Inflammatory proteins associated with Alzheimer's disease reduced by a GLP1 receptor agonist: a post hoc analysis of the EXSCEL randomized placebo controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are a viable option for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD) but the mechanisms of this potential disease modifying action are unclear. We investigated the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) on AD associated proteomic clusters. METHODS: The Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering study compared the cardiovascular effects of EQW 2 mg with placebo in 13,752 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 4,979 proteins were measured (Somascan V0.4) on baseline and 1-year plasma samples of 3,973 participants. C-reactive protein (CRP), ficolin-2 (FCN2), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (sVCAM1) and 4 protein clusters were tested in multivariable mixed models. RESULTS: EQW affected FCN2 (Cohen's d -0.019), PAI-1 (Cohen's d -0.033), sVCAM-1 (Cohen's d 0.035) and a cytokine-cytokine cluster (Cohen's d 0.037) significantly compared with placebo. These effects were sustained in individuals over the age of 65 but not in those under 65. CONCLUSIONS: EQW treatment was associated with significant change in inflammatory proteins associated with AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EXSCEL is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01144338 on 10th of June 2010.

Exploring the clinical effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in managing cardiovascular complications: an updated comprehensive review and future directives.

The possible cardiovascular advantages of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), a class of drugs predominantly used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D), have garnered increasing attention in recent years. Clinical trials have looked into the possibility that GLP-1RAs have extra cardioprotective benefits in addition to their ability to manage T2D, demonstrating significant major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reduction and a favorable safety profile. GLP-1 RAs improve cardiovascular outcomes, especially in those with existing cardiovascular disease. MACE has been steadily declining with this class of drugs, which results in a noticeable rise in cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs). GLP-1 RAs have a variety of impacts on the cardiovascular system beyond their function in glycemic control. They offer direct cardioprotection, vasodilation, promotion of salt excretion, reduction of weight, improved lipid profile, and anti-inflammatory qualities through a variety of mechanisms. Thus, this review focuses on GLP-1RAs, its mechanism of action, its clinical effectiveness in CVOTs, the mechanism behind its cardiovascular benefits, its potential role in heart failure, cardiovascular outcomes, its underutilization, and future directives. In conclusion, GLP-1 RAs shows potential in controlling T2D while also lowering cardiovascular risk, but warrants further study into long-term results and real-world data to optimize treatment regimens, ultimately increasing patient outcomes and lowering the burden of cardiovascular disease in T2D populations.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: Exploring the mechanisms from glycemic control to treatment of multisystemic diseases.

This editorial takes a deeper look at the insights provided by Soresi and Giannitrapani, which examined the therapeutic potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. We provide supplementary insights to their research, highlighting the broader systemic implications of GLP-1RAs, synthesizing the current understanding of their mechanisms and the trajectory of research in this field. GLP-1RAs are revolutionizing the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and beyond. Beyond glycemic control, GLP-1RAs demonstrate cardiovascular and renal protective effects, offering potential in managing diabetic kidney disease al-ongside renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. Their role in bone metabolism hints at benefits for diabetic osteoporosis, while the neuroprotective properties of GLP-1RAs show promise in Alzheimer's disease treatment by modulating neuronal insulin signaling. Additionally, they improve hormonal and metabolic profiles in polycystic ovary syndrome. This editorial highlights the multifaceted mechanisms of GLP-1RAs, emphasizing the need for ongoing research to fully realize their therapeutic potential across a range of multisystemic diseases.

