Musicians have an advantage on a spatial-hearing task only when they are highly trained, start training early, and continue to play.

Musicians perform better than non-musicians on a variety of non-musical sound-perception tasks. Whether that musicians' advantage extends to spatial hearing is a topic of increasing interest. Here we investigated one facet of that topic by assessing musicians' and non-musicians' sensitivity to the two primary cues to sound-source location on the horizontal plane: interaural-level-differences (ILDs) and interaural-time-differences (ITDs). Specifically, we measured discrimination thresholds for ILDs at 4 kHz (n =246) and ITDs at 0.5 kHz (n = 137) in participants whose musical-training histories covered a wide range of lengths, onsets, and offsets. For ILD discrimination, when only musical-training length was considered in the analysis, no musicians' advantage was apparent. However, when thresholds were compared between subgroups of non-musicians (<2 years of training) and extreme musicians (≥10 years of training, started ≤ age 7, still playing) a musicians' advantage emerged. Threshold comparisons between the extreme musicians and other subgroups of highly trained musicians (≥10 years of training) further indicated that the advantage required both starting young and continuing to play. In addition, the advantage was larger in males than in females, by some measures, and was not evident in an assessment of learning. For ITD discrimination, in contrast to ILD discrimination, parallel analyses revealed no apparent musicians' advantage. The results suggest that musicianship is associated with greater sensitivity to ILDs, a fundamental sound-localization cue, even though that sensitivity is not central to music, that this musicians' advantage arises, at least in part, from nurture, and that it is governed by a neural substrate where ILDs are processed separately from, and more malleably than, ITDs.

The Neural Representation of Binaural Sound Localization Cues Across Different Subregions of the Chicken's Inferior Colliculus.

The sound localization behavior of the nocturnally hunting barn owl and its underlying neural computations is a textbook example of neuroethology. Differences in sound timing and level at the two ears are integrated in a series of well-characterized steps, from brainstem to inferior colliculus (IC), resulting in a topographical neural representation of auditory space. It remains an important question of brain evolution: How is this specialized case derived from a more plesiomorphic pattern? The present study is the first to match physiology and anatomical subregions in the non-owl avian IC. Single-unit responses in the chicken IC were tested for selectivity to different frequencies and to the binaural difference cues. Their anatomical origin was reconstructed with the help of electrolytic lesions and immunohistochemical identification of different subregions of the IC, based on previous characterizations in owl and chicken. In contrast to barn owl, there was no distinct differentiation of responses in the different subregions. We found neural topographies for both binaural cues but no evidence for a coherent representation of auditory space. The results are consistent with previous work in pigeon IC and chicken higher-order midbrain and suggest a plesiomorphic condition of multisensory integration in the midbrain that is dominated by lateral panoramic vision.

Head-related transfer functions of rabbits within the front horizontal plane.

The head-related transfer function (HRTF) describes the direction-dependent acoustic filtering by the head that occurs between a source signal in free-field space and the signal at the tympanic membrane. HRTFs contain information on sound source location via interaural differences of their magnitude or phase spectra and via the shapes of their magnitude spectra. The present study characterized HRTFs for source locations in the front horizontal plane for nine rabbits, which are a species commonly used in studies of the central auditory system. HRTF magnitude spectra shared several features across individuals, including a broad spectral peak at 2.6kHz that increased gain by 12 to 23dB depending on source azimuth; and a notch at 7.6kHz and peak at 9.8kHz visible for most azimuths. Overall, frequencies above 4kHz were amplified for sources ipsilateral to the ear and progressively attenuated for frontal and contralateral azimuths. The slope of the magnitude spectrum between 3 and 5kHz was found to be an unambiguous monaural cue for source azimuths ipsilateral to the ear. Average interaural level difference (ILD) between 5 and 16kHz varied monotonically with azimuth over ±31dB despite a relatively small head size. Interaural time differences (ITDs) at 0.5kHz and 1.5kHz also varied monotonically with azimuth over ±358 µs and ±260 µs, respectively. Remeasurement of HRTFs after pinna removal revealed that the large pinnae of rabbits were responsible for all spectral peaks and notches in magnitude spectra and were the main contribution to high-frequency ILDs (5-16kHz), whereas the rest of the head was the main contribution to ITDs and low-frequency ILDs (0.2-1.5kHz). Lastly, inter-individual differences in magnitude spectra were found to be small enough that deviations of individual HRTFs from an average HRTF were comparable in size to measurement error. Therefore, the average HRTF may be acceptable for use in neural or behavioral studies of rabbits implementing virtual acoustic space when measurement of individualized HRTFs is not possible.

