Impact of Heart Transplant Allocation Change on Waitlist Mortality and Posttransplant Mortality in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: In October 2018, the US heart transplant (HT) allocation system was revised giving patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) intermediate priority status. Few studies have examined the impact of this policy change on outcomes among patients with LVAD. We sought to determine how the allocation change impacted waitlist and posttransplant mortality in patients with LVAD. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for patients with LVAD who were listed for or underwent HT between October 2016 and October 2021. We evaluated waitlist mortality using competing risks analysis and a multivariable Fine-Gray model, and posttransplant mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 3835 patients with LVAD listed for HT and 3486 patients with LVAD who underwent HT during the study period. Listing for HT preallocation change was significantly associated with an increased risk of waitlist mortality (Gray P=0.0058) compared with postallocation change. After adjustment for covariates, mortality differences by listing era were attenuated, but LVAD brand was significantly associated with waitlist mortality (HM3 versus HMII; hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.69]; P=0.002; HVAD versus HMII; hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48-1.30]; P=0.36; overall P=0.004). In contrast, HT postallocation change was associated with increased posttransplant mortality (log-rank P=0.0172) compared with preallocation change. In a multivariable analysis, the association with posttransplant mortality between transplant eras was attenuated, but ischemic time (hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.26]; P<0.001) and status at time of HT (Status 1-3 versus 4; hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.04-1.61]; P=0.02) were significantly associated with posttransplant mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with LVAD, lower waitlist mortality postallocation change was likely driven by improved LVAD technology. Higher posttransplant mortality following the allocation change was largely attributable to longer ischemic times and patient acuity.

Multicenter exploration of specialist palliative care in patients with left ventricular assist devices - a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The number of advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is increasing. Despite guideline-recommendations, little is known about specialist palliative care involvement in LVAD-patients, especially in Europe. This study aims to investigate timing and setting of specialist palliative care in LVAD-patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in 2022. Specialist palliative care services in German LVAD-centers were identified and invited to participate. Forty adult LVAD-patients (mean age 65 years (SD 7.9), 90% male) from seven centers that received a specialist palliative care consultation during hospitalization were included. RESULTS: In 37 (67.3%) of the 55 LVAD-centers, specialist palliative care was available. The median duration between LVAD-implantation and first specialist palliative care contact was 17 months (IQR 6.3-50.3 months). Median duration between consultation and death was seven days (IQR 3-28 days). 65% of consults took place in an intensive/intermediate care unit with half of the patients having a Do-Not-Resuscitate order. Care planning significantly increased during involvement (advance directives before: n = 15, after: n = 19, p < 0.001; DNR before: n = 20, after: n = 28, p < 0.001). Symptom burden as assessed at first specialist palliative care contact was higher compared to the consultation requests (request: median 3 symptoms (IQR 3-6); first contact: median 9 (IQR 6-10); p < 0.001) with a focus on weakness, anxiety, overburdening of next-of-kin and dyspnea. More than 70% of patients died during index hospitalization, one third of these in a palliative care unit. CONCLUSIONS: This largest European multicenter investigation of LVAD-patients receiving specialist palliative care shows a late integration and high physical and psychosocial symptom burden. This study highlights the urgent need for earlier integration to identify and address poorly controlled symptoms. Further studies and educational efforts are needed to close the gap between guideline-recommendations and the current status quo.

Catecholamine-Induced Cardiomyopathy Secondary to Pheochromocytoma Rescued With Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device: Novel Application of the Impella CP in a Pediatric Patient.

Background: Catecholamine-induced cardiomyopathy is an uncommon complication of pheochromocytoma. Pheochromocytoma is a rare tumor that predominantly occurs in adults, making catecholamine-induced cardiomyopathy secondary to pheochromocytoma in children an exceedingly rare presentation. Treatment typically consists of medical management followed by surgical resection. Mechanical support, typically salvage therapy with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, has been used in adult patients with cardiogenic shock and after cardiac arrest, but to our knowledge, the use of mechanical support has not been described in pediatric patients. Case Report: A 16-year-old female presented with cardiogenic shock resulting from catecholamine-induced cardiomyopathy secondary to pheochromocytoma. She was treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device to allow myocardial recovery while medical therapy was optimized. Given the early initiation, the patient's myocardial recovery was prompt, and only 3 days of device support were required. She was discharged in good condition and subsequently underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic resection of the tumor a few weeks later. Conclusion: In pediatric patients with catecholamine-induced cardiomyopathy secondary to pheochromocytoma, aggressive measures of support-including mechanical support and infrequently used options such as percutaneous left ventricular assist devices-should be considered early in treatment to maintain adequate cardiac output, avoid cardiac arrest, and allow for prompt myocardial recovery.

