The utility of capsule endoscopy in the phenotype of Crohn's disease. Data from England 2016-2021.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Isolated small bowel Crohn's disease (SBCD) is reported to have a worse prognosis compared to other CD phenotypes. The aim of this study was to understand the correlation between Isolated SBCD and ileocolonic disease with blood and faecal biomarkers and also to identify differences in outcome and management between the two phenotypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ileocolonic or isolated small bowel Crohn's Disease (SBCD) were identified from an existing capsule endoscopy (CE) database. Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI), biomarkers: c-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC), Lewis score and findings on CE and subsequent follow up data were collected. SPSS was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: In total 248 patients were included in the study. Patients were split into two groups- Isolated SBCD with 178 patient (median age 44 years (IQR 31-56); 41.5 % male) and Ileocolonic Crohn's with 70 patients (median age 31 years (IQR 22.7-49); 31.5 % male). A new diagnosis of SBCD was made in 38.7 % (n = 96), whilst 60.0 % (n = 144) had established CD. Patients with ileocolonic disease had a higher HBI in comparison to isolated SBCD [HBI = 7 (IQR 5-10) vs HBI = 6(IQR 4-9); P = 0.04 ]. There was no significant difference in the FC levels between isolated SBCD and ileocolonic disease [136ug/g (IQR 53.8-363.3) vs 171ug/g (IQR 68.5-485.5); p = 0.98]. In isolated SBCD group, 30.3 % (n = 54) CE showed proximal disease, 96 % (n = 171) showed distal disease and 26.4 % (n = 47) showed extensive disease. SBCE was superior to MRI at diagnosing proximal SBCD (P < 0.01). On multivariate logistic regression, we did not identify any predictors of disease severity defined as Lewis score > 790. Following SBCE, 68.5 % (n = 170) of the total patients had a management change. This included commencement or dose escalation of corticosteroids in 123 (49.5 %) patients, azathioprine in 80 (33.3 %) patients, methotrexate in 22 (9.1 %) patients and biological therapy in 110 (44.3 %) patients. HBI predicted a change in management (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CE is an important modality for the diagnosis of active SBCD. It also helps guide treatment in patients identified with active disease.

Dual burden of infectious and chronic disease in low-resource U.S. communities: examining relationships between infection, adiposity, and inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Rising global obesity rates are linked with inflammation and associated morbidities. These negative outcomes are generally more common in low-resource communities within high-income countries; however, it is unclear how frequent infectious disease exposures in these settings may influence the relationship between adiposity and inflammation. AIM: We test associations between adiposity measures and distinct forms of inflammation among adults (n = 80) living in low-resource U.S. communities experiencing high levels of obesity and pathogen exposure. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adiposity measures included BMI and percent body fat. Inflammation measures included systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP]) and localised intestinal inflammation (faecal calprotectin [FC]). The relationship between a condition characterised by elevated inflammation (Helicobacter pylori infection) and adiposity was also considered. RESULTS: Adiposity was not significantly related to FC concentration. However, both adiposity measures were positively related with odds of CRP elevation and H. pylori infection was associated with significantly lower adiposity measures (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For this disadvantaged U.S. sample, the association between adiposity and inflammation varies by the systemic/localised nature of inflammation and the likely underlying cause of inflammation. Defining these associations will improve understanding of how rising obesity rates shape long-term health inequities, with implications for more effective intervention design.

Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: a practical guide.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a costly condition in terms of morbidity and healthcare utilization, with an increasing prevalence now approaching 1% in the Western world. Endoscopic assessment of IBD remains the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation of treatment response and determination of post-operative recurrence, but is expensive and invasive. Biomarkers can facilitate non-invasive disease assessment, with C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin as the most widely available biomarkers in current clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes the evidence for their use in both UC and CD and offers practical guidance for healthcare providers taking into account the limitations of biomarker interpretation. We present evidence for the future use of novel biomarkers in IBD and discuss how biomarker discovery could deliver the goal of precision medicine in IBD.

Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: a practical guide Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a term used to describe two conditions, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). These two diseases cause inflammation of the bowel, which can lead to diarrhoea, abdominal pain and bleeding from the back passage. The best way of assessing how active a patient's IBD is, is by performing a camera test called a colonoscopy. However, having a colonoscopy is inconvenient, comes with some risks to the patient, and uses a lot of healthcare resources. 'Biomarkers' are proteins detectable in body fluids (such as blood, poo and urine) which can give information to medical staff about how active a patient's disease is, without the need for colonoscopy. In this article, we give guidance about how best to use these tests, and when they might not be so useful. We also discuss new biomarkers and ways in which they could be used in the future to predict which treatments patients might respond to best.

Calprotectin: two sides of the same coin.

Calprotectin (CLP) is a calcium-binding protein produced by neutrophils and monocytes in the course of inflammation. Today, the role of faecal CLP in chronic IBD is well known, but in recent years attention has shifted towards circulating CLP. In fact, this molecule can be measured in different biological fluids: blood, saliva and urine, using different analytic methods that are described in this review. Furthermore, different data confirm the relevant role of serum CLP in autoimmune diseases. In this review we will highlight the correlation between high levels of circulating CLP and specific autoantibodies of major autoimmune pathologies paving the way to the employment of CLP measurement as useful biomarker for monitoring outcome in different pathologies.

Faecal calprotectin as an inflammatory biomarker to distinguish between bacterial and viral causes of childhood diarrhoea in Indian settings.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the value of faecal calprotectin (f-CP) in distinguishing between bacterial and viral aetiologies of infective diarrhoea in children attending a tertiary care hospital in Central India. METHODS: Stool samples from children aged 3 months to 10 years who had acute or persistent diarrhoea were processed for microscopy, bacterial culture, and viral antigen detection (Rotavirus and Norovirus). The remaining samples, as well as stool samples from 20 healthy controls, were tested for f-CP using the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Among 48 patients, 21 (43.7%) had bacterial diarrhoea, 14 (29.2%) had viral diarrhoea, and 13 (27.1%) had an unidentified aetiology. The median f-CP values were significantly (p â€‹= â€‹0.004) higher in children with bacterial diarrhoea (75.2 â€‹µg/g; IQR-18.75-239.15) than in children with viral diarrhoea (75.2 â€‹µg/g; IQR-123.5-1987.5). Bacterial aetiology could be reliably predicted at the optimum f-CP concentrations of >541 â€‹µg/g and >238.4 â€‹µg/g in children aged 1 and 1-4 years, with an area under the curve of 0.767 and 0.867, respectively, using receiver-operator characteristic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Faecal calprotectin could reliably distinguish between bacterial and viral aetiologies of diarrhoea in children aged up to four years, but at relatively higher age-specified cut off values.

Assessing the Clinical and Endoscopic Efficacy of Extended Treatment Duration with Different Doses of Mesalazine for Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis beyond 8 Weeks of Induction.

Introduction: High-strength mesalazine formulations play an important role in providing a convenient option to increase the dose in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and therefore avoiding the switch to another therapeutic class. Higher doses of mesalazine may be required during periods of remission in order to prevent relapse. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate clinical outcomes of three mesalazine maintenance doses adapted for post induction response. Methods: In this post hoc analysis, 675 UC patients entered an open-label extension study for a total of 38 weeks (including 8-12 week induction period with 3.2 g/day mesalazine). After the induction period, they were separated into three groups: remitters (in clinical and endoscopic remission), responders (decrease in Partial Mayo Clinic Score of ≥2 points and ≥30% from week 0), and nonresponders (failed to achieve endoscopic or clinical response at week 8) and received 1.6 g/day, 3.2 g/day, or 4.8 g/day of mesalazine (using a new 1,600 mg mesalazine tablet), respectively. Results: 133/202 (65.8%), 108/274 (39.4%), and 59/199 (29.6%) patients achieved clinical and endoscopic remission at week 38 with 1.6 g/day, 3.2 g/day, and 4.8 g/day, respectively. At week 38, 142/202 (70.3%), 93/274 (33.9%), and 61/199 (30.7%) patients achieved clinical remission (stool score of 0 and rectal bleeding score of 0) with 1.6 g/day, 3.2 g/day, and 4.8 g/day, respectively. Conclusions: Patients partially responding or not responding to an initial induction dose of 3.2 g/day mesalazine could benefit from an extended treatment period at the same dose, or an increase to 4.8 g/day in an attempt to achieve combined clinical and endoscopic remission.