Auditory Spatial Discrimination and Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided with a Cochlear Implant.

INTRODUCTION: Spatial hearing is most accurate using both ears, but accuracy decreases in persons with asymmetrical hearing between ears. In participants with deafness in one ear but normal hearing in the other ear (single-sided deafness [SSD]), this difference can be compensated by a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). It has been shown that a CI can restore sound localization performance, but it is still unclear to what extent auditory spatial discrimination can be improved. METHODS: The present study investigated auditory spatial discrimination using minimum audible angles (MAAs) in 18 CI-SSD participants. Results were compared to 120 age-matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) noise bursts were presented from 4°, 30°, and 60° azimuth on the CI side and on the NH side. MAA thresholds were tested for correlation with localization performance in the same participants. RESULTS: There were eight good performers and ten poor performers. There were more poor performers for LF signals than for HF signals. Performance on the CI side was comparable to performance on the NH side. Most difficulties occurred at 4° and at 30°. Eight of the good performers in the localization task were also good performers in the MAA task. Only the localization ability at 4° on the CI side was positively correlated with the MAA at that location. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a CI can restore localization ability but not necessarily auditory spatial discrimination at the same time. The ability to discriminate between adjacent locations may be trainable during rehabilitation to enhance important auditory skills.

Age differences in binaural and working memory abilities in school-going children.

OBJECTIVES: Binaural hearing is the interplay of acoustic cues (interaural time differences: ITD, interaural level differences: ILD, and spectral cues) and cognitive abilities (e.g., working memory, attention). The current study investigated the effect of developmental age on auditory binaural resolution and working memory and the association between them (if any) in school-going children. METHODS: Fifty-seven normal-hearing school-going children aged 6-15 y were recruited for the study. The participants were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n=17, Mage = 7.1y ± 0.72 y), Group 2 (n = 23; Mage = 10.2y ± 0.8 y), Group 3 (n = 17; Mage: 14.1 y ±1.3 y). Group 4, with normal hearing young adults (n = 20; Mage = 21.1 y± 3.2 y), was included for comparing the maturational changes in former groups with adult values. Tests of binaural resolution (ITD and ILD thresholds) and auditory working memory (forward and backward digit span and 2n-back digit) were administered to all the participants. RESULTS: Results indicated a main effect of age on spatial resolution and working memory, with the median of lower age groups (Group 1 & Group 2) being significantly poorer (p < 0.01) than the higher age groups (Group 3 & Group 4). Groups 2, 3, and 4 performed significantly better than Group 1 (p < 0.001) on the forward span and ILD task. Groups 3 and 4 had significantly better ITD (p = 0.04), backward span (p = 0.02), and 2n-back scores than Group 2. A significant correlation between scores on working memory tasks and spatial resolution thresholds was also found. On discriminant function analysis, backward span and ITD emerged as sensitive measures for segregating older groups (Group 3 & Group 4) from younger groups (Group 1 & Group 2). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that the ILD thresholds and forward digit span mature by nine years. However, the backward digit span score continued to mature beyond 15 y. This finding can be attributed to the influence of auditory attention (a working memory process) on the binaural resolution, which is reported to mature till late adolescence.

How to define thresholds for level and interaural-level-difference discrimination: Insights from scedasticities and distributions.

