely preterm infants (EPIs) frequently encounter challenges in feeding due to their underdeveloped digestive systems. Attaining full enteral feeding at the earliest possible stage can facilitate the removal of vascular catheters and decrease catheter-related complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comprising 145 extremely preterm infants with a gestational age < 28 weeks who underwent non-invasive mechanical ventilation at Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital between January 2019 and June 2020. The KMC group received standard nursing care along with KMC, while the control group received standard nursing care without KMC. KMC initiation took place three weeks after admission and continued for a period of two weeks or more while maintaining stable vital signs. We evaluated the rate of exclusive breastmilk feeding within 24 h prior to discharge and the time to full enteral feeding throughout hospitalization. Additionally, we conducted a multiple linear regression analysis to identify the independent factors associated with exclusive breastmilk feeding rates and the time to full enteral feeding. RESULTS: The KMC group exhibited a significantly higher rate of exclusive breastmilk feeding in the 24 h before discharge in comparison to the Non-KMC group (52.8% vs. 31.5%, OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.24, 4.78). Moreover, the KMC group achieved full enteral feeding in a shorter duration than the Non-KMC group (43.1 ± 9.6 days vs. 48.7 ± 6.9 days, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that KMC was an independent protective factor associated with improved exclusive breastmilk feeding rates (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.24, 4.78) and a reduction in the time to full enteral feeding (ß -5.35, p < 0.001) in extremely preterm infants. CONCLUSION: Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) can expedite the achievement of full enteral feeding and enhance exclusive breastmilk feeding rates in extremely preterm infants receiving non-invasive assisted ventilation. These findings highlight the beneficial effects of KMC on the feeding outcomes of this vulnerable population, underscoring the importance of implementing KMC as a part of comprehensive care for extremely preterm infants.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Nutrição Enteral , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Método Canguru , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Masculino , Ventilação não Invasiva , Leite Humano , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a prevalent and hard-to-treat condition in older adults. enteral feeding is common in acute and long-term care. Data regarding the prognosis of patients receiving enteral feeding in geriatric medical settings is lacking. Such data is important for decision-making and preliminary instructions for patients, caregivers, and physicians. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and risk factors for mortality among older adults admitted to a geriatric medical center receiving or starting enteral nutrition (EN). METHODS: A cohort retrospective study, conducted from 2019 to 2021. Patients admitted to our geriatric medical center who received EN were included. Data was collected from electronic medical records including demographic, clinical, and blood tests, duration of enteral feeding, Norton scale, and Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire score. Mortality was assessed during and after hospitalization. Data were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify the variables most significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 9169 patients admitted, 124 (1.35%) received enteral feeding tubes. More than half of the patients (50.8%) had polypharmacy (over 8 medications), 62% suffered from more than 10 chronic illnesses and the majority of patients (122/124) had a Norton scale under 14. Most of the patients had a nasogastric tube (NGT) (95/124) and 29 had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs). Ninety patients (72%) died during the trial period with a median follow-up of 12.7 months (0.1-62.9 months) and one-year mortality was 16% (20/124). Associations to mortality were found for marital status, oxygen use, and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW). Age and poly-morbidity were not associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving EN at a geriatric medical center mortality was lower than in a general hospital. The prognosis remained grim with high mortality rates and low quality of life. This data should aid decision-making and promote preliminary instructions.
Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Desnutrição/terapia , Desnutrição/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Intubação Gastrointestinal/métodos , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Avaliação NutricionalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Optimal nutritional support is essential to the recovery and improved outcomes of burn patients. This review aims to explore existing literature to evaluate nutrition assessment tools, feeding formulations' caloric predictive ability, timing of initiation of feeding, optimal nutritional composition, and caloric intake in burn patients. METHODS: Three databases were searched to glean studies investigating nutrition in acute severe adult burn patient populations in four areas: outcomes based on feeding type and timing, the caloric predictability of nutritional assessment tools, outcomes associated with the composition of feeding formulas, and considerations related to caloric intake. Outcomes of interest included the effects of nutritional assessments using feeding type, nutritional administration timing, formula composition, and caloric intake on mortality rate, length of stay, and infection. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included. Nutritional assessment tools were determined to over- or underestimate resting energy expenditure (REE). Milner was the most accurate alternative to indirect calorimetry. Early enteral nutrition in burn patients within 24 hours of admission was preferred. 5 studies evaluated micronutrients and yielded variable results. Low-fat high-carbohydrate diets were the ideal macronutrient composition. Burn patients were shown to receive lower caloric intake than recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed that while nutritional assessment tools tend to inaccurately estimate REE in burn patients, the ideal alternative to indirect calorimetry is the Milner equation. Several new equations may be worthy alternatives but require further validation. Enteral feeding should be initiated within the first 24 hours of burn injury whenever possible and should contain a high-carbohydrate/low-fat composition.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients can experience torpid hospitalization that is often characterized by malnutrition. In this setting, enteral feeding may facilitate improvement in nutritional status. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes between elderly (age of ≥65 years old) and nonelderly (age of <65 years old) patients undergoing elective enteral access placement. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent enteral access procedures between 2018 and 2020 at a tertiary care facility were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in baseline characteristics between nonelderly and elderly patients were adjusted using entropy-balanced weights. Subsequently, multivariate logistic and linear regression models were developed to evaluate the association between elderly status and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Overall, 914 patients with enteral access met the inclusion criteria, of whom 471 (51.5%) were elderly. Elderly patients more commonly received percutaneous gastrostomy and had a higher burden of comorbidities as measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index than nonelderly patients. Multivariate risk adjustment generated a strongly balanced distribution of baseline covariates between patient groups. After adjustment, despite no significant association with inhospital mortality, reoperation, or time to feeding goals, elderly status was linked to an approximately 8-day reduction in length of stay (95% CI, -14.28 to -2.30; P = .007) and significantly lower odds of total parenteral nutrition (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94; P = .026) and nonelective readmission (AOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86; P = .003). In addition, elderly status was associated with significantly greater odds of nonhome discharge (AOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.17-2.13; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Despite having more comorbidities than their nonelderly counterparts, elderly patients experienced favorable nutritional and perioperative outcomes after enteral access placement.
RESUMO
Providing adequate and balanced nutrition for preterm infants, especially extremely/very preterm infants, is the material basis for promoting their normal growth and development and improving long-term prognosis. Enteral nutrition is the best way to feed preterm infants. Previous systematic reviews have shown that using evidence-based standardized feeding management strategies can effectively promote the establishment of full enteral feeding, reduce the duration of parenteral nutrition, improve the nutritional outcomes of preterm infants, and not increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis or death. Based on relevant research in China and overseas, the consensus working group has developed 20 recommendations in 5 aspects including the goal of enteral nutrition, transitioning to enteral nutrition, stable growth period enteral nutrition, supplementation of special nutrients, and monitoring of enteral nutrition for preterm infants, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. The aim is to provide recommendations for healthcare professionals involved in the management of enteral nutrition for preterm infants, in order to improve the clinical outcomes of preterm infants.
Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Humanos , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Recém-Nascido , ConsensoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition may affect risks of gastrointestinal bleeding, pneumonia and mortality in critically ill patients and may also modify the effects of pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis. We undertook post hoc analyses of the stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit trial to assess for any associations and interactions between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole. METHODS: Extended Cox models with time-varying co-variates and competing events were used to assess potential associations, adjusted for baseline severity of illness. Potential interactions between daily enteral nutrition and allocation to pantoprazole on outcomes were similarly assessed. RESULTS: Enteral nutrition was associated with lower risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (cause-specific hazard ratio [HR]: 0.29, 95% confidence interval: [CI] 0.19-0.44, p < .001), higher risk of pneumonia (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82, p = .003), and lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.18-0.27, p < .001). Enteral nutrition with allocation to pantoprazole was associated with a lower risk of mortality (HR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.21-0.35, p < .001), similar to enteral nutrition with allocation to placebo (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.13-0.23, p < .001). Allocation to pantoprazole with no enteral nutrition had little effect on mortality (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.63-1.09, p = .179), whilst allocation to pantoprazole and receipt of enteral nutrition was mostly compatible with increased all-cause mortality (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.99-1.64, p = .061). The test of interaction between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole treatment allocation for all-cause mortality was statistically significant (p = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Enteral nutrition was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia and a reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. The interaction between pantoprazole and enteral nutrition suggesting an increased risk of mortality requires further study.
RESUMO
The choice of a refeeding strategy is essential in the inpatient treatment of Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Oral nutrition is usually the first choice, but enteral nutrition through the use of a Nasogastric Tube (NGT) often becomes necessary in hospitalized patients. The literature provides mixed results on the efficacy of this method in weight gain, and there is a scarcity of studies researching its psychological correlates. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of oral versus enteral refeeding strategies in inpatients with AN, focusing on Body Mass Index (BMI) increase and treatment satisfaction, alongside assessing personality traits. We analyzed data from 241 inpatients, comparing a group of treated vs. non-treated individuals, balancing confounding factors using propensity score matching, and applied regression analysis to matched groups. The findings indicate that enteral therapy significantly enhances BMI without impacting treatment satisfaction, accounting for the therapeutic alliance. Personality traits showed no significant differences between patients undergoing oral or enteral refeeding. The study highlights the clinical efficacy of enteral feeding in weight gain, supporting its use in severe AN cases when oral refeeding is inadequate without adversely affecting patient satisfaction or being influenced by personality traits.
