Evaluation of tubal patency based on peak injection pressure in four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography among infertile females: a preliminary study.

Background: Although the application of four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (4D-HyCoSy) has relatively good diagnostic accuracy for assessing the patency of the fallopian tubes, the evaluation process mainly relies on morphological findings of the fallopian tubes and pelvic cavity. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship of peak injection pressure during 4D-HyCoSy and tubal patency to provide a quantitative indicator for the evaluation of fallopian tube patency. Methods: This study included infertile patients who underwent 4D-HyCoSy and laparoscopic chromopertubation (LC) between 2020 and 2022, with LC serving as the reference test for assessing tubal patency. For the HyCoSy procedure, the ultrasound contrast agent was injected automatically using a liquid injection machine, and real-time pressure values were recorded. Patients were classified based on tubal patency status in LC as bilaterally patent, unilaterally patent, or bilaterally nonpatent. The average peak injection pressure and contrast agent volume of different groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to determine the cutoff value. Results: A total of 268 infertile patients were enrolled in the study. With LC as the standard examination, the sensitivity and specificity of 4D-HyCoSy in diagnosing nonpatent fallopian tubes were 91.1% and 95.1%, respectively. In general, peak injection pressure was observed to gradually increase as tubal patency decreased (P<0.001), with average peak injection pressures of 233.5±66.3, 338.8±99.8, and 469.6±63.1 mmHg in the bilaterally patent, unilaterally patent, and bilaterally nonpatent groups, respectively. The volume of contrast agent used in patients in the bilaterally nonpatent group was significantly lower than that in the other two groups (P<0.01), with average volumes of 22.7±6.3, 24.3±9.3, and 18.9±9.2 mL, respectively. When one fallopian tube was patent, the area under the curve (AUC) for distinguishing obstruction from patency of the other fallopian tube was 0.827, with a sensitivity of 79.8% and a specificity of 74.3% (cutoff value: 254.3 mmHg). Similarly, when one fallopian tube was nonpatent, the AUC was 0.866, with a sensitivity of 90.6% and a specificity of 78.3% (cutoff value: 401.3 mmHg). Conclusions: Peak injection pressure during 4D-HyCoSy demonstrates promising diagnostic performance in evaluating fallopian tube patency in infertile patients.

Risk Factors of Contrast Agent Intravasation With Sulfur Hexafluoride Microbubble During Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the risk factors of sulfur hexafluoride microbubble contrast agent intravasation during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy), and to explore a simple prediction model by the obvious clinical history. METHODS: This was a retrospective study included 299 infertility women who had undergone HyCoSy examination from July 1, 2018 to June 31, 2019. The factors were recorded, including age, endometrial thickness, balloon length, infertility type, history of intrauterine surgery, history of pelvic surgery, and tubal patency. The method of multivariate logistic regression analysis was adopted to analyze the risk factors affecting the contrast agent intravasation, and the receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to test their efficacy. RESULTS: Secondary infertility, a history of intrauterine surgery, thin endometrial thickness, and tubal obstruction were all risk factors of the occurrence of intravasation (P < .05). And the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the multifactor-combined prediction model of the intravasation was significantly larger than that of single-factor. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographers and gynecologists should be familiar with the risk factors of intravasation and select the appropriate timing of HyCoSy toward reducing the occurrence of intravasation and other complications after thoroughly explaining and communicating with the patients.

Is Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography (HyCoSy) Using Sulfur Hexafluoride Microbubbles (SonoVue) Sufficient for the Assessment of Fallopian Tube Patency? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of HyCoSy using sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles for fallopian tubal patency assessment in infertile females. Twenty-four studies, including 1358 females with 2661 detected fallopian tubes published from January 2003 to May 2019, were identified. The pooled sensitivity was 93% (95% CI: 90-95%), while the specificity was 90% (95% CI: 87-92%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96 (95% CI: 94-98%). The specificity of the four-dimensional HyCoSy subgroup was higher than the 2D/3D subgroup; an increased dose of contrast agent did not affect the specificity, with only a slightly reduced sensitivity.

Operator's Influence on Contrast Agent Intravasation During Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography: Explanation Based on a Physics Model.