Sensitivity to changes in the stimulus level at one or at both ears and to changes in the interaural level difference (ILD) between the two ears has been studied widely. Several different definitions of threshold and, for one of them, two different ways of averaging single-listener thresholds have been used (i.e., arithmetically and geometrically), but it is unclear which definition and which way of averaging is most suitable. Here, we addressed this issue by examining which of the differently defined thresholds yielded the highest degree of homoscedasticity (homogeneity of the variance). We also examined how closely the differently defined thresholds followed the normal distribution. We measured thresholds from a large number of human listeners as a function of stimulus duration in six experimental conditions, using an adaptive two-alternative forced-choice paradigm. Thresholds defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the intensities or amplitudes of the target and the reference stimulus (i.e., as the difference in their levels or ILDs; the most commonly used definition) were clearly heteroscedastic. Log-transformation of these latter thresholds, as sometimes performed, did not result in homoscedasticity. Thresholds defined as the logarithm of the Weber fraction for stimulus intensity and thresholds defined as the logarithm of the Weber fraction for stimulus amplitude (the most rarely used definition) were consistent with homoscedasticity, but the latter were closer to the ideal case. Thresholds defined as the logarithm of the Weber fraction for stimulus amplitude also followed the normal distribution most closely. The discrimination thresholds should therefore be expressed as the logarithm of the Weber fraction for stimulus amplitude and be averaged arithmetically across listeners. Other implications are discussed, and the obtained differences between the thresholds in different conditions are compared to the literature.

Listen to the Brain-Auditory Sound Source Localization in Neuromorphic Computing Architectures.

Conventional processing of sensory input often relies on uniform sampling leading to redundant information and unnecessary resource consumption throughout the entire processing pipeline. Neuromorphic computing challenges these conventions by mimicking biology and employing distributed event-based hardware. Based on the task of lateral auditory sound source localization (SSL), we propose a generic approach to map biologically inspired neural networks to neuromorphic hardware. First, we model the neural mechanisms of SSL based on the interaural level difference (ILD). Afterward, we identify generic computational motifs within the model and transform them into spike-based components. A hardware-specific step then implements them on neuromorphic hardware. We exemplify our approach by mapping the neural SSL model onto two platforms, namely the IBM TrueNorth Neurosynaptic System and SpiNNaker. Both implementations have been tested on synthetic and real-world data in terms of neural tunings and readout characteristics. For synthetic stimuli, both implementations provide a perfect readout (100% accuracy). Preliminary real-world experiments yield accuracies of 78% (TrueNorth) and 13% (SpiNNaker), RMSEs of 41∘ and 39∘, and MAEs of 18∘ and 29∘, respectively. Overall, the proposed mapping approach allows for the successful implementation of the same SSL model on two different neuromorphic architectures paving the way toward more hardware-independent neural SSL.

Contextual Lateralization Based on Interaural Level Differences Is Preshaped by the Auditory Periphery and Predominantly Immune Against Sequential Segregation.

The perceived azimuth of a target sound is determined by the interaural time difference and the interaural level difference (ILD) and is subject to contextual effects from precursor sounds. This study characterized ILD-based precursor effects (PEs) for high-frequency stimuli in a total of seven normal-hearing listeners. In Experiment 1, precursor and target were band-pass-filtered noises approximately centered at 4 kHz (1.2- and 1-octave bandwidth, respectively) separated by a 10-ms gap. The effects of precursor location (ipsilateral, contralateral, and central) on the perceived target azimuth were measured using a head-pointing task. Relative to control trials without a precursor, ipsilateral precursors biased the perceived target azimuth toward midline (medial bias) and contralateral precursors biased it contralaterally (lateral bias). Central precursors caused a symmetric lateral bias. An auditory periphery model that determines the "internal" ILD at the auditory nerve level, including either realistic efferent compression control or auditory nerve adaptation, explained about 50% of the variance in the PEs. These within-trial PEs were accompanied by an across-trial PE, inducing medial bias. Experiment 2 studied the role of sequential segregation in the within-trial PE by introducing a pitch difference between precursor and target. Segregation conditions caused increased PE for ipsilateral, no effect for contralateral, and either no effect or reduced PE for central precursors. Overall, the ILD-based within-trial PE appears to be preshaped already in the auditory periphery and the mechanism underlying at least the ipsilateral PE appears to be immune against sequential segregation.

