Triiodothyronine supplementation in a sheep model of intensive care.

Triiodothyronine (T3) concentrations in plasma decrease during acute illness and it is unclear if this contributes to disease. Clinical and laboratory studies of T3 supplementation in disease have revealed little or no effect. It is uncertain if short term supplementation of T3 has any discernible effect in a healthy animals. Observational study of intravenous T3 (1 µg/kg/h) for 24 h in a healthy sheep model receiving protocol-guided intensive care supports (T3 group, n=5). A total of 45 endpoints were measured including hemodynamic, respiratory, renal, hematological, metabolic and endocrine parameters. Data were compared with previously published studies of sheep subject to the same support protocol without administered T3 (No T3 group, n=5). Plasma free T3 concentrations were elevated 8-fold by the infusion (pmol/l at 24 h; T3 group 34.9±9.9 vs. No T3 group 4.4±0.3, P<0.01, reference range 1.6 to 6.8). There was no significant physiological response to administration of T3 over the study duration. Supplementation of intravenous T3 for 24 h has no physiological effect on relevant physiological endpoints in healthy sheep. Further research is required to understand if the lack of effect of short-term T3 may be related to kinetics of T3 cellular uptake, metabolism and action, or acute counterbalancing hormone resistance. This information may be helpful in design of clinical T3 supplementation trials.

Evaluating the effectiveness of combined T4 and T3 therapy or desiccated thyroid versus T4 monotherapy in hypothyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Persistent symptoms in hypothyroid patients despite normalized TSH levels suggest the need for alternative treatments. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combined T4 and T3 therapy or desiccated thyroid (DTE) compared to T4 monotherapy, with a focus on thyroid profile, lipid profile, and quality of life metrics. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in Embase, Medline/PubMed, and Web of Science up to 11/23/2023. We used the following keywords: "Armour Thyroid," OR "Thyroid extract," OR "Natural desiccated thyroid," OR "Nature-Throid," "desiccated thyroid," OR "np thyroid," OR "Synthroid," OR "levothyroxine," OR "Liothyronine," "Cytomel," OR "Thyroid USP," OR "Unithroid." AND "hypothyroidism. " We only included RCTs and excluded non-RCT, case-control studies, and non-English articles. RESULTS: From 6,394 identified records, 16 studies qualified after screening and eligibility checks. We included two studies on desiccated thyroid and 15 studies on combined therapy. In this meta-analysis, combination therapy with T4 + T3 revealed significantly lower Free T4 levels (mean difference (MD): -0.34; 95% CI: -0.47, -0.20), Total T4 levels (mean difference: -2.20; 95% CI: -3.03, -1.37), and GHQ-28 scores (MD: -2.89; 95% CI: -3.16, -2.63), compared to T4 monotherapy. Total T3 levels were significantly higher in combined therapy (MD: 29.82; 95% CI: 22.40, 37.25). The analyses demonstrated moderate to high heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in Heart Rate, SHBG, TSH, Lipid profile, TSQ-36, and BDI Score. Subjects on DTE had significantly higher serum Total T3 levels (MD: 50.90; 95% CI: 42.39, 59.42) and significantly lower serum Total T4 (MD: -3.11; 95% CI: -3.64, -2.58) and Free T4 levels (MD: -0.50; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.43) compared to T4 monotherapy. Moreover, DTE treatment showed modestly higher TSH levels (MD: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.80). The analyses indicated low heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in Heart Rate, SHBG, Lipid profile, TSQ-36, GHQ-28, and BDI Score. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that combined therapy and DTE lead to higher T3 and lower T4 levels, compared to T4 monotherapy in hypothyroidism. However, no significant effects on heart rate, lipid profile, or quality of life were noted. Given the heterogeneity of results, personalized treatment approaches are recommended.

Liothyronine (LT3) prescribing in England: Are cost constraints inhibiting guideline implementation?