Mesalazine dose modification based on faecal calprotectin levels in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission. / Modificación de la dosis de mesalazina en función de los niveles de calprotectina fecal en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa en remisión clínica.

BACKGROUND: Faecal calprotectin (FC) shows an excellent correlation with endoscopic and histological activity of ulcerative colitis (UC) and it is the best predictor of clinical relapse. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of modifying the dose of mesalazine based on FC levels, in clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective, single-centre study in UC patients in clinical remission while treated with mesalazine which dosage was decreased (DOWN) or increased (UP) according to FC levels. The main endpoint was the long-term maintenance of clinical remission. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were included (39 DOWN, 17 UP). In the DOWN group, the median baseline dose of mesalazine was 3.6g/day and the median baseline FC was 36µg/g. After a median follow-up of 22 months, 28% required rescue therapy. The cumulative relapse-free survival after tapering was 91% and 82% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In the UP group, the median baseline dose of mesalazine was 2.4g/day, with a median baseline FC of 524µg/g. After a median follow-up of 12 months, 29% required rescue therapy. The cumulative relapse-free survival after dose increase was 86% and 72% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalazine dose modification based on FC monitoring seems to be a safe strategy in patients with UC in clinical remission, with a probability of clinical relapse around 20% at two years.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: Diagnostic performance of faecal calprotectin in distinguishing inflammatory bowel disease from irritable bowel syndrome in adults.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often overlap with those of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of faecal calprotectin in distinguishing patients with IBD from those with IBS METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases up to 1 January 2023. Studies were included if they assessed the diagnostic performance of faecal calprotectin in distinguishing IBD from IBS (defined according to the Rome criteria) using colonoscopy with histology or radiology as reference standard in adults. We calculated summary sensitivity and specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effect bivariate model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies II. RESULTS: We included 17 studies with a total of 1956 patients. The summary sensitivity was 85.8% (95% CI: 78.3-91), and the specificity was 91.7% (95% CI: 84.5-95.7). At a prevalence of IBD of 1%, the negative predictive value was 99.8%, while the positive predictive value was only 9%. Subgroup analyses showed a higher sensitivity in Western than in Eastern countries (88% vs 73%) and at a cut-off of ≤50 µg/g than at >50 µg/g (87% vs. 79%), with similar estimates of specificity. All studies were at "high" or "unclear" risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Faecal calprotectin is a reliable test in distinguishing patients with IBD from those with IBS. Faecal calprotectin seems to have a better sensitivity in Western countries and at a cut-off of ≤50 µg/g.