Evaluation and Management of Kidney Dysfunction in Advanced Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Early identification of kidney dysfunction in patients with advanced heart failure is crucial for timely interventions. In addition to elevations in serum creatinine, kidney dysfunction encompasses inadequate maintenance of sodium and volume homeostasis, retention of uremic solutes, and disrupted endocrine functions. Hemodynamic derangements and maladaptive neurohormonal upregulations contribute to fluctuations in kidney indices and electrolytes that may recover with guideline-directed medical therapy. Quantifying the extent of underlying irreversible intrinsic kidney disease is crucial in predicting whether optimization of congestion and guideline-directed medical therapy can stabilize kidney function. This scientific statement focuses on clinical management of patients experiencing kidney dysfunction through the trajectory of advanced heart failure, with specific focus on (1) the conceptual framework for appropriate evaluation of kidney dysfunction within the context of clinical trajectories in advanced heart failure, including in the consideration of advanced heart failure therapies; (2) preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative approaches to evaluation and management of kidney disease for advanced surgical therapies (durable left ventricular assist device/heart transplantation) and kidney replacement therapies; and (3) the key concepts in palliative care and decision-making processes unique to individuals with concomitant advanced heart failure and kidney disease.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Background: Selected patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for heart transplantation could benefit from left ventricular assist device therapy as 'destination therapy'. There is evidence of the efficacy of destination therapy; however, it is not currently commissioned within the United Kingdom National Health Service due to the lack of economic evidence. Objective: What is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a left ventricular assist device compared to medical management for patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for heart transplantation (destination therapy)? Methods: A systematic review of evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy was undertaken including, where feasible, a network meta-analysis to provide an indirect estimate of the relative effectiveness of currently available left ventricular assist devices compared to medical management. For the systematic reviews, data sources searched (up to 11 January 2022) were Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid for primary studies, and Epistemonikos and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for relevant systematic reviews. Trial registers were also searched, along with data and reports from intervention-specific registries. Economic studies were identified in EconLit, CEA registry and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED). The searches were supplemented by checking reference lists of included studies. An economic model (Markov) was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices compared to medical management from the United Kingdom National Health Service/personal social service perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore uncertainties. Where possible, all analyses focused on the only currently available left ventricular assist device (HeartMate 3TM, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) in the United Kingdom. Results: The clinical effectiveness review included 134 studies (240 articles). There were no studies directly comparing HeartMate 3 and medical management (a randomised trial is ongoing). The currently available left ventricular assist device improves patient survival and reduces stroke rates and complications compared to earlier devices and relative to medical management. For example, survival at 24 months is 77% with the HeartMate 3 device compared to 59% with the HeartMate II (MOMENTUM 3 trial). An indirect comparison demonstrated a reduction in mortality compared to medical management [relative risk of death 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.47); 24 months; this study]. The cost-effectiveness review included 5 cost analyses and 14 economic evaluations covering different generations of devices and with different perspectives. The reported incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained compared to medical management were lower for later generations of devices [as low as £46,207 (2019 prices; United Kingdom perspective; time horizon at least 5 years)]. The economic evaluation used different approaches to obtain the relative effects of current left ventricular assist devices compared to medical management from the United Kingdom National Health Service/personal social service perspective. All gave similar incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £53,496-58,244 per quality-adjusted life-year gained - lifetime horizon. Model outputs were sensitive to parameter estimates relating to medical management. The findings did not materially differ on exploratory subgroup analyses based on the severity of heart failure. Limitations: There was no direct evidence comparing the clinical effectiveness of HeartMate 3 to medical management. Indirect comparisons made were based on limited data from heterogeneous studies regarding the severity of heart failure (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support score distribution) and possible for survival only. Furthermore, the cost of medical management of advanced heart failure in the United Kingdom is not clear. Conclusions: Using cost-effectiveness criteria applied in the United Kingdom, left ventricular assist devices compared to medical management for patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for heart transplant may not be cost-effective. When available, data from the ongoing evaluation of HeartMate 3 compared to medical management can be used to update cost-effectiveness estimates. An audit of the costs of medical management in the United Kingdom is required to further decrease uncertainty in the economic evaluation. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020158987. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128996) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 38. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