BACKGROUND: Primary hypothyroidism affects about 3% of the general population in Europe. In most cases people with hypothyroidism are treated with levothyroxine. In the context of the 2023 British Thyroid Association guidance and the 2020 Competitions and Marketing Authority (CMA) ruling, we examined prescribing data for levothyroxine, Natural desiccated thyroid (NDT) and liothyronine by dose, regarding changes over the years 2016-2022. DESIGN: Monthly primary care prescribing data for each British National Formulary code were analysed for levothyroxine, liothyronine and NDT. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: The rolling 12-month total/average of cost or prescribing volume was used to identify the moment of change. Results included number of prescriptions, the actual costs, and the cost/prescription/mcg of drug. RESULTS: Liothyronine: In 2016 94% of the total 74,500 prescriptions were of the 20 mcg dose. In 2020 the percentage prescribed in the 5 mcg and 10 mcg doses started to increase so that by 2022 each reached nearly 27% of total liothyronine prescribing. The average cost/prescription in 2016 of 20 mcg was £404/prescription and this fell by 80% to £101 in 2022; while the 10 mcg cost of £348/prescription fell by only 35% to £255 and the 5 mcg cost of £355/prescription fell by 38% to £242/prescription. The total prescriptions of liothyronine in 2016 were 74,605, falling by 30% up to 2019 when they started to grow again - most recently at 60,990-15% lower than the 2016 figure, with the result that total costs fell by 70% to £9 m/year. CONCLUSIONS: Liothyronine costs fell after the CMA ruling but remain orders of magnitude higher than for levothyroxine. The remaining 0.2% of patients with liothyronine treated hypothyroidism are still absorbing 16% of medication costs. The lower liothyronine 5cmg and 10 mcg doses as recommended by BTA are 240% the costs of the 20 mcg dose. Thus, following latest BTA guidance which recommends the lower liothyronine doses still incurs substantial additional costs vs the prescribing liothyronine in the no longer recommended treatment regime. High drug price continues to impact clinical decisions, potentially limiting liothyronine therapy availability to a considerable number of patients who could benefit from this treatment.

Successful Treatment of Bexarotene-Induced Central Hypothyroidism.

The synthetic retinoid bexarotene (BXT), used in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), has been associated with central hypothyroidism due to suppression of thyrotropin (TSH) secretion and upregulation of peripheral thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) metabolism. We present a case of a 41-year-old man with CTCL who developed central hypothyroidism within 1 month of receiving BXT. He required sequential uptitration of levothyroxine (LT4) over 15 months, and free T4 (FT4) and total T3 levels were normalized by a daily regimen of LT4 600 mcg and liothyronine (LT3) 15 mcg. While almost all patients regain normal hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis function after cessation of BXT, there are limited data regarding LT4 and LT3 dosing required to adequately treat central hypothyroidism in patients on BXT. Our patient required an LT4 dose approximately 2.8 times the calculated weight-based dose and LT3 supplementation, demonstrating a large LT4/LT3 combination dose may be required to compensate for BXT-induced central hypothyroidism.

Thyroid hormone resistance and large goiter mimicking infiltrative carcinoma in a pediatric patient.

OBJECTIVES: Resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH) is a genetic condition, caused by mutations in the thyroid hormone receptor gene and characterized by impaired end organ responsiveness to thyroid hormone. Here we describe a novel case of THR associated with large goiter mimicking infiltrative c. CASE PRESENTATION: A 13-year-old male with a hyperthyroid phenotype of RTH diagnosed as a toddler, on methimazole and nadolol therapies presented with an increase in goiter size and possible nodule. Thyroid ultrasound was concerning for a diffuse infiltrative process or malignancy. Methimazole was discontinued and he underwent further imaging, fine needle aspiration and core biopsies. Biopsy results were reassuring and imaging findings were subsequently attributed to RTH rather than malignancy. He started every other day liothyronine therapy, which led to a decrease in goiter size, thyroglobulin level, and improvement of hyperthyroid symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case to our knowledge describing the above thyroid imaging findings in association with RTH. It also adds important information to the pediatric literature regarding management of the hyperthyroid phenotype of RTH, including the role of liothyronine therapy.

