Which would you choose again? Comparison of trapeziometacarpal implant versus resection arthroplasty in the same patient.

We invited 14 women who had undergone implant arthroplasty in one thumb and resection-suspension-interposition arthroplasty (RSIA) in the other to a follow-up visit at a median time of 2.2 and 6.2 years after implant and RSIA, respectively. In total, 12 patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome after implant arthroplasty, while eight patients reported this level of satisfaction for RSIA. Of the patients, 10 would choose an implant again, one would choose RSIA and three patients were undecided. The brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score and key pinch and grip strengths were significantly higher at follow-up for the thumb with the implant arthroplasty. Two revision operations were done 1.5 years after RSIA. Patients were satisfied with both procedures, but if they had to choose again, they would prefer implant arthroplasty.Level of evidence: III.

Basal thumb arthritis surgery: complications and its management.

The management of complications after surgery for basal thumb arthritis is sometimes challenging, and there are no clear recommendations on how to evaluate and manage patients with residual symptoms. The aim of the present article was to review the most common complications after surgery for basal thumb arthritis, with an emphasis on resection arthroplasty, joint replacement and joint fusion. In addition, possible management strategies for the different types of complications will be highlighted.

Diagnostic and treatment recommendations for recurrent or persistent symptoms after trapeziectomy: a Delphi study.

The aim of this Delphi study was to provide a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms after trapeziometacarpal joint resection arthroplasty. Three Delphi rounds were conducted in which surveys were sent to 182 experienced hand surgeons worldwide. Responses were received from 140 participants. A consensus threshold was set at 67% agreement. Diagnostic tools and treatment approaches for six common revision scenarios achieved consensus. Radiographs are appropriate as primary (97%) and CT scans as secondary (76%) diagnostic tools. For scaphometacarpal impingement, 67% of respondents agreed that revision interposition is appropriate, with 93% recommending autologous tendon for the interposition. Additional suspension was considered appropriate by 68% of the participants. The diagnostic and treatment algorithm can help the surgeon to identify the reason for persistent symptoms after trapeziometacarpal joint resection arthroplasty and to choose an appropriate treatment strategy.Level of evidence: V.

Short-term recovery after implant versus resection arthroplasty in trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.

We compared the short-term recovery of patients treated with trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) implant arthroplasty versus resection-suspension-interposition (RSI) arthroplasty. Implant patients (n = 147) had a better 3-month postoperative brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) score (mean 82) compared to RSI patients (n = 127), who had a mean score of 69. Key pinch strength at 3 months was also higher in the implant group compared to the RSI group (6.8 kg vs. 3.1 kg). At 1 year, both groups had similar brief MHQ scores, but key pinch remained higher in the implant group (7.0 kg vs. 3.9 kg [RSI]). After implant arthroplasty, employed patients returned to work after a mean of 44 days, which was significantly faster than the 84 days for RSI patients. Patients after TMJ implant arthroplasty recover significantly faster in the first 3 postoperative months compared to RSI patients. However, 1-year postoperative outcomes are similar for both cohorts, with key pinch strength remaining higher for patients with TMJ implant arthroplasty.Level of evidence: II.

Thumb-Basal Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Metacarpal Subsidence: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Trapeziectomy With Suture Button Suspensionplasty Versus Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition.

BACKGROUND: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). METHODS: Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.

Arthroscopy-assisted partial trapeziectomy combined with ligament reconstruction for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: A different technique.