Microbial and immune faecal determinants in infants hospitalized with COVID-19 reflect bifidobacterial dysbiosis and immature intestinal immunity.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread rapidly worldwide, seriously endangering human health. Although SARS-CoV-2 had a lower impact on paediatric population, children with COVID-19 have been reported as suffering from gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms at a higher rate than adults. The aim of this work was to evaluate faeces as a source of potential biomarkers of severity in the paediatric population, with an emphasis on intestinal microbiota and faecal immune mediators, trying to identify possible dysbiosis and immune intestinal dysfunction associated with the risk of hospitalization. This study involved 19 patients with COVID-19 under 24 months of age hospitalized during the pandemic at 6 different hospitals in Spain, and it included a comparable age-matched healthy control group (n = 18). Patients and controls were stratified according to their age in two groups: newborns or young infants (from 0 to 3 months old) and toddlers (infants from 6 to 24 months old). To characterize microbial intestinal communities, sequencing with Illumina technology of total 16S rDNA amplicons and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) amplicons of bifidobacteria were used. Faecal calprotectin (FC) and a range of human cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors were measured in faecal samples using ELISA and a multiplex system. Significant reduction in the abundance of sequences belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria was found in those infants with COVID-19, as well as in the Bifidobacteriaceae family. A different pattern of bifidobacteria was observed in patients, mainly represented by lower percentages of Bifidobacterium breve, as compared with controls. In the group of hospitalized young infants, FC was almost absent compared to age-matched healthy controls. A lower prevalence in faecal excretion of immune factors in these infected patients was also observed. CONCLUSION:  Hospitalized infants with COVID-19 were depleted in some gut bacteria, such as bifidobacteria, in particular Bifidobacterium breve, which is crucial for the proper establishment of a functional intestinal microbiota, and important for the development of a competent immune system. Our results point to a possible immature immune system at intestine level in young infants infected by SARS-CoV2 requiring hospitalization. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Although SARS-CoV-2 had a lower impact on paediatric population, children with COVID-19 have been reported as suffering from gastrointestinal symptoms at a higher rate than adults. • Changes in microbial composition have been described in COVID-19 adult patients, although studies in children are limited. WHAT IS NEW: • The first evidence that hospitalized infants with COVID-19 during the pandemic had a depletion in bifidobacteria, particularly in Bifidobacterium breve, beneficial gut bacteria in infancy that are crucial for the proper establishment of a competent immune system. • In young infants (under 3 months of age) hospitalized with SARS-CoV2 infection, the aberrant bifidobacterial profile appears to overlap with a poor intestinal immune development as seen by calprotectin and the trend of immunological factors excreted in faeces.

Biological markers of disease activity in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic intestinal conditions of multifactorial aetiology including genetic susceptibility, immunological impairment, dysbiosis, and environmental factors. The diagnosis is based on both clinical and endoscopic features, wherein histopathological evaluation remains a gold diagnostic standard. However, fast, reliable, and non-invasive biological markers have been used for years for diagnosis as well as for disease activity monitoring. Currently, commonly used faecal calprotectin is the only biomarker approved and recommended by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO). Nonetheless, other biological markers discriminating between functional and organic bowel conditions have been widely studied. Therefore, the aim of this manuscript was to review new potential biomarkers of inflammation in IBD. The aim of this study was to review currently available biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and increased gut permeability in IBD.

Faecal calprotectin: Marker of intestinal inflammatory process in anorexia nervosa? A preliminary study.

PURPOSE: Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a serious and potentially lethal mental disorder characterised by a deliberate quest to reduce one's weight. It can have multiple physical and psychological consequences. The clinical presentation of AN can include gastrointestinal symptoms, however, the pathophysiology of these symptoms in the context of AN remains uncertain. It is hypothesised that patients with AN may have an increase in intestinal permeability, which could lead to an increase in faecal calprotectin (fCP), a marker of intestinal inflammation. No relation between AN and elevation of fCP has been previously described in literature. METHODS: Eight patients hospitalised for AN have a dosage of fCP. RESULTS: Calprotectine was found to be elevated in 50% of cases, with or without any underlying comorbid gastrointestinal disease. Only the duration of illness tended to be associated with the increase in fCP suggesting a greater alteration as a function related to the time of denutrition. CONCLUSION: Although these findings provide insights in the potential pathophysiology of gastrointestinal symptoms in AN, further studies that evaluate the factors associated with elevated fCP in patients with AN are needed.

Hepatobiliary system and intestinal injury in new coronavirus infection (COVID-19): A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: An important area of effective control of the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic is the study of the pathogenic features of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, including those based on assessing the state of the intestinal microbiota and permeability. AIM: To study the clinical features of the new COVID-19 in patients with mild and moderate severity at the stage of hospitalization, to determine the role of hepatobiliary injury, intestinal permeability disorders, and changes in the qualitative and quantitative composition of the microbiota in the development of systemic inflammation in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The study was performed in 80 patients with COVID-19, with an average age of 45 years, 19 of whom had mild disease, and 61 had moderate disease severity. The scope of the examination included traditional clinical, laboratory, biochemical, instrumental, and radiation studies, as well as original methods for studying microbiota and intestinal permeability. RESULTS: The clinical course of COVID-19 was studied, and the clinical and biochemical features, manifestations of systemic inflammation, and intestinal microbiome changes in patients with mild and moderate severity were identified. Intestinal permeability characteristics against the background of COVID-19 were evaluated by measuring levels of proinflammatory cytokines, insulin, faecal calprotectin, and zonulin. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the role of intestinal permeability and microbiota as the main drivers of gastroenterological manifestations and increased COVID-19 severity.

