Trans-retro-peritoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for posterior hilar tumor: technical feasibility and preliminary results.

Background: Urologists still encounter challenges when it comes to the surgical management of tumors located on the posterior lip and posterior renal hilar region. We propose a trans-retro-peritoneal (TRP) technique to address the difficulties associated with posterior hilar tumors during retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Its efficacy was evaluated in a retrospective case-control study. Methods: The patients with posterior hilar tumors (≤7 cm) that underwent retroperitoneal LPN were included. The TRP technique allowed the posterior hilar tumor completely visible by incising the ventral peritoneum and rotating kidney ventrally during retroperitoneal LPN, which was applied in 36 cases, while the conventional retroperitoneal LPN was performed in 22 cases. Perioperative data were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of TRP-LPN. Results: In TRP-LPN group, the TRP technique was successfully performed in all the patients without converting to open surgery or radical nephrectomy. The warm ischemia time was significantly shorter in TRP-LPN group than conventional LPN group (20.3 vs. 28.5 min, P<0.001). Furthermore, the mean estimated blood loss in TRR-LPN group was significantly less than that in conventional LPN group (86.5 vs. 90.9 mL, P<0.05). The mean operation time and recovery time of gastrointestinal function were similar between two groups. No severe complications occurred, and no positive surgical margin was found. The rate of Trifecta achievement was 50.0% (18/36) and 31.8% (7/22) respectively for TRP-LPN and conventional LPN (P=0.175). After mean follow-up of 21 months, no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all cases. Conclusions: Our findings, as demonstrated by the Trifecta outcomes, support the feasibility and efficacy of TRP-LPN in managing posterior renal hilar tumors. This approach may be considered as an efficient option for surgical management of such tumors.

Combination of holographic imaging with robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumor treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical value of the holographic imaging technology in combination with robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal hilar tumor treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From Dec. 2018 to Dec. 2021, patients diagnosed with renal hilar tumor were included in this retrospective study. Before the surgery, the engineers established the holographic image models based on the enhanced CT data. The models were used in patient consultation, pre-surgery planning and surgery simulation. During the RAPN, the navigation was achieved by real-time overlapping of the holographic images on the robotic surgery endoscopic views. The navigation technique helped the surgeon to identify the important anatomic structures such as tumor, renal vein, renal artery, and pelvis. RESULTS: There were total of eight patients with renal hilar tumor who underwent RAPN combined with holographic imaging technique. The mean age was 57.3 years, the median ASA score was 2. The mean tumor size was 42.4 mm and the median RENAL Nephrometry score was 9.5. The clinical stages were cT1a (37.5%) and cT1b (62.5%). All the procedures were performed uneventfully by one surgeon. The mean operative time was 144.3 min, and the mean warm ischemia time was 27.9 min. The mean estimated blood loss was 86.3 ml. There was no conversion to open surgery or radical nephrectomy. There were no Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Using the holographic imaging technique, the pre-surgery planning, simulation of renal arterial clamp and excision of the tumor, and intraoperative navigation were feasible and helpful in facilitating RAPN.

Comparison of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Hilar Tumors: Results from a Tertiary Referral Center.

Objective: To compare perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal hilar tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors at our institution between January 2014 and August 2018. The entire cohort was divided into two groups according to surgical approach: RAPN and LPN group. Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of the two groups were collected and compared. Results: A total of 116 patients with renal hilar tumors were identified, including 52 patients who underwent RAPN and 64 patients who underwent LPN, respectively. Demographic baseline characteristics were similar in two groups. There were no differences between the RAPN and LPN groups for operative time, transfusion rate, conversion rate, surgical margin, perioperative complication, and hospital stay. Compared with the LPN group, the RAPN group was associated with significant less estimated blood loss (100 vs 150 mL; p < 0.001), shorter warm ischemia time (20.3 vs 24.5 minutes; p = 0.001), and higher direct cost (p < 0.001). Percentage of estimated glomerular filtration rate change at 6 months after surgery was lower in RAPN group than LPN group (10.4% vs 15.2%; p = 0.020). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of oncologic outcomes. Conclusions: For hilar tumors, both RAPN and LPN were safe and feasible surgical treatments. RAPN might be associated with superior perioperative outcomes (less estimated blood loss and shorter warm ischemia time) and better postoperative renal functional preservation. RAPN might be the preferred option when condition permits for renal hilar tumors.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy-related surgical techniques. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1-cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115-390] vs. 190 [110-390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12-60] vs. 27 [17-41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3-16] vs. 7.5 [4-18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4-144] vs. 101.3 [64.2-134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2 , p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43-169] vs. 78.5 [50-281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50-1500] vs. 200 [20-1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow-up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5-year recurrence-free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640). CONCLUSIONS: For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors.