Impact of processing-latency induced interaural delay and level discrepancy on sensitivity to interaural level differences in cochlear implant users.

PURPOSE: This study investigated whether an interaural delay, e.g. caused by the processing latency of a hearing device, can affect sensitivity to interaural level differences (ILDs) in normal hearing subjects or cochlear implant (CI) users with contralateral normal hearing (SSD-CI). METHODS: Sensitivity to ILD was measured in 10 SSD-CI subjects and in 24 normal hearing subjects. The stimulus was a noise burst presented via headphones and via a direct cable connection (CI). ILD sensitivity was measured for different interaural delays in the range induced by hearing devices. ILD sensitivity was correlated with results obtained in a sound localization task using seven loudspeakers in the frontal horizontal plane. RESULTS: In the normal hearing subjects the sensitivity to interaural level differences deteriorated significantly with increasing interaural delays. In the CI group, no significant effect of interaural delays on ILD sensitivity was found. The NH subjects were significantly more sensitive to ILDs. The mean localization error in the CI group was 10.8° higher than in the normal hearing group. No correlation between sound localization ability and ILD sensitivity was found. CONCLUSION: Interaural delays influence the perception of ILDs. For normal hearing subjects a significant decrement in sensitivity to ILD was measured. The effect could not be confirmed in the tested SSD-CI group, probably due to a small subject group with large variations. The temporal matching of the two sides may be beneficial for ILD processing and thus sound localization for CI patients. However, further studies are needed for verification.

Hearing Asymmetry Biases Spatial Hearing in Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Users Despite Bilateral Low-Frequency Hearing Preservation.

Many cochlear implant users with binaural residual (acoustic) hearing benefit from combining electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) in the implanted ear with acoustic amplification in the other. These bimodal EAS listeners can potentially use low-frequency binaural cues to localize sounds. However, their hearing is generally asymmetric for mid- and high-frequency sounds, perturbing or even abolishing binaural cues. Here, we investigated the effect of a frequency-dependent binaural asymmetry in hearing thresholds on sound localization by seven bimodal EAS listeners. Frequency dependence was probed by presenting sounds with power in low-, mid-, high-, or mid-to-high-frequency bands. Frequency-dependent hearing asymmetry was present in the bimodal EAS listening condition (when using both devices) but was also induced by independently switching devices on or off. Using both devices, hearing was near symmetric for low frequencies, asymmetric for mid frequencies with better hearing thresholds in the implanted ear, and monaural for high frequencies with no hearing in the non-implanted ear. Results show that sound-localization performance was poor in general. Typically, localization was strongly biased toward the better hearing ear. We observed that hearing asymmetry was a good predictor for these biases. Notably, even when hearing was symmetric a preferential bias toward the ear using the hearing aid was revealed. We discuss how frequency dependence of any hearing asymmetry may lead to binaural cues that are spatially inconsistent as the spectrum of a sound changes. We speculate that this inconsistency may prevent accurate sound-localization even after long-term exposure to the hearing asymmetry.

Sound localisation of low- and high-frequency sounds in cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness.