Chronic Inflammatory Intestinal Disorders in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal symptoms are common in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). HS patients may experience a broad spectrum of chronic inflammatory intestinal disorders (CIID), not exclusive to inflammatory bowel diseases, which are diagnosed by colonoscopy and intestinal biopsies. The frequency of CIID in patients with HS has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine the occurrence of CIID in HS and characterize this clinical population. Furthermore, the feasibility of using faecal calprotectin (FC) test or anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA) levels to assess the colonic inflammation of CIID in HS patients was investigated. METHODS: All newly diagnosed and untreated HS patients (n = 74) were referred to a gastroenterologist for FC followed by colonoscopy after informed consent. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count, nucleotide-binding oligomerization-domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2) polymorphism, and ASCA levels were measured. Patients were divided into HS-only and HS with CIID (HS + CIID) groups, based on the absence or presence of CIID. Laboratory and clinical parameters (age, gender, HS onset, clinical stage, family history, body mass index (BMI), smoking) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Thirteen patients complained gastrointestinal symptoms prior to any examination, including 11 in the HS + CIID group. The CIID frequency in HS was 28.4% (n = 21/74), based on colonoscopy and histology. Significantly more patients had severe disease state in the HS + CIID group compared with the HS-only group, and BMI was significantly lower in the HS + CIID group (28.20 ± 5.58 vs. 32.74 ± 6.45, p = 0.006). FC positivity occurred significantly more in HS + CIID patients compared with HS-only patients (90.48% vs. 3.77%, p < 0.001), and ASCA IgG levels were significantly elevated in HS + CIID patients (22.08 ± 23.07 vs. 8.41 ± 10.94 U/mL, p = 0.001). The FC test identified HS + CIID patients with 96.23% specificity and 91.3% sensitivity, while ASCA displayed 77.8% sensitivity and 76.3% specificity. Blood count, CRP, and the presence of NOD2 polymorphisms were indifferent between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A high frequency of CIID was detected in the examined HS population. The noninvasive FC test has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing CIID in HS patients. Concomitant CIID and HS may indicate the need for an early-start for biological treatment.

A Point-of-Care Faecal Test Combining Four Biomarkers Allows Avoidance of Normal Colonoscopies and Prioritizes Symptomatic Patients with a High Risk of Colorectal Cancer.

Most colonoscopies performed to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms detect only non-relevant pathologies. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a qualitative point-of-care (POC) test combining four biomarkers (haemoglobin, transferrin, calprotectin, and lactoferrin), a quantitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for haemoglobin, and a quantitative faecal calprotectin (FC) test in symptomatic patients prospectively recruited. Colorectal cancer (CRC), adenoma requiring surveillance, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), microscopic colitis, and angiodysplasia were considered significant pathologies. A total of 571 patients were included. Significant pathology was diagnosed in 118 (20.7%), including 30 CRC cases (5.3%). The POC test yielded the highest negative predictive values: 94.8% for a significant pathology and 100% for CRC or IBD if the four markers turned negative (36.8% of the patients). Negative predictive values of FIT, FC, and its combination for diagnosis of a significant pathology were 88.4%, 87.6%, and 90.8%, respectively. Moreover, the positive predictive value using the POC test was 82.3% for significant pathology when all biomarkers tested positive (6% of the patients), with 70.6% of these patients diagnosed with CRC or IBD. The AUC of the POC test was 0.801 (95%CI 0.754-0.848) for the diagnosis of a significant pathology. Therefore, this POC faecal test allows the avoidance of unnecessary colonoscopies and prioritizes high risk symptomatic patients.