Objective: To analyze the risk factors of the operators on contrast agent intravasation during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy). Methods: We retrospectively collected 399 infertile women who underwent HyCoSy by the same sonographer. These patients were divided into two groups according to the way how the assistants connected the syringe to the uterus radiography catheter to inject the contrast agent. We analyzed whether the use of different contrast bolus injection methods had any influence on the incidence of intravasation during HyCoSy. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups with different cross-sectional areas of the syringe outflow tract in the risk variables for intravasation, but the intravasation rates of the two groups were different, 26.4% in group A and 17.1% in group B, P <0.05. The primary manifestation was that when both fallopian tubes were unobstructed, the intravasation rate of group B with smaller cross-sectional area of the outflow tract of the syringe was lower, and the difference was statistically significant. The inferences drawn from our physics model were also in line with the clinical results. Conclusion: The influence of different operators on the contrast agent intravasation rate of HyCoSy cannot be ignored. The assistants of HyCoSy examination should inject the contrast agent slowly and steady, and a needle can be used as a flow restrictor to control the flow into the uterine cavity per unit time, slow down the rising speed of intrauterine pressure, and avoid the accumulation of contrast agent in the uterine cavity, so as to reduce the intravasation caused by operator factors.

Improvement of fertility outcomes using dexamethasone / antibiotic adjuvant therapy following hysterosalpingography in infertile females: A randomised trial.

Objectives: To evaluate the benefit of modified hydrotubation with dexamethasone and antibiotics after hysterosalpingography in improving pregnancy rates in women with infertility issue. Methods: This retrospective study conducted at County Emergency Clinical Hospital Oradea, Bihor, Romania, between January 2017 and December 2019. One hundred twenty infertile females were investigated, as part of their evaluation, Hysterosalpingography was performed. After the investigation 97 patients had taken utero-tubal instillations with (Ceftriaxone 1 gr. [Cefort] and 4 mg of Dexamethasone, Lidocaine 1% 10 ml, and a Sodium chloride 0.9% 10 ml), and 23 patients were included in the control group which didn't receive utero-tubal instillations. Number of obtained pregnancies by natural way over the next year was compared in the two groups. Results: From all participants in this study, 30 women became pregnant during the study. In addition, 29 out of 30 pregnant women had taken hydrotubation procedure. The significant statistical difference was observed between the groups p=0.011 (p<0.05), and the odd ratio was less than one (OR=9.3, 95%, CI: 1,207 to 72.926). We also found an indirect correlation between abortion in the past and the pregnancy ratio (r=-0.21). Conclusion: The results of the study demonstrated that the application of modified hydrotubation with the administration of dexamethasone and antibiotics in patients who had at least one patent fallopian tubes, can increase the chance of fertility.

Cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis following hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy).