Fissureless trans-pericardial left upper lobectomy of the lung: a technique to avoid pneumonectomy.

Fissureless lobectomy of the lung is an operative technique in which hilar vessels and bronchus are divided before the interlobar fissure is separated. When hilar vessels and bronchus cannot be exposed because of tumor progression, this procedure cannot be used. As an alternative, we propose here trans-pericardial fissureless left upper lobectomy, in which the left upper bronchus is exposed by dividing the posterior wall of the pericardium after the left upper pulmonary vein is divided in the pericardial cavity. This technique enables us to perform fissureless left upper lobectomy even when hilar vessels cannot be accessed outside the pericardium.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumor: A prospective multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether robot-assisted partial nephrectomy compared with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is effective for renal hilar tumor removal. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label trial with a 2-year enrollment period. A total of 22 academic hospitals in Japan participated in the present study. Comparison with historical control values from reported studies of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was carried out. The warm ischemia time and positive surgical margin rate were set as primary perioperative and oncological outcomes. In the historical control group, these were 27.7 min and 13%, respectively. RESULTS: The analysis population included 105 participants. The mean warm ischemia time was 20.2 (95% confidence interval 16.7-21.8; P < 0.0001 vs 27.7). Two of 103 participants (1.9%) had a positive surgical margin (95% confidence interval 0.5-6.8%). Both results satisfy the prespecified decision criteria for the superiority of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy over the historical control of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Resected weight and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate were predictive factors of functional loss of the partially nephrectomized kidney after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal hilar tumors results in shorter warm ischemia time than and comparable positive surgical margin rate to those reported for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Kidney ventrally rotation technique in retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior hilar tumor: technical feasibility and preliminary results.

PURPOSE: The retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is suitable for tumors locating on the posterior side of the kidney. However, the posterior hilar tumor poses an additional surgical challenge due to the special location and poor tumor exposure. We developed a novel kidney ventrally rotation technique to overcome this difficulty during retroperitoneal RAPN and evaluated its efficacy in a retrospective case-control comparative study. METHODS: From March 2016 to April 2019, a total of 39 patients with posterior renal hilar tumor underwent retroperitoneal RAPN. The kidney ventrally rotation technique, which improved the tumor exposure by opening the peritoneum and rotating the kidney ventrally, was applied in 24 cases, and the conventional RAPN was performed in the other 15 cases (control group). Perioperative data was analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of the kidney ventrally rotation technique. RESULTS: In kidney rotation group, the 24 patients underwent RAPN successfully without converting to open surgery or radical nephrectomy. The warm ischemia time was 17.4 ± 6.6 min, which was significantly shorter than 24.5 ± 8.3 min in control group. The mean operation time (80 ± 24 min) and estimated blood loss (104 ± 65 ml) were not different from the control group. No sever complications occurred, and no positive surgical margin was found in all the malignant cases. After 14 months follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all cases. CONCLUSION: Kidney ventrally rotation technique is safe and feasible for improving the exposure of posterior renal hilar tumor during retroperitoneal RAPN. It could be regarded as an efficient option for the management of posterior hilar tumor.