The majority of patients with advanced heart failure would be unsuitable for heart transplantation due to their age and comorbidities but selected patients could benefit from a left ventricular assist device. Left ventricular assist device therapy for such patients is known as 'destination therapy'. This is a long-term therapy that involves implanting a battery-powered pump to support the patient's heart. The purpose of this project was to collect and assess the research evidence on the effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices when used for destination therapy, and to estimate value for money compared to medical management from the United Kingdom National Health Service/personal social service perspective. This research identified that the currently available left ventricular assist device improves patient survival as well as reducing stroke rates and complications compared to earlier devices and relative to medical management. However, there is uncertainty in the evidence due to the absence of studies directly comparing the current device to medical therapy alone. An ongoing clinical trial is currently assessing this. It also means there is uncertainty about whether left ventricular assist devices could provide value for money as determined currently for the United Kingdom National Health Service.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Suffering Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) can stem from multiple causes and portends poor prognosis. Prior studies have focused on acute myocardial infarction-CS; however, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF)-CS accounts for most cases. We studied patients suffering ADHF-CS to identify clinical factors, early in their trajectory, associated with a higher probability of successful outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CS were evaluated (N=1162). We studied patients who developed ADHF-CS at our hospital (N=562). Primary end point was native heart survival (NHS), defined as survival to discharge without receiving advanced HF therapies. Secondary end points were adverse events, survival, major cardiac interventions, and hospital readmissions within 1 year following index hospitalization discharge. Association of clinical data with NHS was analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 357 (63.5%) patients achieved NHS, 165 (29.2%) died, and 41 (7.3%) were discharged post advanced HF therapies. Of 398 discharged patients (70.8%), 303 (53.9%) were alive at 1 year. Patients with NHS less commonly suffered cardiac arrest, underwent intubation or pulmonary artery catheter placement, or received temporary mechanical circulatory support, had better hemodynamic and echocardiographic profiles, and had a lower vasoactive-inotropic score at shock onset. Bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, hemolysis in patients with mechanical circulatory support, and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy were less common compared with patients who died or received advanced HF therapies. After multivariable adjustments, clinical variables associated with NHS likelihood included younger age, history of systemic hypertension, absence of cardiac arrest or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy, lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and vasoactive-inotropic score, and higher tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion at shock onset (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By studying contemporary patients with ADHF-CS, we identified clinical factors that can inform clinical management and provide future research targets. Right ventricular function, renal function, pulmonary artery catheter placement, and type and timing of temporary mechanical circulatory support warrant further investigation to improve outcomes of this devastating condition.

Performance of risk scores in predicting major bleeding in left ventricular assist device recipients: a comparative external validation.

Background: Implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a crucial therapeutic option for selected end-stage heart failure patients. However, major bleeding (MB) complications postimplantation are a significant concern. Objectives: We evaluated current risk scores' predictive accuracy for MB in LVAD recipients. Methods: We conducted an observational, single-center study of LVAD recipients (HeartWare or HeartMate-3, November 2010-December 2022) in the Netherlands. The primary outcome was the first post-LVAD MB (according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [ISTH] and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS], and INTERMACS combined with intracranial bleeding [INTERMACS+] criteria). Mortality prior to MB was considered a competing event. Discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration were evaluated for the Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly score, Hepatic or Renal Disease, Ethanol Abuse, Malignancy, Older Age, Reduced Platelet Count or Function, Re-Bleeding, Hypertension, Anemia, Genetic Factors, Excessive Fall Risk and Stroke score, Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation score, Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index, venous thromboembolism score, atrial fibrillation score, and Utah Bleeding Risk Score (UBRS). Results: One hundred four patients were included (median age, 64 years; female, 20.2%; HeartWare, 90.4%; HeartMate-3, 9.6%). The cumulative MB incidence was 75.7% (95% CI 65.5%-85.9%) by ISTH and INTERMACS+ criteria and 67.0% (95% CI 56.0%-78.0%) per INTERMACS criteria over a median event-free follow-up time of 1916 days (range, 59-4521). All scores had poor discriminative ability on their intended prediction timeframe. Cumulative area under the receiving operator characteristic curve ranged from 0.49 (95% CI 0.35-0.63, venous thromboembolism-BLEED) to 0.56 (95% CI 0.47-0.65, UBRS) according to ISTH and INTERMACS+ criteria and from 0.48 (95% CI 0.40-0.56, Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) to 0.56 (95% CI 0.47-0.65, UBRS) per INTERMACS criteria. All models showed poor calibration, largely underestimating MB risk. Conclusion: Current bleeding risk scores exhibit inadequate predictive accuracy for LVAD recipients. There is a need for an accurate risk score to identify LVAD patients at high risk of MB who may benefit from patient-tailored antithrombotic therapy.