We present a case of diffuse skin immune reaction, diagnosed as cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis, following assessment of tubal patency by contrast ultrasound, which appears to be the first reported case of hypersensitivity reaction to sonographic tubal patency testing, based on a literature search. A 32-year-old woman presented with non-thrombocytopenic palpable purpura the day after assessment of tubal patency by two-/three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) using ExEm® Foam. During real-time ultrasound, the observer identified flow in only the right tube when using saline with air as contrast medium; however, the same observer identified flow in both tubes after injecting ExEm Foam and the woman left the clinic without any complications. The next day, the patient was admitted with a complaint of a red-purple skin rash noticed the same morning, associated with moderate leg pain. Slow-motion analysis of the recorded videos and three-dimensional ultrasound datasets showed previously unnoticed venous intravasation of ExEm Foam into the myometrial vessels. Palpable purpura is typically found in vasculitis as a result of extravasation of red cells outside the inflamed blood vessel. This previously unreported side effect of tubal patency testing by HyFoSy, its potential rare organ consequences, as well as unknown consequences of venous intravasation by foam, should be included in the informed consent prior to the examination. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Effectiveness on fertility outcome of tubal flushing with different contrast media: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare, in women with infertility, the effectiveness and safety of tubal flushing using oil-based contrast medium, water-based contrast medium or their combination, and no tubal flushing, and to evaluate the effectiveness of tubal flushing on fertility outcome over time. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis, searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and trial registries, up to 25 September 2018. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the following interventions with each other or with no intervention in women with infertility: tubal flushing using water-based contrast medium, tubal flushing using oil-based contrast medium or additional tubal flushing with oil-based medium following diagnostic tubal flushing with water-based medium. The outcomes included clinical pregnancy, live birth, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 283 studies identified through the search, 14 RCTs reporting on 3852 women with infertility were included. Network meta-analysis showed that tubal flushing using oil-based contrast medium was associated with higher odds of clinical pregnancy within 6 months after randomization and more subsequent live births compared with tubal flushing using water-based medium (odds ratio (OR), 1.67 (95% CI, 1.38-2.03), moderate certainty of evidence; and OR, 2.18 (95% CI, 1.30-3.65), low certainty of evidence, respectively) and compared with no intervention (OR, 2.28 (95% CI, 1.50-3.47), moderate certainty of evidence; and OR, 2.85 (95% CI, 1.41-5.74), low certainty of evidence, respectively). These results agreed with those of the pairwise meta-analysis. For clinical pregnancy within 6 months, there was insufficient evidence of a difference between tubal flushing with water-based contrast medium and no intervention (OR, 1.36 (95% CI, 0.91-2.04), low certainty of evidence). For fertility outcomes after 6 months, there was insufficient evidence of a difference in any comparison (low to very low certainty of evidence). Compared with tubal flushing using water-based contrast medium, the use of oil-based contrast medium was associated with higher odds of asymptomatic intravasation (OR, 5.06 (95% CI, 2.29-11.18), moderate certainty of evidence). CONCLUSIONS: In women with infertility undergoing fertility workup, tubal flushing using oil-based contrast medium probably increases clinical pregnancy rates within 6 months after randomization and may increase subsequent live-birth rates, compared with tubal flushing using water-based contrast medium and compared with no intervention. Evidence on fertility outcomes beyond 6 months is inadequate to draw firm conclusions. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Eficacia sobre el resultado de fertilidad del lavado de trompas con diferentes medios de contraste: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis en red OBJETIVOS: Comparar, en mujeres con infertilidad, la efectividad y seguridad del lavado de trompas con un medio de contraste a base de aceite, un medio de contraste a base de agua o una combinación, y el no lavado de trompas, y evaluar la efectividad del lavado de trompas en el resultado de la fertilidad con el tiempo. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión sistemática y un metaanálisis en red, mediante búsquedas en las bases de datos electrónicas MEDLINE, EMBASE y el Registro Central Cochrane de Ensayos Controlados, y en otros registros de ensayos, hasta el 25 de septiembre de 2018. Se incluyeron ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA) que compararon las siguientes intervenciones entre sí o con la no intervención en mujeres con infertilidad: lavado de trompas con medio de contraste a base de agua, lavado de trompas con medio de contraste a base de aceite o lavado de trompas adicional con un medio a base de aceite después de un lavado de trompas con un medio a base de agua. Los resultados incluyeron el embarazo confirmado ecográficamente, el nacimiento vivo, el embarazo en curso, el aborto espontáneo, el embarazo ectópico y los eventos adversos. RESULTADOS: De los 283 estudios identificados mediante la búsqueda, se incluyeron 14 ECA que informaron sobre 3852 mujeres con infertilidad. El metaanálisis en red mostró que el lavado de trompas con medio de contraste a base de aceite se asoció con mayores probabilidades de embarazo confirmado ecográficamente dentro de los seis meses posteriores a la aleatorización y más nacimientos vivos posteriores en comparación con el lavado de trompas con medio a base de agua (razón de momios [RM], 1,67; IC 95%: 1,38-2,03), certeza moderada de evidencia; y RM, 2,18 (IC 95%: 1,30-3,65), certeza baja de evidencia, respectivamente) y en comparación con la no intervención (RM, 2,28 (IC 95%: 1,50-3,47), certeza moderada de evidencia; y RM, 2,85 (IC 95%: 1,41-5,74), certeza baja de evidencia, respectivamente). Estos resultados coincidieron con los del metaanálisis por pares. No hubo evidencia suficiente de una diferencia entre el lavado de trompas con medio de contraste a base de agua y la no intervención para el embarazo clínico dentro de los seis meses (RM, 1,36 (IC 95%: 0,91-2,04); certeza baja de evidencia). Para los resultados de fertilidad después de los seis meses, no hubo evidencia suficiente de diferencias en cualquier comparación (certeza de evidencia baja a muy baja). En comparación con el lavado de trompas con un medio de contraste a base de agua, el uso de un medio de contraste a base de aceite se asoció con mayores probabilidades de intravasación asintomática (RM, 5,06 (IC 95%: 2,29-11,18), certeza moderada de evidencia). CONCLUSIONES: En las mujeres con infertilidad que se someten a un examen de fertilidad, el lavado de trompas con medio de contraste a base de aceite aumenta la probabilidad de las tasas de embarazo clínico dentro de los 6 meses posteriores a la aleatorización y puede aumentar las tasas posteriores de nacimientos vivos, en comparación con el lavado de trompas con medio de contraste a base de agua y en comparación con la no intervención. La evidencia sobre los resultados de fertilidad después de los seis meses es inadecuada para establecer conclusiones firmes. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Intravasation Affects the Diagnostic Image Quality of Transvaginal 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With SonoVue.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to retrospectively analyze the diagnostic image quality of transvaginal 4-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography from infertile patients and determine the significant influencing factors. METHODS: A total of 445 patients visiting infertility clinics were included in the study, of which 167 were primary infertile and 278 were secondary infertile. The factors were recorded, including age; examination time; infertility type; history of pelvic inflammatory disease, pelvic surgery, intrauterine surgery, and ectopic pregnancy; endometrial thickness; uterine position; ovarian position; 2-dimensional image quality; intravasation quantity, position, and time; balloon volume; and the dosage of contrast agent or the sterile saline solution. All the factors were compared among different diagnostic image quality groups. The method of rank logistic regression analysis was adopted to analyze the risk factors affecting the diagnostic image quality. RESULTS: Among the 445 infertile patients, 124 (27.9%) patients had intravasation occur during transvaginal 4-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography. The diagnostic image quality between the 2 sonographers was consistent (Cronbach's alpha, 0.993). Different intravasation quantities, positions, and times; increased of balloon volume; and history of pelvic surgery were substantial risk factors for the diagnostic image quality. The diagnostic image quality diminished with the increase of intravasation. In the patient with cornual intravasation, the diagnostic image quality was substantially worse than that with non-cornual intravasation. Moreover, early onset of intravasation seriously affected the diagnostic image quality. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, intravasation affected the diagnostic image quality, especially early cornual massive intravasation.