OBJECTIVE: Localisation of low- and high-frequency sounds in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users was investigated using noise stimuli designed to mitigate monaural localisation cues. DESIGN: Within subject design. Sound source localisation was tested in the horizontal plane using an array of seven loudspeakers along the azimuthal angle span from -90° to +90°. Stimuli were broadband noise and high- and low-frequency noise. STUDY SAMPLE: Twelve adult subjects with single-sided deafness participated in the study. All had normal hearing in the healthy ear and were supplied with a cochlear implant (CI) in their deaf ear. RESULTS: With broadband noise, the mean angular localisation error was 39° in aided condition as compared to a median angular error of 83.6° when the speech processor was not worn. For high-frequency noise, the median angular error was 30° and for low-frequency noise, it was 46° in the CI-aided condition. CONCLUSIONS: Single-sided deaf CI users show the best sound localisation for high-frequency sounds. This supports the view that interaural level differences are dominant for sound localisation in these listeners. Nonetheless, a limited ability to localise low-frequency sounds was observed, which may be based on the supportive perception of interaural time differences.

Towards a Consensus on an ICF-Based Classification System for Horizontal Sound-Source Localization.

The study aimed to develop a consensus classification system for the reporting of sound localization testing results, especially in the field of cochlear implantation. Against the background of an overview of the wide variations present in localization testing procedures and reporting metrics, a novel classification system was proposed to report localization errors according to the widely accepted International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. The obtained HEARRING_LOC_ICF scale includes the ICF graded scale: 0 (no impairment), 1 (mild impairment), 2 (moderate impairment), 3 (severe impairment), and 4 (complete impairment). Improvement of comparability of localization results across institutes, localization testing setups, and listeners was demonstrated by applying the classification system retrospectively to data obtained from cohorts of normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners at our institutes. The application of our classification system will help to facilitate multi-center studies, as well as allowing better meta-analyses of data, resulting in improved evidence-based practice in the field.

Statistics of the instantaneous interaural parameters for dichotic tones in diotic noise (N0S ψ ).

Stimuli consisting of an interaurally phase-shifted tone in diotic noise-often referred to as N 0 S ψ -are commonly used to study binaural hearing. As a consequence of mixing diotic noise with a dichotic tone, this type of stimulus contains random fluctuations in both interaural phase- and level-difference. We report the joint probability density functions of the two interaural differences as a function of amplitude and interaural phase of the tone. Furthermore, a second joint probability density function for interaural phase differences and the instantaneous cross-power is derived. The closed-form expression can be used in future studies of binaural unmasking first to obtain the interaural statistics and then study more directly the relation between those statistics and binaural tone detection.

Binaural-cue Weighting and Training-Induced Reweighting Across Frequencies.

During sound lateralization, the information provided by interaural differences in time (ITD) and level (ILD) is weighted, with ITDs and ILDs dominating for low and high frequencies, respectively. For mid frequencies, the weighting between these binaural cues can be changed via training. The present study investigated whether binaural-cue weights change gradually with increasing frequency region, whether they can be changed in various frequency regions, and whether such binaural-cue reweighting generalizes to untrained frequencies. In two experiments, a total of 39 participants lateralized 500-ms, 1/3-octave-wide noise bursts containing various ITD/ILD combinations in a virtual audio-visual environment. Binaural-cue weights were measured before and after a 2-session training in which, depending on the group, either ITDs or ILDs were visually reinforced. In experiment 1, four frequency bands (centered at 1000, 1587, 2520, and 4000 Hz) and a multiband stimulus comprising all four bands were presented during weight measurements. During training, only the 1000-, 2520-, and 4000-Hz bands were presented. In experiment 2, the weight measurements only included the two mid-frequency bands, while the training only included the 1587-Hz band. ILD weights increased gradually from low- to high-frequency bands. When ILDs were reinforced during training, they increased for the 4000- (experiment 1) and 2520-Hz band (experiment 2). When ITDs were reinforced, ITD weights increased only for the 1587-Hz band (at specific azimuths). This suggests that ILD reweighting requires high, and ITD reweighting requires low frequencies without including frequency regions providing fine-structure ITD cues. The changes in binaural-cue weights were independent of the trained bands, suggesting some generalization of binaural-cue reweighting.

Chickens have excellent sound localization ability.