Measurement of left ventricular volume with admittance incorporated onto percutaneous ventricular assist device.

Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) incorporated with admittance electrodes have been validated in animal studies for accurate instantaneous volumetric measurements. Since miniaturization of the pVAD profile is a priority to reduce vascular complications in patients, our study aimed to validate admittance measurements using three electrodes instead of the standard four. Complex admittance was measured between an electrode pair and a pVAD metallic blood-intake tip, both with finite element analysis and on the benchtop. The catheter and electrode arrays were first simulated inside prolate ellipsoid models of the left ventricle (LV) demonstrating current flow throughout all parts of the LV as well as minimal influence of off-center catheter placement in the recorded signal. Admittance measurements were validated in 3D-printed models of healthy and dilated hearts (100-400 mL end-diastolic volumes). Minimal interference between a pVAD motor and the current signal of our admittance system was demonstrated. A modified Wei's equation focused on three electrodes was developed to be compatible with reduced profile pVADs occurring clinically, incorporated with admittance electrodes and wires. The modified equation was compared against Wei's original equation showing improved accuracy of calculated volumes. Reducing electrode footprint can simplify the incorporation of Admittance technology on any pVAD, allowing for instantaneous recognition of native heart recovery and assistance with pVAD weaning.

Predictors and Impact of Prolonged Vasoplegia After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Background: Vasoplegia after cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcomes. However, the clinical effects of vasoplegia and the significance of its duration after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation are less known. Objectives: This study aimed to identify predictors of and outcomes from transient vs prolonged vasoplegia after CF-LVAD implantation. Methods: The study was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017. Vasoplegia was defined as the presence of all of the following: mean arterial pressure ≤65 mm Hg, vasopressor (epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, or dopamine) use for >6 hours within the first 24 hours postoperatively, cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min/m2 and systemic vascular resistance <800 dyne/s/cm5, and vasodilatory shock not attributable to other causes. Prolonged vasoplegia was defined as that lasting 12 to 24 hours; transient vasoplegia was that lasting 6 to <12 hours. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors were analyzed. Results: Of the 600 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation during the study period, 182 (30.3%) developed vasoplegia. Mean patient age was similar between the vasoplegia and no-vasoplegia groups. Prolonged vasoplegia (n = 78; 13.0%), compared with transient vasoplegia (n = 104; 17.3%), was associated with greater 30-day mortality (16.7% vs 5.8%; P = 0.02). Risk factors for prolonged vasoplegia included preoperative dialysis and elevated body mass index. Conclusions: Compared with vasoplegia overall, prolonged vasoplegia was associated with worse survival after CF-LVAD implantation. Treatment to avoid or minimize progression to prolonged vasoplegia may be warranted.

Association of Patient Reported Outcomes With Caregiver Burden in Older Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Insights From the SUSTAIN-IT Study.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers of patients with advanced heart failure may experience burden in providing care, but whether changes in patient health status are associated with caregiver burden is unknown. METHODS: This observational study included older patients (60-80 years old) receiving advanced surgical heart failure therapies and their caregivers at 13 US sites. Patient health status was assessed using the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (range, 0-100; higher scores are better). Caregiver burden was assessed using the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale, which measures time on task (OCBS-time) and task difficulty (OCBS-difficulty; range, 1-5; lower scores are better). Measurements occurred before surgery and 12 months after in 3 advanced heart failure cohorts: patients receiving long-term left ventricular assist device support; heart transplantation with pretransplant left ventricular assist device support; and heart transplantation without pretransplant left ventricular assist device support. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify predictors of change in OCBS-time and OCBS-difficulty at 12 months. RESULTS: Of 162 caregivers, the mean age was 61.0±9.4 years, 139 (86%) were female, and 140 (86%) were the patient's spouse. At 12 months, 99 (61.1%) caregivers experienced improved OCBS-time, and 61 (37.7%) experienced improved OCBS-difficulty (versus no change or worse OCBS). A 10-point higher baseline 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire predicted lower 12-month OCBS-time (ß=-0.09 [95% CI, -0.14 to -0.03]; P<0.001) and OCBS-difficulty (ß=-0.08 [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.05]; P<0.001). Each 10-point improvement in the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire predicted lower 12-month OCBS-time (ß=-0.07 [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.03]; P=0.002) and OCBS-difficulty (ß=-0.09 [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.06]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among survivors at 12 months, baseline and change in patient health status were associated with subsequent caregiver time on task and task difficulty in dyads receiving advanced heart failure surgical therapies, highlighting the potential for serial 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire assessments to identify caregivers at risk of increased burden. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT02568930.