Higher Prevalence of Endometrial Polyps in Patients with Fallopian Tube Obstruction: A Case-control Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the association between endometrial polyps and fallopian tube patency diagnosed by hysteroscopy, conventional histology, and 4-dimensional (4D) hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy). DESIGN: A case-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 323 women of reproductive age underwent 4D HyCoSy and hysteroscopy between January 2015 and December 2017. INTERVENTION: A retrospective analysis of the association of endometrial polyps and fallopian tube obstruction (n = 154) or patency (n = 169) in patients who underwent 4D HyCoSy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of endometrial polyps was significantly higher in patients with bilateral fallopian tube obstruction than in patients with bilateral fallopian tube patency (42.9% [66/154] vs 20.1% [34/169], p <.0001). In univariate and multivariate analyses, the presence of endometrial polyps was found to be a risk factor for tubal obstruction with an odds ratio of 3.16 and 2.59, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of endometrial polyps is higher in infertile patients with fallopian tube obstruction than in patients with fallopian tube patency. History of endometrial polyps, ectopic pregnancy, and pelvic inflammatory disease are risk factors for tubal obstruction.

Pain Intensity During Ultrasound Assessment of Uterine Cavity and Tubal Patency With and Without Painkillers: Prospective Observational Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the pain intensity and incidence of mild to severe pain during the ultrasound assessment of the uterine cavity and tubal patency using saline, air and saline, and foam as contrasts with and without painkiller. DESIGN: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). SETTING: Private clinic. PATIENTS: Three hundred infertile women who were consecutively submitted to uterine cavity and tubal patency assessment by ultrasound using saline, air, and foam in single exam between October 2012 and November 2013. INTERVENTIONS: No painkillers were used until March 2013 when we started offering an effervescent codeine tablet containing paracetamol 500 mg and codeine phosphate 30 mg approximately 1 hour before the procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pain intensity measured with an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale and incidence of moderate/severe levels of pain (numerical rating scale > 3) during the main components of the procedure (speculum insertion, catheter insertion, saline infusion, air and saline infusion, foam infusion, and after the procedure [0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours]) were assessed. The incidence of moderatesevere pain was significantly lower in women using painkillers considering any moment of the procedure: 49 of 175 (28%) versus 65 of 125 (52%); relative risk, .54; 95% confidence interval, .40-.72; p < .001; number needed to treat, 4. Less women presented with moderate/severe pain during air and saline compared with foam infusion: 31 of 300 (10%) versus 75 of 300 (25%); p < .001; relative risk, .41, 95% confidence interval, .28-.61. CONCLUSION: The incidence of moderate/severe pain during the ultrasound assessment of the uterine cavity and tubal patency is common. Our results suggest that using paracetamol + codeine before the procedure reduces the pain level, but randomized controlled trials are required.

Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.

Study question: What is the diagnostic accuracy of 2D/3D hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and 2D/3D-high-definition flow Doppler (HDF)-HyFoSy in comparison to laparoscopy with dye chromotubation (as the reference method) and 2D air/saline-enhanced hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) (as the initial index test)? Summary answer: 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy had the best diagnostic accuracy and was the only method that did not significantly differ from the reference method, while both 2D/3D-HyFoSy and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy had significantly higher accuracy than 2D-air/saline-HyCoSy. What is known already: Previous studies on X-ray hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy and dye as the reference standard have undermined the impact of older commercial contrast agents on the accuracy of ultrasound tubal patency tests. Recently, HyFoSy was reported to have very high accuracy in a small pilot study in comparison to laparoscopy and dye, and had a very high positive predictive value (PPV) for medical tubal occlusion. A new Doppler sonographic technique, known as HDF imaging with better axial resolution, fewer blooming artifacts and higher sensitivity than color and power Doppler imaging, has been introduced. Study design, size, duration: A prospective observational study was performed on 132 women (259 Fallopian tubes) consecutively enrolled between 2013 and 2015. Participants/materials, setting, methods: This study included infertile women of reproductive age who previously had not been examined for tubal patency and who presented for the evaluation to the university hospital, private hospital and clinic at which this study was conducted. 2D-Air/saline-HyCoSy, 2D/3D-HyFoSy and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy and laparoscopy were performed independently by experienced readers. During HyFoSy, the 3D mode was used for standardization of pelvic scanning and observations of contrast flow without diagnosis after volume acquisition. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value (NPV and PPV), negative and positive-likelihood ratio (LR- and LR+) and 95% CI were calculated. McNemar's test and relative predictive values (a comparison of NPV and PPV) were used to compare all the index tests. Main results and the role of chance: 2D-Air/saline-HyCoSy, 2D/3D-HyFoSy and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy indicated that 46 (17.8%), 27 (10.4%) and 24 (9.2%) of the 259 tubes were occluded, respectively; additionally, inconclusive results were obtained for 8 (3%), 5 (1.9%) and 3 (1.2%) tubes, respectively. The reference method revealed 18 (6.9%) occluded Fallopian tubes. 2D-Air/saline-HyCoSy had a high NPV (99.5%) that was similar to that of 2D/3D-HyFoSy (99%) and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy (99.6%) (P > 0.05), but had a very low PPV (30.4%). The use of 2D/3D-HyFoSy, especially 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy, which had a significantly higher PPV (48% and 71%, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; respectively), resulted in fewer false positive and inconclusive findings than the use of 2D-air/saline-HyCoSy. The LR- and LR+ was 0.14 and 14.8, respectively, for 2D/3D-HyFoSy, 0.06 and 32.1, respectively, for 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy, and 0.08 and 6.9, respectively, for 2D-air/saline-HyCoSy. The number of inconclusive or positive results per patient was significantly fewer with 2D/3D-HyFoSy (odds ratio, OR = 0.5, CI = 0.3-0.95, P < 0.05) and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8, P < 0.01) than with 2D-air/saline-HyCoSy. Limitations, reasons for caution: An unselected infertile population with a low prevalence of tubal occlusion is suitable for estimating the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests only as a screening tool. Wider implications of the findings: These findings can be used to establish a diagnostic strategy with high accuracy but minimum invasiveness and limited use of contrast agents and sophisticated technology. 2D-Air/saline-HyCoSy, which has a high NPV, is suitable as an initial test and basic screening method, but 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy, which has a significantly higher PPV, can be used as a standard to verify any questionable or positive results obtained with 2D HyCoSy. This strategy may signficantly reduce the need for laparoscopy as a reference standard. Study funding/competing interest(s): There was no external funding for this study, and the authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Trial registration number: N/A.

