Infratentorial brain injury and death by neurologic criteria in Canada: a narrative review.

There are two anatomic formulations of death by neurologic criteria accepted worldwide: whole-brain death and brainstem death. As part of the Canadian Death Definition and Determination Project, we convened an expert working group and performed a narrative review of the literature. Infratentorial brain injury (IBI) with an unconfounded clinical assessment consistent with death by neurologic criteria represents a nonrecoverable injury. The clinical determination of death cannot distinguish between IBI and whole-brain cessation of function. Current clinical, functional, and neuroimaging assessments cannot reliably confirm the complete and permanent destruction of the brainstem. No patient with isolated brainstem death has been reported to recover consciousness and all patients have died. Studies suggest a significant majority of isolated brainstem death will evolve into whole-brain death, influenced by time/duration of somatic support and impacted by ventricular drainage and/or posterior fossa decompressive craniectomy. Acknowledging variability in intensive care unit (ICU) physician opinion on this matter, a majority of Canadian ICU physicians would perform ancillary testing for death determination by neurologic criteria in the context of IBI. There is currently no reliable ancillary test to confirm complete destruction of the brainstem; ancillary testing currently includes evaluation of both infratentorial and supratentorial flow. Acknowledging international variability in this regard, the existing evidence reviewed does not provide sufficient confidence that the clinical exam in IBI represents a complete and permanent destruction of the reticular activating system and thus the capacity for consciousness. On this basis, IBI consistent with clinical signs of death by neurologic criteria without significant supratentorial involvement does not fulfill criteria for death in Canada and ancillary testing is required.

RéSUMé: Il existe deux formulations anatomiques du décès selon des critères neurologiques acceptés dans le monde entier : la mort du cerveau entier et la mort du tronc cérébral. Dans le cadre du Projet canadien de définition et de détermination du décès, nous avons réuni un groupe de travail composé d'experts et réalisé un compte rendu narratif de la littérature. Une lésion cérébrale infratentorielle (LCI) avec une évaluation clinique sans facteur confondant et compatible avec un décès selon des critères neurologiques représente une atteinte irrécupérable. La détermination clinique du décès ne permet pas de faire la distinction entre une LCI et l'arrêt de la fonction dans le cerveau entier. Les évaluations cliniques, fonctionnelles et de neuroimagerie actuelles ne peuvent pas confirmer de manière fiable la destruction complète et permanente du tronc cérébral. La récupération de la conscience n'a jamais été signalée chez aucun patient présentant une mort isolée du tronc cérébral, et tous les patients sont décédés. Des études suggèrent qu'une majorité significative des morts isolées du tronc cérébral évolueront vers la mort cérébrale entière, étant influencées par le temps et la durée de l'assistance somatique et impactées par le drainage ventriculaire et/ou la craniectomie décompressive de la fosse postérieure. Compte tenu de la variabilité des opinions des médecins intensivistes à ce sujet, la majorité des médecins intensivistes canadiens réaliseraient des examens auxiliaires pour déterminer le décès selon des critères neurologiques dans le contexte d'une LCI. Il n'existe actuellement aucun examen auxiliaire fiable pour confirmer la destruction complète du tronc cérébral; les examens auxiliaires comprennent actuellement l'évaluation de la circulation infratentorielle et supratentorielle. Reconnaissant la variabilité internationale à cet égard, les données probantes existantes passées en revue ne sont pas suffisamment fiables pour affirmer que l'examen clinique en cas de LCI représente une destruction complète et permanente du système d'activation réticulaire et donc de la capacité de conscience. En se fondant sur cette base, une LCI compatible avec les signes cliniques d'un décès selon des critères neurologiques sans atteinte supratentorielle significative ne répond pas aux critères de décès au Canada et un examen auxiliaire est requis.

Perioperative Risk Factors Associated with Unplanned Neurological Intensive Care Unit Events Following Elective Infratentorial Brain Tumor Resection.

BACKGROUND: Our aim of this study was to identify risk factors and develop a prediction model for unplanned neurological intensive care unit (NICU) events after elective infratentorial brain tumor resection in order to propose an individualized admission to the NICU tailored to patient needs. METHODS: Patients admitted to our NICU between September 2018 and May 2021 after elective infratentorial brain tumor resection were reviewed. Prolonged NICU stays and unplanned NICU admissions were defined as unplanned NICU events. The prognostic model of unplanned NICU events was developed using a forward stepwise logistic regression analysis, and external validation was evaluated. The C-statistic was used to assess discrimination, and a smooth, nonparametric calibration line was used to assess calibration graphically in the model. RESULTS: Of the 1,710 patients in the development cohort, unplanned NICU events occurred in 162 (9.5%). Based on the lesion type, a Karnofsky Performance Status score <70 at admission, longer duration of surgery, bleeding in the operative area evident on postoperative computed tomography, higher fibrinogen and blood glucose levels at admission, and more intraoperative blood loss were independently associated with unplanned NICU events. The external validation test showed good discrimination (C-statistic = 0.811) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.141) for unplanned NICU events. CONCLUSIONS: Several patient and operative characteristics are associated with a greater likelihood of the occurrence of unplanned NICU events. In the future, we may be able to provide better help for the resource allocation of NICUs according to these risk factors and prediction models.