Overexpression of ATP5F1A in Cardiomyocytes Promotes Cardiac Reverse Remodeling.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of cardiac reverse remodeling (CRR) mediated by the left ventricular assist device remains unclear. This study aims to identify the specific cell type responsible for CRR and develop the therapeutic target that promotes CRR. METHODS: The nuclei were extracted from the left ventricular tissue of 4 normal controls, 4 CRR patients, and 4 no cardiac reverse remodeling patients and then subjected to single-nucleus RNA sequencing for identifying key cell types responsible for CRR. Gene overexpression in transverse aortic constriction and dilated cardiomyopathy heart failure mouse model (C57BL/6J background) and pathological staining were performed to validate the results of single-nucleus RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Ten cell types were identified among 126 156 nuclei. Cardiomyocytes in CRR patients expressed higher levels of ATP5F1A than the other 2 groups. The macrophages in CRR patients expressed more anti-inflammatory genes and functioned in angiogenesis. Endothelial cells that elevated in no cardiac reverse remodeling patients were involved in the inflammatory response. Echocardiography showed that overexpressing ATP5F1A through cardiomyocyte-specific adeno-associated virus 9 demonstrated an ability to improve heart function and morphology. Pathological staining showed that overexpressing ATP5F1A could reduce fibrosis and cardiomyocyte size in the heart failure mouse model. CONCLUSIONS: The present results of single-nucleus RNA sequencing and heart failure mouse model indicated that ATP5F1A could mediate CRR and supported the development of therapeutics for overexpressing ATP5F1A in promoting CRR.

Characterization of injuries and dressings of left ventricular assist device drivelines / Caracterización de lesiones y apósitos de drivelines de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular izquierda / Caracterização de lesões e curativos de drivelinesde dispositivos de assistência ventricular esquerda

Aim: To Identify and characterize driveline-related injuries among patients with HeartMate II® or HeartMate 3®and assess the dressings used during hospital stay. Method: Observational, cross-sectional study conducted between 2015 and 2023 at a large hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Results: The sample consisted of 18 patients, with driveline injuries identified in 66.7%, categorized into stages one (83.3%), two (8.3%), and four (8.3%). Of these, 66.6% were diagnosed with driveline infection according to the Utah classification: stages two (50%), three (37.5%), and four (12.5%). A correlation was found between the occurrence of injuries and longer support time (p=0.035) and the presence of a diagnosis of driveline infections (p=0.013). The solutions most frequently used were Chloraprep™ (27.8%), Aqueous Chlorhexidine 0.5% (22.2%), and Saline 0.9% (22.2%), while the dressings were IV3000™ (72.2 %), Excilon™ (44.4%), and Biatain®Ag (33.3%). Conclusion: Driveline dressings are not standardized, indicating the need for new protocols and guidelines based on studies of high methodological quality and presenting robust evidence of the best solutions and dressings to prevent complications and promote better outcomes. (AU)