Correlation between the wide range of tubal pathology discovered by routine hysterosalpingography in a university hospital in Romania and the successful pregnancy rate. A cohort study.

RATIONALE: Hysterosalpingography is still the main method to begin with when studying the causes of female impossibility to conceive a baby. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to correlate and evaluate the wide range of tubal pathology discovered by routine hysterosalpingography in a university hospital in Romania with the successful pregnancy rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 95 consecutive patients explored by routine hysterosalpingography in a university hospital during 2015 and 2016 were included. Out of 173 fallopian tubes studied, 28.9% were occluded, 13.29% were almost occluded, and only 57.8% were patent. Of these patients, 11 successful pregnancies occurred in 95 women (11.57%) until September 2017. A number of 7 patients delivered a normal baby in our hospital (7.36%). One patient was admitted at 36 weeks of gestation, and another one at 26 weeks of gestation, for risk of premature delivery. None of these two patients delivered in our hospital. Two patients were admitted for miscarriage at 8 weeks and 5 weeks of pregnancy. In all the 7 patients who delivered a normal baby, the fallopian tubes were entirely visible (100%), whether they were patent or not. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest study about hysterosalpingography and the successful pregnancy rate in Romania so far. ABBREVIATIONS: ART= Assisted reproductive technologies.

Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With Four-Dimensional Technique for Screening Fallopian Tubal Patency: Let's Make an Exploration.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the practicability of transvaginal 4-dimensional (4D) hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) using SonoVue for screening of fallopian tube patency in infertile females. DESIGN: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. PATIENTS: 204 infertile females who underwent 4D-HyCoSy between July 2015 and June 2016. INTERVENTION: 4D-HyCoSy was performed to acquire dynamic images. If any of the fallopian tubes was not developing during the process, the procedure was repeated promptly, to exclude false-positive outcomes. Subsequently, tube status was confirmed by traditional 2-dimensional (2D)-HyCoSy. Finally, the results of the 4D-HyCoSy and the final 2D-HyCoSy were compared. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 204 patients (408 tubes) were evaluated ith 4D-HyCoSy followed by 2D-HyCoSy. Of these 408 tubes, 385 demonstrated the same status on 4D-HyCoSy and 2D-HyCoSy, for an agreement rate of 94.4%. CONCLUSION: A 4D technique combined with HyCoSy is a practicable screening method for assessing fallopian tube patency. It overcomes the disadvantages of 2D-HyCoSy and has a relatively high degree of agreement with the more difficult 2D-HyCoSy technique.

Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency in endometriosis patients.

OBJECTIVE: Tubal patency in women with endometriosis has traditionally been evaluated by laparoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency in these women. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted at Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit. Infertile women who underwent HyCoSy and then a laparoscopy (dye test) within 6 months from the HyCoSy were included. Tubal patency was assessed by HyCoSy and the findings were compared with the results of laparoscopy, which was considered the gold standard for assessment of tubal patency. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and positive and negative likelihood ratios (Lh+, Lh-) were calculated including the 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 1452 women underwent HyCoSy and 126 of them received a laparoscopy within 6 months from the HyCoSy. Of the 126 women, 42 (33.3%) had a diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis and 84 (66.7%) had no endometriosis. In the endometriosis population, HyCoSy showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, Lh+ and Lh- of 85% (95% CI 62-96), 93% (95% CI 82-97), 81% (95% CI 58-94), 94% (95% CI 84-98), 12.6 (95% CI 4.8-33) and 0.15 (95% CI 0.05-0.4) respectively. In the non-endometriosis group, HyCoSy showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+ and LR- of 85% (95% CI 65-95), 93% (95% CI 87-96), 71% (95% CI 53-85), 97% (95% CI 92-99), 13.2 (95% CI 6.9-25) and 0.15 (95% CI 0.06-0.3) respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of HyCoSy was 91% in the endometriosis group and 92% in the non-endometriosis patients. CONCLUSIONS: HyCoSy showed high accuracy in evaluating tubal patency in infertile non-endometriosis women and in those affected by endometriosis.