Emerging Therapies in Hypothyroidism.

Levothyroxine (LT4) is effective for most patients with hypothyroidism. However, a minority of the patients remain symptomatic despite the normalization of serum thyrotropin levels. Randomized clinical trials including all types of patients with hypothyroidism revealed that combination levothyroxine and liothyronine (LT4+LT3) therapy is safe and is the preferred choice of patients versus LT4 alone. Many patients who do not fully benefit from LT4 experience improved quality of life and cognition after switching to LT4+LT3. For these patients, new slow-release LT3 formulations that provide stable serum T3 levels are being tested. In addition, progress in regenerative technology has led to the development of human thyroid organoids that restore euthyroidism after being transplanted into hypothyroid mice. Finally, there is a new understanding that, under certain conditions, T3 signaling may be compromised in a tissue-specific fashion while systemic thyroid function is preserved. This is seen, for example, in patients with metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease, for whom liver-selective T3-like molecules have been utilized successfully in clinical trials.

Screening of liothyronine network pharmacology role in the treatment of ischemic stroke and molecular mechanism.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to elucidate mechanisms of liothyronine on the treatment of ischemic stroke (IS). METHODS: Differential analysis based on R limma package was used to identify differentially expressed genes, which were then mapped into the connectivity map database for identification of liothyronine associated with IS. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathway was verified through pathway enrichment analysis via Enrichr online. Ischemia stroke mouse model was built up for further analysis. Infarct area and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were measured by 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride and laser Doppler flowmetry, respectively. Light microscope was used for the evaluation of body weight and dark neurons. Serum TXB2 , 6-Keto-PGF1a , TNF-α, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in mice were measured using enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay. In addition, relative protein expression levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, nestin, and Sox2 were detected by Western blot analysis. RESULTS: Liothyronine with a negative connectivity was identified as one promising treatment for IS through TNF signaling pathway. The experimental results showed that liothyronine treatment significantly meliorated infarct area and the number of dark neurons in IS mice. Liothyronine greatly ameliorated the expression levels of TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1a . Besides, rCBF and body weight change of IS mice were increased gradually with increase of drug concentration. Based on pathway enrichment analysis, anti-inflammatory response (TNF-α and IL-6) relevant to TNF signaling pathway was identified, which was further validated in vitro. Furthermore, proteins as neural stem cell markers made a difference with liothyronine treatment. CONCLUSION: Liothyronine may be a novel therapeutic component to exploit an effective medicine for the treatment of IS.

Adequacy of thyroid hormone replacement for people with hypothyroidism in real-world settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid hormone under-replacement and over-replacement are associated with adverse health outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the extent of thyroid hormone replacement adequacy for patients with known hypothyroidism in real-word settings, excluding those receiving thyroid hormone suppressive therapy as thyroid cancer treatment. DESIGN: Four electronic databases (Embase [Ovid], Medline [Ovid], PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for published and unpublished observational studies until 12 December 2022. The results of the studies were meta-analysed to calculate pooled prevalence estimates for thyroid hormone supplementation adequacy, over-replacement and under-replacement. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the Joanna-Briggs appraisal tool for prevalence studies. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 4230 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The pooled prevalence estimates of adequate thyroid replacement, over-replacement and under-replacement were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.60, p = .001), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.27, p = .001) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.13-0.36, p = .001), respectively. Four studies subclassified hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism into overt and subclinical. The pooled prevalence of overt and subclinical hyperthyroidism was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00-0.11, p = .01) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.09-0.27 p = .001), respectively. For overt and subclinical hypothyroidism, the pooled prevalence was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.03, p = .001) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12-0.29, p = .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On average, approximately half of patients with hypothyroidism are only treated to target euthyroidism. In real-world practice, a significant number of patients are over-treated or under-treated, leading to adverse healthcare outcomes. It is imperative that more effective thyroid monitoring strategies be implemented, with an emphasis on primary care thyroid function monitoring, to minimise inappropriate thyroid replacement treatments and optimise healthcare outcomes at a population level.