Background: There is no consensus on the best surgery option for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC OA). The traditional method has the risk of large trauma, obvious metacarpal subsidence, and decreased stability. The aim of this study is to introduce a different technique to restore the function and stability of the first carpal metacarpal joint with minimal trauma, rapid pain relief, reduced complications, and the clinical outcomes in the long-term follow-up was evaluated and statistically analyzed. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 10 patients with a mean age of 51.8 years. The surgery consisted of removing partial trapezium through arthroscopy, reconstructing the stability with flexor carpi radialis suspension and tendon interposition. The subjective assessment included visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Quick-DASH) score, and patient satisfaction. The range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, and radiographic assessment, which can reflect stability of the thumb, were objectively evaluated and statistically analyzed. Results: Ten patients were monitored at a mean follow-up of 6.8 years. The mean grip strength improved significantly from 16.64 to 22.57 kg after surgery. Pinch strength improved significantly from 3.72 to 5.71 kg on average. The Kapandji score improved significantly from 5.7 to 8.6 on average. 80% (8/10) of the patients were satisfied with this surgery. On objective indicators, the VAS score decreased significantly from 6.4 to 1.3 on average. The mean Quick-DASH score improved significantly from 6.1 to 28.9. Postoperative x-ray showed slight subsidence and dislocation of the first metacarpal in two patients and did not affect the function by measurement. Conclusion: Arthroscopy-assisted partial trapezium resection combined with ligament reconstruction could be a workable and promising surgical technique in patients with thumb CMC OA. It can offer the advantages of minimizing surgical injury by preserving the first carpal metacarpal joint capsule to protect its stability, with a rapid pain relief, function improvement, and satisfactory results in patients' clinical measurements.

Lessons Learned: Trapeziectomy and Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis.

In this study, we describe refinements of an accepted technique made by a single surgeon for trapeziectomy and suture suspension arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis after 220 cases over 4 years. Results are derived from 77 patients who underwent treatment using this technique comparing postoperative results with preoperative assessment and had sufficient data for inclusion. The surgical technique is described, including tips and modifications to avoid known possible complications. All patients in this study had advanced Eaton stage III or IV osteoarthritis. Grip strength and key pinch showed statistically significant improvement, and the improvement in palmar pinch approached significance. Pain scores were significantly decreased with over 50% of the patients rating their pain at 0 postoperatively. The overall complication rate was very low, and improvements in technique were made to mitigate future occurrence. This surgical technique for the treatment of thumb CMC arthritis achieved pain relief and recreated ligamentous support of the base of the first metacarpal to resist proximal migration after trapeziectomy, providing an increase in grip strength and key pinch with return of range of motion early in the postoperative period. Refinements on this technique through a large volume single surgeon experience provide technical tips for optimizing outcomes.

Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition versus Trapeziometacarpal Joint Replacement for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background The trapeziometacarpal articulation in the thumb is a joint that is second-most commonly affected by osteoarthritis, and this can lead to considerable hand pain and disability. Currently, there is a multiplicity of surgical options available to address this problem, yet none has proven to be significantly superior to the others. Objective This study aims to compare the outcome of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition versus trapeziometacarpal joint replacement for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. The NICE Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS) tool was used to search articles. One randomized controlled trial (RCT), one prospective cohort study and two retrospective cohort studies were identified. Results Our results demonstrate a significant difference in the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) score between the trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) and Joint Replacement groups with the joint replacement group exhibiting better QDASH scores than the LRTI group. We also found that those who had a joint replacement had a significantly better thumb opposition than those in the LRTI group, as demonstrated by a superior Kapandji score. However, the complication rate of joint replacement appears to be higher. Conclusion Our study reveals that while both treatment options are valid, the limited body of evidence currently available shows that joint replacement carries more risks and thus should not replace the current standard treatment of trapeziectomy with LRTI. This study highlights the need for more trials to be performed to more accurately compare the two treatment modalities. For the time being, we advocate that joint replacement is only performed by surgeons who perform this procedure regularly to reduce the risk of complications.

Risk factors for residual pain after ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition on osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.

BACKGROUND: Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) is currently the most performed procedure for osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. In general, satisfactory outcomes are expected, although some patients complain of residual pain after LRTI. The objective of this study is to determine the factors associated with residual pain. METHOD: All patients with OA of the thumb CMC joint who underwent LRTI at our hospital between October 2013 and October 2018 and were regularly observed for at least 1 year were included. The following variables were extracted and included in the univariate analysis: sex, age, dominant hand, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, Eaton classification, grip strength, pulp pinch strength, and metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension angle were recorded as variables. Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher exact test was used for univariate analysis of the above factors, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the factors associated with residual pain. RESULTS: The study included 60 thumbs of 53 patients. Eleven thumbs had postoperative residual pain. The surgery on the dominant hand was significantly associated with the presence of postoperative residual pain, especially in males. CONCLUSIONS: Dominant hand was associated with residual pain after LRTI for OA of the thumb CMC joint, although residual pain was minimal. Our findings will help in preoperative and postoperative counseling of patients. In the future, our results may also help select surgical procedures according to the patient's characteristics.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Thumb Carpometacarpal Resection Arthroplasty: A Health Economic Study Using Real-World Data.