Pain during Fallopian-tube patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate perception of pain during Fallopian-tube patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 216 consecutive women presenting at a university fertility clinic for HyFoSy examination were included. Patients were instructed to take ibuprofen 1 hour before the procedure. Immediately after the procedure, patients filled in a questionnaire concerning discomfort or pain experienced during the process, including a visual analog scale (VAS) score for perception of pain. RESULTS: The median VAS score for perception of pain during transvaginal ultrasound examination and during HyFoSy examination was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) and 3.6 (95% CI, 3.0-4.0), respectively. One-third of women reported that the level of discomfort or pain during HyFoSy examination was similar to that during the preceding transvaginal ultrasound examination and 48% of women considered HyFoSy examination to be neutral/unpleasant, but not painful. There was an inverse association between both patients' age and parity and the pain experienced. CONCLUSIONS: HyFoSy examination is tolerated well and allows for reliable tubal patency testing without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation in an outpatient setting with a low technical failure rate.

B-flow ultrasound facilitates visualization of contrast medium during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if B-flow ultrasound improves visualization of flow of contrast medium in the Fallopian tubes during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) compared with grayscale ultrasound. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 160 women referred for HyCoSy as part of infertility work-up between January 2011 and September 2012. In each woman, at the same session, HyCoSy was performed first using saline with air and then using Sonovue®, and for each contrast medium, grayscale ultrasound was first used and then B-flow ultrasound was used. Flow of contrast was observed in three parts of each tube: intramural, middle and distal. RESULTS: In 129 (81%) women, flow of Sonovue was observed in the intramural part of both tubes and in the pouch of Douglas when using grayscale ultrasound. In these women, flow of Sonovue was seen in the middle part of 70% of the 258 tubes when using grayscale ultrasound and in 93% when using B-flow ultrasound; and in the distal part in 81% when using grayscale ultrasound and in 98% when using B-flow ultrasound. When using air and saline, flow was seen in the intramural part of 90% and 93% of the tubes, in the middle part in 54% and 72%, and in the distal part in 66% and 90%, using grayscale ultrasound and B-flow ultrasound, respectively. CONCLUSION: B-flow ultrasound facilitates detection of flow of contrast in the middle and distal parts of the tubes at HyCoSy, especially when a mixture of saline and air is used as contrast medium.

Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy for tubal patency in infertile women.

BACKGROUND: Tubal occlusion is one of the most frequent causes of infertility in women. The evaluation of the fallopian tube is necessary to determine the management plan for infertility. The two most important diagnostic procedures which are used for the evaluation of tubal patency are hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare HSG and laparoscopic findings in the diagnosis of tubal patency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study sixty two infertile cases were examined by HSG as part of their routine infertility evaluation, three months after HSG, tubs status were assessed by laparoscopy as a gold standard method. The findings of HSG and laparoscopy were compared. The Laparoscopy findings were used as reference standard to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for unilateral and bilateral no tubal patency. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of HSG on bilateral tubal patency or no bilateral tubal patency were 92.1% and 85.7% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 97.2% and 66.7%, and the accuracy was 91.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of HSG for evaluation of the bilateral tubal patency and unilateral or bilateral no tubal patency were 77.8% and 52.94%, the positive and negative predictive values were 81.4% and 47.4% respectively, and the accuracy was 71%. CONCLUSION: HSG is considered to have a high sensitivity and specificity. HSG and laparoscopy are not alternative, but are the complementary methods in the examination of no tubal patency.

Laparoscopia na decisão da estratégia terapêutica para o casal infértil / Laparoscopy in the decision of treatment strategy for the infertile couple