Navigation of Intelligent/Interactive Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technique in Laparoscopic or Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Hilar Tumors.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the navigation of intelligent/interactive qualitative and quantitative analysis (IQQA) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technique in laparoscopic or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (LPN or RAPN) for renal hilar tumors. Patients and Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with hilar tumors from February 2016 to February 2018. IQQA 3D reconstruction technique was applied for the purpose of navigation and resection of the tumors. Relevant clinical parameters and surgical outcomes were recorded. Results: All 26 LPN or RAPN were effectively completed without conversion to a hand-assisted or an open approach. Under the navigation of IQQA, all tumors were found precisely at the first time during surgeries. The mean operative time was 142 minutes (142 ± 35), with a mean warm ischemia time of 24.3 minutes (24.3 ± 9.5). The estimated blood loss was 156 mL (156 ± 112). No intraoperative complications occurred. Two patients suffered from postoperative complications. All patients had negative margins on the final pathological examination. At a mean follow-up period of 3 months, the mean glomerular filtration rate is 22.5 mL/min (22.5 ± 7.1) without tumor recurrence. Conclusions: With peculiar features, such as accurate location, complete resection, and fewer perioperative complications, the navigation of IQQA 3D reconstruction technique in partial nephrectomy represents a safe and effective procedure for hilar tumors.

Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei in horseshoe kidney masquerading as renal hilar tumor: a case report.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei, a rare condition consisting of intraperitoneal mucinous tumors and ascites, most commonly arises from mucinous tumors of the appendix. Very rarely, mucinous deposits arise in the retroperitoneum without intraperitoneal involvement. This has been termed pseudomyxoma extraperitonei. It is a rare and poorly understood condition that is heterogeneous in its clinical behavior, and only a few cases presenting as localized disease in the retroperitoneum have been reported. In this paper, we report the first case of pseudomyxoma extraperitonei presenting as a simple renal hilar mass and mimicking a tumor of renal origin in a horseshoe-kidney patient. The patient underwent isthmusectomy and nephrectomy. Immunohistochemical staining suggested appendiceal origin. She remained alive without adjuvant therapy postoperatively, and no evidence of recurrence was present for 25 months.

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To present our single-center experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for T1 renal hilar tumors and evaluate which one is better. METHODS: A retrospective review of 63 patients with hilar tumors undergoing retroperitoneal LPN or LRN was performed. The perioperative characteristics, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to month 3, and oncologic outcomes were summarized. RESULTS: In total, 25 patients underwent LPN, and 38 patients underwent LRN. The mean tumor size in the LPN and LRN groups was 4.5 and 4.9 cm, respectively. The mean operation time was longer in the LPN group than that in the LRN group (212.5 minutes versus 160.7 minutes, respectively; P < .05). Patients undergoing the LPN had a longer median length of hospital stay after surgery (9 days versus 7 days, P < .05). Four percent of patients in the LPN group experienced postoperative complications compared with 5% of patients in the LRN group, which was not significantly different. Compared with preoperative eGFR, postoperative eGFR at 3 months decreased by 15.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 27.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the LPN and the LRN groups, respectively (P < .05). There was one local recurrence in the LPN group and three local or distant recurrences in the LRN group (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, although retroperitoneal LRN can result in shorter operation times and shorter lengths of stay, retroperitoneal LPN can preserve renal function better than LRN. Retroperitoneal LPN should be the priority in selected patients with T1 renal hilar tumors, especially for patients with renal insufficiency.

Multicenter study of endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: E-POD hilar study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) is often recommended in preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), but endoscopic biliary stent (EBS) is also used in the clinical practice. We conducted this large-scale multicenter study to compare ENBD and EBS in this setting. METHODS: A total of 374 cases undergoing PBD including 281 ENBD and 76 EBS for hilar MBO in 29 centers were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) accounted for 69.8% and Bismuth-Corlette classification was III or more in 58.8% of the study population. Endoscopic PBD was technically successful in 94.6%, and adverse event rate was 21.9%. The rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis was 16.0%, and non-endoscopic sphincterotomy was the only risk factor (odds ratio [OR] 2.51). Preoperative re-intervention was performed in 61.5%: planned re-interventions in 48.4% and unplanned re-interventions in 31.0%. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was placed in 6.4% at the time of surgery. The risk factors for unplanned procedures were ECC (OR 2.64) and total bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL (OR 2.18). In surgically resected cases, prognostic factors were ECC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57), predraiange magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (HR 1.62) and unplanned re-interventions (HR 1.81). EBS was not associated with increased adverse events, unplanned re-interventions, or a poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis did not demonstrate the advantage of ENBD over EBS as the initial PBD for resectable hilar MBO. Although the technical success rate of endoscopic PBD was high, its re-intervention rate was not negligible, and unplanned re-intervention was associated with a poor prognosis in resected hilar MBO.