PURPOSE: Knowledge about the costs and benefits of hand surgical interventions is important for surgeons, payers, and policy makers. Little is known about the cost-effectiveness of surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. The objective of this study was to examine patients' quality of life and economic costs, with focus on the cost-utility ratio 1 year after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis compared with that for continued nonsurgical management. METHODS: Patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis indicated for resection arthroplasty were included in a prospective study. The quality of life (using European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level), direct medical costs, and productivity losses were assessed up to 1 year after surgery. Baseline data at recruitment and costs sustained over 1 year before surgery served as a proxy for nonsurgical management. The total costs to gain 1 extra quality-adjusted life year and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated from a health care system and a societal perspective. RESULTS: The mean European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level value for 151 included patients improved significantly from 0.69 to 0.88 (after surgery). The productivity loss during the preoperative period was 47% for 49 working patients, which decreased to 26% 1 year after surgery. The total costs increased from US $20,451 in the preoperative year to US $24,374 in the postoperative year. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US $25,370 per quality-adjusted life year for surgery compared with that for simulated nonsurgical management. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was clearly below the suggested Swiss threshold of US $92,000, indicating that thumb carpometacarpal surgery is a cost-effective intervention. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analyses II.

Trapeziectomy with or without a tendon-based adjunct: a registry-based study of 650 thumbs.

This study aimed to assess the outcomes after simple trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition based on data in the Swedish national healthcare quality registry for hand surgery (HAKIR). Six-hundred and fifty thumbs were included, and 265 were assessed up to 12 months after operation. There was significant and clinically relevant improvement in patient-reported measures (pain on load, pain on motion without load, pain at rest, stiffness, weakness, and ability to perform activities of daily living and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score) and objective measures (strength and thumb mobility) at 3 and 12 months for all procedures. The use of the abductor pollicis longus tendon had better improvement in some respects compared with the use of flexor carpi radialis or extensor carpi radialis tendons. However, overall, the use of a tendon adjuncts yielded no better outcomes than simple trapeziectomy.Level of evidence: III.

Efficacy of Abductor Pollicis Longus Suspensionplasty Compared to Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition.

Background: Multiple surgical techniques are described for basal joint osteoarthritis. This study compares clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with trapeziectomy and abductor pollicis longus (APL) suspensionplasty compared to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) when performed by 2 fellowship-trained hand surgeons. Methods: A retrospective review of 51 consecutive patients undergoing APL suspensionplasty (53 hands) was performed. With this technique, a distally based APL slip is brought through and sewn to the flexor carpi radialis (FCR). The remaining APL is placed in the trapeziectomy void. This technique was compared to 151 patients (166 hands) who underwent LRTI using the FCR tendon. Outcomes assessed included postoperative pain relief, grip and pinch strength, complications, and need for reoperation. Two-tailed, Fisher's exact test was used for data analysis. Results: APL suspensionplasty resulted in postoperative pain relief in 92.5% (n = 49) compared to 94.0% (n = 156) with LRTI (P = .758). Mean postoperative grip and pinch strengths with APL suspensionplasty were 41.2 and 10.4 kg, respectively. With LRTI, average grip strength was 42.0 kg, and pinch was 10.1 kg. Both techniques were well tolerated with minimal complications. In the APL group, 1 patient had a postoperative infection requiring drainage. Among the LRTI cases, 1 wound dehiscence required closure, and 2 minor postoperative wound infections resolved with oral antibiotics. Mean follow-up time among APL suspensionplasty patients was 3.3 months compared to 8.4 months following LRTI. Conclusions: APL suspensionplasty is a safe, effective procedure which provides similar pain relief and functional outcomes compared to LRTI.