OBJETIVO: avaliar a contribuição da laparoscopia diagnóstica na abordagem do casal infértil. MÉTODOS: estudo retrospectivo com análise dos 86 casos consecutivos de pacientes acompanhadas em consulta de esterilidade que foram submetidas à laparoscopia entre Janeiro de 2004 e Dezembro de 2006. Oitenta e duas pacientes tinham realizado histerossalpingografia (HSG) previamente à laparoscopia. Avaliaram-se os achados laparoscópicos bem como os procedimentos acessórios efetuados, e correlacionaram-se os achados histerossalpingográficos com os da laparoscopia. A análise estatística foi efetuada com o Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 15. A sensibilidade e a especificidade da HSG foram determinadas e os intervalos de confiança calculados assumindo-se um erro alfa de 0,05 (IC95 por cento). RESULTADOS: na laparoscopia foram identificadas alterações compatíveis com endometriose em 21 casos (24,4 por cento), salpinge uni/bilateral em 14 casos (16,3 por cento) e doença inflamatória pélvica em 16 casos (18,6 por cento). Procedeu-se à adesiólise e à fulguração dos focos de endometriose em oito pacientes. Foram feitas duas salpingostomias, duas quistectomias do paraovário, duas quistectomias do ovário e três drillings do ovário. A prova de permeabilidade tubar foi normal em 44 casos (53 por cento), revelou obstrução unilateral em 21 (25,3 por cento) e obstrução bilateral em 17 (20,5 por cento). Os resultados da histerossalpingografia foram concordantes com os da laparoscopia em 44 dos 82 casos (53,7 por cento). Quando definimos doença como qualquer forma de obstrução tubar presente na laparoscopia, a sensibilidade da HSG foi 0,79 (IC95 por cento=0,62-0,9) e a especificidade 0,58 (IC95 por cento=0,42-0,73). Quando limitamos a definição de doença à presença de obstrução tubar bilateral na laparoscopia, a sensibilidade e a especificidade da HSG foram 0,47 (IC95 por cento=0,24-0,71) e 0,77 (IC95 por cento=0,64-0,86), respectivamente. Em nove casos (15,3 por cento) em que a HSG havia sido normal ou revelado apenas obstrução unilateral, a laparoscopia revelou obstrução bilateral. Em 15 casos (65,2 por cento) em que a HSG havia demonstrado obstrução bilateral, a laparoscopia foi normal ou revelou apenas obstrução unilateral. CONCLUSÕES: a laparoscopia demonstrou sua relevância diagnóstica e terapêutica revelando-se fundamental na clarificação do status tubo-peritoneal. Permitiu a realização concomitante de atos terapêuticos, possibilitando a definição da melhor estratégia terapêutica no casal infértil.

PURPOSE: to evaluate the contribution of diagnostic laparoscopy to approach the infertile couple. METHODS: retrospective analysis of 86 consecutive cases of patients who were accompanied in the infertility appointments and were submitted to diagnostic laparoscopy from January 2004 to December 2006. Eighty-two of these patients had been submitted to hysterosalpingography (HSG) prior to laparoscopy. The laparoscopic findings were analyzed, as well as the accessory procedures, and the results of the hysterosalpingography and of the laparoscopy were correlated. Statistical analysis was performed by the use of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 15. The sensitivity and the specificity of HSG were determined and the confidence intervals were calculated with an alpha error of 0.05 (95 percentCI). RESULTS: the laparoscopy revealed 21 cases of endometriosis (24.4 percent), 14 cases of uni/bilateral inflammatory disease of the salpinx (16.3 percent), and 16 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (18.6 percent). Adhesiolysis and ablation of endometrial lesions were performed in eight patients. There were also other accessory procedures: two salpingostomies, two paraovarian cystectomies, two ovarian cystectomies and three ovarian drillings. The tubal patency test during laparoscopy was normal in 44 cases (53 percent), revealed unilateral obstruction in 21 cases (25.3 percent) and bilateral obstruction in 17 cases (20.5 percent). The results of the hysterosalpingography were similar to those of the laparoscopy in 44 out of the 82 cases (53.7 percent). HSG sensitivity was 0.79 (95 percentCI=0.62-0.9) and its specificity was 0.58 (95 percentCI=0.42-0.73) when the disease was defined as any form of tubal occlusion detected with the laparoscopy, wheter this occlusion was one-sided or two-sided. HSG sensitivity and specificity were 0.47 (95 percentCI=0.24-0.71) and 0.77 (95 percentCI=0.64-0.86), respectively, when the definition of the disease was limited to two-sided tubal occlusion. In nine cases (15.3 percent) in which HSG had shown normal findings or only a unilateral occlusion, laparoscopy revealed a two-sided occlusion. And in 15 cases (65.2 percent) in which HSG had shown a two-sided occlusion, laparoscopy revealed normal findings or one-sided occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: the laparoscopy demonstrated its diagnostic and therapeutic relevance, proving to have fundamental importance for the clarification of the tuboperitoneal status. It has permitted the development of concomitant accessory therapeutic procedures, thus defining the best treatment strategy for the infertile couples.