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial on levothyroxine and liothyronine combination therapy in totally thyroidectomized subjects: the LEVOLIO study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite having normal thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, many hypothyroid patients are dissatisfied with the treatment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of twice-daily, combination therapy with levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3), at doses adapted according to TSH-level, on peripheral tissues as reflected by sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels in totally thyroidectomized patients. Changes in other tissue markers and quality of life considering DIO2-rs225014 and MCT10-rs17606253 genetic variants were also assessed. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one subjects were randomized to LT4 + LT3 group (LT4 + LT3 in the morning and LT3 in the evening; n = 70) or placebo group (LT4 in the morning and placebo in the evening; n = 71). Pituitary-thyroid axis compensation was assessed after 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Clinical parameters, quality of life, and tissue markers (sex hormone binding globulin, serum lipids, bone markers) were evaluated at 12 and 24 weeks. DIO2 and MCT10 single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped. RESULTS: The LT4 + LT3 group was treated with mean daily LT3 doses of 5.00 µg, with a mean daily LT4 reduction of 15 µg. After 6 months of treatment, neither SHBG and other tissue markers nor quality of life differed significantly between groups. Combination treatment required greater dose adjustments than placebo (25% vs 54%, P < .001), due to thyroid-stimulating hormone reduction, without hyperthyroidism signs or symptoms. At the end of treatment, the LT4 + placebo group had significantly lower fT3/fT4 compared to the LT4 + LT3 group (0.26 ± 0.05 vs 0.32 ± 0.08, P < .001). No preference for combination therapy was found. Genetic variants did not influence any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of combination therapy with twice-daily LT3 dose adapted according to TSH-level do not significantly change peripheral tissue response or quality of life, despite an increase in the fT3/fT4 ratio.

Preliminary Results of a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Cardiometabolic Effects of Levothyroxine and Liothyronine Compared to Levothyroxine with Placebo in Athyreotic Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer Patients.

Background: Evidence is needed on the risks and benefits of combination therapy with levothyroxine (LT4)+liothyronine (LT3) for the treatment of hypothyroidism. Objective and Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study to assess the effects of LT4+LT3 therapy versus LT4+placebo in a homogeneous group of athyreotic patients, without cardiovascular risk factors during long-term replacement monotherapy with LT4. The primary objective of the study was to assess the effects of combination LT4+LT3 therapy on heart rate, cardiac rhythm, and sensitive cardiovascular parameters of cardiac morphology and function by means of electrocardiography and Doppler echocardiography. The secondary objective of the study was to evaluate patient compliance, tolerability, and potential adverse events. Results: Thirty-eight patients with postsurgical hypothyroidism satisfying the inclusion criteria were selected from a group of 300 patients with low-risk thyroid cancer followed for a routine follow-up; they were randomized to receive LT4+LT3 or LT4+placebo. Twenty-four patients were evaluated after 1 year of treatment. All clinical and laboratory parameters were compared with the results obtained from 50 healthy euthyroid volunteers without comorbidities, matched for gender, age, physical activity, and lifestyle. Participants and clinicians remained blinded to the treatment allocation. After 1 year of combination therapy, a significant improvement in the diastolic function, evidenced by a significant reduction in the E/e' ratio (p = 0.046) and its positive trend over time, was observed in the LT4+LT3 group versus the LT4+placebo group. In addition, the univariate analyses showed a significant relationship between free triiodothyronine (fT3) levels (in pg/mL) with Δ of variation of the E/e' ratio in the LT4+LT3 group (standardized ß coefficient = 0.603 [confidence interval: 0.001-1.248], p = 0.050) after combination therapy. No adverse events including tachycardia, arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, or other important events occurred between the first administration and the end of the study. Conclusions: In this preliminary report, combination treatment with LT4+LT3 induced favorable changes in cardiovascular parameters of diastolic function without any adverse cardiovascular events. Trial Registration: EUDRACT number: 2017-001261-25.