Beyond weight loss: the potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for treating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome with various phenotypes, and obesity is one of the most common and clinically relevant phenotypes of HFpEF. Obesity contributes to HFpEF through multiple mechanisms, including sodium retention, neurohormonal dysregulation, altered energy substrate metabolism, expansion of visceral adipose tissue, and low-grade systemic inflammation. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a hormone in the incretin family. It is produced by specialized cells called neuroendocrine L cells located in the distal ileum and colon. GLP-1 reduces blood glucose levels by promoting glucose-dependent insulin secretion from pancreatic ß cells, suppressing glucagon release from pancreatic α cells, and blocking hepatic gluconeogenesis. Recent evidence suggests that GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) can significantly improve physical activity limitations and exercise capacity in obese patients with HFpEF. The possible cardioprotective mechanisms of GLP-1 RAs include reducing epicardial fat tissue thickness, preventing activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, improving myocardial energy metabolism, reducing systemic inflammation and cardiac oxidative stress, and delaying the progression of atherosclerosis. This review examines the impact of obesity on the underlying mechanisms of HFpEF, summarizes the trial data on cardiovascular outcomes of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and highlights the potential cardioprotective mechanisms of GLP-1 RAs to give a pathophysiological and clinical rationale for using GLP-1 RAs in obese HFpEF patients.

Options for patients with out-of-control blood pressure: after all avenues have been exhausted.

INTRODUCTION: Uncontrolled hypertension is the leading risk factor for global mortality. Most hypertensive patients can be controlled with standard medication combinations, but some may not respond adequately to ≥3 or even to ≥5 antihypertensive agents. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we summarize the recent literature on difficult-to-treat hypertension identified by a Medline search, and we discuss the options for fourth line and subsequent therapy. EXPERT OPINION: It is essential to confirm resistant hypertension with out-of-office blood pressure measurements and to consider lifestyle factors, adherence to medication and secondary causes of hypertension. When true resistant hypertension is confirmed and blood pressure is not controlled with an optimal triple combination, preferably as a fixed dose combination tablet, spironolactone is usually recommended as the fourth medication. Comorbid conditions should be treated as appropriate with sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sacubitril-valsartan or finerenone. Renal denervation appears to be a useful addition to overcome some of the problems of medication adherence. The endothelin antagonist aprocitentan may be a final option in some countries. Of the drugs in development, the RNA based therapeutics that inhibit angiotensinogen synthesis appear to be some of the most promising.

Semaglutide for the management of diabesity: The real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: Diabesity (diabetes as a consequence of obesity) has emerged as a huge healthcare challenge across the globe due to the obesity pandemic. Judicious use of antidiabetic medications including semaglutide is important for optimal management of diabesity as proven by multiple randomized controlled trials. However, more real-world data is needed to further improve the clinical practice. AIM: To study the real-world benefits and side effects of using semaglutide to manage patients with diabesity. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of semaglutide use in managing patients with diabesity in a large academic hospital in the United States. Several parameters were analyzed including demographic information, the data on improvement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight reduction and insulin dose adjustments at 6 and 12 months, as well as at the latest follow up period. The data was obtained from the electronic patient records between January 2019 to May 2023. RESULTS: 106 patients (56 males) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), mean age 60.8 ± 11.2 years, mean durations of T2DM 12.4 ± 7.2 years and mean semaglutide treatment for 2.6 ± 1.1 years were included. Semaglutide treatment was associated with significant improvement in diabesity outcomes such as mean weight reductions from baseline 110.4 ± 24.6 kg to 99.9 ± 24.9 kg at 12 months and 96.8 ± 22.9 kg at latest follow up and HbA1c improvement from baseline of 82 ± 21 mmol/mol to 67 ± 20 at 12 months and 71 ± 23 mmol/mol at the latest follow up. An insulin dose reduction from mean baseline of 95 ± 74 units to 76.5 ± 56.2 units was also observed at the latest follow up. Side effects were mild and mainly gastrointestinal like bloating and nausea improving with prolonged use of semaglutide. CONCLUSION: Semaglutide treatment is associated with significant improvement in diabesity outcomes such as reduction in body weight, HbA1c and insulin doses without major adverse effects. Reviews of largescale real-world data are expected to inform better clinical practice decision making to improve the care of patients with diabesity.