Objetivos: Identificar y caracterizar lesiones relacionadas con el driveline en pacientes con HeartMate II® o HeartMate 3® y evaluar los apósitos utilizados durante el ingreso hospitalario. Método: Estudio observacional, transversal, realizado entre 2015 y 2023, en un hospital de gran porte de São Paulo, Brasil. Resultados: La muestra estuvo conformada por 18 pacientes, identificándose lesiones de driveline en el 66,7%, categorizadas en estadios uno (83,3%), dos (8,3%) y cuatro (8,3%). De estos, el 66,6% fueron diagnosticados con infección de driveline con la clasificación de Utah en estadios dos (50%), tres (37,5%) y cuatro (12,5%). Hubo correlación entre la aparición de lesiones y el mayor tiempo de soporte (p=0,035) y la presencia del diagnóstico de infección del driveline (p=0,013). Las soluciones más frecuentes fueron Chloraprep™ (27,8%), Clorhexidina acuosa 0,5% (22,2%) y Salino 0,9% (22,2%), y los apósitos fueron IV3000™ (72,2%), Excilon™ (44,4%) y Biatain®Ag. (33,3%). Conclusión: Falta estandarización de los apósitos de drivelines, destacando la necesidad de nuevos protocolos y guías con estudios de alta calidad metodológica y con evidencia sólida sobre las mejores soluciones y coberturas, previniendo complicaciones y promoviendo mejores resultados. (AU)

Objetivos: Identificar e caracterizar as lesões relacionadas ao driveline em usuários de HeartMate II® ou HeartMate 3®e avaliar os curativos utilizados durante a internação hospitalar. Método: Estudo observacional, transversal, com dados analisados entre os anos de 2015 e 2023, em um hospital de grande porte de São Paulo, Brasil. Resultados: A amostra foi composta de 18 pacientes, sendo identificadas lesões de driveline em 66,7%, categorizadas em estágio um (83,3%), dois (8,3%) e quatro (8,3%). Destes, 66,6% apresentavam diagnóstico de infecção de driveline com a classificação de Utah de estágio dois (50%), três (37,5%) e quatro (12,5%). Houve correlação entre a ocorrência de lesões e o maior tempo de suporte (p=0,035) e a presença do diagnóstico de infecção do driveline (p=0,013). As soluções mais frequentes foram Chloraprep™ (27,8%), Clorexidina Aquosa 0,5% (22,2%) e Soro Fisiológico 0,9% (22,2%), e as coberturas IV3000™ (72,2%), Excilon™ (44,4%) e Biatain®Ag (33,3%). Conclusão: Nota-se ausência da padronização de curativos de drivelines, destacando a necessidade de novos protocolos e diretrizes com estudos de alta qualidade metodológica e com evidência robusta das melhores soluções e coberturas, prevenindo complicações e promovendo melhores resultados. (AU)

Pre-left ventricular assist device endoscopic evaluation does not reduce the risk of later gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study.

Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication after placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Some institutions attempt to mitigate post-LVAD GIB using preoperative endoscopy. Our study evaluated whether preoperative endoscopy was associated with a lower risk of post-LVAD GIB. Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent LVAD insertion from 2010-2019 at 3 academic sites. A total of 398 study participants were categorized based on whether they underwent preoperative endoscopy or not. The follow-up period was 1 year and the primary outcome was GIB. Secondary outcomes were severe bleeding and intraprocedural complications. Results: A total of 114 patients experienced GIB within 1 year, with a higher rate in the endoscopy cohort (36.4% vs. 24.8%, P=0.015). After adjusting for covariables, the endoscopy cohort remained at increased risk of GIB (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.976; P=0.032). Severe bleeding was common (47.4%). Arteriovenous malformations (48 cases) and peptic ulcer disease (17 cases) were the most identified sources of GIB. Only 1 minor adverse event occurred during preoperative endoscopy. Conclusions: Our study suggests that pre-LVAD endoscopy is associated with a higher risk of GIB post LVAD, despite controlling for confounders. While this was an observational study and may not have captured all confounders, it appears that endoscopic screening may not be warranted.

Case study with dosimetric analysis: Total body irradiation to a patient with a left ventricular assist device.

