Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Nodular Bronchiectatic-Type Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease.

We investigated the treatment outcomes of patients with cavitary nodular bronchiectatic (C-NB)-type Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease (PD) via outcome comparisons between the fibrocavitary (FC) and C-NB types treated with guideline-based therapy (GBT) composed of daily three-drug oral antibiotics and injectable aminoglycoside. Additionally, we analyzed whether treatment with oral antibiotics alone would result in acceptable outcomes for the C-NB type. From 2002 to 2019, patients with cavitary MAC-PD who received three-drug oral antibiotics with or without an injectable aminoglycoside for ≥1 year were retrospectively enrolled at a tertiary referral center in South Korea. We compared the rates of culture conversion at 12 months according to the radiological type and treatment regimen. The overall culture conversion rate at 12 months of 154 patients with cavitary MAC-PD who received GBT was 75.3%. Among them, the culture conversion rates of 114 patients with the C-NB type were higher than that of 40 patients with the FC-type (80.7% versus 60.0%, respectively; P = 0.009). Of 166 patients with the C-NB-type treated with oral medications with or without an injectable drug, 83.7% achieved culture conversion at 12 months. The conversion rates of those who received oral medications alone and those treated with oral medications and an injectable aminoglycoside were similar (90.4% versus 80.7%, respectively; P = 0.117). In conclusion, the culture conversion rates of the patients with C-NB type treated with GBT were significantly higher than those of patients with the FC type. Additionally, the C-NB type could be treated with oral medications alone.

Mycobactericidal Effects of Different Regimens Measured by Molecular Bacterial Load Assay among People Treated for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Tanzania.

Rifampin or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) treatment has largely transitioned to regimens free of the injectable aminoglycoside component, despite the drug class' purported bactericidal activity early in treatment. We tested whether Mycobacterium tuberculosis killing rates measured by tuberculosis molecular bacterial load assay (TB-MBLA) in sputa correlate with composition of the RR/MDR-TB regimen. Serial sputa were collected from patients with RR/MDR- and drug-sensitive TB at days 0, 3, 7, and 14, and then monthly for 4 months of anti-TB treatment. TB-MBLA was used to quantify viable M. tuberculosis 16S rRNA in sputum for estimation of colony forming units per ml (eCFU/ml). M. tuberculosis killing rates were compared among regimens using nonlinear-mixed-effects modeling of repeated measures. Thirty-seven patients produced 296 serial sputa and received treatment as follows: 13 patients received an injectable bedaquiline-free reference regimen, 9 received an injectable bedaquiline-containing regimen, 8 received an all-oral bedaquiline-based regimen, and 7 patients were treated for drug-sensitive TB with conventional rifampin/isoniazid/pyrazinamide/ethambutol (RHZE). Compared to the adjusted M. tuberculosis killing of -0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.23 to -0.12) for the injectable bedaquiline-free reference regimen, the killing rates were -0.62 (95% CI -1.05 to -0.20) log10 eCFU/ml for the injectable bedaquiline-containing regimen (P = 0.019), -0.35 (95% CI -0.65 to -0.13) log10 eCFU/ml for the all-oral bedaquiline-based regimen (P = 0.054), and -0.29 (95% CI -0.78 to +0.22) log10 eCFU/ml for the RHZE regimen (P = 0.332). Thus, M. tuberculosis killing rates from sputa were higher among patients who received bedaquiline but were further improved with the addition of an injectable aminoglycoside.