Seven glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and polyagonists for weight loss in patients with obesity or overweight: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide evidence-based support and a reference for the efficacy and safety of seven glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and polyagonists for weight loss in patients with obesity or overweight through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with an intervention duration of at least 16 weeks assessing seven GLP-1 receptor agonists and polyagonists (mazdutide, 6 or 4.5 mg; retatrutide, 12 or 8 mg; tirzepatide, 15 or 10 mg; liraglutide, 3.0 mg; semaglutide, 2.4 mg; orforglipron, 45 or 36 mg; and beinaglutide, 0.2 mg) in patient with obesity or overweight was searched using three databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase) from creation to August 30, 2024. The primary outcome was the percentage change in body weight from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes in waist circumference, hemoglobin A1c, and fasting plasma glucose level from baseline; adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse event withdrawal, and hypoglycemic events. We conducted a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis to analyze the data extracted from the RCTs using Stata 16.1 software. RESULTS: Twenty-seven RCTs of seven GLP-1 receptor agonists and polyagonists and 15,584 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. In terms of efficacy, compared with placebo, retatrutide 12 mg (-22.10 % in body weight and - 17.00 cm in waist circumference), retatrutide 8 mg (-20.70 % and - 15.90 cm), and tirzepatide 15 mg (-16.53 % and - 13.23 cm) were the three most efficacious treatments for reducing body weight and waist circumference. However, these treatments were less effective in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In addition, patients with a high body mass index (BMI) or longer treatment cycles exhibited significantly greater weight loss than those with a low BMI or shorter treatment cycles. In terms of safety, patients without T2DM had a higher incidence of adverse events than those with T2DM. None of the interventions increased the incidence of serious adverse or hypoglycemic events (˂54 mg/dL). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse event withdrawal for all interventions in head-to-head comparisons. In addition, disparities in race, BMI, and treatment cycles did not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events. Finally, the sensitivity and publication bias analyses indicated that the basic analysis results were reliable. CONCLUSION: Retatrutide (both doses) and tirzepatide exhibited superior efficacy compared to other GLP-1 receptor agonists and polyagonists in reducing body weight and waist circumference. Patients without T2DM, those with a high BMI, and individuals undergoing longer treatment cycles demonstrated significantly greater weight loss and reductions in waist circumference. Dual or triple receptor agonists (GLP-1 plus glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and/or Glucagon receptor) are more effective for weight loss than GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and risk of gastrointestinal cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are commonly used for glucose lowering and weight-loss. However, their association with gastrointestinal cancer remains uncertain. This meta-analysis assesses the risk of gastrointestinal cancer in patients treated with GLP-1 RAs. METHODS: We searched Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from inception to November 15, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with at least 24 weeks of safety follow-up. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using fixed- and random-effect models. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. RESULTS: We included 90 RCTs with 124,791 participants, with an average follow-up of 3.1 years per participant. No significant association was found between GLP-1 RAs and the risk of any gastrointestinal cancer (RRrandom=0.99, 95 % CI: 0.86-1.13), or site-specific gastrointestinal cancers including biliary tract (RR=0.98, 0.54-1.78), colorectal (RR=1.13, 0.92-1.39), gallbladder (RR=1.32, 0.43-4.00), gastric (RR=0.88, 0.58-1.33), hepatic (RR=0.79, 0.51-1.21), oesophageal (RR=0.70, 0.38-1.28), pancreatic (RR=1.05, 0.77-1.43), and small intestine cancer (RR=0.78, 0.20-3.04). The corresponding absolute risk differences excluded important impacts on risk. Additional analyses, limited to placebo-controlled trials, high-dose studies, or those with a follow-up duration of ≥5 years, confirmed these findings. Risk of bias was generally low and the certainty of evidence was high for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found no significant impact of GLP-1 RAs on gastrointestinal cancer risk. Long-term safety monitoring of these agents remains important. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42023476762.

The Emerging Role of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in the Management of Obesity-Related Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Benefits beyond What Scales Can Measure?