The mechanisms of sound localization are actively debated, especially which cues are predominately used and why. Our study provides behavioural data in chickens (Gallus gallus) and relates these to estimates of the perceived physical cues. Sound localization acuity was quantified as the minimum audible angle (MAA) in azimuth. Pure-tone MAA was 12.3, 9.3, 8.9 and 14.5 deg for frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz, respectively. Broadband-noise MAA was 12.2 deg, which indicates excellent behavioural acuity. We determined 'external cues' from head-related transfer functions of chickens. These were used to derive 'internal cues', taking into account published data on the effect of the coupled middle ears. Our estimates of the internal cues indicate that chickens likely relied on interaural time difference cues alone at low frequencies of 500 and 1000 Hz, whereas at 2000 and 4000 Hz, interaural level differences may be the dominant cue.

Lateralization of interaural level differences in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the perception of interaural level differences (ILDs) in children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) and compare them to normal hearing peers. As intracranial shifts in perception of ILDs might have an effect on localization, this was further investigated. METHODS: ILD responses on four different frequency bands (broadband, low-pass, mid-pass and high-pass) were measured in 9 children with BiCIs and 15 children with normal hearing. In the children with BiCIs, 7 of them were implanted sequentially and 2 of them simultaneously. The outcomes were compared with the outcomes from a previous study on advanced localization using the same stimuli as in the current study. The effect of chronological age, inter-implant delay and preoperative residual hearing were also taken into account. RESULTS: No significant differences in ILD responses between children with BiCIs and children with normal hearing were found. For broadband stimuli, children with sequential BiCIs showed a significant shift in their response towards the first implant. A significant correlation was found between inter-implant delay and shift in ILD response for the broadband and high-pass stimuli. The shift in ILD response had no effect on localization. CONCLUSION: Children with BiCIs are able to perceive ILD responses similar to those of normal hearing children. The inter-implant delay has a negative effect on the lateralization of the response towards the first implant side, indicative of deprivation of high-frequency sounds prior to receiving a second implant. This shift, however, is not associated with a shift in localization response.

Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Normal-hearing (NH) listeners rely on two binaural cues, the interaural time (ITD) and level difference (ILD), for azimuthal sound localization. Cochlear-implant (CI) listeners, however, rely almost entirely on ILDs. One reason is that present-day clinical CI stimulation strategies do not convey salient ITD cues. But even when presenting ITDs under optimal conditions using a research interface, ITD sensitivity is lower in CI compared to NH listeners. Since it has recently been shown that NH listeners change their ITD/ILD weighting when only one of the cues is consistent with visual information, such reweighting might add to CI listeners' low perceptual contribution of ITDs, given their daily exposure to reliable ILDs but unreliable ITDs. Six bilateral CI listeners completed a multi-day lateralization training visually reinforcing ITDs, flanked by a pre- and post-measurement of ITD/ILD weights without visual reinforcement. Using direct electric stimulation, we presented 100- and 300-pps pulse trains at a single interaurally place-matched electrode pair, conveying ITDs and ILDs in various spatially consistent and inconsistent combinations. The listeners' task was to lateralize the stimuli in a virtual environment. Additionally, ITD and ILD thresholds were measured before and after training. For 100-pps stimuli, the lateralization training increased the contribution of ITDs slightly, but significantly. Thresholds were neither affected by the training nor correlated with weights. For 300-pps stimuli, ITD weights were lower and ITD thresholds larger, but there was no effect of training. On average across test sessions, adding azimuth-dependent ITDs to stimuli containing ILDs increased the extent of lateralization for both 100- and 300-pps stimuli. The results suggest that low-rate ITD cues, robustly encoded with future CI systems, may be better exploitable for sound localization after increasing their perceptual weight via training.

Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant.