Preoperative prognostic factors associated with poor early recovery after trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) is performed for treating thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. However, patients occasionally experience delayed postoperative recovery. Although several prognostic factors associated with long-term outcomes have been identified, the factors associated with delayed recovery after trapeziectomy with LRTI have not been identified. HYPOTHESIS: When we define major disability in the early postoperative period at 3 months after LRTI surgery as delayed recovery, some preoperative factors can influence with delayed recovery. Moreover, delayed recovery can influence the long-term therapeutic outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty thumbs that underwent trapeziectomy with LRTI (mean follow-up period, 29.3 months) were retrospectively analyzed. Major disability was defined by both DASH and Hand20 scores≥35 after surgery, and patients were divided into groups 1 (major disability; n=9) and 2 (no major disability; n=21) according to the scores at 3 months after surgery. Preoperative data, including age, sex, preoperative symptom duration, dominant hand surgery, concurrent surgery with LRTI, previous orthopedic surgery, employment, stage of osteoarthritis, thickness of the trapezium, metacarpophalangeal hyperextension deformity, DASH score, Hand20 score, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain, grip strength, pinch strength, and range of motion of the thumb were compared between groups to identify the factors indicating a poor prognosis at 3 months after surgery. We also compared the clinical outcomes at the 12-month and final follow-up. RESULTS: Dominant hand surgery, previous orthopedic surgery, and preoperative poor DASH score were significantly more frequent in group 1, while the other factors did not show significant intergroup differences. Moreover, group 1 showed significantly poorer DASH score, grip and pinch strength, and active flexion of the thumb metacarpal joint at both the 12-month and final follow-up. This group also showed significantly poorer Hand20 and VAS scores at the final follow-up. DISCUSSION: Dominant hand surgery, previous orthopedic surgery, and preoperative poor DASH score were associated with poor recovery at 3 months after trapeziectomy with LRTI. Moreover, major disability at 3 months after surgery influenced poor clinical outcomes at the 12-month and final follow-ups. These data could be useful for counseling patients regarding the expected recovery duration and outcomes after LRTI surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective therapeutic study.

Outcomes and recommendations for revision of thumb carpometacarpal resection arthroplasty.

This study investigated revision surgery for the thumb after failed trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition and defined a revision concept. Twenty-four patients with 25 affected thumbs were examined at a mean of 5.5 years after their last revision operation. Pain during daily activities was 2.7 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, pain at rest was 1.6 and the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score was 63. Although 68% of patients indicated that their thumb was better than before primary surgery, the outcome after revision surgery was less favourable than that reported for primary trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. We defined a revision algorithm to use as a guide for patients with residual symptoms after resection arthroplasty. The main reason for revision, symptomatic impingement of the thumb metacarpal, should be treated with resection of the metacarpal base and scaphotrapezoidal joint. An existing interposition should be revised, or a new interposition should be used, preferably with an autologous tendon or alternately with an allograft.Level of evidence: IV.

Simple trapeziectomy versus trapeziectomy with flexor carpi radialis suspension: a 17-year follow-up of a randomized blind trial.

The purpose of this study was to investigate if there were any significant differences in the long-term outcomes of patients who participated in a randomized trial of trapeziectomy alone compared with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Sixty-five patients were invited for a follow-up visit at a mean of 17 years (range 15-20) postoperatively. Twenty-eight patients attended, who had 34 operations, 14 trapeziectomy alone and 20 with LRTI. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of satisfaction with surgery or functional outcomes, with most measurements showing minimal or no differences in means between the two groups. There was no difference in the space between the metacarpal and scaphoid. Radial abduction was the only parameter that was significantly greater in the patients with simple trapeziectomy (median 79°) compared with trapeziectomy with LRTI (median 71°) (p = 0.04). Even at 17 years there is no significant benefit of LRTI over trapeziectomy alone for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.Level of evidence: I.