Key Clinical Message: A patient presented with cardiogenic shock, requiring the implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and acute myeloblastic leukemia. This necessitated total body irradiation (TBI) while balancing dose reduction to the LVAD components to avoid potential radiation damage. Here we outline our treatment approach and dose estimates to the LVAD. Abstract: This case report discusses the delivery of TBI to a patient with an LVAD. This treatment required radiation-dose determinations and consequential reductions for the heart, LVAD, and an external controller connected to the LVAD. The patient was treated using a traditional 16MV anterior posterior (AP)/posterior anterior (PA) technique at a source-to-surface-distance of 515 cm for 400 cGy in two fractions. A 3 cm thick Cerrobend block was placed on the beam spoiler to reduce dose to the heart and LVAD to 150 cGy. The external controller was placed in a 1 cm thick acrylic box to reduce neutron dose and positioned as far from the treatment fields as achievable. In vivo measurements were made using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) placed inside the box at distances of 2 cm, 8.5 cm, and 14 cm from the field edge, and on the patient along the central axis and centered behind the LVAD block. Further ion chamber measurements were made using a solid water phantom to more accurately estimate the dose delivered to the LVAD. Neutron dose measurements were also conducted. The total estimated dose to the controller ranged from 135.3 cGy to 91.5 cGy. The LVAD block reduced the surface dose to the patient to 271.6 cGy (68.1%). The block transmission factors of the 3 cm Cerrobend block measured in the phantom were 45% at 1 cm depth and decreased asymptotically to around 30% at 3 cm depth. Applying these transmission factors to the in vivo measurements yielded a dose of 120 cGy to the implanted device. The neutron dose the LVAD region is estimated around 0.46 cGy. Physical limitations of the controller made it impossible to completely avoid dose. Shielding is recommended. The block had limited dose reduction to the surface, due to secondary particles, but appropriately reduced the dose at 3 cm and beyond. More research on LVADs dose limits would be beneficial.

Early Outcomes in Patients With LVAD Undergoing Heart Transplant via Use of the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant (HT) in recipients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is associated with poor early post-HT outcomes, including primary graft dysfunction (PGD). As complicated heart explants in recipients with LVADs may produce longer ischemic times, innovations in donor heart preservation may yield improved post-HT outcomes. The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System is an organ preservation technology that maintains donor heart temperatures between 4 °C and 8 °C, which may minimize ischemic and cold-induced graft injuries. This analysis sought to identify whether the use of SherpaPak versus traditional cold storage was associated with differential outcomes among patients with durable LVAD undergoing HT. METHODS: Global Utilization and Registry Database for Improved Heart Preservation-Heart (NCT04141605) is a multicenter registry assessing post-HT outcomes comparing 2 methods of donor heart preservation: SherpaPak versus traditional cold storage. A retrospective review of all patients with durable LVAD who underwent HT was performed. Outcomes assessed included rates of PGD, post-HT mechanical circulatory support use, and 30-day and 1-year survival. RESULTS: SherpaPak (n=149) and traditional cold storage (n=178) patients had similar baseline characteristics. SherpaPak use was associated with reduced PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.99]; P=0.045) and severe PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.75]; P=0.009), despite an increased total ischemic time in the SherpaPak group. Propensity matched analysis also noted a trend toward reduced intensive care unit (SherpaPak 7.5±6.4 days versus traditional cold storage 11.3±18.8 days; P=0.09) and hospital (SherpaPak 20.5±11.9 days versus traditional cold storage 28.7±37.0 days; P=0.06) lengths of stay. The 30-day and 1-year survival was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: SherpaPak use was associated with improved early post-HT outcomes among patients with LVAD undergoing HT. This innovation in preservation technology may be an option for HT candidates at increased risk for PGD. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04141605.

Noncardiac Surgery in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A 11-Year Institutional Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Limited options in the end-stage treatment of heart failure have led to increased use of left ventricular assist devices. For this reason, the rate of non-cardiac surgeries in patients with left ventricular assist devices is also increasing. Our study aims to analyze surgical rate, anesthesia management, and results by reviewing our 11-year experience with patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery receiving left ventricular assist devices support. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 57 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery and 67 non-cardiac surgical procedures among 274 patients who applied between January 2011 and December 2022 and underwent left ventricular assist devices implantation with end-stage heart failure. RESULTS: Fifty (74.6%) patients with left ventricular assist devices admitted to the hospital for non-cardiac surgery were emergency interventions. The most common reasons for admission were general surgery (52.2%), driveline wound revision (22.3%), and neurological surgery (14.9%). This patient group has the highest in-hospital mortality rate (12.8%) and the highest rate of neurological surgery (8.7%). While 70% of the patients who underwent neurosurgery were taken to surgery urgently, the International Normalized Ratio values of these patients were between 3.5 and 4.5 at the time of admission to the emergency department. CONCLUSION: With a perioperative multidisciplinary approach, higher morbidity and mortality risks can be reduced during emergencies and major surgical procedures.