Obesity is a significant predisposing factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Although a substantial proportion of individuals with HFpEF also have obesity, those with obesity are under-represented in clinical trials for heart failure. In turn, current guidelines provided limited recommendations for the medical management of this patient population. Both obesity and diabetes induce a pro-inflammatory state that can contribute to endothelial dysfunction and coronary microvascular impairment, finally resulting in HFpEF. Additionally, obesity leads to increased epicardial and chest wall adiposity, which enhances ventricular interdependence. This condition is further aggravated by plasma and blood volume expansion and excessive vasoconstriction, ultimately worsening HFpEF. Despite the well-documented benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists in subjects with diabetes, obesity, or both, their role in obesity-related HFpEF remains unclear. In light of the recently published literature, this review aims to investigate the potential mechanisms and synthesize the available clinical evidence regarding the role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with obesity-related HFpEF.

Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Updated Review.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become one of the most popular medications for patients with diabetes and obesity. Due to their effects on gut motility via central or parasympathetic pathways, there have been concerns about an increased incidence of retained gastric contents and risk of aspiration in the perioperative period. Hence, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) recommends holding GLP-1 RAs on the procedure day or a week before the elective procedure based on the respective daily or weekly formulations, regardless of the dose, indication (obesity or diabetes), or procedure type. On the contrary, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) advises an individualized approach, stating that more data are needed to decide if and when the GLP-1 RAs should be held prior to elective endoscopy. Several retrospective and prospective studies, along with meta-analyses, have been published since then evaluating the role of GLP-1 RAs in patients scheduled for endoscopic procedures. In this review, we discuss the current clinical guidelines and available studies regarding the effect of GLP-1 RAs on GI endoscopies.

Assessing Cardiovascular Target Attainment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Tertiary Diabetes Center in Romania.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) share a bidirectional link, and the innovative antidiabetic molecules GLP-1 Ras and SGLT-2is have proven cardiac and renal benefits, respectively. This study aimed to evaluate CV risk categories, along with lipid-lowering and antidiabetic treatments, in patients with T2DM from a real-life setting in Romania. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional evaluation was conducted on 405 consecutively admitted patients with T2DM in an ambulatory setting, assessing them according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for moderate, high, and very high CV risk categories. RESULTS: The average age of the group was 58 ± 9.96 years, with 38.5% being female. The mean HbA1C level was 7.2 ± 1.7%. Comorbidities included HBP in 88.1% of patients, with a mean SBP and DBP of 133.2 ± 13.7 mm Hg and 79.9 ± 9 mm Hg, respectively, and obesity in 66.41%, with a mean BMI of 33 ± 6.33 kg/m2. The mean LDL-C levels varied by CV risk category: 90.1 ± 34.22 mg/dL in very high risk, 98.63 ± 33.26 mg/dL in high risk, and 105 ± 37.1 mg/dL in moderate risk. Prescribed treatments included metformin (100%), statins (77.5%), GLP-1 Ras (29.4%), and SGLT-2is (29.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In Romania, patients with T2DM often achieve glycemic control targets but fail to meet composite targets that include glycemic, BP, and lipid control. Additionally, few patients benefit from innovative glucose-lowering therapies with proven cardio-renal benefits or from statins.

A very rare cause of markedly elevated CA 19-9: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

AIM: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Various adverse reactions have been gradually reported. This case presents a rare phenomenon in which a GLP1-RA caused a marked elevation in carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA 19-9) without evidence of a tumor. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was utilized, incorporating medical history obtained from regular outpatient consultations and follow-up visits, along with ancillary examinations derived from laboratory tests and imaging. RESULTS: The use of a GLP1-RA for treating T2DM resulted in an increase in CA 19-9 without evidence of a tumor, which gradually normalized after discontinuation of the drug. CONCLUSION: GLP1-RAs may lead to elevated levels of tumor markers during the treatment of T2DM, necessitating monitoring during therapy. Antidiabetic management should be adjusted on an individual basis as needed.