Use of thyroid hormones in hypothyroid and euthyroid patients: a 2022 THESIS questionnaire survey of members of the Latin American Thyroid Society (LATS).

PURPOSE: Inconsistencies in the medical management of hypothyroidism have been reported between endocrinologists in different countries. This study aimed to identify the attitudes of Latin America thyroid specialists towards the use of thyroid hormones. METHODS: Online survey of members of the Latin America Thyroid Society. RESULTS: 81/446 (18.2%) completed the questionnaire. Levothyroxine (LT4) was the initial treatment of choice for all respondents. 56.8% would consider LT4 use in biochemically euthyroid patients: infertile women with elevated anti-thyroid antibodies (46.9%), resistant depression (17.3%) and growing goiter (12%). Most respondents preferred tablets (39.5%) over liquid formulations (21.0%) or soft gel capsules (22.2%) and would not consider switching formulations in patients with persistent symptoms. 39.5% would never use LT4 + liothyronine (LT3) combination therapy in symptomatic euthyroid patients, due to low quality evidence for benefit. 60.5% reported that persistence of symptoms despite normal TSH is rare (below 5% of patients) and its prevalence has been stable over the last five years. Psychosocial factors (84.0%), comorbidities (86.4%) and the patient unrealistic expectation (72.8%) were considered the top three explanations for this phenomenon. CONCLUSION: LT4 tablets is the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism. A significant proportion of respondents would use LT4 in some groups of euthyroid individuals, contrasting the recommendations of the major clinical practice guideline indications. LT4 + LT3 combination treatment in euthyroid symptomatic patients was considered by nearly 50%. Practices based on weak or absent evidence included use of thyroid hormones for euthyroid subjects by 56.8% of respondents and use of LT4 + LT3 treatment by 60.5% of respondents for patients with persistent symptoms. In contrast to many European countries, LATS respondents report a low and unchanged proportion of dissatisfied patients over the last five years.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the combined preparation of levothyroxine plus sustained- release liothyronine; a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Understanding pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the sustained-release liothyronine (SR-T3) is of paramount importance to design therapeutic regimens that are able to simulate normal thyroid hormone secretion while avoiding excursions in the T3 serum concentration. Here, we designed a parallel randomized clinical trial to characterize the PK and PD of the combined preparations of LT4 + SR-T3 in hypothyroid patients. METHODS: Radioiodine-treated hypothyroid patients over 20 years of age, who attained euthyroidism with LT4 monotherapy were recruited from the Endocrine Clinic in Tehran. The patients were allocated to two intervention groups of group A: 9 µg SR-T3 plus 68.5 µg LT4 (ratio 1:7.5) and group B: 12 µg SR-T3 plus 60 µg LT4 (ratio 1:5), and a control group with LT4 monotherapy. For PD study, thyroid hormone profile was evaluated at 8 and 12 weeks intervals after intervention. To assess PK properties of SR-T3, T3-Cmax, T3-Tmax and AUC0 - 24 were calculated at the last visit. RESULTS: Serum T4 and FT4 concentrations decreased in the intervention groups after 3 months. No significant difference was observed in serum T3 and FT3 concentrations before and after intervention. Serum T3/T4 ratio increased significantly in the intervention groups after intervention, with the highest increase in group B from 8.6 ± 2.03 at baseline to 12.2 ± 1.6. Comparison of trial groups at follow-up showed no differences in serum TSH, T4, T3 and T3/T4 concentrations among different groups. During 24 h, minimal variation in serum T3 concentration was observed in group B with mean ∆T3 of 15.4 ± 10.5 ng/dl. T3-Tmax, T3-Cmax and AUC0 - 24 in the combined sustained-release preparation were 4.38 ± 1.1 h., 101.0 ± 5.7 ng/dl and 2257 ± 110 ng.h/L, respectively which were significantly different from the control group. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with a single dose of SR-T3 plus LT4 is associated with increased serum T3/T4 ratio and minimal excursions in serum T3 concentration during 24 h; however, it was not significantly different from the control group. To incorporate sustained-release T3 in the management of hypothyroidism, a higher ratio of SR-T3 to LT4 than that of the previously recommended by the international organizations is suggested. IRCT REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT20100922004794N13. https://www.irct.ir/search/result?query=IRCT20100922004794N13 . Registration date: 08/12/2021.