Brainstem and cerebellar volumes at magnetic resonance imaging are smaller in fetuses with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease is associated with an increased risk of smaller brain volumes and structural brain damage, and impaired growth of supratentorial brain structures in utero has been linked to poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, little is known on brainstem and cerebellar volumes in fetuses with congenital heart disease. Moreover, it is not clear whether impaired infratentorial growth, if present, is associated with only certain types of fetal cardiac defects or with supratentorial brain growth, and whether altered biometry is already present before the third trimester. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate brainstem and cerebellar volumes in fetuses with congenital heart disease and to compare them to infratentorial brain volumes in fetuses with normal hearts. Secondarily, the study aimed to identify associations between infratentorial brain biometry and the type of cardiac defects, supratentorial brain volumes, and gestational age. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective case-control study, 141 magnetic resonance imaging studies of 135 fetuses with congenital heart disease and 141 magnetic resonance imaging studies of 125 controls with normal hearts at 20 to 37 gestational weeks (median, 25 weeks) were evaluated. All cases and controls had normal birthweight and no evidence of structural brain disease or genetic syndrome. Six types of congenital heart disease were included: tetralogy of Fallot (n=32); double-outlet right ventricle (n=22); transposition of the great arteries (n=27); aortic obstruction (n=24); hypoplastic left heart syndrome (n=22); and hypoplastic right heart syndrome (n=14). First, brainstem and cerebellar volumes of each fetus were segmented and compared between cases and controls. In addition, transverse cerebellar diameters, vermian areas, and supratentorial brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes were quantified and differences assessed between cases and controls. Volumetric differences were further analyzed according to types of cardiac defects and supratentorial brain volumes. Finally, volume ratios were created for each brain structure ([volume in fetus with congenital heart disease/respective volume in control fetus] × 100) and correlated to gestational age. RESULTS: Brainstem (cases, 2.1 cm3 vs controls, 2.4 cm3; P<.001) and cerebellar (cases, 3.2 cm3 vs controls, 3.4 cm3; P<.001) volumes were smaller in fetuses with congenital heart disease than in controls, whereas transverse cerebellar diameters (P=.681) and vermian areas (P=.947) did not differ between groups. Brainstem and cerebellar volumes differed between types of cardiac defects. Overall, the volume ratio of cases to controls was 80.8% for the brainstem, 90.5% for the cerebellum, and 90.1% for the supratentorial brain. Fetuses with tetralogy of Fallot and transposition of the great arteries were most severely affected by total brain volume reduction. Gestational age had no effect on volume ratios. CONCLUSION: The volume of the infratentorial brain, which contains structures considered crucial to brain function, is significantly smaller in fetuses with congenital heart disease than in controls from midgestation onward. These findings suggest that impaired growth of both supra- and infratentorial brain structures in fetuses with congenital heart disease occurs in the second trimester. Further research is needed to elucidate associations between fetal brain volumes and neurodevelopmental outcomes in congenital heart disease.

When is "brainstem death" brain death? The case for ancillary testing in primary infratentorial brain lesion.

The widely accepted concept of brain death (BD) comprises the demonstration of irreversible coma in combination with the loss of brainstem reflexes and irreversible apnea. In some countries the combined clinical finding of coma, apnea, and loss of all tested brainstem reflexes ("brainstem death") is sufficient for diagnosing BD irrespective of the primary location of brain lesion. The present article aims to substantiate the need for ancillary testing in patients with primary infratentorial brain lesions. Anatomically, the "brainstem-death" syndrome can theoretically occur without relevant lesion of the mesopontine tegmental reticular formation (MPT-RF). Thus, a brainstem lesion may cause an apneic total locked-in syndrome, a rare syndrome with preserved capability for consciousness, mimicking "brainstem death". Findings in animals and humans have shown that alpha- or alpha/theta- EEG patterns in case of isolated brainstem lesion indicate intactness of relevant parts of the MPT-RF. In such patients the presence of irreversible coma has to be doubted, and the potential capacity for some degree of consciousness cannot be excluded as long as the EEG activity persists. Consequently the demonstration of either ancillary finding, electro-cortical inactivity or, preferably, cerebral circulatory arrest, is mandatory for diagnosing BD in patients with a primary infratentorial brain lesion.

Optimal detection of infratentorial lesions with a combined dual-echo MRI sequence: "PT2".

BACKGROUND: The infratentorial compartment is cardinal for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis. T2-weighted (T2) and proton density-weighted (PD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can visualize infratentorial lesions, but only suboptimally. OBJECTIVE: To combine PD and T2 for better lesion assessment. METHODS: T2 and PD from 35 cases were averaged to form "PT2" images. Two raters counted infratentorial lesions and qualitatively assessed their conspicuity. RESULTS: PT2 showed 244 infratentorial lesions, of which 94% and 74% were seen in PD and T2. PT2 received higher grades for image quality and lesion conspicuity (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: PT2 could improve our ability to diagnose and monitor MS.