Effect of Semaglutide on Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Obesity-Related Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and is a key driver for the development and progression of heart failure (HF). Once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) has been shown to improve HF-related symptoms and physical limitations, body weight, and exercise function in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the effects of semaglutide on cardiac structure and function in this population remain unknown. OBJECTIVES: In this echocardiography substudy of the STEP-HFpEF Program, we evaluated treatment effects of once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) vs placebo on cardiac structure and function. METHODS: Echocardiography at randomization and 52 weeks was performed in 491 of 1,145 participants (43%) in the STEP-HFpEF Program (pooled STEP-HFpEF [Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity and HFpEF] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity, HFpEF, and Type 2 Diabetes] trials). The prespecified primary outcome was change in left atrial (LA) volume, with changes in other echocardiography parameters evaluated as secondary outcomes. Treatment effects of semaglutide vs placebo were assessed using analysis of covariance stratified by trial and body mass index, with adjustment for baseline parameter values. RESULTS: Overall, baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were balanced among those receiving semaglutide (n = 253) and placebo (n = 238). Between baseline and 52 weeks, semaglutide attenuated progression of LA remodeling (estimated mean difference [EMD] in LA volume, -6.13 mL; 95% CI: -9.85 to -2.41 mL; P = 0.0013) and right ventricular (RV) enlargement (EMD in RV end-diastolic area: -1.99 cm2; 95% CI: -3.60 to -0.38 cm2; P = 0.016; EMD in RV end-systolic area: -1.41 cm2; 95% CI: -2.42 to -0.40] cm2; P = 0.0064) compared with placebo. Semaglutide additionally improved E-wave velocity (EMD: -5.63 cm/s; 95% CI: -9.42 to -1.84 cm/s; P = 0.0037), E/A (early/late mitral inflow velocity) ratio (EMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.04; P = 0.0075), and E/e' (early mitral inflow velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity) average (EMD: -0.79; 95% CI: -1.60 to 0.01; P = 0.05). These associations were not modified by diabetes or atrial fibrillation status. Semaglutide did not significantly affect left ventricular dimensions, mass, or systolic function. Greater weight loss with semaglutide was associated with greater reduction in LA volume (Pinteraction = 0.033) but not with changes in E-wave velocity, E/e' average, or RV end-diastolic area. CONCLUSIONS: In the STEP-HFpEF Program echocardiography substudy, semaglutide appeared to improve adverse cardiac remodeling compared with placebo, further suggesting that treatment with semaglutide may be disease modifying among patients with obesity-related HFpEF. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF]; NCT04788511; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP-HFpEF DM]; NCT04916470).

Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Cardiac Function, Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are emerging glucose-lowering agents primarily used in managing diabetes and obesity. Recently, GLP-1 RAs have garnered attention for their cardiovascular benefits beyond glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, exhibiting patterns previously seen in cardiovascular outcomes trials on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, which now receive a high level of recommendation for the treatment of heart failure (HF). GLP-1 RAs have been increasingly investigated in HF cohorts, but mainly in small-scale studies reporting inconclusive findings regarding clinical outcomes and different safety profiles in HF patients with reduced and preserved ejection fractions. This review discusses the effects of GLP-1 RAs on surrogate HF outcomes, such as cardiac structure and function, exercise capacity and quality of life, in HF patients across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction, to provide insights into the potential of these agents to be investigated in large clinical trials to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on glycated haemoglobin and continuous glucose monitoring metrics as adjunctive therapy to insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics as an adjunct to insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted through Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to 27 May 2024. Dual-independent study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Results were summarized using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Six RCTs were identified, involving a total of 378 individuals with T1D. The use of GLP-1RAs in addition to standard insulin therapy was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.21%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.36 to -0.06; p = 0.007) and a similar time in range (TIR) compared to placebo (MD -0.22%, 95% CI -2.39 to 1.95; p = 0.84). GLP-1RA therapy resulted in a significantly higher time below range (MD 1.13%, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.76; p < 0.001) and a lower time above range compared with placebo (MD -1.83%, 95% CI -2.51 to -1.15; p < 0.001). Nonsignificant differences were noted for the secondary outcomes, including the mean amplitude of glucose excursion, continuous overall net glycaemic action for 60 min, mean daily glucose, coefficient of variation, and mean standard deviation of weekly glucose levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that, in individuals with T1D, add-on therapy with GLP-1RAs does not confer significant benefits in terms of CGM metrics and is associated with a longer time below the target glycaemic range.

Impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on diabetic retinopathy: A meta-analysis of clinical studies emphasising retinal changes as a primary outcome.

BACKGROUND: To determine if glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are associated with the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to February 2024 to identify clinical studies reporting the development of and changes in DR as the primary outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes taking GLP-1RA, insulin, or oral antidiabetic medication (OAD). Two researchers independently completed the search and referred to a third as necessary. Data for meta-analysis was pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Analysis of seven studies representing 242 537 patients showed a significantly decreased risk of incidence of DR between GLP-1RA and insulin use (RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.48, 0.91), p = 0.01). There was no difference in the risk of DR complications (e.g., vitreous haemorrhage, retinal detachment, or requiring treatment with intravitreal injections, lasers, vitrectomy). Between GLP-1RA and OAD use, there was no difference in the risk of incidence of DR, while there was a significantly increased risk of DR complications (RR = 1.39, 95% CI (1.07, 1.80), p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate no elevated risk of incidence of DR linked to GLP-1RA compared to insulin. In fact, GLP-1RA may offer potential advantages over insulin regarding the overall incidence of DR. The increased risk of DR requiring treatment and associated complications in the GLP-1RA group compared to OAD may be due to the transient progression of DR associated with a rapid decrease in HbA1c - a phenomenon not specific to GLP-1RA and warrants further investigation.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use in pregnancy: a review.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are peptide analogues that are used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. The first medication in this class, exenatide, was approved in 2005, and these medications, specifically semaglutide, have become more popular in recent years due to their pronounced effects on glycemic control, weight reduction, and cardiovascular health. Due to successful weight loss from these medications, many women previously diagnosed with oligomenorrhea and unable to conceive have experienced unplanned pregnancies while taking the medications. However, there are currently little data for clinicians to use in counseling patients in cases of accidental periconceptional exposure. In some studies examining small animals exposed to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in pregnancy, there has been evidence of adverse outcomes in the offspring, including decreased fetal growth, skeletal and visceral anomalies, and embryonic death. Although there are no prospective studies in humans, case reports, cohort studies, and population-based studies have not shown a pattern of congenital anomalies in infants. A recent large, observational, population-based cohort study examined 938 pregnancies affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus and compared outcomes from periconceptional exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and insulin. The authors concluded there was not a significantly increased risk of major congenital malformations in patients taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, although there was no information on maternal glycemic control or diabetic fetopathy. As diabetic embryopathy is directly related to the degree of maternal hyperglycemia and not the diagnosis of diabetes itself, it is not possible to make this conclusion without this information. Furthermore, there is little evidence available regarding fetal growth restriction, embryonic or fetal death, or other potential complications. At this time, patients should be counseled there is not enough evidence to predict any adverse effects, or the lack thereof, of periconceptional exposure of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists during pregnancy. We recommend that all patients use contraception to prevent unintended pregnancy while taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the technological advancements in catheter ablation strategies, the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) post-ablation remains a concern that requires further investigation. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have shown a significant effect on weight reduction, which in turn is associated with freedom from AF recurrence in both patients who are obese and not obese undergoing ablation. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the available evidence on the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in maintaining sinus rhythm post-ablation. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched until June 9, 2024. Double-independent study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled using DerSimonian-Laird random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Three propensity score-matched studies (n = 6031 participants) were analyzed. Over a 12-months follow-up, the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists was associated with a significant reduction in AF recurrence compared to controls, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.549, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.315, 0.956], P = 0.034; I2 = 57%. No significant heterogeneity was observed (Q statistic = 4.6, heterogeneity P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists is associated with a lower risk of AF recurrence in patients receiving AF ablation therapy. Further large-scale randomized trials are necessary to explore the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in maintaining ablation outcomes over the long term.