Percutaneous biliary approach as a successful rescue procedure after failed endoscopic therapy for drainage in advanced hilar tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Palliative endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage is used for unresectable advanced hilar cancer (HC). The best option for drainage in Bismuth type III or IV HC has not been established. The aims of this study are to identify factors predictive of endoscopic stenting failure and evaluate the effectiveness of rescue percutaneous stenting in patients with advanced HC. METHODS: Data from 110 patients with inoperable advanced HC were retrospectively reviewed. All received bilateral self-expandable metallic stents. Patients were divided into three groups: I, successful initial endoscopic stenting; II, unsuccessful initial endoscopic stenting, followed by percutaneous stenting; and III, initial percutaneous stenting. We analyzed clinical results and radiologic tumor characteristics. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of all groups were similar, except the hospital stay was longer in group III than group I. Technical success rate was higher in groups II and III (100%) than in group I (72.4%). The functional success rate, stent patency time, patient survival time, and complication rate were similar between groups. Endoscopic stenting failed because of guide-wire passage failure (n = 12) or stent passage failure (n = 7). The only factor significantly associated with endoscopic failure was a smaller left intrahepatic duct-common bile duct angle. CONCLUSIONS: As clinical outcomes were generally similar between approaches, percutaneous stenting is recommended for patients with Bismuth type III or IV advanced HC. Acute left intrahepatic duct-common bile duct angulation predicts endoscopic stenting failure. If endoscopic stenting fails, immediate conversion to the percutaneous approach is a necessary and effective rescue method.

Retroperitoneoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Moderately Complex Ventral Hilar Tumors: Surgical Technique and Trifecta Outcomes from a Single Institution in China.

OBJECTIVES: T1 ventral renal hilar tumors (VRHTs) represent a very special type of tumor, for which laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) by the retroperitoneal approach is challenging. In this study, we report our surgical technique and Trifecta results. METHODS: Renal rotation technique has been established for retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) for VRHTs in our institution. Trifecta was used as a composite outcome measure for assessing quality of PLPN using this technique. A retrospective analysis of RLPN cases in 12 patients with VRHTs was performed. RESULTS: Mean tumor size was 3.4 cm and median R.E.N.A.L. score was 8 (range 7-9). Mean warm ischemia time was 23.1 minutes, suture time 28.1 minutes, estimated blood loss 139.2 mL, operation time 122.8 minutes, and median hospital stay was 4 days. Three patients (25.0%) had Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications. Seven patients (58.3%) achieved Trifecta. Postoperative pathological examination showed renal cell carcinoma in all cases with negative surgical margin. A median follow-up of 7 months revealed no local recurrence or distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Our Trifecta outcomes demonstrate that RLPN with renal rotation technique is feasible, safe, and effective for moderately complex VRHTs. The short-term functional and oncologic outcomes are promising; however, long-term follow-up is needed.

Functional and oncological outcomes of open nephron-sparing surgery for complex renal masses.

OBJECTIVE: To present our long-term functional and oncological outcomes in open nephron-sparing surgery for complex renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 584 patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy between January 1995 and May 2014 at our institution; 108 (18.4%) patients had hilar or completely intraparenchymal tumors or both. We compared change in renal function, perioperative complications, and survival outcomes between complex and noncomplex renal masses. RESULTS: Mean tumor diameter was 4.3 and 3.5cm in patients with hilar and completely intraparenchymal lesions, respectively. R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores were significantly higher in patients with complex tumors as compared with patients with exophytic tumors. There was no significant difference between mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at last follow-up compared with preoperative mean estimated glomerular filtration rate in any of the groups. The incidence of perioperative complications was similar across all patients groups. Estimated 10-year cancer-specific survival probabilities were 100% in patients with hilar and intraparenchymal tumors. The 10-year recurrence-free survival probabilities were 96% and 95% in patients with hilar and intraparenchymal tumors, respectively. The main limitations include retrospective design and the lack of kidney-specific functional scan. CONCLUSION: Open nephron-sparing surgery should be considered for complex renal masses yielding excellent functional and oncological outcomes without higher incidence of complications.