Assuntos
Anorexia Nervosa , Índice de Massa Corporal , Nutrição Enteral , Intubação Gastrointestinal , Satisfação do Paciente , Pontuação de Propensão , Humanos , Anorexia Nervosa/terapia , Anorexia Nervosa/psicologia , Feminino , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem , Aumento de Peso , Masculino , AdolescenteRESUMO
Rationale: Enteral nutrition is beneficial for stroke patients with oral intake difficulties. However, it is time consuming and may interfere with routine medical care. Therefore, there is a clinical benefit if enteral nutrition can be safely administered in a short time. Although our retrospective study showed the safety of rapid administration, it remains unclear whether rapid administration of enteral nutrition is as safe as conventional administration. Aim: The randomized study of Enteral Nutrition with Rapid versus conventional administration in acute stroke patients (Rapid EN trial) aims to clarify the safety of rapid feeding of enteral nutrition compared with conventional feeding. Methods and design: This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point clinical trial. Eligible criteria include acute stroke patients who have difficulty with oral intake defined as severe altered consciousness (Japan Coma Scale 10-300) or modified water swallowing test <4. The target enrollment is 700 patients, with 350 patients receiving rapid enteral nutrition at a rate of 100 mL in 5 min (Rapid EN group) and 350 patients receiving conventional enteral nutrition at a rate of 100 mL in 30 min (Conventional EN group). Study outcome: The primary outcome is the incidence of one or more complications of vomiting or diarrhea or pneumonia within 7 days would be non-inferior in the rapid EN group compared to the conventional EN group. Secondary outcomes were total time spent on enteral nutrition within 7 days from enteral nutrition, the incidence of vomiting, diarrhea and pneumonia within 3 or 7 days, and the rate of favorable clinical outcome. Discussion: Since no previous reports have focused on the speed of administration, we felt it was necessary to prove the safety of rapid administration. If this study shows positive results, it will not only benefit patients, but also reduce the burden of medical care. We believe this study is novel and will be useful in clinical practice. Clinical trial registration: https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/s/detail/um?trial_id=UMIN000046610 Identifier UMIN000046610.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: When commencing enteral feeding, patients and families will want to know the likelihood of returning to an oral diet. There is a paucity of data on the prognosis of patients with gastrostomies. We describe a large dataset of patients, which identifies factors influencing gastrostomy removal and assesses the likelihood of the patient having at home enteral nutrition. METHODS: Retrospective data was collected on patients from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals who had received a gastrostomy and had outpatient enteral feeding between January 2016 and December 2019. Demographic data, indication and outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 451 patients were assessed, median age: 67.7. 183/451(40.6%) gastrostomies were for head and neck cancer, 88/451 (19.5%) for stroke, 28/451 (6.2%) for Motor Neuron Disease, 32/451 (7.1%) for other neurodegenerative causes, 120/451 (26.6%) other. Of the 31.2% who had their gastrostomy removed within 3 years, head and neck cancer was the most common indication (58.3%) followed by stroke (10.2%), Motor Neuron Disease (7.1%) and other neurodegenerative diseases (3.1%). Gastrostomy removal was significantly influenced by age, place of residence, and having head and neck cancer (p < 0.05). There was the greatest likelihood of removal within the first year (24%). 70.5% had enteral feeding at home. CONCLUSION: This large cohort study demonstrates 31.2% of patients had their gastrostomy removed within 3 years. Head and neck cancer patients, younger age and residing at home can help positively predict removal. Most patients manage their feeding at home rather than a nursing home. This study provides new information on gastrostomy outcomes when counselling patients to provide realistic expectations.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Nutrição Enteral , Gastrostomia , Humanos , Gastrostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Nutrição Enteral/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Doença dos Neurônios Motores/terapia , Adulto , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/terapiaRESUMO
The nutrition of preterm infants remains contaminated by wrong beliefs that reflect inexactitudes and perpetuate old practices. In this narrative review, we report current evidence in preterm neonates and in preterm neonates undergoing surgery. Convictions that necrotizing enterocolitis is reduced by the delay in introducing enteral feeding, a slow advancement in enteral feeds, and the systematic control of residual gastric volumes, should be abandoned. On the contrary, these practices prolong the time to reach full enteral feeding. The length of parenteral nutrition should be as short as possible to reduce the infectious risk. Intrauterine growth restriction, hemodynamic and respiratory instability, and patent ductus arteriosus should be considered in advancing enteral feeds, but they must not translate into prolonged fasting, which can be equally dangerous. Clinicians should also keep in mind the risk of refeeding syndrome in case of high amino acid intake and inadequate electrolyte supply, closely monitoring them. Conversely, when preterm infants undergo surgery, nutritional strategies are still based on retrospective studies and opinions rather than on randomized controlled trials. Finally, this review also highlights how the use of adequately fortified human milk is strongly recommended, as it offers unique benefits for immune and gastrointestinal health and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Leite Humano , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Enterocolite Necrosante/prevenção & controle , Nutrição Parenteral , Alimentos FortificadosRESUMO