Effects of anti-Inflammatory-antioxidant-rich diet and co-supplemented synbiotics intervention in patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis: a single-center, single-blind randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence has demonstrated that patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have dysbiotic gut microbiomes, and anti-inflammatory nutritional interventions can normalize this status. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of dietary intervention in patients with progressive forms of MS. METHODS: Seventy patients with three forms of progressive MS (primary-progressive, secondary-progressive, and progressive-relapsing) were randomly assigned into intervention (daily synbiotics capsule plus anti-inflammatory-antioxidant rich diet) or control (placebo capsule plus dietary recommendations) groups for four months. Faecal calprotectin level, Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI), Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), and anthropometric measurements were evaluated at baseline and trial cessation. Analysis of covariance was conducted and adjusted for age, gender, education level, family history & duration of MS, type of progressive MS, type of main drug, and physical activity. RESULTS: Sixty-nine participants were included in the final analysis (n of intervention = 34; n of control = 35). Synbiotics and dietary intervention significantly reduced Faecal calprotectin level after six months (110.5 ± 75.9-44.7 ± 49.3 É¥g/g, P < 0.001), and mean changes were statistically significant in comparison with control group. However, intervention did not elicit any change in the anthropometric measurements. CONCLUSION: Synbiotics supplementation and adherence to an anti-inflammatory-antioxidant-rich diet reduced intestinal inflammation and improved clinical manifestations in progressive forms of MS.Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: IRCT20141108019853N7..

Early MOnitoring of REsponse (MORE) to Golimumab Therapy: Results of a Multicentre, Prospective Observational Trial.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic goal of clinical remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is achieved after biological therapy only in 16-39%. Individualization of therapeutic intervention would benefit from prediction of early response. STUDY OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to assess golimumab (GLM) trough serum level of ≥2.5 µg/mL in combination with a reduction of faecal calprotectin (FC) of ≥50% at week 6 compared to baseline to predict clinical response at week 26 after regular GLM intake. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe active UC and planned GLM treatment were recruited for a prospective, multicentre, observational study in Germany. Prediction of clinical response was assessed by FC and GLM trough level. Missing data were imputed as therapy failure according to the last observation carried forward method. RESULTS: Fifty nine patients have been enrolled. 54% of patients were anti-TNF naïve. Clinical response at week 6 was a significant predictor for achieving clinical response at week 26 (odds ratio [OR] 10.97, confidence interval [CI], 2.96-40.68; p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with a GLM trough level of ≥2.5 µg/mL and a ≥50% reduction of FC at week 6 had an OR of 5.33 (95% CI, 0.59-47.84) to achieve clinical response at week 26. CONCLUSION: Clinical response at week 6 is the best predictive marker for achieving clinical response at week 26. Consideration of significant reduction of FC and trough GLM serum levels could improve prediction of response.

Faecal calprotectin in COVID-19 patients with intestinal symptoms.

Introduction: Extra-pulmonary manifestations of the Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) have been increasingly reported, especially gastrointestinal and hepatic system dysfunction. The concern of faecal-oral transmission for COVID-19 was raised. Aim: To study the trend of faecal calprotectin in COVID-19 patients with intestinal symptoms. Material and methods: Forty confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection presenting with diarrhoea were subjected to a thorough history taking, clinical examination, and routine laboratory investigations. They were treated according to the Egyptian MOH guidelines. Faecal calprotectin (FC) concentration was measured at initial presentation and after 3 months. Those who had persistently elevated levels ≥ 200 µg/g were subjected to colonoscopic examination and histopathological examination. Forty confirmed cases of COVID-19 without diarrhoea were recruited as a control group in the initial FC evaluation. Results: Faecal calprotectin was found to be significantly elevated in the studied COVID-19 patients who presented with diarrhoea, with a mean value 260 ±80 µg/g compared to the those without diarrhoea, with a mean value of 31.6 ±12.9 µg/g (p < 0.001). Moreover, 20% (8 patients) had an elevated level exceeding 200 µg/g 3 months after recovery; among them, 5 patients showed mild colonoscopic changes whereas 3 patients showed severe ileocolitis. Out of the 3 patients with marked ileocolitis, 2 showed histopathological changes raising the diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Conclusions: Faecal calprotectin was found to be elevated in COVID-19 patients with intestinal symptoms, especially diarrhoea, with or without colonoscopic and histopathological changes.