Suspension Arthroplasty Combined with Ligament Reconstruction of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint to Salvage Two Failed Arthroplasties: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Thumb basal joint arthroplasty with removal of the entire trapezium is often followed by proximal subsidence and impingement of the thumb metacarpal to the scaphoid, which is a common cause of post-operative thumb pain. Treatment of this impingement is a challenge among surgeons. We performed suspension arthroplasty combined with intercarpal ligament reconstruction using a strip of the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) tendon on a patient suffering from pain caused by this type of the impingement and obtained a successful outcome. CASE REPORT: We treated a 52-year-old female pianist who complained of pain in her left thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. She had undergone two previous ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty procedures on the joint, for which strips of the flexor carpi radialis tendon and the abductor pollicis longus tendon were used in the first and second operations, respectively. The pre-operative X-ray demonstrated proximal subsidence and impingement of the first metacarpal on the scaphoid. We performed suspension arthroplasty combined with intercarpal ligament reconstruction using a strip of the ECRL tendon to create the trapezial space. 3 years after surgery, despite the 3 mm subsidence of the thumb compared with immediately after surgery, her thumb pinch and grip strength had improved, and the thumb basal pain was relieved. CONCLUSION: This case shows that suspension arthroplasty with intermetacarpal ligament reconstruction using an ECRL strip can be applied in revision surgery for impingement of the first metacarpal with the scaphoid following thumb CMC joint arthroplasty after removal of the entire trapezium. This is the first report to describe the treatment of first metacarpal impingement after CMC joint arthroplasty using suspension arthroplasty combined with intercarpal ligament reconstruction.

Mini Tightrope Fixation Versus Ligament Reconstruction - Tendon Interposition for Maintenance of Post-trapeziectomy Space Height: A Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To test the biomechanical stability of ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) compared with Mini TightRope fixation for thumb metacarpal subsidence after trapeziectomy. METHODS: Fifteen fresh human cadaveric hands underwent trapeziectomy and were divided into 3 treatment groups: LRTI using a biotenodesis screw and single versus dual Mini TightRope fixation. The thumb and index fingers were removed distal to the metacarpal; the distal ends of the metacarpals and proximal radius were potted in urethane resin and mounted onto a servohydraulic testing machine. A cyclic axial load was applied to stress the trapezial cavity. We recorded displacement of the first metacarpal via the position of the actuator head and computed the size of the trapezial space as the difference of the initial size and first metacarpal displacement. Each specimen underwent cyclical loading until the first metacarpal had collapsed completely onto the scaphoid (failure of the repair) or until 6 hours of testing had been completed. The number of cycles to failure, change in the size of the trapezium cavity, and relative change in size of the trapezium cavity were determined. RESULTS: The trapezial space had completely closed before 6 hours of testing were completed in all biotenodesis screw-augmented LRTI specimens and remained present in all single and dual Mini TightRope specimens. Absolute (and normalized) changes in the size of the trapezial cavity in the single and dual Mini TightRope specimens were 11 ± 2 and 10 ± 2 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dual Mini TightRope fixation provided superior load bearing and maintenance of trapezial space height compared with single Mini TightRope or LRTI biotenodesis screw procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that patients who undergo suture suspension arthroplasty may be able to move earlier because of the immediate stability the construct affords.

Trapeziectomy Arthroplasty With Suture Suspension: Short- to Medium-Term Outcomes From a Single-Surgeon Experience.

PURPOSE: To describe the technique and a single-surgeon experience with a suture suspension and first dorsal compartment release treatment for thumb trapeziometacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis. METHODS: We performed 19 procedures on 18 patients using this technique and compared results with preoperative assessment. At an average of 20 months (range, 8-45 months) after surgery, standard measures after TMC joint arthroplasty were performed. RESULTS: All patients had advanced Eaton stage III or IV osteoarthritis. Grip strength, key pinch, and thumb abduction showed statistically significant increases of 7 kg, 0.7 kg, and 4°, respectively. Seventeen of 18 patients no longer had reports of TMC joint pain on follow-up. There was one reoperation for pain because of osteophytes at the ulnar surface of the thumb metacarpal base, which resolved with proximal metacarpal excision. One case of index metacarpal fracture was treated with an orthosis. CONCLUSIONS: This surgical technique for the treatment of thumb TMC joint arthritis achieved pain relief and recreated support of the base of the metacarpal to resist proximal migration or radial deviation. This technique also provided an increase in grip strength and key pinch with return of range of motion early in the postoperative period. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.