Spatial hearing is crucial in real life but deteriorates in participants with severe sensorineural hearing loss or single-sided deafness. This ability can potentially be improved with a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). The present study investigated measures of sound localization in participants with single-sided deafness provided with a CI. Sound localization was measured separately at eight loudspeaker positions (4°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) on the CI side and on the normal-hearing side. Low- and high-frequency noise bursts were used in the tests to investigate possible differences in the processing of interaural time and level differences. Data were compared to normal-hearing adults aged between 20 and 83. In addition, the benefit of the CI in speech understanding in noise was compared to the localization ability. Fifteen out of 18 participants were able to localize signals on the CI side and on the normal-hearing side, although performance was highly variable across participants. Three participants always pointed to the normal-hearing side, irrespective of the location of the signal. The comparison with control data showed that participants had particular difficulties localizing sounds at frontal locations and on the CI side. In contrast to most previous results, participants were able to localize low-frequency signals, although they localized high-frequency signals more accurately. Speech understanding in noise was better with the CI compared to testing without CI, but only at a position where the CI also improved sound localization. Our data suggest that a CI can, to a large extent, restore localization in participants with single-sided deafness. Difficulties may remain at frontal locations and on the CI side. However, speech understanding in noise improves when wearing the CI. The treatment with a CI in these participants might provide real-world benefits, such as improved orientation in traffic and speech understanding in difficult listening situations.

Temporary Unilateral Hearing Loss Impairs Spatial Auditory Information Processing in Neurons in the Central Auditory System.

Temporary conductive hearing loss (CHL) can lead to hearing impairments that persist beyond resolution of the CHL. In particular, unilateral CHL leads to deficits in auditory skills that rely on binaural input (e.g., spatial hearing). Here, we asked whether single neurons in the auditory midbrain, which integrate acoustic inputs from the two ears, are altered by a temporary CHL. We introduced 6 weeks of unilateral CHL to young adult chinchillas via foam earplug. Following CHL removal and restoration of peripheral input, single-unit recordings from inferior colliculus (ICC) neurons revealed the CHL decreased the efficacy of inhibitory input to the ICC contralateral to the earplug and increased inhibitory input ipsilateral to the earplug, effectively creating a higher proportion of monaural responsive neurons than binaural. Moreover, this resulted in a ∼10 dB shift in the coding of a binaural sound location cue (interaural-level difference, ILD) in ICC neurons relative to controls. The direction of the shift was consistent with a compensation of the altered ILDs due to the CHL. ICC neuron responses carried ∼37% less information about ILDs after CHL than control neurons. Cochlear peripheral-evoked responses confirmed that the CHL did not induce damage to the auditory periphery. We find that a temporary CHL altered auditory midbrain neurons by shifting binaural responses to ILD acoustic cues, suggesting a compensatory form of plasticity occurring by at least the level of the auditory midbrain, the ICC.

Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.

Acoustic hearing listeners use binaural cues-interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs)-for localization and segregation of sound sources in the horizontal plane. Cochlear implant users now often receive two implants (bilateral cochlear implants [BiCIs]) rather than one, with the goal to provide access to these cues. However, BiCI listeners often experience difficulty with binaural tasks. Most BiCIs use independent sound processors at each ear; it has often been suggested that such independence may degrade the transmission of binaural cues, particularly ITDs. Here, we report empirical measurements of binaural cue transmission via BiCIs implementing a common "n-of-m" spectral peak-picking stimulation strategy. Measurements were completed for speech and nonspeech stimuli presented to an acoustic manikin "fitted" with BiCI sound processors. Electric outputs from the BiCIs and acoustic outputs from the manikin's in-ear microphones were recorded simultaneously, enabling comparison of electric and acoustic binaural cues. For source locations away from the midline, BiCI binaural cues, particularly envelope ITD cues, were found to be degraded by asymmetric spectral peak-picking. In addition, pulse amplitude saturation due to nonlinear level mapping yielded smaller ILDs at higher presentation levels. Finally, while individual pulses conveyed a spurious "drifting" ITD, consistent with independent left and right processor clocks, such variation was not evident in transmitted envelope ITDs. Results point to avenues for improvement of BiCI technology and may prove useful in the interpretation of BiCI spatial hearing outcomes reported in prior and future studies.