Background and aim: Monitoring of gastric residual volume (GRV) to assess for enteral feeding intolerance is common practice in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting; however, evidence to support the practice is lacking. The aim of this study was: (i) to gain a perspective of current practice in adult ICUs in the UK around enteral feeding and monitoring of GRV, (ii) to characterise the threshold value used for a high GRV in clinical practice, (iii) to describe the impact of GRV monitoring on enteral feeding provision and (iv) to inform future research into the clinical value of GRV measurement in the adult ICU population. Methods: A web-based survey was sent to all UK adult ICUs. The survey consisted of questions pertaining to (i) nutritional assessment and enteral feeding practices, (ii) enteral feeding intolerance and GRV monitoring and (iii) management of raised GRV. Results: Responses were received from 101 units. Ninety-eight percent of units reported routinely measuring GRV, with 86% of ICUs using GRV to define enteral feeding intolerance. Threshold values for a high GRV varied from 200 to 1000 ml with frequency of measurement also differing greatly from 2 to 12 hourly. Initiation of pro-kinetic medication was the most common treatment for a high GRV. Fifty-two percent of respondents stated that volume of GRV would influence their decision to stop enteral feeds a lot or very much. Only 28% of units stated that they had guidelines for the technique for monitoring GRV. Conclusions: Measurement of GRV is the most common method of determining enteral feeding intolerance in adult ICUs in the UK. The practice continues despite evidence of poor validity and reproducibility of this measurement. Further research should be undertaken into the benefit of ongoing GRV measurements in the adult ICU population and alternative markers of enteral feeding intolerance.
RESUMO
This study investigated the effects of exclusive donor milk or formula in the first 7 days after birth, on the time to full enteral feeding, growth, and morbidity of adverse events related to premature infants. This was a retrospective study carried out from July 2014 to December 2019 at the Department of Neonatology of Shanghai Children's Hospital. All infants with a birth weight < 1,500 g and a gestational age ≤ 32 who received exclusive donor milk or formula in the first 7 days after birth were included in this study. The time to full enteral feeding (defined as 150 mL/kg) in the donor milk group was significantly shorter than in the formula group (18 vs. 22 days, p = 0.01). Donated breast milk was also associated with a lower incidence of NEC (4.4 vs. 7%, p < 0.01), ROP (3.8 vs. 13.2%, p < 0.01), and culture-confirmed sepsis (11 vs. 22.6%, p < 0.01). Using donated breast milk instead of current formula milk for early enteral nutrition can shorten the time to full enteral feeding and reduce the incidence of NEC, ROP, and sepsis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Time to full enteral feeding is the time when neonates start to receive all of their prescribed nutrition as milk feeds. Delayed to achieve full enteral feeding had resulted in short- and long-term physical and neurological sequelae. However, there are limited studies to assess the time to full enteral feeding and its predictors among very low birth-weight neonates in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the time to full enteral feeding and its predictors among very low birth-weight neonates admitted to comprehensive specialized hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A multi-center institutional-based retrospective follow-up study was conducted among 409 VLBW neonates from March 1, 2019 to February 30, 2023. A simple random sampling method was used to select study participants. Data were entered into EpiData version 4.2 and then exported into STATA version 16 for analysis. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve together with the log-rank test was fitted to test for the presence of differences among groups. Proportional hazard assumptions were checked using a global test. Variables having a p- value < 0.25 in the bivariable Cox-proportional hazard model were candidates for multivariable analysis. An adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) was computed to report the strength of association, and variables having a P-value < 0.05 at the 95% confidence interval were considered statistically significant predictor variables. RESULT: The median time to full enteral feeding was 10 (CI: 10-11) days. Very Low Birth-Weight (VLBW) neonates who received a formula feeding (AHR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.96), gestational age of 32-37 weeks (AHR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.23, 2.23), without Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) (AHR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.65, 2.84), and single birth outcome (AHR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.88) were statistically significant variables with time to full enteral feeding. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This study found that the median time to full enteral feeding was high. Type of feeding, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), Gestational Age (GA) at birth, and birth outcome were predictor variables. Special attention and follow-up are needed for those VLBW neonates with NEC, had a GA of less than 32 weeks, and had multiple birth outcomes.