Evaluation of the Role of Faecal Calprotectin in the Management of Psoriatic Patients under Treatment with Biologic Drugs.

Background: Fecal calprotectin has emerged as a significant, validated, and non-invasive biomarker allowing for the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Our study assessed the reliability of the use of faecal calprotectin as a valuable tool in the management of psoriatic patients on biological therapy. Methods: This was a single-centre prospective study including adult patients affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis starting biological therapy. Faecal calprotectin levels were evaluated at baseline and at week 24 (W24) of treatment in all enrolled patients. Results: Overall, 129 patients were enrolled. The mean baseline faecal calprotectin levels were 74.7 µg/g and a significant reduction was detected at W24 of biological therapy (57.5 µg/g). An analysis of faecal CP values stratified by therapy type was performed. No significant reduction was assessed at W24 for any of the anti-IL17 drugs, whereas a significant reduction was detected for all IL23 inhibitors. Conclusions: Our study showed the potential use of faecal CP levels as a valuable tool for exploring intestinal inflammation in the management of psoriatic patients undergoing treatment with biologic drugs.

New Faecal Calprotectin Assay by IDS: Validation and Comparison to DiaSorin Method.

Background: The faecal calprotectin (FC) measurement is used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnosis and follow-up. The aim of this study was to validate for the first time the new IDS FC extraction device and immunoassay kit, and to compare it with the DiaSorin test in patients with and without IBD. Methods: First, the precision of the IDS assay and its stability were assessed. Then, 379 stool extracts were analysed with the IDS kit on iSYS and compared with a DiaSorin Liaison XL assay. Results: The intra- and inter-assay CVs did not exceed 5%. The stool samples were stable up to 4 weeks at −20 °C. Lot-to-lot comparison showed a good correlation (Lot1 = 1.06 × Lot2 + 0.60; p > 0.05). The Passing and Bablok regression showed no significant deviation from linearity between the two methods (IDS = 1.06 × DiaSorin − 0.6; p > 0.05; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.93). According to the recommended cut-offs, the IDS assay identified more IBD and irritable bowel syndrome patients than DiaSorin, which had more borderline results (16 vs. 20%, respectively). Conclusions: The IDS faecal calprotectin had good analytical validation parameters. Compared to the DiaSorin method, it showed comparable results, but slightly outperformed it in the identification of more IBD patients and active disease.

Diagnostic performance of serum calprotectin in discriminating active from inactive ulcerative colitis in an outpatient setting.

There are limited and conflicting data on the value of serum calprotectin (sCp) in discriminating active from inactive disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). Faecal calprotectin (fCp), sCp, serum C-reactive protein (sCRP) and platelets were compared in patients with UC who had clinically active (n = 29) and clinically inactive (n = 42) disease. Serum calprotectin was measured with Bühlmann® (BMN sCp) and ImmunodiagnostikTM (IDK sCp) assays. Median (interquartile range) fCp was higher in active than inactive disease [1004 (466-1922) versus 151 (55-280) µg/g; p < 0.0001). BMN sCp [4534 (3387-6416) versus 4031 (2401-5414) ng/mL; p = 0.1825], IDK sCp [4531 (2920-6433) versus 3307 (2104-4789) ng/mL; p = 0.1065], sCRP [ 4 (2-8) versus 2 (1-4) mg/L; p = 0.0638) and platelets [269 (233-331) versus 280 (227-325) ×10-9/L; p = 0.8055] were similar in active and inactive disease respectively. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curves with 95% confidence limits were 0.85 (0.76-0.94) for fCp, 0.61 (0.47-0.74) for BMN sCp, 0.61 (0.48-0.75) for IDK sCp, 0.69 (0.56-0.81) for sCRP and 0.52 (0.38-0.66) for blood platelets. Faecal calprotectin is the optimum biomarker for discriminating between active and inactive UC. The diagnostic performance of sCp, irrespective of assay, and systemic biomarkers was poor; of these sCRP performed best.