The Role of Recipient Thyroid Hormone Supplementation in Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplantation: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether recipient administration of thyroid hormone (liothyronine [T3]) is associated with reduced rates of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after orthotopic heart transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 609 adult heart transplant recipients were divided into 2 cohorts: patients who did not receive T3 (no T3 group, from 2009 to 2014), and patients who received T3 (T3 group, from 2015 to 2019). Propensity-adjusted logistic regression was performed to assess the association between T3 supplementation and PGD. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria and propensity-score analysis, the final cohort included 461 patients. The incidence of PGD was not significantly different between the groups (33.9% no T3 group v 40.8% T3 group; p = 0.32). Mortality at 30 days (3% no T3 group v 2% T3 group; p = 0.53) and 1 year (10% no T3 group v 12% T3 group; p = 0.26) were also not significantly different. When assessing the severity of PGD, there were no differences in the groups' rates of moderate PGD (not requiring mechanical circulatory support other than an intra-aortic balloon pump) or severe PGD (requiring mechanical circulatory support other than an intra-aortic balloon pump). However, segmented time regression analysis revealed that patients in the T3 group were less likely to develop severe PGD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that recipient single-dose thyroid hormone administration may not protect against the development of PGD, but may attenuate the severity of PGD.

Hypokalemic Hypophosphatemic Thyrotoxic Periodic Paralysis Associated with Bipolar Disorder Therapy.

Hypokalemic thyrotoxic periodic paralysis (TPP) is a rare complication of hyperthyroidism. TPP occurs due to the intracellular shift of potassium in the setting of elevated thyroid hormone. As potassium begins to be replenished, there is a risk of inducing hyperkalemia due to the extracellular shift of potassium. Therefore, it is recommended to replete potassium conservatively. There have been a number of studies reviewing the possible benefits of elevated thyroid hormone in treating bipolar disorder. In this case report, a 37-year-old man with a past medical history of hypothyroidism and bipolar disorder presented with bilateral lower extremity paralysis. Liothyronine was added to his stable hypothyroid regimen for bipolar management. His initial labs on presentation were notable for severe hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, and an undetectable thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). He was diagnosed with TPP, and his electrolytes were corrected with minimal repletion within 24 hours. More research is still required before concluding the role of thyroid hormone in mood disorders. This case report demonstrates a serious complication of supplemental thyroid hormone use. It is crucial to monitor thyroid function tests closely in order to avoid iatrogenic hyperthyroidism.

Are We Restoring Thyroid Hormone Signaling in Levothyroxine-Treated Patients With Residual Symptoms of Hypothyroidism?

INTRODUCTION: Levothyroxine (LT4) at doses that maintain the serum thyroid-stimulating hormone levels within the normal range constitutes the standard of care for the treatment of hypothyroidism. After a few months, this eliminates the signs and symptoms of overt hypothyroidism in the majority of patients, owing to the endogenous activation of thyroxine to triiodothyronine, the biologically active thyroid hormone. Still, a small percentage of the patients (10%-20%) exhibit residual symptoms, despite having normal serum thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. These symptoms include cognitive, mood, and metabolic deficits, with a significant impairment in psychological well-being and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To provide a summary of progress in the approach of patients with hypothyroidism that exhibit residual symptoms despite treatment. METHODS: We reviewed the current literature and here we focused on the mechanisms leading to a deficiency of T3 in some LT4-treated patients, the role of residual thyroid tissue and the rationale for combination therapy with LT4 + liothyronine (LT3). RESULTS: A score of clinical trials comparing therapy with LT4 versus LT4 + LT3 concluded that both are safe and equally effective (neither is superior); however, these trials failed to recruit a sufficiently large number of patients with residual symptoms. New clinical trials that considered LT4-treated symptomatic patients revealed that such patients benefit from and prefer therapy containing LT4 + LT3; desiccated thyroid extract has also been used with similar results. A practical approach to patients with residual symptoms and on initiation of combination therapy with LT4 + LT3 is provided. CONCLUSION: A recent joint statement of the American, British, and European Thyroid Associations recommends that a trial with combination therapy be offered to patients with hypothyroidism that do not fully benefit from therapy with LT4.

