Improved detection of donor-specific HLA-class II antibody in kidney transplant recipients by modified immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis.

Immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) which basic principle is same as Luminex crossmatch (LXM), could detect donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA). The advantages of ICFA are (i) detection of DSA and (ii) no requirement of viable cells over the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM). However, FCXM has been widely used because of its higher sensitivity than ICFA, in particular HLA-class II antibody detection. In this study the accuracy of DSA detection against HLA-class II was investigated by modifying the original method of ICFA. Increment of the sensitivity was found when purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used instead of whole blood. An ICFA-PBMC in addition to FCXM-T/B was conducted for 118 patients before kidney transplantation and 13 patients with de novo DSA against HLA-class II after transplantation. Significantly positive correlation was observed between the values of ICFA-PBMC and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) targeting class II (p < 0.0001). When the cutoff level of 1.4 was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the average DSA MFI was found to be significantly higher in the ICFA-PBMC (class II) positive group comparing to that in the negative group (12,217 vs 3885, p = 0.0027). ICFA-PBMC and optimized cutoff level could provide valid information in cases of suspected DSA.

Effect of ABO incompatibility on T-cell flow cytometry cross-match results prior to living donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Due to its high sensitivity, the flow cytometry cross-match (FCXM) has been described as valuable tool for identifying an optimal donor. We here focused on the impact of ABO incompatibility on FCXM results. METHODS: We analyzed 29 ABO incompatible and 89 ABO compatible donor-recipient pairs (73 and 175 datasets, respectively) prior to living donor kidney transplantation. In all patients, lymphocytotoxic cross-matches for B and T cells were negative. RESULTS: Recipients with blood group O (A to O and B to O) displayed significantly (P < 0.05) higher T-FCXM results than those with blood group A and B (A to B, B to A and AB to A), respectively. Donor-specific T-FCXM responses (ΔMFI values) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in ABO incompatible vs. compatible pairs (ABO incompatible recipients with blood group O: 32 ± 6; with blood group A: 19 ± 7; with blood group B: 7 ± 4; recipients with ABO compatibility: 3 ± 2, respectively, data represent mean ± SEM). Consistent with the T-FCXM results donor-specific isohemagglutinins (IgG titers) were significantly higher in recipients with blood group O vs. A, both prior to rituximab treatment and plasmapheresis/immune adsorption (P = 0.004) and immediately prior to transplantation, i.e., after rituximab and antibody-depleting therapies (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: ABO incompatibility was associated with higher T-FCXM responses, especially in recipients with blood group O. This finding has major impact on the interpretation of flow cross-match results. Current cut-off values need to be reassessed in the ABO incompatible setting. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Rapid optimized flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) assays: The Halifax and Halifaster protocols.

The flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) assay, which detects the presence of donor specific HLA antibodies in patient sera, is a cornerstone of HLA compatibility testing. Since relatively long FCXM assay turnaround times may contribute to transplant delays and increased graft ischemia time, we developed and validated two modified crossmatch procedures, namely the Halifax and Halifaster FCXM protocols. These protocols reduce FCXM assay time >60% and simplify their set-up without compromising quality or sensitivity. Optimization of the FCXM (the Halifax protocol) includes a 96-well tray platform, reduced wash times, increased serum to cell suspension volume ratio, shortened incubations and higher incubation temperature. The Halifaster protocol is a further modification, employing methods that improve lymphocyte purity compared to density gradient centrifugation (96 ±â€¯2.63% vs 69 ±â€¯19.06%), reduce cell isolation time (by ∼40%) and conserve FCXM assay reagents. Importantly, linear regression analysis of the median channel fluorescence shift (MCFS) values revealed excellent concordance (R2 of 0.98-0.99) among all three FCXM protocols (standard vs Halifax vs Halifaster). Finally, a retrospective review of 2013 crossmatches performed using the Halifax protocol demonstrated excellent correlation with the virtual crossmatch (95.7% and 96.8% specificity and sensitivity, respectively) regarding the identification of donor specific antibodies (HLA-A/B/DR) assigned based on the single antigen bead (SAB) assay testing with a 2000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cutoff. Implementation of the Halifax or Halifaster protocols will expedite pre-transplantation work-up and improve patient care.

Poor kidney allograft survival associated with positive B cell - Only flow cytometry cross matches: a ten year single center study.

The presence of donor specific antibody (DSA) to class 1 or class 2 HLA as detected respectively in T cell or B cell - only flow cytometry cross matches (FCXMs) are risk factors for renal allograft survival, though the comparative risk of these XMs has not been definitively established. Allograft survival and FCXM data in 624 microcytotoxicity (CDC) XM negative kidney transplants were evaluated. Short and long term allograft survival was significantly less in recipients with T(-) B(+) FCXMs (1 year, 74%, 10 year, 58%) compared to T(+) B(+) FCXMs (1 year, 84%, 10 year, 68%) and to T(-) B(-) FCXM (1 year, 90%, 10 year, 85%). Risk factors were positive FCXM, deceased donor (DD) transplantation and donor age, but not race, gender, recipient age or previous transplant. Recipients with T(-) B(+) and T(+) B(+) FCXMs were at 4.5 and 2.5 fold greater risk, respectively, of DD allograft failure compared to patients with T(-) B(-) FCXMs. The quantitative value of FCXM did not correlate with the duration of graft survival. We conclude that patients with DSA to class 2 HLA have a greater risk of early and late allograft failure compared to patients with DSA to class 1 HLA.