Association of Thyroid Hormone Medication Adherence With Risk of Dementia.

CONTEXT: Recent studies suggest that hypothyroidism is a risk factor for dementia. Based on existing literature, it is unclear if treatment or compliance to treatment is associated with decreased dementia risk in hypothyroidism patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between thyroid hormone medication adherence and risk of dementia. METHODS: A population-based cohort study following patients with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism until incidence of dementia, death, or December 31, 2020, whichever came earliest. The study comprised 41 554 older adults age 50 and above with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism between 2004 and 2008 who underwent health screening. Risk of dementia was evaluated using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Among 5188 men (12.5%) and 36 366 (87.5%) women, 2120 cases of incident dementia were identified. After stratification of the participants according to the interquartile range of the medication possession ratio (MPR), the fourth quartile (highest adherence) showed a 14% lower risk of overall dementia compared with the first quartile (lowest adherence) (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86; 95% CI 0.76-0.97). No consistent association was observed between thyroid hormone medication adherence and vascular dementia. After a dichotomous stratification of the MPR, higher MPR (≥0.8) showed a lower risk of Alzheimer disease (adjusted hazard ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.99) than lower MPR (<0.8). CONCLUSION: Better adherence to thyroid hormone medication may be beneficial in preventing incident dementia, especially Alzheimer disease, in older adults with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism. Along with the resolution of hypothyroid symptoms and the reduction of cardiovascular risk factors, the reduction of dementia risk may be another potential benefit of thyroid hormone medication.

Use of liothyronine (T3) in hypothyroidism: Joint British Thyroid Association/Society for endocrinology consensus statement.

Persistent symptoms in patients treated for hypothyroidism are common. Despite more than 20 years of debate, the use of liothyronine for this indication remains controversial, as numerous randomised trials have failed to show a benefit of treatment regimens that combine liothyronine (T3) with levothyroxine over levothyroxine monotherapy. This consensus statement attempts to provide practical guidance to clinicians faced with patients who have persistent symptoms during thyroid hormone replacement therapy. It applies to non-pregnant adults and is focussed on care delivered within the UK National Health Service, although it may be relevant in other healthcare environments. The statement emphasises several key clinical practice points for patients dissatisfied with treatment for hypothyroidism. Firstly, it is important to establish a diagnosis of overt hypothyroidism; patients with persistent symptoms during thyroid hormone replacement but with no clear biochemical evidence of overt hypothyroidism should first have a trial without thyroid hormone replacement. In those with established overt hypothyroidism, levothyroxine doses should be optimised aiming for a TSH in the 0.3-2.0 mU/L range for 3 to 6 months before a therapeutic response can be assessed. In some patients, it may be acceptable to have serum TSH below reference range (e.g. 0.1-0.3 mU/L), but not fully suppressed in the long term. We suggest that for some patients with confirmed overt hypothyroidism and persistent symptoms who have had adequate treatment with levothyroxine and in whom other comorbidities have been excluded, a trial of liothyronine/levothyroxine combined therapy may be warranted. The decision to start treatment with liothyronine should be a shared decision between patient and clinician. However, individual clinicians should not feel obliged to start liothyronine or to continue liothyronine medication provided by other health care practitioners or accessed without medical advice, if they judge this not to be in the patient's best interest.